 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
The GOP establishment’s bid for change
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 3/19/2013 5:35:47 AM
|
| The Republican National Committee issued a remarkable document yesterday — unprecedented in the depth of its self-criticism and the rapidity with which it was issued in the wake of a disappointing election result five months ago. Or is it? Does the report represent a truly honest internal examination of the party’s soul — or is it mainly a not-so-veiled attack by Establishment Republicans on conservative ideas, conservative voters and conservative organizations? In fact, it’s both. The “Growth and Opportunity Project” takes a meat cleaver to the GOP. The party is strong at the state level, it says, with its 30 Republican governors.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 3/19/2013 5:51:22 AM (No. 9232349)
Until the GOP can come up with another great communicator like Ronald Reagan, they are screwed. And if even then, with the expansion of minorities who appear to cast their votes based on skin color and/or degree of coolness they still may be in the dumper, and if that´s the case so will be the entire country.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
mws50, 3/19/2013 5:56:12 AM (No. 9232352)
The RNC lost this last election, even though it was a slam-dunk win for republicans. Fortunately, normal people were able to win at the local levels.
The RNC needs to move their offices to Oklahoma City. They have stagnated, hanging around DC all these years.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
olcap, 3/19/2013 6:14:55 AM (No. 9232367)
This is pretty much a declaration that conservatives are no longer welcome. If you are conservative! either fiscal, social or both, this is clearly not the party for you. Some of the candidates may have conservative values running as "R", but that, too, will dwindle as time progresses.
It´s clear these people see a Democratic Party and a Democrat light party as the future of the so-called GOP. And these are the people who are in charge, make no mistake. It´s crucial at this point to be very sure about the qualities of the candidate that you´re looking to support if they are in the Republican Party. You must concentrate on their career and the decisions that they´ve been part of, not just the latest things they are saying. This is how these people foo us again and again and again. It´s got to come to a stop. Now.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
rabbit, 3/19/2013 6:22:49 AM (No. 9232372)
The party needs to decide what it wants to be. A person can be a fiscal conservative and be more moderate on social issues, Or, a person can be conservative on social issues but prefer bigger government. If the GOP chooses to throw out both groups, and be the party of only those who are 100% conservative on both fiscal and social issues, then it is ´pure´...but a permanent minority party.
Reagan´s genius was the ´big tent´. He appealed to those outside the base. The problem I see with today´s conservatives is that want those outside the purity zone to leave the party instead.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
kiwikit, 3/19/2013 6:29:00 AM (No. 9232377)
So the sheeple think the GOP is filled with mean old guys. Well, they never like anyone who tries to control their amoral instincts. They don´t like the police either. Without the GOP it´s the mommy´s trying to be friends with the kids. . . no grownups just chaos.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Foggybottom, 3/19/2013 6:40:27 AM (No. 9232387)
#5 that is incorrect. Ronald Reagan was a conservative leader who was a true believer with honor and integrity. What is proscribed here by the party is voluntary disolution.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Foggybottom, 3/19/2013 6:41:45 AM (No. 9232389)
Oops! I meant #4, excuse me #5.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Janjan, 3/19/2013 6:45:07 AM (No. 9232393)
Today´s GOP is not being run by Conservatives.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
doodah, 3/19/2013 6:48:44 AM (No. 9232399)
Wrong! Wrong! Wrong! The GOP the MSM CHOOSES to highlight in all their broadcasts are the old white guys. At the RNC convention, the liberal networks cut away whenever a minority or youngest representative was featured. The problem is our PR STINKS, STINKS, STINKS! We need someone to broadcast NATIONALLY all the minorities like Mia Love, and all the other minorities including the Hispanics that I saw at CPAC. The old white guys need to get together with the CPAC crowd and sew the rips in the big tent. Too many people all over our country are conservative and silent. We need to organize and maybe the tea party could help with that. Sarah Palin shouldn´t be treated as a postscript, she has talent! Welcome her and others like her. We are hurting our own.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Grace Veritas, 3/19/2013 6:53:02 AM (No. 9232404)
This isn´t about conservatives demanding purity - the conservatives have been mollified by being on the undercard on the presidential ticket since Dan Quayle. The last time the more conservative candidate was in the top spot was Reagan/Bush. Now they are telling us that the only "conservativism" that can win is the kind that welcomes illegal "Americans" and is evolved Obama-like on gay marriage. I don´t know that kind.
The problem with the whole RNC fix is that rather than positively selling a political philosophy, their pitch boils down to, "Vote Republican - We´re Not as Bad as You Think."
I can´t wait for the "Will you stand with Reince Prebius" phone call that I know will come this week.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Dragonslayer2, 3/19/2013 7:00:07 AM (No. 9232409)
Unfortunately my Republican Party of the past 44 years has fallen into the hands of ankle biters and idiots, who would rather shout their insane views, be distacted by shallow, self- serving politicians and disparage their leaders than work together for the good of the party.
This led them to fail to get behind one of the finest candidates produced since R. Reagamn and give our country away for another four years.
The Rino callers and papier mache elitists and the too many ordinary klunks deserve what will happen to them, but I don´t.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Gretchen, 3/19/2013 7:39:22 AM (No. 9232467)
From the article: "The report’s authors say they’re not offering policy prescriptions, but the overall thrust is that the GOP must moderate itself ideologically."
And therein lies the train wreck of the GOP.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
suedotsue, 3/19/2013 7:48:59 AM (No. 9232485)
The RNC family was determined to go the minority route a long time ago. Even today I heard no examples of alleged lack of caring. After Sandy Storm Chris Matthews thanked the storm for putting Obama over the top. No one mentioned minorities until GOP types raced to the microphones before the ink was even dry to say that was the ´reason.´ The article notes a much more interesting fact especially as one sees so many young people at CPAC: Romney won age 30+ voters by 1.8 million, Obama won age 18-30 by 5+ million. The RNC beat themselves up for nothing. This purity business is another dead end street. My issues have nothing to do with social issues: 1. Stop the global warming fraud. If you can´t do that, realize US CO2 could go to zero and it won´t affect the planet. 2. Get out of the UN. 3. Secure the border. 4. Eliminate at least 2 fed. agencies. 5. No new immigration from Middle East and Africa. 6. Term limits. You can do plenty without mentioning abortion or gay marriage. But not in the GOP.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Spidey, 3/19/2013 7:50:17 AM (No. 9232487)
`The dems have a unifying entity of keeping them together and that´s the absolute fear of the Obama mafia.The GOp doesn´t have a central command leader that enough people have faith in.Two different styles of running a party.
I don´t remember any hand wringing or blood letting after the left lost in 2010.They simply said outside groups like Rove´s bought the election,no mention of an Obamacare backlash or anything like that. This is why people are still puzzled over how we lost this last election. How did we lose our momentum in 2 short years?
The short answer is the left´s ground game including cheating simply overwhelmed republican voters.It could be a big plus if the SC upholds voter ID requirements.Obama won´t be on the ticket next year will will help suppress lofo turnout.
The GOP establishment will never blame vote stealing because it´ll look like sour grapes but activists have to keep pushing for voter integrity.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Catherine, 3/19/2013 8:02:17 AM (No. 9232502)
Step number one should be getting rid of Rove. Then force RINO´s to retire. Start with McCain. Most importantly, embrace Palin. You don´t have to like her but millions of republicans do. It´s very elitist to snub your nose at someone a huge segment of your party truly likes and it doesn´t matter if you think she´s presidential material or not, she´s beloved by millions. Just pretend if that´s the best you can do.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
O.S. Banker, 3/19/2013 8:15:03 AM (No. 9232522)
Well here is my take on why the republicans lost. We had a skilled candidate who failed to comprehend the capacity (or lack of it) for critical thinking of the electorate. He made the mistake of assuming that the electorate would see through the hyperbole offered by the opposition and that the media would shamed and chastened into presenting facts rather rumor. If he or any of the myriad of consultants had paid attention to the trends in 2004 or 2008, the party would have done a 180 in March and started campaigning against the incumbents rather than continuing its internal squabbles.
Frankly, I am beginning to think that we need to stop running away from the ´old white guy´ image. Seems to me that John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, Renee Descarte, George Mason offered a lot more to humanity in one year than Mao TseTung, Kim Jong Il, Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, or Hugo Chavez did in a lifetime
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
gwmcclintok, 3/19/2013 8:34:25 AM (No. 9232561)
A political party is not a fraternal order. A party is something where people are bound together by a shared philosophy. This was Reagan´s spoken belief. I no longer share the Republican philosophy if it includes gay marriage, amnesty for illegals, and expanding the federal government. The RNC just came out with a report that was a slap in the face to conservatives and the base. A call for moderation of all things. Yep, here are your moderates: the Bush´s, Dole, McCain, Boehner, Romney, Nixon, Ford, McConnell, Rove, losers all. They will fight back if a conservative confronts them, but never will they fight back at the Democrats. See Rove replying to Palin, but never did so for 8 years under Bush. The Republican Party is dead. When something is lukewarm it is dead. It won´t cook and it won´t freeze, it will only stagnate.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
saucy, 3/19/2013 8:35:18 AM (No. 9232562)
Why is it so impossible for Repubies to stand on PRINCIPLE?
Stand firm on core beliefs and let the chips fall where they may.
Couldn´t be any worse than last two elections.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Pluperfect, 3/19/2013 9:04:03 AM (No. 9232634)
#16, how would you "get rid of Rove"? He´s a private citizen and, as such, is entitled to express and support any views he agrees with. You would deny him the same freedoms any other person in the political world enjoys? Those who don´t like him, certainly don´t have to follow his recommendations, but "get rid of"? In addition, "force RINOs to retire" presents a different set of problems. Who are the "RINOs"? How would they be "force"d to retire?
In my own view, until we can begin to reassure minorities, including legal Hispanic citizens, that they should not fear us but should listen to our ideas for improving their opportunities, we have no hope.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
AWAKE, 3/19/2013 9:15:41 AM (No. 9232658)
Hey #18. You will never get all Repubs to agree 100% on anything. Don´t be so anxious to write off people like Boehner, McConnell, and McCain. None of them are supporting gay marriage. OK, McCain can be a pain at times but he is strong on defense and is a firm vote against tax increases. He´s an easy win in Arizona and I don´t know if we could win a senate seat there without him on the ticket.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
stymie82, 3/19/2013 9:39:56 AM (No. 9232693)
GOP will never win another presidential election. The sheer force of demographics, combined with a dumbed-down educational system and widespread election fraud in minority districts means it is over the Republicans. The GOP agreed in 1982 to a court order NOT to challenge fraud if it involved minorities. Thus the party is helpless against outright thievery. A new party must emerge from the ashes of the broken GOP.Facts must be faced.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
bigfatslob, 3/19/2013 10:03:58 AM (No. 9232740)
Since the GOP has a house cleaning and restructuring plan that doesn´t include the conservative base then they don´t need me. If I want to stand with groups of gays, liberal black and brown races and whatever weird splinter group I´d join the democrat communist party. I´m old and will wander in the dark forest until a party that has winning elections their goal comes along. I voted Republican for the last time. The democrats will win from here on with their fraud and Santa Clause candidates. It´s a sad state of affairs. The GOP needs the dummy vote not the consersvative vote so color me gone.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 3/19/2013 10:10:17 AM (No. 9232756)
I have zero hope the Republican Party can change ... into the Party that supports Freedom, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
None.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
M2, 3/19/2013 10:16:25 AM (No. 9232772)
Here´s the money quote:
Until it’s willing to call itself out more critically for its own failings — for its lack of conviction, for being so squeamish about the moral convictions that animate the Republican base that it can’t find a way to help broaden the social message outward — the Republican mainstream will remain an impediment to the party’s salvation, rather than its guide out of the wilderness
I understand the "first, you win" philosophy. That´s just basic common sense. But our conservative message doesn´t seem to appeal to the majority of Americans any more. That is the tragedy and the kernel of truth conservatives don´t seem to want to examine: How do you win with a message most voters don´t want to hear and don´t like?
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
weejun, 3/19/2013 10:20:04 AM (No. 9232788)
Amen, #23. This last election was the proverbial straw. the GOP couldn´t beat a guy like Obama with an absolutely horrible record in office. It is over, folks. I´m now an independent. Since the GOP keeps claiming that´s who they need to reach, my new posture for the "give us your vote" types is: "I´m an independent. What are you going to do to win my vote, GOP?"
This is a sad time in America. We are watching the demise of the greatest personal freedom experiment in man´s history, and those who have now seized control of the GOP are only hastening the end. It is sickening to watch this.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
AutumnJoy, 3/19/2013 10:22:42 AM (No. 9232800)
#22: AMEN! If the supposed "remedy" for the GOP is to submit to gay marriage, embrace of the millions of mostly illiterate parasites from Mexico and SA, and then cater to LoFo appetites, then the GOP which exists now is over. I am sick of political correctness, and this is what is at the very bottom of this type of "re-branding". I am done with it. The USA most of us on this site remember committed suicide 9 years ago. We are expendable. 2016 will see Hillary Clinton elected. How do you say "Good-Bye USA" in Spanish? After these interlopers, are in the majority (as are LoFos already) it is absolutely given that everything Americans worked for for generations will slide into the sea, euphemistically speaking, just like so many other great cultures did. The only other option is complete civil war. And given that our young men are being wussified daily in the MSM (doing laundry, preening before mirrors working on their hairdos), good luck with that. Sorry for the rant.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
chicodon, 3/19/2013 10:29:16 AM (No. 9232827)
Are we are headed toward a British style of Dem left and Dem center? They call themselves center left and center right but, basically, you vote on which side can best manage the socialist bureaucracy. I don´t think there is much of a true Conservative presence. (Maybe Attercliffe can correct me if I´m wrong)
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
GreatPlains, 3/19/2013 12:51:59 PM (No. 9233191)
# 16 You want to get " rid of " a private citizen ? You sound like Obama with his drone program. Freedom is an empty expression for many conservatives. Karl Rove is a private citizen, unaffiliated with the RNC , who spent months and months , on his own dime , traveling the country and raising money for Republicans. He supported Tea Party candidates with millions in 2010 and 2012 . His ads were terrific-some may still be available on the net. The Republicans did not lose because of Karl Rove´s great ads. The guy actually deserves a medal. BTW- How many millions did Palin´s PAC spend running ads ? Or Rush Limbaugh ? Or Mark Levin ? Republicans lost because stupid loud mouth Republicans happily validate every negative stereotype the Democrats and media say about us. Rush Limbaugh and his 3 days of offensive Fluke lies cost us the votes of young women and other demographics. He damaged the cause terribly. Akin and Mordouck validated that Republicans live in the dark ages and hate science. The country has shifted in demographics and priorities. The RNC recognizes this , many Republican consultants recognize this ,yet, many conservatives insist that 2013 is just like 1980. The Census Bureau reports that the US has 21 million teens between 15 and 19. A good percentage will be voting in the next elections. Republicans are wise and strategic to try and reach as many demographics as possible. The resistance and anger from the far right because the RNC wants to update the conservative message and bring forth new messengers is mind boggling. I fear that 2014 is slipping away.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Butch59, 3/19/2013 12:53:02 PM (No. 9233197)
#27 May I join your rant? You have expressed my thoughts perfectly.
A Republican party that most of us knew years ago no longer exists. For that matter, the same applies to the Dims. They have become more and more socialist and have been able, by buying votes via Santa Clause, while the Republicans have become a "me too" party. Controled by RINO´s. At this point in time, I don´t know when I´m going to stand, politically. I guess I´m a CONSERVATIVE Indepentant.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Penney, 3/19/2013 1:40:43 PM (No. 9233291)
What choice do the American people have if the GOP platform simply rolls over again and morphs into the statist dem´s agenda? Two parties running on the same platform does NOT give the voters an fair & even choice!!!
American voters have always strived to make the country´s policy decisions THROUGH their choices of their representation within our government by those elected public servants whom the voters discern are both, (-HOPEFULLY!!), ethical and who stand firm upon the voter´s party platform which is also voted on by the citizen-delegates at each party convention. GOP voters definately do not want anymore devious ´GOP´ pols who campaign right but then do a 180o by governing left!!!
The dem pols elected these days run left and govern LEFT-ER!!! -YIKES!!! Enough already! Voters demand a choice on public policy as is their Constitutional Right to rely upon!!
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
dman, 3/19/2013 2:03:31 PM (No. 9233340)
The article and above posts only provide more motivation for a new party. Let the RNC go its own way - no need to "remove" anyone. Conservatives can remove themselves and set up their own shop.
Then the electorate will have a clear choice: Democrat, Democrat_Lite, or Conservative. Bold colors, and only one pastel. They will vote based on what they really believe, and events as Obamacare and its consequences unfold. They will decide, and let the RNC consultants be damned.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
ivehadit, 3/19/2013 2:04:59 PM (No. 9233344)
Lookit...we need a MASSIVE P.R. campaign. I say, take out massive ads on a regular basis NOW and run until Nov. ´14.
We don´t need to splinter which pleases democrats tremendously and are laughing their behinds off when they read about that. Our tent IS big and it is fine. And WE have the SUPERSTARS now, NOT the dems...tired, stale old party that they are...hehehe.
In the meantime, prepare for the worst, expect the best. These are VERY dangerous times. Let´s hope we survive to SEE Nov. ´14.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Catherine, 3/19/2013 2:12:30 PM (No. 9233358)
Oh for god´s sake. I also wrote post # 16 - by ´getting rid´ of Rove, I meant firing him from any position of importance in the Republican Party. It´s always amazes me how out of joint so many people get when they totally misunderstand something as simple as "get rid of Rove." The Title on the post was The GOP Establishment´s Bid For Change. My bid: fire Rove. Hope that clears this up.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
lana720, 3/19/2013 2:44:45 PM (No. 9233408)
It doesn´t need to be changed as much as purged of all non-conservatives in the Old Guard - RINOs.
Growth and opportunities are housed within truly conservative ideas. Period!
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
flatwater, 3/19/2013 4:04:30 PM (No. 9233547)
I told the GOP to stop calling me asking for money.
When I get conservative leadership, I´ll start contributing again.
Until then, they can go pound sand.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
tocsin, 3/19/2013 4:05:16 PM (No. 9233549)
2 passing questions: What kind of a general(Rinse Prebush)stands up before a 5th Column and announces his battle plans? Are the Elite Establishment Republicans treacherous or just really stupid?
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
BetseyRoss, 3/19/2013 6:07:42 PM (No. 9233741)
The Republicans are trying to be treacherous, but it comes out that they are just plain stupid. They fear losing their power to the grass roots. They hire consultants who are also stupid. With this kind of record going for them it should be easy to take over the party.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
rsgonner, 3/19/2013 6:33:25 PM (No. 9233770)
The republican party´s problem is simple: the entrained thinking of the "insiders" like Reince. They don´t listen. Romney had Obozo on the ropes after the first debate, but insisted on calling this communist "a good family man in over his head". Balderdash! Listening to the likes of Reince and Rove snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Now they double down on idiocy.
I have stopped being a republican (I had been a dues paying member of the Waukesha Wisconsin branch). Now I am an independent . Years of trying to get these hacks to listen to my ideas, and sending them thousands of dollars, has finally galvanized me to action. I am a conservative, not a republican. I will explode in my support in the primaries. Yes, I´ll support the most conservative candidate in the general election, but not one dime for the Republican Party.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
doctorfixit, 3/19/2013 8:51:09 PM (No. 9233917)
I don´t know what the GOP stands for, except for lower taxes. On that they have been consistent. Other than lower taxes, the GOP is mush. This country is now majority More Free Stuff voters, so it probably doesn´t matter.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
HisHandmaiden, 3/19/2013 8:54:48 PM (No. 9233921)
Get Ben Carson as GOP Nominee beginning now...
He will ´reach out´ to Everyone and save your $10MM...
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 3/19/2013 11:45:17 PM (No. 9234176)
Look at what the purist liberals have done to the democrat party. it no longer exists and is now the Liberal progressive party( long for marxist light ). Conservative democrats ran to the republican and were hailed at first. Now the purist are very close to demolishing the Republicans. RINO is the most disruptive label that dooms fiscal conservatism with a more moderate political outlook to the same end. There is no longer a home within the existing GOP for independents who understand that social conservatism should include some aide and mercy for the poor and halting. Decent legal immigrants has been the so called rock the nation was founded upon. There should be no home for those who are jumping on the new morals of anything goes and goes. You have let a monger upset the entire meaning of America and now you want to blame but do nothing.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Whistle-blower questions military response amid Benghazi attack
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 12:47:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Republican Rep. Darrell Issa said Wednesday, as the oversight committee he chairs launched into a high-profile hearing on the Benghazi attacks, that the whistle-blowers giving their version of events are "actual experts" on what happened -- who could challenge the administration´s narrative. As the hearing began, one whistle-blower questioned Wednesday why more military assets were not deployed sooner during the Benghazi terror attack. Mark Thompson, a former Marine and official with the State Department´s Counterterrorism Bureau, said he was rebuffed by the White House when he asked for a specialized team -- known as a FEST team --
|
|
Mitt on Marriage
|
|
American Spectator, by Aaron Goldstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 6:23:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney got under the craw of the liberal intelligentsia concerning his remarks about marriage during his commencement address to graduates at Southern Virginia University last month: This is a promise: “Launch out into the deep, and your nets will be filled.” How do you do that? Well, getting married is one way to launch into the deep. I’m so glad I found Ann when I was still so young. Combining your life with another person, particularly someone—men and women as different as we are, this combination is tremendously challenging and enormously rewarding.
|
|
Which Lives Matter to the Media
|
|
Commentary Magazine, by Jonathan S. Tobin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 6:15:39 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Last month, the American media had a brief moment of accountability when many in the press and broadcast networks acknowledged that they had largely ignored the case of Kermit Gosnell. The trial of the murderous Philadelphia abortionist flew below the radar for weeks. But some journalists were willing to fess up to the fact that their lack of interest in a sensational crime had something to do with their lack of comfort in discussing a case that might throw a shadow on an issue most in the media see as pitting an enlightened advocacy of “choice”
|
|
What if Al Gore had won?
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Noemie Emery
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 6:06:58 AM
Post Reply
|
|
It started with reports that former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra O´Connor had second thoughts on the court´s decision to rule on the issue of George W. Bush v. Albert G. Gore, followed by dedication of the George W. Bush Presidential Library in Texas. Together, those events brought on a flutter of Gore nostalgia, a longing of sorts for his alternative presidency; the dream one that never took place. Since 2001 it had been the destination of choice in liberal fantasies, wherein Saddam Hussein was contained without bluster or bloodshed, terrorist attacks were derailed
|
How Did Progressive Journalists Get Pigford So Wrong?
|
|
Atlantic, by Conor Friedersdorf
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 6:03:48 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Dan Foster, a young staffer at National Review, published a 2010 story about a class-action lawsuit against the federal government that resulted in "the waste of billions of dollars" and "systemic fraud implicating top federal officials." He wrote that the scandal touched President Obama himself, that countless payouts were made to people falsely claiming racial discrimination, and that more fraud was likely in successor lawsuits filed on behalf of women and Hispanics. Two days after the National Review story appeared online, Nancy Scola, a progressive journalist, commented on the same suit at The American Prospect. "This is one of those times
|
Dem to Judge: Go Easy on Jackson Jr., the ‘Highlight of Our Karaoke Nights’
|
|
Washington Free Beacon, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 5:57:25 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Rep. Marcia Fudge (D., Ohio) has asked a federal judge to show leniency in the sentencing of former Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D., Ill.), describing him as the “highlight of our karaoke nights” in a letter, the Huffington Post reports: “Not only is he highly intelligent, he is charming and entertaining,” Fudge wrote. “When things got tough or extremely difficult on the House floor, we could count on Jesse to bring levity to an otherwise daunting situation with a bad joke or a one-man skit. Jesse was the highlight of our karaoke nights
|
Lauryn Hill Blames Slavery as She´s Jailed for $500,000 Unpaid Tax Bill
|
|
International Business Times [UK], by Dominic Gover
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 5:50:39 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Reclusive soul superstar Lauryn Hill has been jailed over an enormous unpaid tax bill. Fugees singer Hill, 37, was sentenced to three months´ jail followed by three months´ home confinement for failing to pay $500,000 to the taxman in the United States. Hill claimed the sum was outstanding because she had "withdrawn from society" after alleged threats against her family. She was imprisoned after failing to pay the amount within the stipulated two-week timeframe. During her trial, Hill was ordered by the judge in Newark, New Jersey to undergo counselling because of her conspiracy theories -
|
As Midterms Loom, Democrats Worry About Health Law
|
|
New York Times, by Jackie Calmes
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 5:24:48 AM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — As the administration struggles to put in place the final, complex piece of President Obama’s signature health care law, an endeavor on a scale not seen since Medicare’s creation nearly a half-century ago, Democrats are worried that major snags will be exploited by Republicans in next year’s midterm elections. Many Democrats also want to see a more aggressive and visible president to push the law across the country. This week Mr. Obama is returning to the fray to an extent unseen since he signed the law in 2010, including a White House event
|
|
Nightmare of rape & torture
|
|
New York Post, by Erin Calabrese*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 5:21:38 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Three kidnapped young women were starved, repeatedly raped — and then beaten when they got pregnant — in a basement Cleveland dungeon run by three twisted brothers, law-enforcement sources said yesterday. The tortured victims were imprisoned in a dilapidated, white-clapboard home with chains mounted to the ceiling for about 10 years before finally escaping Monday evening. Michelle Knight, 32, Amanda Berry, 26, and Gina DeJesus, 23, were treated as sex slaves — kept chained and taped in separate rooms, sources told the local ABC affiliate. They were also seen naked and on dog leashes in the back yard, according to USA Today.
|
|
Clinton’s Republican Guard
|
|
PJ Media, by Andrew C. McCarthy
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 5:15:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
With each new revelation, what has always been obvious becomes more pronounced: the State Department’s self-proclaimed final word on the Benghazi Massacre, the risibly named “Accountability Review Board” investigation, is a fraud. Yet, like the rest of the Obama administration’s obstructive wagon-circling, the ARB’s report continues serving its intended purpose: to thwart efforts to hold administration officials accountable. Even on Fox News, which has been admirably dogged covering a scandal the Obamedia has done its best to bury, the refrain is heard: How could the ARB report be a whitewash when its investigation was run by such Washington eminences
|
Two new studies: Gun crime has dropped dramatically over last 20 years — and most Americans have no idea
|
|
Hot Air, by Allahpundit
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 5:10:07 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Behold the power of this fully armed and operational propaganda machine. First, from the Bureau of Justice Statistics: Firearm-related homicides declined 39 percent and nonfatal firearm crimes declined 69 percent from 1993 to 2011, the Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) announced today. Firearm-related homicides dropped from 18,253 homicides in 1993 to 11,101 in 2011, and nonfatal firearm crimes dropped from 1.5 million victimizations in 1993 to 467,300 in 2011. For both fatal and nonfatal firearm victimizations, the majority of the decline occurred during the 10-year period from 1993 to 2002.
|
Rand Paul, Marco Rubio face 2016 bind
|
|
Politico, by Manu Raju
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 5:04:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Sens. Rand Paul and Marco Rubio are facing a big obstacle if they seek the White House in 2016 — and it’s not each other. State laws could force the two GOP senators into a difficult choice: run for president or run for reelection to the Senate that same year. Because in their home states of Kentucky and Florida, neither Republican can be on the ballot for both offices at the same time. t might seem like a technicality, especially so far out from 2016. But these seemingly arcane state laws could have real-world consequences
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Hillary Clinton — culpable for Benghazi from beginning to end
|
|
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/7/2013 5:14:14 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When it first became clear that the CIA’s Benghazi talking points had been altered, many of us viewed the White House as the prime suspect. After all, it served President Obama’s political purposes to claim, at the height of a political campaign in which he was taking credit for the fall of al Qaeda, that the death of a U.S. ambassador was down to spontaneous outrage over a video, rather than pre-planned terrorism. It turns out, however, that the State Department was the prime culprit. It was State that pushed back hard against the original talking points.
|
Republican probe of Benghazi attacks turns to Hillary Clinton
|
|
Washington Post, by Philip Rucker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/8/2013 6:52:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Republican lawmakers, who have spent months seeking to tie President Obama to last year’s deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, are increasingly focusing their probe on a new target: former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton. The GOP-led investigation of the Sept. 11, 2012, assaults that killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others now centers heavily on the State Department and whether officials there deliberately misled the public about the nature of the assault. Three State Department officials are scheduled to testify before a House committee on Wednesday about the Benghazi attack and its aftermath.
|
Turning on Obama
|
|
Amerian Spectator, by Ross Kaminsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/7/2013 6:19:30 AM
Post Reply
|
|
If ponies rode men and grass ate cows, And cats were chased into holes by the mouse … If summer were spring and the other way round, Then all the world would be upside down. Once in a long while, an event evokes one of my favorite historical images: the British Army band, at Lord Cornwallis’ surrender at Yorktown which sealed the Americans’ revolutionary victory, playing “The World Turned Upside Down.” In this case, the event is the dramatic change over the past two weeks
|
Seattle to melt buyback guns into peace bricks
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: maggie2u- 5/7/2013 1:13:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Seattle Police Department collected more than 700 guns during a buyback in January, and now city officials have a plan for what to do with them. Mayor Mike McGinn is expected to announce Tuesday that they´ll be melted into bricks carrying messages of peace, and the bricks will be placed around the city. The buyback program was announced a month after last December´s elementary school massacre in Newtown, Conn., by city leaders sick of hearing about gun violence. Private sponsors including Amazon.com contributed tens of thousands of dollars
|
Sanford gets second chance: On political scrapheap 4 years ago, ex-governor wins 1st district seat
|
|
Post & Courier [Charleston, SC], by Glenn Smith*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/8/2013 12:59:28 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Gov. Mark Sanford completed the trail to political redemption Tuesday with a win over Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch to reclaim his old seat in Congress. Sanford defeated Colbert Busch 54 percent to 45 percent, according to full unofficial results. Turnout was heavier than expected, with about 32 percent of the district’s 455,702 registered voters casting ballots. Sanford, who has never lost an election, returns to the 1st District seat he held for three terms from 1995-2001. It’s a remarkable comeback for a man many pundits had written off after his highly publicized affair with an Argentine
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee: Constitution implies a right to health care, education
|
|
Washington Times, by Douglas Ernst
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/7/2013 8:22:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee took to the House floor Monday night and implied that the right to health care and education exists in the Constitution. Ms. Jackson Lee, Texas Democrat, also made the case that the moral authority for such services is also derived from the Declaration of Independence. “One might argue that education and health care fall into those provisions of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” she said. Ms. Jackson Lee added, “I think that what should be continuously emphasized is the president’s leadership on one single point: that although health care was not
|
Mark Sanford wins South Carolina special election
|
|
Washington Post, by Rachel Weiner
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: supersid- 5/7/2013 8:55:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Mark Sanford has won the South Carolina special election in a competitive race for what in normal circumstances is a safe Republican seat. The former governor beat Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch, the sister of comedian Stephen Colbert Busch, for the state’s 1st congressional district. The AP called the race for Sanford early in the evening, with the Republican leading Colbert Busch 54 percent 46 percent.
|
A new ‘Dawn’ at ABC: Newsman becomes newswoman
|
|
New York Post, by Tara Palmeri
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:26:11 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Top ABC News editor Don Ennis walked into his Manhattan office on Friday in a “little black dress” and a brunette bobbed wig and announced to colleagues that from now on, he would like to be known as Dawn. The 49-year-old father of three said he’s splitting from his wife of 17 years to become a woman, or Dawn Stacey Ennis, as she is now known on her governmental records. “Today I begin anew,” she wrote on her Facebook timeline, where she debuted a flirty new profile picture. “Please understand: This is not a game of
|
Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News, a persistent voice of media skepticism on Benghazi
|
|
Washington Post, by Paul Farhi
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/7/2013 11:01:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
From the start, the Obama administration’s account of what happened in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11 last year didn’t quite square for Sharyl Attkisson. So the veteran CBS News reporter dug in, and kept digging. The result: Attkisson has been a persistent voice of news-media skepticism about the government’s story. On the air and online, Attkisson has questioned the administration’s timeline and its response. (Snip) While other media, particularly Fox News, have been similarly skeptical about the official narrative about Benghazi, Attkisson and CBS might put the story in a different light. As a much-decorated reporter from a news
|
Dem Sen: Second Amendment Not Meant For Citizens To Take Up Arms Against Government
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/7/2013 9:28:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) on states nullifying federal gun laws: I mean, let´s look at the context of nullification. Nullification was last used by Southern states to try to eviscerate Civil Rights legislation, to try to prevent states from basically enforcing desegregation and frankly, I think history will look back on this round of nullification as kindly as it did on the last round. It is laughable also because it is a total bastardization of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment is not an absolute right, not a God given right, always had conditions upon
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|