A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


How the fiscal cliff fight will end,
(unhappily for Republicans)

Washington Examiner, by Byron York

Original Article

Posted By:Oblio, 12/29/2012 10:27:47 AM

The word among some Senate Republicans is that a fiscal cliff deal is likely to be struck by Sunday, or Monday at the latest. (And Monday, being December 31st, is in fact the latest a deal could be struck to avoid January 1 tax increases.) Those Senate Republicans hope the final deal will make permanent current tax levels — Bush tax cut levels — for everyone who makes below $500,000.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: ronbet, 12/29/2012 10:36:18 AM     (No. 9088575)

Actually it´s most likely to end unhappily for America!


Reply 2 - Posted by: VinGoombatz, 12/29/2012 10:36:35 AM     (No. 9088576)

The Republicans should state the size of the budget deficit then say FY to Barry.

But...no balls.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Cleanhousein2012, 12/29/2012 10:37:10 AM     (No. 9088578)

One more reason we need a third party.


Reply 4 - Posted by: cartcart, 12/29/2012 10:37:51 AM     (No. 9088581)

My gardener and cleaning lady will be pleased to know that their income from our household is gone as far as they are concerned. I would rather pay them for their services than the government for what little we get by way of services.


Reply 5 - Posted by: jdh, 12/29/2012 10:43:11 AM     (No. 9088587)

Those who voted for Obama may think they won the election, but overall we all lost. The voters, their children, their grandchildren and their grandchildren´s children all lost. After that generation, there won´t be much left to lose or to tax. All of the ´rich´ people will be either dead or in other countries with better tax laws...


Reply 6 - Posted by: DaddyO, 12/29/2012 10:46:21 AM     (No. 9088590)

Actually, if the deal is to make the bush tax rates permanent and nothing else, that would be okay with me. Cut a deal to raise the debt ceiling in exchange for spending reductions in january.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Barkingkangaroo, 12/29/2012 10:50:07 AM     (No. 9088593)

The Repubs could pass a bill to keep everything the same rate and have The One veto it. Someone appears not to be trying.

Why would Barry want to avoid the "Cliff" anyway? Tax rates will just be the same as when Clinton was boss. Dems like more taxes. Why would they not like more taxes from everybody, not just the "Rich"?

This President gets away with a big tax increase (positive) and blames it on the Repubs (another positive).

The only ones who don´t win is us.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: TheMom, 12/29/2012 10:52:16 AM     (No. 9088598)

No deals! No new taxes, cut spending now, not in maybe 10 years. But that would make too much sense...


Reply 9 - Posted by: bluehouse, 12/29/2012 10:53:12 AM     (No. 9088599)

If the Bush era tax cuts are made permanent for 99% of taxpayers, then the Republicans won´t have to fight over them again. That would take a huge bargaining chip away from the Democrats.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Bpl40, 12/29/2012 11:06:18 AM     (No. 9088611)

The government takes in $2.2 trillion and spends $3.8 trillion. There is no other question in the public domain that even comes close to that in gravity and urgency. This debate over tax rates for $250k or $500k or $385.457k is a fool´s errand. If the Republicans agree to it the ´Rats and the MSM will simply invent something else to blame them with. But the Stupid Party will probably walk right into it.


Reply 11 - Posted by: noproblems, 12/29/2012 11:08:33 AM     (No. 9088613)

as long as the spending cuts are maintained, then 0bama and the Dimms can own the tax increases.

Elections do have consequences. Maybe next time the Repugs will run someone outside of the establishment.

the real battle is over the debt limit increase.



Reply 12 - Posted by: Twinkle93, 12/29/2012 11:24:45 AM     (No. 9088640)

It is the spending, stupid!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: mikeman, 12/29/2012 11:35:23 AM     (No. 9088662)

The democrats (obama), and to a large part the republicans have become irrelevant. They both exist to increase the federal bureaucracy and to promote job killing regulations.

Our entire system of govt. exists to confiscate private income and distribute to unions, federal employees, and welfare deadbeats( domestic and imported ).




Reply 14 - Posted by: MisterDickens, 12/29/2012 11:45:46 AM     (No. 9088676)

Republicans in Congress need more money to spend, too. Votes are not free, you know. I don´t think any elected Republican will be unhappy, except in public statements, if taxes go up.

After all, the House could stop Zerocare by not funding it but they haven´t taken any steps in that direction that I am aware of.

Pubs like increased revenue just like Dims.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 12/29/2012 11:55:40 AM     (No. 9088698)

The Democrats said to the Republicans, ´´Your side of the canoe is sinking.´´


Reply 16 - Posted by: Country Boy, 12/29/2012 11:56:18 AM     (No. 9088701)

obama´s strength is that he knows how to lie to stupid people. Beyond that, he is not qualified cut the grass at the White House.


Reply 17 - Posted by: reilly, 12/29/2012 12:00:09 PM     (No. 9088704)


Talk about the debt limit, stupid. That´s the lever we control. No spending cuts, no debt limit. Up the uppity´s.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Grambo, 12/29/2012 12:03:04 PM     (No. 9088711)

All together now, there is no such animal as a permanent tax cut. Congress, like a woman, has a right to change its mind. It can change a “permanent” tax rate with the stroke of a pen.

If the Republicans think they’re getting a negotiated concession in the form of a “permanent” tax rate, I have a bridge to sell them.

Sheesh!


Reply 19 - Posted by: Davids918, 12/29/2012 12:11:51 PM     (No. 9088724)

#20, they´re set to expire, so making them a permanent rate is helpful.

Sure they could be raised again, but Democrats know it´s hard to raise income tax rates which is why they attack businesses to generate revenue streams. People then blame the "greedy" business owners and stick it to them again.

Don´t raise the debt limit for much more than $500 billion, and demand that the Obama spending binge be restrained.

Obama wants to push this out over 2 years with the hopes of taking back the House and having full control, again, in his last 2 years so they can REALLY finish the liberal agenda.


Reply 20 - Posted by: retcpo, 12/29/2012 12:25:43 PM     (No. 9088739)

The best thing is to go over the cliff and stay there. This country is in serious jeopardy as the number of those not paying any Federal income tax at all approaches 50%, while we are building a permanent unemployed class with benefits seemingly that are approaching infinity and disability claims are the new, early, early retirement plans.

I really do not want to pay more taxes but I prefer a system that more evenly takes from all of us rather than makes of us a nation of envy rather than aspiration.

While the political rherotic soars nobody seems to notice that fiscal year 2013, which started October 1, 2013 the borrowing makes the excesses of the past few years seem paltry.

For the first time the Social Security system has paid out more than it took in by $47B, putting it in the red. This only happened because Social Security revenues was foolishly cut by more than 20% for the past few years.

The Democrat strategy is to build a permanent voting class that pays absoulutely no taxes whatsoever but can be counted on to reliability vote for greater and greater taxes for those who have to support them. The Republicans, seemingly the inept, stupid party keep falling victim to this strategy.

So one more chance, let the sequestration on cuts go into effect, let the tax rates go up, stop permanent unemployment compensation, restore Social Security revenue and cut more spending or we won´t have to worry about falling off the clift, we will drop of Mt. Everest.


Reply 21 - Posted by: oh-heck, 12/29/2012 12:52:05 PM     (No. 9088775)

The key to plan B was all the stuff below the radar:

It fixed AMT permanently
It ended some Stimulus tax credits PAYED TO the poor
It ended the emergency extension of unemployment benefits
It fixed the inheritance tax
It made the doctor fix permanent

If they are going to cave on taxing the rich, it would be far better to bring up Plan B instead.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Muguy, 12/29/2012 12:53:22 PM     (No. 9088776)

An interesting take by Byron York, who normally has a very worthy opinion.

The truth is, Zippy believes himself to be God of everything, and so this is going to end unhappily for everyone--in the end, WE ALL GET SCREWED OVER.

That of course not being the Obamaphobes who are already on the dole.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: msctex1, 12/29/2012 1:22:00 PM     (No. 9088821)

Enormous spending cuts kick in if we go over "the cliff."

We are thus completely in control, because Obama could no more allow spending cuts than go without food or air.

We will, of course, ignore this completely and cave in to whatever the arrogant SOB wants.


Reply 24 - Posted by: nonsense, 12/29/2012 1:30:05 PM     (No. 9088836)

The plan is to destroy the Republican party and have one party rule, the one party being the communist party. It´s ok though because 56% of Americans approve of the Obama agenda. Crazy, huh?


Reply 25 - Posted by: beancounter, 12/29/2012 1:35:53 PM     (No. 9088849)

A few problems I have with this article:

1. If Boehner had so much support for Plan B why did he pull it off the table?

2. The article doesn´t say what will happen to the Obama tax cuts. The payroll tax cut will probably go away, but what about the refundable tax credits and other goodies?

The Republicans should say that they support PayGo. The president said that he supported PayGo. Therefore, any bill to reduce taxes on the middle class should come with spending cuts to pay for them.


Reply 26 - Posted by: DonQuijote, 12/29/2012 1:36:09 PM     (No. 9088851)

After the cave, I´m leaving the party, and I told the RNC so yesterday when they called to ask for my annual contribution. I´m small fry, so it doesn´t make a difference, but at least I won´t be bothered with those pesky calls any more. Plus, better to be an independent. We don´t really have any sy in who the nominee is anyway, and no one can assume which way your vote will go, thus polling will be off.


Reply 27 - Posted by: marthaville, 12/29/2012 5:37:06 PM     (No. 9089094)

#3 - the third party candidate Ross Perot gave us Bill Clinton for president. That really worked out well, don´t you think?

#23 - you are one of the few that have touched on the real issues behind Obama´s aim. He wants all the provisions proposed in his budget voted down by the Senate 98-0. This is not about raising the top two rates from 33% and 35% to 36% and 39.6%.

It is all those other provisions Obama has included to raise taxes. Don´t forget his plan to raise the capital gains tax to 20% on top of the Obama care 3.8% tax on investment income, increasing the tax rate on qualified dividends from 15% to 39.6% (plus 3.8%). Obama and his handlers know the media is behind them and the American people think he will balance the budget by raising the top rate on couples making over $250,000.

Stupid is as stupid does.



Post Reply   Close thread 717051




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"



The Secrets of Princeton
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Piercing the secrecy of
offshore tax havens
Washington Post, by Scott Higham, Michael Hudson*    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 7:06:15 AM     Post Reply
A New York hedge fund manager allegedly swindles $12 million from a prominent Baltimore family. An Indiana couple is accused of bilking hundreds of customers by charging for free trials of cosmetic products. A financial manager in Texas promises 23-percent returns but absconds with $33.5 million of his investors’ money in a classic Ponzi scheme.All three cases have one thing in common: money that ended up in offshore accounts and trusts set up in tax havens around the world.

Former News Corp President
Chernin bids $500 million for Hulu
Reuters, by Ronald Grover and Jennifer Saba    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:49:03 AM     Post Reply
Former News Corp president Peter Chernin has bid around $500 million for Hulu, the online video streaming service he helped create in 2007, according to two sources with knowledge of Hulu´s sale process. The website, jointly controlled by News Corp and Walt Disney Co, reached out to potential buyers in March after initially contemplating a deal in which one would buy out the other. It is not clear whether that transaction is still being contemplated.

After Pentagon investigations, three
Army generals censured for misconduct
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:08:11 AM     Post Reply
After lengthy investigations, the Pentagon has determined that three Army generals committed misconduct in separate incidents, adding to an unusually long list of senior military commanders who have been censured over the past year.On Friday, defense officials confirmed that Army Maj. Gen. Ralph O. Baker, the commander of a strategic counterterrorism force on the Horn of Africa, was fired March 28 on charges of sexual misconduct. Two officials familiar with the case said Baker was investigated for allegedly groping a female civilian employee after he had been drinking.

Diplomacy downplay: Obama administration
minimizes latest North Korean nuke threat
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor and Shaun Waterman    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 7:02:06 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration appeared eager Thursday to downplay the North Korean military’s latest threat that it has the final authority to carry out “cutting-edge, smaller, lighter and diversified” nuclear strikes on the United States.“This is just the latest in a long line of aggressive statements,” (Snip)the recent tension between Washington and Pyongyang “does not need to get hotter.”The remarks were the first public reaction from the Obama administration since Wednesday’s claim by the North Korean military that the “moment of explosion is approaching fast” with the possibility of war breaking out “today or tomorrow.”

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Charles Murray´s Gay-Marriage Surprise
New Yorker, by Jane Mayer    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/17/2013 5:00:38 PM     Post Reply
Political scientist Charles Murray has never backed away from controversy, but usually his opponents have been liberals. Friday, however, he managed to upset conservatives at the annual conference known as CPAC, where thousands of bewildered Republicans gathered to figure out the way forward after their party’s 2012 electoral defeat. Murray ditched his prepared remarks on “America Coming Apart” in favor of an impromptu admonition to fellow conservatives to accept the legalization of both gay marriage and abortion.

With a Speech, Cardinal
Set Path to Papacy
Wall Street Journal, by Stacy Meichtry    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/16/2013 7:48:58 AM     Post Reply
VATICAN CITY—It took Jorge Mario Bergoglio four minutes to convince fellow cardinals he was their leader. Speaking in the Paul VI grand hall of the Vatican, the Argentine cardinal warned the Catholic Church against focusing too much on matters close to home—advice that came against the backdrop of a papacy that had been consumed by infighting among Vatican officials, a dwindling flock in Europe and secular trends in the West. The 76-year-old Father Jorge, as he is known back home, said Roman Catholicism needed to shift its focus outward, to the world beyond Rome—rather than being "self-referential," he said.

Obama in Jerusalem
New York Sun, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/16/2013 7:43:15 AM     Post Reply
When President Obama gets to Jerusalem next week, one of the signals to listen for is an indication of what country he thinks he’s in. Normally this is clear when the President — any president — goes to the capital of a foreign country. He’s in whatever country the capital is capital of. But Mr. Obama has been refusing to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Not only that, but he has been refusing to admit that Jerusalem is even in Israel.

President Obama bombs in
comments about a nuclear Iran
New York Daily News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/16/2013 7:28:35 AM     Post Reply
Approaching his first presidential trip to Israel, President Obama offered a fresh and foolish — if not feckless — assessment of the Iranian nuclear threat. "Right now, we think it would take over a year or so for Iran to actually deliver a nuclear weapon, but obviously we don’t want to cut it too close,” the President told an Israeli television interviewer, in the process cutting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu off at the knees and giving the mullahs breathing room to keep enriching uranium.

What Rand Paul got right
Los Angeles Times, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/12/2013 7:28:03 AM     Post Reply
I hope I´m not too late to the fight.Last week, freshman Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) held an old-fashioned filibuster against the nomination of John Brennan to head the CIA. Paul´s stated reason for taking to the floor and talking for 13 hours was that the Obama administration wouldn´t give him a straight answer on the question of whether the president can unilaterally order the killing of American citizens on American soil with "lethal force, such as a drone strike … and without trial."

No, 80 Percent of NYC High School
Graduates Are Not Illiterate
New York Magazine, by Adam Martin    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/9/2013 1:10:10 PM     Post Reply
An unfortunate story on CBS New York Thursday carried this headline: "Officials: 80 Percent Of Recent NYC High School Graduates Cannot Read." It´s a shocker, but it´s also untrue. And to make things worse, the story that followed was riddled with typos. According to the New York Post, which reported the same story earlier on Thursday, "79.3 percent of city public-school grads who went to CUNY’s six two-year colleges arrived without having mastered the basics" of reading, writing, and math, and had to take non-credit remedial classes to catch up.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Obama´s Demeaning
Commencement Address

59 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Janice Shaw Crouse    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/10/2013 6:54:38 AM     Post Reply
As a presidential speech writer for the first Bush White House, I am always very interested in what presidents say in their formal speeches. They know, of course, that their remarks will be widely covered by the press, studied by analysts, and influential in contemporary political debates. For that reason, presidents rarely speak off-the-cuff, and their every word is carefully chosen for exactly the message the White House wants to convey to the public. Their graduation speeches, like all presidential addresses, go through many drafts and are reviewed by high-level administration officials

Earthquake: Did Carney
Presser End MSM Monolith?

58 replie(s)
PJ Media, by David Steinberg    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/10/2013 8:54:15 PM     Post Reply
The most notable takeaway from Jay Carney’s incomprehensible Friday appearance had little to do with his Klingon grammar. Carney does not represent the historical value of the event – you should be wise to forget his performance, and instead take note that he was flanked by the entire room, without exception. Do not underestimate the significance: the Obama administration has not faced such an onslaught of truth-seeking since he took office in 2008, and further, no Democratic administration has been charged from all sides like this in recent memory. That press conference was unthinkable just days ago

Carney Blames Romney for
Politicizing Benghazi

48 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/10/2013 9:49:16 PM     Post Reply
Friday, White House press secretary Jay Carney blamed Mitt Romney and Republicans for “politicizing” the Benghazi terrorist attacks. Harkening back to a Mitt Romney press conference on September 12, 2012, which addressed the Benghazi attacks only in passing while focusing instead on the assault on the American embassy in Cairo, Egypt, Carney suggested that Romney had tried to target the innocent Obama administration for telling the truth about Benghazi. “Republicans, again, in this ongoing effort that began in the hours after the attack when Mitt Romney put out a press release to try to take political

Latino student group says eating
tacos is offensive to Mexicans

46 replie(s)
Daily Caller [Washington DC], by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/9/2013 6:12:54 PM     Post Reply
Northwestern University continued to stumble over diversity issues this week as Mexican students voiced disagreement with a campuswide letter that advised students not to celebrate Cinco de Mayo by engaging in racially-offensive activities, such as eating tacos and drinking tequila. The letter was sent to students via e-mail, and published in The Daily Northwestern last week. Leaders of Alianza, a Latino student group, and the Associated Student Government called on students to remember that Cinco de Mayo commemorates Mexico’s victory over France in the Battle of Puebla. It is not a day to throw a sombrero-themed party, they said.

Exclusive: Benghazi Talking
Points Underwent 12 Revisions,
Scrubbed of Terror Reference

46 replie(s)
ABC News, by Jonathan Karl    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/10/2013 6:54:20 AM     Post Reply
When it became clear last fall that the CIA’s now discredited Benghazi talking points were flawed, the White House said repeatedly the document were put together almost entirely by the intelligence community, but White House documents reviewed by Congress suggest a different story. ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they were extensive edited as they evolved from the drafts first written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before she appeared on five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.

White House hopes under fire
43 replie(s)
Boston Herald, by Joe Battenfeld    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/10/2013 5:37:55 AM     Post Reply
She weathered Whitewater. She made it past Monica ?Lewinsky. Now Hillary Clinton is hoping to beat the rap on Benghazi and make it to the White House. The Clinton political machine is in full campaign mode already, preparing for 2016 and hoping voters forget by then that she had a key role in the Obama administration’s handling of the terror attack. But that’s becoming more difficult as the GOP appears to be laying the groundwork for tying Clinton to Benghazi and making sure it stays front and center in the next campaign.Some of the testimony from State Department whistleblowers

Benghazi Whistleblower Attorney:
Congress Must Subpoena Hillary
Clinton to Testify Again

40 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/10/2013 10:05:44 PM     Post Reply
Earlier today, we learned about a bombshell report that said the CIA´s Benghazi talking points were changed 12 times, with extensive input from the State Department. It comes after State Department whistleblower Gregory Hicks testified Wednesday that he was shocked when he saw Susan Rice blaming a protest for the attack on numerous talk shows. Martha MacCallum discussed the next steps in the investigation of what happened in Benghazi with Hicks´ attorney, Victoria Toensing. At this point, she thinks "it´s about time" that House Republicans start issuing subpoenas,

Pelosi: Sequestration Preventing Me
from Visiting Troops on Mother´s Day

39 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/10/2013 5:55:08 AM     Post Reply
"Every year for the past few years, on Mother´s Day, I´ve gone--I´ve taken a delegation--into Afghanistan or Iraq, we´re alternating now, now Afghanistan--for Mother´s Day to say thank you to our moms and, by the way, our grandmothers, who are serving there. Some young grandmothers. But, nonetheless, grandmothers. To also thank all of our troops for what they do to protect America´s families. I won´t be going this particular weekend because we don´t have--you know, under sequestration, we don´t have codels."

The Benghazi Lie
36 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Mark Steyn    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/10/2013 5:16:17 PM     Post Reply
Shortly before last November’s election I took part in a Fox News documentary on Benghazi, whose other participants included the former governor of New Hampshire John Sununu. Making chit-chat while the camera crew were setting up, Governor Sununu said to me that in his view Benghazi mattered because it was “a question of character.” That’s correct. On a question of foreign policy or counterterrorism strategy, men of good faith can make the wrong decisions. But a failure of character corrodes the integrity of the state. That’s why career diplomat Gregory Hicks’s testimony

Report: Muslim cleric invited
to pray over fallen SEALs
damns them during service

32 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Jessica Chasmar    Original Article
Posted By: ScarletPimpernel- 5/9/2013 6:23:57 PM     Post Reply
The families of Navy SEALs killed in an August 2011 shoot-down of a helicopter in Afghanistan spoke at a press conference Thursday morning, citing a number of grievances, including an allegation that the Pentagon invited a Muslim cleric who “disparaged in Arabic the memory of these servicemen.” In addition to blasting the Obama administration for the mission and for an official investigation they deemed a cover-up, the families complained that “military brass, while prohibiting any mention of a Judeo-Christian God, invited a Muslim cleric to the funeral for the fallen

IRS Apologizes for Targeting
Conservative Groups

32 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Stephen Ohlemacher    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/10/2013 11:14:39 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service is apologizing for inappropriately flagging conservative political groups for additional reviews during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status. Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS unit that oversees tax-exempt groups, said organizations that included the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their applications for tax-exempt status were singled out for additional reviews. Lerner said the practice, initiated by low-level workers in Cincinnati, was wrong and she apologized while speaking at a conference in Washington. Many conservative groups complained during the election

Report: Patriots coach Bill Belichick
´hates´ Tim Tebow as a player

32 replie(s)
CBS News, by Ryan Wilson    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 5/10/2013 10:10:49 PM     Post Reply
It´s been 11 days and counting since the Jets cut ties with Tim Tebow and 13 months since they traded for him. Much of the conversation in the past week and a half has been about which teams -- if any -- would be interested in the former Heisman Trophy winner. The usual suspects include Tebow´s hometown Jacksonville Jaguars, but new general manager David Caldwell has said in no uncertain terms that Tebow isn´t an option (laudatory commercials from local lawyers notwithstanding). The other, less conventional landing spot: New England. Coach Bill Belichick sees value where other talent evaluators don´t


Post Reply   Close thread 717051





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS