...Barry....you devil....we just didn`t know you....now if you will just obliterate Ineedajob.....

As long as he uses these drones to only whack Muslims and never ever on U.S. soil, what´s the problem? Also, Islam is not compatible with one being a true American citizen. So they may call themselves U.S. citizens, but not really.

I think that most of us here would agree that this is what it takes to wipe out AQ vermin but if President Bush had ordered such a thing , the left would be screaming about the 16 year old´s resemblance to their collective son.

So, #2, why not only Catholics not on US soil? Remember, first they came for the Jews.

I have done enough reading recently on this subject to know that this is an extremely slippery slope, and we definitely don´t want to be on it, especially with this particular President. He seems to feel its ok when given an inch to take 5 miles.

A-men #4, a very slippery slope indeed, and we aren´t at the top of it either.

You two might be right but maybe if he starts wiping out ms13 the crips,the bloods and the rest I`m willing to say ´Hell yeah you go Barry>...!!

I´m with #4. The ends justify the means? Are we going to stoop to that, if we conservatives don´t support the rule of law who will.

Do this math: The president can take you out if he thinks you are a terrorist. Janet Napolitano thinks I´m a likely domestic terrorist by virtue of my deep respect for and comitment to the constitution, and that those of my ilk pose a greater threat to the country than foreign terrorists. What do you get?

Is murder considered to be a ´high crime´ or a ´misdemeanor´? Why is this man child not in a cell UNDER Leavenworth?

Now you see why the O´tard is being compared to Lincoln.

What we have here, is a Ninja President.
Flying at night, attacking his target and leaving unseen...NOT.

IMPEACH NOW!!!

#2, that is disgraceful. We as Americans support the Right to Life and the Rule of Law.

The Right to Life means, at the very least, that nobody has a right to assault and kill you unless you are proven guilty of a capital crime, and to make that determination --- unless you are in the midst of the actual assault --- requires morally certain proof, not just "The POTUS suspects it" or "He´s a Muslim."

The Rule of Law means, at the very least, that under the U.S. Constitution, no citizen may be deprived of live, liberty or property without due process of law.

If people don´t realize that letting a tyrant tike Obama kill people at will is quintessential injustice, then by the Almighty you will deserve your untimely and ungentle end.

Terrorist activities in Yemen quickly evolve to NRA activities in Arizona. Government is powerful the trick is to limit its capabilities. Hence the Constitution.

Barry Soetero claims for himself a broad right (from the comfort of his armchair) to decide which American citizens live or die. Outrageous--if an American citizen is suspected of terrorist activity then put him on trial--a closed trial if necessary--if that terrorist is unavailable then try him in absentia--but there must be a trial where the evidence of crime is presented and questioned, and a judgment rendered. Yes it would be inconvenient--taking the life of a citizen should always be extremely inconvenient. The crux here is that Barry does not think American citizenship is any big deal--see his recent proclamations on illegal immigration, for example.

Hmmm, Murder without due process...doesn´t that make him a criminal?