A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Illegal immigrant tells Congress
not to call him illegal

Washington Times, by Stephen Dinan

Original Article

Posted By:drive, 2/13/2013 12:56:50 PM

Jose Antonio Vargas, an illegal immigrant and former reporter, scolded a congressional panel on Wednesday, saying that he should not be called illegal, and saying it is an insult to his family who brought him here. “When you inaccurately call me illegal, you not only dehumanize me, you’re offending them,” he said. “No human being is illegal.” Mr. Vargas testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee alongside Chris Crane — a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent and president of the ICE agents’ union — who is unable to arrest him under the administration’s new non-deportation policies.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Redneck In NY, 2/13/2013 1:02:23 PM     (No. 9174230)

How about tool, pawn, and/or Dem voter?

You can moan about being offended, but it doesn´t change the fact that your breaking the law, therefore illegal fits.


Reply 2 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 2/13/2013 1:07:19 PM     (No. 9174235)

Why do these people get special treatment. Über elites treat them like house trained pets. Sorry, but the rest of us out here in real America pay our taxes, comply with the law. We have no representation in DC.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 2/13/2013 1:07:49 PM     (No. 9174236)

He is right. It would be simpler and more precise to call him a criminal. People who break the law are called lawbreakers, criminals, outlaws, felons etc.

Coming into the country illegally is actually a form of breaking and entering. If the same person broke into and entered a residence or business establishment and were apprehended, they would be arrested and charged with a crime.

This man claims it is an insult to his family to remind people that they broke the law by sneaking into the United States. But since they did break the law by sneaking into the United States, they can, and should, be called criminals. He should count his blessings. Illegal immigrant is actually a euphemism for criminal.


Reply 4 - Posted by: dvc, 2/13/2013 1:12:56 PM     (No. 9174248)

Too bad if you don´t like the facts, you whining Mexican puke. You are here ILLEGALLY and are accurately defined as "an illegal". If you do not like it, GO HOME TO MEXICO, where you are LEGAL.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 2/13/2013 1:13:01 PM     (No. 9174249)

The only criminals are people who have failed to claim membership in some fashionable victim group.

Fat,old,white,male,tea party,veteran taxpayers are all criminals because the world has been divided into oppressors and oppressed.

Very exciting times if you´re a Marxist.


Reply 6 - Posted by: MisterDickens, 2/13/2013 1:18:15 PM     (No. 9174262)

Feigned indignation - a democrat/Marxist/socialist/communist tactic.


Reply 7 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 2/13/2013 1:26:56 PM     (No. 9174280)

Mr. vargas, just shut up. Then consider what happens in mexico to someone who cannot provide adequate documentation. The answer is, they get kicked around first then sent to jail, then summarily deported, as mexico has the toughest immigration laws in this hemisphere.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: roger h. cook,MD, 2/13/2013 1:27:12 PM     (No. 9174282)

"A rose by another name ect.


Reply 9 - Posted by: RayLRiv, 2/13/2013 1:29:41 PM     (No. 9174287)

What would I be called if I tried sneaking into your native country, Mr. Vargas? And how well would I be treated?


Reply 10 - Posted by: lylacat, 2/13/2013 1:35:34 PM     (No. 9174299)

He does not need any stinking laws. Just his being here is against the law; that makes him illegal.


Reply 11 - Posted by: woodsman, 2/13/2013 1:37:21 PM     (No. 9174305)

I would prefer if they called him "deported"


Reply 12 - Posted by: CEP, 2/13/2013 1:39:42 PM     (No. 9174312)

Just call his family, criminal. You break the law you should answer to the law. Deport this big mouth.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Attercliffe, 2/13/2013 1:44:36 PM     (No. 9174326)

FTA:

Mr. Vargas called himself an “undocumented immigrant.”

"Undocumented" means you have no green card or any other legal permission to be here. It means you´re an illegal alien, no matter your age or who brought you.

Yours sincerely,

Attercliffe
Former legal alien/immigrant w/green card
Now naturalized US citizen w/US passport


Reply 14 - Posted by: Freeloader, 2/13/2013 1:50:15 PM     (No. 9174334)

This arrogant fugitive from justice should have been cuffed and lead away on the spot! America is still a Constitutional Republic based on the rule of law, not a Third World Banana Republic based on "The Divine Right Of King Zero." May God Save The Republic!


Reply 15 - Posted by: enemyofthestate, 2/13/2013 1:50:50 PM     (No. 9174338)

Here is the real reason why we are afflicted with propaganda stunts like the Vargas appearance before a congressional panel:

Liberals want to silence all criticism of protected groups, no matter how valid the criticism is. It´s called thought control.


Reply 16 - Posted by: beancounter, 2/13/2013 1:50:58 PM     (No. 9174339)

Actually he´s a whining Filipino puke.

My question to him would be:"Why do you think you should get to immigrate to the United States ahead of all the people who´ve applied to immigrate legally from the Philippines to the United States?"


Reply 17 - Posted by: beancounter, 2/13/2013 1:52:18 PM     (No. 9174341)

I´ll try this if I get pulled over for an illegal left turn:"But officer, it isn´t an illegal left turn. It´s a left turn out of status."


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Whamdbambam, 2/13/2013 1:57:39 PM     (No. 9174352)

OK, let´s try "inmate."


Reply 19 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 2/13/2013 2:05:13 PM     (No. 9174369)

No getting around the fact Mr. Vargas, you are in the country illegally which makes you a criminal. So go away.


Reply 20 - Posted by: klutkz, 2/13/2013 2:07:09 PM     (No. 9174372)

The correct term is "illegal alien".


Reply 21 - Posted by: jgalt, 2/13/2013 2:25:15 PM     (No. 9174404)

The most of putting aspect of this spectacle is the absolute GALL of an ILLEGAL ALIEN to LECTURE our CONGRESS about the proper way to address HIM !!!

The arrogance with which they flaunt our laws is breathtaking !

But then again, the men and women who occupy their respective congressional seats are spineless, feckless cowards and free loaders for the mos part and not really deserving of any respectt. So I guess it´s a wash.


Reply 22 - Posted by: PageTurner, 2/13/2013 2:29:21 PM     (No. 9174413)

The illegal with a grievance complex is from the Philippines. Not surprised, given the wretchedness of that country. Why should anyone listen to him about what he wants to be called? Does he really think we owe it to him to not describe his immigration status as illegal if it is illegal. If he doesn´t like it, let him go back to Philippines, preferably the Manila dump, and make his complaints.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Fireball27, 2/13/2013 2:33:42 PM     (No. 9174423)

Every post I´ve read so far is missing a very important point. These libs keep saying it´s not a big "crime" to enter the country illegally, or overstay a visa. The point I´d like to make is the guy admitted to working, while here as an illegal, and therefore is guilty of either tax evasion, or identity theft, or both. Both are "criminal" offenses, and not just being here illegally. He is an identity thief. Charge him and put him in jail. Will anyone in the media try to find out whose SSN he has been using?


Reply 24 - Posted by: bob913, 2/13/2013 2:35:22 PM     (No. 9174428)

Arrest him!!


Reply 25 - Posted by: dipi, 2/13/2013 2:45:58 PM     (No. 9174444)

"Illegal immigrant tells Congress not to call him illegal"
I have to agree with this individual. Congress should not call him illegal, instead call him a criminal illegal alien.


Reply 26 - Posted by: dolphin, 2/13/2013 3:08:27 PM     (No. 9174475)

I won´t call him an illegal immigrant. I´ll call him what he is: an invader.


Reply 27 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 2/13/2013 3:10:28 PM     (No. 9174482)

That one of these impotent, cowardly Congress wimps had had the nerve to get up in his face and preach the fear of God into this criminal´s face!!!!

This nation died on 11-6-2012. We are just going through our death moans and overall rot and decay now.

Those of us that know this are getting prepared. But those that voted to kill this nation on November 6th are actually going to be shocked when the corpse rots away and they have nothing, and nobody to give them ´´free stuff´´ any more!!!!


Reply 28 - Posted by: Axeman, 2/13/2013 3:24:54 PM     (No. 9174514)

How about the new slang based on their own obscure term? "Undocs". Once a Lofo Undoc, always a Lofo Undoc.


Reply 29 - Posted by: TheGrandWahzoo, 2/13/2013 3:29:17 PM     (No. 9174520)

Shoot him, he´s a spy...


Reply 30 - Posted by: oh-heck, 2/13/2013 3:32:28 PM     (No. 9174531)

Who invited him to the hearing? Why did they invite him to the hearing? Which of you out of work MSM reporters feels like maybe he is working in a job the might have been yours?

The ICE Union was there to protest the fact that they are not allowed to arrest him.


Reply 31 - Posted by: bighambone, 2/13/2013 3:37:39 PM     (No. 9174537)

As #24 above said, just about every illegal alien who now has a US job, and who before getting that job did not have specific permission from the immigration authorities, has most likely committed a federal criminal felony by either falsifying the federal employee verification Form I-9 by using a false identity, some by even falsely claiming to be a US citizen, by listing on that federal form some sort of bogus, counterfeit, or fraudulent US identification documents. If any legitimate US citizen ever did that on any federal form, and was found out, you can safely bet that they would be criminally prosecuted and convicted of a crime.

Today the country is being run by educated idiots (Democrats) who have been able to fool over half of the American public who then voted for them, so what do you expect to happen?


Reply 32 - Posted by: Namma, 2/13/2013 3:37:51 PM     (No. 9174538)

this does show what should happen....the guy should be called a crimminal and thrown in jail..and everyone of those people who hold a congressional office, should be kicked out for even listening to this guy.
They are helping a crimminal...


Reply 33 - Posted by: Penney, 2/13/2013 3:40:20 PM     (No. 9174540)

Ergo, ...breaking U.S. Law by sneaking across this country´s sovereign border is no longer to be, ´´ILLEGAL?!´´ Every country on the planet has Immigration Law protecting their borders, ...but apparently the U.S.A. is now not expected to enforce our´s?!!! ...By the very ILLEGAL aliens themselves?!! What nerve!

As Yakov would say, ´´What a country!´´ (´´Border,´´ STILL mean things!)


Reply 34 - Posted by: 4Justice, 2/13/2013 4:03:24 PM     (No. 9174588)

Stop with the word parsing. You lefties all play the game of word manipulation. You are here illegally--that means you are an illegal alien.


Reply 35 - Posted by: dman, 2/13/2013 4:36:43 PM     (No. 9174650)

Who? If he´s not here legally, he doesn´t exist.


Reply 36 - Posted by: kenecarroll, 2/13/2013 4:37:19 PM     (No. 9174651)

We´re doomed when an illegal can talk to congress like this and get away with it. REMEMBER THE ALAMO
!!!!


Reply 37 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 2/14/2013 1:27:41 AM     (No. 9175317)

How about "Put your hands behind your back. You are under arrest" ? That works for me.


Reply 38 - Posted by: saguni, 2/14/2013 1:15:18 PM     (No. 9176316)

FTA: “No human being is illegal.”

When I was much younger and my son was still a child, I found out the "state" would help me collect my past-due child support---if I applied for AFDC. So I went to the county office to apply. The little twit reading my application said, "It says here you aren´t receiving the child support from his adoptive father, who is his real father?"

I said I had court ordered payments from the adoptive father, she said "We need the real father´s name."

I started to say, "He is illegitimate, I was raped and don´t know the man´s name."

She interrupted at the comma and said, "He is a real child, no child is illegitimate!"

Semantics don´t change the facts, my son was born without a known father and criminal alien invaders are illegal migrants without government permission--in the form of an immigrant visa received before entry--to be in this country.



Post Reply   Close thread 723258




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "drive"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "drive"



The Deafening Silence that
Signals Our Demise
Townhall, by Diana West    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/5/2013 11:56:32 AM     Post Reply
Get ready for the last straw. First, though, I´d like to suggest that anyone reading this column in a local newspaper or news site pat the editor on the back for publishing what in our neo-medieval world of fear amounts to a forbidden column. Yup, I am about to say something about the Great Barack Obama Identity/Eligibility Scandal again. I know that this is one rich and urgent topic that doesn´t see the light of day in certain so-called news outlets -- and I say that from the experience of watching my own syndicated columns

9/11 Remains Still Found,
and Still Sought
New York Times, by Jim Dwyer    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/5/2013 9:48:01 AM     Post Reply
You could hear the deep breath, the pause before a conversational plunge. On the phone were Monica Gabrielle and Kristen Breitweiser. Their husbands died at the World Trade Center in the Sept. 11 attack. This week, a new effort to find remains from the site uncovered 39 pieces of what appeared to be human bones. That was the yield from the first three days of work in a process that is expected to go on for at least two months.

Obama Budget to Include Cuts
to Programs in Hopes of Deal
New York Times, by Jackie Calmes    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/5/2013 9:00:00 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — President Obama next week will take the political risk of formally proposing cuts to Social Security and Medicare in his annual budget in an effort to demonstrate his willingness to compromise with Republicans and revive prospects for a long-term deficit-reduction deal, administration officials say. In a significant shift in fiscal strategy, Mr. Obama on Wednesday will send a budget plan to Capitol Hill that departs from the usual presidential wish list that Republicans typically declare dead on arrival.

Obama´s Gambit Raises Pressure
on Boehner, Edges Washington
Toward Budget Deal
National Journal, by Ron Fournier    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/5/2013 8:29:33 AM     Post Reply
Washington is edging closer to a budget deal, thanks to a gutsy change in strategy at the White House. Next week, President Obama will propose specific cuts to Social Security and Medicare in his annual budget, according to senior White House officials. That will put the onus on House Speaker John Boehner to show some leadership, too. He needs to push Republicans toward accepting tax increases beyond the $600 billion approved in December. It can be done. As I reported last month, Washington’s biggest myth is that a budget deal is out of reach

Do North Korea’s threats mask
power struggle behind the scenes?
McClatchy News, by Matthew Schofield and Tom Lasseter    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/4/2013 8:08:25 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — The North Korean army warned the United States on Wednesday it has been cleared to wage nuclear war using “smaller, lighter and diversified weapons.” In a speech earlier in the day, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel noted that North Korea has both the nuclear weapons and the delivery system “now.” It’s the latest round in an escalation of rhetoric and actions that began with a North Korean nuclear test in February. Still, military officials and experts don’t expect North Korea to launch an attack on the United States.

What´s really happening
in North Korea?
Politico, by Dylan Byers    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/3/2013 3:29:42 PM     Post Reply
Two breaking news alerts came through the wire this afternoon: First, the AP sent word that Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel has called North Korea´s latest rhetoric a real, clear danger and threat to the U.S. and its allies. Within minutes, CNBC announced that the Pentagon has sent a new missile defense to Guam. The reports that followed those alerts added some meat to the storty -- "Hagel´s comments come as tensions continue to rise between North and South Korea," etc. -- but they are notably lacking in context. How serious is the threat, really? Are the North and South on the verge of war, or is this yet another bluff?

Menendez allies now accusing
FBI of kidnapping, harassment
Daily Caller, by Charles C. Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/3/2013 3:26:29 PM     Post Reply
In a bizarre new twist to the saga of Sen. Bob Menendez and his donor-friend Salomon Melgen, members of Melgen’s circle are now hurling accusations at FBI agents investigating the pair’s relationship. During an appearance on the weekly Dominican TV show La Respuesta last week, Melgen’s uncle Vincho Castillo accused the FBI of threatening and kidnapping two of Melgen’s maids. In addition to being the Dominican Republic’s top drug cop and founder of a far right-wing political party, Vincho Castillo is also the father of Vinicito Castillo, a lawyer who allegedly participated in sex parties organized by Melgen.

From Lincoln to Obama,
Presidents as Propagandists
National Journal, by Ron Fournier    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/2/2013 3:47:21 PM     Post Reply
My nephew’s high school government class is studying propaganda, a word most students associated with Hitler, Goebbels, and the like. “I deal with propagandists every day,” I told the class in the Detroit area last week. “They work in the White House and in Congress--Republicans and Democrats alike.” The kids were a bit surprised. “Are you calling them Nazis?” one asked. Of course not, I replied, but politicians today are using new communications tools to spread their version of the truth, much of it misleading. A smart piece by Nancy Benac of the Associated Press describes how the Obama White House “image machine” works--“serving up a stream of words, images, and videos that invariably cast the president as commanding, compassionate, and on the ball.

Will Obama’s Majority Survive?
New York Magazine, by Jonathan Chait    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/1/2013 3:11:18 PM     Post Reply
Since November, the prospective death of the Republican coalition has hovered over American politics, and the autopsy has gained renewed attention in light of the debates over gay marriage and immigration, both of which split the GOP from rising chunks of the electorate. I’m an advocate of the theory, first put forward a decade ago by Ruy Teixeira and John Judis, that the electorate is forming a natural Democratic majority. The Republican Party appears to be caught in a double bind, in which the electorate is growingly progressively less white, and even younger white voters hold less conservative views than older ones. What’s more, evidence suggests that voters maintain the partisan allegiances they form at a young age. The picture looks grim for the GOP.

West Wing Spared From
Sequester Cuts, So Far
Roll Call, by Steven T. Dennis    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/1/2013 3:06:32 PM     Post Reply
The sequester doesn’t appear to have hit the West Wing of the White House particularly hard. Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters — after more than a month of dodging questions on White House effects — that 480 employees of the White House Office of Management and Budget have received furlough notices. Even that tidbit is weeks old. After Congress let the March 1 deadline pass without replacing automatic across-the-board spending cuts, executive branch agencies have been scrambling to cut their budgets and furlough employees.

A-Rod shows at Yankee Stadium,
not worried about drug probe
New York Post, by Dan Martin    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/1/2013 2:42:40 PM     Post Reply
Alex Rodriguez said Monday he’s not worried about a potential suspension regarding his ties to performance enhancing drugs and still intends to play for the Yankees this season.“No, I’m not,” Rodriguez said when asked if he was concerned about being targeted by MLB or a possible suspension. “But I’m not gonna further discuss this. At some point, I feel that everything will be good.”That point has not arrived. The third baseman acknowledged meeting with the league about their investigation into Biogenesis, the anti-aging clinic whose records contained Rodriguez’s name. He declined to go into details, though.

Betraying one of the
CIA’s ‘Band of Sisters’?
Washington Post, by Marc A. Thiessen    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/1/2013 2:20:59 PM     Post Reply
Former CIA director Mike Hayden credits “an incredible band of sisters” for the success of the operation that found and brought down Osama bin Laden. Now one of those sisters has been appointed acting chief of the CIA’s National Clandestine service. It is a major milestone for women at the CIA, the first time in the agency’s history that a female officer has headed the clandestine service. But The Post reports that CIA Director John Brennan is “hesitating” at giving her the position on a permanent basis, because of her past association with the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation (RDI) program. This is an outrage. According to several former senior CIA officials I spoke with, the officer is highly respected and unquestionably qualified for this post.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We Are Living in
a Dying Country

92 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 4:53:10 PM     Post Reply
RUSH: Folks, I don´t know how else to categorize this. We are living in a dying country. I don´t know how else to categorize what´s happening -- 88,000 new jobs. The unemployment rate, because of a terrible statistic, is down to 7.6%. The number of people in this country who are not working is shameful. Ninety million Americans are no longer in the workforce. Ninety million. People not in the labor force grew by 663,000, and now 90 million. That´s the labor force participation rate. This is 1979 levels.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

40 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Hillary Clinton: The clock is turning
back for women in America

38 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:25:20 PM     Post Reply
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explained to the Women in the World summit in New York today that the clock is turning back for women in America. Clinton praised her own mother for helping empower her to success and marveled at the opportunities that her own daughter Chelsea has pursued. But Clinton warned that there is still so much to do to promote women´s rights in America. "As I look at all these young women that I am privileged to work with, or know through Chelsea, and its hard to imagine turning the clock on them," Clinton said.

White House Blames Jobs
Numbers on Sequester

36 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM     Post Reply
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look

The Deafening Silence that
Signals Our Demise

35 replie(s)
Townhall, by Diana West    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/5/2013 11:56:32 AM     Post Reply
Get ready for the last straw. First, though, I´d like to suggest that anyone reading this column in a local newspaper or news site pat the editor on the back for publishing what in our neo-medieval world of fear amounts to a forbidden column. Yup, I am about to say something about the Great Barack Obama Identity/Eligibility Scandal again. I know that this is one rich and urgent topic that doesn´t see the light of day in certain so-called news outlets -- and I say that from the experience of watching my own syndicated columns

We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
34 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

Trayvon Martin´s parents
settle wrongful death claim

32 replie(s)
Orlando Sentinel, by Rene Stutzman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:15:25 PM     Post Reply
SANFORD - Trayvon Martin´s parents have settled a wrongful death claim for an amount believed to be more than $1 million against the homeowners association of the Sanford subdivision where their teenage son was killed. Their attorney, Benjamin Crump, filed that paperwork at the Seminole County Courthouse, a portion of which was made public today. In the five pages of the settlement that were available for public review, the settlement amount had been marked out. Lower in the agreement, the parties specified that they would keep that amount confidential. When asked during an earlier interview whether the amount was

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for

Obama Budget to Cap Retirement
Accounts at $3 Million

30 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 9:40:39 PM     Post Reply
The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts. According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals "to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving." "The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per


Post Reply   Close thread 723258





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS