A Message From Lucianne  



Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

John Bolton on Obama Drone
Policy: Entirely Sensible,
Extension of Bush Policies

Reason Magazine, by Ed Krayewski

Original Article

Posted By:Pluperfect, 2/7/2013 6:26:46 AM

The former U.S ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton had some rare praise for President Obama, and specifically for his expansive drone war. Via Mediaite: “It seems to me that the approach that the Obama administration is following is consistent with and really derived from the Bush administration approach to the War on Terror,” Bolton told [Fox News] host Jenna Lee. “And I think it is entirely sensible. Whether it is foreign citizens who are involved with Al Qaeda or American citizens, we are in a war. They have attacked us. We have a congressional authorization


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: bugger, 2/7/2013 6:29:10 AM     (No. 9163002)

What? That does it, I now completely and sadly understand that we are living in the twilight zone.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 2 - Posted by: hhfi2, 2/7/2013 6:33:10 AM     (No. 9163004)

Saw him on Fox News a couple of days ago, making this same argument. I think he´s way out on a limb all by himself here.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 3 - Posted by: Lala, 2/7/2013 6:40:26 AM     (No. 9163005)

Bolton is smart like a fox. Nothing will raise the hackles of the Obamatrons quicker than high praise from someone like him. It´ll make their heads explode as they try to process it. Now, if Dick Cheney were to publicly agree, it will be great fun watching the One´s media lackeys twisting themselves into knots trying to cover.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 4 - Posted by: Rinktum, 2/7/2013 6:50:08 AM     (No. 9163010)

Disappointed to hear him say this. Using drones on the battlefield is one thing but using them over American soil is disturbing. Isn´t it the FBI´s job to hunt down the bad guys at home? It is just unsettling to give this kind of power to the government when it can so easily and quickly become abusive. The government truly is becoming a menace.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 5 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 2/7/2013 6:52:11 AM     (No. 9163012)

Dr. K agrees with him.

Combatants are combatants.

Is this a war or not ?

The reservations we feel are due to Barky´s penchant for domestic intrusion and meddling here at home with such devices.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 6 - Posted by: Freeloader, 2/7/2013 7:09:06 AM     (No. 9163025)

I usually enjoy the brilliant conservative insights of the Yale (summa cum laude) educated former ambassador with the "Yosemite Sam" mustache...This time, however, I think he may have wandered outside the park.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 7 - Posted by: Zarin, 2/7/2013 7:23:12 AM     (No. 9163055)

Sadly, I think he is right - I recall Newt Gingrich saying something like this during the primaries.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.




Reply 8 - Posted by: Rakasha, 2/7/2013 7:32:08 AM     (No. 9163077)

John Bolton is correct. This is the natural/logical consequence of the Patriot Act. So is the unrestricted monitoring of phone calls, e-mails and other electronic abilities. So are the ideas of monitoring people´s travel habits and gas consumption, flying over their properties with drone cameras, and pulling them over on the freeway for TSA type searches.

Are these things constitutional? No. Would George W. Bush have done them? Probably not. But, as many of us pointed out when Homeland Security and the Patriot Act were being established, George W. Bush was not going to be President forever. And that is the problem with starting a small ball rolling in an unconstitutional direction. Someone is going to come along and roll it a little faster and a little bigger.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 9 - Posted by: TunnelRat, 2/7/2013 7:44:56 AM     (No. 9163107)

"Whether it is foreign citizens who are involved with Al Qaeda or American citizens, we are in a war. They have attacked us. "

I agree with Mr. Bolton up to a point, and that is the point at which these drones begin to be deployed in American cities. While it may be proper to use whatever force is necessary against a terrorist, I am concerned about such weapons under the control of a government that has begun to consider Christians, conservatives, veterans, and gun-owners as potential terrorists.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 10 - Posted by: engrpat, 2/7/2013 7:54:21 AM     (No. 9163128)

What worries me is who gets to define just who or what is a "terrorist." Seems that definition could, and I am sure will, be changed with or without notice.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 11 - Posted by: iamtinman, 2/7/2013 7:55:25 AM     (No. 9163131)

You may need to fight the war on terror via unconventional means like drones, and you may have to kill american citizens who are fighting against our country, but that does NOT mean that you have to discard constitutional protections to do so. Due process is a constitutionally protected right and there´s no reason that it couldn´t be used in these cases!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 12 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 2/7/2013 7:56:16 AM     (No. 9163132)

obama has contempt for the Constitution. His ruthlessness is unconstrained by it. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe obama has no qualms about the use of drones to spy on domestic political enemies which include people who own firearms. I don´t understand Republicans who understate how dangerous, radical and untrustworthy the obama regime is.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 13 - Posted by: RussVet, 2/7/2013 7:57:06 AM     (No. 9163133)

Drone air attacks with deadly force ordered unilaterally by Resident Obozo against a sovereign nation; such as Yemen on their soil, with which we are not at war and pose no immediate threat to America is the act of a war criminal and in the case of the 16 year old American nonTerriost, a murderer... Immediate threat requires use of the war powers act and congress approval .. notice Obozo does it only to nations that cannot fight back... The act of a bully... try that in China or Russia ... any technically competent country can make drones and do that to Obozo... Would drone attacks be an act of war against America... you betcha

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 2/7/2013 8:12:33 AM     (No. 9163162)

Before I condemn the former Ambassador, I would like to know how he feels about that DHS report that was released regarding the subject of who they consider to be domestic terrorists. Because he certainly would fit into at least one category neatly. No question about it, this WH has no problems with using these drones over US soil on American citizens.

And is Bolton ok with actual terrorists using these drones in an attack on the Capitol building or the WH? Now that the drone home base is revealed to be in Saudi territory, it will only be a matter of time.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: JimS, 2/7/2013 8:16:34 AM     (No. 9163171)

With all due respect, Amb. Bolton, (and I do have great respect for you), just how does Obama´s death-by-drone policy comport with the silly rules of engagement imposed on our military. We have imposed more constraints on our military than the Knapp Commission imposed on the NYPD. Meanwhile, the approximately 2500 drone attacks have caused considerable collateral damage and casualties to innocent people.
Second, at just what point in time will Obama deem the Tea Party to be a subversive, terrorist leaning organization, and deploy drones? Do we have any faith at all that Obama won´t use drones to quell opposition, increase or retain political power, assert uncontitutional authority over the American citizenry?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 16 - Posted by: JAN, 2/7/2013 8:42:42 AM     (No. 9163229)

Yes, true. That said Obamao exoriated President Bush for every aspect of the anti terror program.

He shrieked that the terrorists didn´t get due process. He wanted the Gitmo prisoners to be tried in our US courtrooms.

It´s the rank hipocrisy that is so infuriating.

However, murdering a 16 yr. old boy who could easily have been grabbed off the street is over the top.

And to suggest he was murdered because he had the wrong father (Gibb´s comments) is sickening.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 17 - Posted by: curious1, 2/7/2013 8:59:53 AM     (No. 9163275)

#4, you might look in the constitution and its amendments for the clause giving the federal gov authority to have an FBI. I can´t find it in my copy. Generally, the states would be better at that anyway if their citizen´s income wasn´t stolen by the feds for ´redistributing´.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.




Reply 18 - Posted by: Guard SGT (ret), 2/7/2013 9:26:07 AM     (No. 9163323)

Overseas, this policy is fine. When I was in Iraq nearly 10 years ago, if crap happened, I wasn´t going to ask the person shooting at me for a passport to check their nationality before I fired back.

These terrorists have declared war on us many times here and abroad. They have declared ALL Americans combatants. This includes young, old, males, females, everyone, not just the military. So if you are in a location of known terrorists, you are a target. If civilians get hurt in the attack, I am not going to shed a tear.

Terrorists are not legal combatants. They have no rights under conventions or laws or war. If captured, we have to right under the above to execute them on the spot. I don´t favor that, but holding them in proper minimal conditions until the terrorists as a whole give up. No more catch and release. We hold you until the war is over, period. We never need to hold any trial

Now if such is done here, the reason had better be beyond all debate or there will be heck to pay. And if used against groups other than islamic terrorists such as the TEA Party, the Usurper and his Corrupt Party will face even larger heck. Much larger heck.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 19 - Posted by: pineledger, 2/7/2013 9:44:25 AM     (No. 9163369)

Let us remember (and keep reminding everyone) that Bush was forced to withdraw Brennan´s nomination.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 20 - Posted by: earlybird, 2/7/2013 9:44:58 AM     (No. 9163370)

These days Bolton is usually the smartest guy in the room.

We should be careful about loathing Obie so much that we, at some point, throw the baby out with the bath water.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 21 - Posted by: FormerDem, 2/7/2013 9:47:38 AM     (No. 9163383)

OK I´m done with Bolton. Never suggest him as ambassador for anything.Fully aware his past is stuffed with wisdom on various patchy subjects. Don´t care. No. No. No.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: GHOSTRIDER68, 2/7/2013 9:51:06 AM     (No. 9163390)

I am confused by many of the above posters. It´s OK for a citizen to shoot and kill a home-invader who may want to murder your Family without *due process*, but not OK to shoot and kill an American Terrorist who has sworn, and is working, to murder ALL our Families!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Reply 23 - Posted by: toddh, 2/7/2013 10:19:38 AM     (No. 9163463)

There are hundreds, if not thousands, of alleged Americans overseas working against America. If President Obama wants to kill some of his biggest supporters, I am going to watch and cheer.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 24 - Posted by: Rakasha, 2/7/2013 10:22:15 AM     (No. 9163467)

#22, It is okay to shoot a home invader when he is invading your home. It is not okay to shoot someone that you think might be a home invader because he is standing on the sidewalk looking at your home.

There are two problems here. One is that we don´t know what the rules of engagement are for using drones on Americans because those are secret. (Nothing to worry about there as long as you trust your government.) Two, our government has already listed as potential American terrorists: People who are strongly anti-abortion or have other deeply held religious convictions, people who defend the Constitution over the federal government or the UN, people who are of an individualistic nature, and returning veterans to name a few.

I have no problem with shooting and killing an American terrorist who has sworn, and is working, to murder our families. It´s some of the other possibilities that give me pause.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 25 - Posted by: thelmalou, 2/7/2013 10:30:33 AM     (No. 9163483)

#24 nails it in spades. Excellent points. I love Mr. Bolton, but I strongly disagree with him on this.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 26 - Posted by: GHOSTRIDER68, 2/7/2013 10:44:11 AM     (No. 9163512)

#24 Thank you for more food for thought about: *a government we can TRUST*!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.

Reply 27 - Posted by: coyote56, 2/7/2013 11:11:55 AM     (No. 9163570)

Does anyone remember a few years ago the report on Fox about a new underground bunker being built close to the WH? It was not reported on any newspaper or any MSM program. Also remember the Homeland Security purchasing great amounts of hollow nose bullits. Thoughts about what might happen are chilling! God will not put up with this crap - we better turn this ship around & soon or we are gone. II Chronicles 7:14

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Post Reply   Close thread 722459

Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"

NRA endorses McConnell in Ky. primary
The Hill [DC], by Rachel Huggins    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/13/2014 10:44:00 AM     Post Reply
The National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund announced Saturday it has endorsed Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) for re-election in the May 20 Kentucky primary. "Mitch McConnell is a true champion of our Second Amendment rights, leading the fight against President Obama, Harry Reid and Michael Bloomberg´s anti-freedom agenda," said Chris W. Cox, chairman of the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund, in a statement. "Sen. McConnell’s steadfast support of our Right to Keep and Bear Arms and hunting heritage has earned him an A+ rating from the NRA.” Participating in a Second Amendment rally with the Sportsmen for Team Mitch

New Scrabble word - geocache -
first ever chosen by gamers
Reuters, by Fausto Giovanny Pinto    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/13/2014 10:13:04 AM     Post Reply
There´s a new word in play on the Scrabble game board: geocache. The word, a verb meaning to track down items as part of a game using a Global Positioning System device, beat out 15 other nominated words in an online fan vote to select the newest addition to The Official Scrabble Players Dictionary. It´s the first change in nearly a decade to the beloved board game in which players build words - and earn points - using alphabet letter tiles, said Hasbro, the Pawtucket, Rhode Island, maker of Scrabble. It´s also the first time the players´ dictionary has included a word chosen

Obama Begins to Say Good-Bye
National Journal, by James Oliphant    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/13/2014 5:20:56 AM     Post Reply
Because you can find anything on the Web, you can easily search and pull up a running clock that tells you just how long, to the second, Barack Obama has been president. It moves in real time. It only feels like it´s speeding up. Constrained by crises over which he has little power to impact events, hemmed in by a divided Congress more interested in scoring points with voters than in legislating, and watching as his potential successor assumes more and more of the political spotlight, Obama may be receding into history more quickly than either he or his aides ever anticipated. It was impossible to listen to the president's speech Thursday

MH370 searchers prepare to stop listening
for black boxes after two days without a
ping and settle in for long seabed search
Daily Mail [UK], by Sophie Jane Evans    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/13/2014 5:16:48 AM     Post Reply
Search teams will ´stop listening for pings´ from missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370´s black box unless new signals are picked up, it has been revealed. Ten planes and 14 ships were scouring around 16,000 square miles of the Indian Ocean today in a bid to locate the device before its emergency beacons fade. But a U.S. Navy captain has said they could ´give up´ on the acoustic search following two days without a ping. ´When the time is right, we’ll say "Yes, the beacons have probably stopped transmitting" and it’s time to shift,´ Captain Mark Matthews told ABC News. He added that the

Goodbye tea party, hello big tent
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/13/2014 5:08:01 AM     Post Reply
Say what you will about Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), but they know a train wreck when they see it. They also know when to separate themselves from the cranks and the losers on the right. Although both supported the shutdown and were heartily supported by tea party groups in their own Senate races, neither one has endorsed Matt Bevin in Kentucky, Milton Wolf in Kansas or Chris McDaniel in Mississippi. In fact, Cruz’s office confirms he hasn’t endorsed anyone in the primaries. He may weigh in after the primaries. Rand Paul has endorsed two very establishment

Emanuel tightens cash controls
after $741,000 embezzlement
Chicago Sun-Times, by Frank Spielman    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/12/2014 4:53:36 AM     Post Reply
Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s administration is tightening the reins on cash handling to eliminate an embarrassing lack of oversight that allegedly allowed a low-level clerk in the Chicago Department of Transportation to embezzle nearly $750,000 in permit fees over a six-year period. In a memo to department heads, City Comptroller Dan Widawsky argued that “recent events have highlighted the risks associated with cash management” and the importance of “robust controls to manage” those risks. “We are the custodians of our city’s resources and you and your finance staff are critical to ensuring that such resources are safeguarded,” Widawsky wrote. “Each department head is responsibl

The legal question that could stop
China´s maritime power grab
Foreign Policy, by Keith Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/12/2014 4:40:53 AM     Post Reply
A diplomatic standoff between China and the Philippines that flared up two years ago in a dispute over fishing rights at a tiny shoal in the South China Sea is coming to a head after Manila decided to ignore Chinese threats and sue Beijing in an international tribunal. The legal case marks the first time that an arbitration panel will examine China´s contentious, and oft-disputed, claims to most of the South China Sea, one of the world´s busiest byways for shipping and a potentially rich source of oil and natural gas. The suit itself, a gargantuan, 4,000 page "memorial" filed before the

Tea Party Challenges Stumbling
as Primaries Approach
PJ Media, by Bill Straub    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/12/2014 4:37:00 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – Lawmakers with strong ties to the Tea Party movement have gained a toehold in the U.S. Senate but it appears they might have difficulty expanding their numbers this year. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) are among those associated with the conservative, grassroots drive that has proved influential within Republican Party politics in a relatively short period of time. But a review of upcoming Senate contests reveals that more establishmentarian Senate candidates maintain an edge – at least to this point – heading into the primary season. Conservative disaffection for the manner in which mainstream Republicans are

Video: Mentally ill man can’t stop talking
about the monsters under his bed
Hot Air, by Allahpundit    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/12/2014 4:32:44 AM     Post Reply
Really, really unfortunate to find the Free Beacon exploiting an insane derelict for easy page views. It’s one thing to giggle at the crazy man at the bus stop, it’s another to record him and put it on YouTube. Nor is this the first time they’ve had fun at the expense of someone with obvious brain damage. Just look what they did to poor Al Sharpton. You’ll be tempted to bail here after 10 seconds thinking you’ve got the point and thus there’s no need to watch it all. Wrong: The point is to watch it all, to absorb the extent

Obamas´ income drops 21% to $481,098
CNN, by Jeanne Sahadi    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/12/2014 4:22:14 AM     Post Reply
New York - President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama reported an adjusted gross income of $481,098 for 2013 -- about 21% less than the year before. The bulk of their income came from the president´s salary, but the Obamas also reported roughly $100,000 in business income from Random House and literary management company Dystel & Goderich. The White House released the couple´s 2013 federal tax return on Friday. Their federal tax bill for 2013 came to $98,169, according to their return. That´s an effective federal tax rate of 20.4% on the First Family´s AGI. But because they already paid $117,277 in federal taxes,

Hollywood Funeral for Mickey
Rooney Set After Dispute Settled
ABC News, by Michael Rothman    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/12/2014 4:18:12 AM     Post Reply
An agreement has been reached on where to bury iconic actor Mickey Rooney, ABC News has confirmed. A dispute was settled Thursday between Rooney´s estranged wife and his conservator, the Los Angeles Times reported. Rooney died Sunday at age 93. The conservator, Michael Augustine, filed papers Tuesday noting that Rooney´s wife, Jan Chamberlin, and her son Chris Aber had attempted to move his body against the late actor´s wishes. She wanted him buried at Westlake Village cemetery, where he bought plots during better times with his wife, while Augustine wanted to fulfill the actor’s wishes to be buried away from

Pope assumes responsibility
for priest sex abuse
Associated Press, by Nicole Winfield    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/11/2014 1:53:30 PM     Post Reply
VATICAN CITY -- Pope Francis said Friday he took personal responsibility for the "evil" of priests who raped and molested children, asking forgiveness from victims and saying the church must be even bolder in its efforts to protect the young. It was the first time a pope has taken personal responsibility for the sex crimes of his priests and begged forgiveness. Francis made the off-the-cuff remarks after coming under criticism from victims´ advocacy groups for a perceived lack of attention to the sexual abuse scandal and ongoing demands that he sanction bishops who covered up for pedophiles. He delivered the comments to

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Meet the Clinton shoe-thrower
65 replie(s)
NBC Universal, by Emma Margolin    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 4/12/2014 5:03:17 PM     Post Reply
Who throws a shoe? Honestly! That would be 36-year-old Alison Ernst of Phoenix, Arizona, who was charged Thursday night with disorderly conduct by the Las Vegas Police Department after allegedly throwing a shoe at former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. According to NBC News, who spoke with a Secret Service official, the U.S. Attorney’s office has declined federal prosecution. Ernst was wearing shoes on Thursday night when she attended a speech Clinton was giving in Las Vegas, but apparently brought an extra one specifically to throw at the former secretary of state. The official said the incident appeared to be “premeditated.”

Bundy Ranch, the Federal Government,
and the Nevada Water Tipping Point

61 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Monica Morrill    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 4/12/2014 7:29:42 AM     Post Reply
Many Americans have been watching with great consternation the ongoing struggle between the Federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Marshals against Cliven Bundy and his family. There are no signs of either side relinquishing their position. Many onlookers have been informed that this dispute is over protecting the desert tortoise. But it is nothing of the sort. In fact, the reality of the dispute goes far underneath what is being talked about. The more appropriate source of the dispute is ground water as well as surface water -- this is a war over water. Cliven Bundy and his

Nevada Cattle Rancher Wins
´Range War´ With Feds

42 replie(s)
ABC News, by Liz Fields    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/12/2014 3:33:27 PM     Post Reply
A Nevada cattle rancher appears to have won his week-long battle with the federal government over a controversial cattle roundup that had led to the arrest of several protesters. Cliven Bundy went head to head with the Bureau of Land Management over the removal of hundreds of his cattle from federal land, where the government said they were grazing illegally. Bundy claims his herd of roughly 900 cattle have grazed on the land along the riverbed near Bunkerville, 80 miles northeast of Las Vegas, since 1870 and threatened a "range war" against the BLM on the Bundy Ranch website after one of

Barbara Boxer Says Keystone
Pipeline a Cancer Risk

38 replie(s)
Breitbart California, by William Bigelow    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/12/2014 6:54:45 PM     Post Reply
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) is now accusing the Keystone pipeline of being a cancer risk. Her first point was that the pipeline “will bring 830,000 barrels of dirty tar sands oil into our nation every day.” She then segued to point #2 by asserting that the heavy tar sands oil will put people who live near refineries at risk for cancer: Significantly higher levels of dangerous air pollutants and carcinogens have been documented downwind from tar sands refineries, and in these areas people are suffering higher rates of the types of cancers linked to these toxic chemicals, including leukemia and

Why The Feds Chickened Out
On A Nevada Ranch

36 replie(s)
Townhall, by Kevin McCullough    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/13/2014 11:55:18 AM     Post Reply
Let me obliterate a bit of confusion here: the Obama administration attempted to go to war with a rancher in Nevada. Let me amplify a little bit of truth: They tucked tail and have returned home. And let me add a bit of clarity: they had no choice! As the nation began to become familiar with the plight of the family of Cliven Bundy, many of us harkened back to another standoff in which the Federal government attempted to bully it´s outcome: Waco, Texas and the Branch Davidian massacre. It is telling that in the Nevada case the feds pulled out so

President Obama stands by Rev. Al Sharpton
while accusing Republicans of trying
to restrict the right to vote

35 replie(s)
New York Daily News, by Celeste Katz & Annie Karni    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 4/12/2014 7:02:39 AM     Post Reply
President Obama stood Friday with the Rev. Al Sharpton and accused Republicans of trying to keep millions of Americans from voting, in a fiery speech days after new revelations about Sharpton’s past as an FBI informant. “The right to vote is threatened today in a way that it has not been since the Voting Rights Act became law nearly five decades ago,” Obama told the annual convention of Sharpton’s National Action Network in Manhattan. Obama’s appearance represented a presidential seal of approval of Sharpton’s role as a civil rights activist, amid the new revelations about how Sharpton used a wire to record

Why Hillary v. Jeb Would
Be Great for America

33 replie(s)
Daily Beast, by Mark McKinnon    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/13/2014 6:11:32 PM     Post Reply
They’re both qualified, respectful of each other (shocker!), and represent the vast majority of middle America. So what’s not to like about another Clinton/Bush race for 2016? When you mention the prospect of Clinton vs. Bush 2016 a funny thing happens. First, there is the reflexive response: "Oh no, not again. We don´t need more dynastic politics in this country." But upon further reflection, you realize Jeb Bush vs. Hillary Clinton would be a great race and actually good for the country. Let´s review. QUALIFICATIONS—THEY’VE BOTH GOT THEM. Barack Obama won the presidency because in an election where the premium was on change, it mattered little

The world must shift to solar and wind
power rapidly to avoid catastrophic global
warming, say UN scientists in major report

30 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Ben Spencer    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/13/2014 7:15:31 PM     Post Reply
A rapid shift to wind and solar power is needed if the world is to avoid catastrophic global warming, the United Nations warns in a crucial report today. Emissions of greenhouse gases need to be cut by up to 70 per cent before 2050 to control climate change, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says. ‘Large-scale changes in energy systems’ are required, with coal power stations to be switched off and replaced by wind and solar. And the transformation needs to be made in the next 15 years or controlling climate change will become increasingly harder and more expensive. The report was published

Goodbye tea party, hello big tent
28 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/13/2014 5:08:01 AM     Post Reply
Say what you will about Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), but they know a train wreck when they see it. They also know when to separate themselves from the cranks and the losers on the right. Although both supported the shutdown and were heartily supported by tea party groups in their own Senate races, neither one has endorsed Matt Bevin in Kentucky, Milton Wolf in Kansas or Chris McDaniel in Mississippi. In fact, Cruz’s office confirms he hasn’t endorsed anyone in the primaries. He may weigh in after the primaries. Rand Paul has endorsed two very establishment

Nevada GOP removes social issues from platform,
moves ahead with pre-primary endorsements

28 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Sandra Chereb    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/13/2014 3:48:58 PM     Post Reply
LAS VEGAS — The Nevada Republican Party stripped opposition to abortion and gay marriage from its platform Saturday as state convention delegates instead focused on judging fellow Republicans on their worthiness to serve in office and adherence to GOP values. The platform, with few changes, was adopted overwhelmingly as the Las Vegas convention stretched late into the evening. The vote mirrors that of the Clark County GOP, which voted earlier to remove platform language defining marriage as between a man and a woman and statements opposing abortion. Many Republicans are re-evaluating their strong stances on conservative social issues as public

Video: Flash mob of women steal
$20,000 worth of sunglasses
from California store

27 replie(s)
New York Daily News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/13/2014 10:50:38 AM     Post Reply
A brazen flash mob has been caught on camera storming a California store and making off with $20,000 worth of sunglasses. Surveillance footage shows eight women piling into a Sunglass Hut and crowding around display cases. Shielding workers from what they´re doing, they quickly stuff dozens of fashion specs into their bags. A store clerk pleads with them to stop, before running out of the shot to get help and dial 911. The thieves then all bolt outside and escape in a waiting SUV. The incident occurred at the Valencia Town Center mall, in Santa Clarita, at 3 p.m. on

Democrat Center Folds
25 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: real fifi- 4/13/2014 7:44:30 AM     Post Reply
It’s hardly been a secret that in recent years the moderate center of the Democrat party has been driven away and what remains is a conglomeration of disparate blocs which, to date, the party has been able to treat as if there were no conflicting interests between them. As the midterm elections approach and the administration’s incompetence, along with the distaste for the president’s signature ObamaCare legislation, drive the party’s chances down further, the make-believe coalition of opposites may well crumble if the opposition doesn’t blow it. Democrats hope to retain control of the Senate and recapture the House by driving

Post Reply   Close thread 722459

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.