A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Note to Conservatives:
It’s the Media, Stupid!

Newsbusters, by Matthew Sheffield

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/4/2013 7:57:39 AM

If you are reading this blog post, you are in a minority of your fellow citizens in several ways. Firstly, you actually care about politics. Most Americans do not. Secondly, you care enough about being informed about political issues that you actually are interested in going out of your way to read up on conservative positions. Thirdly, if you are a conservative reading NewsBusters, you are further in the minority because you actually understand that media and culture actually control the political environment. Unfortunately, most conservatives have failed to understand this. And it is the reason

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Susannah, 1/4/2013 8:12:46 AM     (No. 9097880)

Sheffield is right. You can´t get your message out if you have no means to transmit it. I don´t know how many times I´ve said this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: starboard, 1/4/2013 8:16:47 AM     (No. 9097889)

Exactamente!


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: graniteman2009, 1/4/2013 8:19:32 AM     (No. 9097892)

#1..You hit the nail right on the head. Until the GOP plays the same game as the Dem´s and uses Alinsky´s rules against them we will be hosed..


Reply 4 - Posted by: MOBeef4u, 1/4/2013 8:33:17 AM     (No. 9097929)

Sheffield has defined the problem well, but, in practical terms, what is the solution?
Many on these threads castigate Repubs for not fighting back. My question is: How would you know whether they did or not?


Reply 5 - Posted by: harleynyc, 1/4/2013 8:34:53 AM     (No. 9097934)

Assuming that media and culture control the political environment makes for a nice article for us to read, it is not what made obama win the election.
He won this, and every election he ever won by implementing VOTER FRAUD.


Reply 6 - Posted by: cgood, 1/4/2013 8:41:04 AM     (No. 9097947)

Obama won re-election through a combination of fraud and an uninformed electorate. We will have to solve both of these problems to take our country back. Like it or not, the Republican party is our best vehicle to accomplish what needs to be done, but I haven´t seen any indication that they plan to address either issue.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 1/4/2013 8:41:15 AM     (No. 9097948)

Thank you! Thank you! Thank you, Matthew Sheffield for expressing so eloquently much, and a great deal more, of what I’ve been pondering for years but have sorely lacked the ability to express it myself.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Urgent Fury, 1/4/2013 8:46:17 AM     (No. 9097957)

Same here #8. Simply being right isn´t enough. We thought the blog/talk show movement would counter the "old media". But it hasn´t, enough.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Susannah, 1/4/2013 9:01:44 AM     (No. 9097998)

If I may make a second post, the problem with blogs and talk shows is that they preach to the converted. Rush Limbaugh may have a cast audience, but 99.9% of it agrees with him already.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Susannah, 1/4/2013 9:02:23 AM     (No. 9098002)

Make that "vast," not "cast."


Reply 11 - Posted by: simple simon, 1/4/2013 9:02:53 AM     (No. 9098005)

but....but.....I see John McCain and Lindsey Graham on the Sunday shows all the time!


Reply 12 - Posted by: Rakasha, 1/4/2013 9:10:57 AM     (No. 9098029)

Overhaul the conservative movement? Ah, to the center-right, where the smart conservatives live. I get it.

No thank you, Mr. Sheffield. Many of us are aware that the media are not irrelevant; they are in fact armed combatants. We need to engage them. Don´t give them soundbites to play with, twist and reinterpret. Go on their tv shows LIVE, and don´t pull punches. Don´t put up with biased debate techniques or biased moderators. Call them on it - then and there. Walk out if necessary. Unfortunately, this requires both a willingness to put oneself in harm´s way - to actually fight for something - and an understanding of what one is fighting for.

There are many other ways to get our message out - and don´t discount twitter, facebook and youtube - but they all require the willingness to pay a price, and we seem to have too few in the political arena who actually believe that anything is worth that extreme.

Or maybe it´s that they don´t really know anymore what they are fighting for. The ´conservative movement´, as represented by the Republican Party, is no longer clear on its message or what it stands for. If you can´t express who you are, it doesn´t matter if you can get the public to hear you or not.



   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Sunhan65, 1/4/2013 9:13:35 AM     (No. 9098036)

I strongly agree this article and poster #1. Conservatives need to understand this reality and act accordingly. The first enemy every conservative faces is the ideological opposition of the liberal media complex. The mainstream press determines what stories are chosen and how they are reported, and its power to set the agenda and frame the debate in liberal terms cannot be overstated. As far as conservatism is concerned, the liberal media is the anti-message.

Conservatives must find ways to speak truth through that power. It follows that we need conservative candidates who have the courage of their convictions and the rhetorical skill to fight the media first and win. The liberal media will always hate conservatives, but it is possible to make them fear our candidates. Reporters hate looking stupid on YouTube.

Last year there were two Republican politicians who took the media on, head on, and won: Chris Christie and Newt Gingrich. Christie is not reliably conservative, and Gingrich had too much baggage. Whomever we choose next time must 1. Control our message (no more screw ups like Akin etc.), 2. Make guys like the Williams twins (Juan and Brian) afraid to ask stupid, dishonest questions.


Reply 14 - Posted by: jeffkinnh, 1/4/2013 9:37:46 AM     (No. 9098092)


Reply 15 - Posted by: MisterDickens, 1/4/2013 9:44:54 AM     (No. 9098107)

Several posters have hit on what, in my opinion, is the main issue. The media is the enemy. They run or actually "are" the democrat party. The Republicans have to run against the media.

I can´t stand John McCain but for a while he ran against the media and was doing quite well. Suddenly he stopped running against the media and his campaign fell apart.

A good street fighter will whip a black belt every time because he cheats. The media are street fighters and the Pubs play by the rules. Until they get in the gutter, they will continue to lose.


Reply 16 - Posted by: jeffkinnh, 1/4/2013 9:54:57 AM     (No. 9098125)

FTA: most voters actually have no idea what the conservative position on taxes and the deficit is. By and large, they have no idea what the conservative arguments on any issue are thanks to the fact that 90+ percent of the American media elite are hard-left partisan Democrats. There can be no message without a medium. Conservative position papers are only slightly more relevant to the average American than that tree falling in the forest that no one ever hears.

Exactly true as far as it goes. How do reach a public that does not care about politics, is uninformed, and does not understand that pop culture information is NOT reliable? The public tunes out meaningful messages, even if delivered through pop culture. They want saccharin sweet "good" messages that tell them that the goobermint is going to take care of their education, housing, car, health, retirement ... pretty much their whole life. Rational people KNOW this is impossible. But the public now expects it because the progressives and media say they can deliver it. No progressive state has ever succeeded in doing so but it sounds real nice, now doesn´t it.

So Conservatives may need to build a media network to deliver the message but what message will they deliver to the knuckleheads that reelected BO? Responsibility? Less government? These people don´t want that and can´t envision being self reliant. They think the world is rigged against them and that they can only succeed when someone like BO hands things to them. The Conservative message is an anathema to them.

So good luck with a bigger, better PA system. Your intended audience has earplugs.


Reply 17 - Posted by: roger h. cook,MD, 1/4/2013 10:31:46 AM     (No. 9098214)

All along since JFK I thought all the media was owned by th democrats ,which isn´t?


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: curious1, 1/4/2013 10:42:00 AM     (No. 9098244)

Well, one solution is buy up controlling interest in the stock of the media company, clean out the board, then the executives, and fire every ´journalist´ who doesn´t whole-heartedly get on-board with telling all the facts and scrutinizing the LPs with a 24/7 microscope. Sort-of reality TV in the LP gutter, the LIVs would be fascinated in spite of themselves.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Quaestio, 1/4/2013 10:42:33 AM     (No. 9098245)

Actually, it´s more than the media. Conservatives have retreated from every critical area - media, education, law schools, and the bureaucratic pipeline that extends from public administration schools to the millions of regulatory posts across the country. The left has created a system where their world view is broadcast by the media, taught in the schools, and put into practice. Until conservatives take a stand in these other areas as well, nothing will change. Just stop by and see what new regulations are being piled on in builders in your local community. I guarantee they are being written by leftists.


Reply 20 - Posted by: M Stuart, 1/4/2013 10:56:04 AM     (No. 9098283)

What brought it home to me with a sledge hammer was the way the Glenn Beck rally in Washington was treated. IT WAS HUGE! But even on FOX it was not nearly as visual as it should have been, and it was almost ignored on the alphabets. And it was grossly under-estimated in its size. Therefore, it was nothing to the majority of America.

Compare the saturation mostly positive coverage of a few Code Pink nuts. Or Occupy Wall Street.

If you can´t communicate and get attention, you fail.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Muguy, 1/4/2013 11:28:24 AM     (No. 9098367)

It is the media, Stupid!

But it is also: young people are so self-absorbed and don´t know or care a damn bit about the heritage of the great ideas of the Founders about the proper role of government.

The few who care are far outnumbered by wanting to know more about Kim Kardashian´s b*stard child pregnancy while she is STILL married to the basketball player.


Reply 22 - Posted by: toddh, 1/4/2013 11:46:39 AM     (No. 9098394)

The media is not radically left-wing. They are, at root, lazy and stupid. Find a general media story about a subject in which you´re an expert, and you´ll notice painful errors that wouldn´t have happened if the reporter had the tiniest bit of tenacity or curiosity. I´m not talking about deep field trivia, I mean just asking a simple follow-up!

The Left is also lazy and stupid. That is why they are natural allies with the media.

If the Republicans were to become more stupid and lazy than the Democrats, they would find the media on their side.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: NYbob, 1/4/2013 12:19:48 PM     (No. 9098452)

Lee Atwater understood how to play the media, but then supposedly had some kind of ´misgivings´ about being as manipulative as any media outlet in our lifetime. At any rate he knew which buttons to push and pushed some. The only other Republican to have a clue about how to handle a neocommunist press, was Reagan. He understood performance, delivery, the audience, critics and politics. Most of that knowledge was gained from a lifetime of real world maneuvering in the sleesyist, sickest, town in the world, next to DC, Hollywood.


Reply 24 - Posted by: canuckchopper, 1/4/2013 12:20:32 PM     (No. 9098453)

So why not get a good comedy show about how stupid the left´s ideas are?
Humor is the best weapon - we need someone who can do a series on how stupid they are. Sort of a reverse ´All in the Family´?


Reply 25 - Posted by: Hammock, 1/4/2013 1:14:02 PM     (No. 9098534)

If conservatives don´t control TV outlets the result will be the same.

Like any third-world country, the people love to have a demon, and the Republican Party is it. Generations have been raised on media snark, and "wittily" trashing the current demon is the accepted method of gaining status and bonding with one´s peers. Since much of the voting populace is ignorant, snark is going to be the only way to reach them. Conservatives must snark back, and make fun of the opposition, but that would take a few outlets not controlled by the opposition. Right now it´s easier for an on-the-make Republican to gain attention and support by trashing Republicans than to make sense.


Reply 26 - Posted by: tocsin, 1/4/2013 1:21:47 PM     (No. 9098542)

When you are afraid to lose (as are most pubbies on the taxpayer teat) you will kiss the media´s fannys.
If I were running for national office, I would school myself at the knees of Drs. Thomas Sowell & Walter E. Williams.



Post Reply   Close thread 717628




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Ariel Castro, Cleveland Kidnapper,
Is a Registered Democrat
American Thinker, by Oleg Atbashian    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/9/2013 7:28:47 AM     Post Reply
According to voter registration records, Ariel Castro, the Cleveland kidnapper, is a registered Democrat. He was also the alleged leader among the three Castro brothers, who were arrested this week, and the owner of the house at 2207 Seymour Ave., where the three abducted local women had been kept in captivity for over a decade. Why is this important? Whenever a crime or a scandal captures national attention, the pattern in the mainstream media is to either identify the culprit as a Republican or hold silence -- in which case we can rest assured that the culprit

Senate defeats expansion of gun rights
Washington Times, by Stephen Dinan    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:27:58 PM     Post Reply
The Senate beat back a new push to expand gun rights Wednesday, defeating a plan to let gun owners carry their weapons on federal lands in states where it would otherwise be legal. Still, Wednesday’s vote drew more support than last month’s efforts to impose new gun controls in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting, suggesting that Second Amendment supporters retain the momentum in the gun debate. The 56-43 vote was four shy of the 60 needed to be adopted under Senate rules. At stake was the ability

White House struggles to respond
to new Benghazi revelations
Washington Times, by Susan Crabtree    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:24:14 PM     Post Reply
The White House on Wednesday stood by its story that the Obama administration remained unsure exactly who was responsible for the attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi nearly five days after it occurred even though new revelations show Ansar al-Sharia’s direct involvement. Gregory Hicks, the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya and a self-described whistleblower, testified before a Congressional committee Wednesday that the body of Ambassador J. Christpher Stevens was missing for hours during the attack after being dragged out of the diplomatic post in Benghazi.

At Benghazi hearing, State
Dept. officials challenge
administration review of attacks
Washington Post, by Ernesto Londoño and Karen DeYoung    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:16:28 PM     Post Reply
Three State Department officials provided a riveting, emotional account of last year’s fatal attack on U.S. installations in eastern Libya on Wednesday as they charged senior government officials with withholding embarrassing facts and failing to take enough responsibility for security lapses. The testimony provided new details on the Sept. 11, 2012, assaults on U.S. installations in Benghazi and their aftermath. But the new information failed to break the political logjam the attacks spawned, with Republicans and Democrats offering starkly different interpretations of what happened and who within the U.S. government is to blame.

Obama’s false hopes for
2014 — and his legacy
Washington Post, by George F. Will    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:09:49 PM     Post Reply
Thirty-one months ago Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell affronted the media and other custodians of propriety by saying something common-sensical. On Oct. 23, 2010, he said: “The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.” He meant that America needed conservative change from the statist course of Obama’s presidency (the stimulus, Obamacare, etc.), therefore America needed a president who would not veto such change. By similar reasoning, Obama today could sensibly say, and probably has said to himself

7 Things We Learned from the
Benghazi Whistleblower Hearing
PJ Media, by Bryan Preston    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 10:56:03 PM     Post Reply
The Republicans mishandled the Benghazi whistleblowers’ hearing. What should have been stretched across several days to give the nation time to digest it all, was instead packed into a single day filled with an overwhelming amount of information. The media’s attention span is not that long. The verdict in the Jodi Arias trial came along in the afternoon and blew Benghazi off the networks, most of which didn’t want to cover it at all. Even Fox joined the drive-by media, taking Benghazi off the air in favor of the irrelevant Arias trial

The Benghazi Hearing:
Did It Matter?
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 10:52:32 PM     Post Reply
Today’s Benghazi hearing had many dramatic moments and added significantly to our knowledge of that disaster. For example, we now know that there were multiple instances when special ops would-be rescuers were told to stand down, leading Lt. Col. Gibson to tell Greg Hicks, “This is the first time in my career that a diplomat has more balls than somebody in the military.” Obvious questions remain to be answered: Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton hide behind the military, saying or implying that doing nothing to try to save the besieged Americans in Benghazi

Hillary Hasn’t Heard
the End of Benghazi
Commentary Magazine, by Jonathan S. Tobin    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 10:49:47 PM     Post Reply
Democrats arrived at the House Oversight Committee’s hearing on the Benghazi terror attack determined to defend the reputation of the person that most believe will be their presidential candidate in 2016. Ranking member Elijah Cummings and his colleagues thundered at Chair Darrel Issa and any other Republican who dared to raise questions about the way the State Department responded not only to the attack but also to questions about the aftermath, determined to cast the entire event as a partisan ambush. But the testimony of the three whistleblowers overshadowed their complaints

Benghazi Hearing Aims to Reveal
High Level Decision-Makers
Breitbart´s Big Peace, by Kerry Picket    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 8:28:16 AM     Post Reply
Republicans on the House Oversight Committee say there will be “explosive” revelations that will come forth during the Committee’s hearing on Wednesday when three State Department witnesses reveal what they knew the night the U.S. consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya were attacked by terrorists. Committee members will be hearing the testimonies of State Department employees Greg Hicks, Mark Thompson, and Eric Nordstrom. The Committee appears to be interested in finding out who ultimately made the decision to tell military assets not to send help

Obama says chemical use
in Syria is only ‘perceived’
Washington Times, by Susan Crabtree    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/7/2013 10:05:47 PM     Post Reply
President Obama defiantly defended his reluctance to increase the U.S.intervention in Syria, saying he has yet to receive clear, corroborated evidence to back up initial intelligence reports of small-scale use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime and would not make a decision based on a “hope and a prayer.” Mr. Obama last summer said chemical use by Syrian leader Bashar Assad would be a “red line” that would change his calculus about authorizing U.S. action in that country’s civil war. Reports last week suggested

As red ink recedes, pressure
fades for budget deal
Washington Post, by Lori Montgomery and Zachary A. Goldfarb    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/7/2013 10:03:45 PM     Post Reply
After four years of trillion-dollar deficits, the red ink is receding rapidly in Washington, easing pressure on policymakers but shattering hopes for a summertime budget deal. Federal tax revenue is up and spending is down thanks to an improving economy, tax hikes enacted in January and the automatic budget cuts known as the sequester. The sunnier outlook means that President Obama will be able to pay the nation’s bills for months without seeking additional borrowing authority from Congress — probably until Oct. 1, according to independent forecasts.

Graham: ‘I Think the Dam Is
About to Break on Benghazi’
Washington Free Beacon, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/7/2013 9:55:55 PM     Post Reply
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) wrote Tuesday he believes major revelations about the lead up to the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, are imminent, in a Facebook message: “I think the dam is about to break on Benghazi. We’re going to find a system failure before, during, and after the attacks. “We’re going to find political manipulation seven weeks before an election. We’re going to find people asleep at the switch when it comes to the State Department, including Hillary Clinton.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Putin keeps John Kerry waiting for
THREE HOURS during his visit to
Russia for meetings over Syria
as relationship between the U.S.
and Russia remains frosty

70 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/8/2013 2:10:01 AM     Post Reply
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry was looking to strengthen ties with Russia as he tries to put an end to the dictatorial regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, but instead he was met with the coldest of receptions. Russian President Vladimir Putin kept Kerry waiting three hours before their meeting at the Kremlin on Tuesday and continuously fiddled with his pen as the top American diplomat spoke about the ongoing crisis in Syria. Kerry’s visit to Moscow comes as he seeks Russian help in ending Syria´s civil, telling President Putin that common interest in a stable Middle East

Republican probe of Benghazi
attacks turns to Hillary Clinton

54 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Philip Rucker    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/8/2013 6:52:16 AM     Post Reply
Republican lawmakers, who have spent months seeking to tie President Obama to last year’s deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, are increasingly focusing their probe on a new target: former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton. The GOP-led investigation of the Sept. 11, 2012, assaults that killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others now centers heavily on the State Department and whether officials there deliberately misled the public about the nature of the assault. Three State Department officials are scheduled to testify before a House committee on Wednesday about the Benghazi attack and its aftermath.

Sanford gets second chance:
On political scrapheap 4 years ago,
ex-governor wins 1st district seat

44 replie(s)
Post & Courier [Charleston, SC], by Glenn Smith*    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/8/2013 12:59:28 AM     Post Reply
Former Gov. Mark Sanford completed the trail to political redemption Tuesday with a win over Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch to reclaim his old seat in Congress. Sanford defeated Colbert Busch 54 percent to 45 percent, according to full unofficial results. Turnout was heavier than expected, with about 32 percent of the district’s 455,702 registered voters casting ballots. Sanford, who has never lost an election, returns to the 1st District seat he held for three terms from 1995-2001. It’s a remarkable comeback for a man many pundits had written off after his highly publicized affair with an Argentine

A new ‘Dawn’ at ABC:
Newsman becomes newswoman

44 replie(s)
New York Post, by Tara Palmeri    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:26:11 AM     Post Reply
Top ABC News editor Don Ennis walked into his Manhattan office on Friday in a “little black dress” and a brunette bobbed wig and announced to colleagues that from now on, he would like to be known as Dawn. The 49-year-old father of three said he’s splitting from his wife of 17 years to become a woman, or Dawn Stacey Ennis, as she is now known on her governmental records. “Today I begin anew,” she wrote on her Facebook timeline, where she debuted a flirty new profile picture. “Please understand: This is not a game of

Dem Congressman At Benghazi
Hearing: "Death Is A Part Of Life"

43 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 2:27:15 PM     Post Reply
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, tells Benghazi witnesses that "death is a part of life." CUMMINGS: And, as I listen to your testimony I could not help but think of something that I said very recently -- two years ago now -- in a eulogy for a relative. I said that death is a part of life, so often we have to find a way to make life a part of death. And, I guess the reason why I´m saying that, going back to something Mr. Nordstrom said, he wanted,

Benghazi: Incompetence,
but no cover-up

42 replie(s)
National Journal, by Michael Hirsh    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/8/2013 6:04:54 PM     Post Reply
There was tragic incompetence, plainly, in the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi attacks, and even possibly some political calculation. It is a record that may well come to haunt Hillary Clinton, the first Secretary of State to lose an ambassador in the field in more than three decades, if she runs for president in 2016. But the obvious Republican effort to turn this inquiry into the Democratic (Obama) version of the Iraq intelligence scandal that has tarred the GOP since the George W. Bush years -- led by that least-credible of champions, the almost-always-wrong Darrell Issa --

White House struggles to respond
to new Benghazi revelations

41 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Susan Crabtree    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:24:14 PM     Post Reply
The White House on Wednesday stood by its story that the Obama administration remained unsure exactly who was responsible for the attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi nearly five days after it occurred even though new revelations show Ansar al-Sharia’s direct involvement. Gregory Hicks, the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya and a self-described whistleblower, testified before a Congressional committee Wednesday that the body of Ambassador J. Christpher Stevens was missing for hours during the attack after being dragged out of the diplomatic post in Benghazi.

Stephen Hawking backs
boycott of Israeli academics

39 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Gregory Katz and Aron Heller    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/8/2013 12:08:27 PM     Post Reply
British physicist Stephen Hawking has dropped plans to attend a major international conference in Israel in June, citing his belief that he should respect a Palestinian call to boycott contacts with Israeli academics. The University of Cambridge released a statement Wednesday indicating that Hawking had told the Israelis last week that he would not be attending "based on advice from Palestinian academics that he should respect the boycott." University officials said they had "previously understood" that Hawking´s decision was based solely on health concerns — he is 71 and has severe disabilities — but had now been told otherwise by Hawking´s office.

The High Cost of Rush: Talker
Bleeds Millions From His Carriers
as Toxic Talk Slumps, Cumulus Seems
Set to Part Ways With Rush Limbaugh

38 replie(s)
Daily Beast, by John Avlon    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/8/2013 5:41:29 AM     Post Reply
“We´ve had a tough go of it this last year,” Cumulus CEO Lew Dickey said Tuesday morning. “The facts are indisputable regarding the impact certain things have had on ad dollars." Dickey told analysts on the earnings call that his radio empire’s revenue was down $5.6 million in the first quarter of 2013 on top of a boatload of debt. Why? Parse the weasel words (“the impact of certain things”) and you’ll see that Dickey is blaming one man for the precipitous decline of right-wing talk radio’s profitability: Rush Limbaugh. El Rushbo is still a giant in the industry,

Fox Analyst Shreds ‘Cowardly,
Duplicitous’ Admin Over Benghazi:
‘Sacrificed American Lives For Politics’

38 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Meenal Vamburkar    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:47:07 AM     Post Reply
Ahead of the Benghazi hearings in which three witnesses are set to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade invited Fox News analyst Lt. Col. Ralph Peters to discuss the issue. Peters was unflinching in his criticism of the “cowardly” Obama administration — and the “establishment media” that aids it. “Is this a national security coverup?” Kilmeade asking, explaining that the witness testimony is expected to say the administration was deceitful in its handling of the situation. “The administration, facing the election, went into panic mode, wanted to contain it,”

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee: Constitution
implies a right to health care, education

36 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Douglas Ernst    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/7/2013 8:22:18 PM     Post Reply
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee took to the House floor Monday night and implied that the right to health care and education exists in the Constitution. Ms. Jackson Lee, Texas Democrat, also made the case that the moral authority for such services is also derived from the Declaration of Independence. “One might argue that education and health care fall into those provisions of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” she said. Ms. Jackson Lee added, “I think that what should be continuously emphasized is the president’s leadership on one single point: that although health care was not

Mark Sanford wins South
Carolina special election

36 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Rachel Weiner    Original Article
Posted By: supersid- 5/7/2013 8:55:20 PM     Post Reply
Mark Sanford has won the South Carolina special election in a competitive race for what in normal circumstances is a safe Republican seat. The former governor beat Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch, the sister of comedian Stephen Colbert Busch, for the state’s 1st congressional district. The AP called the race for Sanford early in the evening, with the Republican leading Colbert Busch 54 percent 46 percent.


Post Reply   Close thread 717628





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS