 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
The coming collapse of the abortion lobby
Fox News, by Dr. Charmaine Yoest
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 1/26/2013 6:08:40 AM
|
| Forty years after Roe v. Wade, a powerful shift is taking place within Big Abortion. What abortion advocates could not win through choice, they intend to impose through coercion. Even Time magazine recently acknowledged on their cover that, for those so inclined to celebrate Roe’s anniversary, the rejoicing over abortion on demand should be tinged with concern. On January 14th Time asked “What Choice?” and then answered their own question: “40 years ago, abortion rights activists won an epic victory with Roe v. Wade,” the cover noted and then concluded: “They’ve been losing ever since.”
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
ruready?, 1/26/2013 6:32:13 AM (No. 9140055)
A wonderful article. Any news that our nation is turning back to God is like a drink of cool water in a desert land.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
arkfamily, 1/26/2013 6:41:58 AM (No. 9140068)
You know there is something really wrong or sick about a society that defends the right to have a baby killed.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Japanorama, 1/26/2013 6:42:41 AM (No. 9140069)
55,000,000 American kids have been aborted. One of them might have cured the disease that will kill you someday.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
jsulman, 1/26/2013 6:55:29 AM (No. 9140079)
What is amazing is how tone deaf the Dems are. This can be seen in their latest convention where abortion was one of the primary platforms that they put forth. They cannot imagine how appalling it is for many Americans to put the killing of a baby in the womb as the most important reason for supporting a party. I think that if the Repubs ever quite listening to the stupid non-social/moral issues members of their party and came strongly and rationally against abortion as Reagen did we would win on the issue. We do not even have to run on an overturn of Roe v Wade. Simple issues like parental consent, waiting periods for abortions and alternatives presented to those seeking abortions would win the day since most Americans are for such things.
The problem is most establishment republicans are so afraid of the issue that they do not speak out as they should so it is left to the nuts Aiken to do so, and we see where that has gotten us.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
kanphil, 1/26/2013 7:19:30 AM (No. 9140099)
There is no question that we were a more moral nation before the SCOTUS up and declared a right that nobody had sued for. One problem we face is rooting out all the hidden sources of funding for Planned Parenthood. We were avid supporters of Susan G Komen March for Life, for example, until we learned that hidden deep in their agenda was money donation to Planned Parenthood. Talk about a contradiction! A March for Life donating to a death dealing ooutfit like PP! The State of Texas, among others is in the process of withdrawing any funding to PP.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
pgvoisin, 1/26/2013 7:23:10 AM (No. 9140103)
Let´s talk "cold-blooded murder", shall we?
Abortion has been responsible for 55,000,000 deaths in this country over the last 4 decades. People killed those little ones not guns. They were all "Pro-Choice" or "Pro-Death" advocates.
We don´t need more "Gun Control", we need "Abortion Control"!
Wake up America!
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Zarin, 1/26/2013 7:26:52 AM (No. 9140107)
Yet please note that this is one issue that apparently helped Obama win & the Dems win the Senate. Recall how their campaigns proclaimed that any Republican or Conservative would deny all women their ´right´ to ´reproductive freedom.´
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Mr. Hanky, 1/26/2013 7:46:29 AM (No. 9140127)
Amazing that the Dems find the right to an abortion in the Constitution and anything short of free abortion on demand is a limit to that right. Yet they want to ban the right to bear arms, which actually is in the Constitution...you know, for the children...
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Bpl40, 1/26/2013 8:14:55 AM (No. 9140161)
The ultimate irony, which is lost on Democrats is that they pursue these policies under the slogan "It´s for the children". Strange!!
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
sorosisbehindit, 1/26/2013 8:46:27 AM (No. 9140221)
Thanks for posting this ray of hope for this weary pro-life warrior to read! I wonder if the libs will regret their "choice" when social security collapses under the weight of the baby boomers with a significantly thinned out generation to follow? The pro-life debate of the future will be whether Obamacare will be allowed to withhold medical care to let the broken down old people die off, which will save taxpayers money.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
miceal, 1/26/2013 8:51:30 AM (No. 9140227)
They advocate the murder of our most precious resource and attack any who call out their evil. From the very rock bottom of my heart, I pray God can forgive "them" because I NEVER WILL!
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Travis Mcgee, 1/26/2013 9:14:14 AM (No. 9140255)
This is especially salient given the new hysteria regarding gun control and demonizing the NRA. At an organizational level who is directly responsible for the greatest loss of human life; Planned Parenthood or the NRA.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
bgarrett, 1/26/2013 9:14:28 AM (No. 9140257)
I consider myself as conservative but wonder: "If abortion is outlawed, what will happen to the young girls who will do it anyway in the alley with a coat hanger?" Because they WILL
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
spengler, 1/26/2013 9:23:03 AM (No. 9140266)
Abortion is no more than institutional modern Moloch worship.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Keekng, 1/26/2013 9:23:45 AM (No. 9140268)
40+ years ago, we adopted two boys. One of them is now a MD and the other is a Paramedic-Firefighter. If Roe v. Wade had occured a few years earlier they might never have been born. What a loss to humanity that would have been.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
ann, 1/26/2013 9:32:06 AM (No. 9140277)
#14....55 MILLION murdered babies......and this is your only response?......words fail me......I have trouble buying your ´conservative´ label....this is the same propaganda used 40 years ago....not very original.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
miceal, 1/26/2013 9:33:35 AM (No. 9140279)
May God bless you and your Children #16.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
donnaclaire, 1/26/2013 9:34:32 AM (No. 9140280)
To these pro-abortion activists, what´s 60,000,000 dead babies? - just a drop in the bucket. Excuse the ´pun´ but it was intended. Their goals and ambitions are indeed chilling, horrific and sad beyond words.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
farmwife, 1/26/2013 9:39:33 AM (No. 9140285)
What all those abortion advocates refuse to acknowledge is that we have come a long way down the road. When this decision was handed down, it was understand there would never be taxpayer funding for abortion. Now most abortions are funded by taxpayers in one way or another.
Next up on that slippery slope, the option of having an abortion will become the duty to have an abortion with the government deciding who will be undergoing the procedure.
Abortion is evil. And people who promote it should be called out at every turn.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Freeloader, 1/26/2013 9:59:21 AM (No. 9140311)
Re #14...There are numerous felony laws on the books, state and federal, prohibiting aggravated assault, burglary, motor vehicle theft, forgery, arson, murder etc. Yet these crimes are still committed on a daily basis. Therefore, should society simply disregard these laws?
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
krause, 1/26/2013 10:10:44 AM (No. 9140324)
There is no ´choice´ for the baby, is there? PP and NARAL should, if they want to be honest, start using the term ´birth control´ because that is what abortion is, in most cases.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
gusman, 1/26/2013 10:23:07 AM (No. 9140343)
Here is how you win on the issue at federal level - stop making it a federal issue. Federal government has NO reason to be discussing, legislating and funding abortion. Republicans should simply tell libs you are right it is none of the federal governments business what you do with your body therefor we are not going to do anything about it including funding it. Say it is a state and local issue where individuals have more say and pull with their law maker. Same goes with gays!
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Ruhn, 1/26/2013 10:37:06 AM (No. 9140412)
The article uses an apt analogy of the abortion lobby and the Soviet bloc: the latter eventually collapsed under the shaky foundation of its own lies and the indefensibility of its basic arguments in application.
But if we are to the outcomes post-Soviet collapse and the pending collapse of the abortion lobby, we must consider where pro-abortionists will migrate to. Communists didn´t go away. They eventually scuttled over to the environmental/AGW cabal to push a statist, anti-capitalist agenda. Likewise, pro-abortionists will re-locate to kindred spirits in coercive, statist entities like CAP, American Bridge, etc. to continue their agenda under a different guise, (i.e. health care).
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
bluefindad, 1/26/2013 11:01:52 AM (No. 9140457)
Thanks so much for posting this uplifting article.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 1/26/2013 11:03:20 AM (No. 9140460)
I´ve heard this kind of jibber jabber every day of my adult life just as I´ve heard the hoots and clicks that gay marriage is never going to happen, Unions are being broken and the Democrats are going the way of the Dodo.
This article is for people who need solace as they whistle past the graveyard.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
John318, 1/26/2013 11:15:57 AM (No. 9140481)
"And with all deceivableness of un-righteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." 2 Thess.2:10-12 The only way that God will remove the delusion is America acknowledges its Sin and repents. Do you really think that is going to happen? If anyone cannot see the judgment that we are under these days they are those that have believed the lies we have been promoting for decades.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
marthaville, 1/26/2013 11:16:27 AM (No. 9140483)
If Planned Parenthood is really so necessary to women because they provide primary care to these women, and since Planned Parenthood claims this is their primary reason for existence, they should just stop performing abortions. Plain and simple.
Of course we know they are liars beyond belief. Their president is Cecile Richards, daughter of Ma Richards of Texas fame. Perhaps she couldn´t continue to be paid $400K per year without the profit they derive from federal government funded 333,000 abortions per year.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
ocjim, 1/26/2013 11:18:20 AM (No. 9140487)
More mandatory ultrasound laws. Let the women see for themselves on the scopes and then make an informed choice whether to believe their own eyes or the Leftist lies about it not being murder. And let´s not allow the Left to conflate abortion or the day after pill with ´´family planning.´´ The Left loves to play with the language in order to bamboozle, BUT, family planning is taking preconception steps, not post conception action.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
capt scurvey, 1/26/2013 11:20:30 AM (No. 9140493)
Fortunately, most all of the victims were little liberals, taken out before they could breed or vote. Without Roe, Gore would have most certainly won the White House...
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
arcady, 1/26/2013 11:30:41 AM (No. 9140514)
55 million! We´re giving the European and Asian socialists and communists a run for their money with our own version of government sanctioned murder...
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
tomanderson61, 1/26/2013 11:34:26 AM (No. 9140524)
#30, such ultrasound laws might save a few lives, and I welcome that, but it won´t really make much of a dent. You would be forcing a medical person to force someone to look at something, which their heart will not be into doing when the person is resistant. Nowadays, EVERY woman except maybe a young teen knows EXACTLY what the baby looks like at what stage and she can likely feel it moving around even at 3 months. Cold blooded freaks that have abortions will just say, yep, I saw it, now go ahead with the procedure.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
gator, 1/26/2013 1:02:57 PM (No. 9140707)
Just think of number of gang-bangers, welfare entitlement payouts, deadbeats, new democrat voters and babies having babies there would be today if abortion were illegal. And most would be dead before they were 25 anyway.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
jfodoch, 1/26/2013 1:14:58 PM (No. 9140731)
I may be showing how out of touch I am with this question, but how expensive would it be to furnish birth control pills to those who can´t afford them but request them? Administered by local county health departments. Or maybe better, an IUD?
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
peterfleming, 1/26/2013 1:26:40 PM (No. 9140748)
Turning abortion into a tax paid high speed industry was as harmful and sending our kids to die is some damn remote desert we´ll never visit. Desolate. Killing thousands of babies on an assembly line. Abortion welfare is horrifying. Kids abandoning caution because of abortion welfare. Tax payers ready to cover your mistakes. What a mess. Socialism, the State, communism, in any form does not work.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Caveman, 1/26/2013 1:43:49 PM (No. 9140775)
New bumper sticker.
ABORTION -- ´´It´s for the children!´´
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Javelin, 1/26/2013 1:54:24 PM (No. 9140790)
I am respectful of those who couch their pro-life arguments in religious terms. I sometimes do, as well. However, I have found that citing science (blood typing, DNA, ultra sound) is more effective with many people, including religious people, who don´t like to acknowledge the moral aspects of their actions or political positions. A few people have hesitated - and some may have had occasion to alter their view - when confronted with "science" rather than faith.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
raphaela, 1/26/2013 2:06:46 PM (No. 9140807)
#14, what makes you think that abortion clinics are any better than back alley abortions? Read the Grand Jury report on Kermit Gosnell and his staff. Or go to Lifesite News and read about the unsanitary and septic conditions of those clinics in operation today. I bet you wouldn´t want to clip your toenails in places like that.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
belwhatter, 1/26/2013 2:19:10 PM (No. 9140834)
I´ve heard say that this is the legacy of eugenicist Margaret Sanger, and was primarily designed to elimnate black populations. I think if I were a black person this idea would not have much appeal.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
FormerDem, 1/26/2013 2:21:01 PM (No. 9140837)
great article. The abortion lobby is actively and brazenly pivoting away from choice to coercion (approx paraphrase). thanks OP
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
thatsomewhereplace, 1/26/2013 3:09:20 PM (No. 9140914)
One-sixth of the USA has been murdered in vitro. Potential tax payers and heaven knows we need more tax payers and social security payers. It amazes me that the money mongrels of the dem party, who search for everyone elses money, don´t see their folly by endorsing, since 1973, aborting potential tax payers. Now, my example is horrid. I in no way support abortion. It sickens me to think 55 million innocent lives have been snuffed out. Now those of you Lucianne fans born after Jan, 1973. You do realize that your mother could have snuffed your life out, legally? You were on the do or don´t ledge of being exterminated because...now in the case of rape or incest...both are punishable crimes. I don´t know if there have been many prosecutions for the rape or family molestations. It´s all been a word game with pro aborts. Refine this. refine that so that we eventually lose the meaning of abortion. I fervently pray that I see the end of abortion. The haters have to lose. Repulsive haters.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
4Justice, 1/26/2013 4:33:14 PM (No. 9141037)
I am no fan of abortion and would never have one. But I think the biggest problem with the issue is that it never stayed the way it was originally intended...i.e. "making it legal, safe and RARE" and only allowed in the first trimester (unless the life of the woman is in danger). Instead, the left pushed it almost into a religion. They turned it into a form of birth control and pushed it not only past the 2nd trimester but all the way to "partial birth" abortion with some even advocating "post birth abortion", like P. Singer. While I feel all potential for life is a gift from God, I can accept that people´s beliefs differ. So, if abortion is going to be legal, then we should limit it to the first trimester before it´s fully developed. But it should be state regulated and education required to discourage it. We can make it rare without outlawing it outright. We just need to discredit the left´s pro-murder agenda.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
sorosisbehindit, 1/26/2013 4:35:13 PM (No. 9141041)
#38 In my case, I had no knowledge of, or opinion about abortion until the day in the early 80s when I saw the film "Silent Scream" on public television. When I saw the ultrasound of that little baby moving around in the womb to avoid the instrument that was invading its space, and then the open mouth...in that moment I became a pro-life advocate. But over the years as Bible verses have popped up that speak so powerfully on the subject, it is difficult to stay with science alone. Proverbs 31:8-9
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
dman, 1/26/2013 5:12:17 PM (No. 9141079)
Time for "prenatal emancipation". Take care of mom for nine months; then give baby to a couple who´ll love and appreciate it. The recent flap with Putin over Russian adoption - not to mention the cost of adoption these days - should remind us how precious all children are.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
octrojan, 1/26/2013 5:30:36 PM (No. 9141102)
I´m as pro-life as anyone but I have to say: the Dems made abortion one of the centerpieces...and they won the Presidency during a very stagnant economy.
So I´m forced to conclude that the strategy of picking off a few groups--dominating blacks, Hispanics, unmarried women, gays, muslims (about 2% of the vote but helpful when you only won by 3-4%) was helped by their pro-abortion strategy. It kept young unmarrieds on the plantation, got millions of Hollywood money flowing in (which they wouldn´t have gotten with a pro-life platform)...meanwhile pro-lifers sat on their hands because mittens or williard or "the Mormon" wasn´t Christian or conservative enough.
So this time around, it worked for the Dems.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
Crasher, 1/26/2013 5:41:24 PM (No. 9141117)
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
Crasher, 1/26/2013 5:48:40 PM (No. 9141125)
When I see that there have been at least 55,000,000 abortions that means that 27,500,000+ women have been denied their reproductive rights because they have been denied their right to trial by jury before getting a death sentence.
Men should also beware as 27,500,000 men were also denied their right to trial by jury before getting a death sentence.
How many who push for abortion want to do away with the death penalty for murderers?
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
pearlyjo, 1/26/2013 5:58:43 PM (No. 9141136)
"Safe, legal and rare." Riiigghhhttt. Let´s cut to the chase folks: abortion is big money. BIG money. It´s not about helping women or helping children or helping society or any of that other clap trap. It´s big money. They prey upon people (men included) at one of the toughest times of their lives. Think of it as impulse buying at its worst, only there´s not returning your purchase if you are unhappy with it.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
M Stuart, 1/26/2013 10:57:15 PM (No. 9141476)
I simply don´t believe this article.
If this is winning, I´d hate to see losing.
I also don´t see where this is coming from when 3 out of 4 Christian kids leave the church after leaving home. crossexamined.org has ammunition to help kids overcome the anti-Christian bias.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Feds block UMass from releasing alleged bomber´s records
|
|
Boston Herald, by John Zaremba, Chris Cassidy*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 3:15:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Federal education officials today slammed the door shut on UMass Dartmouth´s appeal to release academic and financial records of alleged Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, according to a letter received by the Herald. "From the limited information you provided, it appears that the academic and financial records that have been requested would be protected by FERPA, and that the University may not release them without the consent of the student," wrote Dale King, director of the Family Policy Compliance Office for the U.S. Department of Education. (See full text of letter at right.)
|
Plan falls through to bury Tamerlan Tsarnaev at a state prison
|
|
Boston Globe, by Wesley Lowery
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 3:07:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WORCESTER — Police and officials at the funeral home where Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s body is being held say that a plan has fallen apart to bury Tsarnaev at a state prison. According to two officials at the Graham Putnam Mahoney Funeral Parlors with knowledge of the plan, the plan was hatched on Monday, and police from the city where the prison is located met with funeral home officials Tuesday. The plan, which called for moving the body to the prison during the early morning hours, fell apart sometime Tuesday, the officials said.
|
Whistle-blower questions military response amid Benghazi attack
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 12:47:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Republican Rep. Darrell Issa said Wednesday, as the oversight committee he chairs launched into a high-profile hearing on the Benghazi attacks, that the whistle-blowers giving their version of events are "actual experts" on what happened -- who could challenge the administration´s narrative. As the hearing began, one whistle-blower questioned Wednesday why more military assets were not deployed sooner during the Benghazi terror attack. Mark Thompson, a former Marine and official with the State Department´s Counterterrorism Bureau, said he was rebuffed by the White House when he asked for a specialized team -- known as a FEST team --
|
|
Mitt on Marriage
|
|
American Spectator, by Aaron Goldstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 6:23:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney got under the craw of the liberal intelligentsia concerning his remarks about marriage during his commencement address to graduates at Southern Virginia University last month: This is a promise: “Launch out into the deep, and your nets will be filled.” How do you do that? Well, getting married is one way to launch into the deep. I’m so glad I found Ann when I was still so young. Combining your life with another person, particularly someone—men and women as different as we are, this combination is tremendously challenging and enormously rewarding.
|
|
Which Lives Matter to the Media
|
|
Commentary Magazine, by Jonathan S. Tobin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 6:15:39 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Last month, the American media had a brief moment of accountability when many in the press and broadcast networks acknowledged that they had largely ignored the case of Kermit Gosnell. The trial of the murderous Philadelphia abortionist flew below the radar for weeks. But some journalists were willing to fess up to the fact that their lack of interest in a sensational crime had something to do with their lack of comfort in discussing a case that might throw a shadow on an issue most in the media see as pitting an enlightened advocacy of “choice”
|
|
What if Al Gore had won?
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Noemie Emery
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 6:06:58 AM
Post Reply
|
|
It started with reports that former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra O´Connor had second thoughts on the court´s decision to rule on the issue of George W. Bush v. Albert G. Gore, followed by dedication of the George W. Bush Presidential Library in Texas. Together, those events brought on a flutter of Gore nostalgia, a longing of sorts for his alternative presidency; the dream one that never took place. Since 2001 it had been the destination of choice in liberal fantasies, wherein Saddam Hussein was contained without bluster or bloodshed, terrorist attacks were derailed
|
How Did Progressive Journalists Get Pigford So Wrong?
|
|
Atlantic, by Conor Friedersdorf
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 6:03:48 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Dan Foster, a young staffer at National Review, published a 2010 story about a class-action lawsuit against the federal government that resulted in "the waste of billions of dollars" and "systemic fraud implicating top federal officials." He wrote that the scandal touched President Obama himself, that countless payouts were made to people falsely claiming racial discrimination, and that more fraud was likely in successor lawsuits filed on behalf of women and Hispanics. Two days after the National Review story appeared online, Nancy Scola, a progressive journalist, commented on the same suit at The American Prospect. "This is one of those times
|
Dem to Judge: Go Easy on Jackson Jr., the ‘Highlight of Our Karaoke Nights’
|
|
Washington Free Beacon, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 5:57:25 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Rep. Marcia Fudge (D., Ohio) has asked a federal judge to show leniency in the sentencing of former Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D., Ill.), describing him as the “highlight of our karaoke nights” in a letter, the Huffington Post reports: “Not only is he highly intelligent, he is charming and entertaining,” Fudge wrote. “When things got tough or extremely difficult on the House floor, we could count on Jesse to bring levity to an otherwise daunting situation with a bad joke or a one-man skit. Jesse was the highlight of our karaoke nights
|
Lauryn Hill Blames Slavery as She´s Jailed for $500,000 Unpaid Tax Bill
|
|
International Business Times [UK], by Dominic Gover
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 5:50:39 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Reclusive soul superstar Lauryn Hill has been jailed over an enormous unpaid tax bill. Fugees singer Hill, 37, was sentenced to three months´ jail followed by three months´ home confinement for failing to pay $500,000 to the taxman in the United States. Hill claimed the sum was outstanding because she had "withdrawn from society" after alleged threats against her family. She was imprisoned after failing to pay the amount within the stipulated two-week timeframe. During her trial, Hill was ordered by the judge in Newark, New Jersey to undergo counselling because of her conspiracy theories -
|
As Midterms Loom, Democrats Worry About Health Law
|
|
New York Times, by Jackie Calmes
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 5:24:48 AM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — As the administration struggles to put in place the final, complex piece of President Obama’s signature health care law, an endeavor on a scale not seen since Medicare’s creation nearly a half-century ago, Democrats are worried that major snags will be exploited by Republicans in next year’s midterm elections. Many Democrats also want to see a more aggressive and visible president to push the law across the country. This week Mr. Obama is returning to the fray to an extent unseen since he signed the law in 2010, including a White House event
|
|
Nightmare of rape & torture
|
|
New York Post, by Erin Calabrese*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 5:21:38 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Three kidnapped young women were starved, repeatedly raped — and then beaten when they got pregnant — in a basement Cleveland dungeon run by three twisted brothers, law-enforcement sources said yesterday. The tortured victims were imprisoned in a dilapidated, white-clapboard home with chains mounted to the ceiling for about 10 years before finally escaping Monday evening. Michelle Knight, 32, Amanda Berry, 26, and Gina DeJesus, 23, were treated as sex slaves — kept chained and taped in separate rooms, sources told the local ABC affiliate. They were also seen naked and on dog leashes in the back yard, according to USA Today.
|
|
Clinton’s Republican Guard
|
|
PJ Media, by Andrew C. McCarthy
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/8/2013 5:15:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
With each new revelation, what has always been obvious becomes more pronounced: the State Department’s self-proclaimed final word on the Benghazi Massacre, the risibly named “Accountability Review Board” investigation, is a fraud. Yet, like the rest of the Obama administration’s obstructive wagon-circling, the ARB’s report continues serving its intended purpose: to thwart efforts to hold administration officials accountable. Even on Fox News, which has been admirably dogged covering a scandal the Obamedia has done its best to bury, the refrain is heard: How could the ARB report be a whitewash when its investigation was run by such Washington eminences
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Hillary Clinton — culpable for Benghazi from beginning to end
|
|
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/7/2013 5:14:14 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When it first became clear that the CIA’s Benghazi talking points had been altered, many of us viewed the White House as the prime suspect. After all, it served President Obama’s political purposes to claim, at the height of a political campaign in which he was taking credit for the fall of al Qaeda, that the death of a U.S. ambassador was down to spontaneous outrage over a video, rather than pre-planned terrorism. It turns out, however, that the State Department was the prime culprit. It was State that pushed back hard against the original talking points.
|
Republican probe of Benghazi attacks turns to Hillary Clinton
|
|
Washington Post, by Philip Rucker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/8/2013 6:52:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Republican lawmakers, who have spent months seeking to tie President Obama to last year’s deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, are increasingly focusing their probe on a new target: former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton. The GOP-led investigation of the Sept. 11, 2012, assaults that killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others now centers heavily on the State Department and whether officials there deliberately misled the public about the nature of the assault. Three State Department officials are scheduled to testify before a House committee on Wednesday about the Benghazi attack and its aftermath.
|
Turning on Obama
|
|
Amerian Spectator, by Ross Kaminsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/7/2013 6:19:30 AM
Post Reply
|
|
If ponies rode men and grass ate cows, And cats were chased into holes by the mouse … If summer were spring and the other way round, Then all the world would be upside down. Once in a long while, an event evokes one of my favorite historical images: the British Army band, at Lord Cornwallis’ surrender at Yorktown which sealed the Americans’ revolutionary victory, playing “The World Turned Upside Down.” In this case, the event is the dramatic change over the past two weeks
|
Seattle to melt buyback guns into peace bricks
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: maggie2u- 5/7/2013 1:13:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Seattle Police Department collected more than 700 guns during a buyback in January, and now city officials have a plan for what to do with them. Mayor Mike McGinn is expected to announce Tuesday that they´ll be melted into bricks carrying messages of peace, and the bricks will be placed around the city. The buyback program was announced a month after last December´s elementary school massacre in Newtown, Conn., by city leaders sick of hearing about gun violence. Private sponsors including Amazon.com contributed tens of thousands of dollars
|
Sanford gets second chance: On political scrapheap 4 years ago, ex-governor wins 1st district seat
|
|
Post & Courier [Charleston, SC], by Glenn Smith*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/8/2013 12:59:28 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Gov. Mark Sanford completed the trail to political redemption Tuesday with a win over Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch to reclaim his old seat in Congress. Sanford defeated Colbert Busch 54 percent to 45 percent, according to full unofficial results. Turnout was heavier than expected, with about 32 percent of the district’s 455,702 registered voters casting ballots. Sanford, who has never lost an election, returns to the 1st District seat he held for three terms from 1995-2001. It’s a remarkable comeback for a man many pundits had written off after his highly publicized affair with an Argentine
|
A new ‘Dawn’ at ABC: Newsman becomes newswoman
|
|
New York Post, by Tara Palmeri
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:26:11 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Top ABC News editor Don Ennis walked into his Manhattan office on Friday in a “little black dress” and a brunette bobbed wig and announced to colleagues that from now on, he would like to be known as Dawn. The 49-year-old father of three said he’s splitting from his wife of 17 years to become a woman, or Dawn Stacey Ennis, as she is now known on her governmental records. “Today I begin anew,” she wrote on her Facebook timeline, where she debuted a flirty new profile picture. “Please understand: This is not a game of
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee: Constitution implies a right to health care, education
|
|
Washington Times, by Douglas Ernst
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/7/2013 8:22:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee took to the House floor Monday night and implied that the right to health care and education exists in the Constitution. Ms. Jackson Lee, Texas Democrat, also made the case that the moral authority for such services is also derived from the Declaration of Independence. “One might argue that education and health care fall into those provisions of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” she said. Ms. Jackson Lee added, “I think that what should be continuously emphasized is the president’s leadership on one single point: that although health care was not
|
Mark Sanford wins South Carolina special election
|
|
Washington Post, by Rachel Weiner
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: supersid- 5/7/2013 8:55:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Mark Sanford has won the South Carolina special election in a competitive race for what in normal circumstances is a safe Republican seat. The former governor beat Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch, the sister of comedian Stephen Colbert Busch, for the state’s 1st congressional district. The AP called the race for Sanford early in the evening, with the Republican leading Colbert Busch 54 percent 46 percent.
|
Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News, a persistent voice of media skepticism on Benghazi
|
|
Washington Post, by Paul Farhi
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/7/2013 11:01:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
From the start, the Obama administration’s account of what happened in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11 last year didn’t quite square for Sharyl Attkisson. So the veteran CBS News reporter dug in, and kept digging. The result: Attkisson has been a persistent voice of news-media skepticism about the government’s story. On the air and online, Attkisson has questioned the administration’s timeline and its response. (Snip) While other media, particularly Fox News, have been similarly skeptical about the official narrative about Benghazi, Attkisson and CBS might put the story in a different light. As a much-decorated reporter from a news
|
Dem Sen: Second Amendment Not Meant For Citizens To Take Up Arms Against Government
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/7/2013 9:28:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) on states nullifying federal gun laws: I mean, let´s look at the context of nullification. Nullification was last used by Southern states to try to eviscerate Civil Rights legislation, to try to prevent states from basically enforcing desegregation and frankly, I think history will look back on this round of nullification as kindly as it did on the last round. It is laughable also because it is a total bastardization of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment is not an absolute right, not a God given right, always had conditions upon
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|