A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


The G.O.P.’s Nasty Newcomer
New York Times, by Frank Bruni

Original Article

Posted By:mikkins2, 2/16/2013 4:51:23 AM

When a Vesuvius like John McCain tells you that you belch too much smoke and spew too much fire, you know you’ve got a problem. And Ted Cruz, a Republican freshman in the Senate who has been front and center in his party’s effort to squash Chuck Hagel’s nomination as secretary of defense, has a problem. He’s an ornery, swaggering piece of work. Just six weeks since his arrival on Capitol Hill, he’s already known for his naysaying, his nit-picking and his itch to upbraid lawmakers who are vastly senior to him

Comments:
I cant think of a better endorsement of conservative bona fides then a New York Times writer telling us how "nasty" the subject is. I am sure the Republican Establishment will be slipping 3 am letters under Bruni´s office door soon, if they haven´t done so already.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: iamtinman, 2/16/2013 5:09:32 AM     (No. 9179307)

Sounds like a roaring recommendation for Senator Cruz! The senate needs fresh blood the current occupants have sat in those chairs and soaked themselves in the multitude of perks way too long. The senate was not meant to be a sinecure.

Oh, and John McCain a "Vesuvious" ? Frank Bruni needs to get out more!


Reply 2 - Posted by: klezmer, 2/16/2013 5:10:28 AM     (No. 9179308)

From the article:

Just six weeks since his arrival on Capitol Hill, he’s already known for his naysaying, his nit-picking and his itch to upbraid lawmakers who are vastly senior to him, who have sacrificed more than he has and who deserve a measure of respect, or at least an iota of courtesy.

Really? These are the guys who put us into this mess in the first place.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: chumley, 2/16/2013 5:13:55 AM     (No. 9179311)

Thats right Boy. Mind your betters and keep your mouth shut and you´ll make your million, just like we did.


Reply 4 - Posted by: locarno, 2/16/2013 5:15:52 AM     (No. 9179313)

Oh, this is rich. This Bruni rube is a typical DNC operative, both condescending, and pugnacious at the same time. FTA: ´Cruz has expressed skepticism about climate change, a position perhaps in tune with his hyperconservative base and his state’s oil interests but at odds with his apparently keen intellect.´ Frankie boy, its time to get off the kool-aid, and smell the coffee.

And this little gem: ´In questioning Hagel during the nominee’s confirmation hearing, he took a surprisingly, audaciously contemptuous tone.´ Uh, Frank. Thats what the Senators are there to do. They are there to get facts. And when they have to deal with idiots like Hagel, sometimes they have to raise their voices a little to get any cooperation. Now, I´m sure Frankie boy is going to tell us next how polite and cooperative his donks have been over these years.


Reply 5 - Posted by: miceal, 2/16/2013 5:21:15 AM     (No. 9179322)

I wish Senator Cruz would take the Senior Senator from Mississippi into a quiet room and explain the facts to his senile self. Not only did he vote to confirm the traitor Jon F´n Cary, but he voted to confirm Hagel too.... Sad, so very sad.


Reply 6 - Posted by: steveW, 2/16/2013 5:26:16 AM     (No. 9179325)

They are already trying to take out the GOP´s brightest lights for 2014 and 2016, like they did with Palin. If the bright lights make the mistake of playing defense, instead of exposing the attackers, they´re toast.


Reply 7 - Posted by: afherkdriver, 2/16/2013 5:35:19 AM     (No. 9179330)

I agree with #6.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Knotwyrkin, 2/16/2013 5:42:12 AM     (No. 9179336)

Two NYT articles abtou Nasty Cruz in the first 10 this morning. Somebody is doing something right!


Reply 9 - Posted by: bugger, 2/16/2013 5:52:57 AM     (No. 9179345)

Ted just doesn´t get it according to the Times. Der vil be no opposition to de fuher.

Just ignore the tyrannical press Ted. Their blatant attempts to crush opposition have become childlike in their predictability and ignorance.


Reply 10 - Posted by: judy, 2/16/2013 6:14:16 AM     (No. 9179362)

Cruz must be doing something right... the farrrr left NY Times & Politico are trashing him...kind of me reminds me of Palin...


Reply 11 - Posted by: mws50, 2/16/2013 6:18:52 AM     (No. 9179365)

Thanks, Frank Bruni, for publishing more proof that journalism has devolved into the dumbest profession on this planet.

I enjoy reading about you leftards´ hissy fits about a normal person that actually asks intelligent questions of the sychopants amassed in DC and expects a rational answer.

Oh, and thanks for telling us what we conservatives should be doing in DC. Coming from someone stuck on stupid, it really means a lot to us...


Reply 12 - Posted by: judy, 2/16/2013 6:25:02 AM     (No. 9179370)

Cruz was correct when he told members of congress...stop reading the NY Times....


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: krause, 2/16/2013 6:40:12 AM     (No. 9179390)

OK Frank, now do a critique of Harry Reid.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Keekng, 2/16/2013 6:51:29 AM     (No. 9179403)

Any newcomer to Congress, who will go in there, naysay, nit-pick and upbraid self-righteous lawmakers who are overpaid, underworked and vastly self important is okay in my book.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Trigger2, 2/16/2013 6:52:17 AM     (No. 9179404)

Since the NY Slimes has to get their articles approved by the WH before they see print, why is anyone surprised by two hit pieces.


Reply 16 - Posted by: HisHandmaiden, 2/16/2013 7:12:04 AM     (No. 9179438)

Bruni needs to go back to writing about food...


Reply 17 - Posted by: dman, 2/16/2013 7:32:48 AM     (No. 9179471)

Dittos #6 et al. The politics of personal destruction continues unabated.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Achilles, 2/16/2013 7:43:28 AM     (No. 9179483)

Now for the really important issue: did Cruz have a drink of water at any time?


Reply 19 - Posted by: Freeloader, 2/16/2013 7:49:15 AM     (No. 9179495)

Nasty newcomer Mr. Bruni? What´s not to like about this brilliant, young, conservative "Texas Ranger" armed with a B.A. from Princeton and a Juris Doctor (Magna Cum Laude) from Harvard Law School?

Kinda reminds me of the world´s original "Conscience Of A Conservative," the late Barry M. Goldwater of Arizona. Who can ever forget Mr. Goldwater´s immortal words for the ages..."Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue."?


Reply 20 - Posted by: jinx, 2/16/2013 7:53:19 AM     (No. 9179500)

Sen. Cruz is a Harvard graduate which is what the Dimwits said put Obama in the position of being brilliant. He is also hispanic which means that Bruni is being racist. Oh, what fun Sen Cruz is going to have putting all of those old career politicians in their places. Love it!


Reply 21 - Posted by: franq, 2/16/2013 8:04:42 AM     (No. 9179523)

What did this Bruni person have to say about Barbara "Call Me Senator" Boxer (D-Nutland)? I suppose her tone was, uh, senatorial...


Reply 22 - Posted by: OhMy, 2/16/2013 8:06:26 AM     (No. 9179526)

Mr Cruz should wear this as a badge of honour. We need 60 more like him in the Senate. It is long past time for that. All the votes he made so far were the right ones.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: lifelonghuman, 2/16/2013 8:10:37 AM     (No. 9179537)

Bruni said the same thing about Obama who had the nerve to think he could run for president without having any qualifications. At least I think he did. I´m searching for his quote. ...Damn ! I think Google´s broke.


Reply 24 - Posted by: BarryNo, 2/16/2013 8:37:13 AM     (No. 9179604)

I hope Cruz continues to slap their chops and that some people get some backbones and stones to support him. HE is what we were looking for out of the 2010 elections.


Reply 25 - Posted by: JimS, 2/16/2013 9:01:31 AM     (No. 9179644)

The NYT needs to be very publicly called out for their racist, anti-Latino attacks on Rubio and now Cruz. The should be the talking point on all the Sunday talk shows.
Hoist them on their own petard.


Reply 26 - Posted by: LadyVet, 2/16/2013 9:18:05 AM     (No. 9179678)

Here´s hoping that when Obama and the dems give amnesty to all the illegals, that the Hispanic men all morph into Ted Cruz. The Democrat nightmare, to the max.


Reply 27 - Posted by: hotcorner, 2/16/2013 9:20:53 AM     (No. 9179681)

This means Cruz is doing all the right things. Keep it up Senator.


Reply 28 - Posted by: VAPMAN, 2/16/2013 9:24:31 AM     (No. 9179691)

Keep it up Cruz. You are a breath of fresh air in a mostly rotten senate run by the crook Harry Reid. Don´t let up and stand your ground against the onslaught of garbage the left is going to heap on you. As for the NYTs, the trees would be put to better use making toilet paper.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Starlady, 2/16/2013 9:26:19 AM     (No. 9179698)

Who came out looking better after the McCain scold of Cruz? Not McCain.I am extremely tired of the fraternity/exclusive club atmosphere of our Senate. I am all in favor of young whippersnappers shaking it all up. Rubio did not take a back seat after his election in 2010 and neither should Cruz. Go Tea Party!


Reply 30 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 2/16/2013 9:42:39 AM     (No. 9179729)

McCain, the poster child for a "go along to get along" Republican. I voted for Cruz, and am darn sure glad he won.


Reply 31 - Posted by: LanieLou, 2/16/2013 10:11:45 AM     (No. 9179833)

McCain, poster boy for the Progressive GOPer, is annoyed that someone will soon be calling him out for treasonous support of Obama´s agenda.


Reply 32 - Posted by: lonecoolman, 2/16/2013 10:52:35 AM     (No. 9179931)

The senior senators of both parties neither have earned any respect nor deserve respect.
I say hang them all! Traitors one and all!

Mccain, what a blow hole!


Reply 33 - Posted by: toddh, 2/16/2013 11:39:49 AM     (No. 9180043)

He´s the damned restaurant critic writing on politics? Such idiocy forces doubt about his qualification for either position.


Reply 34 - Posted by: BigGeorgeTX, 2/16/2013 12:13:51 PM     (No. 9180109)

I´m sure I´m not the only one who recalls how our cabal of Palin haters were also the ones saying how Cruz was not collegial enough and that´s why they were voting for David Dewhurst for TX senator in 2012. Interesting how none of them have appeared on this thread.


Reply 35 - Posted by: JoniTx, 2/16/2013 2:38:42 PM     (No. 9180362)

LOL!! Thanks Mr. Bruni. Play nice? Like the democrat party does?

~~And right now the Republican Party accommodates too much quackery, belligerence and misplaced moralism to play a fully credible part in a vital, essential debate about the size and scope of government. The party should be a place where voters who are reasonably concerned about government overreach can turn. It shouldn’t be a bastion of regressive social ideas and foul tempers.~~


Reply 36 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 2/16/2013 2:54:51 PM     (No. 9180405)

As a general rule, I don´t like Senators. Cruz, Inhofe, and Paul are the exceptional exceptions.


Reply 37 - Posted by: mitzi, 2/16/2013 3:13:54 PM     (No. 9180424)

I´m glad Ted Cruz is ruffling some feathers on the old Senate turkeys!



Reply 38 - Posted by: wsdiego, 2/16/2013 3:21:45 PM     (No. 9180432)

The Democrates have dished nasty out for so long Ted Cruz most be quite a shock!



Post Reply   Close thread 723658




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "mikkins2"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "mikkins2"



Time to Secede…
From the GOP
Canada Free Press, by Chip McLean    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 3/24/2013 9:51:55 AM     Post Reply
Is there anyone remaining with an IQ above room temperature who actually believes that the Republican Party believes in limited government, as defined by the U.S. constitution? If so, they have either been hibernating or have been in complete self-denial. Every election cycle the Republican Party counts on its “conservative base” to dutifully turn out and mark their ballot for whatever candidate has been selected by the GOP leadership. We are told ad infinitum that doing so will keep the Democrat liberal demons from furthering their agenda. The inside-the-beltway establishment has been chanting this mantra for years

Former Bush Adviser Continues
Crusade Against Palin, Conservatives
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 3/9/2013 6:44:54 AM     Post Reply
Former George W. Bush chief political strategist Matt Dowd continued to try to diminish Sarah Palin and conservatives by once again making false claims about the former Alaska governor. On Sunday´s "ABC´s This Week," Dowd assailed CPAC for, in his mind, lessening its credibility by inviting conservatives like Palin and not liberal Republicans favored by the northeastern elite like New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. “CPAC, to me, has totally diminished its credibility as an organization,” Dowd said

The Unofficial Merger of the GOP
and Democrat Party!
Canada Free Press, by A.J. Cameron    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 3/4/2013 8:46:39 PM     Post Reply
People continually complain that with the different faces who have disgraced the Offices of the President and Vice President, the one hundred (100) seats within the Senate and the four hundred thirty-five (435) seats within the House of Representatives, nothing improves for the masses, only for those who are elected and special interests. This is frustrating and we need to assess why, so we can change this ‘continuing resolution’. It appears that the GOP and the Democrat Party have merged.

Republicans are losing
the spending argument
Washington Post, by Chris Cillizza and Aaron Blake    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/27/2013 3:36:33 PM     Post Reply
For the past several years, congressional Republicans have focused relentlessly on a single message: Washington — led by President Obama — is spending too much money, and it needs to stop. But according to new Washington Post-ABC News polling, that laser-like focus isn’t helping Republicans win the argument over federal spending — with 67 percent of those tested disapproving of the “way Republicans in Congress are handling federal spending.”

Why Sarah Palin? Why Ted Cruz?:
´Nationalists´ and ´Federalists´
The Hill (Washington, DC), by Bernie Quigley    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/27/2013 3:09:40 PM     Post Reply
Demographics are destiny. Nothing else makes history. When the changes ahead are shipped into denial is when chaos and disaster ensue. And the potential disasters America faces today do not come from global warming, nuclear weapons, the Russians, the hippies or the rednecks. They come from the economic division of America between the red states, which are rising in capital and prosperity, and the left and right coasts, which are receding in economic power. Demographer Joel Kotkin well outlines the transition in a Wall Street Journal essay yesterday title, “America’s Red State Growth Corridors.”


Congressman Takes No
[Bleep] From Obama
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/27/2013 2:55:06 PM     Post Reply
Sophomore U.S. Rep. Mike Pompeo, R-Kansas, graduated first in his class at West Point, graduated from Harvard Law School, had a hugely successful career in the aerospace industry, and also has a think-tank background. He may be a seriously rising star. Anyway, he put out a self-explanatory press release that is a beauty to behold. Take that, Mr. Obama! Today, White House Spokesman Jay Carney asked during a press briefing what Congressman Mike Pompeo, R-Kansas, would say to defense workers facing furlough because of the President’s sequester plan. The following is his statement:

Spending kudzu
Human Events, by John Hayward    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/26/2013 9:29:04 PM     Post Reply
Senator Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) has been front and center during the latter days of the sequestration showdown, which is good, because he literally wrote the book on government waste. He produces a new edition of his “Wastebook” every year, chronicling the most absurd abuses of taxpayer money. It is wise for Republicans to bring up these horror stories when Obama is racing around the country and insisting that a 2.3 percent reduction in the rate of government growth means we can’t have firefighters or border security. Coburn’s Wastebook should be every American’s indispensable manual

A Conservative Provocateur,
Using a Blowtorch as His Pen
New York Times, by Jim Rutenberg    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/24/2013 10:05:43 AM     Post Reply
At 11:42 a.m. on Feb. 14, a conservative online magazine called The Washington Free Beacon posted a dispatch about a speech Chuck Hagel gave in 2007 in which it said he called the State Department “an adjunct to the Israeli foreign minister’s office.” The report was based on “contemporaneous” notes an attendee posted online. An hour later on the floor of the United States Senate, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina urgently cited that statement as another reason to delay Mr. Hagel’s nomination as defense secretary.

What Our Leaders Wrought:
Boehner Cries and Obama Lies
Town Hall, by John Ransom    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/24/2013 9:49:09 AM     Post Reply
twfox wrote: Jan. 24,2013 - Bobby Jindal urges the GOP to "stop being the stupid party"---hmmmm. And now you knuckle draggers want to call the Presidents supporters stupid? Good luck with that! - The Big, Big Government Push Dear Comrade Fox, You apparently don’t know the context in which Jindal was talking about “stop being the stupid party.” What Jindal is referring to are the candidates who made bizarre comments during the election, like Todd Akin the Missouri Republican, who said this about the odds of getting pregnant from rape: “From what I understand from doctors, that´s really rare.

The Banality of the RINOs
American Spectator, by Matt Purple    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/23/2013 6:45:11 AM     Post Reply
I’m told we’re living in a Moderate Moment. After Mitt Romney lost the election, moderate Republicans started emerging from every corner of the country, from Northwest Washington, D.C. to Arlington, Virginia. It was time, they declared, for calm voices to prevail in the Republican Party. The Tea Party, the right-wing, the “Conservative Entertainment Complex” — all this must be cast overboard for the GOP to win again. The latest iteration of this came in Wednesday’s Washington Post from columnist Kathleen Parker:

Why Republicans won’t win a sequester
showdown with President Obama:
A GOP response
Washington Post, by Chris Cillizza    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/20/2013 7:44:04 PM     Post Reply
Earlier today we posited that Congressional Republicans held a losing political hand when it came to a showdown over the $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts — aka the sequester — set to automatically kick in on March 1. We got a fair number of responses from Republicans who argued with the premise –insisting that under our logic the GOP should simply capitulate to Obama on all matters due to the fact that the president is the more popular figure with the public at the moment. Tony Fratto, a former Bush Administration spokesman and now a partner at Hamilton Place Strategies

Gingrich: Why Rove and Stevens
are plain wrong
Human Events, by Newt Gingrich     Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/20/2013 9:45:21 AM     Post Reply
I am writing this newsletter in a very direct, no baloney, effort to get across how much trouble we Republicans are in and how real the internal party fight is going to be. I strongly support RNC Chairman Reince Priebus’ effort to think through the lessons of 2012 and develop a better path for the Republican Party. However there are going to be some very powerful opponents to any serious rethinking of Republican doctrines and strategies. It is appalling how little some Republican consultants have learned from the 2012 defeat. It is even more disturbing how arrogant their plans for the future are.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We Are Living in
a Dying Country

92 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 4:53:10 PM     Post Reply
RUSH: Folks, I don´t know how else to categorize this. We are living in a dying country. I don´t know how else to categorize what´s happening -- 88,000 new jobs. The unemployment rate, because of a terrible statistic, is down to 7.6%. The number of people in this country who are not working is shameful. Ninety million Americans are no longer in the workforce. Ninety million. People not in the labor force grew by 663,000, and now 90 million. That´s the labor force participation rate. This is 1979 levels.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
46 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

46 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

Hillary Clinton: The clock is turning
back for women in America

38 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:25:20 PM     Post Reply
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explained to the Women in the World summit in New York today that the clock is turning back for women in America. Clinton praised her own mother for helping empower her to success and marveled at the opportunities that her own daughter Chelsea has pursued. But Clinton warned that there is still so much to do to promote women´s rights in America. "As I look at all these young women that I am privileged to work with, or know through Chelsea, and its hard to imagine turning the clock on them," Clinton said.

White House Blames Jobs
Numbers on Sequester

36 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM     Post Reply
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

34 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Trayvon Martin´s parents
settle wrongful death claim

32 replie(s)
Orlando Sentinel, by Rene Stutzman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:15:25 PM     Post Reply
SANFORD - Trayvon Martin´s parents have settled a wrongful death claim for an amount believed to be more than $1 million against the homeowners association of the Sanford subdivision where their teenage son was killed. Their attorney, Benjamin Crump, filed that paperwork at the Seminole County Courthouse, a portion of which was made public today. In the five pages of the settlement that were available for public review, the settlement amount had been marked out. Lower in the agreement, the parties specified that they would keep that amount confidential. When asked during an earlier interview whether the amount was

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for

Obama Budget to Cap Retirement
Accounts at $3 Million

30 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 9:40:39 PM     Post Reply
The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts. According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals "to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving." "The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per


Post Reply   Close thread 723658





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS