A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


NRA: Why ´universal´
checks won´t work

USA Today, by Wayne LaPierre

Original Article

Posted By:afortiori, 2/10/2013 6:28:20 PM

It seems so reasonable. In the minds of many, "universal background checks" for firearms transactions sounds like a good idea. But is it really? No. No idea is good if it doesn´t work. No legislation is reasonable if it fails to accomplish its purported goal — to prevent violent criminals and the mentally ill from acquiring firearms. Criminals won´t participate in a "universal" system. They´ll always steal or get their guns, and everything else they want, on the black market. Reasonable people know that criminals will never be part of the "universe."

Comments:
But Wayne??? Don´t you understand? In a liberal´s mind, if something doesn´t work, that just means you have to do more of it!!!

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Mr. Know-It-All, 2/10/2013 7:00:24 PM     (No. 9169243)

Will it work? Not likely. It is pretty much unenforceable, unless you want to divert scarce resources and have BATFE agents conducting stings to snare a few mostly law abiding citizens who decide they don´t want to be bothered with yet another layer of bureaucratic hassle in their lives. Effect on crime rates will essentially be zero. Criminals will still get their guns.

The gun grabbers know this. This is just another incremental step to the ultimate goal of a total ban and confiscation. When this doesn´t work it will on to the next "common sense" level.

The libs make such a big deal out of the
"gun show loophole" which is just private citizens engaging in legal commerce. Few criminals get their guns this way, despite what the bed-wetters think.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 2/10/2013 7:02:10 PM     (No. 9169245)

The expression "slippery slope" is a cliche. Liberals love to use it to dismiss 2nd Amemdment advocates as paranoid. Second Amendment advocates don´t trust big government and have legitamate concerns about the incremental confiscation of individual liberties. Democrats don´t care about safety. Their objective is control. Universal registeati

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 2/10/2013 7:05:04 PM     (No. 9169247)

Sorry. Universal registration always precedes confiscation. Oh, darn it . My paranoia is way out of control.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: bluefindad, 2/10/2013 7:06:57 PM     (No. 9169250)

Mexico has gone much, much further - an average, law-abiding citizen cannot own a gun. Period.

Please tell me - how has that worked to reduce the number of citizens gunned down annually in Mexico?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: flatwater, 2/10/2013 7:07:02 PM     (No. 9169251)

Why don´t we have "universal background checks" for voter registration?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Justavoter, 2/10/2013 7:07:02 PM     (No. 9169252)

The minute universal background checks start is the minute burglaries skyrocket.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Captain Howdy, 2/10/2013 7:10:20 PM     (No. 9169254)

Although I am against universal background checks and I´d like to see the imaginary 40% number rebutted, do you think they would go for a system that was absolutely free of charge, no serial numbers or type or number of weapons involved, just a yes or no to whether a sale was allowed? Just a "proceed" or "deny" that would be appealable if you were denied?
Just a common sense, reasonable background check? I´m sure it wouldn´t fly without the database aspect.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: kane toad, 2/10/2013 7:14:32 PM     (No. 9169256)

#6, like the voter registration background checks!
Rabbit, it sounds like you are on the wrong site. A little more respect for Mr Lapierre please.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: southernboy, 2/10/2013 7:16:39 PM     (No. 9169258)

#1 So you acknowledge that ‘bad guys’ will circumvent the system, the ´mentally ill’ may not be on the ‘do not sell’ list…but you think the so-called ‘loop-hole’ should be closed anyway.
It’s just another way for the government to log the ownership of weapons. (It’s called ‘registration.’ The first step toward confiscation.) Once this ‘loophole’ is closed,(surprise!) registration will require model and S/N, name and address of the seller and the buyer. Once the owner and location of the weapon is known it’s a simple task to require it to be turned in.

The truth is the government never will be able to control private sales of guns between individuals, no matter how many laws it passes. And the politicians with a lick of sense know it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 2/10/2013 7:30:52 PM     (No. 9169277)

You will be needing a lathe and a mill and internet access.

Why buy guns when you can build them ?

Why buy ammo ?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Bpl40, 2/10/2013 7:33:36 PM     (No. 9169280)

This regime has no power to disarm the criminals. So they want to use the coercive power of the State to disarm their victims? Wonderful!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: cjjeepercreeper, 2/10/2013 7:42:22 PM     (No. 9169289)

#4 nailed it. The first thing I thought when this subject was even brought up days or weeks ago, whenever that was.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: texaspast, 2/10/2013 7:47:19 PM     (No. 9169295)

Background check without telling what kind of gun is being purchased, that would be better. The whole point is to be able to track every gun in every hand so that when time comes to take them all, they know where to go. And BTW - rabbit is one of those 35,000 ´operatives´ OFA has been lining up.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 2/10/2013 7:49:13 PM     (No. 9169296)

As reported on the Michael Brown show on KOAA (850 AM, Denver), he has been waiting three weeks now for a background check to be completed.

Gov ChickenPooper now want´s to charge for background checks.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: flatwater, 2/10/2013 8:01:26 PM     (No. 9169304)

#1,

Whatever the White House is paying you to troll here, it´s way too much.

Please go back to your Daily Kos, or Democratic Underground or Communist Party USA, where you belong.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: TunnelRat, 2/10/2013 8:29:12 PM     (No. 9169328)

Unless, of course, the real object of the legislation is simply to make criminals out of honest people...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: hopeandglory, 2/10/2013 9:11:57 PM     (No. 9169379)

Don´t read the Bunny Droppings . . . it just encourages more turds.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: pearlyjo, 2/10/2013 9:14:00 PM     (No. 9169383)

The old liberal mantra: "Better a thousand guilty men go free than one innocent man be condemned."
Today it´s a scorched earth approach: everyone will be punished because a few cannot be trusted.
Kinda takes you back to third grade when one of your fellow students broke a window in the bathroom. Unless someone fessed up, you all got punished and remained inside for recess.
We have Nanny Bloomberg and Sister Mary Obama as our leaders.
News flash to the troll: felons don´t need to buy guns at gunshows, they can steal them, borrow them from other felons or buy them off of the street. Background checks mean nothing to them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: NYbob, 2/11/2013 12:03:22 AM     (No. 9169509)

#1, you mean the kind of ´background checks´ that the AZ gun dealer got from the DOJ? The check that ordered him to sell high cap weapons to gang members. What ever happened to EVERY person involved in that Fast and Furious operation? I find it repulsive that the same players in government who did something so obviously illegal, are now attempting to decide by fiat which Americans can defend themselves and what they can do with their property. Defend THAT.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Spidey, 2/11/2013 6:52:44 AM     (No. 9169657)

The gun crackdown has nothing to do with crime but eradicating the 2nd amendment.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 722892




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "afortiori"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "afortiori"



Stop the Metaphor Madness
National Journal, by Major Garrett    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 11/28/2013 12:47:43 PM     Post Reply
Can we, before our L-Tryptophan coma commences, vow to abandon all attempts to festoon Obamacare with ridiculous historical metaphors? The damn law is big, with a regulatory heft now in excess of 20,000 pages. But even this governmental behemoth groans under the weight of metaphorical ornaments both daft and dull. Obamacare is not Katrina, not in fact or political impact. Obamacare is not Iraq, not in its human or material cost or in the reckless misuse of a commander in chief´s most sacred obligations of truth, judgment, and management. Obamacare is not the Bay of Pigs, not in concept, execution, or

   

 



 
Trayvon Martin and the
Irony of American Justice
Atlantic, by Ta-Nehisi Coates    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 7/15/2013 11:09:04 AM     Post Reply
In trying to assess the the killing of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman, two seemingly conflicted truths emerge for me. The first is that based on the case presented by the state, and based on Florida law, George Zimmerman should not have been convicted of second degree murder or manslaughter. The second is that the killing of Trayvon Martin is a profound injustice. In examining the first conclusion, I think it´s important to take a very hard look at the qualifications allowed for aggressors by Florida´s self-defense statute: Use of force by aggressor.

Why This Scandal Is Different
Wall Street Journal, by Peggy Noonan    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 6/1/2013 10:21:32 AM     Post Reply
Sometimes when you’re writing part of a column you keep getting close to the meaning of what you want to say but you don’t quite get there, the full formulation of the idea eludes you. Then two days later, relaxing in conversation with friends, the thought comes to you whole, and you think: That’s what I meant to say. That’s what I was trying to get. This week I had one of those moments.

Where Obama Went Wrong
In The Gun Control Fight
BuzzFeed, by Evan McMorris-Santoro & Ruby Cramer    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/20/2013 6:03:36 PM     Post Reply
In one of the toughest defeats of President Obama´s political career, the Senate this week sank a piece of gun control legislation that the White House had been laboring over for months. As the post-mortems of the loss begin, some have questioned if gun control got bogged down with the president´s ongoing struggle to effectively operate the levers of power in Washington. Culprits for the bill´s demise are plenty — from gutless Senate moderates, to inflexible pro-gun conservatives, to a brazen gun lobby that waged an aggressive, and sometimes misleading, campaign to defeat the legislation.

Let Not Your Heart Be Troubled
RedState.com, by Erick Erickson    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/20/2013 11:26:22 AM     Post Reply
I remember it so clearly — a memory you can only remember so clearly when it is from sadness. You can’t let it go. I was sitting in the mud by the rear passenger side tire of my old Acura cradling my one year old in the steady, driving rain. I was sobbing doing my best not to fall apart in front of my little girl. But the tears ran. My throat hurt as I tried to suppress the guttural cries I wanted to cry there in the mud.

With background check proposal,
Toomey’s not just firing off the cuff
Tribune-Review [Pittsburgh PA], by Eric Heyl    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/15/2013 9:41:37 AM     Post Reply
Pat Toomey obviously isn´t flummoxed by basic arithmetic. The Republican Pennsylvania senator is proving that as he and Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., attempt to modestly modify requirements for criminal background checks on gun purchases. The two senators, both gun-rights advocates, are pushing legislation that would require such checks for all gun show and Internet sales. Toomey is being labeled a Judas in conservative circles for backing what is being described incorrectly as a gun control bill. It is not.

Why I Didn´t Write About
Gosnell´s Trial--
And Why I Should Have
Daily Beast, by Megan McArdle    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/13/2013 10:45:59 AM     Post Reply
Kermit Gosnell, a Pennsylvania abortion doctor, is on trial for a lurid series of lurid crimes at his clinic. I can´t bring myself to describe them, so I´ll let Kirsten Powers do it. Infant beheadings. Severed baby feet in jars. A child screaming after it was delivered alive during an abortion procedure. Haven´t heard about these sickening accusations? It´s not your fault. Since the murder trial of Pennsylvania abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell began March 18, there has been precious little coverage of the case that should be on every news show and front page.

Justice Thomas talks at
Duquesne University, offers
surprises about life journey
Tribune-Review [Pittsburgh PA], by Debra Erdley    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/10/2013 9:53:28 AM     Post Reply
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, famous as the jurist who kept silent on the bench for seven years, has a lot to say. Thomas, on the court since 1991, visited Duquesne University on Tuesday afternoon and talked freely with law school Dean Ken Gormley and 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Thomas Hardiman (snip) Thomas, 64, known as one of the court´s most conservative justices, surprised some when he spoke of his sentiments as a young lawyer who voted for Hubert Humphrey and George McGovern

Ancient Chinese general’s
strategies should guide U.S.
in dealing with N. Korea
Tribune-Review [Pittsburgh PA], by Lou Kilzer    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/10/2013 9:45:11 AM     Post Reply
Five centuries before Christ, Sun Tzu wrote “The Art of War,” which teaches enduring principles of combat: Position troops so the enemy must face the sun. If an enemy leaves a door open, rush through. If outnumbered, retreat. The book by the ancient Chinese general and military strategist is well-known among those in the military and in the business world. Its underlying theme was the axiom, “All warfare is based on deception.” It is through this lens that Americans and others must view the situation with young North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.

Obama adviser: President doesn’t
seek ‘softball’ interviews
Washington Examiner, by Brian Hughes    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/3/2013 2:01:04 PM     Post Reply
President Obama has built a reputation for going around the traditional White House press corps in favor of so-called soft media, taking his message to “The View”, ESPN and friendly local radio, among other general-entertainment outlets. Who can forget these hard-hitting questions Obama was asked by a New Mexico radio station last August: “What’s your favorite song to work out to?” “If you had a superpower, what would it be?” But senior Obama adviser Dan Pfeiffer scoffed at the suggestion that the White House is deliberately avoiding tough questions.

The Reverse-Joads of California
Wall Street Journal, by Allysia Finley    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 3/4/2013 10:03:33 AM     Post Reply
During the Great Depression, some 1.3 million Americans—epitomized by the Joad family in John Steinbeck´s "The Grapes of Wrath"—flocked to California from the heartland. To keep out the so-called Okies, the state enacted a law barring indigent migrants (the law was later declared unconstitutional). Los Angeles even set up a border patrol on the city limits. Soon the state may need to build a fence to keep latter-day Joads from leaving. Over the past two decades, a net 3.4 million people have moved out of California for other states.

Baldwin & Shia’s B’way beef
New York Post, by Page Six    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 2/21/2013 10:31:14 AM     Post Reply
Shia LaBeouf abruptly exited his Broadway debut, “Orphans,” following apparent disagreements with his hot-tempered co-star Alec Baldwin that made them “incompatible.” Producers announced that LaBeouf parted ways with the show after just a week of rehearsals due to “creative differences,” even though the play’s scheduled to begin previews March 19. But last night LaBeouf, 26, posted e-mail exchanges on Twitter revealing divisions between him and bombastic Baldwin.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

53 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

44 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

34 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

White is not right: Campus admins ask
for help weeding out white people

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 7:47:18 PM     Post Reply
Western Washington University sent a questionnaire to students asking them for advice on how the administration could succeed at making sure that in future years, “we are not as white as we are today.” The question notes that WWU’s racial make up does not perfectly reflect the nation at large, and asks students to consider strategies that other universities have used to focus on skin color as the paramount indicator of a student-applicant’s worth. The president of WWU has stated that his explicit goal is to reduce the white population on campus, according to Campus Reform. “I’ve said before and I’ll say it

Atlanta Braves flooded with Hank
Aaron hate mail: He’s a ‘s*****g’

30 replie(s)
Washington Times (D.C.), by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/15/2014 3:23:19 PM     Post Reply
Hank Aaron’s recent comments about the need for America to realize that racism is still very much alive and thriving — only now due to those who wear “neckties and starched shirts” rather than KKK hoods — has sparked an angry backlash and many fans are turning the tables, calling the baseball legend himself a racist. “Hank Aaron is a s*****g piece of [expletive] [racial slur],” one man said in an email to the Atlanta Braves’ front office, one of the teams Mr. Aaron used to play for, CBS News reported. “My old man instilled in my mind from a

If a nuclear bomb exploded in downtown
Washington, what should you do?

29 replie(s)
The Week, by Marc Ambinder    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/15/2014 4:51:46 AM     Post Reply
Funny question in the headline, yes? But since President Obama worries more about the threat of terrorists´ improvised nuclear device going off in a major American city than anything Russia can throw at us, I was wondering if the government had deigned to share with us citizens any tips for, you know, surviving something their own intelligence points to as the likeliest unlikely Black Swan event. Well, no. And yes. No — very few people in Washington, D.C., who work for the government have any idea what they would do if a 10-kiloton nuclear device exploded at the intersection of 16th and K

Megyn Kelly and the
Sandberg Head Shaker

29 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Richard F. Miniter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:16:05 AM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly’s "Kelly File" is a great news show. She’s incisive, informed and customarily handles the toughest guest with aplomb. But her lengthy interview of Facebook C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg about her second book in the Lean In series Lean In: For Graduates was a head shaker. Amazing that she of all people allowed Sandberg to restring the same old, same old, shamed, and shopworn feminist myths about women and girls and then jangle it in front of her viewing audience like something new out of the box. Indeed Kelly all but genuflected in front of this woman. Kept her on thru

Obama taps gay bishop to wrap Easter
Prayer Breakfast with invocation

29 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 4/15/2014 9:25:28 AM     Post Reply
When President Obama needed a preacher to fulfill the closing prayer duties at the annual White House Easter Prayer Breakfast, he turned to none other than the Episcopal Church’s first openly gay bishop — who said he was as shocked as anyone at the appointment. The Right Rev. Gene Robinson said in a tweet, accompanied by a photo of Mr. Obama behind a podium at the event: “POTUS ‘preaches’ at the Easter prayer breakfast. Then, out of the blue, asks ME to close with prayer. OMG!” Newsmax said he also emphasized that the words he chose to close the breakfast

Obama Selects First Openly Gay
Episcopal Bishop to Lead Easter Prayer

27 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Andrew Kirell    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 12:46:05 PM     Post Reply
President Obama pulled a surprise move Monday at the White House’s Easter Prayer Breakfast when he selected Gene Robinson to lead the closing prayer. Robinson is famously known as the first openly gay Episcopal bishop. Talking Points Memo’s Tom Kludt spotted the following tweet from Robinson, who was in attendance: (Tweet) Robinson, 66, became diocesan bishop of New Hampshire in March 2004. He retired in January 2013 and is currently a senior fellow at the progressive

Developing: Russian fighter jet buzzes
U.S. Navy destroyer in Black Sea

27 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Lolita C. Baldor    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 12:49:12 PM     Post Reply
A Russian fighter jet made multiple, close-range passes near an American warship in the Black Sea for more than 90 minutes Saturday amid escalating tensions in the region, a U.S. military official said Monday. In the first public account of the incident, the official said the Russian Fencer flew within 1,000 yards of the USS Donald Cook, a Navy destroyer, at about 500 feet above sea level. Ship commanders considered the actions provocative and inconsistent with international agreements, prompting the ship to issue several radio queries and warnings. The fighter appeared to be unarmed and never was in danger of

   

Post Reply   Close thread 722892





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS