A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


To Kill an American
New York Times, by Editorial

Original Article

Posted By:Pluperfect, 2/6/2013 5:53:15 AM

On one level, there were not too many surprises in the newly disclosed “white paper” offering a legal reasoning behind the claim that President Obama has the power to order the killing of American citizens who are believed to be part of Al Qaeda. We knew Mr. Obama and his lawyers believed he has that power under the Constitution and federal law. We also knew that he utterly rejects the idea that Congress or the courts have any right to review such a decision in advance, or even after the fact.

Comments:
The Times had to insert George W. Bush, but he never ordered something like this.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: 3XALADY, 2/6/2013 6:17:55 AM     (No. 9161039)

Where are conservatives and Christians on his list?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: WhamDBambam, 2/6/2013 6:42:40 AM     (No. 9161059)

Darn shame if someone felt the same about him.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: right-turn, 2/6/2013 6:52:20 AM     (No. 9161069)

Any doubts about how Obama thinks he is the emperor. No stinking constitution will stand in his way. Laws are what he decides they will be.

The worst president in history!!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Wetlandz, 2/6/2013 6:53:44 AM     (No. 9161070)

dear NY slimes, your chickens are coming home to roost, you created this monster and I hope he eats the ones that built him before he comes after the rest of us who are trying to expose him for what he is, the exact opposite of the fairy tale you obtuse media cronies created.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 5 - Posted by: Hank Reardon, 2/6/2013 6:54:29 AM     (No. 9161071)

Wait until they start picking off farmers and ranchers and other folks they deem "dangerous."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: FunOne, 2/6/2013 7:22:44 AM     (No. 9161100)

Every day, Obama looks more like Robert Mugabe, and America looks more like Zimbabwe.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: turninggrey, 2/6/2013 7:25:42 AM     (No. 9161104)

By the way, THIS is why the founding fathers were so adamant about the second amendment. It is not about hunting or home protection. It is about stopping tyranny.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Arby, 2/6/2013 7:30:39 AM     (No. 9161110)

What goeth aroundeth cometh aroundeth. You bought him; you own him.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 9 - Posted by: Pros7767, 2/6/2013 7:33:14 AM     (No. 9161113)

Initially I had no problem with taking Al Awaki out by drone. Of course I assumed there was ample evidence to support that he was a terrorist and dangerous to the US interests.

However, this rationale terrifies me. There are no standards necessary to justify the action. No evidence required to support murdering an American citizen, just a baseball card for our dear leader. Under this policy, he can decide to take out anyone he wants. Scary.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 2/6/2013 7:37:41 AM     (No. 9161121)

If you really want a scare, read the Ulsterman Report link posted earlier today. Absolutely chilling behaviour from this President.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: rustycfc, 2/6/2013 7:41:10 AM     (No. 9161125)

like that old saying,you get what you pay for.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: troutgreen, 2/6/2013 7:48:19 AM     (No. 9161141)

How convenient. No more will ATF agents have to wait for a tank to ram firebombs through a window to get rid of Americans deemed to be troublesome like they did in Waco. Now some faceless beaurocrat can decide you´re a threat, and bam, you´re gone.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Grace Veritas, 2/6/2013 7:53:49 AM     (No. 9161160)

Most chilling aspect for the NYTimes? It reminds them, a little, of Bush. 2nd paragraph.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: BirdsNest, 2/6/2013 7:54:00 AM     (No. 9161162)

Bourne Legacy starring Jeremy Renner.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: NYBruin, 2/6/2013 7:54:17 AM     (No. 9161163)

I guess this means the Times editorial board are a bunch of racists. . .

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Rusino, 2/6/2013 8:02:26 AM     (No. 9161188)

The Emporer has Spoken. Will his subjects ever notice he wears no clothes?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 17 - Posted by: Rusino, 2/6/2013 8:04:45 AM     (No. 9161193)

What difference does it make anyway?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Fiesta del sol, 2/6/2013 8:17:23 AM     (No. 9161220)

#5, the EPA already has surveillance drones above the midwest, targeting farmers. No one knows how many drones, what data they are collecting, etc.
http://latham.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=299185

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Judith, 2/6/2013 8:17:51 AM     (No. 9161221)

Sulzberger has a loooong history (vietnam period)of wishing American´s killed. And indicating he would be willing to assist in that goal.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: saucy, 2/6/2013 8:42:16 AM     (No. 9161277)

Crimes and misdemeanors = IMPEACHMENT

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 2/6/2013 8:45:00 AM     (No. 9161285)

Liberal trick: Dumb down the definition of "citizen" to be anything that slinks across the border, or with ideological desires to overthrow the Constitution and establish a caliphate, thereby making "citizens" in the US and abroad criminal, and guilty until proven innocent.
Never mind that the ATF/FBI/DOJ are constantly hitting the wrong house in a raid.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Conesold, 2/6/2013 9:02:40 AM     (No. 9161325)

Does this do away with a person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: dbdiva, 2/6/2013 9:09:43 AM     (No. 9161351)

I can imagine that at some point the right to kill an “informed, high-level official” will morph into the right to kill that "pesky Christian on Elm Street"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: smsnod, 2/6/2013 9:13:05 AM     (No. 9161363)

Wow, after reading the comments after the editorial, all those liberal, smart, enlightened NYT readers have changed their minds about the use of force against terrorists. Now they seem to think that it´s all right and the ALCU should butt out of obama´s business. What an amazing turnaround.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 25 - Posted by: John318, 2/6/2013 9:21:03 AM     (No. 9161381)

Good Bye America- it´s just a matter of time now. "You reap what you sow"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: dolphin, 2/6/2013 9:28:47 AM     (No. 9161398)

If someone joins an army that is intent upon destroying this country, why is he still a citizen?

Ditto #23. This DOES open us all up to being on some emperor´s hit list.

This is the foundation for something else quite larger and more sinister.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Layne´s Soapbox, 2/6/2013 9:42:28 AM     (No. 9161426)

Someone woke up and smelled the coffee.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Hotrod, 2/6/2013 9:54:15 AM     (No. 9161457)

A terrorist is a terrorist, no matter where he is from. If he is threatening the lives of Americans, he has waived ´´due process.´´

Police snipers (and other law enforcement types) kill Americans all the time when they threaten hostages in a shopping mall, or elsewhere. Heck, even a private citizen can kill a person who is threatening the life of another person. An American who threatens the lives of other innocent Americans, by joining or actively supporting terrorists, deserves to die at the earliest possible moment.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: lil dotty, 2/6/2013 9:56:41 AM     (No. 9161459)

#2 many do, but he is only kenyan, not American-- so ´ya can´t touch this´

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: AWAKE, 2/6/2013 9:56:55 AM     (No. 9161460)

#26 Yuo´re right. And remember Big Sis and all her talk about domestic threats from extreme right wing groups. Let´s take em out to remove the threat.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 31 - Posted by: RealityChick, 2/6/2013 10:03:30 AM     (No. 9161483)

Am I just paranoid? ...because all of this makes me think twice about communicating via email with likeminded conservatives...also about posting to sites like this one, which I love by the way. Helps me keep my sanity.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: oh-heck, 2/6/2013 10:04:11 AM     (No. 9161486)

Bogus claim: It had the air of a legal justification written after the fact for a policy decision that had already been made, and it brought back unwelcome memories of memos written for President George W. Bush to justify illegal wiretapping, indefinite detention, kidnapping, abuse and torture.

Bush would get legal opinions before making decisions. He would then inform Congress according to law. When information was leaked to the press, they would disagree with the decisions. But Bush followed the law. Obama doesn´t bother to get legal opinions up front. When forced, he will have someone craft an opinion after the fact. These nearly always sloppy and ill thought out.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: Eheu Fugaces, 2/6/2013 10:34:29 AM     (No. 9161591)

And just wait until Obama´s "Superdrone" video game expands its activities from foreign soil to U.S. territory, and its target list from Al Qaeda terrorists to "domestic terrorists", like say, the Tea Party, hmmmm? I know, I know, paranoia -- it will never happen.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: gator, 2/6/2013 11:01:34 AM     (No. 9161674)

The horse has already left the barn. He has all the essential ingredients for complete domination; the media, academia, no opposing political party to speak of, and an overwhelmingly ignorant and apathetic population. He is now unstoppable, and he knows it!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Felixcat, 2/6/2013 11:03:10 AM     (No. 9161680)

So the government cannot "torture" aka waterboard foreign national terorists but okey dokey to kill American citizens with drone attacks.





  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: nonsense, 2/6/2013 11:15:24 AM     (No. 9161717)

Do you suppose Fox News is on the "kill" list? Peace Prize King gone awry.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: drbulb, 2/6/2013 11:16:31 AM     (No. 9161719)

I certainly hope that no one in say, North Korea decides that Øbama is a "threat to their security"...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 38 - Posted by: vwlarry, 2/6/2013 11:17:34 AM     (No. 9161722)

All Ldotters should see the movie "Minority Report".

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: ida Lou Pino, 2/6/2013 11:18:28 AM     (No. 9161728)

The NYT is fully outraged!

In fact - - they might even add a second "tut" to the first one they just uttered - - making it a full "tut-tut" - - a sign of unbridled fury not known anywhere this side of Hell.

I´ve heard that their Style section may not even review Moochelle´s next haircut - - that´s how outraged they are!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: previouslyon24, 2/6/2013 11:19:35 AM     (No. 9161731)

Obama´s only mistake was not allowing the NYT to get in on the drafting of the document; then they´d be okay with it, but not being part of the decision causes them to wonder if they aren´t at the table of power like they thought they´d be. It´s a pure power discussion with liberals, nothing to do with constitutional questions.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 41 - Posted by: 6079 Smith, W, 2/6/2013 11:28:03 AM     (No. 9161754)

So, in their minds, an American can be killed without due process, but an enemy MUST have due process.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: texsupreme, 2/6/2013 12:00:40 PM     (No. 9161833)

# 28, totally misses the point IMHO. The issue here has nothing to do with the bad guys.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 43 - Posted by: knarfski, 2/6/2013 12:18:49 PM     (No. 9161888)

Agree with #42 (except for "nothing").

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 44 - Posted by: merrijane, 2/6/2013 12:32:42 PM     (No. 9161918)

Funny how the NYT commenters have suddenly become so hawkish.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 45 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 2/6/2013 2:40:47 PM     (No. 9162143)

So, just now the liberals are starting understand this guy we have as our President is a fiend? Shame on those blind idiots. Lowinfo types are very disturbing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 46 - Posted by: steveracer, 2/6/2013 2:50:20 PM     (No. 9162165)

Might there be a connection albeit paranoid between limiting the right of a citizen to have a gun and legitimizing the government´s right to kill that citizen with a drone?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 47 - Posted by: kennedylaw, 2/6/2013 3:10:09 PM     (No. 9162202)

It is perfectly o.k. for the President to order the assassination of U.S. citizens just whatever you do don´t waterboard terrorists for information.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 48 - Posted by: Japanorama, 2/6/2013 3:34:39 PM     (No. 9162258)

Democrats care nothing about the American Constitution.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 49 - Posted by: rc1776, 2/6/2013 3:45:15 PM     (No. 9162278)

If De al Qaeda residenial wh bogus curtsying bleached bath house queen Ø´blo the blamer could it would change all Americans to desert camel jockies.

Ala Akbar Yaw´all

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 50 - Posted by: Coy860, 2/6/2013 3:50:16 PM     (No. 9162289)

Refresher course: From the Washington Times, 2009
"Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Wednesday that she was briefed before the release of a controversial intelligence assessment and that she stands by the report, which lists returning veterans among terrorist risks to the U.S".



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 51 - Posted by: msjena, 2/6/2013 3:53:11 PM     (No. 9162293)

Well, we all know that wiretapping the phones of suspected terrorists abroad who are US is citizens is much worse than killing them--right?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 52 - Posted by: donnaclaire, 2/6/2013 4:19:16 PM     (No. 9162332)

I´m likely already on the list - conservative.......tea party believer....... Republican supporter/voter......Obama criticizer.

The leftists and dunderheads who put him in office will go along with this super idea, and enjoy it, till they do something he really, really doesn´t like and they´ll be on the list too.

Everything´s just peachy, isn´t it, with this wonderful man as our ´boss´ - as Chris Rock calls him?



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 53 - Posted by: Italiano, 2/6/2013 4:20:03 PM     (No. 9162336)

Their definition of "terrorist" will no doubt evolve over the next few years, as will the geographical areas where these hits will be permissible.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 54 - Posted by: jkcinsalem, 2/6/2013 4:52:16 PM     (No. 9162387)

As easy as BO takes people out with drones, it sort of makes you doubt he had trouble ordering the hit on OBL. The storyline that he did, doesn´t make sense.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 55 - Posted by: Italiano, 2/6/2013 5:04:47 PM     (No. 9162406)

All I know is, if Valerie Jarrett´s deadbeat tenants in Chicago start getting mysteriously whacked from above, I´m going to be very suspicious.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 56 - Posted by: johngalt1, 2/6/2013 8:13:39 PM     (No. 9162626)

There is a big distinction between requiring prior legislative briefings and/or civilian judicial approval of targeted killing of Americans engaged in overseas combat operations against the U.S., and requiring after-action reviews.

A mandatory after-action review of every targeted killing of an American enemy combatant is appropriate and should be written into law immediately. However, it would be a serious national security mistake to treat overseas American enemy combatants as domestic criminals.

In situations where domestic criminals pose an immediate threat to innocent life, the legal authority to use lethal force can range from a citizen acting in self-defense, to cop on the scene or a law-enforcement SWAT commander.

There are very good reasons why enemy combatants are treated differently from domestic criminals. Enemy combatants—U.S. citizens or not—engaged in or planning violent acts against the U.S. itself outside its borders are committing extraterritorial acts of war. For this reason, the authority to use lethal force ultimately resides in our Commander-in-Chief—whoever may be in office at the time.

If extraterritorial American enemy combatants are given immunity from lethal strikes without prior due process in civilian courts, we should expect a continuous flow of damaging national security leaks and a dramatic rise in the recruitment of American citizens for foreign operations by organizations like al-Qaeda.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 57 - Posted by: Pinons, 2/6/2013 9:29:59 PM     (No. 9162691)

Obozo either does not lift a finger and watches Americans die before his very eyes (Benghazi) or he wants to kill them. Crazy Kenyan!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 58 - Posted by: artlover, 2/6/2013 10:18:37 PM     (No. 9162756)

None of you can tell anyone what to do now. It is over. We are never going to have freedom again. We will forevermore be a socialist country. We will have someone telling us how we live, how we eat, how we dress, what we drive, and on and on, and there is nothing we can do about it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 59 - Posted by: Tianne, 2/6/2013 10:51:39 PM     (No. 9162788)

For the life of me I just don´t understand. According to the President and his Justice Department, the foreign planners and executors of the 9.11 attacks should not be rushed to judgement but should enjoy the same defense court privileges reserved for American citizens but American citizens accused of encouraging similar acts aren´t entitled to the same court privileges but rather should be ´eliminated´. It´s not that I believe that American citizens threatening to do us harm should not be dealt with harshly, it´s just that I can´t grasp the rationale of the President making distinctions between terrorists and granting foreign terrorists greater protections.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment



Post Reply   Close thread 722267




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"



Emanuel tightens cash controls
after $741,000 embezzlement
Chicago Sun-Times, by Frank Spielman    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/12/2014 4:53:36 AM     Post Reply
Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s administration is tightening the reins on cash handling to eliminate an embarrassing lack of oversight that allegedly allowed a low-level clerk in the Chicago Department of Transportation to embezzle nearly $750,000 in permit fees over a six-year period. In a memo to department heads, City Comptroller Dan Widawsky argued that “recent events have highlighted the risks associated with cash management” and the importance of “robust controls to manage” those risks. “We are the custodians of our city’s resources and you and your finance staff are critical to ensuring that such resources are safeguarded,” Widawsky wrote. “Each department head is responsibl

The legal question that could stop
China´s maritime power grab
Foreign Policy, by Keith Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/12/2014 4:40:53 AM     Post Reply
A diplomatic standoff between China and the Philippines that flared up two years ago in a dispute over fishing rights at a tiny shoal in the South China Sea is coming to a head after Manila decided to ignore Chinese threats and sue Beijing in an international tribunal. The legal case marks the first time that an arbitration panel will examine China´s contentious, and oft-disputed, claims to most of the South China Sea, one of the world´s busiest byways for shipping and a potentially rich source of oil and natural gas. The suit itself, a gargantuan, 4,000 page "memorial" filed before the

Tea Party Challenges Stumbling
as Primaries Approach
PJ Media, by Bill Straub    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/12/2014 4:37:00 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – Lawmakers with strong ties to the Tea Party movement have gained a toehold in the U.S. Senate but it appears they might have difficulty expanding their numbers this year. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) are among those associated with the conservative, grassroots drive that has proved influential within Republican Party politics in a relatively short period of time. But a review of upcoming Senate contests reveals that more establishmentarian Senate candidates maintain an edge – at least to this point – heading into the primary season. Conservative disaffection for the manner in which mainstream Republicans are

Video: Mentally ill man can’t stop talking
about the monsters under his bed
Hot Air, by Allahpundit    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/12/2014 4:32:44 AM     Post Reply
Really, really unfortunate to find the Free Beacon exploiting an insane derelict for easy page views. It’s one thing to giggle at the crazy man at the bus stop, it’s another to record him and put it on YouTube. Nor is this the first time they’ve had fun at the expense of someone with obvious brain damage. Just look what they did to poor Al Sharpton. You’ll be tempted to bail here after 10 seconds thinking you’ve got the point and thus there’s no need to watch it all. Wrong: The point is to watch it all, to absorb the extent

Obamas´ income drops 21% to $481,098
CNN, by Jeanne Sahadi    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/12/2014 4:22:14 AM     Post Reply
New York - President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama reported an adjusted gross income of $481,098 for 2013 -- about 21% less than the year before. The bulk of their income came from the president´s salary, but the Obamas also reported roughly $100,000 in business income from Random House and literary management company Dystel & Goderich. The White House released the couple´s 2013 federal tax return on Friday. Their federal tax bill for 2013 came to $98,169, according to their return. That´s an effective federal tax rate of 20.4% on the First Family´s AGI. But because they already paid $117,277 in federal taxes,

Hollywood Funeral for Mickey
Rooney Set After Dispute Settled
ABC News, by Michael Rothman    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/12/2014 4:18:12 AM     Post Reply
An agreement has been reached on where to bury iconic actor Mickey Rooney, ABC News has confirmed. A dispute was settled Thursday between Rooney´s estranged wife and his conservator, the Los Angeles Times reported. Rooney died Sunday at age 93. The conservator, Michael Augustine, filed papers Tuesday noting that Rooney´s wife, Jan Chamberlin, and her son Chris Aber had attempted to move his body against the late actor´s wishes. She wanted him buried at Westlake Village cemetery, where he bought plots during better times with his wife, while Augustine wanted to fulfill the actor’s wishes to be buried away from

Pope assumes responsibility
for priest sex abuse
Associated Press, by Nicole Winfield    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/11/2014 1:53:30 PM     Post Reply
VATICAN CITY -- Pope Francis said Friday he took personal responsibility for the "evil" of priests who raped and molested children, asking forgiveness from victims and saying the church must be even bolder in its efforts to protect the young. It was the first time a pope has taken personal responsibility for the sex crimes of his priests and begged forgiveness. Francis made the off-the-cuff remarks after coming under criticism from victims´ advocacy groups for a perceived lack of attention to the sexual abuse scandal and ongoing demands that he sanction bishops who covered up for pedophiles. He delivered the comments to

The IRS Scandal Comes Into Focus
Wall Street Journal, by Kimberley A. Strassel    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/11/2014 6:33:53 AM     Post Reply
Nearly a year into the IRS scandal, we still don´t know exactly what happened—though we are finally getting an inkling. That´s thanks to the letter House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp sent this week to the Justice Department recommending a criminal probe of Lois Lerner. The average citizen might be dizzied by the torrent of confusing terms—BOLO lists, Tigta, 501(c)(4)—and the array of accusations that have made up this IRS investigation. Mr. Camp´s letter takes a step back to remind us why this matters, even as it provides compelling new information that goes to motive and method—and clarifies some of

Sarah Palin Searches
for the Great Outdoors
Wall Street Journal, by Alexandra Wolfe    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/11/2014 6:07:51 AM     Post Reply
Sarah Palin is walking through a suite in the Peninsula New York Hotel in midtown Manhattan trying to find the great outdoors. The former GOP vice presidential candidate is being photographed before the launch of her new reality series, "Amazing America," which features human-interest tales about outdoor adventures, ranging from a blacksmith championship to a car race among pastors. But the suite doesn´t even have a landscape painting. She finally finds a window to pose in front of, but it´s facing a brick wall, not the wilderness. Crammed into two tiny rooms with eight other people—including her husband and two handlers—Ms.

The Democrats’ Koch habit
won’t help them in November
Washington Post, by Ed Rogers    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/11/2014 5:25:11 AM     Post Reply
From the anti-Koch ads running in Senate campaigns to Senator Harry Reid’s (D-NV) rant claiming the latest Ryan budget is a gift tailor-made for the Kochs, the Koch brothers appear to be everywhere the Democrats look. Or, the Democrats want to make it seem like the Kochs are everywhere. I’m not really sure. I think it’s kind of weird. A majority of Americans have never even heard of the Koch brothers. The general public could not pick the brothers out of a lineup with Pussy Riot, yet the Democrats continue to expend a lot of time, energy and money trying to

Man Up, Mr. Holder
Commentary Magazine, by Peter Wehner    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/11/2014 5:21:36 AM     Post Reply
Attorney General Eric Holder, in a speech to the National Action Network, accused his congressional critics of launching “unprecedented, unwarranted, ugly and divisive” attacks on him and the Obama administration. “Forget about me [specifically]. Look at the way the attorney general of the United States was treated yesterday by a House committee,” Holder said. “What attorney general has ever had to deal with that kind of treatment? What president has ever had to deal with that kind of treatment?” Let’s take these topics in reverse order. What president has been on the receiving end of such ugly and divisive attacks? Try George

Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell battle on the floor
Politico, by Burgess Everett    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/11/2014 4:59:49 AM     Post Reply
The Senate made a historic change to its rules to limit the power of the minority five months ago. But to some senators, it might as well have happened yesterday. The raw feelings still lingering over Democrats’ unilateral change to the Senate’s filibuster rules were on public display on Thursday, when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) bitterly feuded over each others’ leadership. Reid accused the GOP of standing for little other than seeking to “stand around here and do nothing,” while McConnell said Reid had a “behavior problem” for the way he



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Cowboys steal their cattle BACK
in tense showdown over Nevada´s last
rancher: Protesters break federal
blockade as militias threaten to
join fight and pregnant woman claims
she was assaulted by agents

49 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Dan Miller & Meghan Keneally    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/11/2014 10:29:52 AM     Post Reply
The son of the Nevada rancher locked in an increasingly tense land dispute with the federal government, says their cowboys managed to break a blockade and retrieve around 30 head of cattle. Federal agents swooped on Tuesday after Cliven Bundy, dubbed the last remaining rancher in southern Nevada, refused to remove his herd of 900 cows from land he claims has been in his family since 1870. The heavily-armed federal agents, equipped with eight helicopters and backed-up by snipers, surrounded the Bundy ranch after the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) attained a federal court order to confiscate the family´s herd. But

Hillary Clinton Cancels Appearance Where
Benghazi Victim´s Mom, Protestors Await

46 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Barbara Boland    Original Article
Posted By: BaseballFan- 4/11/2014 10:02:18 AM     Post Reply
Hillary Clinton was the planned keynote speaker at the 17th Annual Western Healthcare Leadership Academy in San Diego on April 11 - but she´s cancelled her visit in the midst of planned protests from San Diego locals and military families. Protestors organized by "The Difference Matters" do not want the former U.S. Secretary of State to come because of Clinton´s role in the Benghazi scandal. "She is not welcome here in San Diego by so many of us. We don´t want her here," said Jan Iverson, a local mother and protestor. (Snip) Clinton´s office says she changed plans because of

The five extra words that can
fix the Second Amendment

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by John Paul Stevens    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/11/2014 10:35:30 PM     Post Reply
Following the massacre of grammar-school children in Newtown, Conn., in December 2012, high-powered weapons have been used to kill innocent victims in more senseless public incidents. Those killings, however, are only a fragment of the total harm caused by the misuse of firearms. Each year, more than 30,000 people die in the United States in firearm-related incidents. Many of those deaths involve handguns. The adoption of rules that will lessen the number of those incidents should be a matter of primary concern to both federal and state legislators. Legislatures are in a far better position than judges to assess the

Barack Obama Saves Wife
Michelle From Wardrobe Malfunction,
Marilyn Monroe Moment: Picture

34 replie(s)
US Magazine, by Rachel McRady    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 4/10/2014 7:59:06 PM     Post Reply
Barack Obama got quite the handful on Thursday, April 10, but it was all for a good cause! As the President of the United States was boarding Air Force One with his wife Michelle Obama, a gust of wind blew up her skirt. Barack quickly stepped in and grabbed the First Lady´s billowing skirt to help her avoid a wardrobe malfunction and embarrassing Marilyn Monroe moment. Earlier in the week, another famous lady on the global stage suffered a similar snafu, but no one was around to help her -- not even her prince!

Michelle Obama´s Food Program
Is Non-Nutritious Waste Of Money

32 replie(s)
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 4/10/2014 2:35:20 PM     Post Reply
Big Government: As students flood Twitter with images of inedible slop, it´s clear that Michelle Obama´s government school lunch revamp is a costly failure. It´s time to get the feds out of kids´ lunch boxes. The $12 billion federal student lunch program, which serves 30.7 million kids, is losing participants fast — more than a million just last year, according to a recent Government Accountability Office report. The reason: the first lady´s Healthy Hunger-free Kids Act, an act that has accomplished exactly the opposite of what it claimed it would — leaving hungry, angry, disgusted kids and dumpsters full of wasted

Sunk: Climate change threatens to
flood world´s largest Navy base
warns Gov. Terry McAuliffe

32 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/11/2014 4:08:01 PM     Post Reply
Recently elected Democratic Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe is warning that global warming could raise sea levels high enough to flood the Hampton Roads region, home to the world´s largest naval base, without immediate and “smart decisions.” Addressing an environmental summit this week at the Virginia Military Institute in Lexington, Va., McAuliffe embraced climate change, blamed humans for causing it, and said action is needed now to protect Virginia´s coast from rising ocean levels that will result from global warming. “The first big decision of course is to accept that climate change is real,” he told the group. “I happen to believe in

Stephen Colbert to replace Letterman
26 replie(s)
Entertainment Magazine, by James Hibbard    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 4/10/2014 12:10:39 PM     Post Reply
Official: Stephen Colbert is the new host of CBS’ Late Show. Release: The CBS Television Network today announced that Stephen Colbert, the host, writer and executive producer of the Emmy and Peabody Award-winning “The Colbert Report,” will succeed David Letterman as the host of THE LATE SHOW, effective when Mr. Letterman retires from the broadcast. The five-year agreement between CBS and Colbert was announced by Leslie Moonves, President and CEO, CBS Corporation, and Nina Tassler, Chairman of CBS Entertainment. Letterman, the legendary, critically acclaimed host of the CBS late night series for 21 years, announced his retirement on his April 3 broadcast. Colbert’s

Global solar dominance in sight
as science trumps fossil fuels

26 replie(s)
Telegraph [UK], by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/10/2014 6:08:54 PM     Post Reply
Solar power has won the global argument. Photovoltaic energy is already so cheap that it competes with oil, diesel and liquefied natural gas in much of Asia without subsidies. Roughly 29pc of electricity capacity added in America last year came from solar, rising to 100pc even in Massachusetts and Vermont.[Snip] The technology is improving so fast--helped by the US military--that it has achieved a virtous circle. Michael Parker and Flora Chang, at Sanford Bernstein, say we entering a new order of "global energy deflation" that must ineluctably erode the viability of oil, gas and the fossil fuel nexus over time.

The IRS Scandal Comes Into Focus
26 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by Kimberley A. Strassel    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/11/2014 6:33:53 AM     Post Reply
Nearly a year into the IRS scandal, we still don´t know exactly what happened—though we are finally getting an inkling. That´s thanks to the letter House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp sent this week to the Justice Department recommending a criminal probe of Lois Lerner. The average citizen might be dizzied by the torrent of confusing terms—BOLO lists, Tigta, 501(c)(4)—and the array of accusations that have made up this IRS investigation. Mr. Camp´s letter takes a step back to remind us why this matters, even as it provides compelling new information that goes to motive and method—and clarifies some of

Jeb Bush defends ‘act of love’
26 replie(s)
Politico, by Maggie Haberman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/11/2014 12:53:18 PM     Post Reply
STAMFORD, Conn. — Jeb Bush defended his controversial comments about immigration reform, insisting they were nothing new for him and urging “sensitivity to the immigrant experience.” At a Connecticut Republican party dinner Thursday night, the former Republican governor of Florida did not repeat his remarks from last weekend at his father’s presidential library, when he said that people who come to the United States illegally in search of a better life for their children “broke the law, but it’s not a felony. It’s an act of love.” This time the potential 2016 candidate put it differently. “To be young and

Pelosi: Immigration law
like internment of Japanese

24 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Neil Munro    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/10/2014 3:42:16 PM     Post Reply
The deportation of foreigners living illegally in the United States is similar to the forced internment of ethnic-Japanese Americans in World War II, according to Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi. “I’ll be very honest with you: Looking at the numbers at some point, in terms of how people are treated and deported and families separated and the rest, this has a scent of Japanese internment,” Pelosi told a Politico reporter. “It’s really a black mark,” said Pelosi. Roughly 110,000 ethnic-Japanese immigrants and their American children were detained during World War II after Japan’s sneak attack on Americans in Pearl Harbor. Pelosi also urged Obama

Obama´s politicized, lawless executive branch
24 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by David Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/10/2014 4:29:52 PM     Post Reply
Under the administration of President Obama, as never before in my lifetime, there is reason to be a bit afraid of the federal government. I have written two books documenting Obama´s abuses of power, his assaults on the Constitution, his wars against business and energy, his abominably reckless spending, his divisiveness, his renegade Justice Department, his regulatory expansion, his executive orders, his overall lawlessness, and more. Obama´s conduct concerning Obamacare alone would be enough to get the impeachment wheels rolling for any other president. His flagrant, deliberate lies regarding almost every aspect of that


Post Reply   Close thread 722267





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS