 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul Join Forces to Legalize Hemp
Reason, by Matthew Hurtt
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:zoidberg, 3/4/2013 2:27:24 PM
|
| Supporters of industrial hemp gained a powerful ally in Washington several weeks ago when Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) joined fellow Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul and Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) as a co-sponsor of S.359, the Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2013. The House companion, sponsored by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), has 28 co-sponsors. The bills would amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp, the domestic production of which has been illegal since 1970. Though manufacturing hemp is currently just as illegal as growing smokable pot, 10 states already have frameworks
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
youngtexan, 3/4/2013 2:30:53 PM (No. 9207942)
We´ve got far more important things to pass/block than worry about trying to legalize Hemp/Marajuana, ect.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
FunOne, 3/4/2013 2:34:05 PM (No. 9207950)
Ive always thought that a drug-free environment is best. But, given the way the USA is going, perhaps I could deal with it better if I were stoned most of the time.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
mitzi, 3/4/2013 2:51:17 PM (No. 9207999)
I was once dismissed from jury duty when I said I was in favor of legalizing drugs.
If people want to destroy themselves, who am I to stand in their way.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Susannah, 3/4/2013 2:58:44 PM (No. 9208017)
Read the article. Industrial-grade hemp isn´t smokable marijuana. People who grow actual marijuana out of doors don´t want hemp to be legalized, because it cross-pollinates with the grass and makes it weak.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Hazymac, 3/4/2013 3:03:06 PM (No. 9208024)
Libertarianism is the wave of the future. The Republican Party should have been inviting libertarians into the fold years ago, instead of alowing the Libertarian Party to get just strong enough to bend election results to Democrats´ advantage, as has happened dozens of times during the past decade.
Although as a Christian and a conservative, I abhor abortion and disagree on this issue with the libertarians, who are basically pro-choice on everything, I have concluded that the War on Drugs has been just as bad a mistake as Prohibition, which gave rise to the mafia.
The narcotrafficantes of today are worse than Al Capone, Lucky Luciano, Albert Anastasia, and the other la cosa nostra types by orders of magnitude. Back in the Nineteenth Century, cocaine and heroin were legal, and abuse of those drugs was uncommon. The megabucks in today´s black markets have corrupted politicians, police, and the criminals who sell the stuff.
My mentor WFB, a libertarian as much as a conservative, favored legalization of drugs. (He didn´t use recreational drugs and neither do I.) I realize that there some--even at this site--who are violently opposed to legalization, and would recommend the executions of people involved in that business. I disagree, and my disrespect for the abolitionist statists--conservative and liberal--is growing. It´s just another way to fatten our socialist-fascist government and erode our civil liberties. Leave people alone!
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
GraniteBayTom, 3/4/2013 3:34:45 PM (No. 9208086)
My wife wins a long-standing argument. She is in favor of legalizing pot, I have been against. I can see the writing on the wall. It´s now a done deal. I can live with it (especially since I don´t smoke).
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
yuban, 3/4/2013 4:05:56 PM (No. 9208136)
The GOP keeps moving Left. Hemp for commercial use is fine but to be spending time on this at this point in history is foolish. Libertarians are more Leftist than they are Right. Welcome to Rome, and we know how that all turned out.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
fritzilou, 3/4/2013 4:44:40 PM (No. 9208191)
Do they really want to drive us all away???
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
4Justice, 3/4/2013 5:01:30 PM (No. 9208223)
#7, you are wrong. Libertarians are NOT more left than right. I often agree with them because I don´t think government should be involved in our daily personal lives. I believe in freedom first. Of course there need to be some laws but we have become way to restrictive over the past 100 years. Drug laws neve really had anything to do with public health or safety--they were based on control and big lobbies (like alcohol) were behind their passage. They used the other arguments as red herrings. Alcohol is one of the worst and most destructive drugs there is...yet it remains legal. Think about it. Freedom or control? It is up to you.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
4Justice, 3/4/2013 5:03:49 PM (No. 9208230)
#8, why would that drive you away? Hemp is not something that anyone would want to smoke. But it does have lots of great industrial uses. Just because it is related to Marijuana doesn´t mean it is the same as drugs... It was silly to outlaw hemp in the first place.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Axeman, 3/4/2013 5:24:29 PM (No. 9208249)
Hemp is a 100% useful plant. Rich in oil, very strong fiber, protein in the seeds, waste products are great compost, and it grows, well, like a weed. It has almost zero drug quality. It is genetically adaptable for every trait, like fiber strength or oil quality. it would be an excellent ag product. Unfortunately it is almost indistinguishable from the drug plant.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino, 3/4/2013 5:28:40 PM (No. 9208256)
The government has no right at all to tell any individual what he or she may ingest.
The "War On Drugs" would be farcical - - if it weren´t for the fact that it´s been responsible for the deaths of untold thousands of innocent victims - - and has cost all of us trillions of dollars of our wealth.
Private intoxication is none of the government´s business. All substances must be legal for consumption based on personal choice. Public intoxication can be dangerous and must be monitored and controlled. But any proscription of intoxication on private property is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 3/4/2013 5:50:06 PM (No. 9208277)
I have enjoyed talking politics with libertarians. Agreed, they shouldn´t be is missed as loons who care ONLY about legalizing pot. They also tend to think conservatives and libertarians should join forces. Generally, an intelligent friendly conversation rolls along until I ask a question. Are libertarians willing to support pro-life and pro-traditional marriage conservatives? Uh-no. They say a successful politcal alliance would mean we give up that stuff. See? Just my (limited) experience with libertarians.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
canuckchopper, 3/4/2013 7:54:08 PM (No. 9208409)
I read somewhere that hemp will neutralize marijuana´s drug properties when the two are in close proximity. Can anyone confirm that? Might be a handy way to shut down outdoor grow-ops...
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
brdg, 3/4/2013 7:55:45 PM (No. 9208412)
Dems: Legalize it so we can tax it.
Reps: Legalize it to make room in jail for more democrats.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "zoidberg"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "zoidberg"
|
|
Will the Right Come Around on Pot?
|
|
Reason, by A. Barton Hinkle
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 3/11/2013 10:52:26 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Advocates of treating marijuana more like alcohol gained another ally recently: the United Nations. The U.N. would claim otherwise. In fact, the U.N.’s International Narcotics Control Board would hotly deny it. The agency’s latest report laments the legalization of pot in Colorado and Washington, declaring the approval of recreational marijuana use “in contravention to” the 1961 U.N. Convention on Narcotics.(Snip)Here in the U.S., United Nations disapproval can only help the cause of legalization where it needs help the most: on the right.(Snip)The syllogism is easy enough to follow: The U.N. should not tell Washington what it can do
|
| |
|
The Right to Self Defense Isn´t Negotiable
|
|
Reason, by Andrew Napolitano
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 3/7/2013 11:03:51 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In all the noise caused by the Obama administration´s direct assault on the right of every person to keep and bear arms, the essence of the issue has been drowned out. The president and his big-government colleagues want you to believe that only the government can keep you free and safe, so to them, the essence of this debate is about obedience to law. To those who have killed innocents among us, obedience to law is the last of their thoughts. And to those who believe that the Constitution means what it says
|
Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul Join Forces to Legalize Hemp
|
|
Reason, by Matthew Hurtt
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 3/4/2013 2:27:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Supporters of industrial hemp gained a powerful ally in Washington several weeks ago when Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) joined fellow Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul and Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) as a co-sponsor of S.359, the Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2013. The House companion, sponsored by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), has 28 co-sponsors. The bills would amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp, the domestic production of which has been illegal since 1970. Though manufacturing hemp is currently just as illegal as growing smokable pot, 10 states already have frameworks
|
|
Broken Justice
|
|
National Review Online, by Conrad Black
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 2/28/2013 3:27:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
I observed Washington’s birthday by participating in a Federalist Society telephone forum on the American justice system with two other panelists.(Snip)These are, in the briefest synopsis, that American prosecutors win 99.5 percent of their cases, a much higher percentage than those in other civilized countries; that 97 percent of them are won without trial, because of the plea-bargain system in which inculpatory evidence is extorted from witnesses in exchange for immunity from prosecution, including for perjury; that the U.S. has six to twelve times as many incarcerated people per capita as do Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan
|
State of the Union: Rand Paul Brings Libertarianism to the GOP
|
|
Reason, by Brian Doherty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 2/14/2013 1:31:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The official Republican response to President Obama’s State of the Union address last night was from Florida Sen. Marco Rubio. But the Republican Party is a house (partially) divided now, with a self-conscious rebel wing, and the semi-official “Tea Party” response came from Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul. Paul won his Senate seat on a Tea Party anti-establishment wave in 2010, defeating establishment favorite Trey Grayson for the GOP nomination. (He wrote about it in his campaign memoir The Tea Party Goes to Washington.)
|
Mitch McConnell, That Old Hippie, Pushes Legal Hemp
|
|
Reason, by Jacob Sullum
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 2/13/2013 1:39:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) recently came out in favor of legalizing hemp cultivation, thanks to the persuasive talents of fellow Kentucky senator Rand Paul and the state´s agriculture commssioner, James Comer, both Republicans. The New York Times cites McConnell´s conversion as evidence that the cause, long identified with hippies and stoners, has gained respectability among conservatives. The fact that it has taken so long is testimony to the plant´s powerful symbolism, because there is no logical reason to stop farmers from growing industrial hemp, a version of cannabis with negligible THC, even if you support marijuana prohibition.
|
| |
|
|
Everything Fun Is Illegal in Virginia
|
|
Reason, by A. Barton Hinkle
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 2/4/2013 12:27:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Only one or two centuries late, Virginia lawmakers have decided it is none of their business if unmarried couples share a roof. So the legislators are now working diligently to repeal the state’s law against “lewd and lascivious cohabitation.” Huzzahs all ’round for that. But do not unclutch thy bodice yet. Virginia law is riddled with antiquated provisions meant to govern the “morals and decency” of the fair people of the commonwealth. And while the law against shacking up apparently never gets enforced, others do.(Snip)Fornication remains forbidden under the Code of Virginia, Section 18.2-344.
|
|
The War on Pot: Not a Safe Bet
|
|
Reason, by Steve Chapman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 1/22/2013 2:22:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As recreational drugs go, marijuana is relatively benign. Unlike alcohol, it doesn´t stimulate violence or destroy livers. Unlike tobacco, it doesn´t cause lung cancer and heart disease. The worst you can say is that it produces intense, unreasoning panic. Not in users, but in critics. Those critics have less influence all the time. Some 18 states permit medical use of marijuana, and in November, Colorado and Washington voted to allow recreational use. Nationally, support for legalization is steadily rising. A decade ago, one of every three Americans favored the idea. Today, nearly half do—and among those under 50, a large
|
Hemp legalization effort gathers steam
|
|
Washington Post, by Juliet Eilperin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 1/14/2013 8:42:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the cannabis plant family, hemp is the good seed. Marijuana, the evil weed. Michael Bowman, a gregarious Colorado farmer who grows corn and wheat, has been working his contacts in Congress in an attempt to persuade lawmakers that hemp has been framed, unfairly lumped with the stuff people smoke to get high.(Snip)Bowman’s message is simple: Be sensible. “Can we just stop being stupid? Can we just talk about how things need to change?”
|
|
Who’s Attacking the Constitution Now?
|
|
Reason, by A. Barton Hinkle
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 12/31/2012 10:33:01 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Many ardent supporters of the Second Amendment are not quite so ardent about the First. And vice versa. A few days ago CNN host Piers Morgan got into it with the head of a gun-rights group. Now more than 87,000 people have signed an online petition demanding that Morgan, who is British, be deported for his “hostile attack against the U.S. Constitution.” But the First Amendment does not exempt British nationals, which means those signing the petition are also committing a hostile attack against the Constitution. The irony is probably lost on them.
|
Gay Participation Hurts Neither Military Nor Marriage
|
|
Reason, by A. Barton Hinkle
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 12/17/2012 2:32:25 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Did you catch the big story out of Afghanistan the other day—the one about how a U.S. platoon was decimated in a nighttime raid? The soldiers couldn’t fight effectively because their unit cohesion had disintegrated after one of them mentioned he is gay. How about the recent study showing it is now impossible to train new jarheads at Parris Island? Marine recruits are so afraid a gay bunkmate might be eyeballing them in the shower that they can’t follow even basic commands.(Snip)You didn’t hear about those developments? Don’t be alarmed. Nobody did—because they never happened. Yet they certainly should have
|
|
Government Spying Out of Control
|
|
Reason, by Andrew Napolitano
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 12/13/2012 8:47:10 AM
Post Reply
|
|
After President Richard Nixon was forced from office in 1974, congressional investigators discovered what they believed was the full extent of his use of the FBI and the CIA to engage in domestic spying. In that pre-digital era, the spying consisted of listening to telephone calls, opening mail, and using undercover agents to infiltrate political organizations and, as we know, break into their offices. (Snip) But many Americans did complain to Congress, which in 1978 enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, commonly called FISA. FISA provided that all domestic surveillance be subject to the search warrant requirement of the
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
McCain: ´I don´t understand´ GOP filibuster on guns
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"
|
Hillary Clinton Would Not ´Clear the Field´ for 2016
|
|
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Broadcasters worry about ´Zero TV´ homes
|
|
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
Obama Budget to Cap Retirement Accounts at $3 Million
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 9:40:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts. According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals "to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving." "The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per
|
| | |
|