A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Tea party backers swallow a
bitter pill in ‘cliff’ bill

Washington Post, by David A. Fahrenthold*

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/1/2013 9:41:48 PM

The bill was 153 pages long. It was written only the day before, by Washington insiders working in the dark of night. It was crammed with giveaways and legislative spare parts: tax breaks for wind farms and race tracks. A change to nuclear-weapons policy. Government payments for cheese. And most significantly, the bill would raise taxes but do relatively little to cut government spending or the massive federal deficit. To a tea-party-influenced crop of House Republicans, the bill to resolve the “fiscal cliff” crisis was everything they had wanted to change about the way Washington worked.
Headline changed by source. Corrected by staff

Comments:
w/Rosalind S. Helderman and Ed O’Keefe.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: noproblems, 1/1/2013 9:47:05 PM     (No. 9093860)

cant wait to hear from the Repug apologizers trying to justify this. Same gullible people who voted for Romney, McCain, Bushes , Dole etc.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


Reply 2 - Posted by: bamapreacher, 1/1/2013 9:47:05 PM     (No. 9093861)

If the Republican members of Congress simply resigned en masse things really wouldn´t be any worse. They are merely ciphers and a waste of taxpayer´s money.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: noddy, 1/1/2013 9:52:32 PM     (No. 9093868)

Cheese. Really?


Reply 4 - Posted by: wws, 1/1/2013 10:46:05 PM     (No. 9093916)

Congratulations to all those reps who voted against Bohner´s plan B - turns out they all just guaranteed that we would get a deal that was even worse. Which is what everyone else said at the time.


Reply 5 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 1/1/2013 11:16:36 PM     (No. 9093947)

What nonsense. They knew this was coming, why wait until January 1 ?

The wasted tax dollars by our leaders is stupid and don´t even have a good excuse. I was so angry that I used Congress.org to write to them.


Reply 6 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 1/2/2013 2:45:33 AM     (No. 9094098)

The incoming House will have ten fewer Republicans but I suppose many of us will expect wonders of them as well. It can get worse you know. We could lose the House entirely in 2014.


Reply 7 - Posted by: NotaBene, 1/2/2013 3:09:03 AM     (No. 9094108)

This might be the time to start a third Party. We may lose the House because that is what Hussein demands of the mooching hordes. The Republican Party leader cannot be John Boehner because he was defeated. New blood is needed, probably a new Tea Party allied with the Republican Party for the selection of Speaker may do.

I am Sarah Palin.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: iamtinman, 1/2/2013 3:58:17 AM     (No. 9094119)

Every one of those scurvey "servants of the people" went to sleep tonight with a nice if undeserved pay raise and secure in the knowledge that they aren´t going to have to pay back the debt they just incurred. Your children on the other hand--


Reply 9 - Posted by: Ida Lil, 1/2/2013 4:29:42 AM     (No. 9094130)

if you read the bill you should note the Congressional pay raise bribe was turned down in the details.
Such a great lesson -- by turning down plan B for this one the increase is now higher.
About that third party . It would become 3 4 and 5th party with not one strong enough to elect a dog catcher because it takes team work and no candidate would be pure enough to please everyone of the factions.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Rather Read, 1/2/2013 6:30:16 AM     (No. 9094168)

My representative did not vote for this. Thank you sir. You are going to get a letter from me.


Reply 11 - Posted by: AnnaS, 1/2/2013 7:16:00 AM     (No. 9094212)

The ones that did not vote for it were "allowed" cover by Boehner! If he needed the vote they would have voted yes!


Reply 12 - Posted by: bubby, 1/2/2013 7:29:50 AM     (No. 9094234)

The Republican Party as constituted now wants to tax and spend just a tiny little bitty less than the Democrats. Those of us in the Tea Party wing want Government to tax and spend a whole lot less. I am fed up with the Republican Party what a bunch of spineless representatives we have in Congress. Even my Rep Brady from Texas voted for it what a disappointment. I guess fixing the Constitution and confiscation of our guns is next.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: O.S. Banker, 1/2/2013 7:42:52 AM     (No. 9094254)

For some reason that i cannot fathom, the press seems to think that this grand bill will suspend the fundamentals of economics, right our ship and provide calm seas for smooth sailing. Yet, this bill did not address the core problem, we are spending 30% more than we take in.

The debt will continue to grow, and our anemic recovery will fizzle as a result of capital being withdrawn from the private sector to pay increased taxes. While China has been a buyer of our debt, it has done so in order to support its exports to us. As our economy continues to contract, our purchases of consumer goods will contract as well.

Additionally, as the Euro-Zone dissentergrates, Germany will recover as it is decoupled from the PIIGS. The press can bray all the want about policy and Bills, but if the fundamentals remain flawed, there is no affirmative change.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 1/2/2013 7:45:25 AM     (No. 9094262)

I just did a quick check on the Tennessee delegation; Alexander and Corker (senate) voted FOR the bill. Our seven House members voted AGAINST it.


Reply 15 - Posted by: AnnaS, 1/2/2013 7:47:34 AM     (No. 9094266)

Mr O S Banker, if you had not noticed, the media is part of the Orwellian kabuki!


Reply 16 - Posted by: Sunhan65, 1/2/2013 7:59:01 AM     (No. 9094279)

I want the cliff back. I want anything that will stop the United States federal government from bankrupting us and the world. Sequestration had one huge advantage over what we have now: It did what no human being in Washington is capable of doing. It cut government spending.

Obama won this thing the moment the Republicans let him tie his tax increases to the sequestration cuts. The Republican position should have been: We need to stop government spending. Until we get a President and Senate that can pass a budget, we´re going to have do it the hard way. Sequestration stops spending, and that´s got to happen whether we like it or not. In the meantime, the President wants to raise taxes. We´ve tried to stop him, and passed multiple bills in the House to stop the Obama tax increases, but he refuses to listen. The President believes that raising tax rates will solve the spending crisis, so he´s going to do that. That´s his plan, not ours. We cut government spending; he raises your taxes. If you want even more taxes, vote for his party in 2014.


Reply 17 - Posted by: reilly, 1/2/2013 8:05:54 AM     (No. 9094293)


So "up the markets at all costs" rules. A deal to keep rates low on most taxpayers is better than nothing. But this is a pretty shabby performance all around.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 1/2/2013 8:06:12 AM     (No. 9094295)

Have we been conquered?

Well, have we?!!

I suspect we have, or that they THINK we have, but I am NOT ready to concede.

Grandma Wolverines Brigade, forming out here ... I refuse to be put behind the drive-in theater razor wire!


Reply 19 - Posted by: O.S. Banker, 1/2/2013 8:13:07 AM     (No. 9094303)

I am well aware of the roll the press has assigned for themselves (Cheerleaders-Democrats) but their capacity for denial is what truly astounds me. In personal terms, these clowns could take a 20% pay cut, and plan on maintaining their lifestyle with their Mastercard, indefinitely.


Reply 20 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 1/2/2013 8:20:21 AM     (No. 9094313)

All done with anything to do with the cliff thingie, signifying nothing, just buzz words. John did not have the support for Plan B which would have been better and I would not vote for the pubbies that sat on their hands.
BTW, why is sarah palin not just posting as sarah palin?


Reply 21 - Posted by: gwmcclintok, 1/2/2013 8:22:29 AM     (No. 9094318)

1. There´s a provision extending a tax policy related to Puerto Rican rum.
2.And a tax credit for 2- and 3-wheel electric vehicles. 70 million
4. An extension of some special rules for the film and television business. 430 million.
5. A gift to the car-racing world. 70 million
6. Help to asparagus farmers.
7.$59 million for algae growers
8.Another provision dealt with nuclear weapons. It will alter a law setting conditions under which the president could reduce the U.S. nuclear arsenal. Giving Obama more power.
9.One provision renews an Agriculture Department price-support program through which the government buys cheese and butter from dairy farmers.

Thank you Republicans. What happened to that lying contract you boasted of in 2010? Yeah I bet you did vote for it Paul Ryan. Protecting your cheese crowd.




Reply 22 - Posted by: knarfski, 1/2/2013 8:40:11 AM     (No. 9094344)

Too many in DC/Congress are in the dark with respect to the actual social contingencies operating in society. They are captives to "what´s on paper" and all the attendant weaknesses.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: 49 Ford, 1/2/2013 8:45:35 AM     (No. 9094357)

#16, that´s not a realistic scenario. The Republicans would have been blamed for the tax increases ("In their zeal to protect the rich they were willing to raise your taxes!") and the MSM stoked and fueled "hardships" caused by sequestration (remember the ´95 government shutdown)?


Reply 24 - Posted by: BarryNo, 1/2/2013 8:51:39 AM     (No. 9094368)

Sorry but you´re all a bunch of idiots.

This plan is worse than the public showing of Plan ´B´, but probably not any worse than what Plan ´B´ would have been once implemented. Remember what Boehner did with the last Debt Ceiling deal?

The Washington Reality is that Washington Elites do what they want to, to acquire power. This is merely rubbing our faces and our Conservative member´s faces in that reality. The way out of this mess is NOT to punish those who stood on principle, or reward those who have slapped us in the face.

Our founders risked everything to give us freedom. Most ended up dying in the gutters, betrayed by people like these Washington Elites (who, by the way also enshrined slavery in America in those early years). If we want liberty we may have to fight for it - and I´m not talking about ´political maneuvering´. If they won´t stop spending, then we have to discover ways of starving the beast. We also must understand that IF we successfully starve this government monster, we must be prepared to defend ourselves when they come after us. They will come after us with Media, and with guns. They will kill us, if we successfully pose a threat to their plans and power.

This is the beginning of the end of America, or the the beginning of a a renewed America.

It is our choice. And I don´t plan on swallowing anything.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Catherine, 1/2/2013 9:02:13 AM     (No. 9094396)

# 2 makes the best sense I´ve read here in ages.

My friend keeps blaming Republicans for the mess we´re in. She doesn´t seem to understand Republicans have been powerless since 2008. If they all left, it would make it very clean who the bad guys really are.


Reply 26 - Posted by: get er done, 1/2/2013 9:25:10 AM     (No. 9094457)

Tea Party and other conservative Republicans should refuse to ratify the Electoral College vote and should instead elect a Constitutionally qualified president of their choice. Give Dems and 0 a "bitter pill" to swallow.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/2/2013 9:29:22 AM     (No. 9094469)

I was shocked by Obama´s speech bragging about increasing taxes on the wealthy! He was acting like Rocky after the big fight.
WHAT kind of President does that?
I suggest all wealthy leave the USA, as it appears this government does not make them welcome here, but rather targets them for shame and punishment.
Take your businesses and wealth to some place where you will get the thanks and respect you deserve for your hard work.
America will be like Greece in less than 10 years.


Reply 28 - Posted by: JAN, 1/2/2013 9:31:39 AM     (No. 9094475)

Most of the peope here on Lucianne.com don´t want to acknowledge that the dems have been in charge since 2006.

Blaming republicans for all the world´s ills.

They had a chance to get out and vote. Now they are whining about the results.

Thanks for nothing purists.


Reply 29 - Posted by: lifelonghuman, 1/2/2013 9:52:15 AM     (No. 9094516)

Sadly, they needed to get this "out of the way". The real test comes in two months.

Plus, I like cheese.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Refried, 1/2/2013 10:06:09 AM     (No. 9094542)

Dittos to poster #7 !


Reply 31 - Posted by: Cleanhousein2012, 1/2/2013 10:27:47 AM     (No. 9094566)

28 - many of us did get out and vote, not too mention worked our tails off to get a lousy candidate elected as President. It is not too much for us to expect our elected misrepresentatives to vote against bad policy and have our backs. The Republican-led Congress voted to increase taxes and increase spending in a bill they didn´t have time to read.

The repubs are toast. They wil lose the House in 2014 because if they are going to vote like Democrats, we might as well vote for a Democrat. I know my local RINO Congressman will never again receive my vote.




Reply 32 - Posted by: ilovedogs, 1/2/2013 10:37:54 AM     (No. 9094593)

I refuse to trash Romney for losing. We all knew it was going to be an uphill battle no matter who won the primary. Was he my first choice, no. But he handled the whole thing as well as could be expected. I want the people on "our" side who didn´t vote for him to justify their actions. Surely they knew too this too would happen. Hunker down, this too will pass.


Reply 33 - Posted by: RancherJack, 1/2/2013 11:07:31 AM     (No. 9094666)

Time to water the Tree of Liberty


Reply 34 - Posted by: chicodon, 1/2/2013 11:22:06 AM     (No. 9094704)

I hope the Republicans can hang this albatross around the Democrats´ necks. If I were them this would be the LAST deal, of any kind, until 2014. Use the power of the purse.


Reply 35 - Posted by: maryc, 1/2/2013 11:56:48 AM     (No. 9094779)

UAA Bankruptcy dollar by printed dollar. The depression will look mild by comparrison. What will happen when the free phones are turned off and the free cheese has been eaten by the Rats in Congress and the White House ?


Reply 36 - Posted by: maryc, 1/2/2013 11:58:10 AM     (No. 9094782)

sorry meant to say USA


Reply 37 - Posted by: navybrat, 1/2/2013 12:29:01 PM     (No. 9094837)

All of the Georgia House members voted No. The 2 RINO senators voted for it. I want to work to get Saxby Chambliss primaried so that he can be voted out in the upcoming election. Then on to get Isakson voted out.

I have wanted to re-register as an Independent for a long time. The problem is that if I did, I would not be able to vote in the Republican primaries.


Reply 38 - Posted by: knowThem, 1/2/2013 12:54:19 PM     (No. 9094881)

third party time seems to me I´ve been saying it for too long, GOP can go off the cliff, they got too fat.


Reply 39 - Posted by: rocket scientist, 1/2/2013 1:19:40 PM     (No. 9094928)

Tax paying Americans just got our noses rubbed in the same old crap again. We still don´t have a budget, taxes just got higher and spending just got higher and nothing was done to reduce the deficit. And we´re all supposed to be relieved because we avoided this phony fiscal cliff? This deal was all about putting a stake in the Republican Party and kicking the can down the road again. We got nothing from Boehner and his boys yet again. How much longer are Americans going to put up with this fake dog and pony show from our corrupt government? We citizens are trapped with a criminal government and a corrupt media. Michael Savage said it well recently - "When we lost the media we lost the country".


Reply 40 - Posted by: distorted, 1/2/2013 1:40:38 PM     (No. 9094956)

It had to have been the gov´t payments for
cheese that did it.


No, it was the continuing billion$ to the windmill kleptocracy.


Reply 41 - Posted by: MickinPhoenix, 1/2/2013 1:46:27 PM     (No. 9094965)

A third party is not the way to go. A united Dem Party will ALWAYS DEFEAT a devided second and third party.


Reply 42 - Posted by: JediJerry, 1/2/2013 1:50:59 PM     (No. 9094976)

Now I understand why Photoonist bailed.
People can only work so hard then the bottom falls out and it´s time to hang up the six guns. I can´t take it anymore either. We are so doomed. Hey Photoonist... wait up brother, i am right behind you. Anybody else feelin it?


Reply 43 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 1/2/2013 2:39:36 PM     (No. 9095049)

The Republican party is a sham. It provides the illusion of choice and serves as the scapegoat for Democrats. Republicanism = socialism + militarism. Boehner´s goal was to protect our bloated military budget. The GOP has never reduced federal spending, has never eliminated a single socialist program. The history of the GOP is an almost uninterrupted series of retreat and surrenders. Unlike the Democrats, the GOP has never resolved the inner conflict between the Teddy Roosevelt/Nelson Rockefeller eastern big government progressives, and the western advocates of smaller government, who stay with the GOP, but almost always lose.


Reply 44 - Posted by: 3XALADY, 1/2/2013 3:00:44 PM     (No. 9095078)

Amen#44. I´ve about had it with caring about what happens politically and I´ve about had it with the talkers every day. Full up to here with their nothingness. We have a president tearing this country down who is most probably not even eligible to be president and no one except for a very few have the gonads to take a look. And the ones who do care enough to find out the truth and chewed up, spit out and forgotten about. Not one time during the last election did I hear the ineligibility of Zippy being mentioned. Enough is enough, and I´ve about had enough.


Reply 45 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 1/2/2013 8:17:58 PM     (No. 9095580)

Here we go again. It´s not just the pubs, folks. Both parties and the elected independents certainly bear their share of the failures.

As you have read right here on L.com, don´t fall for the progressive trick of divide and conquer. By wishing the pub party to go away is exactly what the left wants to have happen because it guarantees them perpetual control over who we are, what we think, and when we will think it. By the time any new third party becomes powerful enough, it will be to little too late. Better to improve the republican party to defeat the left including the msm, once and for all.


Reply 46 - Posted by: federale, 1/3/2013 10:22:46 AM     (No. 9096367)

The Ongoing Disgrace That Is Obamanomics

President Obama has led America into an accelerating downward spiral. Destination: Argentina. Last Friday’s calamitous jobs report was just a signpost on the way.

Argentina enjoyed the world’s fourth highest per capita GDP in 1929, on par with the U.S. at the time. But then the nation lost its way through its embrace of a leftist, union allied government, which took control of the economy and imposed wildly irresponsible taxes, spending, deficits and debt. After World War II, the hugely popular Juan Peron came to power and institutionalized the madness. It has been all downhill for Argentina ever since. Sound familiar?
Today, Argentina ranks 53rd in the world in per capita GDP according to the International Monetary Fund, 57th in the CIA World Factbook, at a level less than one third that of the U.S. But its national debt at 51% of GDP is actually less than that of the United States under the Obama Administration, where we are rocketing towards 70% of GDP by the end of this year, and 200% in 25 years, according to CBO.



Post Reply   Close thread 717365




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Maryland girl is armed with
arguments against gun control
Washington Times, by David Sherfinski    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:26:36 PM     Post Reply
A three-minute video of Sarah Merkle’s testimony about Maryland’s new gun legislation has drawn more than 2 million views on YouTube, won her praise from gun rights advocates across the country and even scored her an interview on national television last week. But the 15-year-old from Baltimore said she cares more about her message. “The biggest part of this is that the pro-gun, Second Amendment argument is getting publicity,” she said. “I like that it actually got out there, and not just because it’s me, but because it’s the argument.”

Filibuster gains support to
delay gun control vote
Washington Times, by David Sherfinski    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:25:18 PM     Post Reply
A growing number of senators are trying to quash gun legislation before it even hits the chamber floor as Democrats hold out hope for a compromise and the White House gears up for a weeklong offensive to pressure Congress to act. Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, said as many as 13 senators now publicly support a filibuster on the motion to proceed on pending gun legislation, which effectively would block debate on the bill. “When you’re in a snake pit, you kill a snake any time and chance that you get,”

White House looks to salvage
gun-control legislation
Washington Times, by Tim Devaney    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:22:42 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration took to the airwaves Sunday morning to call on Republicans to back the president’s plan for gun control. In interviews on “Fox News Sunday” and ABC’s “This Week,”Dan Pfeiffer, a senior White House adviser, pointed out that 90 percent of Americans support President Obama’s plan to expand background checks on citizens who purchase guns, and he pressured Republicans to get on board with what he said where “common-sense measures.” “You can’t get 90 percent of Americans to agree on the weather,” Mr. Pfeiffer said on “Fox News Sunday.” Mr. Pfeiffer warned that a potential Republican filibuster

Bipartisan unity on North Korea:
Republicans praise Obama’s
handling of threat
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:20:32 PM     Post Reply
President Obama won rare foreign policy praise from Republicans for his administration’s handling of the North Korea crisis, as China signaled a possible readiness to play a more active role in pressuring Pyongyang away from provoking a military conflict. Two influential Republicans commended the White House on separate news talk shows Sunday for striking an effective balance by allowing senior Cabinet members to issue cautionary remarks in response to North Korea, while also strategically adjusting the U.S. military posture in the region. “This administration’s acted responsibly,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham

Senate has become more
partisan, less collegial —
more like the House
Washington Post, by Chris Cillizza    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:17:33 PM     Post Reply
The world’s greatest deliberative body has started to look a lot like its legislative little brother over the past few years. The Senate was once regarded as the home of the great political orators of the time — not to mention the body where true dealmaking actually took place. Its members prided themselves on their cool approach to legislating, in contrast with the more brawling nature of the House. Senators, generally, liked one another — no matter their party — and weren’t afraid to show it, either personally or politically. No longer. The Senate has undergone a marked transformation

Gun legislation’s prospects improve
Washington Post, by Ed O´Keefe and Philip Rucker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:14:37 PM     Post Reply
Prospects for a bipartisan deal to expand federal background checks for gun purchases are improving with the emergence of fresh Republican support, according to top Senate aides. The possibility that after weeks of stalled negotiations senators might be on the cusp of a breakthrough comes as President Obama and his top surrogates will begin on Monday their most aggressive push yet to rally Americans around his gun-control agenda. Even though polls show that a universal background-check system is supported by nine in 10 Americans, the president has been unable to translate popular support

An act of political malpractice
Washington Post, by Ruth Marcus    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:12:28 PM     Post Reply
On the matter of the president and Kamala Harris, I could go either way. I could write a column — call it Classic Feminist High Dudgeon — lamenting the president’s comments about the California attorney general’s good looks. This column would discuss the continuing, albeit more subtle, discrimination against women in the workplace. It would explain how, even if unintentionally, Obama’s reference to Harris’s attractiveness is demeaning — that it serves, in the apologetic words of White House press secretary Jay Carney, “to diminish the attorney general’s professional accomplishments and her capabilities.” It would, inevitably, invoke the president’s daughters

Democrats push problem
solvers in House contests
Washington Post, by Paul Kane    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:38:26 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Party officials believe that Kevin Strouse is exactly the kind of candidate who can help them retake the House next year. He’s a smart, young former Army Ranger — good qualities for any aspiring politician. But what party leaders really like is that Strouse doesn’t have particularly strong views on the country’s hottest issues. Immigration? Tax policy? “Certainly I have a lot of research to do,” Strouse acknowledged in an interview Thursday as he announced his candidacy in a suburban Philadelphia House district. Strouse’s candidacy reflects an emerging

Texas prosecutors’ slayings
unnerve rural Kaufman County
Washington Post, by Stephanie McCrummen    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:33:08 PM     Post Reply
KAUFMAN, Tex. — The judge was on the phone. “Yep, I said I’ll do anything,” Bruce Wood told the person on the other end, rubbing his forehead. “They asked me to do a eulogy. I don’t know what I’m going to say.” Elsewhere in the Kaufman County Courthouse, a sheriff’s deputy was handing out bulletproof vests. “I brought the smallest one,” he said to a secretary, who stared at the khaki armor as he explained how to adjust the side straps should the need arise. “These have the neck for a female.” Outside, two armed guards

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

A Reporter Explains Why
Gun Coverage Is So Biased
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:13:14 PM     Post Reply
Well, not intentionally. But Jim Ragsdale of the Minneapolis Star Tribune attended a conference in Chicago on covering gun issues, which he describes this way: “Covering Guns” brought reporters with front-line experience covering mass shootings in Tucson, Ariz.; Aurora, Colo.; Newtown, Conn., and Red Lake, Minn., to meet with gun experts and advocates and gun trainers. Sponsored by the Poynter journalism center and funded by the McCormick Foundation of Chicago, we gathered in a city that witnessed 506 homicides last year. The idea, I take it

Report: Carbon Emissions
in US Lowest Since 1994
PJ Media, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:03:02 PM     Post Reply
Carbon emissions in the US were at their lowest level in 2012 since 1994, according to figures released by the US Energy Information Administration. We did it without carbon trading scams, the EPA making carbon dioxide a poison, or obeying the dictates of the Kyoto climate Treaty. We did it partly because of decreased economic activity as a result of the Obama recovery-that-isn’t, but mostly because of good old fashioned market forces; competition between natural gas and coal: Energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2012 were the lowest in the United States since 1994



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
73 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

65 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

65 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Christians, here´s why we´re
losing our religion

48 replie(s)
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM     Post Reply
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”

Broadcasters worry
about ´Zero TV´ homes

47 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM     Post Reply
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

44 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

42 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

The Secrets of Princeton
40 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Is going gluten-free
healthier for everybody?

33 replie(s)
The Week, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/7/2013 11:28:27 AM     Post Reply
Gluten-free diets are all the rage, but they can be dangerous if not done right. What is gluten? It´s the spongy complex of proteins, found naturally in wheat, rye, and barley, that gives elasticity to dough and allows it to rise. When flour is moistened and either kneaded or mixed into dough, gluten molecules form an elastic, microscopic latticework that traps the carbon dioxide produced when yeast ferments, causing dough to inflate like a hot air balloon. Baking hardens the gluten, which helps the finished product keep its shape. Wheat — and gluten — is ubiquitous in the American diet.


Post Reply   Close thread 717365





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS