A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Higher health care premiums could
cause Obamacare to death spiral

Washington Examiner [DC], by Philip Klein

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 1/9/2013 5:45:19 AM

This weekend, the New York Times reported on a development that’s completely unsurprising to critics of President Obama’s national health care law: “Health insurance companies across the country are seeking and winning double-digit increases in premiums for some customers, even though one of the biggest objectives of the Obama administration’s health care law was to stem the rapid rise in insurance costs for consumers.” The Times story heavily suggests that the problem is that Obamacare didn’t give federal regulators enough power to outright reject rate increases deemed too high.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 1/9/2013 6:24:40 AM     (No. 9106425)

That´s always the reason that big government doesn´t work. It wasn´t BIG enough. If only the government had absolute control of everything and everyone.....then it would work, but not until then.

Old story and a bad one.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Spidey, 1/9/2013 6:47:18 AM     (No. 9106436)

State insurance regulators had to practically beg for rate increases but under Obamacare,it´s become a no holds barred in raising premiums,making insurance even more unaffordable for business and individuals.

What happens when people drop out of buying insurance is low risk people are the ones bailing ,leaving a pool of high risk people,which causes rates to go even higher.The costs of having the take pre existing conditions is obliterating the entire insurance model that took decades to come up with the right formulas.

This was pure liberal utopianism without regard to real world costs.High risk people should have been excluded from general insurance altogether and come up with government funding for them instead.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: OhMy, 1/9/2013 6:51:13 AM     (No. 9106438)

It is not really insurance when you must issue a policy when the individual discovers they are sick and cover that person for the same rate as a healthy individual. Insurance is sharing a risk not paying for a certainty! Can you buy fire insurance when your house is already burning down?


Reply 4 - Posted by: Janjan, 1/9/2013 6:56:06 AM     (No. 9106447)

A badly written bill put together by clueless congressional aids, shoved through Congress against the people´s will and intended to plunge us into socialism (after Obama´s re-election of course). Not even the Feds understand what is in this so they are floundering around and issuing waivers in every direction. As this unfolds there is going to be more horror on people´s faces every day. The Democrats are going to pay a price for this but the damage will never fully be undone.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Jethro bo, 1/9/2013 6:57:17 AM     (No. 9106449)

Who would have guessed that mandating that the sickest folks get everything they want or need anytime they want it and paid for by younger healthy people would run into trouble?


Reply 6 - Posted by: Johnny Angle, 1/9/2013 7:02:02 AM     (No. 9106456)

Thank you, John Roberts, you despicable traitor.


Reply 7 - Posted by: mickeymat, 1/9/2013 7:08:27 AM     (No. 9106464)

This was the intent all along for Mr. Obama. Perhaps some who voted for it were duped but if so, they will continue to be duped as we face the results of this despicable law.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: rational, 1/9/2013 7:14:48 AM     (No. 9106471)

John Roberts will go down in history as a traitor to the U.S Constitution. In a word, this fresh hell called Obamacare would have went down as the biggest blunder of a corrupt-filled administration. Instead, it has emboldened the left to turn this country into their Socialist/Communist utopia that will never recover in our lifetime. I hope he has guilt pinges the rest of his life. Then he can take it up with St. Peter.


Reply 9 - Posted by: beca, 1/9/2013 7:17:53 AM     (No. 9106477)

cant blame the repubs for OCARE....


Reply 10 - Posted by: rplat, 1/9/2013 7:23:12 AM     (No. 9106482)

Thanks Roberts . . . you really stuck it to us this time. Enjoy your freshly pressed robes and your lifetime job.


Reply 11 - Posted by: SourKraut, 1/9/2013 7:28:32 AM     (No. 9106489)

"The Times story heavily suggests that the problem is that Obamacare didn’t give federal regulators enough power to outright reject rate increases deemed too high"

translation:

The problem is that the law didn´t give the governement the power to force insurers to give away insurance for ´fair´ rates, and force them out of business.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Bpl40, 1/9/2013 7:37:27 AM     (No. 9106499)

It used to be that the phrase "Democrats will pay for this" meant Republicans will win an election. That is no longer true. A party controlled by Beltway RINOs and contested knee jerk by 47% parasites will remain incapable of taking any political advantage for time to come.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Chiritwo, 1/9/2013 7:51:39 AM     (No. 9106516)

Not only did our representatives in Washington not read the fine print, they didn´t read the big print either. They certainly weren´t looking out for their constituents so who were they looking out for. I don´t know if this has ever happened in the history of America where the congresspeople were so irresponsible as to sign a country changing bill that they had never read. This country is changing - the low info voter voted for this president without knowing anything about him. Maybe they´ll copying Congress - Congress voted this bill in with no information about the contents.


Reply 14 - Posted by: disasterman, 1/9/2013 7:52:42 AM     (No. 9106519)

One of the biggest objectives of 0bamacare was to stem the rise of insurance costs??? Maybe in some liberals wildest fantasy. The true objective of 0bamacare is single payer and the end of all private health care in this country. If you believe anything else it´s too late for you.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Crosscut, 1/9/2013 7:54:19 AM     (No. 9106521)

Obamacare is poorly written Democrat garbage legislation that will fail on it´s own. It is the most stupid Democrat legislation since LBJ´s great society bs.


Reply 16 - Posted by: oh-heck, 1/9/2013 8:10:13 AM     (No. 9106535)

The real problem is that they needed to force people to buy insurance and can´t. So people only sign up when sick. Healthy people look at the premium and decide there is no incentive to pay premiums until they too are sick. Once sick they consume medical care at twice the cost rung up by previous high risk pools. And government is precluded from making the fines so high they force people to join an insurance pool.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 1/9/2013 8:12:56 AM     (No. 9106540)

"If you like your current insurance (after we have killed it)then you can keep it."

Progressives know they can never reveal the true costs and effects of their pipe dreams.

Those who cherish liberty above all have no use for incrementalism.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 1/9/2013 8:13:09 AM     (No. 9106541)

Every so-called "democracy" has the seeds of it´s own destruction sew into it´s fabric at inception. Ours was the stupid concept that every citizen could vote without restriction. Once the poor found out they outnumbered the rich and could vote themselves any and all portions of the treasury, the death of the Republic was a certainty. Øbamacare is the embodiment of that national death sentence.


Reply 19 - Posted by: krause, 1/9/2013 8:13:31 AM     (No. 9106542)

Obama: ´Health care premiums will go down $2500.´


Reply 20 - Posted by: Nimby, 1/9/2013 8:15:14 AM     (No. 9106549)

And where was NYT on this before the elections?


Reply 21 - Posted by: OperaBuff, 1/9/2013 8:16:24 AM     (No. 9106553)

Ignore his words. Listen to his actions. Is he helping or is he destroying?


Reply 22 - Posted by: Pearson365, 1/9/2013 8:32:06 AM     (No. 9106579)

# 14´s comments are spot on. ObamaCare was passed to start the nationalization of the entire healthcare industry. For example, shrink the profits and then the number of health insurers. Once there are only 5 to 6 enormous providers, HHS will essentially control every aspect of their business. This small number of providers also means a steady flow of large bribes, oops, campaign contributions, to reduce future regulatory burdens.

ObamaCare is designed to fail. For the more that it fails, the more Obama, fhe Democrats and the media can call for still more Obama solutions. Biden will soon be heading up another commission, this one on how to stop soaring healthcare premiums. Commission will be stocked with socialists, and it will surely recommend stringent price controls, federally run clinics, increases in the tax on uninsured, etc.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Adam, 1/9/2013 8:39:38 AM     (No. 9106598)

This was patently obvious from the start, The program would perforce cause skyrocketing premiums people couldn´t afford, businesses to pay the fine instead, eventually putting everyone under the government control as the only way to get coverage. Obama admitted this back in 2007. He said you can´t get to single payer in one shot. Thank you very much low information voter.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Revolution76, 1/9/2013 8:52:05 AM     (No. 9106624)

The purpose of Ocare was to put private insurance out of business. The laws effects force them to raise premiums which mean more people will drop their private insurance, on and on until the private insurance companies have no choice but to discontinue health insurance all together.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Quaestio, 1/9/2013 9:01:37 AM     (No. 9106638)

So we all know this was the intent. Obviously Obama´s handlers think this will smoothly transition into a single-payer system, as the uniformed masses beg for socialized medicine once ´capitalist´ medicine has failed. But I think they may have underestimated two things. One, the fact that our government will never be able to actually implement and run even a single payer system and two, the amount of chaos and anger generated as the current system fails.


Reply 26 - Posted by: MattMusson, 1/9/2013 9:09:20 AM     (No. 9106663)

Obamacare was never the end game. Obamacare was just passed to crash the system.

Single Payer is the next step.


Reply 27 - Posted by: privateer, 1/9/2013 9:09:42 AM     (No. 9106665)

Same dopey post, same lack of reasoning. How about this for a slogan: Waiver Fairness!! Waivers for All or Waivers for None. Waiver Fairness!! No waivers, no peace.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Grambo, 1/9/2013 9:18:30 AM     (No. 9106677)

Lest we forget, over and above the cost of premiums to individuals, the damage that Ocare wreaks on the health care industry infrastructure, from hospitals, to doctors and medical device manufacturers, is going to make healthcare harder to find, regardless of price.


Reply 29 - Posted by: snakeoil, 1/9/2013 9:21:17 AM     (No. 9106684)

#25. I assume that the NRA you reference stands for Not Real Americans. I have written my congresscritter several e-mails and letters stating my total opposition to zerøØcare only to discover he can´t read.


Reply 30 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 1/9/2013 9:22:07 AM     (No. 9106685)

What 27 said. Single payer was the objective all along. There is a old video of obama speaking at some forum where he said, "I´ve always been in favor of a single payer plan." Recall that hillary clinton´s state run health care bill from the 90s included a substantial fine for anyone who attempted to purchase private health insurance. It´s hard to believe that obama doesn´t seek the same goal to eliminate private policies.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 1/9/2013 9:41:13 AM     (No. 9106713)

Could someone explain what #25 means that the NRA passed 0bamacare?

BTW: Yesterday, I just gave the NRA a nice big contribution.


Reply 32 - Posted by: mambo 5, 1/9/2013 9:58:20 AM     (No. 9106740)

I think democrats should be sent back to school for basic math lessons.


Reply 33 - Posted by: GoDeacs79, 1/9/2013 10:01:04 AM     (No. 9106749)

Wait, this can´t be true. The preezy promised a 3000% decrease in premiums. Surely he was telling the truth.


Reply 34 - Posted by: retiree, 1/9/2013 10:12:21 AM     (No. 9106773)

I cannot afford an increase. Plan D raised this month, medicare raised this month. SS increase barely meeting these increases.
Barely get by from month to month. All I have left is my home of 38 years but looks like I will have to put it on the market. I would like to hold out till housing prices pick up a little but may not be able too.
Much of our savings spent when spouse was sick for years before passing.


Reply 35 - Posted by: stryker714, 1/9/2013 10:31:32 AM     (No. 9106816)

Those above who criticize Roberts are correct: With all the careful scrutiny in court cases, consider: jurors who might have heard something about the case & dismissed; judges that have conflict of interest who step down/recuse on that basis; prosecutors who are related to the murdered and recuse themselves; judges that were on drugs during a case, causing guilty verdicts to be thrown out. So then we have the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court, where Kagan refused to recuse herself on the ACA issue and Roberts says he made his decision based on what he heard on the news and how it would make the Supreme Court look?! Outrageous!!!

If those DC commies/judges aren´t going to follow laws, the Constitution, protocols, traditional checks and balances then we citizens aren´t going to either! Enough is enough. Get the piano wire ready a la Mussolini. There´s some stringing up to be done!


Reply 36 - Posted by: Tendoy, 1/9/2013 10:43:46 AM     (No. 9106840)

The information is interesting but the Washington Examiner needs to edit for spelling and grammar. ;-)


Reply 37 - Posted by: mulhaven, 1/9/2013 11:09:25 AM     (No. 9106880)

Bull crap. This was an intended consequence of the nasty pipsqueak in the White House. Now he can demagogue the insurance comapanies as being rapacious and then get the public goofs to use governement insurance.


Reply 38 - Posted by: pineledger, 1/9/2013 11:09:48 AM     (No. 9106882)

What´s one more lie?


Reply 39 - Posted by: Butch59, 1/9/2013 11:20:05 AM     (No. 9106895)

Why didn´t the people of coastal Mississippi rush out and buy flood insurance right after Katrina hit? Isn´t that the same as forcing insurance companies to immediately cover pre-existing conditions?

And I have to agree with many other posters. The end objective of Obamacare is to completely end the private operation of health care and make it a completely operated federal government system.

Another question. When the government takes over health care, just where and from whom are people going to get healthcare? By that time, there won´t be anywhere near enough doctors, nurses, hospitals, laboratory´s, etc. Any suggestions?


Reply 40 - Posted by: cincinnati whig, 1/9/2013 11:29:16 AM     (No. 9106915)

Do you all still not get it? ObamaCare was designed to fail, to ´prove´ that we ´need´ Single Payer


Reply 41 - Posted by: Burger, 1/9/2013 11:48:20 AM     (No. 9106966)

Don´t you get it? Government NEVER fails. We are stuck with this forever.
We were warned.


Reply 42 - Posted by: pros7767, 1/9/2013 11:49:25 AM     (No. 9106973)

Spot on #41. The lack of gov´ts ability to regulate price increases was done by design. They knew insurance rates would skyrocket, requiring a single payer system. It´s working beautifully.

God help us.


Reply 43 - Posted by: strike3, 1/9/2013 12:23:23 PM     (No. 9107054)

You will notice that not even Barry The Babbler calls it the "Affordable Care Act" any longer. That was a pure Joseph Goebbels statement to get the idiot voters to swallow this mess. Barry barely mentions his health care law any more because he is too busy trying to take our guns away. Could there be a connection?


Reply 44 - Posted by: Happy Trails, 1/9/2013 12:49:46 PM     (No. 9107125)

This is Obama: Abort the Constitution. Disarm the resistance. Pour sugar in the gas tank of the economy.
Remember Nikita Krurschev: "We will ´Barry´ you"?

If there ever was a reason for the Second Amendment, it is to stop this tyrant, this totalitarian monsterosity, this vain, creepy, life killing domestic terrorist, his handlers and cohorts. When this traitor comes to justice, in this life or the next, there will be hell to pay.


Reply 45 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/9/2013 1:13:46 PM     (No. 9107181)

The question is why should anyone purchase expensive health care insurance until they get sick, as then they can purchase a Cadillac policy without suffering any penalty as the insurance companies must accept them and their preexisting conditions?

Maybe the object of the liberal Democrats from the beginning was to use Obama Care as a stepping stone to a single payer national health insurance government run social program for all the common folks, allowing a very high quality private system to exist for the politicians and the other elite rich and famous who can pay for their own health insurance.


Reply 46 - Posted by: zazu, 1/9/2013 2:07:44 PM     (No. 9107319)

BINGO!! #3. That is exactly right. In fact, not buying into insurance that is available from your employer and then signing up after you are ill is considered insurance fraud. A felony...I suppose that does not matter with OOcare.

Another point, after having worked in the insurance industry for 30 years I can tell you that no company can operate on a 20% above actual claims margin and survive. The typical expense ration is in the 30-35% range. The purpose of this requirement is to drive all the private carriers out of business, period!!

LHT


Reply 47 - Posted by: peasantnumberthree, 1/9/2013 2:19:58 PM     (No. 9107356)

I still think that Chief Justice Roberts voted the way he did on Obamacare was due to the Dims having pictures of him doing something naughty.

If he didn´t do anything naughty, then the Dims would just Photoshop something, like they did for his "birth certificate."

It´s the Chicago Way...


Reply 48 - Posted by: johngalt1, 1/9/2013 2:54:36 PM     (No. 9107417)

Let’s stop using the phrases “low information voter” and “single-payer” health care plan. They are both very misleading descriptions.

Way back in 1982, John Naisbet wrote a book entitled “Megatrends” in which he said “We are drowning in information but starved for knowledge.” And this was a full decade before the internet became a vast, instant information resource for billions of people.

Today, if you lack information, it’s because you don’t want it. People who decline the opportunity to become informed are ignorant by choice. They believe they already have all the information they need. They don’t want to be educated.

So-called “low information voters” are really drones guided remotely on election day by whichever politician or party is the most skillful at pushing their buttons by “spinning” issues to reinforce a drones’ preexisting mindset.

It’s been said that if a lie is repeated often enough people will believe it. Can the same be said for the truth? If so, why is it that when a politician tells the truth it’s referred by the press to as a gaffe?

As for describing a government funded/government managed national health care monopoly merely as a “single-payer” system: it helps the socialist cause because it doesn’t do enough to warn voters that such systems prohibits individuals from purchasing private insurance so they are stuck with the level of health care service government bureaucrats—not doctors or patients—deem affordable and appropriate. Doctor shortages; long waits for appointments, treatments and surgeries; and death panels, anyone?


Reply 49 - Posted by: OhMy, 1/9/2013 3:03:53 PM     (No. 9107438)

Thank you #47. Since you work in the insurance industry perhaps you could give data to support another point. I have heard that the overall profitability of the insurance industry is modest compared to other business. While Obama demonizes them and makes "profit" a dirty word the insurance industry is quite efficient and competative in providing this service. The government may not show a profit in doing the same thing but its officers are paid huge salaries and pensions so the final cost is much higher than in the private sector. We need to keep making the point that profit is cheaper and better than government control and pay scales. Government also cuts benefits in the VA much more than private companies. John Roberts chickened out # 48 because he was threatened with lots of nasty press. He want to have nice things said about him - a fatal flaw which should disqualify anyone for that job!


Reply 50 - Posted by: caddyjak, 1/9/2013 3:11:06 PM     (No. 9107454)

Speaking of "insurance fraud", isn´t that what tripped up our flotus and forced her to surrender her law license before being tossed in the cross bar Hilton.


Reply 51 - Posted by: shamus, 1/9/2013 4:52:27 PM     (No. 9107635)

Normally you are able to sign up for insurance only once a year in group plans. If you decline coverage one year, get sick, and accept coverage the next year, this is not any kind of fraud. It would be fraud if you gave false information when applying for insurance, but it would typically be handled as a civil matter. I doubt if it there are many cases of criminal fraud being charged simply for making false statements in a health insurance application.

As for the profit margins of health insurers, Yahoo finance shows United Health with a 5% profit margin. This is higher than a grocery store, which might make only a 1% profit margin, but much lower than a tech company like Microsoft which makes a profit margin of 21%.


Reply 52 - Posted by: oldsfc, 1/9/2013 5:23:52 PM     (No. 9107700)

Actually, the real reason obamacare will fail is very simple. No doctors. Doctors, like the rest of us, do not work for free. Wage levels reflect ones skills and abilities. I see, in time, a government health system when the care givers are second or third string performers. A two tier medical system will develop, pay for service care and the government system. The prospect of seeing a doctor who graduated from the university of "what up?" does not appeal to me.


Reply 53 - Posted by: hamrman, 1/9/2013 6:11:04 PM     (No. 9107787)

Obamacare is unsustainable period end of discussion!


Reply 54 - Posted by: Rafter, 1/9/2013 6:51:56 PM     (No. 9107844)

Obama could be a very hated Wannabe Commie Dicktater...

by the time the 2014 midterms take place.

We have to oust him before it´s too late.
Cain´t hardly wait.


Reply 55 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 1/9/2013 7:27:21 PM     (No. 9107905)

I´ll be dipped. concern now about the money? What the...


Reply 56 - Posted by: virbots, 1/9/2013 7:35:34 PM     (No. 9107914)

Wow! Mandated extra benefits didn´t cause prices to drop? Who would have known?


Reply 57 - Posted by: Aria, 1/9/2013 11:43:00 PM     (No. 9108190)

The SEIU was the ultiimate purpose of Obamacare. Trash the whole system, the government seizes it and unionizes all the workers. Ergo..a steady supply of dues to keep the rats in power forever.

Obama is transforming us from a nation of relatively free people to a bunch of serfs while smiling in our faces. This is the very worst to ever happen to us.



Post Reply   Close thread 718192




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



How America Lost
Its Four Great Generals
Commentary Magazine, by Max Boot    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 3:01:19 PM     Post Reply
The quasi-official ideology of the U.S. armed forces holds that generals are virtually interchangeable, that individual personalities don’t matter much, that ordinary grunts are in any case more important than their leaders, and that what really counts are larger systems that make a complex bureaucracy function. There is some truth to all of this. But for all of the bureaucratic heft of the services and the heroism of ordinary soldiers, it is hard to imagine the Civil War having been won without Grant, Sherman, and Sheridan—or World War II without Marshall, Eisenhower, Patton, Bradley, Arnold, LeMay, Nimitz, Halsey,

King of Fearmongers
Weekly Standard, by Charlotte Allen    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 2:56:23 PM     Post Reply
Last August a 28-year-old gay-rights volunteer named Floyd Corkins entered the office lobby of the Family Research Council (FRC), a Christian traditional-values group headquartered in Washington that condemns homosexual conduct and opposes same-sex marriage. Corkins took a gun from his backpack and fired three shots at building manager Leo Johnson, one of them wounding the unarmed Johnson in the arm before he wrested the gun from Corkins. On February 6 Corkins pleaded guilty to three felonies: committing an act of terrorism while armed, interstate transportation of a firearm and ammunition

Grapevine man went to great
lengths to cover up dual marriages
Star-Telegram [Ft. Worth, TX], by Deanna Boyd    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 1:36:14 PM     Post Reply
FORT WORTH -- For 21/2 years, Germain Gardea kept his wives in the dark. The 38-year-old flight instructor spent weekdays in Arlington with his first wife, Jennifer Saldivar, and their young son. On weekends, he left town for his job as an instructor at a flight school, residing in Grapevine with his second wife, Leslie Gardea, who traveled during the week. To keep the women from finding out about each other, he created fake divorce documents on the Internet and filed his first wife´s taxes, marking her as single without her knowledge. But the deception came crashing down in May after Leslie Gardea

Is the U.S. becoming
a sham democracy?
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 6:04:56 AM     Post Reply
Eliana Johnson reports that four Republican members of the Senate Judiciary — Jeff Sessions, Chuck Grassley, Mike Lee, and Ted Cruz — are calling for transparency from their GOP colleagues in the “Gang of Eight” that is drafting immigration reform legislation. In a letter to John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio, and Jeff Flake, the four Judiciary Committee members express concern that an immigration reform bill will be rushed through Congress without proper oversight in the form of hearings and robust debate. They note that the Gang has “secretly met for months” without consulting

Fight for the right
to grow raisins
USA Today, by James Bovard    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 6:00:51 AM     Post Reply
The Supreme Court could soon end one of the federal government´s most archaic practices. Since the 1930s, the Agriculture Department has turned California raisin growers into pawns of its Raisin Administrative Committee, which can commandeer up to half of the farmer´s crop and then pay them little or nothing for the product. Marvin Horne, a 67-year-old raisin farmer in Fresno, Calif., was fined almost $700,000 for refusing to surrender control of much of his harvest to the government committee in 2002. Horne, who has been growing raisins for more than 40 years,

Dirty pols sink Andy
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:55:50 AM     Post Reply
There are many who scoff at Andrew Cuomo’s chances in a presidential primary campaign, but I am not among them. His name is an iconic Democratic brand, he’s forceful on the stump and a prodigious fund-raiser. Besides, somebody has to win the nomination. Of course, there are hurdles. Saint Hillary is gearing up to run, and there will be a scrum among contenders, probably including Vice President Joe Biden, competing just to be Clinton’s top rival. The scenario, then, is daunting but doable — or at least it was,

Discovery Of A 17th Century Spanish
Shipwreck Yields Awesome Treasure
LiveScience, by Marc Lallinilla    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:40:58 AM     Post Reply
A great superpower, weakened by economic calamity at home and staggering under the debt from years of war in the Middle East, finally collapses. A new political best-seller, or an apocalyptic Hollywood blockbuster? Neither — it´s the story told by a 1622 shipwreck whose treasures were desperately needed to shore up the finances of the struggling Spanish Empire. The galleon Buen Jesus y Nuestra Senora del Rosario was one of 28 ships in the Tierra Firme fleet; all were sailing from the New World back to Spain, laden with colonial treasures,

How the ´indispensable man´ became
America´s only six-star general
Washington Examiner, by Joseph Dooley    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:35:55 AM     Post Reply
Historian James Thomas Flexner referred to George Washington as "the indispensable man." Americans all know he was a general, but have you ever wondered what grade of general? How many stars did Gen. Washington have? In today´s Army, a one-star general is a brigadier; two stars is a major general; three stars is a lieutenant general; four stars is just plain general. During World War II, Congress created the five-star general, the modern rank of general of the Army. There had been an earlier grade that was called general of the Army,

South Korea has already won
Washington Post, by Max Fisher    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:26:19 AM     Post Reply
On March 30, three days after North Korea severed a military hotline with the South and announced that South Korean President Park Geun-hye “will meet a miserable ruin,” the country declared a state of war. “The time has come to stage a do-or-die final battle,” an official statement said. Meanwhile, many of South Korea’s youth were worried about something else. A 25-year-old pop star named Seo In-guk had appeared on a popular reality TV show the night before and, in a misstep that quickly dominated online conversations, had washed his strawberries incorrectly. Ilbe, a conservative Web forum —

The Rutgers Scandal Now Has
an F.B.I. Extortion Investigation
Atlantic, by Connor Simpson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:18:30 AM     Post Reply
If you had an extortion investigation in your "what twists the Rutgers basketball scandal will take next" pool, well, collect your winnings. Also, buy a lottery ticket because you may be telepathic. Because the F.B.I. is investigating Eric Murdock, the whistleblowing former assistant coach, for extortion. University officials let it slip to The New York Times´ Steve Eder that Federal Bureau of Investigation officers recently visited the campus and met with athletic director Tim Pernetti sometime before Pernetti was fired on Friday. They´re trying to determine whether or not Murdock, the former director of player development,

Hollywood’s Come to Jesus Moment?
American Spectator, by Marta H. Mossberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:07:42 AM     Post Reply
Imagine the pitch to a History Channel executive for the smash hit The Bible. Here’s one scenario: Producers Roma Downey and Mark Burnett: “Hi, we want to produce a story that appeals to all age groups. It’s has everything: love, lust, greed, war, self-sacrifice and redemption. It’s called ‘The Bible.’” Executive: “Could you repeat that? You said ‘The Bible’?” RD and MB: “Yes – we want to retell the Bible for this generation. And we think we can make money doing it. We’ve done a lot of market research —there is no competition out there.”

Rolling Out
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:04:35 AM     Post Reply
Since the Shermans of General Patton´s Third Army crossed the Rhine on March 22, 1945, there have been American tanks in Germany. No more, as John Vandiver of Stars and Stripes reports. The U.S. Army’s 69-year history of basing main battle tanks on German soil quietly ended last month when 22 Abrams tanks, a main feature of armored combat units throughout the Cold War, embarked for the U.S. The departure of the last M-1 Abrams tanks coincides with the inactivation of two of the Army’s Germany-based heavy brigades.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
69 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

65 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

63 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

42 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

41 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

Broadcasters worry
about ´Zero TV´ homes

41 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM     Post Reply
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from

Christians, here´s why we´re
losing our religion

41 replie(s)
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM     Post Reply
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”

The Secrets of Princeton
39 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for


Post Reply   Close thread 718192





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS