A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


What does DHS need with
2,700 armored vehicles?

American Thinker, by Rick Moran

Original Article

Posted By:magnante, 3/4/2013 11:03:08 AM

More to the point; why isn´t anyone in Congress asking? You see a story like this - and the one about a billion bullets bought by the government - and you wonder why no one in Congress has bothered to look into it. I am totally unconvinced there are any dark designs by DHS on American citizens or our democracy. But this seems a colossal waste of money - if true - and isn´t ferreting out waste like this what we are paying those jamokes on Capitol Hill for?

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: mitzi, 3/4/2013 11:09:49 AM     (No. 9207446)

So they can safely drive the released illegal aliens back to their homes. /s


Reply 2 - Posted by: stablemoney, 3/4/2013 11:14:34 AM     (No. 9207459)

The National Guard has armored vehicles. I do not trust the ATF or any other unit in the DHS with weapons of any kind.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: coldoc, 3/4/2013 11:17:34 AM     (No. 9207472)

The paranoid incompetent napolitano shouldn´t be allowed to have anything but nerf toys. It sounds like HS doesn´t think the US Army or the national guard will do their bidding, push come to shove.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Thos Weatherby, 3/4/2013 11:18:05 AM     (No. 9207474)

Where else are you going to carry all those security people to use those billion and half shells. This is that other army Obama talked about in his first election. He´s building an internal army to go after us regular folks. The real Army would have a problem with arresting and shooting Americans, but this secondary army will do it in the name of security. They will be controlled more directly be the President. They should have sequestered this purchase.


Reply 5 - Posted by: PChristopher, 3/4/2013 11:19:26 AM     (No. 9207480)

I am totally unconvinced there are any dark designs by DHS on American citizens or our democracy. But this seems a...

Really? Is there another plausible explanation for these vehicles and 2 billion bullets?

And on the topic of grammar, shouldn´t it be a comma between ´democracy´ and ´But´ instead of a period or do we just do what feels good these days?


Reply 6 - Posted by: KanCreeper, 3/4/2013 11:24:04 AM     (No. 9207491)

And the rest of the story is?...As we used to comment between ourselves in the Marine Corps...Just get ready for the ram!

Back in July 2008 Zippy promised this country we were going to be "Secure".. Many took that as a reference to his creations of an "Army" of Brown Shirts(?) Maybe, Just Maybe???


Reply 7 - Posted by: lylacat, 3/4/2013 11:26:03 AM     (No. 9207495)

Does this make sense to anyone out there; please inform me what the DHS would need with about three thousand armored vehicles, and what is the cost for all this fire power? I cannot be the only one wondering what they have in store for us. I have quietly watched the procurement of billions of rounds of ammo, many of which are deadly hollow point bullets which tear through a body with deadly force. People, what is going on? Should we all be concerned? Why would 0bama be spending this much money on something like this at this time?


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: grambo, 3/4/2013 11:27:53 AM     (No. 9207497)

Sequester them.


Reply 9 - Posted by: lylacat, 3/4/2013 11:29:03 AM     (No. 9207502)

I would like to add: billions of rounds of hollow point bullets are not for target practice, folks. Hollow point ammo has only one purpose, and that is to kill.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Refried, 3/4/2013 11:31:57 AM     (No. 9207510)

Wonder how resistant they are to Molotov Cocktails?


Reply 11 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 3/4/2013 11:35:08 AM     (No. 9207524)

Does anyone still wonder who they´re planning to protect?


Reply 12 - Posted by: Freeloader, 3/4/2013 11:38:27 AM     (No. 9207544)

QUESTION: "What does DHS need with 2,700 armored vehicles?"

ANSWER: From The Desk Of His Imperial Majesty Emperor Kingfish..."We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we´ve set. We´ve got to have a civilian national security force that´s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

Sieg Heil Kingfish! You da man!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: horacer, 3/4/2013 11:40:59 AM     (No. 9207556)

The blog item this is based on is 6 months old. Time someone got more facts on just how many have been purchased.

The DHS put out a press release last April showing the vehicle being used in training. They claim it´s for ´National Security Events´.

http://www.dhs.gov/photo/hsi-using-armored-vehicles-training-ice

I don´t trust anything this bunch does.


Reply 14 - Posted by: wethepeoplecny, 3/4/2013 11:49:01 AM     (No. 9207575)

What the h3ll is happening to my country?
First DHS buys a billion rounds, then 7000 AR-15
and now 2700 Light armored vehicles.
The US military is very capable of defending us
against the muslims. Obama´s amnesty policy seems
to encourage the illeagal immigration.
So why does DHS and obama feel the need to aquire
all of this hardware while pushing legistration to
disarm us citizens?
Remember obama pre election statement about
building a home security force as well equipped
and well trained as the military?
Who is threatening them? I see historical parallels.
Pardon my tin foil hat.


Reply 15 - Posted by: texas_gop, 3/4/2013 12:16:31 PM     (No. 9207666)

1) They purchased the ammo to create a shortage to make it difficult for us to buy
2) They will not protect our borders but they will use arms against American citizens. I am convinced of this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 3/4/2013 12:19:52 PM     (No. 9207680)

Because when our government collapses from bankruptcy, the 47% gimmee-gimmee-gimmee crowd will be wreaking havoc in the streets.

That´s why and it is coming.


Reply 17 - Posted by: udanja99, 3/4/2013 12:23:06 PM     (No. 9207686)

The question I keep asking myself is this - if DHS does have bad intentions in the use of those bullets and vehicles, are there really that many people willing to kill their fellow citizens? I´d like to think not, but at this point it could be possible - zippy is doing his best to divide us.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: mickturn, 3/4/2013 12:26:11 PM     (No. 9207696)

Uh, so they can force you to accept Obamacare?

I have no idea but it´s obvious they are OUT OF CONTROL!


Reply 19 - Posted by: hotrod, 3/4/2013 12:35:23 PM     (No. 9207723)

To secure our borders?.....Hahahaha! Had you going there for a minute, eh?


Reply 20 - Posted by: dipi, 3/4/2013 12:42:26 PM     (No. 9207738)

"What does DHS need with 2,700 armored vehicles?"
Why does DHS need 2,700 armored vehicles; why do they need all that ammunition; why does obama care provides for a 10,000 civilian force.
I am not a conspiracy theorist but when put together, it makes me think this clown intends to remain in power by hook or crook.


Reply 21 - Posted by: woodsman, 3/4/2013 1:07:42 PM     (No. 9207780)

Keene NH a quaint New England town of 15,000 got one last fall from the DHS...with no real explanation of why...taxpayers were livid. Of course the local police were quite happy with their new "toy" probably thinking it would be great for the 4th of July parade....veeeerrrry creeeepy...they cost 293,000 each - They have four-wheel drive, a thermal-imaging camera, combustible gas detectors and a radiation detector - They are part of a $34 Billion "domestic terrorism budget."


Reply 22 - Posted by: Stlouislaxbros dad, 3/4/2013 1:28:31 PM     (No. 9207810)


...and our Republican party leaders in Washington say what about this?

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

The Republican party has become a joke.

The American people are crying out for someone to believe in...and the Republican party says nothing.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Gordon Freeman, 3/4/2013 1:51:25 PM     (No. 9207852)

#12 Kingfish. it fits 0 to the max.


Reply 24 - Posted by: drkillj0y, 3/4/2013 3:58:13 PM     (No. 9208121)

For use in ´National Security Events´

Just like the SA.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Smaj, 3/4/2013 4:44:15 PM     (No. 9208189)

The proto-dictators know the economy will eventually collapse; the would-be tyrants will use these to coerce/force us to disarm in exchange for access to food/life sustaining services. Trust me, and we all know this, there are PLENTY of people who will willingly fire on their fellow citizens (in exchange for the "security" of a paycheck, pension, status).


Reply 26 - Posted by: Trigger2, 3/5/2013 3:45:10 AM     (No. 9208777)

Now you know why Homeland No Security doesn´t have $147/day to incarcerate each criminal illegal alien.



Post Reply   Close thread 725850




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"



By his own standards,
Obama is ´self-delusional´
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/6/2013 9:03:24 AM     Post Reply
It´s one thing for President Obama to be cocky and overstate his prowess at governing. People are used to politicians grabbing credit, and besides, you can always rationalize when it comes to explaining why things didn´t quite work out as you claimed they would - "the sequester ate my recovery" being the latest successful-enough example. But sports is something else. The basketball either goes through the hoop or it doesn´t. That´s why President Obama´s history of braggadocio regarding his prowess at hoops is having a potent effect on his overall public image, especially with those who are favorably inclined to him.

Gays for Sharia?
American Thinker, by Pamela Geller    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/5/2013 9:10:00 AM     Post Reply
Over at Salon, Chris Stedman, the Assistant Humanist Chaplain and the Values in Action Coordinator for the Humanist Community at Harvard, has published a vicious piece attacking me for calling attention to the persecution of gays under Islamic law. This comes just days after San Francisco´s Board of Supervisors unanimously passed a resolution condemning my ads standing up for gays. Stedman and the transgender head of the San Francisco Human Rights Commission, Theresa Sparks, could form a new organization: Gays for Sharia.

Barry butches up with
comment on California AG
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/5/2013 9:08:13 AM     Post Reply
During his two day flurry of fundraising in Northern California, the President of the United States took it upon himself (and allow to be released to the public - not all of his fundraising comments make it to the masses) to praise the attractiveness of Kamala Harris, California Attorney General (snip) The remark, predictably, generated a little of what Allahpundit called a ´Blue on blue food fight." I suspect that was the intention. The president´s image as a manly man took a beating when he missed 20 of 22 basketball shots, all recorded on video.

Oh-oh! The dreaded i-word
starts attaching itself to Obama
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/4/2013 10:37:18 AM     Post Reply
We have already seen Peak Obama; from here on, it´s going to get rougher and rougher for Barack Obama. Even worse, the one word he must fear the most has just been uttered by a man regarded as a bit of a truth-teller among liberal elites. Joe Klein, the celebrated author "Anonymous," who wrote the best selling, truth-telling book Primary Colors about the 1992 primary campaign that brought us President Bill Clinton, has made it ok for liberals to apply the word "incompetence" to the Obama administration. This represents something of a breakthrough. Until now, it has been taboo

Where is Starbucks
Board of Directors?
American Thinker, by Tom Trinko    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/4/2013 9:44:12 AM     Post Reply
The CEO of Starbucks basically told a shareholder that if the shareholder believes in traditional marriage he should dump his Starbucks stock. Historically the job of the CEO has been to make money and increase shareholder value. It would seem telling people who don´t share the CEO´s personal beliefs, whether it´s gay marriage or abortion, to dump the companies stock is not a pro-shareholder action. This is another example of the liberal belief that everything belongs to liberals because they´re just so darn much smarter than the rest of us

The Coming Global Warming
Voter Backlash
American Thinker, by Jonathon Miseley    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/4/2013 8:40:29 AM     Post Reply
News is breaking out all over: global warming stopped 20 years ago. A political earthquake has resulted from a feature story in the Economist magazine because the Economist used to be a consistent cheerleader for global warming activism. Doubts about global warming used to be censored by its London editors, one reporter confided to Stephen Hayward. So what will voters do to Democrat candidates in 2014 and 2016 when the former realize that the Democratic Party was lying to them? Is it time to run away from the issue for Democrats, journalists, and Hollywood personalities?

Finally! School Choice
can show its stuff
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/3/2013 10:24:03 AM     Post Reply
The Great State of Indiana is about to test statewide school choice on a meaningful scale. This a major victory that has attracted little media attention at a time when the MSM narrative is focused on same sex marriage splitting the Republicans, and the inevitable tide of history sweeping away the evangelical wing of the GOP into the dustbin of history, or at least out of the its status as the party´s reliable base.

It´s Almost 3 AM and
North Korea´s Calling
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/3/2013 8:36:58 AM     Post Reply
President Obama has a situation on his hands where charisma and media support do him no good. He is dealing with a nuclear-armed regime with a history of military attacks, provocations as a means of extortion, and brutality. (snip) In understanding the North Koreans, an unspoken factor that must be considered is that the North Koreans know they are phonies, that they carefully distort reality to impress the rest of the world with how successful they are, even in the midst of economic collapse and mass starvation. North Korea is a Potemkin country

´Many American White Men
Worship Guns Because of
Sexual Insecurity, Entitlement,
and Profit ´
American Thinker, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/2/2013 8:54:09 AM     Post Reply
That´s the headline of a commentary piece at the website Buzzflash which is a blog from the far left, radical Truthout publication. At first I thought it was an April Fool´s joke - something The Onion would pull, so over the top it is. But this unintentionally hysterically funny screed is what passes for deep thought on the left these days. Here are some choice excerpts for your reading pleasure:

How Liberals Corrode Society
American Thinker, by Christopher Chantrill    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/2/2013 8:47:57 AM     Post Reply
In the girl section of the Wall Street Journal last weekend Matt Ridley had an article on nice vs. nasty, cooperation vs. competition. Researchers have found, he writes, that families that stay together cooperate better than families that are far apart. This is not the first work to find mathematical evidence that there are conditions under which cooperative behavior drives out selfish behavior... So long as there is little geographic mobility, clusters of networked kin and friends develop, putting an advantage on being nice. Who knew?

ObamaCare Bites
Unionized Educators
American Thinker, by Eileen F. Toplansky    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/1/2013 9:57:00 AM     Post Reply
As the proverbial offal hits the fan, adjunct instructors and their union leaders are understandably panic-stricken as they finally realize the impact of ObamaCare on their livelihoods. Union representatives are now sending their members letters stating that "the Affordable Care Act [aka ObamaCare] has defined full time as anyone working over 30 hours a week or 130 hours a month." Many of these hardworking and well-meaning local labor representatives, who were duped -- I mean, told by the American Federation of Teachers Union (AFT) that Obama was the one who would bring all good things to pass

A Tragic, Vicious Irony
American Thinker, by Russ Vaughn    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/1/2013 9:24:50 AM     Post Reply
Mark Kelly, retired Navy fighter pilot and former astronaut, husband of former Congresswoman, Gabby Giffords, is much in the news right now as he pushes for stricter gun control across the country. He´s popping up on the tube everywhere and Internet stories about his gun-purchasing activities abound. While he´s the ideal spokesman for liberals, a former warrior who espouses stricter gun control legislation, there´s a good deal of criticism building out there in the blogosphere.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

63 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
61 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

56 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

39 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

38 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

White House Blames Jobs
Numbers on Sequester

36 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM     Post Reply
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look

The Secrets of Princeton
35 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for

Obama Budget to Cap Retirement
Accounts at $3 Million

30 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 9:40:39 PM     Post Reply
The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts. According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals "to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving." "The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per


Post Reply   Close thread 725850





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS