A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


‘Disappointed’ NRA sees
White House ‘agenda
to attack’ gun rights

Washington Times, by David Sherfinski

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/10/2013 10:44:06 PM

The National Rifle Association said it was “disappointed” with the focus of a Thursday meeting with Vice President Joseph R. Biden and other groups over new gun measures, arguing that the White House gathering had less to do with keeping the country’s children safe and more to do “with an agenda to attack the Second Amendment.” “We attended today’s White House meeting to discuss how to keep our children safe and were prepared to have a meaningful conversation about school safety, mental health issues, the marketing of violence to our kids and the collapse of federal prosecutions of violent criminals,”

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: 4Justice, 1/11/2013 4:30:02 AM     (No. 9110158)

Did they really believe Biden and the Dems wanted to discuss keeping children safe??? Why are the people who are supposed be protecting our rights so naive??? It seems like they always expect the left to be sincere about what they say. They seem to be so gullible. I don´t get it! They should KNOW that these leftists are ALWAYS scheming and are never straight with anyone to whom they are ideologically opposed.


Reply 2 - Posted by: strike3, 1/11/2013 4:32:52 AM     (No. 9110159)

I hope that the NRA spokesperson is just being diplomatic and that they actually didn´t believe they could conduct any kind of a "meaningful" talk with the gun grabbers. Barry assigned Joe to this task for a reason and it is obvious that the decisions have already been made. The meetings with "stakeholders" were a mere formality so the dictator could twist the statements into the result that "most" Americans want strict gun control.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 1/11/2013 5:11:41 AM     (No. 9110178)

There was no "conversation." It was a BiteMe harangue about evil guns!


Reply 4 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 1/11/2013 7:15:18 AM     (No. 9110246)

I can´t wait to see what they really mean by "allowing federal agencies to conduct research on gun violence".
I can envision a day when you will be refused treatment under ObamaCare unless you agree to give up all guns registered to you as well as any found in a subsequent search of your property.


Reply 5 - Posted by: pineledger, 1/11/2013 7:28:35 AM     (No. 9110267)

It was not a conversation, any more than the "conversations" about Obamacare.

People didn´t want that, either, and look what happened.


Reply 6 - Posted by: rabbit, 1/11/2013 7:53:03 AM     (No. 9110297)

The publicly-stated subject of the meeting was "gun violence". If the NRA arrived and thought the subject was "school safety", then they obviously ignored the invitation they were given as well as all of the media publicity using the term "gun violence".

The NRA may be unhappy with how the meeting went, but it is disingenuous to suggest that the White House changed the subject.


Reply 7 - Posted by: nonsense, 1/11/2013 7:55:26 AM     (No. 9110302)

I want all political meetings to be televised. Where is the ad of the faux potus telling his adoring fans that he will be the most Transparent pol in history? Ramp it up with his own words.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: faith_and_reason, 1/11/2013 8:17:05 AM     (No. 9110335)

Google searches for Hitler, Stalin and gun control or confiscation were very high in recent months. Were regime agents researching what processes worked in the past? What unforseen "obstacles" had to be overcome (or killed)?

Or were patriots arming themselves with the same information?

Both?


Reply 9 - Posted by: Judith, 1/11/2013 8:19:39 AM     (No. 9110343)

Let´s face it. Since pelosi took the gavel, the dems have made it quite clear they intend to become dictators in this country. And, because of a gutless congress and a corrupted supreme court and, it would appear, a compliant citizenry, they are achieving this goal.


Reply 10 - Posted by: LZK, 1/11/2013 8:28:49 AM     (No. 9110363)

Oh baby oh baby -- let them come for mine.....

LZK


Reply 11 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 1/11/2013 8:49:20 AM     (No. 9110397)

Poster 6, I´ve seen 10 replays of sanctimonious biden at the gun violence conference in his muffled affect talking about those "defenseless children at the Connecticut school riddled with bullets, not hit with stray bullets, but riddled." Democrats always change the subject. They specialize in emotional, straw man arguments. Democrats constantly redefine words and use euphemisms to suit their leftist agenda. So please don´t cause our eyes to roll with your silly lecture about changing the subject.


Reply 12 - Posted by: bigken2, 1/11/2013 8:52:35 AM     (No. 9110402)

the fact that the head of thev NRA didnt go was all i needed to know this was obozo waggin his finger in our face telling us he is king and we had better comply whell we though out one king we can do it again up yours obozo


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 1/11/2013 8:55:26 AM     (No. 9110405)

Some people sat on their hands and did not vote for Republicans - a third party is not the answer and adds to splitting the vote and a losing one for the Pubbies. Until we have control of both houses we are dead in the water and the dims can do whatever they want.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Rinktum, 1/11/2013 9:19:09 AM     (No. 9110456)

Obama is pushing this country to violence because it will further his agenda. He wants chaos in this country and he will have it because he can´t fundamentally change this country without it. He is being provocatively contentious in dealing with the issue of gun control. He is in perpetual community organizer agitating mode. The democrats are in perpetual crisis mode. The media is in perpetual propagamda mode, and the Republicans are in perpetual whipped dog mode. Another perfect storm for governmental tyranny perpetrated on American citizens.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Rinktum, 1/11/2013 9:20:56 AM     (No. 9110460)

Sorry, I can spell propaganda. Carry on.


Reply 16 - Posted by: BetseyRoss, 1/11/2013 10:09:49 AM     (No. 9110577)

Obama has already geared up for this. His FEMA(DHS) has the training and facilities. However, at this point in time they don´t have enough people. They just have places for mass graves and ways to trasport the bodies. Make no mistake he wants to do this. He may never have enough people, but he needs to be stopped. Too bad our wimps in Congress can´t seem to get it right.


Reply 17 - Posted by: nevernaught, 1/11/2013 10:20:07 AM     (No. 9110599)

The real question is ... do you trust leaders who are sending our tanks and other armaments to the Muslim Brotherhood terrorists in Egypt to be used against Israel. The same people who sent 2000 assault weapons to the Drug Cartel in Mexico that caused the murder of 300 Mexican people. Do you trust them not use the guns they take away from you against you.

Obama and the rest of the criminals in Washington DC are about to start another civil war in this country by attempting to disarm law abiding citizens. They now have a clear record of killing innocent people around the world. They need controlling, not tax paying, law abiding people who need to protect themselves in Obama´s world. Who works for who in this twisted country today.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: pete moss, 1/11/2013 10:20:08 AM     (No. 9110600)

Number 14 is right on the money. Our elected criminals, who have spent our country broke, would like nothing more than to create a one party dictatorship. I never thought I´d live to see it, but I fear that we are well on our way to another civil war.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Butch59, 1/11/2013 10:46:32 AM     (No. 9110661)

"When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security". From the Declaration of Independence.

These are the words of Thomas Jefferson himself. And he was supposed to be the first "Democrat"?

This is what Obozo is leading up to. Whether it´s intentional or not is not worth debating. He´s doing it. And, if we believe in the Declaration, and all we have learned from the writings of the founders ( those of us who have actually read them) then the time is fasting approaching for us to rise up and throw off the tyranny that is encompassing us.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 1/11/2013 11:09:32 AM     (No. 9110715)

Maybe it´s time for a million-gun-owners march on Washington & the WH, all carrying toy wooden guns for symbolism.

How about five million or ten million. I´d be there.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Silly Old Me, 1/11/2013 11:16:14 AM     (No. 9110733)

Just thinking, but why dont they enforce some of the 20,000 gun laws already on the books?


Reply 22 - Posted by: mrduc, 1/11/2013 11:36:30 AM     (No. 9110779)

Protection of the public is just a fig leaf. Our state and federal goobermints are wearing very tiny figleaves. If they had even a decent sized pair, they would have gone after the ILLEGAL guns in our inner cities decades ago and stopped the slaughter of the minorities, innocent and not-so-innocent, who live with gun violence every night.

But they haven´t, have they?

Democrats are such racists.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: RayLRiv, 1/11/2013 11:38:53 AM     (No. 9110783)

Last night I renewed my NRA membership for three years - and I don´t even own a gun (not yet.) I let my original membership expire back in 2008. Last night I was on hold 28 minutes before I got through to a live NRA operator/associate.


Reply 24 - Posted by: a man over thirty, 1/11/2013 11:59:51 AM     (No. 9110823)

#24 - explain how please.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Grambo, 1/11/2013 12:04:41 PM     (No. 9110836)

You could not find a clearer, unmistakably brazen assault on the Constitution than this gun offensive. The mask is off, the gloves are off, all pretense of legitimacy is gone, and the line is drawn between the governors and the governed. Benjamin Franklin told us we had been given representative republic, if we could now just keep it. He knew that in time the test would come. Well, the time is here and we are the ones who will succeed or fail. It’s us or the man from nowhere.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Grambo, 1/11/2013 12:06:50 PM     (No. 9110843)

#24 is playing his NRA (not real American) song again. It´s getting old.


Reply 27 - Posted by: bob913, 1/11/2013 12:21:06 PM     (No. 9110875)

Hypocrite!!


obama gives himself lifetime protection with armed guards 24/7...

FLASHBACK: obama opposed bill to allow person to use gun to save own life in own home...


Reply 28 - Posted by: LadyHen, 1/11/2013 1:01:35 PM     (No. 9110970)

Of course the NRA knew going in that the Obama administration were not plain dealers and would not be serious. They also know what the American people care about, safety. Hence the statement and hence not letting Obama reframe the real argument.

Not allowing over emotional know nothing pols reframe the real argument is a classic tactic of coming from a position of rational strength. Try it sometime.. pretty liberating.


Reply 29 - Posted by: 4Justice, 1/11/2013 1:07:59 PM     (No. 9110985)

#24 never explains himself, but I think his argument is that because the NRA added in the provision to the ACA that doctors should be discouraged from asking if people have a gun in their home that somehow they helped support and pass the bill. I don´t see it that way. I think they knew it was likely going to be pushed through anyway so they threw in the provision to keep them from using the information against gun owners. I don´t think that necessarily was a cause for the passage of Zerocare, however.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Marzon, 1/11/2013 1:13:06 PM     (No. 9110997)

Wasn´t it one of Obama´s cabinet members who said at a graduation speech that "like Mao, we realize the only real power comes from the barrel of a gun"? They believe it and therefore they want to be the only ones with the guns.

They crave total power and they don´t care if they have to kill to get it. (See Fast & Furious). I believe they are perfectly willing to ignite a civil war to get it. The struggles of the coming days are exactly what the 2nd Amendment was written for. But how may Americans are willing to fight, kill, and possibly die, to defend thier liberties? Too few I fear...


Reply 31 - Posted by: JoElla Bee, 1/11/2013 1:17:49 PM     (No. 9111013)

I had a conversation recently with a woman who had gone to a new doctor. She was asked to fill out a questionnaire. One of the questions was whether or not she had guns in her household, and, if so, how many.

I asked what on earth that had to do with healthcare. She said she didn´t know, but that there were other questions about such things as income, etc., that seemed equally odd for such a questionnaire.

Reminds me of the questionnaire for members of the military that I was told about during the Clinton years. One of the questions dealt with the willingness of the person to fire on U.S. citizens. And, we all remember the military tanks at Waco.

These things, of course, didn´t come about overnight, or as the result of recent events. Lefist comrades in spirit, who are long since dead, dreamed of these times when their dreams are coming to fruition.


Reply 32 - Posted by: flatwater, 1/11/2013 1:50:09 PM     (No. 9111089)

#6,

Your friends at democraticunderground.com and communistpartyusa.org miss you terribly. Why don´t you go back and join them?

Whatever the White House pays you to troll here, it´s way, way too much.


Reply 33 - Posted by: tocsin, 1/11/2013 2:12:06 PM     (No. 9111150)

OH!#6-Elmer Fudd would like a word with you.


Reply 34 - Posted by: lana720, 1/11/2013 2:27:30 PM     (No. 9111188)

Why aren´t these meetings or "Conversations" on C-SPAN?
Seems we should at least be able to see a transcript of who said what.


Reply 35 - Posted by: rmyersne, 1/11/2013 3:32:54 PM     (No. 9111297)

NRA was very smart to send a representative so they could at least hear the dialogue that took place in that room. I am sure going in that the NRA knew that the Whitehouse would not listen to their suggestions.


Reply 36 - Posted by: peterfleming, 1/11/2013 6:33:51 PM     (No. 9111575)

What other lobbying bodies are out there? Let´s not put all our gun defending eggs in one NRA basket. Imagine all this new socialist nazi pressure, more than ever before, and all of it focused on the NRA. The NRA likely will not fold, but now is the time to introduce new voices, new institutions to speak up. More voices. Dear Ted is not the only spokesman. And, we have to ask, where is OUR British guy, who is not a communist, OUR counter-terrorist Brit who can spar with Herr Piers Adolph Morgan.
OUR guy who can tell us how miserable things
are in England, having no guns, while being over run by totalitarian muslims and tons more socialism. Let´s get our own Olympic
Pro Gun Team out there.


Reply 37 - Posted by: wsdiego, 1/11/2013 7:15:23 PM     (No. 9111633)

As long as we have an administration that want to take away our constitutional rights there is no such thing as too many guns!



Post Reply   Close thread 718497




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Democrats push problem
solvers in House contests
Washington Post, by Paul Kane    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:38:26 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Party officials believe that Kevin Strouse is exactly the kind of candidate who can help them retake the House next year. He’s a smart, young former Army Ranger — good qualities for any aspiring politician. But what party leaders really like is that Strouse doesn’t have particularly strong views on the country’s hottest issues. Immigration? Tax policy? “Certainly I have a lot of research to do,” Strouse acknowledged in an interview Thursday as he announced his candidacy in a suburban Philadelphia House district. Strouse’s candidacy reflects an emerging

Texas prosecutors’ slayings
unnerve rural Kaufman County
Washington Post, by Stephanie McCrummen    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:33:08 PM     Post Reply
KAUFMAN, Tex. — The judge was on the phone. “Yep, I said I’ll do anything,” Bruce Wood told the person on the other end, rubbing his forehead. “They asked me to do a eulogy. I don’t know what I’m going to say.” Elsewhere in the Kaufman County Courthouse, a sheriff’s deputy was handing out bulletproof vests. “I brought the smallest one,” he said to a secretary, who stared at the khaki armor as he explained how to adjust the side straps should the need arise. “These have the neck for a female.” Outside, two armed guards

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

A Reporter Explains Why
Gun Coverage Is So Biased
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:13:14 PM     Post Reply
Well, not intentionally. But Jim Ragsdale of the Minneapolis Star Tribune attended a conference in Chicago on covering gun issues, which he describes this way: “Covering Guns” brought reporters with front-line experience covering mass shootings in Tucson, Ariz.; Aurora, Colo.; Newtown, Conn., and Red Lake, Minn., to meet with gun experts and advocates and gun trainers. Sponsored by the Poynter journalism center and funded by the McCormick Foundation of Chicago, we gathered in a city that witnessed 506 homicides last year. The idea, I take it

Report: Carbon Emissions
in US Lowest Since 1994
PJ Media, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:03:02 PM     Post Reply
Carbon emissions in the US were at their lowest level in 2012 since 1994, according to figures released by the US Energy Information Administration. We did it without carbon trading scams, the EPA making carbon dioxide a poison, or obeying the dictates of the Kyoto climate Treaty. We did it partly because of decreased economic activity as a result of the Obama recovery-that-isn’t, but mostly because of good old fashioned market forces; competition between natural gas and coal: Energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2012 were the lowest in the United States since 1994

Video: Parents Turn on Fossil-
Fuel Protesters at Tufts
National Review Online, by Stanley Kurtz    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 8:33:04 PM     Post Reply
When I tell campus horror-stories like “What’s the Matter With Vassar?” people ask if parents know what’s going on at these schools. I don’t think they want to know. But guess what happens when protesters step on others’ rights in full view of parents? Tufts has one of the most active campus fossil-fuel divestment groups. Lately these protesters have been infiltrating orientation sessions and campus tours for prospective students, mostly high school juniors traveling with their parents. Climate protesters interrupt these recruitment activities with questions

Behind the Dismal Jobs Numbers:
The ‘New’ Economy Takes Shape
PJ Media, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 8:27:24 PM     Post Reply
It is amazing just how wrong economists were in their predictions for the number of jobs that were to be created in March. The “consensus” figure was 200,000 — a far cry from the actual number created which was 88,000. Totally “unexpected,” as usual. In one way, you can’t blame them. After a better than average gain in February of 236,000 (revised upward this month to 268,000), along with some positive numbers in housing and consumer spending, there were no doubt many analysts who began breathing a sigh of relief and believing that the long-awaited jobs recovery was upon us.

The New Climate Deniers?
American Thinker, by David Lawrence    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:33:09 AM     Post Reply
Rich Lowery in the New York Post (4-02-2013) accuses the liberals of being the new climate deniers, considering that they don´t recognize that there´s been no global warming for the last fifteen years. This shouldn´t surprise Lowery. When the liberals hang onto the neck of a cause, they don´t let go. They have ignored murders, rapes, wars, nuclear proliferation, and everything wrong with the world to focus in on their little area -- the horror of carbon emissions. You´d think liberals would have learned from their earlier panic about overpopulation

Obama’s feeble salary ‘sacrifice’
Washington Post, by Dana Milbank    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:13:50 PM     Post Reply
“President Obama plans to give up 5 percent of his salary this year to draw attention to the financial sacrifice of more than 1 million federal employees who will be furloughed.” — The Washington Post, April 4 “Here’s the plan. We get the warhead and we hold the world ransom for 1 MILLION DOLLARS !” — Dr. Evil in “Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery” At the annual White House Easter Egg Roll this week, President Obama decided to shoot some hoops with the kids. He wound up going 2 for 22. The abysmal field-goal percentage — 9 percent

Johns Hopkins’s and Planned
Parenthood’s troubling extremism
Washington Post, by George F. Will    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:05:52 PM     Post Reply
We know Johns Hopkins University is devoted to diversity, because it says so. Its “Diversity and Inclusion Statement,” a classic of the genre, says the university is “committed to sharing values of diversity and inclusion .?.?. by recruiting and retaining a diverse group of students.” Hopkins has an Office of Institutional Equity and a “Diversity Leadership Council” that defines “inclusion” as “active, thoughtful and ongoing engagement with each other.” Unless you are a member of Voice for Life (VFL), an antiabortion group. Hopkins’s Student Government Association has denied VFL status

Obama budget would cut entitlements
in exchange for tax increases
Washington Post, by Zachary A. Goldfarb and Karen Tumulty    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:02:41 PM     Post Reply
President Obama will propose a budget next week that embraces a risky strategy of courting Republicans for a grand bargain on the debt while angering Democratic allies with cuts to the nation’s entitlement programs. White House officials said Friday that Obama’s budget would cut Medicare and Social Security and ask for less tax revenue than he has previously sought. The budget, to be released Wednesday, will fully incorporate the offer Obama made to House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) during December’s “fiscal cliff” talks — which included $1.8 trillion in deficit reduction through spending cuts and tax increases.

NRA tactics erode post-Newtown
support for gun-control measures
Washington Post, by Tom Hamburger    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:00:22 PM     Post Reply
Sen Mark Begich declared a “sea change” in the politics of gun control immediately after the school shooting in Newtown, Conn., telling his local newspaper that he would not hesitate to buck the powerful National Rifle Association. But in the months since, the gun rights group has made itself impossible for the Alaska Democrat, and many other lawmakers, to resist. Begich has signed on as a co-sponsor of a bill, drafted in consultation with the NRA, that would change the way mental illness is reported in the background check system — a measure that critics say



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

63 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
59 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

56 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

38 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

37 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

White House Blames Jobs
Numbers on Sequester

36 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM     Post Reply
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look

The Secrets of Princeton
34 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for

Obama Budget to Cap Retirement
Accounts at $3 Million

30 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 9:40:39 PM     Post Reply
The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts. According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals "to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving." "The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per


Post Reply   Close thread 718497





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS