A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Fiscal Cliff Deal: $1 In Spending Cuts
For Every $41 In Tax Increases

Breitbart, by Matthew Boyle

Original Article

Posted By:WhamDBambam, 1/1/2013 10:40:42 AM

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the last-minute fiscal cliff deal reached by congressional leaders and President Barack Obama cuts only $15 billion in spending while increasing tax revenues by $620 billion—a 41:1 ratio of tax increases to spending cuts. When Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush increased taxes in return for spending cuts—cuts that never ultimately came—they did so at ratios of 3:1 and 2:1.
Headline corrected by staff to remove All Caps. Do not post in All Caps
even if article has them

Comments:
Wow, just a complete cave! Tell me our elected "Republican" representatives all don´t wear panties. Once again, how come no sports team has ever called itself the "Fighting Republicans?"

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Ecclesiastes, 1/1/2013 10:50:58 AM     (No. 9093025)

Are you kidding me? No?

Time to check my Senators and Representative.

I´d rather have the cliff.


Reply 2 - Posted by: rocket-j-squirrel, 1/1/2013 10:53:17 AM     (No. 9093029)

If I had any money worth government confiscation, this would really chap my cheese.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: rational, 1/1/2013 10:56:19 AM     (No. 9093038)

#1
I disagree....
The time to "check" your comgresspeople are during elections when they should be held accountable for action, inaction or just plain old treason. We´re stuck with these animals now for at least the next 2 years, but I fear much longer unless a new third party rises.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Boneshaker, 1/1/2013 11:16:16 AM     (No. 9093076)

Alternate title:

"Republican Prostitutes Give Obama Another Freebie"
.


Reply 5 - Posted by: 6079 Smith, W, 1/1/2013 11:26:03 AM     (No. 9093093)

There is no way that revenue will increase by $620 billion. The economy will continue to stagnate at best and more likely go into depression, so the predicted revenue will not materialize (it never does), so since spending will continue, the debt will deepen and our future generations will not thank us-- nor should they.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Ecclesiastes, 1/1/2013 11:26:18 AM     (No. 9093094)

#3 - There was a chance that my Senator, Wicker, might have voted against it. I had to check.

Now for my Rep, Palazzo. My last Rep, Taylor (D), would have voted against it without a blink. He voted to impeach the Horned One after all.


Reply 7 - Posted by: DCGIRL, 1/1/2013 11:26:46 AM     (No. 9093096)

Mitch McConnell NEEDS TO GO. Where´s the Kentucky Tea Party. Find someone that can replace this total disappointment. He can not communicate with the public, he sold out the republican party and he´s from the old era (tax and spend). Be sure that you vote someone in that can beat one of the washed up Judds. I hear she may be running. Just get rid of Mitch, he´s up for re-election in 2014.

By the way, Sen Pat Toomey is a total disappointment for voting for this trash. We in Pennsylvania need to start looking for someone to take his place. Toomey is up for re-election in 2016.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: MisterDickens, 1/1/2013 11:31:05 AM     (No. 9093101)

The Republican party is the party of steers.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Keekng, 1/1/2013 11:31:47 AM     (No. 9093103)

89 Senators need to be sent packing. Hopefully the Tea Party will run a strong candidate against Lindsey Graham in the next election.


Reply 10 - Posted by: uno, 1/1/2013 11:34:13 AM     (No. 9093107)

So we all know that when you give this government money, they will find a way to burn it and then some. What this amounts to is; for every foot the life ring is thrown out, the drowning victim drifts 41 feet further out to sea.


Reply 11 - Posted by: hamrman, 1/1/2013 12:15:50 PM     (No. 9093167)

This is no deal, it is another trick...let us wake up and see what these rabble rousers are doing to our country (WIC=Whatever Is Convenient) for them, not for we the PEOPLE!


Reply 12 - Posted by: bogeegolf, 1/1/2013 12:21:29 PM     (No. 9093186)

What a stupid picture of Boner.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 1/1/2013 12:26:23 PM     (No. 9093194)

The Pubbies continue their unbroken string - - of voting for tax increases to finance an ever-growing welfare state.

And some of us were foolish enough to believe that the era of big government was over. God bless the Pubbies - - thanks to them the welfare state will live forever!


Reply 14 - Posted by: reilly, 1/1/2013 12:28:50 PM     (No. 9093199)


Saps 89, Profiles in Courage 8. (This Senate is completely silly, and there´s a patsy in the White House. The house should trump and make them squirm. The numbers are indefensible.)


Reply 15 - Posted by: Grambo, 1/1/2013 12:37:24 PM     (No. 9093221)

8 patriots and 89 weenies. Take names and take notes.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Really?, 1/1/2013 12:47:51 PM     (No. 9093244)

I guess this is what Obama calls "a balanced approach" ?

Sucker punched again by Tax and Spend Democrats.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Spidey, 1/1/2013 3:28:33 PM     (No. 9093422)

The lack of single family homebuilding could be the biggest reason the economy isn´t recovering. Builders can´t get the loans to start projects. On top of that,there´s government demands that certain number of new home developments must include low income housing which would kill sales of the other homes.

Obama is also dead set against rural sprawl because it gives decent people an escape hatch from crime areas and lousy schools. He´s also trying to create a false housing shortage to bring home values back up.Filling houses with recycled sub prime type borrowers sets the government up to eat more losses,thus we´re seeing hints about the FHA needing a bailout and does nothing to increase home values. In fact airdropping urban subprimers into decent neighborhoods kills values going up.

They´re also starting to charge homebuilders with eco-impact fees and sprinkler systems which add to the cost of the house that somebody has to eat.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Ivehadit, 1/1/2013 4:12:10 PM     (No. 9093472)

I HAVE HAD IT with just about everyone in DC. They are spending us into total destruction ON OUR BACKS. And running off the successful. STOP it NOW!

If BUSH´S policies were so bad WHY DO THEY WANT TO KEEP HIS TAX CUTS?? For the record his economy was fantastic. Frank and Dodd and b. Clinton´s policies are what mostly hurt us, IMHO and as I read her book, in the opinion of Gretchen Morgensen, NEW YORK TIMES financial reporter.



Post Reply   Close thread 717321




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "WhamDBambam"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "WhamDBambam"



Fiscal Cliff Deal: $1 In Spending Cuts
For Every $41 In Tax Increases
Breitbart, by Matthew Boyle    Original Article
Posted By: WhamDBambam- 1/1/2013 10:40:42 AM     Post Reply
According to the Congressional Budget Office, the last-minute fiscal cliff deal reached by congressional leaders and President Barack Obama cuts only $15 billion in spending while increasing tax revenues by $620 billion—a 41:1 ratio of tax increases to spending cuts. When Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush increased taxes in return for spending cuts—cuts that never ultimately came—they did so at ratios of 3:1 and 2:1.
Headline corrected by staff to remove All Caps. Do not post in All Caps
even if article has them

How Mitt Romney can
redeem himself in 2013
Newsday, by MARGARET CARLSON    Original Article
Posted By: WhamDBambam- 12/29/2012 7:10:21 AM     Post Reply
As I look back at the 2012 presidential campaign, it now all seems so obvious.Not one of those clowns performing at the hundreds of Republican primary debates this year and last was a match for the eventual nominee, Mitt Romney. And Romney clearly wasn't the candidate to defeat President Barack Obama.Yes and yes - but still. We don't always see what's happening before our very eyes. To me, the last 12 months (give or take a few) raise two central questions: If we don't learn from the flawed candidates of the past, how will we avoid taking them seriously in the future?
Staff added more text, removed byline from headline.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
73 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

   

 



 
´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

65 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

65 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Christians, here´s why we´re
losing our religion

48 replie(s)
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM     Post Reply
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”

Broadcasters worry
about ´Zero TV´ homes

47 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM     Post Reply
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

44 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

42 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

The Secrets of Princeton
40 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for

   

Post Reply   Close thread 717321





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS