 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Sarah Palin’s Brother: From Alaska, He Can See a Third, `American Party’
Bloomberg News, by Don Frederick
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:MissMolly, 1/8/2013 1:17:12 PM
|
| There’s a new voice in the Palin family making the call for political upheaval, with Sarah’s brother — Chuck Heath Jr. — calling for “the disgruntled citizens of the United States… Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians… persons of every race, religion, economic status, and whoever else is interested, join together and form a new party.” He adds, in a posting on his Facebook page: “I’d simply call it, the American Party. ” Heath — who on a personal website identifies himself as “father, teacher, author” and “Alaskan gold miner” — may want to work on that name.
|
Comments: Unfortunately, George Wallace also claimed The American Party. Maybe another tag would be better.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Pam, 1/8/2013 1:34:12 PM (No. 9105277)
Anybody laid claim to the USA Party.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Rafter, 1/8/2013 1:41:47 PM (No. 9105297)
Yawn.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Stopstoreload, 1/8/2013 1:43:19 PM (No. 9105301)
No third party. It is an idiotic idea.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
dman, 1/8/2013 2:09:54 PM (No. 9105369)
Idiotic, #3??? Conservatives pin their hopes on the GOP "leadership" over and again - like Charlie Brown and Lucy´s football - and consistently get shunted aside once they have been properly "used" by the elites. Remember that the GOP was itself a "third party".
Of course, you´ll be quick to point out the Perot effort and the Reform Party. That failed because it started from "zero", with no elected politicians jumping over to give it some gravitas; it was a "top down" operation with all decisions made in Dallas; and its POTUS candidate "flaked out" at the last minute (because someone got to him?).
A better model is the NY Conservative party, which acts as a ballast on the state Republican Party. It often endorses GOP candidates who adhere to conservative principles, keeping the party honest.
It´s futile to start from "zero", and unnecessary. Time for conservatives in Congress and in state offices to switch. A new party needs to reflect the Tea Party model, and engage citizens in the process from the local level up. It can act as a pressure point in the short-term, endorsing conservative candidates in other parties, until it achieves critical mass.
We need to remember what Einstein said about "insanity". Time to try something different. There is a political void to be filled.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
tappin52, 1/8/2013 2:09:59 PM (No. 9105370)
As the Republican Party has made it clear that they have a problem with the conservative point of view, a third party is not a stupid idea. They can not win without us, and if I have no voice with them, then my vote will go elsewhere.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Refried, 1/8/2013 2:15:50 PM (No. 9105379)
Dittos to what poster # 5 said.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
noproblems, 1/8/2013 2:28:49 PM (No. 9105403)
it should be called the american renaissance party
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
MissMolly, 1/8/2013 2:32:40 PM (No. 9105416)
Hmmmmm...let´s see.....wonder who should head up this effort?
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Susannah, 1/8/2013 2:34:29 PM (No. 9105422)
"American Renaissance" is already taken, #8. I don´t think we´re allowed to post from their website.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
lakerman1, 1/8/2013 2:46:57 PM (No. 9105457)
In NY State, a political party´s name cannot contain the word American or America. George Wallace found that out in 1968.
But a third party would guarantee the continued dominance of the far left democrats. Not a good idea right now. Better to find and support conservative republican candidates, who know how to campaign. And know when to shut up.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
chumley, 1/8/2013 2:52:14 PM (No. 9105470)
#5 is right on the money. The gop is too far gone for redemption. No matter what they call this new party, I will give them a serious look.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
chumley, 1/8/2013 2:55:41 PM (No. 9105478)
Thats what I get for reading too fast. I like half of #5´s. Returning to the starting line is a good thing if your horse has been running backwards.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 1/8/2013 2:58:27 PM (No. 9105484)
Perhaps this would be a trial balloon worth floating: “The Common Sense Party”
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
absalom, 1/8/2013 3:01:58 PM (No. 9105491)
Way overdue but of course the Republicrat goobers will be apoplectic. Last election we had a real unemployment rate > 16%; not experienced since the Depression and doofus Romney, the choice of the R establishment, managed to lose decisively. But the party of Hoover, Landon, Wilkie, Dewey, Stassen, Dole, the Bush buffoons, Mcain, ect; insists ´we don´t need no stinkin change´. The hapless GOP is way, way past its expiry date.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Alecto2, 1/8/2013 3:11:45 PM (No. 9105515)
The country/world will be in such a mess by 2015, a new third party will emerge.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
heartlandconservative, 1/8/2013 3:24:43 PM (No. 9105537)
Constitutional Party of the Republic, or CPR for short. If the Republic does not need it now, it will shortly.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Immanuel Goldstein, 1/8/2013 3:38:48 PM (No. 9105562)
Has the Bull Moose Party been used?
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Stopstoreload, 1/8/2013 3:52:58 PM (No. 9105595)
Second post: How many years or decades will it take a third party to jump from 0 votes to more than 50 million votes? That is how years we´ll lose control of the government to the evil D´s.
Idiotic is idiotic.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 1/8/2013 3:55:33 PM (No. 9105597)
Buh bye, toodles, Ariva derci, chow, Bon voyage, hasta lavista, have a good one. Forget going rogue, go Larouche!
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
noddy, 1/8/2013 4:15:52 PM (No. 9105626)
AIM -- Americans In Motion The name is less important than the action. Frankly who would have thought Hope and Change, followed by Forward, would have made it.
The Tea Party is a fairly well organized group. I would like to see it testing the waters by talking to conservatives, which may include politicians. Certain rules need to be created, for example, term limits, identical health and pension plans as the people, no lobbyists.
And waiting until 24 months before the next presidential election will get us nowhere. Action needs to start immediately after Obama is sworn in, as in the following day. Gives serious thinkers just a couple of weeks.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Dallasobg, 1/8/2013 6:27:16 PM (No. 9105845)
No. This will hand the dims power from here to kingdom come. We have to replace our Repub leadership. In house races. Governors. Senators. State houses. This will take time and patience but a third party for us spells doom.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Penney, 1/8/2013 6:28:02 PM (No. 9105846)
Never thought i´d see the day but right now hubby & I are both pretty dissolutioned with the GOP pols. Why do the cave to 0bama´s irresponsible spending policies and why is Lindsey Graham nearly the only one out there in the media speaking for the GOP? ...When even both Show Me state U.S. Senators, Blunt(R?) & McCaskill(D!) vote for more & more 0bama spending bills, which they haven´t even read, it is quite alarming.
|
| |
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"
|
|
Fashion designer Lilly Pulitzer dies at 81
|
|
Associated Press, by Jennifer Kay
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/7/2013 4:46:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
MIAMI -- Lilly Pulitzer hosted parties in her bare feet and wasn´t afraid to get a little messy - just as long as she looked good and had fun, too. In the late 1950s, the Palm Beach socialite had time to spare and a wealthy husband who owned citrus groves, so she opened an orange juice stand just off the island´s main shopping street. Pulitzer needed to hide all the juice stains on her clothes,though. Instead of just putting on an apron, she asked her seamstress to make some sleeveless dresses
|
Still OK to withdraw welfare benefits at ATMs in Colorado strip clubs
|
|
Daily Caller, by Greg Campbell
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/7/2013 5:49:05 AM
Post Reply
|
|
An attempt by Colorado lawmakers to ban welfare recipients from withdrawing their benefits at ATMs located inside strip clubs was killed by Democrats Thursday night, even though the state House’s third-ranking Democratic legislator supported the measure. Democratic Rep. Dan Pabon lent his support to the Republican-led proposal, offered as an amendment during a debate on the state budget Thursday night, because it would hew to a similar federal rule, according to the Denver Post. Pabon introduced a bill on the issue two years ago, but it didn’t clear the state Senate. State welfare recipients receive their benefits
|
|
Cruel founding fathers
|
|
Boston Herald, by Howie Carr
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/7/2013 5:31:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Add the name of Michelle Lynne (ne Robert) Kosilek to the list of modern phenomena the Founding Fathers would definitely not appreciate being blamed for. Little did they know what havoc they would someday wreak by adding the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution to prohibit “cruel and unusual punishment.” Now comes Kosilek, a convicted wife murderer doing life without parole. He/she is claiming that it would be cruel and unusual punishment to deny him/her a sex-change operation — excuse me, “gender-reassignment surgery.”Not to get too graphic, but Kosilek is begging for elective amputation of a body part.
|
Can We Get Hillary Without the Foolery?
|
|
New York Times, by Maureen Dowd
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/7/2013 5:14:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
PLEASE don’t ask me this anymore. It’s such a silly question. Of course Hillary is running. I’ve never met a man who was told he could be president who didn’t want to be president. So naturally, a woman who’s told she can be the first commandress in chief wants to be. “Running for president is like sex,” James Carville told me. “No one ever did it once and forgot about it.” Joe Biden wants the job. He’s human (very). But he’s a realist. He knows the Democratic Party has a messianic urge to finish what it started
|
|
Doom and gloom
|
|
New York Post, by John Crudele
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/6/2013 3:50:23 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Two very bad and extremely dangerous economic developments happened yesterday — and Wall Street appeared to miss both of them. The Dow Jones industrial average fell 40.86 points to 14565.25 after the Labor Department announced that the seasonally adjusted number of new jobs created in March was just 88,000 — far below the 190,000 or so Wall Street expected. The March figure was also less than one-third the number of jobs created during February. This led to the misperception that the job market tanked in March. It didn’t.
|
Duck Dynasty Must Make Liberals Crazy
|
|
American Spectator, by Benjamin Brophy
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/5/2013 6:06:07 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Duck Dynasty must make liberals heads explode. It is now the most popular “non-scripted” show currently on television. Its Season 3 premiere had 8.6 million viewers and a massive 4.0 rating in the 18-49 demographic, which as you might know, is quite popular with the advertisers. At the same time, each episode ends with the entire family at the dinner table where they pray before eating. Indeed, the Robertson clan is entirely evangelical. They take their faith in Christ seriously and exert quite a bit of effort preaching the gospel. The patriarch of the family, Phil, used to live
|
|
Obama´s Harris ´compliment´ backfires
|
|
Politico, by Jonathan Allen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/5/2013 5:56:52 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Ohio’s Mike DeWine, Alabama’s Luther Strange and Georgia’s Sam Olens, eat your hearts out: President Barack Obama thinks California’s Kamala Harris is the belle of the ball among the nation’s top government lawyers. “She’s brilliant and she’s dedicated, she’s tough … She also happens to be, by far, the best looking attorney general,” Obama said at a Democratic National Committee luncheon in Atherton, Calif., Thursday. “It’s true! C’mon.” Obama’s remark set the chattering class atwitter. Certainly, Obama meant no insult, but in singling out Harris for her looks, Obama joins a long list of public figures
|
Peace processing again — this time from Kerry
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/5/2013 5:40:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
It must be something in the water at the State Department — every secretary sooner or later develops an insatiable yearning to be the guy or gal who finally unlocked the secret to Middle East peace. Now Kerry has the peace process bug. The State Department spokeswoman did her best to lower expectations. (“His diplomacy will be based on what he hears from the parties”), but it was hard to conceal what a fruitless endeavor this is. Indeed, it is downright bizarre that while North Korea is saber-rattling, the Syrian war sends reverberations through the region,
|
Fee? What fee? : The Met denies hiding free entry option from visitors
|
|
New York Post, by Bill Sanderson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/5/2013 5:25:59 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Art lovers, put away your wallets: In a surprise statement today, the Met said that it’s never tried to paint over rules requiring it to let anyone in for free. Lots of art connoisseurs know that the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s $25 admission charge is just a suggestion, and that you can get in by paying what you want, or nothing at all. But a lawsuit filed in state Supreme Court last November says the Met hides that policy from visitors. And two weeks ago, a former supervisor at the museum told The Post that he’d arranged for security officers
|
How to Survive a Sex Scandal: Mark Sanford Edition
|
|
Daily Beast, by David Freedlander
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/5/2013 5:17:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
How do you survive a sex scandal? Public-relations reps and crisis-communications counselors have made careers of dispensing advice on such matters. And so the usual counsel follows a fairly trite and untested path: Be honest from the start. Apologize. Make sure your wife stands behind you. Hogwash, for the most part. Everyone apologizes, nearly everyone’s wife is supportive, and no one is honest from the start. But still some politicians survive sordid situations, and some do not. Why? Let’s allow history to be our guide. There are more than enough examples to choose from. It was only Tuesday that former South Carolina governor
|
|
The Borking of Michele Bachmann
|
|
American Spectator, by Jeffrey Lord
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/4/2013 5:17:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Shocker. Having failed to end Congresswoman Michele Bachmann’s congressional career at the polls, the left is now moving to do it the old-fashioned way: Bork Bachmann unto political death. The problem? This really is the old-fashioned way. And any conservative even semi-awake recognizes the game instantly. In this case the game being played with the so-called Office of Congressional Ethics, the OCE. This is what we now call “Borking.” The method of choice of liberals when they are frustrated by the public’s attachment or potential attachment to a political figure on the Right.
|
King Barack: “I Am Constrained By A System That Our Founders Put In Place” (Video)
|
|
Gateway Pundit, by Jim Hoft
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/4/2013 3:50:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Barack Obama taunted gun owners and complained to supporters yesterday, “I am constrained by a system our founders put in place.” CBS Local reported: Ratcheting up pressure for Congress to limit access to guns, President Barack Obama said Wednesday that recent steps by Colorado to tighten its gun laws show “there doesn’t have to be a conflict” between keeping citizens safe and protecting Second Amendment rights to gun ownership. “I believe there doesn’t have to be a conflict in reconciling these realities,” Obama said in Denver, where he stepped up his call for background checks
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
McCain: ´I don´t understand´ GOP filibuster on guns
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"
|
Hillary Clinton Would Not ´Clear the Field´ for 2016
|
|
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
White House Blames Jobs Numbers on Sequester
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
Obama Budget to Cap Retirement Accounts at $3 Million
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 9:40:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts. According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals "to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving." "The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per
|
| | |
|