 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Rand Paul goes on the offensive against Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:sparky86, 3/21/2013 4:53:27 PM
|
| In an appearance on Fox News Channel’s “America Live” on Thursday, Kentucky Republican Sen. Paul told host Bill Hemmer that Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh are wrong to criticize him for working to provide legal status to illegal immigrants. Paul, fresh off his win in the Conservative Political Action Conference presidential straw poll, specifically disagreed with the suggestion he is being “suckered” into an agreement with Democrats. “I’ve got a news flash for those who want to call people names on amnesty: What we have now is de facto amnesty,” Paul replied. “We have 11 million people here
|
Comments: I´m old enough to remember the 1986 Simpson-Mazzoli Act and all of this I am hearing from Rand Paul and Marco Rubio sounds an awful lot like what I heard from Alan Simpson, Ted Kennedy and members of the Reagan administration back in 1986!
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 3/21/2013 4:59:53 PM (No. 9237338)
And Ronaldus Maximus (Peace be upon Him)....
´Double crossed his heart´ promised us all that this was the one and only, I really mean it, never ever again..... time we´re gonna do this.
Are the Metsikans too big to fail ???
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
RKfree2b, 3/21/2013 5:03:50 PM (No. 9237341)
How about as a condition of amnesty, those getting amnesty cannot vote until 25 years after receiving amnesty. Let´s see all those altruistic politicians stand up and give illegal aliens what the illegal aliens want...citizenship. All the politicians want is the votes. What a bunch of hypocrites!!
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
noproblems, 3/21/2013 5:08:13 PM (No. 9237348)
title of article does ot seem to be correct.
i am not a rand paul fan. too much like his father and seems to be a media hound.
that being said, i have no problems with letting the illegals get work permits, but i draw the line at giving them citizenship
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
calgrammy, 3/21/2013 5:08:27 PM (No. 9237349)
Have been hearing the 11 million number for many years. The real number has to be at least double that.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
QRP, 3/21/2013 5:17:11 PM (No. 9237358)
In fairness I heard Rand Paul interviewed and he is getting a bit of a raw deal. What he is proposing is that people already here get to stay, and get to work, but they get in line to officially emigrate the same is if they were in Mexico today. In fact, they probably will not reach the head of the line in their lifetimes and will not ever be eligible to vote. That being said, I think dumping 10 million newly legal laborers in the labor pool is pretty much going to relegate any blue color job to minimum wage. That would be devastating for the economy.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
billp, 3/21/2013 5:18:26 PM (No. 9237360)
First, let´s stop more from coming across the border - then and only then should we be discussing this.
Sorry Rand, we need to stop the influx from the south - fewer Mexicano´s and more Orientals and Europeans (and I don´t mean Russian mafioso´s).
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Hermoine, 3/21/2013 5:24:37 PM (No. 9237372)
Tell ya what, I´ll trade out on the issue. I´ll go for giving illegal immigrants legal status, if we can get the GOP and Dems to drop the whole gay marriage crusade.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
chumley, 3/21/2013 5:28:42 PM (No. 9237384)
I generally like what he has to say on most subjects, so will continue to listen on this one. We are in a really bad spot here. Neither party seems able or willing to control the border. They have had many years to do it and they just arent interested. Both parties seem to want this cheap semi-slave labor here, despite the unintended costs. Since nobody in power wants to keep them out or make them leave, maybe some other option exists.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Coy860, 3/21/2013 5:31:21 PM (No. 9237394)
Why is it that Congress cannot grasp the PAIN we working citizens endure from the costs associated with educating the children of illegals, feeding them, housing them, etc? Demands for schools boosts our property taxes..Not to mention the costs of the Federal freebies. It is rewarding bad behavior (thumbing their noses at our laws).
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Hermoine, 3/21/2013 5:38:25 PM (No. 9237406)
#8 -- Both parties seem to want this cheap semi-slave labor here, despite the unintended costs.
Replace that "both parties" with the American people. It really is broader than the two parties.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Rafter, 3/21/2013 5:54:28 PM (No. 9237431)
This will be a difficult sell for Rand Paul.
Just because he got a boost from his filibuster does not mean the glow will last.
He has no halo that will extend to all of his positions. We will take them on case by case, issue by issue.
Put teeth into enforcement... I´d make it a war. We won the previous and got a huge chunk of the continent... now invaders seem to want to take it back from us.
Why does the Department of Defense not protect our borders from invasion? Dee-Fence is what´s needed. Git her done, NOW! No excuses.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
capt scurvey, 3/21/2013 6:03:29 PM (No. 9237443)
Perhaps Senator Paul should wait until his own constituents have jobs before he invites more workers in...
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
TheMotherCO, 3/21/2013 6:05:44 PM (No. 9237450)
Make the mexican government pay taxes for all of the illegals. - I am sick and tired of the illegals helping themselves to our benefits. Go home and demand your government do the taking care of and freebies for them.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Calico Al, 3/21/2013 6:21:23 PM (No. 9237467)
Put the Rush proposal that says they can´t vote for 20 yrs and see if the Dems like it.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Calico Al, 3/21/2013 6:23:27 PM (No. 9237469)
Oops. I missed #2s post.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Chuzzles, 3/21/2013 6:52:31 PM (No. 9237513)
Couldn´t agree more OP. What we have here Rand, is a failure/refusal by Congress to enforce the laws from back in 1986. You are a meathead 2.0 if you guys fall for the same bull cookies the dems are passing out as snacks.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
JAN, 3/21/2013 6:53:33 PM (No. 9237515)
How many here have actually read Senator Paul´s plan?
Too many wait for Rush to tell them to think about any given issue.
Today was very important, we find out that Rush is obsessed with Beyonce.
Guess he knows his audience. Lo or No info types.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Judith, 3/21/2013 7:04:22 PM (No. 9237526)
My take? If they can´t keep the promises they made when they placed their hand on the bible (or whatever they used)and swore to protect my country, why should I trust them about amnesty?
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
veritas, 3/21/2013 7:10:53 PM (No. 9237539)
FTA: "We have 11 million people here that have been here — some of them for a decade or more. No one is telling them to go home. … So I would say if you want to work, we’ll find a place for you. But that doesn’t mean you get special privileges. It just means we’ll get you a work visa."
You just outlined a huge chunk of special privileges, you moron!
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple and wrong." ~~ H.L. Mencken
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
#3: Within minutes of any "reform" [read: de facto amnesty], a bill will hit the hopper to "end the apartheid, fight the unfairness" of denying citizenship to these [pre-deleted] illegal aliens. Anyone -- tell me "That´s not gonna happen." Dare you.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
veritas, 3/21/2013 7:15:17 PM (No. 9237544)
FTA: "And I’m not asking for an abrogation of law. I’m not asking for something that’s not conservative. I’m the one up here saying we have to have border security. But I am one up here who says if people want to work, we’ll find a place for them."
Up is not up. Down is not down.
Alice laughed: "There´s no use trying," she said; "one can´t believe impossible things."
"I daresay you haven´t had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I´ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast." ~~ Alice in Wonderland [emphasis added]
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Italiano, 3/21/2013 7:31:36 PM (No. 9237559)
The Myth of the Conservative Latino / Hispanic. It sure worked out well here in California, but go ahead. Misery loves company.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
tnorling, 3/21/2013 7:56:13 PM (No. 9237587)
I understand why dems and unions are in favor of citizenship, but why, pray tell, do Republicans favor "amnesty" or a path to citzenship? Do they see the situation as so hopeless they just hope to cadge some political credit? That´s a bit naive. And who seriously believes we owe these illegals anything? They are depressing wages, increasing unemployment, and are often an anti-social element in society as well. Why give a reward (and encourage more of the same)? Insanity. I´ll move to Mexico - they´ll be more Americans living there in a few years. Oh, wait, they won´t let me in.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
philsner, 3/21/2013 8:37:48 PM (No. 9237641)
There is a larger issue with Beyonce. But low information voters can´t see it. They are too busy being smarter by half. And those who never listen to Rush Limbaugh generally are easy to spot when they dismiss him. They never know what they are talking about. Amnesty will guarantee the demise of the republican party, which is exactly what the democrats want.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
octrojan, 3/21/2013 8:47:42 PM (No. 9237655)
This is a one generation issue. All of the kids of illegals will be citizens. In 20 years, this will all be moot and this conversation will seem kind of cute.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
bighambone, 3/21/2013 10:09:47 PM (No. 9237721)
Rand Paul takes a libertarian approach to the illegal alien problem, make them all legal and allow them to work. That´s OK as far as it goes.
But Paul is against an enhanced e-verify system claiming that makes employers immigration officers. That is not so, as employers withholding employee income taxes does not make employers IRS agents. Without an enhanced e-verify system that all employers must use, illegal aliens will know that in the future they can continue to sneak into the USA, and will be able to continue to get hired to US jobs by fraudulently using somebody else´s ID or by using counterfeit ID.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Rumblehog, 3/21/2013 11:25:22 PM (No. 9237830)
How about a law that restricts the amount of Federal money going to States inversely proportional to the number of illegals they house? Negative feedback is a stabilizer.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Republic Can, 3/22/2013 9:39:07 AM (No. 9238289)
A free guest worker permit is an IRS amnesty for past unreported income. An amnesty US Citizens could never acquire. Thats a Fail.
Mexico is draining u$ dry. That is the second worst "leak" in our immigration system.
Start with the border and cycle immediately into collecting the money every illegal Mexican owes us.
Lets start arresting these people, one by one, and charging them with failure to report income. One-by-one, the word will spread and the self deportation will begin.
Let the lawyers chase laws. Lets us chase the money; its what this is about.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
veritas, 3/22/2013 3:13:58 PM (No. 9238977)
#24: Sorry I´m coming back here late, but a particular assertion must be debunked.
There is no such thing as "birthright citizenship" [typically and 100% incorrectly asserted by the Left as "existing" under the 14th Amendment]. Judges can read whatever into the emanations of the penumbras of the whitewalls for all I care, but both the plain language [via "subject to the jurisdiction thereof"] and the contemporary comments of the participants make the point unmistakeable.
If that weren´t enough [it is more than enough], phony "birthright citizenship" violates the ancient common-law principle that a criminal [the illegal alien parents in this case] may not profit from his illegal acts. e.g. We don´t let bank robbers keep the loot, or the fancy car they bought with it, when we catch them.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "sparky86"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "sparky86"
|
Welfare concerns persist as Gang of Eight prepares to roll out immigration bill
|
|
Daily Caller, by Caroline May
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 4/3/2013 5:08:29 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As the Gang of Eight negotiates and prepares to roll out a comprehensive immigration reform bill, members of the “gang” have not publicly addressed concerns that remain about policies surrounding law already on the books — specifically one relating to immigrant dependence on welfare. Section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act prohibits individuals likely to become primarily reliant on the government for survival: “An alien who, in the opinion of the consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of the Attorney General at the time of application for
|
Krauthammer: Gay marriage cases may presage ´assault on religion´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 3/30/2013 2:38:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On this weekend’s broadcast of “Inside Washington,” Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer said the two gay marriage cases currently before the Supreme Court could lead to an all-out assault on religion in the United States. “It gets really sticky,” Krauthammer said. “If the court were to decide that to deny same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, then you got Georgetown University – a Jesuit university [that offers] married student housing. It’s a Catholic University. So [when] it says it’s only going to allow heterosexuals, it will get sued. This will become an assault on religion.
|
Alabama state representative launches into race-fueled rant over Second Amendment rights
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 3/27/2013 3:07:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In Alabama, no state legislator, Republican or Democrat, would ever question gun rights, given the state’s conservative leanings and rural setting. But Democratic Alabama State Rep. Joseph Mitchell of Mobile, Ala. has a curious take on why his constituents in his majority African-American district should appreciate their Second Amendment rights. In emails sent from Mitchell’s official state legislature account obtained by the blog Yellow Hammer Politics and published Wednesday morning, Mitchell had a heated exchange with a constituent identified as Eddie Maxwell and provided his own defense of the Second Amendment.
|
Rand Paul goes on the offensive against Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 3/21/2013 4:53:27 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In an appearance on Fox News Channel’s “America Live” on Thursday, Kentucky Republican Sen. Paul told host Bill Hemmer that Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh are wrong to criticize him for working to provide legal status to illegal immigrants. Paul, fresh off his win in the Conservative Political Action Conference presidential straw poll, specifically disagreed with the suggestion he is being “suckered” into an agreement with Democrats. “I’ve got a news flash for those who want to call people names on amnesty: What we have now is de facto amnesty,” Paul replied. “We have 11 million people here
|
Ted Cruz hits back at Joe Scarborough for ‘willfully ignorant’ remarks
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 3/16/2013 1:53:16 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On his Friday program, MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough ranted against junior Texas Sen. Ted Cruz for questioning the constitutional merits of California Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s gun control proposals. “I don’t mean to go on and on here, but I am so shocked that he would continue to use his seat in the judiciary committee to just mislead millions of Americans and put forward a willfully ignorant position on what the Constitution says and what it does not say,” Scarborough said.
|
Mark Levin ´convinced´ GOP leadership ´has a Republican death wish´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 3/13/2013 8:22:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On his Tuesday radio show, conservative talk show host Mark Levin said House majority whip Kevin McCarthy, who this weekend claimed Congress could soon pass a comprehensive immigration bill, has a political death wish. “Ladies and gentlemen, I’m convinced the Republican leadership — particularly in the House — has a Republican death wish,” Levin said. “When you put these Mickey Mouse types in charge of the Republican Party in the House, what do you get, Mr. Producer? You get mice turds. And that’s what we have here: mice turds from the likes of [Rep.] Kevin McCarthy.” McCarthy had told CNN
|
George Will: ´I will do many things for my country and my profession. I won´t take seriously [Jay] Carney´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 3/1/2013 12:13:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Laura Ingraham’s radio show on Friday, Washington Post columnist George Will took a few digs at the Obama White House for the way it has handled the so-called sequestration crisis. According to Will, the process has shown the public just where President Barack Obama and other liberals are on government and how any reduction is “intolerable.” “I think the sequester argument is extremely useful because it’s very educational for the American public,” Will said. “When the Obama administration increases on average 17 percent the budgets of the domestic agencies that are now facing a 5 percent cut
|
Laura Ingraham: Joe Scarborough’s disdain for talk radio may stem from his own 2010 radio ´cancellation´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 2/21/2013 4:48:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On her Thursday program, conservative talker Laura Ingraham struck back at MSNBC “Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough and others who want to blame talk radio for 2012 Republican nominee Mitt Romney’s presidential election loss, suggesting that Scarborough’s anger may be linked to his radio show getting cancelled in 2010. “You got to have leaders that will turn out against the crazies in your own party,” Scarborough said Thursday morning, “and if you do — you start winning those middle, those swing voters.” Scarborough, along with others on his program Thursday, attacked certain elements in the conservative movement, including talk radio
|
Krauthammer: Expect an ´extremely aggressive and partisan´ State of the Union speech
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 2/11/2013 9:01:37 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Monday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “Special Report,” Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer predicted that tomorrow night’s State of the Union address will be the political counterpart to President Barack Obama’s fundamentally “ideological” inaugural speech. “Well, I’m not sure it will be a speech about ideas or programs,” Krauthammer said. “In fact, if the inaugural address was this sort of extraordinarily ideological address, I think the State of the Union is going to be extremely aggressive and partisan. Obama is still campaigning. He hasn’t stopped.
|
Mark Levin: ´Who the hell died and made Karl Rove queen for the day?´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 2/5/2013 1:49:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On his Monday program, syndicated conservative talker Mark Levin was irate at the news that former Bush administration deputy chief of staff Karl Rove is launching a political action committee to help electable Republicans win primaries. “I just love the way these crony capitalist Republicans — these big government Republicans, these establishment Republicans — I love the way they invoke William Buckley,” Levin said. “They invoke Ronald Reagan. Sometimes they like Obama; they invoke the Founding Fathers. And to what ends? To trash us? See, we can’t win, but the problem is we do win. Yeah, we have our losses
|
Krauthammer: We have ´a Statue of Liberty — it’s not a Statue of Equality´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 1/28/2013 2:45:25 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Over the weekend, Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer spoke at the National Review Institute Summit in Washington, D.C. During a question-and-answer session, he was asked if he thought President Barack Obama would attempt to hand-pick his successor in order to help guide the country down a path to “socialism.” Krauthammer began his response by advising against using that term. “I would just caution you about using the word, ‘socialism,’” Krauthammer said. “The reason is it is too broad a term. It encompasses all kinds of socialism, including the nasty totalitarian examples — the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic, Cuba, Korea.”
|
Levin: If Obama sidesteps Congress on debt ceiling, ´no choice´ but impeachment
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 1/15/2013 2:22:48 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On his Monday radio show, conservative talker Mark Levin said that if President Barack Obama sidesteps Congress on the debt ceiling fight and attacks the Congress’ constitutionally enumerated “core power” – that is control over spending and taxing — through executive action, Congress will have “no choice” but impeachment. Levin explained that if unilateral action by the White House — which White House spokesman Jay Carney ruled out — were to happen, it would infringe on Congress’ “core power” and should be punished with impeachment. “Now, if Obama unilaterally acts — and I think there’s a fan-dance going on here
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
McCain: ´I don´t understand´ GOP filibuster on guns
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
Christians, here´s why we´re losing our religion
|
|
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”
|
Broadcasters worry about ´Zero TV´ homes
|
|
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Hillary Clinton Would Not ´Clear the Field´ for 2016
|
|
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|