Not only no, but Hell NO!

I´v already called six legislators. You?

If We, the People sit on our hands and allow this ban to take place a dictatorship is all but assured! The Democrats think that the wind is at their backs on this issue due to the CT tragedy! We have to push back with all of our might or we will become subjects is a socialist state and at the mercy of those that will prey on us! I, for one say over my dead body!

Feinstein wants to let you keep the ´grandfathered´ guns, but....she wants you registered, fingerprinted, and photographed if you do! Smile for the camera! You can wipe the ink off your fingers on that towel!

Looks like I´d be a criminal.

My gut feeling is that they will ram this through like Obamacare. It will be over 1,000 pages long, be named "The Omnibus Citizen Protection and Gun Safety Bill", and the Supreme Court will eventually declare it valid.

Sickening.

Not sure if such a ban would pass constitutional muster because the Heller decision stated that handguns in "common usage" could not be banned. Of course such a challenge would take years to sort out, and after Obamacare, who the heck can predict how the SCOTUS will rule?

Write your congresspeople. Join the NRA. Contribute to the NRA-ILA and the Second Amendment Foundation.

Registration and confiscation schemes did not go well in Feinstein´s home state of CA. Local LE types weren´t about to go door-to-door, and if they did lawyers were circling like vultures waiting to take the state/local entities to court. They were even taking out ads in the fishwraps on advising gun owners how to proceed if, and big if, LE should show up at the front door. This is a lot of bluster for a lady who carries concealed.

We need to ask: How will your local police respond? Are they on the side of the Bill of Rights, or are they on the side of a ´want a be dictator´ who has been pumping money into their ´war chests´ for the last four years?
Our county police dept. has purchased several military type vehicles and several Barrett .50 cal rifles and other goodies all thanks to Obummer´s stimulis bill. Who do they plan to use these on! It sure isn´t the radical muslims!

They would do well to remember that the Battle of Concord Bridge was fought to keep the British from seizing the people´s arsenal.

This, to me, would be the last straw.

#9 asks a very good question. There are many police officers who really don´t believe you need a handgun.

And how will registration be enacted/enforced?

Also, "Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic"

What is a "military characteristic"? I suspect that they could deem all semiautomatic rifles handguns, and shotguns to have "at least one" such characteristic.

Is a Beretta 380 with 13 round clip on the "Ban" list? If so, I hope my cell mate will be a 90 yr old blind man who will leave me alone.

Looks like the tree of liberty may be coming due for a watering - this is Stalin stuff here folks. - call your representative post haste.

Expect the CrapMedia to begin labeling the GOP as `purveyors of death` in an attempt to shame them into voting for this gun grabbing piece of garbage.

After registration will come confiscation and the exterminations of a now disarmed citizenry. Their 900 exempted weapons came out about a month before the CT tradgedy. Planned gun control? Before the stolen election, the NRA warned that obozo was going to introduce radical gun control measures. The NRA was right!

Tenth ammendment.


10Th ammendment.

This 2 chances of passing the Senate, none and NOT!

All of this from the gun-carrying, security detailed Diane Feinstein. What a hypocrite. Another piece of legislation that the Demonrats had prepared (and left in a drawer) for just such a situation. When will someone, anyone, put a stop to the all controlling far Left Demonrat party?

What is it about the 2nd amendment they don´t understand?

In response to #9, I´m pretty sure I know what local, county and state law enforcement in this part of the country would NOT do, and that is take part in the confiscation of weapons. The National Guard won´t participate either. Those folks are neighbors, friends, family, and all own personal firearms themselves, the same as virually every person that I know (and I meet many, many people). I realize that people from the large, "bright blue" urban areas and/or northern and west coast states may have less confidence in the authorities. If the fools in DC wnat some "social upheaval", they are on the right path with this idiocy from the CA whats-her-name.

A good counter to this action would be to start hundreds of local militias to make sure that there is a coordinated response to any government misdeeds like this. These people can not be allowed to confiscate our property or we spit in the faces of all patriots who came before us and did what had to be done. These people and their ear leader sound stupid for what they are proposing but it will produce the same results that a smart guy like Hitler would want.

No. That is all. No.

We just renewed our NRA membership for two years. We are getting a black duffle bag with gold NRA lettering as a gift from the NRA!
So, there, Feinschwein and Upchuck Schumer!

Essentially, they want to add semi-autos to the NFA and treat new ones as post ´86 machineguns. That´s gonna be a hard sell for them.

People that are not qualified to mess with fire should not mess with it...be careful not to open Pandora´s Box, it just might not shut!

Headline should read "Democrats Seek to Start New Civil War"!

It´s Jan,. 1861 Folks,=Civil War II. we are headed down the road.

Register voters, not guns.

Hmmm, the lucatics are pushing for a revolution faster than I thought. But really, you cannot utter the would logic or reason in the same sentenance as feinstein or democrat.

I see Drudge has Feinstein´s proposal as the main story and is linked as "Civil War: Senate To Go For Handguns."

I understand headlines inherently have an element of hyperbole to pull readers in. However, before those less aware dismiss Drudge´s headline concerning Feinstein´s proposal as mere hyperbole, they had best take a look at the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the first battles of the American Revolution.

There are those who will take to arms to defend the Constitution of the United States and the God-given rights it was enacted to protect.

While these may be seen as extreme measures by those in ruling elite, the reality is this is no more "extreme" than a government - whose only power is that delegated to it by the People - which would forcibly (at the pain of death, if necessary) disarm law abiding citizens.

As many here are aware, the Left´s call for the disarmament of individuals has noting to do with safety, and everything to do with raw power. The Left relies upon compulsion as its means of enacting its policies, however, ultimately, armed men and women will resist tyranny.

"One military characteristic" could be defined as any semi-automatic firearm having a trigger, because all military small arms have a trigger. The liberals would do that in a minute if they thought such a definition would ban more firearms.

How about your gun collection, the "grandfathered" guns in which could no longer be transferred when you die to your sons and daughters, instead they would then be confiscated by the ATF.

As far as national firearms registration goes, I think the Canadians just got rid of their registration system that they found was too expensive and did not deter anyone from doing anything bad.

Gee, if only voter registration were as difficult as what DiFi suggests.

/s off/

Will the House vote for this? Boehner doesn´t even have to let it come up for a vote, does he? Reid never lets bills the House passes come up.

#7 Not so. Remember we all thought tha Obama Care would be called foul. Roberts bailed on the conservative justices and said it was okay. Look what we are stuck with now. Myu guess he will bail again along with stevens. I don´t want it to go to the supreme court.

Not gunna happen.

Well it worked out well when the Serbs had all this information in Srebrenica, why wouldn´t we want it here? /s

Molon Labe !!

Not to be inflammatory, but I wonder if certain "government employees" at all levels are deciding which side they´ll be on.

Choose wisely.

Ever since Great Britten and Australia introduced strict gun control laws their crime rates have increased a lot. The only persons with guns are he crooks. The rest are victims. Another Democrat folly! They have a lot lately.

This will be absolute political suicide for anyone but those like Finkstink and Waxnose. It could also lead to much worse things, if you catch my drift.