A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Senator Rubio’s Immigration
Enforcement Fantasy

PJ Media, by Andrew C. McCarthy

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/30/2013 9:44:36 AM

The silly season is upon us again, which is to say: Washington finds itself in yet another debate over “comprehensive immigration reform.” The core silliness could be heard in the arguments of Marco Rubio, one of four Republicans in the Senate “Gang of Eight” urging a deal that purports to ensure real immigration enforcement in exchange for legalization of status and an ultimate “path to citizenship” for millions of illegal immigrants. Earlier this afternoon, Sen. Rubio was interviewed by Rush Limbaugh. Sen. Rubio admirably insisted, “We need border security.

Comments:
Mr. McCarthy gives an excellent analysis as usual. The last paragraph says it all. If they aren´t enforcing the present laws with 0bama in office they won´t enforce new ones either. It should be left to the states not Washington.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Whamdbambam, 1/30/2013 10:01:50 AM     (No. 9148249)

Perhaps "Rubio" is Cuban for "rube."


Reply 2 - Posted by: wilko, 1/30/2013 10:09:16 AM     (No. 9148272)

The current immigration laws are resting comfortably on the books at this time, slowly gathering dust. Rather than enforce them, the Congress will create new and improved comprehensive laws that pretty much say what the old ones say...no, exactly what the old ones say, and then not enforce those either. No one sees the pattern of this pointless exercise but it´s obvious to those of us who can.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Mass Minority, 1/30/2013 10:17:38 AM     (No. 9148293)

We actually don´t need any more border security to solve the immigration issue. Its actually pretty simple.

1. Accept the fact that too many Americans refuse to take the jobs a lot of illegals do. Like farm workers. We need the labor.

2. Require a work visa for these jobs. Make the card easy to get, like a plane ticket. But only at the country of origin. Quite frankly these visas could be unlimited.

3. Spend the money to set up the database for these visas, open to all employers and law enforcement.

4. Here is the key to the whole thing. Make hiring a worker without a work permit a felony, with a fine severe enough to actually put the business under. There would be no excuse for not checking the employees status, remember #3.

5. No Benefits for work visa holder, no anchor babies either. No change in citizenship process.

The above makes not getting the visa a non issue, it just makes it easier to know whos here. The enforcement is the key. Once employers realize they can, and will, lose there business if they don´t check work status the demand for undocumented workes will dry up fast. Ones without a card will either self deport or aquire the paperwork.


Reply 4 - Posted by: mamafrog, 1/30/2013 10:37:54 AM     (No. 9148348)

If Conservatives savage Marco Rubio on the immigration question they will only further offend the Hispanic portion of the voting public.


Reply 5 - Posted by: QRP, 1/30/2013 10:44:40 AM     (No. 9148362)

Apparently Rubio is a fantasizer, not a deep thinker. Hardly presidential timber.
Perhaps the silver lining is Hilary will probably be better than Obama.


Reply 6 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/30/2013 11:02:11 AM     (No. 9148424)

All this won´t make a difference once Obama and the liberal Democrats get Republican (Stupid) Party political cover to pass their amnesty with a special streamlined path to citizenship for 11 to 20 million illegal aliens who once legalized would be able to bring about another 20 million of their foreign relatives here with a few years.

If that happens within a few years the Democrats will pick up tens of millions of new voters directly and indirectly as a result of the amnesty. With all those new voters, the Democrats will be able to flip States like Arizona, Florida and Texas in their favor much as California is today. The result of that for the Republican (Stupid) Party will be political oblivion for the long-term.

The liberal Democrats will never go along with sending immigration law enforcement to the States as they are all about central control.

Chances are with one party Democrat control across the country, and having to please their new voters, the Democrats will affectively do away with all expensive borderline controls and further liberalize the immigration laws to where just about any alien who comes here can simply stay if they can find a job.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Gallo3, 1/30/2013 11:08:56 AM     (No. 9148444)

Rubio was ´stooged´ by The Spider Schumer, and Citizen McCain.
They cynically picked him for a patsy along racial lines.

He was dumb enough to fall for it.

Rand Paul sits at the head of the class, right now.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 1/30/2013 11:23:39 AM     (No. 9148497)

#3, that is hogwash. Americans are not above any job if the check is right. Part of the reason half of the working class has become part of the welfare state is that employers refuse to pay decent wages to American workers when they can pay Juan and Carlos next to nothing for their labor.

BTW, Rubio does not care about border security or illegal aliens -- Rubio, the career politician, cares about HIS career and he´s willing to take Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin and the rest of us on a ride down the river to do so.


Reply 9 - Posted by: wtm, 1/30/2013 11:33:46 AM     (No. 9148529)

ALL Rehash of 1986 !!!!!!

Dems: Trust us, we will have border enforcement!!! But we want amnesty first !!!

Repubs: Sure !!!

Dems: Suckers !!!!


Reply 10 - Posted by: earlybird, 1/30/2013 11:52:14 AM     (No. 9148565)

I do hope #1 read the article, which deserves a more pithy Reply.

McCarthy points out the folly of the current Republican effort (not just Rubio´s) to look like good guys to the Latino voters by "working with" Democrats like the shifty, mendacious Shumer, on this "comprehensive" reform.

This is an excellent article. Far more important than Jim Nabor´s marriage and the other trivia that seem to be attracting the lightweights this morning.

Put brains in gear and read it.


Reply 11 - Posted by: earlybird, 1/30/2013 11:53:22 AM     (No. 9148566)

PS. Rubio is a politican. An ambitious one. They reside in both parties. The Latino vote is his path to glory, too.



Post Reply   Close thread 721258




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Krauthammer: Obama "Essence Of Exactly
The System That He Denounced And He
Promised He Would Messianically Redeem"
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 11:37:06 AM     Post Reply
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: There´s a larger issue here, which I think you´re overlooking. CHRIS WALLACE: No doubt. KRAUTHAMMER: I just have to get that in. I mean, Obama runs in 2008 as the man who is going to change our politics. You know, he is only going to implement new ideas, he is going to change the way Washington works. And the essence of the corruption he was attacking was the money. So, number one, in ´08, he is the first who refuses public financing for his campaign, he raises a billion dollars. And now what he is doing,

Obama: ‘We Still Waste Money in
All Kinds of Things That Don´t Work’
Weekly Standard, by Jeryl Bier    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 11:11:44 AM     Post Reply
At a Democratic National Committee fund raising event in Atherton, California Thursday morning, President Obama declared that the United States government still needs to get its fiscal house in order: We still waste money in all kinds of things that don´t work, and we have the capacity to shift those dollars into things that do work and that will grow our economy. And we can reduce our deficit, stabilize our debt, and do so without sacrificing the kinds of investments that are going to be required to grow. During his remarks, the president spoke of the

Controversial Preacher Removed
from Diversity Day Program
Fox News, by Todd Starnes    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 11:08:11 AM     Post Reply
Michael Pfleger, the controversial Catholic priest who made racial remarks about Hillary Clinton and defended Louis Farrakhan, has been removed as a keynote speaker at a diversity day event sponsored by a federal government agency. A spokesperson for the Broadcasting Board of Governors told Fox News that Pfleger’s office has been notified that his invitation to address the group has been rescinded. “This is an event that is meant to celebrate inclusiveness and diversity,” spokesperson Lynne Weil told Fox News. “It was deemed by our senior management that it was not appropriate to have him as a speaker.”

Students Want Anti-Gay Priest
Removed from University
Fox News, by Todd Starnes    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 11:04:03 AM     Post Reply
Religious liberty groups are mobilizing to defend the chaplain of George Washington University’s Newman Center after gay students launched an effort to have the priest fired because he preaches against homosexuality and abortion. “It’s discrimination against Catholics,” said Patrick Reilly, president of the Cardinal Newman Society. “Secular colleges are fast becoming a very unsafe place for Catholics who hold true to their faith. This is a very, very sad situation.” Two gay students at George Washington told the GW Hatchet student newspaper that they want Father Greg Shaffer removed from campus

Carney: Obama´s fundraising push for
Pelosi in Calif. a ´traditional exercise´
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Justin Sink    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 10:43:22 AM     Post Reply
White House press secretary Jay Carney on Thursday defended President Obama´s fundraising swing through California, saying that despite "rhetoric from the other side" critical of the president, his push on behalf of Democratic Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was "a traditional exercise." "I think it’s important to note that -- because you’ve seen a lot of rhetoric from the other side suggesting that there is something wrong with that -- that Republican leaders in the House and the Senate have been out raising money for Republican candidates;

   

 

  


 
First key fight in immigration battle
is what to name the reform bill
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Molly K. Hooper    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 10:39:00 AM     Post Reply
One of the first political issues negotiators must tackle in crafting an immigration reform bill is among the most important: what to name it. It’s a decision that will bruise egos, create legacies and deeply affect subsequent messaging battles. “Every time the bill is mentioned in the press, you either have a brand that´s positive or a brand that doesn´t mean anything or even hurts you,” said Frank Sharry, the executive director of the pro-immigration reform group America’s Voice. The wrong name, he warned, could doom a good bill. “If there´s not a

Psychiatrist warned campus
police about Aurora shooter
a month before mass murder
Hot Air, by Ed Morrissey    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 10:05:18 AM     Post Reply
In a revelation that may have Colorado voters rethinking their state’s push on gun control, court documents revealed that the mass shooting in Aurora that killed 12 and injured 70 more could have been prevented by law enforcement. The psychiatrist for suspect, James Holmes, had warned campus police that Holmes was dangerous and homicidal a month before the shooting took place. Lynne Fenton even told the police that Holmes had begun to stalk and threaten her, and yet no action was apparently taken: A University of Colorado psychiatrist told campus police a month before the Aurora

Rep. Peter King attacks Sen.
Marco Rubio for voting against
Sandy funding
Washington Times, by Seth McLaughlin    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:58:55 AM     Post Reply
Rep. Peter King of New York on Friday cast Sen. Marco Rubio as a hypocrite for voting against the the Hurricane Sandy relief package and expressed disbelief that the Florida senator would then turn around and try to raise campaign money in the region. Mr. King questioned how Mr. Rubio could vote against the $60 million in relief for New York and New Jersey when Florida has received loads of federal money for Hurricane victims. “Guys like Marco Rubio of Florida, with all the money that you people have gotten in Florida over the years, with every hurricane

Attorney General Eric Holder:
Jail time for blacks is too long
Washington Times, by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:53:14 AM     Post Reply
Attorney General Eric Holder expressed “concern” Thursday evening that black men are unfairly served with longer prison sentences than white men and that America’s prison system demands overhaul. “Too many people go to too many prisons for far too long for no good law enforcement reason,” Mr. Holder said, in remarks to the Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network in New York, Politico reported. “It is time to ask ourselves some fundamental questions about our criminal justice system. … It is time to examine our systems and determine what truly works.” Mr. Holder said in the Politico report

TV news ´lies´ about
Obama, ex-speechwriter says
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:48:55 AM     Post Reply
President Obama and other Washington politicians are getting a bum rap on TV news as money-grubbers and power-grabbers, views the president´s former top speechwriter calls lies, especially those aimed at his former boss. Jon Favreau told students at Harvard University´s Institute of Politics that TV portrays political leaders wrongly, and that the public ends up with a bad view of those in power. "I think that a lot of people turn on the news today, a lot of young people, and they hear people tell them that every motivation of every politician on either

   

 



 
Obama has “no coherent
message” for the Arab world
Washington Examiner, by Sean Higgins    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:42:23 AM     Post Reply
Joyce Karam, Washington correspondent for pan-Arabic daily Al-Hayat, offers a sobering assessment on the Al-Arabiya website of the current administrations efforts in the post-”Arab Spring” Middle East. She begins by noting a how a minor recent diplomatic walkback highlights the White House’s contradictory policy: It was only fitting that the U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry announces another traditional trip to the Middle East on the same day that the U.S. embassy in Cairo withdraws its tweet advancing the case for Egyptian Comedian Bassem Youssef as he faces intimidation from the Mursi government.

Democrats have doubts
about Obamacare too
Washington Examiner, by Brian Hughes    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:38:46 AM     Post Reply
President Obama is eager to build public support for his health care overhaul in the few months remaining before its implementation, but waning enthusiasm from Democrats threatens his effort right out of the gate. Two-thirds of Democrats now believe Obama´s health care reforms will either hurt them personally or have no effect on their daily lives, a Quinnipiac University poll released Thursday shows. In comparison, just 27 percent of Democratic respondents said the reforms would help them. The president has long struggled to convince independent and Republican-leaning voters that his health care blueprint would lower premiums and expand insurance coverage.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

63 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
58 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

49 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

38 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

37 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

White House Blames Jobs
Numbers on Sequester

36 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM     Post Reply
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look

The Secrets of Princeton
34 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for

Obama Budget to Cap Retirement
Accounts at $3 Million

30 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 9:40:39 PM     Post Reply
The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts. According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals "to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving." "The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per

   

Post Reply   Close thread 721258





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS