Just sent ´em some bucks.

The tax challenge is the most interesting of the four, particularly in light of Roberts opinion during the last go round. The Supreme Court is not a backstop for every passed ball that the legislature is too lazy to properly construct, but Roberts left the door open for a challenge on tax issues. That would mean shutting it down in its entirety.

There´s hope yet.

FTA:"Thankfully, Chief Justice Roberts, whom I strongly suspect regrets voting to uphold it, looks to have another chance to bury it once and for all."
Matt Barber has more faith in Roberts than I do.

The origination clause might be tough to prove, but the religious exemptions are anything but ambiguous. There is so much that is clearly unconstitutional about Obamacare, that I´m not resigned to accept this as the law of the land.

I haven´t heard anything about Liberty Counsel´s motion. If any LDotters know what´s going on, I´d love to know more. It´s good to keep hope alive.

I have always believed there is a link between Roberts deeming it a tax and the waivers for those by decree don´t need to pay the tax...I have no kudos for how Roberts came to his decision but I do believe there is just enough here to keep the topic front and center

This whole obamanation is the progressive waterloo

I would love to believe we have a chance to kill Obamacare. Every reason listed in this article is entirely valid....

....but Obamacare was quite obviously unconstitutional the first time around, and for some odd reason, John Roberts simply refused to acknowledge this fact.

Perhaps Roberts gets a perverse charge out of occasionally raping the Constitution.

Perhaps someone has pictures of John Roberts and his boyfriend.

Whatever.

He has already demonstrated that he can´t be trusted on any serious issue. Given this fact and the fact that Obama just stacked the Supreme Court with two America-hating lunatics in Kagan and Sotomayor, I still don´t like our odds.

John Roberts, my hatred for you is boundless. The average twelve year-old possesses far more sense and far, far more HONOR.

Similarly, the Tax Bill on the evil rich passed the start of the year originated in the Senate. It is thusly unconstitutional.

Liberty Counsel and Judical Watch are both worthy causes for donations. They keep on investigating and acting on our behalf.

Whenever Obama puts his nostrils up, Mussolini fashion, you know that he is uttering "Constitution? I don´t need no stinkin Constitution."

Hopefully, the Supreme Court will toss out Obamacare this year, before it is enacted.

Apologies. Before ObamaCare is implemented, not enacted. It´s already the perverse law of the land.

i don´t believe any of this...we are done as a ´free´ country

Lets hope this is the monkey wrench in the gears of BOcare!

John Roberts and his boyfriend? You mean like this?
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=104&contentid=2860

Liberty Counsel and the ACLJ are both worthy of our trust and donations. They both do their homework and win cases.

I don´t think Roberts is gay, but even if he is, at this point, I seriously doubt that he would really care if he´s outed. He´s the Chief Justice of the Supreme court....for LIFE. Why would he really care if he´s outed in this day and age. And big whoop if he is.

First of all, Roberts might just be making his ruling based on the constitution. After all, the damn thing is a tax; it is going to go on your 1040 (if you have to pay the penalty for non-insurance).

Still, this could also be strategic. There is a way that this might play out very much to our liking. If this thing takes long enough to unfold, Obamacare might be overturned and then we see insurance rates DROP in response.

I´d love to see the MSM try to spin that.

I do wish we could "like" other poster comments. If we could, #2 and #15, thumbs up.

FTA: I wonder if that was his strategy all along.

The day after the Supreme Court ruling, this was being talked about on Rush or Hannity, if memory serves...the possibility of a Roberts decision that deliberately opened the door to the unconstitutional tax bill that would totally defeat Obamacare. Is Roberts that smart and that shrewd and foxy? Sure hope so. If so, and the court rules this time to defeat Obamacare, no one will be able to say that the court rendered a decision based on political leanings of the court, one way or another.

Were the critters even aware the Supremes ordered another look at Obamacare or were they too drunk on supposed power for life and attempts to destroy the GOP to notice.
Obama did not stack the Supreme court with his women..He did replace outgoing extreme liberals with the same type of vermin.
Gingsburg is the most likely to leave next and she is liberal too.

Hopefully, Roberts will do the right thing this time around and pitch the entire bill into an incinerator. The problem is, a great deal of damage has already been done which cannot be recovered, which was sadly extended by the foolish decision last June.

Frankly, I have no hope in Roberts overturning anything. He even allows Saddlebags to interrupt other justices.

The brief linked in the 3rd paragraph of the article should be required reading for every voter in the United States. Unfortunately I doubt even 1% could wade through it and come away with any useful understanding of the contents.

I said at the time that I thought Roberts was playing a deep game. I still think so.

For those that just can´t stand Mark Levin´s loud passion for his country- you may be interested to find out the large part his Landmark Legal Foundation has played in this battle. Just something he does when he´s not trying to turn off conservatives with with all that yelling.