A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy





S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register
Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Can the Republican Party
Recover from Iraq?

Wall Street Journal, by Peggy Noonan

Original Article

Posted By:tisHimself, 3/23/2013 10:10:30 PM

The air has been full of 10th-anniversary Iraq war retrospectives. One that caught my eye was a smart piece by Tom Curry, national affairs writer for NBC News, who wrote of one element of the story, the war´s impact on the Republican Party: "The conflict not only transformed" the GOP, "but all of American politics." It has, but it´s an unfinished transformation. Did the Iraq war hurt the GOP? Yes. The war, and the crash of ´08, half killed it. It´s still digging out, and whether it can succeed is an open question.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: otronome, 3/23/2013 10:15:49 PM     (No. 9240853)

What´s an iraq?


Reply 2 - Posted by: fhancock, 3/23/2013 10:26:16 PM     (No. 9240862)

Somebody tell Peggy that GW has not been President for over 1,500 days


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: noparallel, 3/23/2013 10:31:25 PM     (No. 9240869)

Didn´t she retire?


Reply 4 - Posted by: absalom, 3/23/2013 10:35:10 PM     (No. 9240872)

Talleyrand remarked; "It was far, far worse than a Russian military catastrophe; it was a mistake. And great nations cannot make such mistakes and remain great." Iraq was a mistake of the first magnitude and wholly owned by the biggest buffoon to sit in the WH in 100 years; the consequences of which will reverberate for generations.


Reply 5 - Posted by: EnsignO´Toole, 3/23/2013 10:39:48 PM     (No. 9240875)

Peggy Noonan is so yesterday. Ms. Noonan hasn´t gotten over the fact that Republicans aren´t panting over what she thinks.


Reply 6 - Posted by: bmoc, 3/23/2013 10:40:14 PM     (No. 9240876)

The so called ´Crash of ´08´ was triggered purposely by George Soros to slow the sudden burst of popularity of the McCain/Palin ticket. McCain played his hand so poorly in that September time period that he never got the chance to win in the November election. His further inability stop those members of his own staff from taking very loud and very vocal potshots at Palin during a running campaign finished the barrage and then sunk him.

I understand that George W. Bush went wobbly and wandered, almost pandered to the left in his last three years, but my biggest problem was that he or members of his team, lead by Karl Rove, never ONCE stood up and called the traitorous left out for the series of outright lies they told about him. I know he signed on to many things that furthered Agenda 21 and lots of other bad things but never once did I ever question his love for America. I question every motive, every word, and every thought that emanates from this administration.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Hazymac, 3/23/2013 11:01:34 PM     (No. 9240889)

#4 forgets (or, more likely, conveniently ignores) that going into Iraq was very much a bipartisan decision with the explicit support of, for instance, both Clintons, John Kerry, Al Gore, Harry Reid, and a cast of hundreds of prominent Democrats. (Only the Occupy Wall Street types didn´t support the war.) Most of the world´s intelligence agencies thought (correctly, in hindsight) that Saddam Hussein, who had used lethal gas on the Kurds, killing thousands, had an active WMD program, the contents of which were spirited over the border into Assad´s Syria just before the bombs fell in 2003. If Baby Assad is using poison gas on his own population now, he´s probably using some of Saddam´s old stock.

And speaking of the sadistic Saddam, he had in recent years invaded Iran, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia, and was a clear and present danger to any kind of peace or stability in that vital region. Iraq, because of its location and proximity to so many neighbors (the "keystone state") in the region, had a murderous ruler who had to be put down. So he was.

It´s only ignorance--carefully cuiltivated by the MSM and people like #4--that places sole responsibility for the Iraq war on the Republicans. The war wasn´t prosecuted properly until the surge that won the war, but the war was won. If the strategically inept--if not actively treasonous--actions of Obama reverse tha gains, the onus will be on him where it belongs.

The USA gave Iraq, which has superabundant natural resources (oil, gas, gold, arable land, etc.), an opportunity to become a wealthy and independent nation. Whether or not Iraq achieves that won´t be known for several years. But at least they have a chance.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 3/23/2013 11:06:41 PM     (No. 9240892)

I will go to my grave loathing the Democrat party for trying to have me shot in the jungles of Viet Nam. The reservoir of hatred for warmongers is vast and deep. I do not hate W, I pity him. He was weak minded and allowed the neocons to manipulate him. He was not actively evil, like LBJ. But nonetheless he was amazingly effective at destroying the GOP.


Reply 9 - Posted by: bogeegolf, 3/23/2013 11:12:56 PM     (No. 9240895)

thank you #7


Reply 10 - Posted by: Black Knight, 3/23/2013 11:13:55 PM     (No. 9240896)

Peggy, your insights engine is running in reverse on empty.

The GOP is flailing because its RINOS are panicking in everyone for themselves mode as the nation transitions to a taker-enabled tyranny over the makers.

You scamper after the billowing chaff without recognizing the wheat.


Reply 11 - Posted by: smcchk, 3/23/2013 11:57:40 PM     (No. 9240917)

It seemed to me that we had stabilized Iraq and established a strategic presence in the Middle East. That seemed to be a victory or at least, progress. Perhaps, if we had not given it all up, Iran would not be so threatening today.


Reply 12 - Posted by: danvillebill, 3/23/2013 11:58:27 PM     (No. 9240918)

This woman´s relevance ended several decades ago.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: msjena, 3/24/2013 12:01:00 AM     (No. 9240919)

What is wrong with this woman? Iraq was a major success for America--not just the Republican Party. A brutal dictator who was hostile to the US and who had nuclear ambitions was replaced with a democratic government. That is more than can be said of half of Europe after World War II!


Reply 14 - Posted by: St. Pitbull, 3/24/2013 12:06:19 AM     (No. 9240922)

Peggy Noonan is nothing but a well-off bag lady that rides buses around NYC saying the rosary (really!).


Reply 15 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 3/24/2013 12:14:12 AM     (No. 9240923)

Noonan is just sore because GW did not hire her and Reagan had long since tired of her and rarely talked with her. As for GW - strong and steady and was the first president to have to deal with a deadly attack on the USA. Noonan was on TV with someone prattling about how wonderful she is and how she did all of the work. Nonsense and so is the troll that trashed GW.


Reply 16 - Posted by: ColoWapiti, 3/24/2013 12:24:42 AM     (No. 9240929)

Wow. If #4 thinks W was the biggest buffoon, I cannot imagine what words they would have to be use for the current occupant of the White House. Maybe they would start with "biggest enemy".


Reply 17 - Posted by: rocket scientist, 3/24/2013 12:30:29 AM     (No. 9240932)

Maybe a better question would have been, "Can the Republican Party recover from Karl Rove and the Establishment Repubs/RINOs?"


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: BcdErick, 3/24/2013 1:16:47 AM     (No. 9240945)

This little rant is stupid and beyond irrelevant. By all signs Peggy Noonan is, or soon will be, senile. She´s "calling for debate"? Give me a break. Who could possibly care? She voted for Obama in 2008. And she fawned over him like a love struck teenage girl in the run-up to the election. You can look it up. Is Iraq better off today than it was under Saddam? The Iraqis think so. Obama has tried for 4 years to grab defeat from the jaws of victory. But he´s just too stupid to pull it off. He doesn´t care about Iraq. He´s more interested in destroying America.


Reply 19 - Posted by: steveW, 3/24/2013 2:01:55 AM     (No. 9240958)

The justified removal of Saddam Hussein was exploited mercilessly by the loathsome MSM as an ax with which to split open the head of the GOP. It was their best chance since Vietnam to show that it was they, the loathsome MSM, who were "anti-war" and Republicans who heartlessly rejoiced at the deaths of brown-skinned "freedom fighters". The loathsome MSM succeeded magnificently in this campaign of lies.

To discuss "...the war´s impact on the Republican Party" as Peggy Noonan and others are doing now, with little regard to the MSM dirty tricks that poisoned world opinion - the actual heart of the problem, not the Iraq war itself - is worse than counterproductive. Had the removal of a terrorist-supporting arab dictator with potential to spread WMDs been led by a Democrat president, we all know how "anti-war" the loathsome MSM would have been then, and how many times Abu Ghraib would have been headlined (zero times, instead of hundreds). We see this hypocrisy even now, as not one single "grim milestone" has blanketed the airwaves since Dear Leader began his White House occupation.

W made many mistakes, but prosecuting the war like a true commander in chief was not one of them. The issue here, Peggy, is not Republican policy on national defense. It is the false image and hateful attitude intentionally conveyed by the loathsome MSM about Republican policy on national defense. If you can´t separate the two, you are not a clear thinker. W did more for world peace than any person alive today, and is ruthlessly scorned for it. The moral coward of a Marxist fraud gets the Nobel Peace Prize, and the world cheers. Analyze that, and you´ll understand the actual threat to the party so much better.


Reply 20 - Posted by: flatwater, 3/24/2013 4:05:06 AM     (No. 9240983)

Can Peggy Noonan get through an entire morning without cracking open a second box of wine?

Go to hell, Peggy.


Reply 21 - Posted by: flatwater, 3/24/2013 4:09:07 AM     (No. 9240984)

#7,

my sincerest thanks for clarifying things for our fact-free posters. Refreshing, hearing the truth told clearly and succinctly.


Reply 22 - Posted by: mws50, 3/24/2013 6:04:42 AM     (No. 9240994)

The Iraq war went exceptionally well, and was over in 3 weeks. The occupation, after the war was won, failed. We forgot to make the occupation painful, decisive, and final, then backing out and letting Iraq rebuild for themselves. We got all PC, to show the world and our idiot media we care. Dumb idea.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: tulipwood, 3/24/2013 7:33:28 AM     (No. 9241078)

I think its time for Peggy to write a Christmas book... or maybe take up knitting.


Reply 24 - Posted by: AltaD, 3/24/2013 7:40:20 AM     (No. 9241092)

#7 and #19 should be writing for the WSJ in place of Ms. Noonan.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Malia2012, 3/24/2013 10:28:07 AM     (No. 9241292)

Peggy Noonan is well past her expiration date and no one but Joe Skarborring pays any attention to her. Amen #7, and #19 and all other intelligent posters here today.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Dragonslayer2, 3/24/2013 11:45:08 AM     (No. 9241404)

Well said, #22. The invasion of Iraq was justified and well done. What puzzles me is the aftermath. What made us think that the Sunnis and Shiites, suddenly given freedom from tyranny, would not fight for supremacy, having been at odds since the Seventh Century? I have found that difficult to comprehend.

We could have left the country in a shambles and let them fight it out, but al Qaeda would have lept into the gap and taken advantage of their partisan idiocies. Tactically, perhaps we should have acted like conquerors and kicked one party or both into submission before leaving. That might have provided a level of stability to prevent the insurgence of al Qaeda, but it is not our style.

I don´t pretend to know how it should have ended, but I never have doubted the necessity of unseating Saddam. Let´s try to differentiate the two issues before discussing the cost of Iraq. I believe the Iraqi invasion saved us from a nuclear, Saddam -aided holocaust.





Reply 27 - Posted by: absalom, 3/24/2013 1:04:45 PM     (No. 9241525)

Having spent two decades in the Middle East, allow me to share a little reality w/the arm chair von Clausewitz´s. After Schwarzkopf drove the Iraqi´s from Kuwait, the USAF imposed no fly zones in the Kurdish north and Shiite south,´killing´ anything that moved and gradually strangling Baghdad. Our drone and manned tech, owned the Iraqi air. Yet Bush opted for a land war which Tommy Franks executed brilliantly, via a helo/tank blitz through the Euphrates and Tigris Valley storming Baghdad in less than 100 days. That was the decisive moment to impose order and bend Iraq to our will; so where was the plan??? THERE WAS NO PLAN! Bush fantasizing about Arab Democracy; w/Baghdad as Paris ´44, and Iraqi´s showering our troops w/candy, flowers and kisses; NEVER HAD A PLAN, and the results were catastrophic. In fact, 99.4% of our casualties were sustained after the collapse of Baghdad. Most tellingly, Iraq remains an unstable, ungovernable and violent cauldron of religious and sectarian hatred now moving rapidly into the orbit of Iran w/the political ascendance of the Shia. The usual suspects will eternally carry water for Bush, no matter what. A example is their WMD canard, a thoroughly discredited fantasy, they repeat endlessly to excuse Bush´s incompetence. Also, for the record, the gas Saddam deployed against the Kurd was Phosgene; first used at Ypres in 1915 and it´s not a WMD. So I guess Talleyrand was wrong and mistakes like this don´t matter after all. So be it. Bush is the core reason Obama sits in the WH today.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Sunhan65, 3/24/2013 1:54:51 PM     (No. 9241589)

Since I often agree with #4 on things domestic, I approach our disagreements on foreign policy with caution. We simply see things differently. Here´s how I see it: The Muslim terror attacks on New York and Washington showed the world how easy it is to kill an American city. They also invalidated a central premise of post-World War II national security: Mutually Assured Destruction. We cannot deter terrorists who want to die; we cannot rely on MAD to stop madmen. We can only kill them before they kill us. Regimes that seek the intersection between terrorist delivery systems and genocidal intent are a clear and present danger to the American republic and must be eliminated. Iraq was such a regime and is no longer.


Reply 29 - Posted by: oh-heck, 3/24/2013 2:32:57 PM     (No. 9241633)

Time will compare the success of the Iraq intervention to the Afghanistan intervention. Bush won and quietly shipped out thousands of tons of yellow cake that Hussein had accumulated. Just for contrast, last year insurgents slipped onto a US air base and destroyed 8 Harrier jump jets and killed the American commander. Give me Bush any day.



Post Reply   Close thread 728357




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "tisHimself"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "tisHimself"



More good business news for state
American Press, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 7/31/2013 1:10:11 PM     Post Reply
Stellar business news continues to flow seemingly unabated for Louisiana. The latest comes from Southern Business & Development magazine which named our state and Texas as Co-State of the Year for 2013 recipients. And Louisiana is no flash in the pan. The Bayou State has won or shared the magazine’s No. 1 ranking four of the past five years. Southwest Louisiana had a significant role in Louisiana’s ranking.

Louisiana entering new
era of health care
Daily World, by Gov. Bobby Jindal    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 7/25/2013 12:17:46 PM     Post Reply
It is an exciting time in our state as we embark on a new era for health care in Louisiana that will greatly improve care, reduce costs for patients and taxpayers, and better prepare the doctors of tomorrow. We are embarking on this new and exciting era because, in Louisiana, we were faced with the unique challenge of adapting a public-run, statewide charity hospital system to the evolving health care needs of our people. While our one-of-a-kind charity hospital system did tremendous work for decades —successfully serving the people of Louisiana and meeting their health care needs

You Might be in a Liberal Parish If...
National Catholic Register, by Matthew Archibold    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 7/18/2013 11:17:31 AM     Post Reply
You might be in a liberal parish if... ...your family has to split up to find the tabernacle. ...the pastor wears an Izod shirt and introduces himself as "Steve." ...there´s maraca´s in the band. ...your pastor´s last name starts with "Pf". ...there´s a bin in the narthex with old copies of Commonweal. ...there´s more than three rainbow decals in the parking lot which actually match the pastor´s vestments.

ObamaCare´s Coalition Begins
to Fracture
Wall Street Journal, by Karl Rove    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 7/18/2013 5:41:50 AM     Post Reply
The letter was unusually harsh. Addressed to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, it was really intended for President Barack Obama. The letter was not from Mr. Obama´s GOP adversaries but from the presidents of three powerful unions. On July 12, James Hoffa of the Teamsters (1.4 million members), Joseph Hansen of the Food and Commercial Workers (1.3 million members) and D. Taylor of UNITE-HERE (200,000 members, mostly culinary and hotel workers) wrote to complain about the president´s Affordable Care Act.

Botching Immigration Again
National Review Online, by Gov. Bobby Jindal    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 7/10/2013 12:38:57 AM     Post Reply
As the son of immigrants to this country, and as a student of American history, I’m an unapologetic advocate for immigration. I believe immigration is crucial for the health and growth of our nation. That’s why it’s so troublesome to see Washington in the process of botching immigration reform for the umpteenth time. Across the country, we see the ramifications of the broken status quo. Reform is necessary for the future health of the economy and to ensure our border’s security. Business owners are sick and tired of struggling under the current system to make ends meet

Two Competing Political Philosphies
American Thinker, by Mark. W. Henderson    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 7/5/2013 10:02:36 AM     Post Reply
Happy Birthday, America! This week we celebrate our country´s birth. Patriots honor America as a republic conceived as a polity in which all may live safely and securely in the enjoyment of their inalienable, God-given rights. We are inspired by the high idealism of the Founders and stirred by the poignant remembrance of all those who have fought, worked, and sacrificed to make the USA the freest and most prosperous country in the history of the world.

Climate Change for the GOP
Weekly Standard, by Eli Lehrer    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 7/3/2013 12:41:01 PM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama’s climate agenda announced last week represents the latest of many Democratic party efforts to address climate change. Although it includes no new legislation, the president’s plan makes unprecedented use of executive branch powers and offers a great many things that appeal to core Democratic constituencies. Implemented in full, the new power plant carbon rules, further delays in economically beneficial pipeline projects, and added green energy projects would result in a bigger, more intrusive government that exerts greater control over the economy, rewards perceived “good guys,” and punishes supposed “bad guys.”

Dueling Economists
Weekly Standard, by Charlotte Allen    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 7/3/2013 12:30:23 PM     Post Reply
John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946), godfather of the “stimulus” and the “multiplier,” and Friedrich Hayek (1899-1992), who argued that government intervention in the economy breeds prosperity-killing economic distortions, weren’t just polar opposites in economic theory. They were real-life sparring partners. And as Nicholas Wapshott points out in his double biography, their ideas played themselves out in Great Britain, where both Keynes and Hayek lived and taught, and in the United States, where the economic philosophies of both informed the highest levels of policy-making—at different times, of course.

Gay Marriage: A Country Is Moving,
Its People Not So Much
Pacific Standard, by Michael Todd    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 7/3/2013 6:18:51 AM     Post Reply
In coverage leading up to and reporting on the Supreme Court’s decisions last week removing some obstacles to gay marriage, a persistent meme has been that Americans in the last few years are increasingly OK with same-sex marriage. The evidence cited is public opinion polling, like this Gallup poll that shows Americans’ acceptance rolling over the halfway mark about a year ago. But a new white paper from Rice University’s Portraits of American Life Study, which looks at the religious attitudes of the exact same group of 1,294 randomly sampled Americans captured in 2006 and again last year,

Hey GOP: Mexican Immigrants
Aren’t Necessarily Democrats
Pacific Standard, by Tom Jacobs    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 7/3/2013 6:15:14 AM     Post Reply
Once you get past all of the posturing, opposition to immigration reform among congressional Republicans is at least partially based on self-preservation. There is a widespread belief that Mexican immigrants who become citizens are overwhelmingly disposed to vote Democratic. Newly published research suggests that’s a complete misreading of the facts. According to this analysis, politically engaged Mexicans who move to the U.S. fall all over the ideological spectrum, very much like native-born Americans.

Balz book: Romney considered
scrapping bid in spring of 2011
Washington Post, by Sean Sullivan    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 7/3/2013 12:28:07 AM     Post Reply
Mitt Romney officially announced his candidacy for president in June 2011. But during the spring of that year, Romney considered scrapping his campaign altogether, as detailed in a soon-to-be-released book about the 2012 presidential campaign by The Washington Post’s Dan Balz. Then in the exploratory committee phase of his campaign, Romney was preparing on a May morning to deliver a speech in Michigan to defend the health care plan he signed into law as governor of Massachusetts and attack President Obama’s federal health care measure.

Interview: George Gilder
on Knowledge and Power
PJ Media, by Ed Driscoll    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 7/2/2013 11:09:24 PM     Post Reply
“Wealth is essentially the accumulation of knowledge,” George Gilder tells me in our new interview. “It requires that government get out of the way, that government not be a noisy force in the economy, distracting entrepreneurs from their creative purposes toward government goals and government distractions.” In his new book Knowledge and Power, the veteran technology author and futurist writes, “Socialists believe their mission is to seize capital for the masses. But the great secret of capitalism is that, detached from a capitalist, there is no capital.”



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Mark Levin urges his 8.5 million
listeners to call a ´We the People´
convention to stop Obama

67 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 7/31/2013 7:38:05 PM     Post Reply
Mark Levin, who hosts one of America´s top radio talk shows and is considered by supporters to be the people´s pundit on the Constitution, is rallying his 8.5 million-strong audience to demand an historic convention of state governments to halt the "oppressive power" of the federal government. The author of two New York Times bestsellers on the threats to the Constitution, Levin hopes his latest, "The Liberty Amendments," out mid-August, will spark the state lawmakers to tap a rarely used Constitutional provision to institute measures that would brake President Obama´s use of executive orders, bar thousand-page laws and

Benghazi Hearing: Special Ops
Commander Said He Was Traveling,
Had ‘Unreliable Communications’

50 replie(s)
PJ Media, by Bridget Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 7/31/2013 8:07:31 PM     Post Reply
The former commander of special operations in Northern Africa told a closed-door briefing today that he was largely detached from events the night of the Benghazi attack as he was traveling at the time. The testimony of Col. George H. Bristol, USMC, Former Commander, Joint Special Operations Task Force-Trans Sahara, Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command Africa, had been eagerly anticipated by members of Congress. Originally, lawmakers had been told by the Defense Department that he had retired — the actual date is Aug. 1, an “administrative error” according to the Pentagon — and that they didn’t have

George Zimmerman armed when
stopped for speeding
in Texas, report says

45 replie(s)
CBS News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 7/31/2013 4:36:37 PM     Post Reply
FORNEY, Texas - George Zimmerman, the former Florida neighborhood watch leader cleared of all charges in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, was pulled over for speeding in North Texas on Sunday, CBS DFW reports. According to the station, Zimmerman was armed when officers pulled him over on Highway 80 in Forney, east of Dallas. (Snip) The officer reportedly did not recognize Zimmerman, who was driving a Honda pickup. Zimmerman told the officer he was armed and was then told to put the weapon in his glove compartment, according to the station.

John McCain: Hillary´s a ´rock
star,´ Fox is ´schizophrenic´

45 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 7/31/2013 6:58:18 PM     Post Reply
Arizona Sen. John McCain was the Republican Party´s 2008 presidential nominee and he still wants the keys to the Oval Office. But he is beginning to sound more like a fan of likely 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. "She´s a rock star," he said in a newly released interview. "She has, maybe not glamour, but certainly the aura of someone widely regarded throughout the world," he added in a reference to her work as secretary of State. McCain, reportedly trying to win back his reputation as a GOP maverick, was asked by the New Republic

Huma partly blamed herself over
Weiner´s sexting, friends say

44 replie(s)
New York Post, by Sally Goldenberg & Leonard Greene    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 8/1/2013 5:17:56 AM     Post Reply
Serial sexter Anthony Weiner’s wife partly blamed herself last year when her horndog husband confessed to her that he was at it again. Friends and family told People magazine that Huma Abedin was kicking herself at the time for bailing out of couples counseling and focusing more on their newborn baby boy. But, thanks to a new round of joint therapy that continues even now, the couple was able to put the relapse behind them. “They really became a unit, and she feels much closer to Anthony now,” a relative told the magazine. That’s a long way from how Abedin

PPP poll: Palin leads Alaska
Republican Senate primary by 10 points

41 replie(s)
Hot Air. com, by Allahpundit    Original Article
Posted By: Not your typical New Yorker- 7/31/2013 11:12:11 AM     Post Reply
Gotta figure her lead would be even bigger without Joe Miller in the field here. Her nomination for the taking? Alaska should be a top tier pick up opportunity for Senate Republicans next year…but their top choice of a candidate is Sarah Palin. 36% of GOP primary voters in the state say they’d like Palin to be their standard bearer against Mark Begich to 26% for Mead Treadwell, 15% for Dan Sullivan, and 12% for Joe Miller.

E-mails Suggest Collusion
Between FEC, IRS to
Target Conservative Groups

40 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Eliana Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 7/31/2013 6:07:16 AM     Post Reply
Embattled Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner and an attorney in the Federal Election Commission’s general counsel’s office appear to have twice colluded to influence the record before the FEC’s vote in the case of a conservative non-profit organization, according to e-mails unearthed by the House Ways and Means Committee and obtained exclusively by National Review Online. The correspondence suggests the discrimination of conservative groups extended beyond the IRS and into the FEC, where an attorney from the agency’s enforcement division in at least one case sought and received tax information about the status of a conservative group,

Colin Powell admits to sending ´very
personal´ emails to a Romanian diplomat
but DENIES having an affair as
a hacker threatens to leak their intimate
messages

40 replie(s)
Daily Mail Online (UK), by Hayley Peterson    Original Article
Posted By: zephyrgirl- 8/1/2013 4:01:08 PM     Post Reply
Colin Powell has admitted to exchanging ´very personal´ emails with a Romanian diplomat but denies having an affair with the much younger woman after a hacker threatened to release their intimate messages. The 76-year-old retired general told the Smoking Gun that he met Corina Cretu, 45, roughly 10 years ago when she was working as an assistant to the president of Romania. She is now a member of the European Parliament. ´After I left the Department of State in January 2005 we stayed in touch via email,´ he told TSG.

McCain strolls into Dem caucus meeting
39 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Kurtz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 7/31/2013 1:28:56 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain — a Democrat? There was confusion Wednesday after the Arizona Republican mistakenly strolled into President Obama’s meeting with Senate Democrats at the Capitol. The room full of Democrats — who happened to be meeting in the same room where the Senate GOP usually holds their weekly policy luncheons — erupted in applause and laughter as the former Republican presidential candidate made his entrance. As McCain, 76, walked out of the Dem-filled space, reporters pressed him as to why he stepped foot in the room.

Oprah Decries Americans´ Ignorance
on Civil Rights, Laments ´Millions´
of Blacks Lynched

38 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Hollywood, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 8/1/2013 10:49:27 AM     Post Reply
In preparation for the release of Oscar-bait film The Butler, Forest Whitaker, Oprah Winfrey, and director Lee Daniels (Precious) sat down with Parade magazine. The film chronicles a butler (Whitaker) who works in the White House through seven administrations. Winfrey plays the butler’s wife. In the interview, Winfrey explained her sadness that so few Americans know about the history of the civil rights movement: “They don’t know diddly-squat. Diddly-squat.” She then said of the historic use of the n-word, “I always think of the millions of people who heard that as their last

Obama´s Creeping Authoritarianism
36 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by Daniel Henninger    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 7/31/2013 9:41:29 PM     Post Reply
If we learned anything about Barack Obama in his first term it is that when he starts repeating the same idea over and over, what´s on his mind is something else. The first term´s over-and-over subject was "the wealthiest 1%." Past some point, people wondered why he kept beating these half-dead horses. After the election, we knew. It was to propagandize the targeted voting base that would provide his 4% popular-vote margin of victory—very young voters and minorities. They believed. He won. The second-term over-and-over, elevated in his summer speech tour, is the shafting of the middle class. But

New EPA chief promises jobs,
pulls no punches in
climate change fight

34 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Ben Wolfgang    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 7/31/2013 9:54:00 AM     Post Reply
In her first speech since taking over the Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthy came out swinging Tuesday and promised to ramp up the aggressive climate change agenda laid out by President Obama.(snip)“Can we stop talking about environmental regulations killing jobs? Please, at least for today,” she said during remarks at Harvard Law School. “We need to cut carbon pollution to grow jobs. We need to cut carbon pollution to strengthen the economy. Let’s talk about it positively. Let’s approach this as an opportunity of a lifetime. There are too many lifetimes at stake.”


Post Reply   Close thread 728357





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register
Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS