A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


A Lesson From the Scouts´ Own Book
Wall Street Journal, by Nick Gillespie

Original Article

Posted By:MDMuskrat, 2/3/2013 11:48:19 AM

The Boy Scouts of America are in the news again, for the only thing they ever seem to be in the news for anymore: their attitudes toward homosexuals. Next week, the Scouts will hold a vote that´s widely expected to end the blanket ban on gays joining as members or holding adult leadership. By most accounts, the century-old organization will probably let individual chartering groups—many of which are churches—decide whether homosexuals can join and help run their troops.

Comments:
Nick later points out that he kept his two sons from joining the scouts "because of the group´s position on gays". But he´s looking forward to next week´s vote allowing homosexuals to become members and "adult leaders," so he can happily see his grandkids join.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: BarryNo, 2/3/2013 11:59:31 AM     (No. 9155792)

I hope they vote it down. The only reason it´s being pushed is because a bunch of perverted pedophiles have fantasies of running a scout troupe ´their way´. As is usual, people outside of an organization are pushing to either change or destroy it, because of how successful it is.

If they want a scout troupe, make up their own!! Leave the Boy Scouts USA alone!!


Reply 2 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 2/3/2013 11:59:34 AM     (No. 9155793)

Alright all you 8 year old`s about to join the Boy Scouts, get ready to attend a sexual harassment awareness class.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: zephyrgirl, 2/3/2013 12:00:15 PM     (No. 9155794)

I wonder if he´d be so accepting of gay scout leaders if his grandkids are molested by a gay scoutmaster.


Reply 4 - Posted by: DaddyO, 2/3/2013 12:08:37 PM     (No. 9155808)

What if Nick wanted to chaperone a group of 14 year old girls on an overnight camping trip, with no other adult supervision? How would the parents of the girls feel about that, Nick?


Reply 5 - Posted by: melanie, 2/3/2013 12:21:31 PM     (No. 9155829)

Life isn´t all about sex. The time to be a child is so precious. We are cheating them of their innocence by letting activists put their own preferences (perversions?) at the center of everything. There´s nothing wrong with sex, it just shouldn´t be a predominant factor in childhood.


Reply 6 - Posted by: MDMuskrat, 2/3/2013 12:21:34 PM     (No. 9155831)

#3: I think fully-liberated Eagle Scout Gillespie would be alright with that. In fact, I daresay he wouldn´t see it as a molestation, but rather "a valuable lesson in alternative lifestyles." Hey Nick! Do you think they´ll ever have a merit badge for...?


Reply 7 - Posted by: TunnelRat, 2/3/2013 12:24:33 PM     (No. 9155836)

I was with him clear up to the part where he said it was "morally straight" to accept "gays".

They´re not "gays", Nick. They´re homosexuals -- you know: perverts. There´s nothing "morally straight" about male on male anal sex.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: GKC fan, 2/3/2013 12:29:08 PM     (No. 9155851)

Wait til the law suits start in about a year if they do change their policy. We Catholics are still paying....


Reply 9 - Posted by: TexasRose, 2/3/2013 12:42:50 PM     (No. 9155872)

Why shouldn´t we say it´s morally straight to accept gays - that is, in a day when freedom means enslavement, individual rights mean collectivism, investment means taxes, growing economy means recession - down means up, and good means evil!!


Reply 10 - Posted by: AGGW, 2/3/2013 12:49:55 PM     (No. 9155880)

If their policy changes, the sound you hear next week will be my late husband rolling over in his grave. He was so proud of our son achieving Eagle that we buried him with his father´s eagle pin in his lapel.


Reply 11 - Posted by: kono, 2/3/2013 12:58:55 PM     (No. 9155891)

On my honor I will do my best
to do my duty
to God and my country
and to obey the Scout Law,
To help other people at all times;
To keep myself physically strong,
mentally awake,
and morally straight.

(emphasis mine)

If the Boy Scouts make this policy change, they will have to change their Scout Oath. And immeasurable damage will have been done to Americans´ traditional freedom to choose, freely, those with whom they wish to associate... and to establish the criteria for membership in clubs or groups of their own creation.

Make no mistake -- this is definitely tied with the recent trend in colleges to force religious groups (particularly Christian ones) to accept members from other religions, and to let them become officers (and even president) of those groups.

We can already tell, though, that efforts to create enclaves adhering to SHARIA will be treated with far more deference by ´progressives´ and the PC crowd.


Reply 12 - Posted by: beth, 2/3/2013 1:06:05 PM     (No. 9155899)

So he considers his not allowing his sons to be involved because he doesn´t agree with their policy as being noble. However, if this policy passes and parents refuse to let their sons join he will consider those parents close minded. You can´t win with these people, they are a blight on our culture.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: happywarrior, 2/3/2013 1:06:06 PM     (No. 9155900)

They are going to have to change a lot more than just that #12. So sad.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 2/3/2013 1:19:23 PM     (No. 9155920)

No more money from me.
NRA gets another contribution.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Peacekeeper_US, 2/3/2013 1:50:49 PM     (No. 9155966)

Sir Baden Powell, their founder, has turned over in his grave!...so sad.


Reply 16 - Posted by: EllaZella, 2/3/2013 1:50:59 PM     (No. 9155967)

The real issue is that those in power in our society refuse to allow the Scouts, a private organization, to maintain its traditional morality. They are insisting that we, as private citizens, may not place our boys in an organization that holds to traditional morals.

The organization that we want to place our boys in and participate in must change into something we don´t want -- or be destroyed.


Reply 17 - Posted by: HPmatt, 2/3/2013 1:57:52 PM     (No. 9155975)

Just about the only institution not to be corrupted by the left now has enough marxists on the Board to destroy scouts - churches have gone, government has gone, press is gone 0 we´re just now down to ´We the people´ to stand up to the onward march of destruction and decay of the civil society that started in AMerica from true English Common Law.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: LudicrousSextus, 2/3/2013 2:00:33 PM     (No. 9155979)

One wonders if the BSA noticed - what a decade of GLSEN and ´gay-straight alliance´ clubs in schools from kindergarten on up have accomplished...

...which according to the latest CDC stats - is 1000 new adolescent to young adult males A MONTH added to the HIV roles.

So much for ´normal and healthy´, eh?


Reply 19 - Posted by: Starlifter Nav, 2/3/2013 2:49:44 PM     (No. 9156056)

Seems I´m writing an awful lot of letters and Emails these days. Fired off a lengthy explanation to National Hqs why this is their worst idea ever, and why if they agree to it I and numerous other Eagle Scouts with whom I communicate will publicly destroy and return the Award, just as they have publicly destroyed the entity it (once) represented.


Reply 20 - Posted by: woodsto sea, 2/3/2013 3:29:28 PM     (No. 9156105)

He didn´t let his kids join because quite simply he´s an Ass!!! All you have to know is that its been a constant struggle for scouting to keep out Adult homosexual who prey on children. Now Progressives want to make it open season on scouting youth. Why? to destroy Scouting.

When Scouting allows people on its Board that don´t believe in the Scouting oath it invites its own destruction.


Reply 21 - Posted by: TLCary, 2/3/2013 3:41:03 PM     (No. 9156113)

Scouting is NOT a Wilderness Training/Military Prep Club. It is all about principals and building boys who are "morally fit", "reverent", all around good people.

The Camping, the Uniform, The Pine Wood Derby - are all activities to help reach that goal. Boys Scouts are a religious organization, not a camping organization.

(Or at least they were)


Reply 22 - Posted by: BarryNo, 2/3/2013 3:58:40 PM     (No. 9156142)

Please note the article immediately following this one on Lucianne´s; It´s a good measure of how weird and depraved the people pushing this agenda can be.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: reilly, 2/3/2013 4:09:54 PM     (No. 9156160)


Pervert rights trump all.


Reply 24 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 2/3/2013 4:47:10 PM     (No. 9156214)

Sexuality is what they need to ban, homo or otherwise. A person´s sexual preferences are not an issue if they don´t express them.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Starlady, 2/3/2013 5:12:36 PM     (No. 9156248)

My son and I discussed this issue last night because his son just joined cub scouts this year. He will pull my grandson out because in the oath God comes first and this activity is not pleasing to God. He left the Lutheran Church when they approved gay Pastors. I agree with him and think this will be a decision that the Boy Scouts will regret should they approve. The Boy Scouts will go the way that the Girl Scouts went years ago.


Reply 26 - Posted by: lavalette, 2/3/2013 5:19:48 PM     (No. 9156257)

The Wall Street Journal. The Corporate crony capitalism types are completely sucked into this anti-christian madness that´s going on today. They would prefer to be ruled by the communists of the Democratic Party than be asociated with the social conservatives in their own party.


Reply 27 - Posted by: tomanderson61, 2/3/2013 5:34:54 PM     (No. 9156273)

In addition to the great comments above, I´ll throw some more at Mr. GIllespie.

If it´s all about "adaptability", why not NAMBLA members be allowed to join? How about female scoutmasters who have no outdoors experience, but feel they should have the job anyways? How about cross-dressers? How about admitting kids who don´t want to camp but instead want to play flag football all day where "everyone is a winner"?

Absurd? Not any more absurd than admitting gays into a boys program involving alone time with minimal supervision, young impressionable kids, and men who build their whole identities around their penis.

What could go wrong there?


Reply 28 - Posted by: dittohead, 2/3/2013 6:44:43 PM     (No. 9156346)

I am really tired of sexual preference being thrown in my face all the time. I actually don´t care what you do in your own bed rooms, just keep it to yourself - but this is tragic. I think this is a big mistake for many reasons but the greatest is exposing our sons to predators, which we know will be joining for this very reason.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Japanorama, 2/3/2013 8:14:39 PM     (No. 9156434)

No homosexual experiments with my children.


Reply 30 - Posted by: oh-heck, 2/3/2013 9:26:22 PM     (No. 9156552)

In all the discussion of his time in Scout, there was not a mention of sexual activity. That is because there is none. The Boy Scout Handbook begins with a parent´s guide to Abuse. The Scoutmasters are trained to never be alone with a scout. There must always be 2 adults present. Why put sexuality into the picture? The atheists also avoid the Scouts because of the mention of God in the Scout oath and the Pledge of Allegiance.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 2/3/2013 9:40:25 PM     (No. 9156565)

#32, the mention of God in the Scout oath will be the next thing they attack. Just wait and see.


Reply 32 - Posted by: LanieLou, 2/3/2013 11:31:17 PM     (No. 9156691)

Destruction of Christianity & the family unit are high on the agenda for progressives. Promoting homosexuality is a fast track tactic to destroy both. When you have no guiding principles or personal roots, you are a slave, to be used by evil doers. Pray for us.


Reply 33 - Posted by: Twiggy, 2/4/2013 1:29:32 AM     (No. 9156773)

It´s disgusting they are even considering changing their rules. Haven´t we had homos infiltrating every fiber of our being at every turn. Enough is enough. Why is sex being so exploited from young children, our churches, employment, government. Get out of my face.They are not a special group of people just because of who they choose to sleep with.



Post Reply   Close thread 721854




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "MDMuskrat"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "MDMuskrat"



"Me Too" Republicans
Creators Syndicate, by Thomas Sowell    Original Article
Posted By: MDMuskrat- 3/27/2013 8:36:39 AM     Post Reply
Many ideas presented as "new" are just rehashes of old ideas that have been tried before -- and have failed before. So it is no surprise that the recent "Growth and Opportunity Project" report to the Republican National Committee is a classic example of what previous generations called "Me too" Republicanism. These are Republicans who think that the key to winning elections is to do more of what the Democrats are doing. In effect, they say "me too" on issues such as immigration, in hopes of gaining more new votes than they lose by betraying their existing supporters.

University Takes Action
to Punish Student
Fox News, by Todd Starnes    Original Article
Posted By: MDMuskrat- 3/26/2013 10:21:42 AM     Post Reply
A Florida Atlantic University student who filed a complaint against his professor after he was ordered to stomp on the name of Jesus has been brought up on academic charges by the school and may no longer attend class, according to documents obtained by Fox News. The “Notice of Charges” against Ryan Rotela is contrary to a statement the university released late Friday night saying no one had been disciplined as a result of the classroom activity. (snip) Fox News obtained a synopsis of the lesson taught by Deandre Poole, dpoole3@fau.edu

Rebuilding a land of opportunity
Washington Times, by Jim DeMint    Original Article
Posted By: MDMuskrat- 3/22/2013 10:47:40 AM     Post Reply
President Obama and Congress will not solve America’s problems unless the people force them to. Washington is America’s problem. We are the solution. America remains a conservative nation. But the people crave leadership — champions who will stand up to the progressives, take on the liberal media and push back against the Republican leadership when they go wobbly. They are tired of politicians. (snip) As we move ahead, we must remember that there is a distinction between the Republican Party and the conservative movement. National Republican leaders have not advanced a conservative agenda for almost 20 years.

Horse-Slaughter Plant’s Lawyer
Says Opening Three Weeks Away
Bloomberg News, by Alan Bjerga    Original Article
Posted By: MDMuskrat- 3/19/2013 2:01:07 PM     Post Reply
The lawyer for a New Mexico meat plant that wants to be the first to slaughter horses in the U.S. since 2007 says the facility may be operational in three weeks. (snip) The plant may eventually have about 100 employees processing as many as 100 horses a day for export, he said. The company is one of several that have applied to the U.S. Department of Agriculture to slaughter horses, a practice that ended in 2007 after Congress defunded government inspections at the facilities. That measure lapsed in 2011

CPAC turns away Pamela Geller.
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: MDMuskrat- 3/4/2013 10:20:16 PM     Post Reply
CPAC already has earned headlines for narrowing the conservative tent this year. Now, after not inviting Chris Christie to speak, and declining to allow GoProud to participate, CPAC is refusing to allow Pamela Geller to have a booth or rent rooms to conduct events. From her own site, Atlas Shrugs, Pamela writes: (snip) “This year, I applied to speak and was ignored. I tried to get a room for an AFDI event, "The War on Free Speech," and was ignored. So, for the first time in five years, I won´t be at CPAC.”

Congressional Abdication
National Interest Magazine, by Jim Webb    Original Article
Posted By: MDMuskrat- 3/4/2013 10:14:36 AM     Post Reply
IN MATTERS of foreign policy, Congress, and especially the Senate, was designed as a hedge against the abuses exhibited by overeager European monarchs who for centuries had whimsically entangled their countries in misguided adventures. America would not be such a place. The Constitution would protect our governmental process from the overreach of a single executive who might otherwise succumb to the impulsive temptation to unilaterally risk our country’s blood, treasure and international prestige. Congress was given the power to declare war and appropriate funds, thus eliminating any resemblance to European-style monarchies when it came to the presidential war power.

‘A crazy vehicle,’ &c.
National Review Online, by Jay Nordlinger    Original Article
Posted By: MDMuskrat- 2/25/2013 11:00:15 AM     Post Reply
Sequestration is “looming.” Sequestration is, indeed, upon us. I wrote a little about this in the January 28 issue of National Review. The piece was called “Defense Is Different.” Let me give you some comments that people have made, with regard to sequestration — particularly with regard to the defense budget.(snip)America’s Most Miserable Cities. Three of the top ten are in Michigan. Three are in Illinois. And three are in California. Think of that: Of the ten most miserable cities, nine are in three states. The tenth is in New York — is New York City.

A Lesson From the Scouts´ Own Book
Wall Street Journal, by Nick Gillespie    Original Article
Posted By: MDMuskrat- 2/3/2013 11:48:19 AM     Post Reply
The Boy Scouts of America are in the news again, for the only thing they ever seem to be in the news for anymore: their attitudes toward homosexuals. Next week, the Scouts will hold a vote that´s widely expected to end the blanket ban on gays joining as members or holding adult leadership. By most accounts, the century-old organization will probably let individual chartering groups—many of which are churches—decide whether homosexuals can join and help run their troops.

North Dakota Went Boom
New York Times Magazine, by Chip Brown    Original Article
Posted By: MDMuskrat- 2/3/2013 10:49:44 AM     Post Reply
Long before the full frenzy of the boom, you could see its harbingers at the Mountrail County courthouse in Stanley, N.D. Geologists had pored over core samples and log signatures and had made their educated guesses, and now it was the hour of the “landmen,” the men and women whose job was to dig through courthouse books for the often-tangled history of mineral title and surface rights. (Snip)… around seven years ago — driven by technological refinements that have made North Dakota a premier laboratory for coaxing oil from stingy rocks — the state’s Bakken boom began....

Rule Of Law Hurting The West
CNN, by Niall Ferguson    Original Article
Posted By: MDMuskrat- 11/26/2012 5:29:42 PM     Post Reply
Author Niall Ferguson tells CNN laws are becoming more cumbersome and hurting Western economies. (Snip) To me, one of the biggest contrasts between the West and the rest is that things like the rule of law -- regulation, bureaucracy -- are getting more problematic, more burdensome in Western countries, even as they are becoming less burdensome in emerging markets. Stevens: You mean they’re getting in the way of development? Ferguson: Yeah, they really are… one of the arguments I make in my new book, The Great Degeneration, is that the rule of law in the United States has become the

The pros and cons of
the cease fire agreement
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff    Original Article
Posted By: MDMuskrat- 11/22/2012 10:47:06 AM     Post Reply
Let’s take a preliminary look at the advantages and disadvantages of the cease fire agreement, from an Israeli and traditional pro-Western perspective. There are two big advantages. First, the agreement puts an end, at least for now, to the bombardment of Israel. (snip) Now to the disadvantages. First, Hamas won. Why? Because it bombarded Israel and was not crushed for it. And because Israel reportedly agreed to an easing of its blockade of the Gaza Strip. (snip) By pushing for the deal, the Obama administration has demonstrated once again that it is no good friend of Israel.

President Romney
Weekly Standard, by William Kristol    Original Article
Posted By: MDMuskrat- 10/23/2012 11:12:44 AM     Post Reply
Mitt Romney is more than holding his own with Barack Obama tonight. Only two other challengers have done as well debating foreign policy with an incumbent president—Ronald Reagan (snip) [and] Bill Clinton against George H.W. Bush in 1992. Reagan and Clinton won. Romney is now on track to becoming the third challenger to win in the last 32 years—and the first in 80 years to defeat an incumbent who didn't have a primary challenge. Tonight, Romney seems as fully capable as—probably more capable than—Barack Obama of being the next president. He probably will be.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
73 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

65 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

65 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Christians, here´s why we´re
losing our religion

48 replie(s)
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM     Post Reply
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”

Broadcasters worry
about ´Zero TV´ homes

47 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM     Post Reply
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

44 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

42 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

The Secrets of Princeton
40 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Is going gluten-free
healthier for everybody?

33 replie(s)
The Week, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/7/2013 11:28:27 AM     Post Reply
Gluten-free diets are all the rage, but they can be dangerous if not done right. What is gluten? It´s the spongy complex of proteins, found naturally in wheat, rye, and barley, that gives elasticity to dough and allows it to rise. When flour is moistened and either kneaded or mixed into dough, gluten molecules form an elastic, microscopic latticework that traps the carbon dioxide produced when yeast ferments, causing dough to inflate like a hot air balloon. Baking hardens the gluten, which helps the finished product keep its shape. Wheat — and gluten — is ubiquitous in the American diet.


Post Reply   Close thread 721854





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS