They´ve finally had enough! Good for them!

Most amusing! It´ll be pretty interesting when the cops have to go to the gang-bangers for armament...

A bit less amusing is the few billion hollow point rounds the Feds are stockpiling. Guess ´ammo banned in international warfare´ isn´t too good for the American public.

And of course the ´target practice´ excuse is totally bogus - unless government just thinks paying 45% more for hollow points to shoot at paper is a ´good use of taxpayer monies´...

As noted in Alice in Wonderland - "Curiouser and curiouser..."

Great idea! However, I was hoping it would be some of the largest gun manufacturers. Wouldn´t it be great if Glock, S&W, etc., would not sell to states that disregard our Second Amendment.

This is interesting.

A government edict will wipe away such contrivances.

Wow! The companies that manufacture ammunition should follow this example as well!

Let´s see if there is going to be any backlash now from the Department of Injustice......

Maybe Holder can get the druggies in Mexico to send back the Fast and Furious guns....

Kudos to these corporations!
NOW It´s time for the TOP gun manufaturers to join the effort. Ruger, Sig, Glock, Beretta, S&W, etc. PLUS all the ammunition manufacturers.

Gub´mints need to learn the simple rule.....Actions have consequences.

Can the gun companies teach the Republican party how to organize like this?

I read a science fiction story in Analog about 30-40 years ago where the corporations did just this. All corporations. If you worked for such a government you couldn´t get gas, food, service, etc. Neither could the governments. And the corporations had their own military, so the governments couldn´t successfully use force.

Today in the US the people are their own military to prevent government use of force. Perhaps more companies should stop doing business with totalitarian leaning governments such as ours, to shove them firmly back inside the confines of the constitutional boundary set a few centuries back in the greatest political experiment in mankind´s history.

Many gun companies, such as Ruger and S&W, are publically traded and cannot do this. However, I don´t believe Glock and Baretta are. If Glock were to halt sales of guns, parts, or any such support, the blue-suited, jackbooted (tm) thugocracy would grind to a halt. Go for it, Glaston!

My husband suggested NY state hunters and fishers boycott buying state licenses this year. Hit them where they will feel it the most-in the state coffers.

It´s a start. We the People are fully awake now.

I´ll cheer when FMA, Springfield, Glock, HK, Sig Sauer, Colt and SW do the same .. and include California and Illinois

I´m with #8...let Federal and the other ammo suppliers tell Uncle Obama that he has enough ammo, and their private sales now take precedent. That´s assuming that these companies aren´t in cahoots...someone is making money, whether from the government sales contracts or the rising cost of private ammo driven by the old supply-demand curve. Some call that a win-win.

It´s starting to feel like a revolution is coming. Scary.

And bullet manufacturers need to refuse contracts with Napolitano´s goon agency which is arming itself with billions of bullets to use against Americans. Boycott the Feds!

Glock won´t do it--that´s my guess. They would lose too much money. Hadn´t thought of the "publicly-traded" angle for the other guys, but I expect that would indeed keep them from joining in--unless the shareholders voted to do so. I´m just hoping some of these on-board guys have specialty items that the cops really, really want.

It wouldn’t hurt if gun buyers let the publicly held manufacturers know that their nest purchase will be only from one those companies that are boycotting.

Don´t get too excited folks.

Many police departments allow officers to buy their own equipment from a list of allowed firearms, and they are free to pass over the department provided gun.

Police and government agencies elsewhere could follow the same program--agents get their own guns and get reimbursed for them.

So this is a good in terms of standing up for something, but in a practical sense does nothing.

FTA: "...a class of government employees with rights and and a class of citizens without rights." Yup! That about sums it up.

It would me nice if firearms purchasers in non-2nd Amendment abusing states were to inform the big gun manufacturers (e.g., Sig Sauer, S&W, H&R) that their pending purchases will only go to a company that has put its profits where its principles are.

It would also be nice if we stopped depending on others, like John Roberts, et al., to protect our freedoms. When was the last time you called, e-mailed or wrote expressing your displeasure/fears?

Then there is Ted "Gallo con Peine Grande" Cruz and his letter to Rahm Emmanuel and gun manufacturers...BOLD!

Oh, well. States that restrict citizen gun rights would probably be happier with buying Comm-block weapons anyway.

I think Barrett was the first to do this, as CA banned their .50 for us peons they refused to service the LA SWAT Barretts

#11, In a way "Atlas Shrugged" did this.