A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Background checks represent
ground for compromise
on gun control

Washington Times, by David Sherfinski

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 2/10/2013 10:22:57 PM

Out of the flurry of ambitious gun control proposals in the wake of December’s school shooting in Connecticut, expanded background checks on gun sales are fast emerging as the “sweet spot” — as one Senate Democratic leader put it — between what gun control advocates seek and what can actually attract bipartisan support in Congress. Discussion of bans on so-called assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines have gradually given way to the more politically palatable ideas of strengthening the federal background check system or instituting near-universal background checks for gun buyers — even as proponents and opponents clash bitterly

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: jimK1, 2/10/2013 10:30:10 PM     (No. 9169434)

Give an inch and the sorry SOB´s will take a mile.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: M Stuart, 2/10/2013 10:43:33 PM     (No. 9169448)

Just say NO!



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: wrytaway, 2/10/2013 10:46:14 PM     (No. 9169451)

Background checks are just another way of "registering" guns. "Who are you? Where do you live? What´s your history? What kind of gun are we talking about."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: veritas, 2/10/2013 11:02:27 PM     (No. 9169466)

No!

1. A complete camel comes attached to that nose. Always will.

2. "Shall not be infringed" means "shall not be infringed." If the LAPD can shoot up two small Asian women when they´re searching for one very large black man, and gov´t [even when trying to get something right, and G-d knows a background check system would draw mischief like honey] makes more mistakes than Clouseau, the idea is totally nuts.

3. So there are no cases of nut-jobs ever using anything but a gun, anywhere in the world, in all of history? So keeping nuts from guns, period, re-opens Eden to us?

4. IF put in place, crime with stolen guns will go from whatever % to 100%. That´s a stark raving brilliant "solution!"

5. How often are cars used in connection with murders? Every one of them is registered.

There´s one problem to be addressed -- the evil in the heart of the perp. I could scream!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: texaspast, 2/10/2013 11:04:45 PM     (No. 9169471)

No. This is backdoor registration, pure and simple. They shouldn´t even be collecting data on the type of gun being purchased if the only purpose is a ´background check.´ But checking the background is not really the purpose, is it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Dixie, 2/10/2013 11:16:03 PM     (No. 9169480)

Would there be a stipulation that NO MATTER WHAT the "background check" reveals, the gun will still be sold to the purchaser?

I think not.

That means that the Right to Bear Arms is "infringed".

Besides, what criminal in his/her right mind would buy a gun and submit to a background check? They don´t do it now, and they won´t in the future. They´ll just steal them from homes where they think there are guns and they will break in to steal them when the owners are gone.
Or buy them on the Black Market.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: TruthAndJustice, 2/10/2013 11:34:00 PM     (No. 9169491)

NO...why so they can come to ones home and intimidate one at a time NO...It´s UNCONSTITUTIONAL..NO

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: NYbob, 2/10/2013 11:49:36 PM     (No. 9169499)

#3, tell it to Andrew Cuomo. This state has had every liberal gun control law and then some, but that wasn´t enough for the grandstanding Gov. He has to double down on ways to disarm residents who have obeyed every NY law. You wonder why law abiding citizens are fed up with two faced liars, look at the democrats in this state. They are the living example of when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Lonestar Jack, 2/11/2013 12:19:16 AM     (No. 9169517)

How about a background check for Obama and all his cohorts in Congress, and at least 8 hours of Constitution study which they swear to uphold.
I had to pay $80 and spend a day in class to get a CHL.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: oh-heck, 2/11/2013 12:21:49 AM     (No. 9169519)

Go back to the conversation between Schumer and LaPierre. What LaPierre was saying is that if you have a law precluding those who have committed violent crimes or been under involuntary psychiatric from gun ownership, you should have a register of those individuals. Gun buyers can be checked against that list. The problem with liberals is they avidly protect the privacy of violent criminals and those with past psychiatric problems but are eager as hell to a force and publish background checks on gun buyers.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Mr. Hanky, 2/11/2013 1:14:12 AM     (No. 9169527)

Nothing to address the root of the problem.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: flatwater, 2/11/2013 1:19:43 AM     (No. 9169529)

So, criminals and felons have agreed to submit to background checks?

How stupid are our GOP representatives?

How about we tie background checks and photo ID to voter registrations, as well?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: flatwater, 2/11/2013 1:21:27 AM     (No. 9169530)

#3,

Your friends at Daily Kos, Democratic Underground and Communist Party USA miss you terribly. Feel free to hurry back and join them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Spidey, 2/11/2013 1:56:11 AM     (No. 9169542)

One of the things missing from this conversation is the evolution of the revenge factor being generated by leftists.I´ll bet most inner city shootings have a revenge motive behind them.

A seemingly normal young woman in NY committed suicide last week because her circle of idiot friends on Facebook bullied her.So she goes out and jumps off a bridge to get even and isn´t around to see the results.In fact there´s been quite a few people who killed themselves over Facebook bullying.Where´s the new laws banning bullying from social websites?

The morons rooting for the cop killer are an emerging bunch of anti-social psychos.We know this guy´s motivation is revenge because he said so,maybe that´s why the left supports him.

I wouldn´t want to be in the business of hiring and firing anymore. If you fire someone,they´ll blame you,not themselves.This happened a couple years ago when a beer distributor fired a driver for stealing.He came back and shot the place up.That gas gun free zone Conn.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: chumley, 2/11/2013 2:37:44 AM     (No. 9169549)

Why is it that compromise with communists always means they get something and I lose something?
That is not compromise. It is tyranny.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: PChristopher, 2/11/2013 2:40:29 AM     (No. 9169550)

If any of you so-called Republicans give so much as an inch on any of this you will not be in office in ´14.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 17 - Posted by: gator, 2/11/2013 3:05:28 AM     (No. 9169554)

The naiveté of people like 3 is half the problem. It isn’t the checks that bother folks so much as it is the record retention that will be available to any government agency that wants them. You will have been registered and then vulnerable to whatever pressure the G-men want to put on you including confiscation, fines, and imprisonment. And of course as has been pointed out, criminals, or the crazies that are planning something, could not care less, as it would only effect law abiding citizens. This is a compromise that we cannot allow to happen.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: typhoon, 2/11/2013 8:33:21 AM     (No. 9169813)

Not only no, but hell no.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: southernboy, 2/11/2013 9:20:58 AM     (No. 9169890)

Remember the plaintive cry of the leftist, bleeding heart liberal as he writes one more law restricting everyones´ freedom:

“ If it saves the life of just one child, it will be worth it!”

The same liberal who, on his day off, will be marching at a abortion rights rally.






  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 20 - Posted by: JustCause, 2/11/2013 1:23:59 PM     (No. 9170328)

Background checks represent the foot in the door for changing the qualifications to allow the purchase

AND

even though the law states the background check information shall be deleted within 48 hours of the completed check - it won´t be.

Information is Power
Hillary lost in 08 because her FBI files didn´t include Obama - they were out of date and he was too New.
Information is Power

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 722908




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Palin on Sebelius Replacement Sylvia
Burwell: ´You Can´t Make This Stuff Up´
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/12/2014 5:03:32 PM     Post Reply
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin blasted President Barack Obama for nominating as his new Health and Human Services Secretary the same woman who ordered the shutdown of the war memorials during the so-called government shutdown last year. After accepting Kathleen Sebelius´ resignation Friday, Obama nominated Sylvia Burwell, the former Office of Management and Budget director. This is the same person who sent the email initiating the barricading of the memorials, even as veterans were arriving in D.C. on their "honor flights" to see the memorials that they built. Palin, along with Sens. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Mike Lee

   

 



 
The five extra words that can
fix the Second Amendment
Washington Post, by John Paul Stevens    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/11/2014 10:35:30 PM     Post Reply
Following the massacre of grammar-school children in Newtown, Conn., in December 2012, high-powered weapons have been used to kill innocent victims in more senseless public incidents. Those killings, however, are only a fragment of the total harm caused by the misuse of firearms. Each year, more than 30,000 people die in the United States in firearm-related incidents. Many of those deaths involve handguns. The adoption of rules that will lessen the number of those incidents should be a matter of primary concern to both federal and state legislators. Legislatures are in a far better position than judges to assess the

U.S. blocks Iran’s pick as envoy to
U.N., setting up new confrontation
Washington Post, by Anne Gearan    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/11/2014 10:32:08 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration said Friday that it would block Iran’s nominee as ambassador to the United Nations from entering the United States, setting up a new confrontation with Tehran just as relations with the Islamic republic appeared to be improving. The decision to bar entry to the diplomat, who was allegedly involved in the 1979 seizure of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, followed intense political pressure on the administration from Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill. But it also marked a rare instance in which Washington has effectively vetoed another country’s preferred choice as envoy to the United Nations. Iran

Distressed homeowners seeking
mortgage relief could get
stuck with a big tax bill
Washington Post, by Dina ElBoghdady    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/11/2014 10:28:52 PM     Post Reply
Struggling homeowners across the country could face significant new tax bills if they receive mortgage relief from their banks, a prospect that threatens to slow the housing recovery and put further strain on distressed borrowers. The collapse of the housing market and plunging home prices left millions of people stuck owing more on their mortgages than their homes were worth. Some have worked with their banks to reduce the loan amount to avoid foreclosure or enable a sale. In 2007, Congress adopted a law that spared those homeowners from being taxed on the amount of the loan that was forgiven. But

11 Sebelius Supporters with
Egg on Their Faces Today
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/11/2014 8:43:12 PM     Post Reply
On Thursday, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius resigned her position. The New York Times reported the resignation as a punishment for failure: Officials said Ms. Sebelius, 65, made the decision to resign and was not forced out. But the frustration at the White House over her performance had become increasingly clear, as administration aides worried that the crippling problems at HealthCare.gov, the website set up to enroll Americans in insurance exchanges, would result in lasting damage to the president’s legacy. So Sebelius stuck around just long enough to reach the mythical 7 million enrollment number

Contempt and the IRS
National Review Online, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/11/2014 7:37:05 AM     Post Reply
The House Oversight Committee has voted to hold former IRS subpotentate Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress, while the House Ways and Means Committee has referred her case to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution. The facts in the case suggest very strongly that Ms. Lerner has earned the contempt of the American people as well as criminal prosecution to the full extent of the law. The question of whether Justice will do justice now rests with the Obama administration, in service to which Ms. Lerner organized and oversaw the repression of nonprofit activists under color of IRS authority. That

A Criminal Organization Masquerading
As… Oh, You Know the Rest
PJ Media, by Michael Walsh    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/10/2014 10:25:12 PM     Post Reply
Another day, another chronicle of Democratic Party malfeasance. Enjoy: In Congress, Rep. Darrell Issa of California has just leveled an explosive charge against his Democrat counterpart on the House Oversight and Government Reform committee — to wit, that the gentleman from Maryland colluded with the IRS to harass a conservative organization fighting for honest elections: Issa said records obtained last week from the IRS show communications from the office of ranking member Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., about True the Vote, a Texas-based, non-profit conservative group that aims to prevent voter fraud.The communications at one point involved Lois Lerner, the ex-IRS

Kathleen Sebelius resigning after
botched Obamacare rollout
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr. and Dave Boyer    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/10/2014 10:21:10 PM     Post Reply
With the rocky rollout of his health care law in a post-deadline lull, President Obama will move this week to shake up his health care team, accepting the resignation of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and tapping his budget director as a troubleshooting replacement, the White House confirmed Thursday. Mrs. Sebelius, a former Kansas governor who has served as HHS secretary for Mr. Obama’s entire tenure, was the president’s point person as his signature law stumbled out of the blocks in October. Despite calls for her to be fired, Mrs. Sebelius stayed on the job to oversee a

Social Security, Treasury
target taxpayers for their
parents’ decades-old debts
Washington Post, by Marc Fisher    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/10/2014 10:14:13 PM     Post Reply
A few weeks ago, with no notice, the U.S. government intercepted Mary Grice’s tax refunds from both the IRS and the state of Maryland. Grice had no idea that Uncle Sam had seized her money until some days later, when she got a letter saying that her refund had gone to satisfy an old debt to the government — a very old debt. When Grice was 4, back in 1960, her father died, leaving her mother with five children to raise. Until the kids turned 18, Sadie Grice got survivor benefits from Social Security to help feed and clothe them.

Thought police on patrol
Washington Post, by Charles Krauthammer    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/10/2014 10:10:00 PM     Post Reply
Two months ago, a petition bearing more than 110,000 signatures was delivered to The Post, demanding a ban on any article questioning global warming. The petition arrived the day before publication of my column, which consisted of precisely that heresy. The column ran as usual. But I was gratified by the show of intolerance because it perfectly illustrated my argument that the left is entering a new phase of ideological agitation — no longer trying to win the debate but stopping debate altogether, banishing from public discourse any and all opposition. The proper word for that attitude is totalitarian. It

A Divisive Attorney General
National Review Online, by Victor Davis Hanson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/10/2014 9:52:38 PM     Post Reply
Attorney General Eric Holder must be suffering from a sort of amnesia. He is upset at supposed divisiveness and rudeness directed at him when testifying before Congress, and suggests not too subtly that he and President Obama have been accorded inordinately harsh treatment (fill in the blanks why). Aside from the fact that he seemed to have relished the combat with Representative Gohmert in quite unprofessional tones (“you don’t want to go there, buddy, alright?”/ “good luck with your asparagus”), he seems to forget what former attorney general Alberto Gonzales once endured both in the liberal media and before Democrats

The Shame of Brandeis
Commentary Magazine, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/9/2014 8:32:37 PM     Post Reply
If you have not yet heard, Brandeis University has rescinded its offer of an honorary degree to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the Somali-born activist whose work has focused on the barbaric misogyny rampant in Islamic societies like the one in which she was raised—and whose efforts to call attention to them as a legislator in the Netherlands led to a political crisis there and her eventual flight to the United States. Given that it only takes a Google search to find out everything one would need to know about her, including the controversial aspects of her views, it is disgustingly laughable



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Meet the Clinton shoe-thrower
65 replie(s)
NBC Universal, by Emma Margolin    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 4/12/2014 5:03:17 PM     Post Reply
Who throws a shoe? Honestly! That would be 36-year-old Alison Ernst of Phoenix, Arizona, who was charged Thursday night with disorderly conduct by the Las Vegas Police Department after allegedly throwing a shoe at former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. According to NBC News, who spoke with a Secret Service official, the U.S. Attorney’s office has declined federal prosecution. Ernst was wearing shoes on Thursday night when she attended a speech Clinton was giving in Las Vegas, but apparently brought an extra one specifically to throw at the former secretary of state. The official said the incident appeared to be “premeditated.”

Bundy Ranch, the Federal Government,
and the Nevada Water Tipping Point

61 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Monica Morrill    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 4/12/2014 7:29:42 AM     Post Reply
Many Americans have been watching with great consternation the ongoing struggle between the Federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Marshals against Cliven Bundy and his family. There are no signs of either side relinquishing their position. Many onlookers have been informed that this dispute is over protecting the desert tortoise. But it is nothing of the sort. In fact, the reality of the dispute goes far underneath what is being talked about. The more appropriate source of the dispute is ground water as well as surface water -- this is a war over water. Cliven Bundy and his

The five extra words that can
fix the Second Amendment

44 replie(s)
Washington Post, by John Paul Stevens    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/11/2014 10:35:30 PM     Post Reply
Following the massacre of grammar-school children in Newtown, Conn., in December 2012, high-powered weapons have been used to kill innocent victims in more senseless public incidents. Those killings, however, are only a fragment of the total harm caused by the misuse of firearms. Each year, more than 30,000 people die in the United States in firearm-related incidents. Many of those deaths involve handguns. The adoption of rules that will lessen the number of those incidents should be a matter of primary concern to both federal and state legislators. Legislatures are in a far better position than judges to assess the

Nevada Cattle Rancher Wins
´Range War´ With Feds

42 replie(s)
ABC News, by Liz Fields    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/12/2014 3:33:27 PM     Post Reply
A Nevada cattle rancher appears to have won his week-long battle with the federal government over a controversial cattle roundup that had led to the arrest of several protesters. Cliven Bundy went head to head with the Bureau of Land Management over the removal of hundreds of his cattle from federal land, where the government said they were grazing illegally. Bundy claims his herd of roughly 900 cattle have grazed on the land along the riverbed near Bunkerville, 80 miles northeast of Las Vegas, since 1870 and threatened a "range war" against the BLM on the Bundy Ranch website after one of

Barbara Boxer Says Keystone
Pipeline a Cancer Risk

37 replie(s)
Breitbart California, by William Bigelow    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/12/2014 6:54:45 PM     Post Reply
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) is now accusing the Keystone pipeline of being a cancer risk. Her first point was that the pipeline “will bring 830,000 barrels of dirty tar sands oil into our nation every day.” She then segued to point #2 by asserting that the heavy tar sands oil will put people who live near refineries at risk for cancer: Significantly higher levels of dangerous air pollutants and carcinogens have been documented downwind from tar sands refineries, and in these areas people are suffering higher rates of the types of cancers linked to these toxic chemicals, including leukemia and

Sunk: Climate change threatens to
flood world´s largest Navy base
warns Gov. Terry McAuliffe

34 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/11/2014 4:08:01 PM     Post Reply
Recently elected Democratic Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe is warning that global warming could raise sea levels high enough to flood the Hampton Roads region, home to the world´s largest naval base, without immediate and “smart decisions.” Addressing an environmental summit this week at the Virginia Military Institute in Lexington, Va., McAuliffe embraced climate change, blamed humans for causing it, and said action is needed now to protect Virginia´s coast from rising ocean levels that will result from global warming. “The first big decision of course is to accept that climate change is real,” he told the group. “I happen to believe in

President Obama stands by Rev. Al Sharpton
while accusing Republicans of trying
to restrict the right to vote

33 replie(s)
New York Daily News, by Celeste Katz & Annie Karni    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 4/12/2014 7:02:39 AM     Post Reply
President Obama stood Friday with the Rev. Al Sharpton and accused Republicans of trying to keep millions of Americans from voting, in a fiery speech days after new revelations about Sharpton’s past as an FBI informant. “The right to vote is threatened today in a way that it has not been since the Voting Rights Act became law nearly five decades ago,” Obama told the annual convention of Sharpton’s National Action Network in Manhattan. Obama’s appearance represented a presidential seal of approval of Sharpton’s role as a civil rights activist, amid the new revelations about how Sharpton used a wire to record

White House Denies ’09 Fort Hood Victim´s
Request for Meeting With Obama

29 replie(s)
ABC News, by Lee Ferran    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/11/2014 6:08:03 PM     Post Reply
As President Obama spoke of old "wounds” at Fort Hood this week, the White House declined a request from a survivor of the 2009 massacre there to meet with Obama for a few minutes so the veteran could explain face-to-face how he believes the government has mistreated and disrespected the victims of that attack. Staff Sgt. Alonzo Lunsford (ret.) was shot seven times in November 2009 when Army psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Hasan opened fire at Fort Hood, killing 13 people. Despite Hasan’s admission that he carried out the attack on behalf of the Taliban and revelations that he had been

Goodbye tea party, hello big tent
27 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/13/2014 5:08:01 AM     Post Reply
Say what you will about Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), but they know a train wreck when they see it. They also know when to separate themselves from the cranks and the losers on the right. Although both supported the shutdown and were heartily supported by tea party groups in their own Senate races, neither one has endorsed Matt Bevin in Kentucky, Milton Wolf in Kansas or Chris McDaniel in Mississippi. In fact, Cruz’s office confirms he hasn’t endorsed anyone in the primaries. He may weigh in after the primaries. Rand Paul has endorsed two very establishment

Why The Feds Chickened Out
On A Nevada Ranch

26 replie(s)
Townhall, by Kevin McCullough    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/13/2014 11:55:18 AM     Post Reply
Let me obliterate a bit of confusion here: the Obama administration attempted to go to war with a rancher in Nevada. Let me amplify a little bit of truth: They tucked tail and have returned home. And let me add a bit of clarity: they had no choice! As the nation began to become familiar with the plight of the family of Cliven Bundy, many of us harkened back to another standoff in which the Federal government attempted to bully it´s outcome: Waco, Texas and the Branch Davidian massacre. It is telling that in the Nevada case the feds pulled out so

Obama decries ‘bogus’
voter fraud complaints

24 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Justin Sink    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/11/2014 8:18:44 PM     Post Reply
President Obama labeled complaints about voter fraud “bogus” and accused Republicans of cynically trying to prevent Americans from accessing the polls in a fiery speech Friday at a civil rights forum hosted by Al Sharpton. Obama argued that attempts in some states to impose new voter identification restrictions were actually efforts by Republicans to make “it harder, not easier to vote.” And the president said that while voter fraud should be prevented, it rarely occurred. “So let´s be clear, the real voter fraud is the people who try to deny our rights by making bogus arguments about voter fraud,” Obama said. Obama

Victory for Nevada´s last rancher!
Federal government backs down and
says it will NOT try to seize cattle from
cowboy at the centre of armed showdown

23 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Ryan Gorman*    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/12/2014 2:34:02 PM     Post Reply
The last rancher in southern Nevada has won his battle to graze cows on public land after a week-long stand off with federal agents. The Bureau of Land Management today said it would stop trying to seize the cattle of Cliven Bundy after armed militia members today continuing to gather in Nevada in a confrontation with federal agents. BLM Director Neil Kornze said: ´Based on information about conditions on the ground, and in consultation with law enforcement, we have made a decision to conclude the cattle gather because of our serious concern about the safety of employees and members of

   

Post Reply   Close thread 722908





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS