 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Woodward at war
Politico, by Mike Allen & VandeHei
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 2/27/2013 8:44:01 PM
|
| Bob Woodward called a senior White House official last week to tell him that in a piece in that weekend’s Washington Post, he was going to question President Barack Obama’s account of how sequestration came about - and got a major-league brushback. The Obama aide “yelled at me for about a half hour,” Woodward told us in an hour-long interview yesterday around the Georgetown dining room table where so many generations of Washington’s powerful have spilled their secrets. Digging into one of his famous folders, Woodward said the tirade was followed by a page-long email from the aide,
|
Comments: There have been many things I have disagreed with Woodward on. However, I am glad he is not backing down from 0bama and his Marxist regime. Maybe the rest of the media will take a lesson from him. Probably not.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
john56, 2/27/2013 8:52:08 PM (No. 9199859)
I wonder how much of a heads up Woodward gave Nixon´s folks or any Republican he decided to skewer before writing those pieces.
But hey, that´s life.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Grant Hodges, 2/27/2013 8:52:51 PM (No. 9199860)
I think the rest of the media will ostracize Woodward.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
nonsense, 2/27/2013 8:54:14 PM (No. 9199865)
I bet it was ValJar who called and screamed, she is after all, the Revenge Queen.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
ScarletPimpernel, 2/27/2013 8:56:35 PM (No. 9199869)
The individual who threatened Woodward is a male (per Woodward). Politico just posted this article at 8 0 this evening.....after Mark Levin talked about it on his show. Politico´s conversation with Woodward too place YESTERDAY.
Have any other reporters been threatened?
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
ScarletPimpernel, 2/27/2013 8:58:46 PM (No. 9199871)
Correction: "Politico just posted this article at 8 0 this evening"
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
lyndsey, 2/27/2013 8:58:59 PM (No. 9199872)
Obama made a speech announcing the withdrawal of our troops from Afghanistan, and all I heard was Nixon announcing peach in Vietnam. And ever since than...I keep seeing parallels between Obama and Nixon. Both paranoid. Both thin skin. Nixon was pragmatic and believed in the government´s ability to control aspects of our life to make it better. Obama is an egotist who believes in his right to rule...that he knows best an thus all should worship him. Nixon at least intelligent and loved this county. And deep down I think he was a good man. Anyway, it would be interesting to ask Woodward to do a compare and contrast between the two men and their Presidencies. Be interesting see if Woodward has finally figured out what a criminal really looks like...
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
spincut, 2/27/2013 8:59:26 PM (No. 9199873)
Just went to WAPO to read their version of this story. Ummmm... search engine must not be working, I couldn´t find it. Certainly WAPO will cover what Saint Woodward is saying.... hahahahahahahahahahahaha
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
schnapps, 2/27/2013 9:13:07 PM (No. 9199894)
#4 & #5. Point well taken. Politico was going to sit on this story. Kudos to Mark Levin for cracking this rotten egg. Shame on Politico.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
judy, 2/27/2013 9:16:40 PM (No. 9199902)
Hmmmm maybe Woodward...unlike the non media...loves his country more than the dem party.....
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Patchy groundfog, 2/27/2013 9:47:13 PM (No. 9199952)
No sympathy for the White House cretins except to note that they´ve never lost a game of Blackmail Your Enemies so it must be very strange to have someone fight back.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
judy, 2/27/2013 9:56:15 PM (No. 9199967)
The sad part is the WH is fighting Woodward while the repubs are in a deep sleep.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
hamrman, 2/27/2013 9:58:00 PM (No. 9199971)
You GO Bob, you have hit a very raw nerve and Barry is not very happy...but Barry needs to remember that you helped bring down Nixon, and he was 1000 times more the President than Barry can even dream about being! At least you are doing true reporting that the rest of the Lame Stream News Media is not doing because they are too busy protecting their Messiah and carrying the water for him!
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
penelopewaits, 2/27/2013 10:08:22 PM (No. 9199992)
Color me skeptical.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
lala, 2/27/2013 10:22:45 PM (No. 9200021)
Maybe the old dog has one more "gotcha" fight in him. Woodward is not a stupid man.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Philipsonh, 2/27/2013 11:45:04 PM (No. 9200124)
Administration policy starts at TOP. The President makes threats in public. No one can criticize this Administration without repercussions. Mr Woodward should take it right to them on EVERY policy that is damaging the Nation.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
thewarden, 2/27/2013 11:57:24 PM (No. 9200134)
You know, it is actually smart for us to sit back and let someone like Woodward lead the fight. He has a lefty pedigree which holds more weight with Dems. There is no way they can paint him as right wing or racist. Let more lefty journos jump on the band wagon as it gathers momentum before we climb aboard and enjoy the ride.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
albatross, 2/28/2013 12:31:53 AM (No. 9200152)
Well, I´m glad that Woodward´s a little revved up over this. Maybe something good will come of it.
Notice, though, the part where he says “I think if Obama himself saw the way they’re dealing with some of this, he would say, ‘Whoa, we don’t tell any reporter ‘you’re going to regret challenging us.’ ”
It reminds me that, in old Imperial Russia, some atrocity would occur in the countryside, and the peasants would say to each other, "If only the Czar knew about this, he would fix it." Later, in the Soviet Union, they would say "If only Stalin knew."
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Italiano, 2/28/2013 1:00:04 AM (No. 9200162)
The enemy of my enemy...for now anyway.
Nixon was a flawed patriot, Obama an America-hating Marxist. Comparing the two displays an ignorance of history.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
steveW, 2/28/2013 1:39:51 AM (No. 9200189)
So - merely doing your job as a journalist and uttering a single White House-unapproved truth about Dear Leader is to be "at war"?! How far the press has come since Watergate...
It´s the rest of the MSM who, as the dishonest propaganda arm of the malignancy occupying the White House, are at war - with Americans.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
mainelysane, 2/28/2013 5:45:34 AM (No. 9200295)
Woodward will cave.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Chuzzles, 2/28/2013 6:04:52 AM (No. 9200312)
Woodward needs to reread some of Obama´s record if he thinks Obama is not ok with yelling and threatening a reporter. Obama is perfectly ok with all this.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Fiesta del sol, 2/28/2013 6:07:48 AM (No. 9200314)
Happening right now: 6 7am Joe Scarborough and Mark Halperin are saying "Bush did it too."
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
beca, 2/28/2013 6:10:20 AM (No. 9200316)
oh looky barrys boys are out defending
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
M2, 2/28/2013 6:44:34 AM (No. 9200355)
Woodward, good liberal that he is, will cave like all liberals do. Someone will take him to the woodshed. Someone already threatened him, so don´t count on steadiness or character from Woodward.
What Woodward or someone else should ask this White House: "Do you seriously plan to risk American lives by cutting first responders while letting criminals out of jail around the country? And what are all those hollow-point bullets y´all bought up going to be used for?"
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
antiquegolf, 2/28/2013 6:45:35 AM (No. 9200356)
What poster 20 said. Woodward cares most about iaccess to WH sources. Therefore, this story will fizzle because bob cannot risk losing his version of dependence on big government .
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 2/28/2013 6:55:00 AM (No. 9200366)
Could this be the beginning?
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
OhMy, 2/28/2013 7:12:54 AM (No. 9200393)
Woodward is credited with bringing down nixon. I am cheering for him to do it again. Obama has dozens of scandals worse than watergate. Woodward was popular the first time around and was made an instant hero. Now he can be a real hero and a real patriot. Now who wants to be "deep throat" in the Obama Admin?
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Janjan, 2/28/2013 7:20:12 AM (No. 9200397)
Woodward is speaking the truth and the WH is telling him he will regret it. Of course it´s a threat. This is falling apart on Obama. He isn´t telling some fibs. He is telling some huge outrageous lies. This is better than a soap opera.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
OperaBuff, 2/28/2013 7:44:00 AM (No. 9200432)
Lately I´ve had an unquenchable curiosity about all things Romanov. I wonder why?
(Someone please attempt to explain to the lo-fo´s who the Romanovs were and what the Marxists did to them. Good luck.)
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Jebediah, 2/28/2013 7:49:31 AM (No. 9200438)
Fascinating to see Mika Brezghenski (squinting, which is what she does when she thinks she is registering "thought") on todays Morning Joe go´s on about this being business as usual, push back from some aid, and never mention that the "aid" threatening was Gene Sperling, one of Obama´s top economic advisors.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Jebediah, 2/28/2013 7:54:24 AM (No. 9200443)
A bit later Morning Joe (and Joe is such a jerk, even when he is defending!) showed a piece by another of Obama´s top guys saying Woodward MAY have been big time once but his is obviously past his sell by date. Let´s see if they can get away with trashing the man-----I doubt that he will back down. He is a Dem, no doubt, but he also has journalistic ethics that he tries to live by. Go Bob go! It´s about time someone calls to account our own personal Hugo Chavez and his cult of personality, which allows him to bend and break the law.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
MamaElephant, 2/28/2013 7:54:43 AM (No. 9200444)
HuffPoo is already isolating the target. Woodward is their headline right now, and they refer to him as a "drama king". The article reads like it was written by the White House. They admit that Gene Sperling was the one who yelled at him. The article sneeringly implies that Woodward is a whiny baby and even mentions that Mr. Sperling is not "physically threatening", as if reporters were afraid of getting slugged, not losing access. The threatening email is characterized as apologetic, but ol´ drama king Woodward is obviously too dumb to understand the words written in it.
The left now has it´s narrative - White House = voice was raised, but now unthreatening little Gene Sperling is apologizing for his decibel level. Woodward = old, entitled, has-been attention seeker making a mountain out of a molehill because he needs the attention.
Wonder if Mr. Woodward is sorry yet? Will he be by the end of the day? The White House is demonstrating exactly what the threat meant, aren´t they?
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
planetgeo, 2/28/2013 7:56:21 AM (No. 9200448)
Note what constitutes "war" to journalists today...merely daring to openly speak the truth. Woodward isn´t attacking Obama. Not is he attacking his policies. He was simply refusing to let a false version of the source of the sequestration go unchallenged. And now that´s "war". Pretty damning commentary on the state of journalism today.
And I don´t agree that Woodward will automatically return to the liberal fold once he feels the wrath of their ostracism. There are plenty of us former liberals now turned genuine conservatives here who understand exactly that this is Woodward´s "lightning bolt moment". You don´t need to get hit twice to understand what just happened.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
udanja99, 2/28/2013 8:24:59 AM (No. 9200508)
I´m currently listening to "Mornings on the Mall" on WMAL talk radio out of DC. Apparently Lanny Davis ( of the Clinton machine ) got this same treatment from the WH over columns he wrote for the Washington Times. The WH also threatened the editor of the Times with loss of WH press credentials if the Times didn´t reign Davis in.
Zippy is shredding the First Amendment. In a sane world the press would turn on him - we´ll see...
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
happywarrior, 2/28/2013 8:27:31 AM (No. 9200515)
#29, isn´t Romanov a vodka? Lol
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 2/28/2013 8:46:11 AM (No. 9200547)
The first thought I had when Woodworm came out with his concern, was he has now lost his access to the White House. The next move will probably be a walk back of sorts. In the meantime, in between time, it will be fun.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
JimS, 2/28/2013 8:57:02 AM (No. 9200563)
Obama: "I´ll get you, and your little dog too. Ah-ha-ha-ha-ha"
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
chicodon, 2/28/2013 8:59:14 AM (No. 9200571)
If this has legs Woodward will be invited on the Sunday talk shows. If not... Obama ain´t no Nixon. It´s a Teflon thing.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
LZK, 2/28/2013 8:59:17 AM (No. 9200572)
Hey -- maybe God´s trying to tell Woodward something....
Ya think?????
LZK
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
donnaclaire, 2/28/2013 9:01:22 AM (No. 9200579)
Yet another good example of how mean and ruthless our little man in the White House is. Birds of a feather flock together, as we see, and his bunch of high-powered thugs are proving it.
How sad and embarrassing to have Obama - a man of this caliber - as our president. It´s fortunate for us they threatened a reporter who is definitely not a right-winger. Surely some of the MSM will believe him.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
saucy, 2/28/2013 9:01:47 AM (No. 9200580)
Woodward started his career with Nixon, perhaps he is ending it with Obama.
Great bookends. s/o
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
lifelonghuman, 2/28/2013 9:02:52 AM (No. 9200588)
Woodward will not cave. He also will not get much support from the MSM. They´ve been jealous of him ever since Watergate.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
fed-up, 2/28/2013 9:13:04 AM (No. 9200609)
I don´t know. Seems to me Woodward is not going to compromise all his work to just cave now. He was trying to support his points made in his book, and if Obama Hadn´t been so "chicken little" all week, none of this would even be news.
This gets in the weeds now, because it is obvious we have an incompetent leader, and the WHAT the lie is becomes second to the drama around it. And rest of the LSM are comatose.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 2/28/2013 9:24:45 AM (No. 9200643)
I don`t feel the least but sorry for Woodward. He helped create this monster so live with it.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
Rinktum, 2/28/2013 9:33:25 AM (No. 9200671)
If this story has real muscular legs, I´ll be surprised. In the end, Washington is all about accessibility of information. I am sure Mr. Woodward´s reputation is respected but the knives will turn when his exposé is focused on Democrat president. I can´t believe that he wants to be the guy who causes trouble for Obama. He would much rather his legacy be taking down Nixon.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
Echohawk, 2/28/2013 9:38:01 AM (No. 9200681)
Bob Woodward is nothing less than the elder statesman of American journalism and he is speaking out against the Obama administration. This is huge! Also, he´s made so much money on his books and lecture fees that the WaPo needs him much more than he needs the WaPo. He can enjoy independence of thought and deed. I think he is trying to right the ship of state that is the American MSM. The 24/7 fawning over Obama is driving away readership. And money. We´ll see if this is working if and when more journalists start to criticize Obama. I haven´t watched ´Morning Joe´ since before the election, but if they are sympathizing with Bob Woodward then his strategy is starting to work. Regardless, this is definitely popcorn worthy.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
Farmwife1, 2/28/2013 10:07:09 AM (No. 9200756)
#22 I noticed that last night with Bob Beckel on O´Reilly. When these dimbos get backed into a corner by the truth, they claim "everybody did it!" Does that make it right? I thought bammy was supposed to be DIFFERENT! Yeah...right.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
rplat, 2/28/2013 10:28:33 AM (No. 9200802)
I hate to be crude but sometimes it´s necessary for emphasis so, let me just say that the main stream media is a puddle of warm puke. Thank you very much.
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 2/28/2013 10:35:01 AM (No. 9200817)
He´ll lose. This will drift away in the Memory Hole
Never forget Stilson Hutchins FOUNDED the paper for the express purpose of advancing and supporting the Democrat Party agenda.
Woodward is but a passing phenomenon.
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
geoguy, 2/28/2013 10:42:30 AM (No. 9200839)
Is this a crack in the dike?
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
DoktorFranken, 2/28/2013 10:57:13 AM (No. 9200867)
#1 - Quite a bit, actually. In fact, one time that he called one of the folks in CREEP (I forget just who) mentioned something about Katherine Graham was putting her "breast" in a wringer on "this one". I wish that I had more info, but the fact is that they DID call to get responses BEFORE they placed stories into the Post.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
jetsman, 2/28/2013 11:05:43 AM (No. 9200881)
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
jetsman, 2/28/2013 11:17:56 AM (No. 9200906)
The state controlled media will make Bob look like a crazed nut case before they will allow their lord and master, lord messiah o´bama to be seen for what he really is... A FRICKEN LUNITIC!!!! Lord messiah o´bama is being prepped to be New World Order dictator, according to Henry Kissenger in World Net Daily. The world´s people better keep an eye on lord messiah o´bama´s antics here in America because one day soon he may be doing the same to those countries and then NO ONE will be able to control him. The state controlled media will allow nothing to happen to lord messiah o´bama so in a few days this story will g away or the state controlled media will blame the republicans for what is about to happen and the sad part about this is over seventy-five percent of americans will believe the state controlled media´s fabricated stories.
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
Butch59, 2/28/2013 11:21:44 AM (No. 9200913)
I´m not yet ready to sign high praises to Bob woodward. He is and has been a life long liberal Dim and I just don´t think that he has made the transition to conservative. Remember, conservatives will give anyone credit for telling the truth. Especially when it concerns a morass of lies and deceit that the WH currently is.
And as for the WH threatening him, that´s really not even arguable. Of course they did. They do something like that to anyone who crosses their path. I wish Woodward good luck and pray that he doesn´t walk back on his word.
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
roger h. cook,MD, 2/28/2013 11:41:39 AM (No. 9200953)
Where has been Woodward the last four plus years ? Nothing from the commie white house and his followersincluding all most all of the media,has changed except for the worse.
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
ASAvet, 2/28/2013 11:50:03 AM (No. 9200967)
This will be forgotten in two weeks.....
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
strike3, 2/28/2013 12:10:15 PM (No. 9201005)
Woodward was able to bring down a president for simply lying to attempt to cover up a minor burglary. Imagine what he could do with four years of serious criminal acts, treason, election fraud and theft. I assume he knows how to watch his back because the threats WILL be followed up by action.
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
lencu255, 2/28/2013 12:17:45 PM (No. 9201018)
Now Americans with half a brain can clearly see the formation of the dictator (Americans with more than half a brain saw it earlier). Media is self-censoring itself very efficiently, except the "geniuses" with enormous ego, like Woodward. He mistakenly thought that he can say whatever he wants. Woody, it doesn´t work this way - no untouchables in the totalitarian society!
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
O.S. Banker, 2/28/2013 12:44:29 PM (No. 9201055)
I don´t think that Woodward will back down. He has spent the last four years in a fog watching the current administration pursure every course of action in an opposite manner that he, a devout liberal would propose. I think that the Drone Program and Gitmo´s continued existance are pushing him to a realization that he has been slow to acknowledge.
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
bob913, 2/28/2013 12:55:57 PM (No. 9201077)
Where´s his partner Bernstein? Shouldn´t he be speaking up in support of Woodward?
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
udanja99, 2/28/2013 1:06:37 PM (No. 9201099)
I think that Bernstein had a falling out with Woodward. Woodward prevailed and Bernstein disappeared. Bad blood there IIRC.
|
Reply 62 - Posted by:
mollyb0122, 2/28/2013 2:48:29 PM (No. 9201290)
Woodward has made the mistake of being a "reporter" instead of a stenographer journalist. Bernstein died a year or two ago I think.
|
Reply 63 - Posted by:
lencu255, 2/28/2013 3:11:33 PM (No. 9201334)
woodward, schmoodward, who cares! He is dedicated lib, who thinks that he can talk freely, while getting his paycheck from the leftist commie/fascists. Woody, you are wrong! Btw, all this talk: obozo knew, obozo didn´t? Yeah, stalin also didn´t know, and hitler didn´t know! There were russians and germans who actually believed in that.... I laugh at pundits comparing what is becoming of America with Europe. No, guys, it is not even close to that!
|
Reply 64 - Posted by:
flatwater, 2/28/2013 3:37:18 PM (No. 9201375)
According to Politico, telling the truth about Obama constitutes being "at war" with Obama.
Wow.
Well, what else would you expect from these leftist cheerleaders?
Our (p)resident is a corrupt, dishonest, powermad lunatic, protected by a corrupt and cowardly press corps that dares not tell the truth about Wise King Barky.
|
Reply 65 - Posted by:
Italiano, 2/28/2013 6:29:49 PM (No. 9201593)
Bernstein is still alive. He was married to Nora Ephron for a while. She isn´t.
|
Reply 66 - Posted by:
gesundheit, 2/28/2013 6:33:51 PM (No. 9201599)
An Iron Curtain has descended on the Washington press corps.
The proof that dictatorship is now operating in Washington is the fact that The Washington Post and other members of the liberal MSM are so weak and intimated by the White House´s threats against Bob Woodward that they´re fallen silent, or worse.
Not only are Bob Woodward´s colleagues afraid to speak up on his behalf and on behalf of freedom of the press, but some are even going out of their way to publicly bash Mr. Woodward to gain favor with the Obama dictatorship.
Bob Woodward has the opportunity to write a scathing expose about the Obama administration. He can travel to an undisclosed location to do so, if he feels uncomfortable in Washington. But will he? It´s doubtful that he has any more backbone than his cowering colleagues.
|
Reply 67 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 2/28/2013 6:36:16 PM (No. 9201601)
Well said #47 as usual. Notice the media immediately cut out Woodward´s comment on MSNBC that placed the Obama actions in the same status he did in the Nixon coverup. The first Woodward comment then was over the stupid attempt to shut up and lock up the high official´s wife. That comment om MSNBC followed his concern about Obama rushing around sounding off about crippling the military. Woodward I quote "This is the kind of madness that I haven´t seen in a long time." How much more direct can he be? How could he not then put it all on the line to call out Obama for his madness?
|
Reply 68 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy, 2/28/2013 8:50:22 PM (No. 9201761)
#39, if Woodward gets invited to the Sunday am faze the nation and meet the depressed programs, they´ll try to Palinize him, anyway. But, at the same time, I think Woodward would hold his own. Strange, right now, that I feel for the same character who chose to bring Nixon down.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
White House Says Benghazi Probe ‘Non-Substantive,’ Defends Early Talking Points About Attack
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Fred Lucas
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 10:10:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As whistleblowers came forward on Capitol Hill regarding the potential cover-up surrounding the Benghazi, Libya terrorist attack on Sept. 11, 2012, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney insisted the investigation was “politicized” and “non-substantive.” But he refrained from questioning the congressional witnesses making allegations that the administration has been dismissing. A reporter asked Carney at today’s briefing, “Do you question their motivation?” Carney said, “I don’t. I’m simply saying there has been an ongoing effort to politicize this. But beyond that,
|
AP Labels Official House Benghazi Hearings as ´GOP Hearing´
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Journalism, by Warner Todd Huston
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 10:04:29 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Wednesday, the Associated Press mischaracterized the Benghazi hearings as merely a Republican event, even though it is an official House committee investigation. In the headline of its report, the Associated Press downplayed the official hearings of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee--that has both Democrats and Republicans on it--into the failures surrounding the 2012 attacks on our embassy personnel in Benghazi, Libya. The AP characterized the official hearings as "GOP hearings," making the proceedings seem like a mere political witch-hunt.
|
Benghazi shows Democrats at most desperate
|
|
Washington Times, by Charles Hurt
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 9:56:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The party that swept into power on promises of transparency and accountability scrambled Wednesday to circle wagons in an extravagant attempt to protect administration officials, the White House and the woman many Democrats hope will be their next nominee for president. Congressional Democrats strenuously tried covering up the inquiry into the botched handling and dishonest aftermath of the terrorist attack on a U.S. facility in Benghazi that left dead our ambassador to Libya and three other Americans.
|
First lady: Christie an example of why ´Let´s Move´ is important
|
|
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Jonathan Easley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 7:40:21 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First lady Michelle Obama on Wednesday said New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) suffers from adulthood obesity and is an example of why her "Let’s Move" campaign is such an important initiative. Speaking Wednesday on the "Today" show, the first lady was asked to comment on reports that Christie secretly underwent a medical operation in February to help him lose weight. "The one thing I will say is that there are millions of people like the governor who struggle with adulthood obesity, and that’s one of the reasons why ´Let’s Move´ is so important,” she said.
|
Fox Analyst Shreds ‘Cowardly, Duplicitous’ Admin Over Benghazi: ‘Sacrificed American Lives For Politics’
|
|
Mediaite, by Meenal Vamburkar
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:47:07 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Ahead of the Benghazi hearings in which three witnesses are set to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade invited Fox News analyst Lt. Col. Ralph Peters to discuss the issue. Peters was unflinching in his criticism of the “cowardly” Obama administration — and the “establishment media” that aids it. “Is this a national security coverup?” Kilmeade asking, explaining that the witness testimony is expected to say the administration was deceitful in its handling of the situation. “The administration, facing the election, went into panic mode, wanted to contain it,”
|
Former White House Health Adviser: Obamacare Will Work Just Fine...by 2016
|
|
Reason Magazine, by Peter Suderman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:39:31 AM
Post Reply
|
|
For a good idea of how anxious Obamacare supporters are about the law´s rollout, read former White House health adviser Ezekiel Emanuel´s op-ed in The Wall Street Journal this morning: Transforming the U.S. health-care system—which is larger than the economy of France—is one of the most daunting administrative tasks government has ever confronted. There will be bumps in the road; this is inevitable. Setting up the exchanges will pose a host of technological challenges, such as digitally linking an individual´s IRS information (which determines a subsidy level) to the insurance offerings in the individual´s home area
|
Good news from Sheila Jackson Lee: The Constitution implies a right to health care and education
|
|
Hot Air, by Allahpundit
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:36:10 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Laugh if you must but it’s no goofier than the idea that “due process” implies a substantive right to kill a baby in the womb but not five minutes later, after it’s emerged. Bsides, Jackson Lee’s been consistent on this. Back in January 2011, right after the new Republican House majority was sworn in, she started arguing that repealing O-Care would amount to a deprivation of due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. There’s a certain ruthless logic in her reaching for the Constitution right after the Democrats’ hold on power began to slip in
|
A new ‘Dawn’ at ABC: Newsman becomes newswoman
|
|
New York Post, by Tara Palmeri
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:26:11 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Top ABC News editor Don Ennis walked into his Manhattan office on Friday in a “little black dress” and a brunette bobbed wig and announced to colleagues that from now on, he would like to be known as Dawn. The 49-year-old father of three said he’s splitting from his wife of 17 years to become a woman, or Dawn Stacey Ennis, as she is now known on her governmental records. “Today I begin anew,” she wrote on her Facebook timeline, where she debuted a flirty new profile picture. “Please understand: This is not a game of
|
For Sen. Mike Lee, amending immigration bill starts with throwing it out
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Byron York
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:16:26 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Tuesday at 5:00 p.m. was the deadline for members of the Senate Judiciary Committee to propose amendments to the Gang of Eight comprehensive immigration reform bill. There were a lot of amendments. Sen. Charles Grassley, ranking Republican on the committee, proposed 77. Fellow Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions, perhaps the leading opponent of the bill on the committee, proposed 49. Sen. Orrin Hatch proposed 24. Sen. Mike Lee proposed 23. Altogether, Republicans proposed 194 amendments, while Democrats proposed 106, for a total of 300. Reading all the amendments will take some time,
|
Amnesty Background Check Prevents Law Enforcement From Deporting Criminals
|
|
FrontPage Magazine, by Daniel Greenfield
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:11:32 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What good is a background check that doesn’t actually penalize criminals? Like the rest of Amnesty 2013, it exists only to aid the Democratic Party’s culture of criminality. Their concern is with a clause that would, during the background check process, prohibit immigration officials from forwarding criminal histories to law enforcement for deportation purposes. “The idea is we are supposed to be weeding out the bad apples,” said Steven Camarota, of the Center for Immigration Studies. “But the big problem with the bill is it does not require those denied the amnesty to leave the country.
|
|
Conversions to Islam
|
|
FrontPage Magazine, by David Solway
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:06:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
An alarming feature of our current sociocultural world is the striking frequency of conversions to Islam across the entire gamut of Western private and public life: prisoners converting to the religion of peace in record numbers; women who crave the emotional comfort and feeling of security that donning the hijab or the niqab purportedly confers; disaffected youth who find purpose and meaning in attending the mosque, often becoming radicalized in the process; African-Americans reacting against Christianity as the white man’s religion and who “associate conversion
|
Sen. Tom Carper Proposes Text Reminders to People Who Might Overstay Their Visas
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Melanie Hunter
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 10:44:37 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, proposed Tuesday using text messages to remind people who are inside the U.S. on visas when their visas are scheduled to run out. “You’ve got a month to go on your visa. You got two weeks to go. You got a week to go. You got a day to go, and the idea that people know that we know that they’re here, we know that their time is running out, and we’re watching them,” Carper said, describing ways the possible text
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Hillary Clinton — culpable for Benghazi from beginning to end
|
|
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/7/2013 5:14:14 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When it first became clear that the CIA’s Benghazi talking points had been altered, many of us viewed the White House as the prime suspect. After all, it served President Obama’s political purposes to claim, at the height of a political campaign in which he was taking credit for the fall of al Qaeda, that the death of a U.S. ambassador was down to spontaneous outrage over a video, rather than pre-planned terrorism. It turns out, however, that the State Department was the prime culprit. It was State that pushed back hard against the original talking points.
|
Republican probe of Benghazi attacks turns to Hillary Clinton
|
|
Washington Post, by Philip Rucker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/8/2013 6:52:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Republican lawmakers, who have spent months seeking to tie President Obama to last year’s deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, are increasingly focusing their probe on a new target: former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton. The GOP-led investigation of the Sept. 11, 2012, assaults that killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others now centers heavily on the State Department and whether officials there deliberately misled the public about the nature of the assault. Three State Department officials are scheduled to testify before a House committee on Wednesday about the Benghazi attack and its aftermath.
|
Turning on Obama
|
|
Amerian Spectator, by Ross Kaminsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/7/2013 6:19:30 AM
Post Reply
|
|
If ponies rode men and grass ate cows, And cats were chased into holes by the mouse … If summer were spring and the other way round, Then all the world would be upside down. Once in a long while, an event evokes one of my favorite historical images: the British Army band, at Lord Cornwallis’ surrender at Yorktown which sealed the Americans’ revolutionary victory, playing “The World Turned Upside Down.” In this case, the event is the dramatic change over the past two weeks
|
Seattle to melt buyback guns into peace bricks
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: maggie2u- 5/7/2013 1:13:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Seattle Police Department collected more than 700 guns during a buyback in January, and now city officials have a plan for what to do with them. Mayor Mike McGinn is expected to announce Tuesday that they´ll be melted into bricks carrying messages of peace, and the bricks will be placed around the city. The buyback program was announced a month after last December´s elementary school massacre in Newtown, Conn., by city leaders sick of hearing about gun violence. Private sponsors including Amazon.com contributed tens of thousands of dollars
|
Sanford gets second chance: On political scrapheap 4 years ago, ex-governor wins 1st district seat
|
|
Post & Courier [Charleston, SC], by Glenn Smith*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/8/2013 12:59:28 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Gov. Mark Sanford completed the trail to political redemption Tuesday with a win over Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch to reclaim his old seat in Congress. Sanford defeated Colbert Busch 54 percent to 45 percent, according to full unofficial results. Turnout was heavier than expected, with about 32 percent of the district’s 455,702 registered voters casting ballots. Sanford, who has never lost an election, returns to the 1st District seat he held for three terms from 1995-2001. It’s a remarkable comeback for a man many pundits had written off after his highly publicized affair with an Argentine
|
Dem Congressman At Benghazi Hearing: "Death Is A Part Of Life"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 2:27:15 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, tells Benghazi witnesses that "death is a part of life." CUMMINGS: And, as I listen to your testimony I could not help but think of something that I said very recently -- two years ago now -- in a eulogy for a relative. I said that death is a part of life, so often we have to find a way to make life a part of death. And, I guess the reason why I´m saying that, going back to something Mr. Nordstrom said, he wanted,
|
A new ‘Dawn’ at ABC: Newsman becomes newswoman
|
|
New York Post, by Tara Palmeri
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:26:11 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Top ABC News editor Don Ennis walked into his Manhattan office on Friday in a “little black dress” and a brunette bobbed wig and announced to colleagues that from now on, he would like to be known as Dawn. The 49-year-old father of three said he’s splitting from his wife of 17 years to become a woman, or Dawn Stacey Ennis, as she is now known on her governmental records. “Today I begin anew,” she wrote on her Facebook timeline, where she debuted a flirty new profile picture. “Please understand: This is not a game of
|
Benghazi: Incompetence, but no cover-up
|
|
National Journal, by Michael Hirsh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/8/2013 6:04:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There was tragic incompetence, plainly, in the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi attacks, and even possibly some political calculation. It is a record that may well come to haunt Hillary Clinton, the first Secretary of State to lose an ambassador in the field in more than three decades, if she runs for president in 2016. But the obvious Republican effort to turn this inquiry into the Democratic (Obama) version of the Iraq intelligence scandal that has tarred the GOP since the George W. Bush years -- led by that least-credible of champions, the almost-always-wrong Darrell Issa --
|
Fox Analyst Shreds ‘Cowardly, Duplicitous’ Admin Over Benghazi: ‘Sacrificed American Lives For Politics’
|
|
Mediaite, by Meenal Vamburkar
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:47:07 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Ahead of the Benghazi hearings in which three witnesses are set to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade invited Fox News analyst Lt. Col. Ralph Peters to discuss the issue. Peters was unflinching in his criticism of the “cowardly” Obama administration — and the “establishment media” that aids it. “Is this a national security coverup?” Kilmeade asking, explaining that the witness testimony is expected to say the administration was deceitful in its handling of the situation. “The administration, facing the election, went into panic mode, wanted to contain it,”
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee: Constitution implies a right to health care, education
|
|
Washington Times, by Douglas Ernst
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/7/2013 8:22:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee took to the House floor Monday night and implied that the right to health care and education exists in the Constitution. Ms. Jackson Lee, Texas Democrat, also made the case that the moral authority for such services is also derived from the Declaration of Independence. “One might argue that education and health care fall into those provisions of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” she said. Ms. Jackson Lee added, “I think that what should be continuously emphasized is the president’s leadership on one single point: that although health care was not
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|