There is no fool like an old disgraced and proven wrong fool....

Get back in your pasture, Dan.

Same as obama´s BC with multiple Adobe Illustrator layers is "authentic".

These libs don´t need low information voters. They need total idiots.

Rather can´t let go of this. The way he looks at it the forged docs have no meaning because he knows Bush skipped out on NG duty.

When Kerry got back from Vietnam he was still an active duty reservist who never showed up for camp but I´m sure that doesn´t bother Rather one bit.

Bush was probably foolish when he was younger,like most people are but he put all that behind him when he quit drinking and became a practicing Christian.. Of course there´s no such thing as redemption for a conservative but there is for an animal abuser like Micheal Vick.

Those who believe that GW Bush skipped out on his guard duties are drinking demonrat kool aid.

Pathetic.

Oh, that old thing is flaring up again? Dan needs to give it a rest and check out a few BO stories.

Dan Blather. He´s part of the Axis, alright.

I have a hard time distinquishing Dan Rather from Al Gore.

A has been .

#9 - actually he´s a ´never was´.

That´s right, Dan, nobody proved it. BTW, Dan, is there any proof you do not sleep with little boys?

#3 I know next to nothing about how to operate Adobe, what got my attention was the modern PC language used. African American was not used back then as an ethnic descriptor. Negro or black was. That in my opinion, was the giveaway here.

Baloney. Within 48 hrs. the guy at Little Green Onions produced the "Throbbing Memo", which showed that the Bush Texas Air National document purporting to be from c. 1972 was actually typed using a Microsoft Word program. The bogus document had the same letter justification, pixel for pixel. When overlayed and "throbbed" the TANG document and the newly typed Microsoft Word copy were identical.

Oopsie! Little Green Footballs, not Onions. If you Google "Throbbing Memo", you´ll find it easily enough. I just did.

The left knows that LO-FO´s don´t do detail or prolonged concentration. So they win every argument every time.

Within hardly more than a day or two after the CBS documents were posted on the blog Little Green Footballs, responding experts, including topographers, font experts and a retired AF officer who, for almost 30 years, had been in charge of how AF documents were to be written, had decimated Rather´s "evidence." And, soon after, when CBS was forced to acknowledge from whom it had gotten these documents, it turned out to be -- surprise, surprise -- a Texan with a long history of scurrilous attacks on the Bush family. In his recent denial, Rather has once again proven the old adage: Being a lefty means never having to say you´re sorry.

BTW, #4. Not sure Kerry had any obligation to report to a Reserve meeting. Technically, every enlistment is for 6 years and one is considered active reserve until that time period ends. Let´s just stick with him being an exploitive, lying sack of s..t.

Well, I´ll be a coon on a red-hot skillet!
This old fool is beating the skeleton of the dead horse!
His logic is as thin as turnip soup.
If a frog had side pockets, he´d carry a hand gun and put this clown out of his misery.

Times New Roman. It is extremely unlikely that any Air National Guard office in 1972 had a typewriter with that typeface. But because he so wanted it to be true, Rather was taken in by it. Which just shows what a hateful old coot he is.

Give it up Danny, you are no longer revelent!

It does not matter what Bush did or did not do.
This was a case of the MSM trying to change the dynamics of the presidential election. For golly sakes, Clinton led protests against the USA, Gore was a complete phony, Kerry was a Coward that shopped around for purple hearts and only served about 11 weeks in Nam. Obama is a smoker, toker and dealer. He also hates the military and never served.
None of this mattered to the MSM.

If Sean Hannity is not a debate moderator next election, Republicans shouldn´t show up.

Good article. The expert testimony is a well deserved ´Thwap´ and can´t be delivered often enough.

Especially delicious is the fact (not in the article) that the only reason the forgery was exposed was Bush´s transparency. He issued standing orders in the WH that any military docs would be immediately posted on his WH web site. When the ´TANG Docs´ were submitted to the WH, they were immediately available to all... including experts like this. Funny how well that worked.

Dan is right folks, no proof they were forged. Of course you don,t have to prove forgery if the material in question was bald faced lies plucked from thin air. You can´t forge what never was.

TrueType Font?

Al contrar, they did in spades...the Rather docs had proportional character spacing...that was not available on typewriters at the supossed date of the supposed documents...that is where Blather screwed up. In his hateful attack on GW Bush Rather overlooked this critical point. The lying scum was caught!!

a brief review of the "docuMENTS" that led to Rather´s firing from CBS news.

Mary Mapes (Dan Rather´s producer at CBS news) obtained these "documents" from Bill Burkett (more about him next). Ms Mapes then offered these "documents" to the John Kerry Presidential Campaign, along with writing Rather´s report on them.

Bill Burkett has admitted to lying about the origin of the memos eventually claiming that he received the Killian documents from a woman calling herself "Lucy Ramirez." Burket is a nut job with a on-line rant published about how evil Bush was.

Lucy Ramirez has never been seen or heard from (if she ever existed). Burket purported received a phone call from her (why she called him, who knows) where she offered him the Killian documents. The documents were either delivered by a unnamed middle ma, or delivered by Ramirez in a supermarket parking lot. In order to protect Ramirez from being traced as the source of the memos through DNA on the documents, Burkett then burned the original documents after making copies of them, according to Burkett.

You cannot make this stuff up...

Rather is senile. Does anyone under the age of 50 even know who he is anymore?

A liberal keeps repeating the lie, even in the face of facts. They know people will forget the facts, IF they keep repeating the lie. Someone needs to simply call him a liar to his face, but unfortunately ´liar´ doesn´t have the sting it used to.

No one proved that Rather is not a serial poodle defiler.