A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Bye, bye, Facebook: Americans
abandoning in droves, says poll

Washington Examiner [DC], by Paul Bedard

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 2/17/2013 5:49:23 AM

The Facebook craze that gave us Farmville and notes from "friends" about their breakfast and just about everything else may finally be ending. A new Pew Research Center poll finds that a huge group of users, 61 percent, are taking breaks from Facebook up to "several weeks" long, and that virtually all age groups are decreasing their time on the social media site that recently flopped in its initial public offering of publicly traded stock. Most devastating: 38 percent of users aged 18-29, the focus of advertisers on the site, plan to slash their time on Facebook this year.

  

Post Reply   Next (100) Replies   End of Thread  

Reply 1 - Posted by: SpencersMom, 2/17/2013 6:10:15 AM     (No. 9181032)

I have never understood the point of Facebook. It seems the biggest waste of time and has no purpose. I had a page for awhile but deleted it because I got tired of total strangers wanting to ´friend´ me.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Spidey, 2/17/2013 6:14:15 AM     (No. 9181036)

How is Obama going to be able to finish dossiers on people if the leave Facebook.Who knows how many Homeland security people scan the site every day looking for signs of right wing militias?

Maybe there will be an even bigger walk out because they´re tax cheats.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: planetgeo, 2/17/2013 6:18:02 AM     (No. 9181037)

Biggest waste of time ever. Desperate, obsessive outlet for the trivial minutiae of insecure people.


Reply 4 - Posted by: uno, 2/17/2013 6:18:05 AM     (No. 9181038)

It is now un-cool.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Sfacheem, 2/17/2013 6:28:50 AM     (No. 9181044)

Facebook is a good idea that they just couldn´t leave alone. It has become invasive and geared toward gossipy morons who do nothing all day without "updating their status". I don´t use it anymore because I can´t stand having to scroll through "eating a bagel!" to get to anything real that´s going on with friends. Last time I signed in there were cell phone camera photos of someone´s meals. Breakfast lunch and dinner. Can your life be more empty than that?


Reply 6 - Posted by: MisterDickens, 2/17/2013 6:37:11 AM     (No. 9181052)

Not sure they are tax "cheats", #2, at least based on the article I read. But not to quibble. What, exactly, would the federal government have done with the money if they had gotten their hands on it?

Would they have paid down the debt? No.
Would thay have reduced the deficit? No.
Would they have bought more votes by handing off the money to their buds? Yes.

I´d just as soon Facebook keep it even though I think Zuckerberg is a lucky twit.


Reply 7 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 2/17/2013 6:46:18 AM     (No. 9181057)

I would guess 90%+ of the scroll is women, half of them posting stuff like Share This if You Love Your Mother. I only post rare or significant stuff, like when I wash my car. Both rare and significant, that one.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: rabbit, 2/17/2013 6:49:45 AM     (No. 9181061)

Some people just haven´t learned how to use Facebook effectively and efficiently. You can hide ´friends´ who tell you about eating a bagel; you can hide games.

Local emergency groups get info on tornadoes and other need-to-know situations on Facebook faster than it gets to your local TV. And if the power is out, you can´t get that news from your local TV, but you can get it instantly on your smartphone via Facebook. Need current weather radar? Check Facebook. Need to check in with a relative who lives near a reported explosion? Check Facebook. Want to re-connect with someone you have lost contact with? Facebook. Funeral plans for your former neighbor? Facebook.


Reply 9 - Posted by: StormCnter, 2/17/2013 7:01:08 AM     (No. 9181073)

At the urging of friends, I reluctantly signed up a couple of years ago and have rarely returned. I think I am simply too uncool to enjoy all that socializing.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Keekng, 2/17/2013 7:07:56 AM     (No. 9181083)

Oh darn, this means, if I were using facebook and if I logged in to read it, I would never learn how many times a day some do a dump because they are leaving......


Reply 11 - Posted by: FreeBird, 2/17/2013 7:13:22 AM     (No. 9181087)

#8 is correct. I have my Facebook set up so that I rarely see posts from most of my "friends." But I see everything posted by my geographically scattered family members - including those all important photos of the rapidly growing children.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Fiesta del sol, 2/17/2013 7:20:30 AM     (No. 9181097)

I quit Facebook because it was depressing to see the pictures of my nieces and nephews with their red Solo cups partying and scantily clad. My brother and his wife are hipsters with no kids, and the non stop pictures of the artisanal beer they were drinking plus my Sister in law´s posts "going to pasta class", "getting a massage today...my week has been SOOO stressful" made me dislike them, and I don´t want to dislike them.

Facebook was helpful during a natural disaster my parents were in last year, I was able to get some info, but I actually found Twitter to be even more useful than Facebook.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: M2, 2/17/2013 7:21:53 AM     (No. 9181098)

Isn´t this the company that Obama just gave a billion or so dollar tax break to? He does have a habit of backing losing endeavors, but that´s not the point. The point is that Facebook´s CEO is a huge Obama supporter and Obama is telling the business-owners of America that if you support him, you get free stuff -- the same thing he did with voters.

As for Facebook´s value in our culture, I can find nothing good. It´s a haven for self-absorbed egocentrics who believe that what they have to say is of value.

If Facebook vanished tomorrow, along with Twitter, MyButt.com and the rest, few but narcissists would suffer.


Reply 14 - Posted by: mws50, 2/17/2013 7:30:03 AM     (No. 9181116)

Facebook utilized the tax breaks that Congress allowed them to use. It is the law. Congress allows special tax loopholes for the wealthy, while whining about the wealthy not paying their fair share.

That said... if we had a 10% flat tax, facebook would have paid $100,000,000 in taxes this past year (10% of their 1 billion dollar profit).


Reply 15 - Posted by: pickle1, 2/17/2013 7:30:50 AM     (No. 9181117)

Good.


Reply 16 - Posted by: rustycfc, 2/17/2013 7:31:01 AM     (No. 9181118)

do not no what facebook is and do not care.
much ado about nothing.


Reply 17 - Posted by: FenwayFrank, 2/17/2013 7:39:48 AM     (No. 9181136)

I have no need for Facebook. I prefer face-to-face contact with people I know and people I meet. I´m not about to have a relationship through a monitor, or with one for that matter.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 2/17/2013 7:45:01 AM     (No. 9181139)

#1, you are never going to be able to delete yourself from Facebook. Once you sign up, you are theirs forever. And I notice that they don´t touch on all the marriages that have been destroyed over the years since Facebook started up.

Facebook is the crockpot of the devil and I personnally will not sign up for it.


Reply 19 - Posted by: pineledger, 2/17/2013 7:46:42 AM     (No. 9181144)

Facebook and Twitter are two things Pineledger does not do. Policy.


Reply 20 - Posted by: darthmuaddib, 2/17/2013 7:48:56 AM     (No. 9181146)

It has caused much more harm than good in my experience. Hurtful comments between family members and friends leaving a terrible wake of destruction. It is hard to convey through a posting if it is meant as sarcasm or not.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Vivi, 2/17/2013 7:48:59 AM     (No. 9181147)

I signed up twice and deleted my account before using both times. My family members love it though. The position I held last year was eliminated and I do believe that not being on facebook hurt my job search. During the third interview with the company I ended up working for, my soon to be boss came out and asked me why I´m not on FB. Since then I´ve spent some time nurturing my linkedin profile. Hopefully this article means I can continue to skip FB.

Pretty sure I was kicked off twitter during the campaign because I kept asking MSM twitterers why they weren´t covering Benghazi. Hey, they asked on the air for people to send them tweets so I did. I had quite a few followers too. LOL. Dont really miss it though.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Whimsy, 2/17/2013 7:58:14 AM     (No. 9181167)

Us ´oldsters´ are going to abandon, which is about right after eight/nine years of existence. Of course, Twitter will be the same way in five years. Thanks to the information age, the phrase ´built in obsolecense´ has a new generation of people to ´inform´.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: bpl40, 2/17/2013 8:01:33 AM     (No. 9181173)

Deleting a Facebook account is like clicking on ´delete´ on your computer. You think the file is gone but it is still there.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Muguy, 2/17/2013 8:02:03 AM     (No. 9181175)

For persons wrapped up in themselves, this is tremendous self promotion, but with employers now checking facebook posts are part of background checks, it is something that should be used sparingly.

If it was a subscription-only service and there was a fee based on time used on the Facebook, few could afford it, and that person´s time spent on it would fall dramatically, thereby causing more productive time at work.

This is such a time waster... as is a lot of the crap on television with self=promoting people of low character and morality...


Reply 25 - Posted by: avidyananda, 2/17/2013 8:02:11 AM     (No. 9181176)

Facebook is a kind of window on the world for me. I grew up in the 1950s and 1960s and am aware of a world that existed that young people now cannot imagine. So I am sometimes disheartened when I see the postings that praise and advocate this issue or the other, but just seeing how so many people, many who are much younger than I, think and interact is instructive to me. I´ve found a couple of old friends and am able to keep up with people through facebook, but a lot of the postings is superficial and annoying. But even assessing the superficial and annoying is instructive. It helps to understand the world around us.


Reply 26 - Posted by: TakeBackAmerica, 2/17/2013 8:05:18 AM     (No. 9181181)

Good. Never been there, will not go.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 2/17/2013 8:14:11 AM     (No. 9181193)

I had no need for FB except that my adult kids post their kids´ photos there. I enjoy reading posts between my daughters - they both have quirky senses of humor, if sometimes a little too ribald for me, their mom - but I never post anything.

I opened two accounts over the years - one for my family and I tried to do that one - yawn. Plus, other family members ´friended´ me, or I them, or something. Anyway, their political posts (all extremely liberal libs) made me almost not want them as relatives any more. From brothers, to distant cousins. I lost a great deal of respect for most of them because of their juvenile, pro-Kerry, then pro-Obama/pro-New Establishment stuff. And of course, they always blamed GWB for everything.

Then I started a second account this past election year. (I´m just as political as my family, just the grown-up way.) But I kept getting ´friend requests´ from those on my original account. I hate the cross-over stuff. I don´t care about what childhood friends of my ex-husband´s second cousin is doing these days. I should close this last one, because sooner or later, the Obamatrons are going to turn me in. I can see it now - I´ll be arrested for dissing the Emperor, thrown into prison, and spend my final years waiting for the needle.

But! I´ll get 3 hots and a cot and medical care until then, eh?!


Reply 28 - Posted by: qotw, 2/17/2013 8:14:58 AM     (No. 9181196)

Good grief everyone, get a grip. If you´ve never been on FB then ignore it. If you are on FB, then block the posts or "friends" who are annoying. It is that simple. I have reconnected with old childhood and college friends which has been a lot of fun. It is a great way to keep up with nieces and nephews and other family members that I don´t get to see often. But the best part is seeing pics of my kids and grand kids. That is all I use it for and I for one know how to use it and enjoy it.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Susannah, 2/17/2013 8:21:45 AM     (No. 9181206)

Sarah Palin will have to find a new way of communicating with the public.


Reply 30 - Posted by: krause, 2/17/2013 8:26:13 AM     (No. 9181211)

People put way to much personal information online, including photos of their kids, including where they live, where and when they go places. Dangerous.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Slake, 2/17/2013 8:36:35 AM     (No. 9181223)

Thirty posts on a forum most critical about Facebook
Hmmmmm


Reply 32 - Posted by: dolphin, 2/17/2013 8:37:38 AM     (No. 9181226)

I have my Facebook page set up so I see the posts of my family and my close friends. It is the only way I can stay in touch with the younger members of my family, so I am there.

Through Facebook I have learned a lot more about some of the people I work with and associate with than I would like to know. But now I know that I really don´t need to get close to any of them.

The thing to do to keep the peace is learn how to give people a "restricted" status so they can´t see what you post. Once you have done this, stop them from being in your newsfeed and do not put them in any group. Then, if you need to contact them or want to find out what they are up to, you still can.


Reply 33 - Posted by: mitzi, 2/17/2013 8:43:25 AM     (No. 9181238)

It may be that FB is moving in a direction that doesn´t interest those who are leaving.

I like FB. I belong to a couple of special interest groups with members all around the world. Comparing activities, notes, research, etc. is so convenient. One group is a DNA group ... we all share common ancestors thousands of years ago. Another group is focused on our hobby.

I don´t mind the advertising for products I "like." I´ve even won some drawings. It´s easy enough to block unwanted advertisers.

Our apartment managment company even uses FB to update residents. Local restaurants announce specials.

It´s great to keep in touch with family and friends around the country and share pictures - but that´s just a tiny part of FB.


Reply 34 - Posted by: R. Edgar, 2/17/2013 8:43:48 AM     (No. 9181239)

Never had a page, never used it, and avoided it for the very reasons that are now getting attention. [Keep in mind that electrons follow the laws of science, not morality.]

If you live your life on social sites, you may as well walk around naked.


Reply 35 - Posted by: woodsman, 2/17/2013 8:44:56 AM     (No. 9181241)

In other news....world productivity inexplicably increased sharply...economists are trying to determine why


Reply 36 - Posted by: susieq1, 2/17/2013 8:48:15 AM     (No. 9181250)

It can be dangerous posting photos due to the technology availabe today anyone can click on the photos and get the exact location of where it was taken; therefore your home. Don´t need fb and don´t have an account for those who want and like it that is their cup of tea.


Reply 37 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 2/17/2013 9:02:48 AM     (No. 9181265)

I have never been a facebooker and never will be. I want to spend what free time I have posting here on L.com learning from our fellow posters and the great news digs they find.

On the social networking thing, I prefer to reach out to friends and family the old fashioned way, with my eyes, ears, and mouth, on the phone or in person.

After I saw that post last week here on L.com by the Canadian Free Press, prefer my privacy from Obie´s evil eye.


Reply 38 - Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth, 2/17/2013 9:03:06 AM     (No. 9181266)

Very grown up of you, #29.

Just an itch you can´t quite scratch, apparently.


Reply 39 - Posted by: jalo1951, 2/17/2013 9:09:16 AM     (No. 9181275)

To each his own but not my cup of tea. FB reminds of those "family Christmas letters" we sometimes get. Ugh.


Reply 40 - Posted by: Periwinkel, 2/17/2013 9:12:24 AM     (No. 9181278)

As my grandmother used to tell me, "Fools´ names and fools´ faces always appear in public places."

I think she had a point.


Reply 41 - Posted by: Holeymoses, 2/17/2013 9:20:22 AM     (No. 9181294)

Phfew!....now on to Twitter.


Reply 42 - Posted by: Mobyclik, 2/17/2013 9:22:45 AM     (No. 9181296)

My brother-in-law has an account with FB. Talk about complete nonsense and self-bloviating, that is the place for it. Most of the stuff on FB is as important as all those stupid cell-phone conversations we have to live with in every public place we go. Sometimes technology is a bite in the butt.

I don´t have a FB account and don´t have a cellphone and I´m alive and well. Must be a miracle.


Reply 43 - Posted by: lasvegaslou, 2/17/2013 9:29:43 AM     (No. 9181308)

You facebookers should get out of the house and have a little fun. You could join me in Las Vegas for a few days - or more if you can keep up. For a limited time I am offering free tutoring in gambling, boozing, chasing women and general debauchery. This short, three day course has received rave reviews from the Hollywood set. Paris Hilton and Charlie Sheen both gave it rave reviews.


Reply 44 - Posted by: CEP, 2/17/2013 9:30:14 AM     (No. 9181310)

#8 is correct. It can be fun just last night my whole family was connected since my nephew was in a State wrestling tounament and he was in the championship game, being that many of us were scattered across the country, the family that could go cheer him on they kept the rest of us informed . Our nephew knew the whole family was with him. Well he is now State Champ and we of course were celebrating, not in person but thru facebook. It isn´t just about inane things but families apart can connect real time.


Reply 45 - Posted by: J F Ackerman, 2/17/2013 9:31:41 AM     (No. 9181312)

Wow, a piece of good news to begin the day.
Me, me, me, me, me, me......


Reply 46 - Posted by: kate3513, 2/17/2013 9:36:02 AM     (No. 9181321)

I use it to quote scripture, to ask for prayer warriors for my family and friends who are battling cancer or serious illness and for the families of those whose loved ones have died. I use it to see photos of my children and grandchildren which makes me an immediate participant in their daily lives as we live far from them. It is like anything else...you can use it for good or you can use it as a tool for evil. Not unlike the Bible...it is good and meant for good but now is under attack. You had to know that sooner or later the interest will move to something else and therefore the rule is to destroy the former and praise the new. We see a perfect example of that strategy everyday.


Reply 47 - Posted by: proud2bninfidel, 2/17/2013 9:42:16 AM     (No. 9181339)

DHSbook. there, fixed it for you.


Reply 48 - Posted by: LZK, 2/17/2013 9:44:10 AM     (No. 9181341)

I signed up to see what it was all about years ago. I tried to delete them -- but -- couldn´t so I just delete the messages when they arrive on my email.....

It´s stupid!!

AND -- now WE find out facebook didn´t pay any taxes....What is that all about?

LZK


Reply 49 - Posted by: jorgecito, 2/17/2013 9:55:41 AM     (No. 9181362)

Somewhere I read that Facebook pretty much destroyed the high school reunion tradition.

Seems that people attended their class reunions mainly out of curiosity about how their old classmates had aged.

And though Facebook subscribers tend to post flattering photos of themselves, those pics are apparently enough to satisfy their old classmates´ curiosity.


Reply 50 - Posted by: trapper, 2/17/2013 9:59:06 AM     (No. 9181366)

Zuckerberg played it brilliantly. When it comes to tech, it is not alwyas immediately apparent whether you just invented the Apple personal computer or a pet rock. A game changer or a useless novelty? So make as much money as you can as quickly as possible, because next year they might not remember your name. The real question is whether Z is just a one hit wonder. I suppose at this point, what does he care, but he is way too young to waste the rest of his life just spending his money. My guess is he´s got nothing else. That was it. On the OTHER other hand, they´re still selling etch-a-sketches.


Reply 51 - Posted by: Nan, 2/17/2013 10:04:37 AM     (No. 9181373)

I seldom go to Facebook. It has become a bore.


Reply 52 - Posted by: MamaD, 2/17/2013 10:15:08 AM     (No. 9181392)

Wow---lots of passionate posts about something most of you say you´d never use.

I happen to really like Facebook. I have friends and family spread out across the country, and it´s a wonderful way to keep up with their lives. I really like knowing about my nephew´s wrestling tournament, or seeing a picture of my North Carolina friend´s latest quilt. I enjoy reading my far-away sister´s hilarious comments. Group members use Facebook as an efficient way to let others know what´s going on. Businesses use it to spread the word about special sales, etc. There are easy ways to block out the annoying stuff.

I guess I´m in the minority here. But hey--I like Christmas newsletters too.


Reply 53 - Posted by: starboard, 2/17/2013 10:35:59 AM     (No. 9181428)

After hearing about the big tax break awarded to Facebook this week, I immediately thought what was bartered for this favor. Let´s see....information comes to mind.

#43 Your advise is well taken. Better yet, I plan to cease and desist all personal Facebook activity, even though I never did much with it. Flying under the radar of the big Fedbook is more my style.


Reply 54 - Posted by: chicodon, 2/17/2013 10:38:56 AM     (No. 9181434)

For me I use FB to post some of my nature photography for friends and family. Occasionally I post a new song or interesting story. I have friends in bands and they will post their latest songs. Right now I have the final few racks of a nail biter billiards championship posted that my family likes. I stay away from politics as most of my family are LoFo.

I also use FB to log into various media sites moderated by DISQUS to leave comments. They use the FB commenting model. That is a different world where my political side can come out separate from FB. It´s robust back and forth high volume conversations and I´ve received likes in the thousands (from fellow conservatives of course). Luckily they don´t count dislikes from liberals as they would be high too. :-) So FB is more than just a gossip site for teenagers swooning over One Direction. It can be a portal to other opportunities.


Reply 55 - Posted by: OperaBuff, 2/17/2013 10:40:25 AM     (No. 9181435)

I stopped using Facebook about 2 years ago, the day I discovered they had copied all the phone numbers on my cell phone onto their central computer. At first they denied doing it to people, but eventually they were forced to fess up. Bunch of liars. I really don´t miss it.


Reply 56 - Posted by: RedWhiteBlue, 2/17/2013 10:42:37 AM     (No. 9181443)

To me Facebook is more trouble than it´s worth andTwitter is just childish. I never look at people´s Facebook pages and never tweet. Even the name is goofy.


Reply 57 - Posted by: coldoc, 2/17/2013 10:44:07 AM     (No. 9181447)

Facebook is just plain creepy. If you want to post pictures there are better mediums. If you want to feel "involved", get out of your basement for a change.


Reply 58 - Posted by: Arby, 2/17/2013 10:47:26 AM     (No. 9181458)

If only Christopher Lasch was alive. He could write ´Narcissism, the ultimate sequel´. Facebook is a sad, sad indicator of how low we´ve fallen.


Reply 59 - Posted by: scarface67, 2/17/2013 10:47:55 AM     (No. 9181460)


Agree wholeheartedly with #28.



Reply 60 - Posted by: Eheu Fugaces, 2/17/2013 10:48:48 AM     (No. 9181463)

Facebook is the most useless, empty fad since the Pet Rock. Like all fads and crazes, its impetus comes from the human herd instinct, which dictates we must all be doing something because "everyone else is doing it." When Facebook first infested the Internet, it was mostly adopted by teenagers overcome with their own importance in the universe, and by grandmothers posting recipes or pictures of their grandkids. From there it grew into the pervasive, privacy-violating nuisance we have today.

If it is true that the Facebook fad is waning, then get out your Hula Hoops, guys, and celebrate.


Reply 61 - Posted by: RancherJack, 2/17/2013 10:50:08 AM     (No. 9181469)

What is Facebook?


Reply 62 - Posted by: smcchk, 2/17/2013 10:51:18 AM     (No. 9181474)

If you don´t use it and don´t care, then we don´t need to know. Those that use it or quit using it have relevant comments. Facebook keeps me connected to my family and friends that I would not be able to as easily. It´s wonderful, in my estimation. If you don´t enjoy it, stay off.


Reply 63 - Posted by: guybee, 2/17/2013 11:12:03 AM     (No. 9181509)

How is Facebook a tax cheat for deducting compensation to their employees? Every business does this. They just passed the tax on to the individuals.

The government got the same amount of tax. Cheating occurs when no one pays the tax. Those who are complaining - did you want FB to pay the tax and then pay it out to the individuals who would also pay the tax?


Reply 64 - Posted by: frew, 2/17/2013 11:15:24 AM     (No. 9181514)

It´s not clear from reading the Pew Poll linked in the article that these shifts in Facebook use translate to a decline in overall membership. It seems some people go off for a while for various reasons and then come back on. Only 10% left because they regarded it as a waste of time.

Looks to me like the author over-reached with his conclusions.


Reply 65 - Posted by: Songstress, 2/17/2013 11:19:39 AM     (No. 9181520)

"Facebook is the crockpot of the devil." Hilarious!

I just checked out my niece´s new senior pictures, made plans to meet up (for the third year in a row) with my best old high school friend that I reconnected with on FB, and found a new quilt block pattern to try.

It is what you make it.


Reply 66 - Posted by: garyhope, 2/17/2013 11:33:57 AM     (No. 9181542)

I´m thinking of "deactivating". All my posts didn´t manage to save the world from "The Won", didn´t convince any of my "friends", relatives and real friends not to vote for him or the lefties. Many or most of them simply won´t read anything antithetical to the Won.

It´s also an enormous waste or usage of time and for what? Pictures of somebodies breakfast, lunch or dinner? Pictures of their dogs and cats, cars and kids?



Reply 67 - Posted by: O.S. Banker, 2/17/2013 11:35:26 AM     (No. 9181544)

Facebook is like a well honed wood chisel. In the hands of a skilled user it creates beautiful carvings. In the hands of a novice it creates tooth-picks. In the hands of evil, it destroys.


Reply 68 - Posted by: ketchuplover, 2/17/2013 11:42:29 AM     (No. 9181554)

If it´s "free", they´re making money off you. I signed up for a FB account a couple of years ago to see what the craze was. I used a fake name,(I´ll say: Zeke Zibble). I never posted anything, nor accepted or denied "friends", nor gave out but the bare minimal info on me. Once or twice a week I still get notices in my spam folder that I have "two friends" trying to contact me. I will get emails from FB asking me if I know so-and-so, someone I hadn´t heard of since high school 40 years ago! The kicker was last week when I was talking to a Romanian friend living in Italy. He asked me if I knew a Zeke Zibble. I said, "Why?" He said that his FB account connected him to Zeke Zibble and Zeke Zibble has MY phone number! (I never gave FB my phone number.) I join the chorus that FB has become an invasive Big Brother and a venue for insecure, lonely, narcissistic people. They whore out your name and info to others to make a "FB" - "Fast Buck". It´s as bad as Wells Fargo -ever since I signed up for an account with them, I´ve been flooded with junk mail from credit card companies, etc.


Reply 69 - Posted by: silencedogood, 2/17/2013 11:43:59 AM     (No. 9181557)

My "personal" page is of little use or interest. However, my "business" page is a great marketing tool.


Reply 70 - Posted by: JHHolliday, 2/17/2013 11:53:12 AM     (No. 9181572)

Like a lot of you I got a FB account so we could see pics and news on our children and grandchildren.

don´t worry too much about Zero marking me as an enemy of the state...I am a lifetime member of the NRA and the Sons of Confederate Veterans so I am certainly on ´The List" as such.

However, if you are otherwise ´clean´ I would not sign up for FB. Our privacy is already compromised enough without helping them out.


Reply 71 - Posted by: pomom, 2/17/2013 11:55:21 AM     (No. 9181579)

I prefer keeping in touch with close friends via emails. They attach photos sometimes, an I find it a little more personal than Facebook.

I guess young families are super busy these days so they use Facebook to let everyone know what they´re up to.

My beef with Facebook is that they´re in lockstep with Obama, they skated somehow on taxes, and I believe they´re capturing and forwarding your personal info. to the dems.


Reply 72 - Posted by: JawjaPeach, 2/17/2013 12:16:48 PM     (No. 9181602)

My last post on FB was in April 2012. I have not missed it one bit.


Reply 73 - Posted by: gator, 2/17/2013 12:22:30 PM     (No. 9181610)

Forget FB, join ´The Tea Party Communitiy",

https://www.teapartycommunity.com/


Reply 74 - Posted by: UNCDoc, 2/17/2013 12:36:33 PM     (No. 9181633)

I´m with #28. I knew this would bring out a generous share of pedestal-squatters proudly declaring that they are not FB users, as if this somehow shows them to be independent thinkers and worldly.
I still use FB, and I still like it, for the most part. I´ve connected with old friends and actually made some great new ones. I also get directed to a number of links that I´m interested, from news to sports to discussion groups. It is easy to make it too frequent a habit, however. But to those of you who are so quick to criticize those who enjoy it, congratulations. And try not to injure your shoulder with all of that patting yourself on the back.


Reply 75 - Posted by: udanja99, 2/17/2013 12:42:09 PM     (No. 9181642)

I quit Facebook back during the "Arab Spring" when the Muslim Brotherhood were using it to organize. The powers that be there had no problem with the MB´s using it but would not allow the TEA party to do likewise.

I don´t know why, but after deactivating my page, I´ve never received any correspondence from Facebook at all.

If Facebook tanks, two things will happen - a lot of people will need to be put on suicide watch and the damnocrats will have a much harder time organizing their hoards of fraudulent voters.


Reply 76 - Posted by: miceal, 2/17/2013 12:50:41 PM     (No. 9181650)

Deactivated my face book account right after the election last November due to censorship issues with face book. Joined the "tea party community" but quit there too because they also censor posts. Don´t tweet either....


Reply 77 - Posted by: pete moss, 2/17/2013 1:02:36 PM     (No. 9181667)

I kick myself in the butt for ever having had a Facebook account. However, it didn´t take long for me to come to my senses and abandon it. I am now a proud ex- Facebook user. If Obama approves of it, it´s a no brainer to dump it.


Reply 78 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 2/17/2013 1:04:43 PM     (No. 9181669)

Hell is other people. The more you know them, the more real is your hell.


Reply 79 - Posted by: FL_Absentee_Voter, 2/17/2013 1:07:20 PM     (No. 9181671)

My wife had an account for a while. Concluded from her sister-in-law´s posts that she was having multiple affairs. The rest of the family refused to believe it. Turns out she was right. Fascinating, but I still refuse to participate.


Reply 80 - Posted by: tomanderson61, 2/17/2013 1:15:24 PM     (No. 9181680)

I have no problem with any networking tool.

If it keeps people in contact, if information of all types can be more easily shared, and if it gives people some downtime fun rather than drinking or other things that boredom leads too, that´s all upside.

Like everything else, it can be overused and become a compulsion. An interesting thought...how many complainers here spend maybe just a little too much time on Lucianne?!

My personal experience is I have been on for about a year, don´t go on much, but a guy I hardly remember from high school friended me. He friended also a good chunk of my graduating class.

The fulfilling part of that was seeing what happened to so many of the popular guys, and the pretty girls that would not give me the time of day in high school. Most of the guys are blubbery with big heavy faces, and most of the hot girls just look like someone´s flabby old tired mom. I could only find one other guy besides myself that is in any kind of good physical shape or doesn´t look 10-20 years older than me, easily.

The worm turns, doesn´t it.


Reply 81 - Posted by: jackburton, 2/17/2013 1:18:06 PM     (No. 9181686)

I use facebook. I´ve ´liked´ pages by John Podhoretz, Chicks on the Right, Jan Morgan, Surber, Thayrone Xington, Taranto, Ben Swann and gotten in on some of their nascent thoughts and more of their personality. There are great sites/pages like Sarah Palin´s, No Lapdog Media, Newsbusters and Federalist Papers.

I hate to say this but I´ve noticed a drop in output over here on lucianne... and I´ve noticed some overlap and even more stuff getting linked and posted on FB on the conservative sites there.

BTW, as I share conservative cartoons and ´like´ conservative posts, I´m sure I´m getting excised from peoples´ ´like´ lists. So what.

Check out the Day By Day cartoon by Chris Muir.


Reply 82 - Posted by: roger h. cook,MD, 2/17/2013 1:30:58 PM     (No. 9181703)

What or who ever is on face book is on for ever an there for the world to see, dah


Reply 83 - Posted by: bob913, 2/17/2013 1:33:04 PM     (No. 9181704)

Mark Zuckerberg stole the idea and cheated those that started Facebook. The people who run Facebook committed stock fraud with help from Wall Street and the news media hype.

There are no 900,000,000 users. Cannot be. Look at the population of the USA and Europe etc. Not that many people online and certainly not using Facebook.

They sell your information without your consent and constantly change settings so you cannot feel secure in what you post.

Your photos belong to them - they were caught trying to claim this so backed off for a bit but they will try again. Your company can check Facebook for your posts which may get you fired or not even hired in the first place.

And... they are a source along with google for information for the democrats to help undermine this country.


Reply 84 - Posted by: so_free_me, 2/17/2013 1:33:20 PM     (No. 9181705)

Beware of polls that ask people about future intentions. We all intend to be better people by and by, right? And ditto for polls that people feel they should answer in a certain way. So many morally superior types put down FB (usually without understanding why we use it) that it takes courage to say you are a "user."


Reply 85 - Posted by: fritzilou, 2/17/2013 1:44:14 PM     (No. 9181723)

I abandoned Facebook, because it became something that I did not want. It was my thought process that this would be a private connectivity between invited guests, but it turned into a vast array of people whose utterences were posted on my page. The utterences of others would offend one person or another, so I bid it goodbye. I have not missed it.


Reply 86 - Posted by: so_free_me, 2/17/2013 1:44:46 PM     (No. 9181725)

What is wrong with you judgmental people??? I get to speak to people in Ireland, Ghana, Indonesia and Canada through FB. I get to see all my grandkids and many of my great nieces and nephews each and every week. I simply do not understand the hatred most of you have towards it.


Reply 87 - Posted by: TrikiTriki, 2/17/2013 1:59:02 PM     (No. 9181740)

Remember MySpace? They were (are) a predecessor to Facebook. They both do the same thing but somehow MySpace became uncool and it disappeared from the radar faster than a fart in a fan factory.

I wish someone could explain to me how the googles or facebooks of the world make that kind of money. I have never clicked on any ads and if i did I wouldn´t buy anything anyways. Do people actually click and buy?


Reply 88 - Posted by: Suse, 2/17/2013 2:04:54 PM     (No. 9181744)

I "like" #47 & #53 :-)
I started using FB back when my son was Iiving in an isolated mt community in WA state where they have no phones, tv, radio, but did have Internet and it was easier for him to post photos via FB than email. Our family uses FB mostly to share photos of the grandbabies :-)


Reply 89 - Posted by: Seniorchief, 2/17/2013 2:19:13 PM     (No. 9181760)

I use Facebook to primarily connect and stay in touch wth far flung members of my extended family, from the U.K. to Australia, and points in between. I used it to help coordinate a Family Reunion in Scotland several years back. So it definitely has its usefulness. However a lot of the features they have added lately are meaningless fluff.


Reply 90 - Posted by: bob913, 2/17/2013 2:50:14 PM     (No. 9181791)

From another article at slashdot:
"Despite earning more than $1 billion in profits last year, social media juggernaut Facebook paid zilch when it came to federal and state taxes in 2012. In fact, the website will actually be getting a refund totaling $429 million thanks to a tax reduction for executive stock options. In the coming years, Facebook will continue to get monster tax breaks, totaling about $3 billion.

´The employees cash in stock options, and at that point there is tax deduction for the company,´ Robert McIntyre, of watchdog group Citizens for Tax Justice, said.

´Because even though it doesn´t cost Facebook a nickel, the government treats it as wages and they get a deduction for it.´"


Reply 91 - Posted by: yuban, 2/17/2013 2:55:38 PM     (No. 9181796)

You can get family updates and pics etc in e-mails. No need for everyone to see your stuff. As for finding long lost school chums from 40 yrs ago, if I made it 40 yrs without them, I don´t need them. Sorry, I ain´t that lonely yet.


Reply 92 - Posted by: mitzi, 2/17/2013 3:04:48 PM     (No. 9181807)

Facebook didn´t write tax laws/loopholes.

You can´t blame them for just following the law as written.


Reply 93 - Posted by: M Stuart, 2/17/2013 3:25:09 PM     (No. 9181820)

I enjoy FB. I stay in touch with family & friends, read Chicks on the Right and other blog pages, and I know how to adjust my account. No games. No apps.


Reply 94 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 2/17/2013 3:26:48 PM     (No. 9181821)

#93, agree completely, especially about the long lost school friends, etc.

Besides, if I don´t want to find them, do I want them able to find me?


Reply 95 - Posted by: 4Justice, 2/17/2013 4:26:46 PM     (No. 9181903)

I agree with 5 & 8. I mainly started using FB a couple years ago for my 30 year reunion. I got to talk to folks I hadn´t seen in over 20 years. It was fun for a while but now I mostly just use it to post important articles. Most of the folks just ignore them but some like them. Most of the hard lefties unfriended me. I used to get into some heavy debates in the beginning but that ended eventually. Anyway, I still go there once in a while but not often. As a Marketer, I am supposed to love social media. Ugh...Yes, I set up an FB site for my company but LinkedIn is so much better for us because we are so specialized. Other than that, I would be happy if social media burned out. I prefer more traditional forms of marketing anyway. It is more fun creating print ads and less time pressure.


Reply 96 - Posted by: Republic Can, 2/17/2013 5:03:54 PM     (No. 9181939)

I could not in good conscience support Zucker any longer. I unfriended him last month after another pro liberal stance on something none of his business. Forget which one it was. Besides the politics, the continual leakage of personal information and dancing lawyers was enough to get me to go out and buy envelopes and stamps.

The stock was a fantasy - a ´social media bubble.´ Evidently investors didn´t learn from the 1999 tech burst. I do hope only the pampered elite get burned when FB burns out.


Reply 97 - Posted by: Caveman, 2/17/2013 5:14:33 PM     (No. 9181956)

Well since I can´t stand most people, being on Faceplant is really not going to do much for me. I have caller ID so I know not to answer the phone when most people call me.
I prefer to catch up with family every 6 months or so. That way I can get the important hi-lights, without the day to day boring stuff.


Reply 98 - Posted by: get er done, 2/17/2013 5:20:39 PM     (No. 9181966)

Years ago, a friend asked me if I wanted to participate in her "church" website. It turned out that she registered me on Facebook without my knowledge or consent, and against my husband´s expressed wishes. To this day, Facebook sends me unsolicited emails telling me I have x number of friends requests and new messages, and urging me to "reactivate" my account. My husband´s objection was that what is posted on social websites is there for all the world to see and can become the property of the social network.


Reply 99 - Posted by: BigGeorgeTX, 2/17/2013 5:34:14 PM     (No. 9181984)

Like a gun, FB is just a tool. My extended family is spread out here and in Europe. I use it to stay involved with them, don´t friend strangers nor accept them as friends, post rarely and could live without it if I had too. IMO those whose friend lists total more than 100 are being way too casual with their friendships.


Reply 100 - Posted by: Holoholo, 2/17/2013 6:07:43 PM     (No. 9182026)

I had a hotdog baked inside a croissant for lunch. Burp.



Post Reply   Close thread 723768

Next (100) Replies   End of Thread  



Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Guns Responsible for Global Warming
American Spectator, by Jed Babbin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 6:14:16 AM     Post Reply
Frustration is taking its toll in the liberals’ war against guns. President Obama, pushing his broad gun control agenda, said we should be ashamed if we’ve forgotten the Newtown shooting so soon. The New York Times opined that Obama is being shouted down by the “gun lobby,” even though he and Biden had been crisscrossing the country “…making a forceful case for a package of laws that would reduce gun violence.” That, of course, is the media narrative on gun control. For every issue there is a narrative: a set of assumptions and boundaries of thought

Complex Napoleon Rivalry
Heads for Its Waterloo
Wall Street Journal, by Max Colchester    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:52:11 AM     Post Reply
GOLFE-JUAN, France—Frank Samson has prepared for a long time to meet his Waterloo. The French lawyer impersonates Napoleon Bonaparte at re-enactment battles, but it is no idle hobby. Mr. Samson has found what he says are perfect replicas of the French general´s gray overcoat, he has studied Napoleon´s native Corsican tongue and he has had himself crowned emperor of France, in a cathedral yet. In 2015, he wants to lead thousands of military enthusiasts into the ultimate re-enactment: the 200th anniversary of the battle of Waterloo in Belgium. But an American rival stands in his way. Mark Schneider, an actor in Virginia

Repeal, Replace, Still
National Review Online, by Ramesh Ponnuru & Yuval Levin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:42:18 AM     Post Reply
Is it time to give up the fight against Obamacare? That’s a question some conservative health-care experts, pundits, and — more quietly — politicians are asking. In the first years after its passage, opponents had hoped that the Supreme Court would strike down the law or that a new president would sign its repeal before most of it took effect. But the Supreme Court decided to modify a few of its provisions instead of striking it down, and President Obama was reelected. Repeal is almost certainly off the table for four years. Obamacare will continue to be implemented.

Division among Republicans
on Gang of Eight?
Washington Examiner, by Byron York    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:37:13 AM     Post Reply
As the bipartisan Gang of Eight works to complete a comprehensive immigration reform bill, there has been a growing consensus among Senate Republicans that the bill — so far seen by no one outside the Gang — should be the subject of multiple hearings and extended consideration inside the Senate Judiciary Committee. But on Sunday there were signs that consensus does not extend to the Republicans inside the Gang. Appearing on CBS, longtime immigration reform advocate and Gang member Sen. John McCain suggested the immigration issue is so familiar to lawmakers that multiple hearings will not be necessary.

Liars! Illegal Immigration
Surging While Obama Administration
Claims it is Declining
Gateway Pundit, by Mike LaRoche    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:25:44 AM     Post Reply
Via Fox Nation, newly released statistics show that illegal immigrant infiltration along the U.S.-Mexico border is increasing markedly despite recent statements to the contrary by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano: “I can tell you having worked that border for 20 years, it is more secure now than it has ever been. Illegal apprehensions are at 40-year lows,” Napolitano told reporters this week in Houston. But figures released Thursday by Customs and Border Protection to Fox News tell a different story. Arrests are actually up 13 percent

Obama´s Dangerous Nuclear Dance
Daily Beast, by Leslie H. Gelb    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:11:33 AM     Post Reply
The White House press corps should ask President Obama this question: You’ve told Iran’s leaders that if they come close to marrying a nuclear warhead with a missile that can hit the United States or our allies, they should expect a U.S. military attack on their soil. (Snip)Administration officials would never admit it, but the main reason for their being tougher on Iran than North Korea seems tied to American domestic politics as much or more than anything else, specifically the standing of Israel and oil versus Korea and Japan.

How Texas Became
Texas and Why It Matters
New York Times, by Bryan Burrough    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:04:06 AM     Post Reply
AS a Texas-raised journalist, I can tell you two things with confidence about my native state. One, its economy has been humming nicely for years. Two, this appears to greatly offend a certain breed of Northern writer, several of whom have descended on the state in an attempt to rebut stories of a “Texas miracle.” (Snip) “Texas has a long tradition of looking outside the government for support — and often finding it. That predates the Texas revolution and was reinforced by the rise of the cattle kingdom and the oil booms.”

Left Celebrates the Death
of Rick Warren’s Son
PJ Media, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 4:55:58 AM     Post Reply
One of the more disturbing aspects of the internet culture — fed largely by the ability to post anonymously — is the rash of mean, hateful comments made following the death of a prominent figure associated with one side or the other. It’s a disease that afflicts both sides. The death of Ted Kennedy a few years ago brought out the haters on the right to an unprecedented degree. The vitriol and foul language as well as carefully composed comments designed to inflict the maximum amount of pain that were the rule on the right

ATF pulls license of
one particular gun shop
Hot Air, by Jazz Shaw    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 4:53:04 AM     Post Reply
It took little more than the headline of this article to begin raising eyebrows Gun shop that sold to mother of Newtown shooter loses license (Reuters) – The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms said on Friday it had revoked the federal license of a Connecticut gun retailer that sold a weapon to the mother of Adam Lanza, who killed 26 people at an elementary school in December. The agency on December 20 revoked the license of Riverview Gun Sales in East Windsor, Connecticut, ATF spokeswoman Debora Seifert said.

Swanky Beach Enclave Seeks
Relief From Bird Stench
Associated Press, by Julie Watson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 4:43:43 AM     Post Reply
La Jolla´s jagged coastline is strictly protected by environmental laws to ensure the San Diego community remains the kind of seaside jewel that has attracted swanky restaurants, top-flight hotels and some of the nation´s rich and famous, including billionaire businessman Irwin Jacobs and former presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Tourists flock to the place. So do birds. Lots of birds. And with those birds comes lots of poop. So rather than gasping in amazement at the beautiful views, some are holding their noses from the stench coming from the droppings that cake coastal rocks and outcroppings near its business district.

America’s Foes Call Obama’s Bluff
FrontPage Magazine, by Daniel Greenfield    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 4:38:19 AM     Post Reply
Obama, Kerry and Hagel thought that they had a plan for putting North Korea back in the box. North Korea had conducted a nuclear test in February, violating once again the various understandings that had been worked out. But agreements and understandings, written or oral, had never meant much to the repressive regime which had suspended the Armistice Agreement that ended the Korean War numerous times—including last month. So Obama decided to wave a stick. The playbook for North Korea would feature flights by B-2 and B-52 bombers and F-22 fighter jets to remind

How America Lost
Its Four Great Generals
Commentary Magazine, by Max Boot    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 3:01:19 PM     Post Reply
The quasi-official ideology of the U.S. armed forces holds that generals are virtually interchangeable, that individual personalities don’t matter much, that ordinary grunts are in any case more important than their leaders, and that what really counts are larger systems that make a complex bureaucracy function. There is some truth to all of this. But for all of the bureaucratic heft of the services and the heroism of ordinary soldiers, it is hard to imagine the Civil War having been won without Grant, Sherman, and Sheridan—or World War II without Marshall, Eisenhower, Patton, Bradley, Arnold, LeMay, Nimitz, Halsey,



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
73 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

68 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

66 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Christians, here´s why we´re
losing our religion

53 replie(s)
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM     Post Reply
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”

Broadcasters worry
about ´Zero TV´ homes

48 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM     Post Reply
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

44 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

42 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

The Secrets of Princeton
40 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Is going gluten-free
healthier for everybody?

34 replie(s)
The Week, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/7/2013 11:28:27 AM     Post Reply
Gluten-free diets are all the rage, but they can be dangerous if not done right. What is gluten? It´s the spongy complex of proteins, found naturally in wheat, rye, and barley, that gives elasticity to dough and allows it to rise. When flour is moistened and either kneaded or mixed into dough, gluten molecules form an elastic, microscopic latticework that traps the carbon dioxide produced when yeast ferments, causing dough to inflate like a hot air balloon. Baking hardens the gluten, which helps the finished product keep its shape. Wheat — and gluten — is ubiquitous in the American diet.

Kim Jong-un Wants Phone
Call from Obama - report

34 replie(s)
Korea Broadcast Service, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/8/2013 6:56:50 AM     Post Reply
North Korea’s young leader Kim Jong-un is waiting for United States President Barack Obama to make a phone call to Pyongyang to discuss easing tensions on the Korean peninsula, according to Russia’s news agency Itar-Tass. The report cited United Kingdom diplomats, saying Pyongyang was demanding the U.S. president personally call Kim Jong-un as one of the conditions to relieve the current conflict at hand. Itar-Tass also quoted the U.K.’s Sky News as saying North Korea currently has eight nuclear warheads.

Adam Lanza´s murder spree at Sandy
Hook may have been´act of revenge´

31 replie(s)
New York Daily News, by Matthew Lysiak and Rich Schapiro    Original Article
Posted By: noproblems- 4/7/2013 9:52:58 AM     Post Reply
Newtown killer Adam Lanza may have launched his murder spree at Sandy Hook Elementary School as an “act of revenge,” the Daily News has learned. A close friend of Lanza’s mother told The News that the troubled boy was a target of relentless bullying when he attended the Connecticut school years ago. “I think Adam felt betrayed by the school and this was his act of revenge,” said Marvin LaFontaine, a friend of Nancy Lanza’s. “Nancy told me he was being picked on at school. That they were just torturing him.”
Source and text corrected by Staff.


Post Reply   Close thread 723768

Next (100) Replies   End of Thread  




Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS