A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


The Pain of 2 Pennies
Townhall, by Tim Phillips

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 2/24/2013 6:08:01 AM

Like a breathless 13 year old girl at a One Direction concert, President Obama raced around the nation over the last week attempting to frighten Americans into opposing the modest cuts to the federal budget due through the sequester process on March 1. Never mind that the sequester was President Obama´s idea. Never mind that these cuts amount to just 2 cents on every dollar of the federal budget. And, never mind that his Administration has made history, in a bad way, by running four straight trillion dollar plus deficits. No, there was the President standing in front

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Spidey, 2/24/2013 6:29:51 AM     (No. 9193107)

One of the problems that Obama´s alarmism machine is running into is people have little sympathy for a government worker losing his/her job.The private sector has probably lost around 8 million jobs since Obama got started and that´s going to get even worse when Obamacare kicks in.

So Obama decreases the tax base under Obamacare while touting all the nice giveaways the program offers. I mean a normal person would be encouraging job creation to pay for such a monstrous new program but ohh-no,not Obama.

It all comes down to Obama´s Marxist viewpoint that a healthy economy benefits the wrong people,in this case private sector republicans.
While Obama spend reckless billions to recycle the same money for unions to donate to dems,he´s stealing money from the private sector so they won´t have money to donate.

Even still,conservatives have tons of money to donate,the problem is a lack of candidates people believe in.How many reliable conservatives can you name off the top of your head?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Pearson365, 2/24/2013 6:47:43 AM     (No. 9193124)

As March 1st approaches, Obama will be speaking everyday about how "It´s the GOP´s fault if orphans, the handicap and pregnant women will die because of sequestion". And, how wild dogs will roam the streets, horses will be turned in ground chuck and why serial killers have to released. It is going to be a depressing period, a period that hopefully the Repubs can handle with calm, sober responses and strong knees. If the GOP caves over sequestration, Obama will have created his one party system well before 2014. Because any future GOP attempts for even modest fiscal sanity will be brushed aside by Obama and Dems. It will be spend, tax, regulate & waste 24/7 for the next 46 months.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: provide, 2/24/2013 7:09:50 AM     (No. 9193149)

I´m waiting for the PSAs a 5 year old pouring milk on cold cereal for the 3 year old sister with spilled milk running down the table. "Budget cuts have impacted child care for working mothers leaving children to survive alone."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Rinktum, 2/24/2013 7:11:29 AM     (No. 9193150)

Obama is in his glory doing his best Chicken Little impression. He is being aided, abetted and cheered on by his lapdog media. Notwithstanding their agreement with everything he says, they also love a possible crisis to foster. It is unsettling how much they enjoy misery. Most of all though, the President would rather vilify the Republicans than try and have a dialog with them. He is not interested in discussing any ideas other than his. He is vested in the destruction of the opposition. He is waging war. The Republicans are playing tiddlywinks.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: gonavy, 2/24/2013 7:14:48 AM     (No. 9193153)

I can understand why everyone is angry at how huge the government has gotten and the waste and abuse going on but I can´t understand a statement like "people have little sympathy for a government worker losing his/her job".

Do the people on LDOT truly not understand that no matter who signs your paycheck it´s still a job that a family is relying on? Do the people on LDOT think that the average worker created this mess by simply applying for a job. Are they parasites for wanting a paycheck?

I would think that empathy for anyone losing a job is a healthy emotion and that separating the smarmy politicians of both parties and union leadership who created the mess from the average joe government worker is appropriate.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: fritzilou, 2/24/2013 7:41:31 AM     (No. 9193175)

Yes there is sympathy for any worker losing their job, but do they have to get all the raises, step raises and increased perks during this time when so many are unemployed. The government is to big; it takes to much money that should be circulating more quickly into the economy by the private sector. The government must be made smaller through attrition and employees must have their salaries frozen until things get under control.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 2/24/2013 8:07:34 AM     (No. 9193213)

Here´s a sure-fire way to convince even the dimmest bulb when trying to prove that the government has no desire or plan to manage the hard earned money we send them. The beauty of this response in its brevity:

United State Post Office.
Then just move on to the next ´denier´.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: nonsense, 2/24/2013 8:27:55 AM     (No. 9193248)

Bari has hired 101 new Federal workers every day of his 4 +++ years and counting reign. While in those 4 years, millions of others are losing their jobs.

I have a friend who works for the National Givernment, they sent him a form letter telling him that every pay period in the future, his pay would be reduced by so much. Taking the fear to the workers and shoving it in their faces. The Big Lie drones on.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Alex, 2/24/2013 8:45:15 AM     (No. 9193275)

As of right now, federal workers are not loosing their jobs. They are being furloughed. This means they will have as many as 22 days and some as few as 8 days off a year from work without pay. The federal workers have had 2 years to plan for this and had each one saved the equivalent of one day´s pay a week they´d have more than money to tide them over or a nice nest egg in addition to their retirements if sequestration did not happen at all.

Isn´t it ironic, though, that local, state and the federal governments keep demanding that we take financial hits through the implementation of higher taxes and higher fees, but these same governments are unwilling to do with a penny less.

FTA: "As furloughs loom, unions try to soften sequester blow for federal workers" in the Washington Post (search LCOM for the link)

"No one will be sent home without pay Friday. The soonest furloughs would start is April 1. Employees must be given a notice at least 30 days in advance, and they have seven days to contest it. Most agencies plan to spread out unpaid days to minimize the effect on services and workers.

Furloughs will mean forfeited vacation and sick time, but how much time depends on the number of forced days off. It is unclear whether hardship cases will be considered. As Bastani told Labor Department employees, federal workers should be careful about three-day holiday weekends. Adding a fourth as a furlough day means they will not get holiday pay. Short-term unemployment benefits are an option, he said, but not in Virginia. Contractors working on ongoing projects will not be furloughed."


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: LZK, 2/24/2013 9:05:23 AM     (No. 9193308)

Ah -- the ideaa of 2 cents -- brings back fond memories of River/View in Chicago. Once a month -- or so -- the neighborhood amusement park would have a 2 cents day. Most of the rides cost 2 cents that day....

It was the time when my mother -- raising four small girls -- could afford to take US.

What great memories!! Never had "anger" at the kids who could afford to pay 15 cents on any other day. I simply enjoyed MY day....

There´s a lesson in there somewhere....

LZK

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: BorninOKC, 2/24/2013 9:14:21 AM     (No. 9193322)

The last paragraph of the article includes one part of the problem - that some Republican Congresspeople are nervous over the size of any "cut" that would happen.

Why that crowd expects donations for their reelecton campaigns or voters to turn out is beyond me.







  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Zumkopf, 2/24/2013 11:07:20 AM     (No. 9193512)

Don´t worry too much about the furloughs. It is more certain than gravity that any Federal worker´s docked pay will be reimbursed when the budget "crisis" is over.

It is equally certain that the only force which will effectively reduce the size of the Federal government is a bona fide fiscal collapse. And even then, given the rise of the "lo-fos", fascism is as likely as effective reform. I hate to say it, but it is true.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 2/24/2013 11:41:12 AM     (No. 9193570)

No.5, there are many too many people on the government payroil. Part of Obama´s plan to solve unempoyhment is to create agencies and departments and expand others. Our government was already too large when he was first elected and now is eating us up. Sympathy is well and good but we cannot have smaller government so long as we shrink from firing people. When we hear of someone losing their job we can´t help but think it´s a step in the right direction.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: GreatPlains, 2/24/2013 12:20:39 PM     (No. 9193625)

# 4 The Chicken Little comparison is apt.
Although, considering the Whole Foods flap over plain chicken and Obama ,
live poultry imagery will probably be deemed racist, too.
Anyway-the POTUS used to be a calming figure
for the nation , from Washington to Lincoln to FDR to George W Bush on 9/11.
This guy is always running around wringing his hands and clinging to Reggie over everything
from the flu to the budget.
While his wife does the Chicken Dance on tv.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Hobbiest, 2/24/2013 1:12:37 PM     (No. 9193684)

#5. I save my sympathy for those who actually have worked for a living. Featherbedders can go to blazes and the federal government has a huge percentage of featherbedders. Fact. Each year about three percent of the workers in the for profit sector are fired for performance related issues. Fact. In the federal government less than 1% get fired and they are almost all lowly blue collar workers. Indeed, it is far more likely a white collar federal worker dies from natural causes than gets fired for incompetence. Instead of firing toxic employees the feds tend to give them a fancier title and a no work job, then hire another person to do the work they were supposed to do. This, in turn, tends to reduce the incentive of everyone else in the agency to turn in an honest day´s work.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: flatwater, 2/24/2013 2:47:45 PM     (No. 9193804)

Just watching Wise King Barky shriek and howl and stamp his feet and tear his litte dress....

It would be hilarious if it weren´t so pathetic.

Poor, poor, set-upon Barky.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: 4Justice, 2/24/2013 2:48:27 PM     (No. 9193808)

Call me hard-hearted Hanna...I don´t have a lot of sympathy for Federal workers possibly losing their jobs. Not at all. Yes, the government is ten times too big, too powerful and too intrusive. Most people who have chosen to work for the government have been given a privilege none of us in the private sector have...nearly lifetime security (no matter how incompetent or lazy they are), better pay and benefits (paid from my paycheck), and most of the jobs are not even truly necessary. But what bothers me most is that to get a job in government is often about who you know and/or how to play the system. No, let them deal with the real world as the rest of us have. If they don´t feel the pain of the economy, they won´t care what happens to the rest of us. They will just vote for bigger government anyway. I don´t want to pay their salaries if they are working against my best interests.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Pinons, 2/24/2013 2:49:58 PM     (No. 9193809)

Zero would not have to worry about those two cents if he and Sasquatch cut out their lavish, unnecessary vacations and the government departments reviewed their bloated so called budgets and cut out waste.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: sadc, 2/24/2013 2:53:10 PM     (No. 9193811)

So take it all, everything the rich have, every dime. Take it from all the movie stars, sports stars, every business big and small. Take everything and give it to the govt. That buys one year and that is all. Then what? You can only do this once because now the wealth, the rich, the golden geese of businesses are gone. We will all be equal. Equally poor except for the uber elite and that is just exactly how every communist, Marxist country has been. Is this what we want?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: dman, 2/24/2013 3:19:38 PM     (No. 9193843)

Indeed, Mr. Phillips, this is a moment of truth for the House Pubs. Do they have a spine or not? Instead of their leadership joining in the Chicken Little chorus, they should be selling the sequestration as an important baby step in restoring the economy. Own it. Stand up straight and the public might even listen. Sequestration at this point is a good thing, not a bad thing. Let it happen and then hit the Emperor hard on how he chooses to deal with it. The continuing resolution runs out next month. That´s the real test. But if you´re weak-kneed in this small thing, how can you be strong when it counts?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Really?, 2/24/2013 3:20:35 PM     (No. 9193844)

Just wait, he´ll end up bragging about how HE cut spending.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Chat-JD, 2/24/2013 5:14:24 PM     (No. 9193911)

I can understand the frustration against government workers but the issue is that this could affect national security as well. What a lot are not understanding is that this is going to affect all government agencies, groups, even those maintaining the equipment necessary to find and stop the terrorists crossing the borders (such as the camera systems on the border, the radio infrastructure that the Border Patrol or other groups use to communicate, etc.). Some of these groups have already seen their paycheck cut a significant amount due to recent government decisions (removal of hazard pay for workers that had it for years through a reversal policy). Some groups haven´t had any new hiring for 2+ years but are down below 50% staffing levels due to attrition (death, retirement, firing) and now furlough hits and the mission to repair and maintain these systems will be delayed--which could allow terrorists over the border.
It is one thing to cut the projects, wasteful spending, but this untargeted cut of working days for critical infrastructure groups could be ultimately devastating for our nation´s security.
In all reality, even though I took a 10k paycut a year to move from private sector to government (for the exact same job between the two), I would be willing even to be furloughed extra days (and yes, it would be a major financial hardship), if it would keep these infrastructure technicians working and protect our national security.
Really, the Republicans need to up their game and start calling out all these departments who have decided to mess with the livelihood of the employed, instead of cutting the waste and corruption. These department heads (and Obama´s administration) should be charged with treason from my perspective, the moment the first critical infrastructure technician is furloughed.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog, 2/24/2013 6:59:55 PM     (No. 9194044)

#5, working for the government is a conscious choice. Far too many choose that path because the work is undemanding, the pay well above market rate, job security is never a worry despite incompetence and malfeasance, and workers seeking a disproportionately lavish retirement package. Worst of all, they become a voting bloc detached from the realities of life and pledge their eternal support to statists who will serve their interests above those of the private sector and/or the nation.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Marcus Tullius, 2/24/2013 7:34:36 PM     (No. 9194083)

#5 I´m mil but work with many, many, many federal government civilian employees. 95% of them are worthless bureaucrats interested in nothing but their next paycheck and their next raise. We have way too many paper clip and staple inspectors. We have a bloated bureaucracy I have spent a lifetime fighting against. If we lost 90% of federal civil "servants" that would be a good start. And wouldn´t make life better for the rest of us immediately, and for them, too, in the long run?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Marcus Tullius, 2/24/2013 7:36:49 PM     (No. 9194084)

My previous post should end with, "And wouldn´t IT make life..."

Fat fingered typo...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: larryp, 2/25/2013 12:43:10 AM     (No. 9194321)

This man my parent knew went to wonk for the staste government. He wasthere for afew weeks and got all the work done assignedto him for the week within a couple of days. the co-workers met with him and explained he is rockng the boat. "Jim", they said, "you´ll just have to get used to working 46% of the time..."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: country boy, 2/26/2013 8:06:26 AM     (No. 9196614)

No idea.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 724700




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Rand Paul for President
Wall Street Journal, by Bret Stephens    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 9:25:40 AM     Post Reply
Republicans, let´s get it over with. Fast forward to the finish line. Avoid the long and winding primary road. It can only weaken the nominee. And we know who he—yes, he—has to be. Not Jeb Bush, who plainly is unsuited to be president. He is insufficiently hostile to Mexicans. He holds heretical views on the Common Core, which, as we well know, is the defining issue of our time. And he´s a Bush. Another installment of a political dynasty just isn´t going to fly with the American people, who want some fresh blood in their politics. Unless the dynasty is

Progressive Puritans
Reason Magazine, by Matt Welch    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:42:20 AM     Post Reply
When I first started hearing people on the political left describe themselves with some frequency as progressive back in the 1990s, the term did not seem tethered to the epoch-defining, early-20th-century spasm of moral crusading and government centralization that helped give us everything from trust busting to Prohibition to the Federal Reserve. As articulated by champions like Ralph Nader and Molly Ivins, the progressive label was both a way to get out from under the generation-old baggage of liberal-a term Ronald Reagan and others had turned into an epithet-and to differentiate lefties from seemingly apologetic triangulators like Bill Clinton and

Eleven Days to November
Politico Magazine, by Larry Sabato    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:39:40 AM     Post Reply
For political junkies desperate for clues to the hottest House, Senate and governors’ races around the country, April is the cruelest month. While Illinois and Texas primaries were held last month, the 48 remaining state contests don’t start up again for three weeks. Here’s the good news for those of us hoping to determine whether Democrats or Republicans will be celebrating in the fall: From early May to early September, we’ll have a steady stream of conventions, primaries and runoffs to keep us busy. We’ve already learned a little from the first two contests. On March 4, Texas told us two contradictory

Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Brandeis University Faculty Sent
Letter Demanding School Rescind
Ayaan Hirsi Ali Honorary Degree
Washington Free Beacon, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:18:07 AM     Post Reply
Over 80 members of the Brandeis University faculty sent a letter to the school’s president earlier this month, demanding the school withdraw its honorary degree invitation to women’s rights activist and critic of Islam Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Brandeis rescinded the invitation to Hirsi Ali last week, prompting a public backlash from Hirsi Ali’s supporters. In the April 6 letter, faculty members called on Brandeis President Fred Lawrence to drop Hirsi Ali from the ceremony because of comments she has made about her opposition to Islam. “We are writing to urge you to rescind immediately the invitation to Ms. Ayaan Hirsi

The World Cup Just Got Bidenified:
Here´s What We Can Expect
Atlantic Wire, by Sara Morrison    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:13:13 AM     Post Reply
He may not have been able to attend the Sochi Olympics, but Vice President Joe Biden is set to return to the world sporting event stage this summer by hanging out at the World Cup, the White House announced today. Biden is very excited. "You know, we have our Super Bowl, we have our World Series, we have the NBA Finals, we have March Madness, but my Lord, it is nothing quite like the World Cup," he said today as he and Secretary of State John Kerry unveiled the World Cup trophy. Kerry, meanwhile, stuck with boring comments like "I can´t think

Obama´s Numbers Worse News For Democrats
American Spectator, by J.T. Young    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:10:50 AM     Post Reply
Bad as Obama’s poll numbers are, they bode worse for Congressional Democrats. Obama is being buoyed by continued strong support from Democrat voters. The problem for Congressional Democrats is that November’s election outcome will not be determined in Democrat strongholds. Recent Quinnipiac polling data (released April 2, of 1,578 registered voters nationwide, with a MOE of +/-2.5%) showed the president with a deeply negative rating on his handling of the economy: 40% approval and 55% disapproval. In his sixth year in office, and the fifth year after the recession, 74% of respondents still rated the economy as “not so good” to

HHS nominee got $1.2M at
‘zero’ salary job at Wal-Mart
Washington Times, by Jim McElhatton    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:05:34 AM     Post Reply
During her brief but lucrative stint as president of Wal-Mart’s charitable foundation in 2012, Sylvia Matthews Burwell received at least $750,000 in bonuses from an organization that doles out hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions but keeps a tight lid on its own compensation practices, records show. Ms. Burwell spent a little more than a year running Wal-Mart’s foundation before President Obama tapped her to be his budget chief last year — and then last week asked her to take over as health and human services secretary. Her White House biography touts her key private-sector experience as president of the massive

Can You Lie in Politics?
Supreme Court Will Decide
Roll Call, by David Hawkings    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 4:45:45 AM     Post Reply
The Supreme Court has made pretty clear that putting your money where your mouth is deserves broad protection as a form of free political speech. The justices are about to consider whether outright lying in a campaign deserves a similar First Amendment shield. The court’s recent decisions easing the flow of generous campaign contributions already shifted the electoral landscape. If the court finds that even the most patently outrageous statements about candidates may not be barred by law, those two decisions combined could expand the rhetorical battlefield of the midterm elections and raise the attack ad volume as never before. With Congress

The Real Meaning of Soviet
Agitprop in Jay Carney’s Kitchen
PJ Media, by Oleg Atbashian    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 4:42:19 AM     Post Reply
As soon as the photograph of Soviet propaganda posters in Jay Carney’s kitchen hit the Internet, right-wing pundits began to draw conclusions about White House Press Secretary’s ideology, morals, and political leanings. It was as if things that a man merely places on his walls and looks at day after day can be any indication of his life choices. If that were so, the meals in Carney’s kitchen would also probably match the menu of the place and time of the posters. His family would be living on a diet of beets, gruel, occasional rat, and thinly sliced boiled jackboots, which

Former Sheriff Treviño:
´I plead guilty, your honor´
McAllen Monitor [TX], by Ildefonso Ortiz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 4:39:30 AM     Post Reply
McALLEN — Five words sealed the fate of the man who used to be the highest law enforcement official in Hidalgo County. “I plead guilty, your honor,” former Sheriff Lupe Treviño said Monday morning when asked for his plea on the charge of money laundering. Wearing a black suit with a white shirt and red tie, Treviño spoke loudly and clearly when responding to the questions made by U.S. District Court Judge Micaela Alvarez. Read the money laundering charges against Lupe Treviño With a hand in his pocket and a slight tilt to his head, Treviño agreed to the facts

The Saga of Bundy Ranch --Federal Power, Rule
of Law and Averting Potential Bloodshed
Breitbart Big Government, by Logan Churchwell & Brandon Darby    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/14/2014 9:32:52 AM     Post Reply
BUNKERVILLE, NEVADA—The Bundy Ranch roundup has understandably stirred thin-stretched emotions as the federal government seizes cattle belonging to the Bundy family. The family settled in the late 1800’s and has ranched in the area since. The federal government allowed Nevada ranchers to graze their cattle on federal tracts of land adjacent to their private properties for generations. The federal government later created the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to administer and “protect” the vast swaths of federal land—including the land the Bundy family’s livelihood was—and still is—dependent upon. The BLM began restricting ranchers’ usage of federal lands to protect various



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

40 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Brit Hume: Obama, Holder
‘Benefited Enormously’ From
Being African American

39 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Evan McMurry    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/13/2014 9:14:46 PM     Post Reply
On Fox News Sunday, political analyst Brit Hume said that Eric Holder’s claim that his treatment at the hands of Representative Louie Gohmert (R-TX) at a House hearing this week was unprecedented toward an Attorney General, made him a “crybaby,” and that he and President Barack Obama had in fact benefited “enormously” from being the first African Americans in their respective positions. “This strikes me as kinda crybaby stuff from Holder,” Hume said. “My sense about this is both Eric Holder and Barack Obama have benefited politically enormously from the fact that they are African American and the first to

Why The Feds Chickened Out
On A Nevada Ranch

36 replie(s)
Townhall, by Kevin McCullough    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/13/2014 11:55:18 AM     Post Reply
Let me obliterate a bit of confusion here: the Obama administration attempted to go to war with a rancher in Nevada. Let me amplify a little bit of truth: They tucked tail and have returned home. And let me add a bit of clarity: they had no choice! As the nation began to become familiar with the plight of the family of Cliven Bundy, many of us harkened back to another standoff in which the Federal government attempted to bully it´s outcome: Waco, Texas and the Branch Davidian massacre. It is telling that in the Nevada case the feds pulled out so

Why Hillary v. Jeb Would
Be Great for America

35 replie(s)
Daily Beast, by Mark McKinnon    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/13/2014 6:11:32 PM     Post Reply
They’re both qualified, respectful of each other (shocker!), and represent the vast majority of middle America. So what’s not to like about another Clinton/Bush race for 2016? When you mention the prospect of Clinton vs. Bush 2016 a funny thing happens. First, there is the reflexive response: "Oh no, not again. We don´t need more dynastic politics in this country." But upon further reflection, you realize Jeb Bush vs. Hillary Clinton would be a great race and actually good for the country. Let´s review. QUALIFICATIONS—THEY’VE BOTH GOT THEM. Barack Obama won the presidency because in an election where the premium was on change, it mattered little

The world must shift to solar and wind
power rapidly to avoid catastrophic global
warming, say UN scientists in major report

35 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Ben Spencer    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/13/2014 7:15:31 PM     Post Reply
A rapid shift to wind and solar power is needed if the world is to avoid catastrophic global warming, the United Nations warns in a crucial report today. Emissions of greenhouse gases need to be cut by up to 70 per cent before 2050 to control climate change, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says. ‘Large-scale changes in energy systems’ are required, with coal power stations to be switched off and replaced by wind and solar. And the transformation needs to be made in the next 15 years or controlling climate change will become increasingly harder and more expensive. The report was published

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

33 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

Nevada GOP removes social issues from platform,
moves ahead with pre-primary endorsements

29 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Sandra Chereb    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/13/2014 3:48:58 PM     Post Reply
LAS VEGAS — The Nevada Republican Party stripped opposition to abortion and gay marriage from its platform Saturday as state convention delegates instead focused on judging fellow Republicans on their worthiness to serve in office and adherence to GOP values. The platform, with few changes, was adopted overwhelmingly as the Las Vegas convention stretched late into the evening. The vote mirrors that of the Clark County GOP, which voted earlier to remove platform language defining marriage as between a man and a woman and statements opposing abortion. Many Republicans are re-evaluating their strong stances on conservative social issues as public

Obama Selects First Openly Gay
Episcopal Bishop to Lead Easter Prayer

27 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Andrew Kirell    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 12:46:05 PM     Post Reply
President Obama pulled a surprise move Monday at the White House’s Easter Prayer Breakfast when he selected Gene Robinson to lead the closing prayer. Robinson is famously known as the first openly gay Episcopal bishop. Talking Points Memo’s Tom Kludt spotted the following tweet from Robinson, who was in attendance: (Tweet) Robinson, 66, became diocesan bishop of New Hampshire in March 2004. He retired in January 2013 and is currently a senior fellow at the progressive

Developing: Russian fighter jet buzzes
U.S. Navy destroyer in Black Sea

27 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Lolita C. Baldor    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 12:49:12 PM     Post Reply
A Russian fighter jet made multiple, close-range passes near an American warship in the Black Sea for more than 90 minutes Saturday amid escalating tensions in the region, a U.S. military official said Monday. In the first public account of the incident, the official said the Russian Fencer flew within 1,000 yards of the USS Donald Cook, a Navy destroyer, at about 500 feet above sea level. Ship commanders considered the actions provocative and inconsistent with international agreements, prompting the ship to issue several radio queries and warnings. The fighter appeared to be unarmed and never was in danger of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

27 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

You´re in denial if
you think Steve Israel is
wrong about GOP racism

26 replie(s)
Daily Beast, by Michael Tomasky    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/14/2014 6:09:58 AM     Post Reply
Some time back, whenever a big racial controversy erupted, I trained myself into the habit of reading about it at FoxNews.com, just for the unbelievable comment threads. Let’s put it this way: If my friends and I went out to a bar and started playing a “let’s write the racist FoxNews.com comment thread” drinking game, our efforts couldn’t begin to approach what I read there.I wasn’t alone. Liberal websites started feasting on these threads. And so, a couple of years ago, Ailes & Co. got wise. Stories about race were, at least in my disheartened experience, closed to comments.


Post Reply   Close thread 724700





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS