A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Charles Murray´s Gay-Marriage Surprise
New Yorker, by Jane Mayer

Original Article

Posted By:Oblio, 3/17/2013 5:00:38 PM

Political scientist Charles Murray has never backed away from controversy, but usually his opponents have been liberals. Friday, however, he managed to upset conservatives at the annual conference known as CPAC, where thousands of bewildered Republicans gathered to figure out the way forward after their party’s 2012 electoral defeat. Murray ditched his prepared remarks on “America Coming Apart” in favor of an impromptu admonition to fellow conservatives to accept the legalization of both gay marriage and abortion.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: fritzilou, 3/17/2013 5:09:42 PM     (No. 9229798)

Oh the adrenaline high for the NYT; their smearing of Republicans, their race and homeophobic accusations that have been aimed at Republicans. Jane must be flying high and the power she weilds; it must be the feeling of being the one true God. What a coup; Charles Murray bites. The drum beat goes on.

You can call a dog a cat, but it is still a dog.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: rasputin, 3/17/2013 5:11:25 PM     (No. 9229804)

In the end, the part the Libertarians always get wrong is that it is the godless-ization of this culture that got us into this mess in the first place.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: gerty, 3/17/2013 5:15:33 PM     (No. 9229810)

Didn´t the Bell Curve book come out way before l994?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: smcchk, 3/17/2013 5:22:22 PM     (No. 9229820)

I agree with him. I mean no disrespect to anyone but when there is no harm done to you by someone else´s actions, can´t you let choices be up to them?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: fayebeck, 3/17/2013 5:30:03 PM     (No. 9229830)

When the time comes will a same sex "married" couple go through all the steps to get a "divorce"? Bet not.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: bullhead, 3/17/2013 5:39:27 PM     (No. 9229851)

deleted by Taste Police

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: absalom, 3/17/2013 5:55:07 PM     (No. 9229885)

Traditional marriage is a bedrock of civilization. Since the dawn of man, it was a societal impulse driven by the self evident need to socialize children and self regulate sexual activity. Religious trappings, which came eons later, are tangential to the institution. That Murray, a glorified statistician, would, de facto, endorse homosexuality and infanticide; shouts aloud that Murray is both unprincipled and a coward; in mortal terror of the Zeitgeist. That he echoes R establishment thinking, says volumes about the state of mind and soul of the R Party; an institution fractured beyond repair and no longer worthy of support from any one who claims to be a principled and traditional conservative.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: balogreene, 3/17/2013 6:05:21 PM     (No. 9229901)

I honestly don´t know how I feel about this. I do know Charles Murray has always made us think about things. Maybe this is something we should think about.

I am a conservative, I am a Christian, I believe homosexuality is wrong, I believe abortion is murder. I believe many people in this country are misguided non-believers. They murder, rob, rape, are homosexuals, and have abortions. They will pay for their choices, just like my favorite Christopher Hitchens is paying.

It hurts me. I love some homosexual and transgendered persons, and wish for them the best. I also pray for their souls. Until they believe, they will not change.

We cannot legislate their beliefs any more than Muslims can legislate Sharia in this country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: TulsaTowner, 3/17/2013 6:08:30 PM     (No. 9229905)

I guess aborting a child does no direct harm to me, but indirectly the act dehumanizes all of us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: theeo, 3/17/2013 6:08:48 PM     (No. 9229906)

SURE! Give up your principles for a pearl of some Gays´ price.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: aasilver, 3/17/2013 6:13:50 PM     (No. 9229913)

An open note to Mr Murray:

Muslims believe that one man can have up to four wives.

Should that be legal?

If no, then why not?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: noproblems, 3/17/2013 6:19:42 PM     (No. 9229923)

senility is hard to watch

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: veritas, 3/17/2013 6:28:37 PM     (No. 9229948)

Competence in A does not confer competence in B, in C, in D, in.... It´s that simple.

FTA: Murray, who is currently a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, is revered by many conservatives.

Yeah, well, true conservatives respect sound principles rather than "revere" people. Or is the magazine doing a sly hit there?

FTA: While [his adult children] share many of his views on limiting the size of government, and supporting free enterprise, he said, "Not one of them thought of voting for a Republican President" in the last election."

Well, no one taught them to reason carefully or examine evidence dispassionately, then.

As for his views on same-sex marriage, is the article is accurate, Murray accepted anecdotal evidence [even if from friends and acquaintances] in place of real data. That´s not sound reasoning, either.

On abortion, yet again the person who is the baby seems to be invisible. Again, shoddy thinking. But I strongly agree that abortion is a state matter, not a Federal one. And I´ll say that we ought to focus on: a. what the Feds can Constitutionally address; and b. policies to get the US "healthy" again.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: fritzilou, 3/17/2013 6:36:41 PM     (No. 9229960)

Response to #4

There is no empirical evidence that this will do harm. Gay marriages are a new phenomenon. Some children of those relationships have mixed results.

How will you feel if your children or a relatives children are told by teachers than they can chose their own gender. That is happening in Oakland California. You should have seen the looks on the children´s faces; utter confusion.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: runningdoc, 3/17/2013 6:41:01 PM     (No. 9229969)

I mourn for my grandchildren. They are the ones who will bear most of the burden of this godless approach to government. Libertarianism is simple selfishness. I want my way even if my way results in babies being murdered, and moral sexual depravity being justified. Woe those who call evil good and good evil.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: ramona, 3/17/2013 6:44:16 PM     (No. 9229977)

What harm can come of this? For starters, the rest of us who think that "marriage" actually has a distinct meaning and who value that distinction, will be set up as bigots and haters. No one will be allowed to express support for the idea of traditional Christian marriage. It will become a hate crime to oppose gay "marriage."

I guess that´s a libertarian´s view tolerance.....
Ramona (the Pest)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: runningdoc, 3/17/2013 6:45:55 PM     (No. 9229982)

PS, No Republican or Republican Party will get a dime of my money that supports the murder of the unborn or the abominization (new word?) of marriage. Have whatever party you want and can pay for. I will wait for a responsible adult to show up 2support. Who knows maybe Ben Carson would make a good President, someone who knows the value of human and spent a career saving it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: absalom, 3/17/2013 6:51:18 PM     (No. 9229990)

#16. Indeed Ramona. Very perceptive!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Patchy groundfog, 3/17/2013 6:58:24 PM     (No. 9230003)

Somehow I don´t think Charles Murray at CPAC would have merited a mention in the New Yorker if he hadn´t endorsed one of their pet causes.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: artman1746, 3/17/2013 7:10:57 PM     (No. 9230019)

I wonder if Murray has always let his kids dictate his values. By all means; if pedophiles would be acceptable to his kids why not embrace sex with children? Why did he write books? Just ask your kids! And after all, you need their votes. If Murray´s kids have that view then I question his bonofides as a parent.

GAY MARRIAGE AND HOMOSEXUALITY IS THE SYMPTOM, not the problem. Your kid´s values are the problem.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: earlybird, 3/17/2013 7:13:08 PM     (No. 9230021)

Another pundit bites the dust?

When we stop worhipping them, the lib media won´t have anything to crow about when these gurus seem to jump ship.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: QRP, 3/17/2013 7:22:20 PM     (No. 9230034)

Does it really make sense to have a Republican party? If they are just going to be Democrat Lite - why bother? The voters will figure out the real Democrats and kick the Republicans to the curb.
If we are a one party system, then we are a one party system.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: columba, 3/17/2013 7:33:10 PM     (No. 9230043)

Like Francis said: Gay marriage is an effort of the Father of Lies to destroy Marriage (and us).

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: PageTurner, 3/17/2013 7:49:13 PM     (No. 9230070)

I´m gonna go with the Pope Francis view of things. He´s the fresh new voice in the world, speaking the eternal truths.

Charles Murray, by contrast, in his capitulation and moral emptiness, looks like a has-been.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Starlady, 3/17/2013 7:53:49 PM     (No. 9230075)

The farther we turn away from God, the less we should expect his blessing on our country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: jorgecito, 3/17/2013 7:55:19 PM     (No. 9230078)

Too bad that Murray doesn´t see that abortion and destruction of marriage are the driving factors in the downfall of Fishtown.

Fishtowns everywhere used to be populated by people with traditional values. Most blue-collar folks were church-going squares who would get married, have babies, and work at a respectable trade to support their families.

Now Fishtowns are filled with single mothers on welfare, shiftless men, meth addicts, child beaters, and every social ill you can think of. Why? Because the old social order of church, marriage and family was ridiculed and destroyed.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: WAN2, 3/17/2013 7:57:35 PM     (No. 9230081)

Worshipping government (or God) turns believers into elites who think they know all the answers.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: jlw509, 3/17/2013 8:13:00 PM     (No. 9230099)

One of the downstream results of the deconstruction of marriage, sex and gender (and that´s what this is) is that it will become illegal to even advocate for, or try to strengthen, real marriage.

Do you think I´m exaggerating? Not at all.

They´ve already shut down Catholic Adoption Services in IL, MA, and CA because they wouldn´t place kids in homosexual domestic arrangements.

They´ve made it a crime to counsel a minor towards normal gender identity / sexual orientation, even if both the minor and his parents have requested help in strengthening normal psychosexual development.

They´re penalizing anyone involved in a wedding, marriage, or family related business if they don´t cater to sexual deviancy.

Gender confusion in very young children is not even being recognized as a problem: it´s a desired feature, even a proud achievement of the new revolutionary gender system!

Who´s it going to hurt?

It´s getting harder and harder to find anyone it isn´t going to hurt.

You don´t believe me? Watch.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: beancounter, 3/17/2013 8:15:01 PM     (No. 9230102)

Simple solution: Marriage is a religious sacrament. Civil marriage is state establishment of religion therefore it should be unconstitutional.

Gays can marry now if they find a minister, rabbi, etc. who will marry them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: neanderthal, 3/17/2013 9:30:48 PM     (No. 9230172)

The total purpose of marriage is composed of two elements; the raising of children, and the public removal of individuals from the "available" pool. There is nothing historically or ethically significant about love, sex, or economic benefits in the whole practice. If you´re not getting together to raise kids or to take yourself out of the "hey! I´m available" pool, then you´re doing the whole thing for the wrong reasons.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: mre, 3/17/2013 9:45:33 PM     (No. 9230191)

#30, you make good points. And that sounds like what Murray was driving at.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: JoElla Bee, 3/17/2013 9:52:09 PM     (No. 9230198)

Murray is revered by many conservatives.

Mr. Murray may be "revered" by many conservatives, but he is just another fallible, mortal man with an opinion.

What is the moral basis for homosexuality? What is their source for determining their threshold of morality? At what point do they decide a behavior is unacceptable - wrong? Pedophilia? Bestiality? When?

Many conservatives revere God and his word more than man and man´s opinion.

“With gay marriage,” he went on, “I think the train has left the station.”

We can choose either the train "bound for glory" or the one bound for perdition. That should be an informed choice at the least. The life and future of our country and our children depends on it. Our Founders and Framers looked to God for guidance. We must do the same if we want to survive as a free republic.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: tisHimself, 3/17/2013 10:11:08 PM     (No. 9230209)

Gay marriage should be acknowledged as the attack on the spiritual foundations of civilization that it is meant to be. The complementary nature of man and woman, male and female and the beneficial influences of a stable unit on the progeny that results, that really needs to be questioned?

This is a politically fueled effort of the secular world to deny the natural laws of a world not created, nor altered by human false sophistication.

If one has a right to marry one of the same gender, then why limit it? Marry your cocker spaniel, your mother, your sister, your entire family, your 67 Mustang convertible. Better still, marry yourself.
But this self referential attempt to construe the historical foundations of civilization, those moral cornerstones, ought to acknowledge in the broader sense for what it is: consistent with Marxist goals, the family is to be deconstructed so that the new moral order can be reshaped in the absence of the Creator. Good luck with that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: trapper, 3/17/2013 11:18:32 PM     (No. 9230263)

It is logically inefensible to give legal sanction to gay marriage and not give the same legal sanction to marriage between multiple partners - bigamy. And while we are at it, why not incest and marriage between relatives? Mother and son, father and daughter, cousins, uncles and nieces, brothers and sisters, sisters and sisters, gay or straight, monogomous or multi-partnered. One big, happy, related, "modern family." Assuming they are all adults, to quote #4 "when there is no harm done to you by someone else´s actions, can´t you let choices be up to them?"

Of course I do not advocate any of it. But can anyone look behind us say, 30 years, and truly not see the trajectory we are on?

To answer #4´s question, the problem with leaving the ordering of our civil society to the secular libertarian is that he recognizes no external moral law for regulating behavior. As a result, the secular libertarian has no more to recommend him than any other secularist. He is simply a hedonist with a sense of decorum.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: kahunavol, 3/17/2013 11:35:06 PM     (No. 9230277)

Eric Metaxas eloquently addressed this issue in his CPAC speech.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: Spidey, 3/17/2013 11:44:21 PM     (No. 9230284)

I always thought Murray had a brilliant mind and I loved to hear him talk.At the same time he had some level of quirkiness about him.From what I recall he suffered one hell of a backlash from the Bell Curve. He quieted down after that and probably still feels guilty about it.Maybe this is his atonement outreach.

This whole theory about caving to leftists to peel some of their votes is ludicrous.People love this new Pope even though he´s theologically conservative. People need moral guidance whether they think so or not.

This country has become one big frat house under Obama and it´s getting worse.STD transmissions are through the roof off the counter culture´s new definition of life like "hook ups" and "friends with benefits".

Women control a society´s value system and the left has conditioned the younger ones to accept things like free range sex,bisexualism and abortion.Not to mention drinking to the verge of unconsciousness.

Republicans have to stand up for traditional America,or pack their bags or become dems.

Dick Cheney has stood up in support for gay marriage,does anybody think for a minute he´s a new left wing hero?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: Quaestio, 3/17/2013 11:48:34 PM     (No. 9230286)

If Roe vs. Wade were overturned the states would have to then ban abortion. Does anyone think, that in a million years, NY or CA will ban abortion? The legal route against abortion is limited, the right should focus on decreasing it as much as possible. No one thought smoking would decrease without making cigarettes illegal, either.

The majority of the population does not think of marriage in terms of social stability. Today it´s just something you do when you like someone. The majority view is that only homophobes want to deny gays the ability to marry and get benefits and tax deductions. It is now a matter of ´fairness.´ Murry is correct in saying the train has left the station. Conservatives need an effective approach to restoring and strengthening the family and protecting religious rights. Sometimes it really is better to retreat so that you can continue to fight and eventually win, rather than being exterminated. Obviously people don´t want to hear this, but I think a long-term strategy is far superior to a flashy, but ultimately pointless kamikaze run.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: absalom, 3/18/2013 12:32:37 AM     (No. 9230312)

#39. Always amused when anyone speaks for the majority. Demosthenes, Pericles or Burke perhaps, but hardly you. As for trains, the only one that´s left the station is ´The Common Sense Express´. That Murray, a glorified statistician, would argue, de facto for accepting homosexuality and infanticide, confirms him as an unprincipled and shallow coward, willing to sell out for votes; the same thing ladies of the evening do for cash.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: Quaestio, 3/18/2013 1:25:33 AM     (No. 9230341)

I was not speaking for the majority.

Gallup - For First Time, Majority of Americans Favor Legal Gay Marriage. The date: 20 May 2011.

Something more recent, dated 13 March 2013, "Poll: Americans see gay marriage as inevitable," an article published in The Christian Century.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: chumley, 3/18/2013 4:23:31 AM     (No. 9230402)

Is it just my imagination, or has "libertarian" become something of a bad word around here this last week or so? I am a libertarian leaning conservative. I expect to be left alone and not forced to practice your beliefs, and in return I will afford you the same courtesy.
If you want to marry someone of the same sex, I dont care. I may laugh at you and call you weird, but really its none of my business. If you want to practice polygamy, I still dont care. I might even want a deal like that myself. If that makes me selfish and hedonistic I´ll have to wear that shirt. I´ll put it on right after I get home from work, finish paying my bills and taxes, mowing my grass, fixing the house and taking care of my family.

I abhor abortion, and could make the argument that it is murder. Someone innocent is directly harmed. The law does have a legitimate place dealing with that.

The moslems are absolutely certain that their religion is right and others should be forced to adhere to their moral codes. They believe it maintains the social order, which is more important than personal liberty, after all. Sounds a little like our religious right here, doesn´t it?

We keep talking about the big tent, then we shrink it to where only those who sit in our own pews can fit in. It seems unsustainable.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: Bumblebee, 3/18/2013 10:58:22 AM     (No. 9230866)

After reading some of these posts I have great fear for our country because the protective arms of the Lord will not surround us if we keep sliding to the ways that bring death, abortion, homosexuality [average life span 50 years] Love of money [Madoff?][too big to fail greedy banks] This time it won´t be a worldwide flood, but a worldwide fire. The blindness of Benghazi persists in our president and I don´t expect him to protect our country from destruction.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: absalom, 3/18/2013 1:40:46 PM     (No. 9231248)

#41. Uninterested in engaging in a urinary contest, so we´ll end it here. Polls, the fellow traveler of statistics, will give you any result your heart desires; just phrase the question accordingly. You might be interested in a new poll about to be released which has Astronomers buzzing and indicates that a majority of Americans now believe the planets are shaped liked cubes not spheres. Polls are the hand maiden of the trendy zeitgeist; traditions and principles endure.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 727492




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"



The Secrets of Princeton
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Piercing the secrecy of
offshore tax havens
Washington Post, by Scott Higham, Michael Hudson*    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 7:06:15 AM     Post Reply
A New York hedge fund manager allegedly swindles $12 million from a prominent Baltimore family. An Indiana couple is accused of bilking hundreds of customers by charging for free trials of cosmetic products. A financial manager in Texas promises 23-percent returns but absconds with $33.5 million of his investors’ money in a classic Ponzi scheme.All three cases have one thing in common: money that ended up in offshore accounts and trusts set up in tax havens around the world.

Former News Corp President
Chernin bids $500 million for Hulu
Reuters, by Ronald Grover and Jennifer Saba    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:49:03 AM     Post Reply
Former News Corp president Peter Chernin has bid around $500 million for Hulu, the online video streaming service he helped create in 2007, according to two sources with knowledge of Hulu´s sale process. The website, jointly controlled by News Corp and Walt Disney Co, reached out to potential buyers in March after initially contemplating a deal in which one would buy out the other. It is not clear whether that transaction is still being contemplated.

After Pentagon investigations, three
Army generals censured for misconduct
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:08:11 AM     Post Reply
After lengthy investigations, the Pentagon has determined that three Army generals committed misconduct in separate incidents, adding to an unusually long list of senior military commanders who have been censured over the past year.On Friday, defense officials confirmed that Army Maj. Gen. Ralph O. Baker, the commander of a strategic counterterrorism force on the Horn of Africa, was fired March 28 on charges of sexual misconduct. Two officials familiar with the case said Baker was investigated for allegedly groping a female civilian employee after he had been drinking.

Diplomacy downplay: Obama administration
minimizes latest North Korean nuke threat
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor and Shaun Waterman    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 7:02:06 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration appeared eager Thursday to downplay the North Korean military’s latest threat that it has the final authority to carry out “cutting-edge, smaller, lighter and diversified” nuclear strikes on the United States.“This is just the latest in a long line of aggressive statements,” (Snip)the recent tension between Washington and Pyongyang “does not need to get hotter.”The remarks were the first public reaction from the Obama administration since Wednesday’s claim by the North Korean military that the “moment of explosion is approaching fast” with the possibility of war breaking out “today or tomorrow.”

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Charles Murray´s Gay-Marriage Surprise
New Yorker, by Jane Mayer    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/17/2013 5:00:38 PM     Post Reply
Political scientist Charles Murray has never backed away from controversy, but usually his opponents have been liberals. Friday, however, he managed to upset conservatives at the annual conference known as CPAC, where thousands of bewildered Republicans gathered to figure out the way forward after their party’s 2012 electoral defeat. Murray ditched his prepared remarks on “America Coming Apart” in favor of an impromptu admonition to fellow conservatives to accept the legalization of both gay marriage and abortion.

With a Speech, Cardinal
Set Path to Papacy
Wall Street Journal, by Stacy Meichtry    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/16/2013 7:48:58 AM     Post Reply
VATICAN CITY—It took Jorge Mario Bergoglio four minutes to convince fellow cardinals he was their leader. Speaking in the Paul VI grand hall of the Vatican, the Argentine cardinal warned the Catholic Church against focusing too much on matters close to home—advice that came against the backdrop of a papacy that had been consumed by infighting among Vatican officials, a dwindling flock in Europe and secular trends in the West. The 76-year-old Father Jorge, as he is known back home, said Roman Catholicism needed to shift its focus outward, to the world beyond Rome—rather than being "self-referential," he said.

Obama in Jerusalem
New York Sun, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/16/2013 7:43:15 AM     Post Reply
When President Obama gets to Jerusalem next week, one of the signals to listen for is an indication of what country he thinks he’s in. Normally this is clear when the President — any president — goes to the capital of a foreign country. He’s in whatever country the capital is capital of. But Mr. Obama has been refusing to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Not only that, but he has been refusing to admit that Jerusalem is even in Israel.

President Obama bombs in
comments about a nuclear Iran
New York Daily News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/16/2013 7:28:35 AM     Post Reply
Approaching his first presidential trip to Israel, President Obama offered a fresh and foolish — if not feckless — assessment of the Iranian nuclear threat. "Right now, we think it would take over a year or so for Iran to actually deliver a nuclear weapon, but obviously we don’t want to cut it too close,” the President told an Israeli television interviewer, in the process cutting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu off at the knees and giving the mullahs breathing room to keep enriching uranium.

What Rand Paul got right
Los Angeles Times, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/12/2013 7:28:03 AM     Post Reply
I hope I´m not too late to the fight.Last week, freshman Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) held an old-fashioned filibuster against the nomination of John Brennan to head the CIA. Paul´s stated reason for taking to the floor and talking for 13 hours was that the Obama administration wouldn´t give him a straight answer on the question of whether the president can unilaterally order the killing of American citizens on American soil with "lethal force, such as a drone strike … and without trial."

No, 80 Percent of NYC High School
Graduates Are Not Illiterate
New York Magazine, by Adam Martin    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/9/2013 1:10:10 PM     Post Reply
An unfortunate story on CBS New York Thursday carried this headline: "Officials: 80 Percent Of Recent NYC High School Graduates Cannot Read." It´s a shocker, but it´s also untrue. And to make things worse, the story that followed was riddled with typos. According to the New York Post, which reported the same story earlier on Thursday, "79.3 percent of city public-school grads who went to CUNY’s six two-year colleges arrived without having mastered the basics" of reading, writing, and math, and had to take non-credit remedial classes to catch up.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Has Rush Limbaugh Finally
Reached the End Of The Road?

47 replie(s)
Forbes Magazine, by Rick Ungar    Original Article
Posted By: EveningStar- 4/16/2014 7:24:05 PM     Post Reply
Like him or hate him, there is no disputing that Rush Limbaugh’s very special brand of mixing right-wing politics with his flare for entertainment has produced one of the most successful radio programs in the medium’s long history. Whatever the burning political question of the day, millions of Americans have relished the opportunity to tune into Rush’s program, knowing that he would quickly take that hot potato, throw a few gallons of verbal kerosene into the mix and elevate the matter into a five alarm fire with a just a few well-chosen words spoken in the style only Rush Limbaugh could

Michelle Obama Riverdances
Through Dublin to the Tune
of $7,921,638

40 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Tom Fitton    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/17/2014 6:45:16 AM     Post Reply
When it comes to tracking the cost of Obama family vacations, there are two primary challenges. First, the Obamas are prolific jet-setters, so there are many details to track. Second, the Obama administration, clearly embarrassed by these lavish and frequent family vacations, stonewalls the release of records at every turn. But we have been relentless in pursuit of this information. Our attorneys file the lawsuits and make our case, and our investigators pour through pages of records and crunch the numbers. And the information we’ve uncovered – information that would otherwise remain under lock and key – shows that the

Why is US Senator Harry
Reid so concerned with
a local Nevada rancher?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Wayne Allyn Root    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:37:12 PM     Post Reply
I live in Las Vegas. I live and breath Nevada politics. Something is very wrong. Something smells rotten in the Nevada desert. And Senator Harry Reid’s fingerprints are all over it. I am of course referring to the Bundy Ranch siege. This was a dispute between a Nevada ranching family with rights to the land in question for 140 years and the BLM (Bureayu of Land Management). The government claims they haven’t paid grazing fees for 20 years. The result was a government assault on the ranch- including snipers with assault rifles, SUV’s, helicopters, airplanes and over 200 heavily armed troops. No

Which Actor Portrays The
Best James Bond?

38 replie(s)
American Spectator, by Jonah Goldberg and Taki Theodoracopulos    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/16/2014 11:20:22 AM     Post Reply
Look, everyone loves Sean Connery, particularly Sean Connery. That’s why he plays Sean Connery in every movie he’s in. People love that Scottish brogue so much, they don’t mind that he has it when he plays Juan Sánchez Villa-Lobos Ramírez, an immortal Spaniard in Highlander. The guy even won an Oscar for playing an Irish cop with a Scottish accent. Talk about sexist double standards: Meryl Streep has to master foreign dialects to get her golden statuettes. Connery just has to show up on time. In economics you devalue a currency by printing too much of it. In film you

Elizabeth Warren whines about coverage
of her fraudulent Indian claim

35 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Patrick Howley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:54:52 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in her forthcoming book that she was “hurt” and “angry” by 2012 reporting on her fraudulent claim to Native American heritage. “What really threw me, though, were the constant attacks from the other side,” Warren wrote in her book “A Fighting Chance.” “I would almost persuade myself that I was starting to get the hang of full-throttle campaigning and then — bam! Out of left field, the state Republican Party, or the Brown campaign, or some blogger, would launch a rocket at me,” Warren wrote, adding, ”I was stunned by the attacks.” This reporter (blogger?) reported extensively

Former US president joins
opposition to Keystone XL

33 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Jennifer A. Dlouhy    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 10:32:12 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Former President Jimmy Carter joined fellow Nobel laureates Wednesday in opposing Keystone XL, insisting that approving the pipeline would trigger “more climate upheaval” around the globe. In an open letter to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, Carter and the nine other Nobel Peace Prize winners bluntly warned the leaders: “Your decision on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline will define your climate legacy.” The missive, published as an advertisement in Politico, represents the first time Carter has taken a position on the $5.4 billion project and makes him the first former president to come

Fox News Poll: Many voters say Obama lies
to the country on important matters

30 replie(s)
Fox News, by Dana Blanton    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 7:39:27 PM     Post Reply
About six in ten American voters think Barack Obama lies to the country on important matters some or most of the time, according to a Fox News poll released Wednesday. Thirty-seven percent think Obama lies “most of the time,” while another 24 percent say he lies “some of the time.” Twenty percent of voters say “only now and then” and 15 percent “never.” Click here for the poll results. President Obama has been accused by political opponents and media fact-checkers alike of telling falsehoods. Frequently cited: His repeated claim that under Obamacare “If you like your plan, you can keep

Rev. Al Sharpton’s Easter message:
Politically ‘crucified’ Obama has risen again

28 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Jessica Chasmar    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 4/16/2014 3:42:51 PM     Post Reply
With Easter soon approaching, the Rev. Al Sharpton on Wednesday drew parallels between the resurrection of Jesus Christ and the resurrection of President Obama’s political career. Joining the “Tom Joyner Morning Show,” Mr. Sharpton said that his message for this Easter is that “no matter what the world may do to you unfairly, no matter how you’re crucified — nailed to the cross at home, or in your personal relationships, or on the job — that you can rise if you don’t lose yourself during the hard times and the challenges.” The reverend went on to say that Christ endured so much humiliation and unearned suffering leading up to his death,

Wendy Davis will undergo neck surgery
28 replie(s)
Star-Telegram [Fort Worth TX], by Anna M. Tinsley    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 4:02:34 PM     Post Reply
FORT WORTH — Democratic gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis will undergo neck surgery today, her campaign said Tuesday. “After experiencing shoulder and right arm pain in recent weeks, Sen. Davis will have a routine surgical procedure to remove bone spurs and degenerative discs that are creating compression on the nerves in her neck,” campaign spokesman Zac Petkanas said in a statement Tuesday. “This is a common issue experienced by runners and endurance athletes,” he said. Davis, of Fort Worth, will undergo the outpatient surgery at the Fort Worth Brain and Spine Institute. Dr. Thomas Ellis will perform the

Obama administration gives Detroit
$100 million for ´blight removal´

27 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 1:36:54 PM     Post Reply
The cash infusion by the federal government is actually going to help the city pay pensions, even though they´re playing a kind of shell game with the money. As for "blight removal," perhaps they could start with city hall. Reuters: Michigan officials and President Barack Obama´s Administration are discussing a plan to free up $100 million in federal money to aid Detroit´s retired city workers, the Detroit Free Press reported on Tuesday. Citing two people familiar with the talks, the newspaper said the talks were centered around federal money flowing to Michigan for blight removal. Under the plan, $100 million

Michael Bloomberg: ´I Have Earned
My Place in Heaven´

26 replie(s)
The Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: Bill the Cat- 4/16/2014 9:15:28 AM     Post Reply
Former New York City mayor is pledging to spend $50 million this year to push gun control, the New York Times reports. For this and other deeds (such as taking on obesity and smoking), Bloomberg believes he´s going to heaven. “I am telling you if there is a God, when I get to heaven I’m not stopping to be interviewed. I am heading straight in. I have earned my place in heaven. It’s not even close,” Bloomberg told the Times.

Climate change causing fish to
lose their minds, researchers say

25 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 4/16/2014 1:35:05 PM     Post Reply
Climate change’s latest casualty appears to be fish — or more specifically, fish brains — as researchers say the carbon dioxide that’s being absorbed into the ocean is causing the scaly creatures to lose their survival instincts. In other words, the fish are losing their minds, The Daily Mail reported. The acid from atmospheric carbon dioxide seeps into sea waters, dissolves and ultimately lowers the pH balance, researchers said. The acidic waters then hamper the fishes’ sensory systems, so they’re not able to distinguish between smells any longer, the scientists went on. When the acid levels get really high, the fish lose their


Post Reply   Close thread 727492





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS