He is SO boring.

And who’s afraid of Vermont?

HA HA HA !!! Great conclusion!

Note to author: an "assault weapon ban" has already been tried to no effect.
I´m sure the ACLU is getting on those potential civil liberty violations as we speak.

Confident that he often reads my posts here on these Lucianne threads… BHO, I suggest you immediately drop whatever it is you’re doing and instead find and carefully read and learn a thing or two from yesterday’s column by Ann Coulter entitled ”Guns Don’t Kill People, the Mentally Ill Do.” I assure you it’ll be time well spent.

No need to thank me. But, if you insist, you’re welcome.

The author claims these proposals won´t work and then points out that several recent mass murderers passed background checks. That is the point! The background checklist is not getting nearly enough information. Why, it isn´t even possible today for a seriously mental ill person to voluntarily get his name added to the list (reasoning that he knows he obsesses about guns during a psychotic episode and he might have another such episode at some point). The background lists need to be more complete and universally used.

I read the one about nominating an ATF director three times. Is Mr. Obama really issue an executive order compelling himself to fill a job he´s left vacant for four years? I can´t put my finger on why that sounds so loopy, but I take it as evidence that rule by executive order has officially gotten out of hand.

FTA ~ “Direct the attorney general to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.”

Well a dangerous person did slip through the cracks to become pRESIDENT. No one ever reviewed his ´category´. As a result we are subjected to daily assaults on our rights.

The name of the insurance company escapes me at the moment but if they ever want to choose a new ´Mayhem Guy´ Zippy would fit the bill. Now THERE is a commercial I would watch.

I suspect why so little emphasis on the real reason for these school shootings; mental health, is that Obama would rather take on the NRA - an easy target in his eyes than the ACLU.

Curious as to how much more extensive do we want background checks to purchase a gun? Why not background checks to buy a car? I seem to recall some Iranian who ran over a bunch of people at some univeristy a few years ago. Or perhaps background checks when purchasing some common household poisons - I´m sure a few people have been killed by rat poison over the years....

None of the background checks or precautions in place or to be in place would have stopped the mass murders. All slipped through because you can´t know what is in a person´s mind. That is why the only logical defense is to have sane, responsible persons available and ready to stand up to a mad man or woman. LaPierre was mocked but he is right. The only way to defeat a bad guy with a gun is to have a good guy with a gun. Or a good grandmother with a gun.

I took an NRA hunters safety course when I was 14 years old. That was over 50 years ago. The NRA has been way ahead of the govt in the area of weapons safety training.

We could laugh at Obama´s posteuring except for the fact that he is proposing to spend several billions of dollars on, I know not what, as he has not been very specific about that.

Obama is exhibiting traits that should repulse voters. He is a serial liar , he contradicts himself, saying while he is in office the exact opposite of what he said when he was not, cruel, rude, shameless, hateful and prejudiced. His worshippers brush all this aside when he smiles and tells them: "It´s really very simple, if the Republicans would just" (whatever).

Obama is all about the show. I am sure that when this tragedy happened that he and his administration recognized it as a opportunity not to be missed and the talking points went out before the nightly news. This man has no shame and will use anything to advance his agenda. Dancing on the graves of these children meant nothing more than a means to an end to him.

For those who may want to ban guns altogether, go back and read the history of the 18th Amendment. The violence and corruption that was born of this action is still with us today.

FTA...such as helping schools and churches develop more effective emergency-response programs.

There already was such a program but zippy let the funding run out a year or so ago. Buying those 0phones was so much more important.

Poster #5:

Ever been prescribed an anti-depressant? Been diagnosed ADD? Taken a pain med? Sleeping pill? Just told your doctor you have been feeling a little "down" lately?

Should you be allowed to own a gun?

Ok, let me get this straight. In order to process a background check, the applicant must provide proof of ID, right? But when conservatives want the same proof in order to be able to vote, we are called racists. Therefore, background checks are RAAAAAAAAACIST!!!

His incompetence and failure to lead does not just disappoint conservatives. "Tin-pot dictator" keeps popping into my head.

I nominate #8 for the posting of the day!
Love it! OOOH-Rahh!

FTA- "And Obama’s notion of dragooning the country’s doctors into a network of snitches
who ask their patients if they have guns at home is just repugnant."

This part of Obamacare is known
as " Snitches Not Stitches ".
BTW-Under Obamacare , during the yearly " free " physical exam , physicians are prohibited ..by Obama´s federal law,
from discussing any other conditions other than the original reason for the visit.
If you schedule your yearly " free " exam to discuss a backache-that is the only topic the doctor can discuss with you. Period. End.
If you decide to tell him about your headaches ,
the doctor ,
by law, will have to tell you to stop.
Every visit has to be coded for a specific problem .
The annual wellness visit cannot be coded
with any other
ailment or the physician can be charged with insurance fraud and can possibly lose his license.
If you want to discuss your headaches , you now have to make another appointment,
which will delay any diagnostic testing.
The same Obama that forbids doctors from discussing more than one physical problem during the exam,
will now permit / force
the doctors to discuss guns.

I agree with #16. I suggest never telling your doctor you are feeling just a little down, or you would like something to help you out of the doldrums. The Feds will soon have the ability to track your prescriptions and all they need to do is compare them to a list of medicines used for those purposes. Next, a knock on your door ----- give me your guns!

Agree with #21. I would never discuss the issue of guns with a physician. It is none of your doctor´s business. And it´s none of your childrens´ teachers business, either.

There are far more deaths from illegal guns in the inner city and from gangs than are committed by "mentally ill" individuals.

Shooting blanks makes noise, and distracts, making people think about the noise. Meanwhile, what is being done to cut federal government spending??

What is being done by the democratics to come up with a budget...it´s been over three years since a budget has been passed, and by law it is supposed to be done annually.

It must be that the laws are for everyone else to follow, and our enlightened elites in Washington D.C. can´t be burdened with silly laws or even the constitution.

C U T T H E S P E N D I N G ! ! !

Start the campaign by finding out ALL the people involved with Fast and Furious. Recuse yourself and Holder. Maybe get that guy who put the master criminal, Scooter Libby, behind bars.

If your Dr. asks you about guns, have him complete this first:

http://www.keepandbeararms.com/downloads/gundocform.pdf

#9, why would Obama ever want to take on the ACLU? They´re after the same thing he is: destroying the country by fundamentally transforming it.

"Photo-op president shooting blanks"

Now that´s funny on many levels.