Bravo, Mr. Walsh, there are more people with you than you know.

Try to imagine an article like this in the Lame Stream Media! Your head will explode.

Didn´t a smart man once say ´you don´t pick a fight with a man who buys ink by the barrelhead´, or thereabouts?

Juicers. That´s a good one. I´m hoping Woodward mans up to the intimidation and shows us truth to power. Remember that old concept?

Maybe Mr. Walsh is right, I sure hope so. This attack on Woodard by Obama and the media expose the corruption and coordination of the W.H and MSM and maybe a "Bridge to Far" for the leftist goons.

I find it very diffcult to have a shred of sympathy for this so called journOlista.

Woodward getting what he so richly deserves.

Excellent wordsmithery and between the lines content -- this article goes in my reread every Sunday AM library!

Excellent article!!!
Lefties used to say that sunlight is the best disinfectant. Now they run from it like exploding vampires.

In the Left´s world, it was so much more fun to "shine" a flood light on a Republican; but, oh no, we can´t put even a pin light on a Democrat, especially their mulatto-Marxist, "Dreamboat" prezzy.

I look for several "Deep Throats" to come forward and leaking documents extremely damaging to Obama and his administration. We can only hope and pray!

Woodward is still a squishy, annoying liberal ... for example, he hates the sequester ... but this is quite delicious. So glad they chose to attack this former media idol. It brought a little attention to the constant lies we get from Obama.

This fight will go away faster than you think. Tis said Woodworm know where many bodies are buried, and did until now, have a tendency to protect his lib compatriots. Should that worm turn, well, that would really be interesting.
They are probably watching his every appearance on TV very closely.
An interesting turn of another worm was made by ye old Lannie Davis. He first chimed in with his own experience of threats, then thought it through and said he got an apology from the White House and all was forgiven. Whfew! That was close Lannie, you almost lost your access.

I have been convinced -- as the country continues to deteriorate -- the liberal press will get an eye/full and start to question the "one".....

I never expected it to be woodward -- who took down a president because of a break/in at democratic headquarters (seems foolish now that WE have the bamster at the helm).

But -- God works in mysterious way....

LZK

If you watched the part of that ´´press conference´´ yesterday where Obama asked reporters to tell him anything he´s done wrong, one thing was clear from the silence that followed: they´re afraid of him.

If somebody had actually stepped up to the plate and challenged Obama, he´d be gone from the press pool and probably fired to boot. Nixon scorned reporters; this guy goes after them.

Great piece and all true. The people doing the ´regretting´ in all this will be the WH dweebs, toadies and lickers of boots.

The LSM is like the abused spouse. They are all neutered. They can´t grow a pair and go after anyone in government. Time for a replay of Woodward and Bernstein?
Question is , who is going to join them?

Bob Woodward is an anachronism, a relic from the golden age of journalism before it descended into blatant pro-Democratic-party propaganda.

So, if Bob Woodward wants to don his armor and take off after the Dragon in the White House, he will have to do it alone.

Watergate helped the Washington Post gain stature, subscribers, and revenue as Bob Woodward fought Richard Nixon, and nothing would help today´s Washington Post stem the tide of its relentlessly declining subscribers and revenues than covering Bob Woodward´s attempts to expose Barack Obama as the fraud that he is.

But the Washington Post of today, having degenerated into a mere propaganda organ for the Democratic party, is not covering the Bob Woodward story.

If all the good guys, Michael Walsh included, continue to call the bad guys, the destructionists,"liberals" and "progressives", as Walsh does here in PJ, then we are doomed. Walsh is fearful of calling these totalitarian monsters by their right names, so many right-on names: statist, commie, socialist, fascist, pinko, red, Marxist.....real names are endless. WHY do good people like Walsh not call them what they are? There is an answer...they are all afraid to call them what they actually ARE. Fear. Hannity, O´Reilly, Rush, Mark, Ann Coulter, most of these good people are scared to death to be semantically honest. The Marxists STOLE the good word “liberal” from the Founding Fathers back in 1920, it´s all documented, believe it, they STOLE the word (and “progressive”, too) and have been using it as cover-up for their covert objectives. And our so-called news reporters commentators of the free market persuasion have been allowing this semantic crime to flourish. NONE of these guys would call Hitler a liberal, right ? The Democrats today, all of them, are pursuing the same socialistic, fascistic economic and political goals as Adolph Hitler (too many republicans, too). Without spending one single dime, we, the good guys, can turn this battle for tyranny around by simply naming names, calling these Puglosi Reid Schumer, Obama, Biden monsters by their real names.Marxist collectivists all,no exceptions.

Even good ole Bob Woodward still calls these
trash the good name of "liberal".

Remember, FIFTY years ago, the great Ayn Rand called all these despicable destroyers of our nation, called them all by their true names totalitarian, dictators, socialists, communists, authoritarians, collectivists, on and on.

Get used to it, calling them what they are, it´s a lot more satisfying to know you´re not blowing smoke, wasting semantic time, being linguistically useless the way O´Reilly is every night, the way so many of them are just wasting time soft soaping these wreckers of our great nation. Wake up, practice these words in the shower every morning! Come out of the closet of verbal cowardice! Bob Woodward said somthing honest. Hooray for our side.

The dumbocRAT sycophants like Bob Beckel have decided that Woodward is no longer important, that his last 2 books were worthless, and where does he get his right to disagree with Obama. Beckel made reference to those facts at least twice on The Five this past week. These libs kneel at the knees of Obama, who actually was right when he said yesterday he isn´t a "dictator" only a president. I´ve written Beckel ( I do on almost a daily schedule) to ask him what he thought of Woodward during Watergate. Was he pumping his socialist fist in the air or was he saying what a hack Woodward was.
Upon posting this I have another e-mail heading for Beckel asking what will he do with his shotgun, once they are found to be illegal. Colorado is considering banning shotguns.

#19, you are, sadly, a modern don quixote tilting at these wretched commentators (on a daily basis, no less). NOTHING will alter their behavior until something truly cataclysmic occurs and i do believe that will happen but when we not only least expect it but when we are the least prepared. our only chance, short term, was romney and he´s apparently evaporated. there is no spearheading group (teapartiers have also evaporated)or individual, no widely read/respected conservative medium, and rush limbaugh can only do so much. sorry to be such a gloomy gus, but that´s the truth as i see it.

Stop praising Bob Woodward. So, he told the truth about sequestration being Obama´s idea.

Big deal.

Where is Bob Woodward on Fast & Furious?

Where is Woodward´s fearlessness on Benghazi?

If Woodward is only willing to call Obama on his political lies while still refusing to report on three hundred dead Mexicans thanks to Obama´s gunrunning to Mexican drug cartels, what good is he?

We still have HUNDREDS of questions about Benghazi. Note that Bob Woodward isn´t asking ANY of them.

Still think he´s a fearless reporter?