 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
ObamaCare, 2013, and the Start of the GOP Comeback
Commentary Magazine, by Peter Wehner
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 12/31/2012 11:09:11 PM
|
| Right now the political landscape is grim for Republicans–and in the short term, thanks to the so-called fiscal cliff, things may get grimmer still. But moments like these can pass, often quicker than we think. And next year may turn out to be one in which the pernicious effects of the Affordable Care Act–aka ObamaCare–really begin to kick in, from higher premiums to the loss of employer-based health insurance to the start of enrollment in insurance exchanges. It will become more and more clear to the public what a nightmarish law
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
janylou, 12/31/2012 11:31:54 PM (No. 9092496)
I hope Peter is right and 2014 will far surpass 2012 as far as winning seats!
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 12/31/2012 11:43:40 PM (No. 9092511)
What good is a comeback, if they don´t change ?
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Cleanhousein2012, 1/1/2013 1:10:34 AM (No. 9092570)
In order for there to be a comeback, the GOP will need to win back the many of us that they dissed over the course of the 2010 and 2012 elections.
As far as I personally am concerned, barring some miraculous change I cannot see supporting anyone from either the Repub or the Dem party in the future.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
LanieLou, 1/1/2013 1:55:35 AM (No. 9092593)
Love the optimism but the fact is, this whole fiscal cliff crisis was invented by the progressive marxists to blame the costs of ObamaCare on the GOP.
That is why he hit the campaign trail over the fiscal cliff... to make sure the low informed know to blame the GOP if any of their COL goes up.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Cat Ballou, 1/1/2013 3:20:27 AM (No. 9092621)
A comeback would depend on the amount of voter fraud that takes place. My guess would be quite a lot of fraud will occur, because it worked so well in 2012.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Spidey, 1/1/2013 6:11:39 AM (No. 9092673)
The destructive nature of Obamacare is a poor option to pin your hopes on as far as a backlash orcomeback.At least half the country knew it would be devastating back when it first passed.Don´t think for a minute that the authors of this bill did everything they could to protect Obama´s voters from feeling the pain of it.
At some point when you come up for treatment,they´ll have some sort of profile on you to determine whether you"deserve" treatment or not. For every older person that croaks early,it´ll be more money for people like broodmares and illegal aliens to keep voters coming.
At some point,you´re going to have to supply proof of insurance when you file your taxes. If you don´t have proof,the fine will come out of your refund,if you have one coming.It´s possible people will be shocked and mad when this happens and it´ll lead to people not filing returns at all.
It going to lead to a lot more people working under the able,working 30hour weeks and employers using temp services.All this will kill the general revenue base and killthe economy,what´s left of it.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 1/1/2013 6:57:20 AM (No. 9092695)
Socialist Democrats, looters and moochers, public service unions, teachers have got real Americans outnumbered. It may be too late to do anything except don´t spend money, keep your families close and hang on. Only some horrific huge catastrophic event could turn this around.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
DCGIRL, 1/1/2013 7:24:35 AM (No. 9092717)
the first thing that needs to happen is fire McConnell in the senate and Beohner in the house. That´s a start. They are both broken and needs to get out of the way.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Gretchen, 1/1/2013 7:40:47 AM (No. 9092732)
Still working off the old paradigm, I see.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
provide, 1/1/2013 7:57:05 AM (No. 9092748)
The number of exceptions for Obamacare will grow as groups see it implemented. Like no birth control provision for Muslims.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
EnsignO´Toole, 1/1/2013 8:30:23 AM (No. 9092792)
#5 is right. Until accuracy of the vote is achieved and guaranteed, we are no better than a third-world dictatorship.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 1/1/2013 8:49:59 AM (No. 9092819)
#6 is exactly right. And his summary and conclusions are exactly what Obama and his progressive left had planned. It´s all going according to The Plan.
And #9 is also clued in. That ´fundamental transformation´ Obama promised in 2008? It has ALREADY HAPPENED. We need to think like they think in order to combat their plans, without giving up our own souls.
Tough task. Can we do it with what remains of us?
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
cobieone, 1/1/2013 8:51:55 AM (No. 9092825)
#4 is correct and it looks like it worked on Posters #2 and #3. Most of this spending damage was done in Zero´s first two years when he had a Democrat Congress. The Republicans were elected in 2010 to stop this spending craze and did a pretty good job. What did we conservatives do in 2012... we stayed home and lost the momentum big time. Now we will pay and the Democrats (and the media) will successfully blame it all on the Republicans. In 2014, many more conservatives will fall for the "blame the Republicans" nonsense and we will lose even more seats. Extremely hard for me to be optimistic after what happened in November.
I also agree with #11... election fraud is a huge issue.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Grambo, 1/1/2013 9:09:54 AM (No. 9092844)
Obamacare is Social Security’s last best hope for survival. When SS was launched, precious few people lived long after retirement at age 65, which meant the plan didn’t have to support too many for too long. With our greater longevity now, the math works against SS. Enter the Obamacare death panels. Bingo, the SS longevity problem goes away. Brilliant.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Starlady, 1/1/2013 9:24:51 AM (No. 9092870)
Since the election of 2012 when I read thread after thread here on various topics I see Alinsky has won. One of his tenets calls for discouraging the opponent. Well, we all sound very discouraged. I feel we must fight against this emotion, not give in to it. We have become very negative (myself included), in our thinking. Last night I was remembering a more hopeful time for posters here just a year ago. Can you remember our hope, our expectations as the New Year 2012 came into being? We were excited at the opportunities ahead. A few days after the election I decided that my family needed to focus on things closer to home if we were going to survive the next four years. We will celebrate the good things in our personal lives, like weddings and graduations and new births and relationships with friends. We will look to these for happiness, not the government or Washington DC. Although I have no good thoughts about the man who occupies the WH, I will not allow him or his family to influence my level of happiness. He will not make me discouraged, he will not win. That is Resolution #1 for me through 2016.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
balogreene, 1/1/2013 10:16:22 AM (No. 9092960)
Thank you #15. We have to get involved in local politics, and turn things around. Other than that, we have to be happy at home and work, and with our families. Something I heard a long time ago, I think it´s from St. Paul, "Be content in all things". It´s not always easy, but remember there are things you can´t change, stop fighting emotion and be content. With your family, your little world, be content.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Bpl40, 1/1/2013 10:23:16 AM (No. 9092975)
They will do well in´14 but blow it in 16.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Muguy, 1/1/2013 10:24:04 AM (No. 9092977)
I´d love to believe that we will see a change-- but the unwanted visitors are not at the front door--they´ve already taken over the parlor, raided and plundered the kitchen and are heading for the bedroom!
Making up law to one´s whim, disregarding the laws already on the books, out and out graft and corruption-- these are the very reasons why the Founders crafted the Constitution with checks and balances--because they knew the corrupt nature of man.
Maybe enought [r]epublicans will take over the local politics and then the individual states before the federal Leviathan tramples the rights of the states completely.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
arkfamily, 1/1/2013 10:38:09 AM (No. 9093002)
#15, I really appreciate what you are saying because I basically had arrived to that conclusion in order to swallow what happened in the election. It is getting more difficult.
Thankfully, my husband found a job after he was laid off. First time in his life. He had a small layoff in college but it was insignificant. I am employed after being a stay-at-home mom and it has helped our financial situation. My husband took a substantial cut in pay and our health insurance costs skyrocketed. We no longer have co-pays but have to meet a yearly deductible. There was no other choice. Yes, I am thankful we have insurance but when you have to cough up a substantial amount of money because of an injury, a person realizes the benefits of co-pays.
I think it is discrimination in its purest form when taxation occurs at 400,000 or even 250,000. There is no accountability for the social programs so fraud can occur at any time. Of course, to reform those programs would be offensive to this administration.
I don´t know I am trying to be hopeful but when no accountability takes place in government, it reeks havoc on the taxpayer. Everyone seems to look away. I will say it again - charity comes from the heart and should not be mandated by the government. A cheerful giver? Not so much anymore but I still do. We work hard for our money and I want to know that it isn´t going to be blown on things that are not necessaries.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Butch59, 1/1/2013 10:47:17 AM (No. 9093018)
Once again I will state that the only solution for what ails this once great nation is for enough people get mad enough and rise up and engage in another revolution. Completely throw out everyone in D.C. Re-write the constitution to strengthen it where there are weaknesses. Have term limits for one. Have Senators elected by their respective state legislatures, like the founders originally intended, etc. These are just to few, but more are there. Just don´t deviate from the original intent. That´s the key.
I would join up in a heart beat if this could happen. And I´m 67yrs old.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Boneshaker, 1/1/2013 11:23:09 AM (No. 9093089)
Its not a comeback.
At best it is a Dead Cat Bounce. .
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Republic Can, 1/1/2013 12:17:35 PM (No. 9093171)
We wouldn´t have to wring our panties and second-guess eachother today if we had secured the vote in November. There are things you can do to help. Investigate.
Our ENTIRE system is predicated on one-man-one-vote and all that that concept entails. We ARE the majority, and a bulletproof voting booth would have proven that. The devil´s greatest accomplishment is making us believe he doesn´t exist. Now he´s got us counting angels on a pin-head instead of realizing that this year, he thrived inside our sacred voting machines as well as in the parasitic electorate.
We can´t ´keep the Republic´ without all the parts. The vote is Part Number One.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
bhkat, 1/1/2013 1:01:06 PM (No. 9093271)
Given that typical Odumbo voters are stupid, they will believe the dums when they blame republicans for whatever problems they have due to obamacare.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
dodge boy, 1/1/2013 3:37:17 PM (No. 9093435)
Destroy obie, the msm and the entertainment industry, then we can talk about a comeback.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
4Justice, 1/1/2013 3:43:25 PM (No. 9093439)
#24, you keep saying the NRA passed Obamacare...where do you get your information??? Please cite sources. I can see no relation between the two.
Thanks #15 & 22. I still think that one of our biggest problem is that we are not active enough in demanding that our reps adhere to the Constitution and that they hold this administration accountable. We need to be vocal. We need to bombard them with our voices and writing. It is too easy to sit back and point fingers or expect (hope) others will fix things. It is our job--nobody else´s. The left knew it and have been infiltrating every corner they can for years. But we still really are the majority. We are the silent majority though, and they will keep winning until we all take action and stop waiting to be saved. If we don´t, they will eventually become the majority and then we will have lost it all.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
guybee, 1/1/2013 6:11:18 PM (No. 9093604)
When O goes out on the trail and promotes his agenda - he is talking to himself. Those who voted for him will vote for anything he proposes. When Rahm or Michelle run in 2016, the useless idiots will fall in line and vote for them.
Approximately 75,000,000 voters did NOT vote in the 2012 election. Romney lost by 377,000 votes. Seems like the GOP needs to do a better job of getting the vote out to turn this around.
2014 is not that far away. We need to hang on til then and win back the Senate and grow the House majority.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
philemon1967, 1/1/2013 8:44:54 PM (No. 9093761)
Obama and the Democratic Party are not the first corrupt oligarchy in the world, and the fact that they use underhanded tactics like fear-mongering and voter fraud to win, rather than well-reasoned arguments, does not mean that it is impossible for the US to rid them of this corrupt bunch of Chicagocrats (apologies to Chicago denizens).
Many corrupt one-party regimens have fallen when people finally looked beyond the lies and developed non-mainstream ways of communication to finally effect the "preference cascade" that sweeps these tyrants from their perches. America has not yet reach that point. Even low information voters will be open to thinking when the freebies run out but unfortunately, others will also have to suffer from confiscatory seizures of their hard-earned cash before the country runs out of money to reach that point.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
rsgonner, 1/1/2013 9:06:29 PM (No. 9093792)
Galt´s Gulch....the time has come
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Maryland girl is armed with arguments against gun control
|
|
Washington Times, by David Sherfinski
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:26:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A three-minute video of Sarah Merkle’s testimony about Maryland’s new gun legislation has drawn more than 2 million views on YouTube, won her praise from gun rights advocates across the country and even scored her an interview on national television last week. But the 15-year-old from Baltimore said she cares more about her message. “The biggest part of this is that the pro-gun, Second Amendment argument is getting publicity,” she said. “I like that it actually got out there, and not just because it’s me, but because it’s the argument.”
|
Filibuster gains support to delay gun control vote
|
|
Washington Times, by David Sherfinski
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:25:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A growing number of senators are trying to quash gun legislation before it even hits the chamber floor as Democrats hold out hope for a compromise and the White House gears up for a weeklong offensive to pressure Congress to act. Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, said as many as 13 senators now publicly support a filibuster on the motion to proceed on pending gun legislation, which effectively would block debate on the bill. “When you’re in a snake pit, you kill a snake any time and chance that you get,”
|
White House looks to salvage gun-control legislation
|
|
Washington Times, by Tim Devaney
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:22:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Obama administration took to the airwaves Sunday morning to call on Republicans to back the president’s plan for gun control. In interviews on “Fox News Sunday” and ABC’s “This Week,”Dan Pfeiffer, a senior White House adviser, pointed out that 90 percent of Americans support President Obama’s plan to expand background checks on citizens who purchase guns, and he pressured Republicans to get on board with what he said where “common-sense measures.” “You can’t get 90 percent of Americans to agree on the weather,” Mr. Pfeiffer said on “Fox News Sunday.” Mr. Pfeiffer warned that a potential Republican filibuster
|
Bipartisan unity on North Korea: Republicans praise Obama’s handling of threat
|
|
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:20:32 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama won rare foreign policy praise from Republicans for his administration’s handling of the North Korea crisis, as China signaled a possible readiness to play a more active role in pressuring Pyongyang away from provoking a military conflict. Two influential Republicans commended the White House on separate news talk shows Sunday for striking an effective balance by allowing senior Cabinet members to issue cautionary remarks in response to North Korea, while also strategically adjusting the U.S. military posture in the region. “This administration’s acted responsibly,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham
|
Senate has become more partisan, less collegial — more like the House
|
|
Washington Post, by Chris Cillizza
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:17:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The world’s greatest deliberative body has started to look a lot like its legislative little brother over the past few years. The Senate was once regarded as the home of the great political orators of the time — not to mention the body where true dealmaking actually took place. Its members prided themselves on their cool approach to legislating, in contrast with the more brawling nature of the House. Senators, generally, liked one another — no matter their party — and weren’t afraid to show it, either personally or politically. No longer. The Senate has undergone a marked transformation
|
|
Gun legislation’s prospects improve
|
|
Washington Post, by Ed O´Keefe and Philip Rucker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:14:37 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Prospects for a bipartisan deal to expand federal background checks for gun purchases are improving with the emergence of fresh Republican support, according to top Senate aides. The possibility that after weeks of stalled negotiations senators might be on the cusp of a breakthrough comes as President Obama and his top surrogates will begin on Monday their most aggressive push yet to rally Americans around his gun-control agenda. Even though polls show that a universal background-check system is supported by nine in 10 Americans, the president has been unable to translate popular support
|
|
An act of political malpractice
|
|
Washington Post, by Ruth Marcus
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:12:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On the matter of the president and Kamala Harris, I could go either way. I could write a column — call it Classic Feminist High Dudgeon — lamenting the president’s comments about the California attorney general’s good looks. This column would discuss the continuing, albeit more subtle, discrimination against women in the workplace. It would explain how, even if unintentionally, Obama’s reference to Harris’s attractiveness is demeaning — that it serves, in the apologetic words of White House press secretary Jay Carney, “to diminish the attorney general’s professional accomplishments and her capabilities.” It would, inevitably, invoke the president’s daughters
|
Democrats push problem solvers in House contests
|
|
Washington Post, by Paul Kane
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:38:26 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Democratic Party officials believe that Kevin Strouse is exactly the kind of candidate who can help them retake the House next year. He’s a smart, young former Army Ranger — good qualities for any aspiring politician. But what party leaders really like is that Strouse doesn’t have particularly strong views on the country’s hottest issues. Immigration? Tax policy? “Certainly I have a lot of research to do,” Strouse acknowledged in an interview Thursday as he announced his candidacy in a suburban Philadelphia House district. Strouse’s candidacy reflects an emerging
|
Texas prosecutors’ slayings unnerve rural Kaufman County
|
|
Washington Post, by Stephanie McCrummen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:33:08 PM
Post Reply
|
|
KAUFMAN, Tex. — The judge was on the phone. “Yep, I said I’ll do anything,” Bruce Wood told the person on the other end, rubbing his forehead. “They asked me to do a eulogy. I don’t know what I’m going to say.” Elsewhere in the Kaufman County Courthouse, a sheriff’s deputy was handing out bulletproof vests. “I brought the smallest one,” he said to a secretary, who stared at the khaki armor as he explained how to adjust the side straps should the need arise. “These have the neck for a female.” Outside, two armed guards
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
A Reporter Explains Why Gun Coverage Is So Biased
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:13:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Well, not intentionally. But Jim Ragsdale of the Minneapolis Star Tribune attended a conference in Chicago on covering gun issues, which he describes this way: “Covering Guns” brought reporters with front-line experience covering mass shootings in Tucson, Ariz.; Aurora, Colo.; Newtown, Conn., and Red Lake, Minn., to meet with gun experts and advocates and gun trainers. Sponsored by the Poynter journalism center and funded by the McCormick Foundation of Chicago, we gathered in a city that witnessed 506 homicides last year. The idea, I take it
|
Report: Carbon Emissions in US Lowest Since 1994
|
|
PJ Media, by Rick Moran
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:03:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Carbon emissions in the US were at their lowest level in 2012 since 1994, according to figures released by the US Energy Information Administration. We did it without carbon trading scams, the EPA making carbon dioxide a poison, or obeying the dictates of the Kyoto climate Treaty. We did it partly because of decreased economic activity as a result of the Obama recovery-that-isn’t, but mostly because of good old fashioned market forces; competition between natural gas and coal: Energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2012 were the lowest in the United States since 1994
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
McCain: ´I don´t understand´ GOP filibuster on guns
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
Christians, here´s why we´re losing our religion
|
|
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Broadcasters worry about ´Zero TV´ homes
|
|
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
Hillary Clinton Would Not ´Clear the Field´ for 2016
|
|
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|