A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


The Assault Weapon Ban Would
Have Never Passed If
It Wasn´t For Ronald Reagan

BuzzFeed, by Andrew Kaczynski

Original Article

Posted By:MissMolly, 12/20/2012 6:28:18 AM

In 1994, former President Ronald Reagan´s health was still good enough for him to, occasionally, participate in politics, and his agenda that year was clear: Helping President Bill Clinton pass the Assault Weapons Ban. Reagan had been an ardent supporter of stricter gun laws after his presidency for intensely personal reasons, as he wrote in a 1991 op-ed in the New York Times entitled "Why I´m for the Brady Bill." "´Anniversary´ is a word we usually associate with happy events that we like to remember: birthdays, weddings, the first job.

Comments:
Why would anyone want or need any guns beyond a handgun for personal protection and various hunting equipment?

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Mazeman, 12/20/2012 6:35:24 AM     (No. 9075653)

The first amendment rights of some people should similarly be limited to a sheet of paper and a crayon.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: patpgmr, 12/20/2012 6:36:35 AM     (No. 9075657)

Which just goes to show you that good people can be ignorant of the truth about firearms. That bill did nothing that they said it would do. It banned things that were trivial; just as well, in my opinion.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 12/20/2012 6:51:02 AM     (No. 9075681)

Hinkley´s ´assault weapon´ was a .22 caliber Röhm RG-14 revolver. When we´re talking about firearms, this one , though potentially deadly, is about as small as you can get. Even Ronald Reagan was capable of decisions based on emotion if he thought of this as an assualt weapon.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Jethro bo, 12/20/2012 6:53:25 AM     (No. 9075685)

The scary looking guns ban was not effective. THe exception is it might dry up the supply that Obambi and Holder use to run guns to drug lords in Mexico. So it might, just might, save some Mexican peasants lives. But it will not stop drug related deaths in this country. It will not stop domestic deaths in this country and it will not stop mass murderers from committing mass murder.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 12/20/2012 7:06:28 AM     (No. 9075706)

It´s strictly bad form to engage in pronoucements or speculation on the topic of what people "need."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: blueline, 12/20/2012 7:16:24 AM     (No. 9075723)

OP: Why would anyone want or need a car with more than 100 hp? It´ll get you to the same destination, and it is less likely to be used or driven in a reckless manner than a 500hp muscle car, right? As citizens in a land of liberty, we allow people to own and use items in a lawful and responsible manner even if the item has no appeal to us, and may occasionally be used by others in a reckless and dangerous manner resulting in tragedy. I personally enjoy shooting the semi-auto tactical rifle (derisively referred to as the "assault rifle"). As long as I am responsible and lawful, why do you want to take it away from me? Incidentally, my "assault rifle" has not assaulted anyone to date, but I´m keeping a close eye on it. You can keep your muscle car as well. As a law-enforcement officer, I can assure you that passing a ban on these or any other type of weapon will NOT keep them away from criminals. It will only disarm people who pose no threat or danger to you, me, or anyone else. There are other, better ways to make us safer. They´re just not as politically sexy. Please don´t fall for the leftist hype.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Manitouman, 12/20/2012 7:20:14 AM     (No. 9075735)

One bright sunny day, as I lay over the edge of a hill listening to the impact of bullets hitting the trees surrounding me, I remember thinking that something like a high capacity AR style weapon would be more useful than the single shot hunting rifle clutched to my quivering self.

There are a few places you shouldn´t go while under gunned.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 12/20/2012 7:36:42 AM     (No. 9075756)

No self respecting gunman, military or terrorist, would EVER commence an "Assault" without a fully automatic weapon.

It says: BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR (roll tongue for full effect)

Not: Boom..boom...boom.

Why is this critical point always lost ?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: god of irony, 12/20/2012 7:37:11 AM     (No. 9075759)

OP perhaps you should read the 2d Amendment and the history behind it to answer your question.

When the assault weapon ban was lifted crime rates did not go up as predicted however in Australia when they ban personal weapons crime rates went up.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: chumley, 12/20/2012 7:43:48 AM     (No. 9075768)

A liberal casual friend asked OP´s question when I brought out my then new AK. My answer was I don´t need it. I´m a free and I want it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Brittany, 12/20/2012 8:04:39 AM     (No. 9075813)



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Brittany, 12/20/2012 8:08:54 AM     (No. 9075819)

Noted the snide remark about Reagan´s health while still in office. My son has the family guns and I was in NRA when guns were in my possession tho I don´t shoot. Thought we settled this in Supreme Court.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: sailor43, 12/20/2012 8:19:47 AM     (No. 9075836)

Goes to show that nobody, not even Reagan, is perfect.

He was weak on the gun issue, and the guns laws which prohibit responsible citizens from purchasing modern fully-automatic weapons were passed on his watch.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Liberal like Jefferson, 12/20/2012 8:24:17 AM     (No. 9075843)

The OP´s mindset is certainly ´progressive´. Using government to determine and authorize what people "need". That´s not the definition of a free society.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Davids918, 12/20/2012 8:24:19 AM     (No. 9075844)

So, why did the Democrats let the bill expire?
What, it would have been politically difficult?
So, they decided to protect their job as a politician instead of "doing the right thing"?

Then, they try to get cute by using the Fast and Furious scheme as means to illustrate the need for gun control only to bury the scandal because it´s killed 300+ Mexican citizens in Mexico, so isn´t as useful as they´d hoped.
Now, they want to use Newtown tragedy.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Liberal like Jefferson, 12/20/2012 8:31:45 AM     (No. 9075853)

...also, the Second Amendment wasn´t placed in the Constitution to protect hunting.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Pluperfect, 12/20/2012 8:53:29 AM     (No. 9075878)

The OP didn´t say should have or could have, she asked "want" or "need". A constitutional right to own and bear arms wasn´t being questioned.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: TunnelRat, 12/20/2012 9:09:08 AM     (No. 9075907)

Now we´re parsing what the meaning of "is" is.

As a rule, when the gun-banners come around, they ask, "Why do you need that?", and "Why would you want that?"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: vulcanrider, 12/20/2012 9:10:34 AM     (No. 9075909)

No, 17, it was implied, just like a good progressive. Let me explain something, no one, especially the government, will EVER determine what I "want or need", from the car I drive, the food in my house, or the weapons I choose to buy (with MY hard earned money). Get it?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: StormCnter, 12/20/2012 9:11:05 AM     (No. 9075910)

Sheesh! Some of these automatically jerking knees should be brought under control. I think we all got along just fine with our various firearms in the years before these horrendous weapons were developed. I know I have the right to own one, but thank you, no.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: shamrock, 12/20/2012 9:39:24 AM     (No. 9075956)

Because OP, they are a hoot to take to the range and shoot. There are 8 of us gals that meet twice a month and turn alot of ammo into noise then we have dinner. Do I need it, no, did my hubby buy me two because I wanted them, damn straight he did.

How many pairs of shoes, etc, fill in the blank do you need?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: chumley, 12/20/2012 10:18:24 AM     (No. 9076038)

I think OP´s question is whats so baffling. Free people intuitively understand about rights. They rarely feel the need to articulate why they "need" a particular weapon. Other free people rarely ask because the answer is understood by all. Its like asking someone why they need a newspaper or a water heater. We immediately become suspicious of anyone who suggests we must demonstrate a need.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: LouD, 12/20/2012 10:28:40 AM     (No. 9076058)

#20 the automatic weapon has been around a long time, but the first practical automatic was the maxim machine gun, invented in 1885. War with Spain, WW1 & 2, for starters shows we didn´t get along all that well since then. And before then, there was plenty of crime, murder, assault, etc. So I fail to see what period you are talking about where we all got along fine.
As for those who mentioned Fast and Furious, that pales alongside the gun-running by Obama through Libya to Syrian "rebels", where at least 40,000 have died.
As for needing such a weapon, #21 answered it with the question about how many shoes.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: rmsimms, 12/20/2012 10:38:20 AM     (No. 9076078)

Arguing with seminar posters sent here by some Soros group as astroturf support for gun control is a waste of time.

Reagan did back the Clinton Ban because he had promised Jim Brady he would back him no matter what he wanted to do....it´s common knowledge.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: curious1, 12/20/2012 10:52:50 AM     (No. 9076104)

Yes, the LPs, if they truly were interested in learning, have had three decades to learn from the peer-reviewed studies and constitutional research and public discussions. That the apparently disingenuous though ignorant questions keep turning up shows they aren´t serious about learning anything, because they don´t like the cold hard facts. They´re just stirring the pot until they get their way - which is what LPs (collectivists/communists/socialists/fascists/etc.)do. It´s just another front in their war on the Republic.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: dvc, 12/20/2012 10:56:51 AM     (No. 9076110)

The reliable lever action rifle with modern cartidges only existed for 12 years (1873-1885) before machine guns were available. The imaginary time when "those bad guns" didn´t exist is essentially fictional. Muzzle loaders to machine guns was about 25 yrs.

ANYONE could buy ANY machine gun from 1885 to 1934, and many thousands did. After that law, gun crime stopped, right? Actually, it didn´t change at all.

The modern sporting rifles LOOK LIKE the miliary weapons, just like you neighbor might have a Indy Pace Car Corvette, not really the same, JUST STYLING. Oh yeah, they were banned for a decade and mass shootings went UP that decade.

On top of this side show of intentional confusion of semi auto (one shot per trigger pull, same as a revolver) and machine guns, the fundamental point is that the 2nd Amendment is NOT about hunting or protection in the mall parking lot, those are just fringe benefits. The 2nd Amendment is about having the civilian population armed well enough to deter a despot from tyranny. This means military type of weapons, and frankly we do NOT have access to them now, only lower capability rifles. Read what the people that wrote the Consitution left by way of explanation of their intent. It is called the Federalist Papers, and for the historically ignorant, but with an open mind, it should be helpful.

Of course, no government could EVER enslave the people and maybe send them to gulags by the tens of thousands or intentionally starve them to death by the millions after removing all the food from a region, right? Study the Soviet examples of what happens to unarmed peasants some times.

I could never happen here, right?

Yes - as long as the populace is armed.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 12/20/2012 11:29:18 AM     (No. 9076163)

O.P. might care to reflet on the original intent of the Second, and how it has become more meaningful than ever before...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: CentralFLMom, 12/20/2012 5:41:15 PM     (No. 9076678)

I´m sorry, but I don´t believe that President Reagan would ever support a ban on guns or support that C word on any issue. I refuse to believe this article.
President Reagan is the reason that my family owns assault weapons, hand guns, rifles and attack weapons. We absolutely embrace his doctrine of carrying a big stick to deter enemies.
We are unapologetic about arming ourselves 24/7!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Question_Assumptions, 12/20/2012 6:27:55 PM     (No. 9076735)

Believing in liberty means no demanding that others justify their choices. If someone wants 20 handguns, a car with 500 horsepower, or a 10,000 square foot house, it doesn´t matter if I think they have a good reason for it or need it or even if they they think they have a good reason for it. It´s just not my business, nor should it be the government´s business. "You don´t need it," and, "I can´t understand it," are not compelling reasons to restrict someone else´s lierty.

In fact, the question that should be asked of every bit of legislation proposed in response to the recent massacre should be, "Would it have stopped the massacre?" If the answer is no, then the next question should be, "Why are you proposing this restriction?"

As for Ronald Reagan, I think he was a great President, but he made mistakes, including some big ones. For example, he signed California´s pre-Roe abortion legalization legislation.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Hays, 12/20/2012 9:43:41 PM     (No. 9076913)

Before 1986, a regular citizen could buy a fully automatic gun (machine gun) for the cost of the gun plus $200 tax, generally less than $1000 total. Then the law changed. Now, some of those guns sell for upward of $50k. Maybe, just maybe, people are buying them as investments. Why do people buy baseball cards, comic books, and beanie babies. Certainly those are less useful or practical things to collect than a gun.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: NYbob, 12/20/2012 11:01:21 PM     (No. 9076964)

OP, you imply that some citizens should not be ´allowed´ certain weapons which make you and others uncomfortable because they are somehow deadlier than other guns you might be more familiar with. If guns are inevitably going to be misused, ban all of them. Understanding that more innocent people will die as a result of being disarmed. Otherwise enforce the 20,000 laws involving waiting periods, fingerprinting, complete background checks, judges approval, sheriffs approval, signs, fines, and prohibitions. At the end of that you will still find ARMED criminals. Why don´t you do something about them, like supporting Project Exile which the NRA has been pleading for decades to have implemented in cities? Instead the champions of gun banning, like Bloomberg, Rendell, etc. plea bargain criminals back to your street.

AKs and ARs are soft shooting accurate, effective rifles. In the case of the AK, it is simple, reliable and cheap. People do use them for hunting and others stand on top of their stores during riots to protect their life savings. I´m not interested in hunting. I´m interested in freedom. What I use to defend my home or person is really none of your business. It has no affect on you or anyone else who does not attack me. Compare VT gun laws vs CT or NY laws and the results of all that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 716249




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"



Shot: Obamacare gets tangled
in Hatfield-McCoy feud
Washington Examiner [DC], by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/23/2014 5:45:06 AM     Post Reply
The leader of the feuding Hatfield family, who fears Obamacare will bankrupt the medical careers of his three children, is jumping into politics to help a West Virginia pharmacist win an open House seat to join the GOP effort to torpedo the president´s trademark program. “They’re going to be put of business,” Mark Hatfield said of three children: a pediatrician, a dentist and a pharmacist. “Obama’s destroyed health care,” he told Secrets. Hatfield is surviving face of the 1800s Hatfield & McCoy feud and the most famous surrogate for Ken Reed, a center-right candidate from Berkeley Springs, W.Va. Reed is one of

Five Buffalo Bills cheerleaders file class
suit claiming they were sexually harassed
and exploited out of 840 hours of pay EACH
Daily Mail [UK]*, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/23/2014 5:42:05 AM     Post Reply
Five former Buffalo Bills cheerleaders are suing the NFL team for unspecified damages, claiming they weren´t paid for their time at games or mandatory public appearances that left them open to groping and sexual comments. The lawsuit is the third filed this year against a National Football League team by its cheerleaders. The Oakland Raiders and Cincinnati Bengals also have pending wage battles. Two members of the Buffalo Jills squad held a news conference Tuesday with their attorney, Frank Dolce, explaining how they were each exploited out of ´840 hours of work´ and subjected to harassment, such as being told to sit of

Paterson’s pick, for the ages
Capital New York, by Jimmy Vielkind    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/22/2014 4:44:52 AM     Post Reply
ALBANY—Andrew Cuomo put in a written application for Hillary Clinton´s U.S. Senate seat, emphasizing in conversations with then-governor David Paterson that he was “available” for the job, according to interviews and newly available records. In addition, Kirsten Gillibrand, who was ultimately selected by Paterson to succeed Clinton, cemented her standing by commiserating with the governor after a mean-spirited parody on "Saturday Night Live;" teachers´ union leader Randi Weingarten was the only candidate who returned Paterson´s consolation call after the Gillibrand pick in Jan. 2009; and Caroline Kennedy got an unsolicited boost from Afghan president Hamid Karzai. Documents related to the appointment process

Err: NBC hired a ‘psychological
consultant’ to research David Gregory?
Hot Air, by Mary Katharine Ham    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/22/2014 4:34:23 AM     Post Reply
Good Lord, can someone just give Tapper a Sunday show and be done with it? As “Meet the Press” flails into third place under the leadership of David Gregory, and the institution of the Sunday show rides the downward slope toward irrelevance, NBC sent a psychologist to Gregory’s friends and family on a hunt for Gregory’s charm in an odd attempt to right the ship. But before we get to that, how bad is the Sunday scene? Schieffer’s winning overall and in the demo. The young people, they’re flocking to Bob over the 43-year-old Gregory: These days, the leader is “Face the

For The Children´s Sake,
Put Down That Smartphone
National Public Radio, by Patti Neighmond    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/22/2014 4:31:44 AM     Post Reply
It´s not just kids who are overdoing screen time. Parents are often just as guilty of spending too much time checking smartphones and e-mail — and the consequences for their children can be troubling. Dr. Jenny Radesky is a pediatrician specializing in child development. When she worked at a clinic in a high-tech savvy Seattle neighborhood, Radesky started noticing how often parents ignored their kids in favor of a mobile device. She remembers a mother placing her phone in the stroller between herself and the baby. "The baby was making faces and smiling at the mom," Radesky says, "and the mom

Prosecutor: Indicted art dealer, painter
were ´masters of forgery and deceit´
CNN, by Catherine E. Shoichet    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/22/2014 4:28:16 AM     Post Reply
Spanish art dealer Jose Carlos Bergantiños Diaz helped persuade wealthy buyers to shell out millions of dollars for works he claimed famous masters of modern art had painted. But in reality, U.S. authorities allege, the works he sold as Rothkos and Pollocks were fakes painted by an artist he met on a Manhattan street corner. The alleged scheme stretched for nearly two decades, involved several New York art galleries and earned the conspirators more than $30 million, according to an indictment unsealed in federal court on Monday. Last week, authorities closed in on Bergantiños and his brother, arresting them in Spain, federal prosecutors

How Jet Stowaways Can
Survive Cold, Lack of Oxygen
Associated Press, by Justin Pritchard    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/22/2014 4:16:46 AM     Post Reply
LOS ANGELES -- Despite the subzero temperatures and lack of oxygen, people can survive even a long journey in the wheel well of a jetliner. The latest example is a teenager who, according to authorities, stowed away on a 5 1/2-hour flight from San Jose, Calif., to Hawaii. While the number of known stowaway attempts is few, people have survived with surprising frequency. HOW DANGEROUS ARE THE CONDITIONS? Very. At 38,000 feet - the cruising altitude of the Hawaiian Airlines flight that the FBI says the 15-year-old took Sunday - the outside air temperature is about minus 85 degrees. The

A rancher´s armed battle against the US
government is standard libertarian fare
Guardian [UK], by Kieran Suckling    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/21/2014 8:10:33 AM     Post Reply
Perhaps the most remarkable feature of American democracy is the magnificent estate of public land that it reserved from the very beginning for the use of all citizens, rich or poor. There is nothing like it in the democracies of Europe, which came into being with nations already carved up into private fiefdoms. The Great Idea that hundreds of millions of acres of forests, deserts, rivers and prairies should be owned by, and managed for, the public interest has had a profound and lasting influence on American culture. But not everyone has accepted it. Cliven Bundy’s armed standoff with the National Park

Congress breaks, Capitol repairs begin
The Hill [DC], by Rachel Huggins    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/21/2014 5:39:59 AM     Post Reply
While lawmakers skip out of Washington for spring break, the Capitol Rotunda is undergoing its first makeover in more than 50 years. With more than 1,300 cracks marring its exterior shell, the rotunda is closed to the public from April 12 through April 28, in phase one of the two-year, $60 million restoration project. During the 17-day closure, workers are installing safety netting around the iconic 8.9 million-pound cast iron dome. "This netting will ensure the safety of all who enter the Capitol for the duration of the two-year project allowing the Rotunda to be accessible for the duration of the project after

Giant cruise ships that block the Venice
views and threaten foundations are to be
banned from passing through city´s heart
Independent [UK], by Michael Day    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/21/2014 4:47:48 AM     Post Reply
Monstrous cruise ships that ruin the view – and even block out the sun – for people strolling down Venice’s Giudecca Canal, will, from the end of November, no longer pass close to the lagoon city, cruise ship owners have pledged. From that date vessels weighing over 96,000 tonnes will eschew the route that currently sees them pass close to St Mark’s Square, while, according to campaigners who want them banned, unleashing huge currents that threatens to undermine Venice’s delicate foundations. The Cruise Lines International Association made the pledge during talks on Thursday with Italy’s Transport and Environment Ministers. The development follows a

1889: What the White House
Easter Egg Roll Looked Like
National Journal, by Brian Resnick    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/20/2014 5:53:47 AM     Post Reply
President Benjamin Harrison had a crisis. A child had let go of a balloon in the White House, during the Easter Egg roll on April 22, 1889. And we all know how hard it can be to get a balloon down from the corner of a ceiling, lest deal with the child suddenly stripped of a most prized and buoyant plaything. The guests noticed. "Here it remained during the afternoon, and was subject of universal comment as to the best means to be resorted to in order to get it down again," a Washington Post reporter wrote of the day´s

Caught! USPS worker who was in ´unspeakable
pain´ claimed $300k in disability checks for five
years while spending his time fishing in Alaska
Daily Mail [UK], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/20/2014 5:50:01 AM     Post Reply
A former U.S. Postal Service employee in Anchorage was arraigned Friday on charges he accepted at least $334,000 in disability and worker´s comp payments while he spent his summers fishing. The U.S. attorney´s office says in a Friday release that 56-year-old Amacio Zamora Agcaoili Jr. was indicted by a federal grand jury on 18 counts, including theft of government funds. They claim every summer between 2009 and 2013, he went dipnetting and fishing on multiple occasions despite being on disability. Agcaoili faces 18 counts, including charges of wire, Social Security and Federal Employees Compensation Act fraud, as well as theft



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Obama to free hundreds of drug
felons under clemency rules
designed to un-do mandatory
sentences from ´War on Drugs´ era

54 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/21/2014 11:37:51 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is poised to entertain a flood of new clemency applications from thousands of federal prisoners who were given harsh sentences under mandatory-minimum laws following drug convictions, Attorney General Eric Holder said Monday. Holder said in a short videotaped statement that he wants to shrink the federal prison population by a modest amount while ensuring ´that those who have paid their debts have a chance to become productive citizens.´ At the center of the move is a set of old sentencing rules that punished crack-cocaine offenders with more time behind bars than users or traffickers of powder cocaine.

Dole: Cruz, Paul & Rubio
lack experience for 2016

44 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Mario Trujillo    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 11:18:06 AM     Post Reply
Former Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.) said a number of junior GOP senators considering a presidential run in 2016 do not yet have the experience — specifically naming Rand Paul (Ky.), Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Ted Cruz (Texas). The former 1996 GOP presidential candidate sounded particularly skeptical of Cruz in an interview this week with The Wichita Eagle. "A number of the younger members, first-termers like Rand Paul, Rubio and that extreme-right-wing guy, Ted Cruz — all running for president now. I don´t think they´ve got enough experience yet," Dole said. The 90-year-old former senator said, however, his main concern about 2016 is living

Jeb Bush is your only chance
against Hillary, Republicans

42 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Bob Schrum    Original Article
Posted By: quantumman- 4/22/2014 6:32:54 AM     Post Reply
If Jeb reaches for the nomination, there will be a titanic battle between the party establishment and the Tea Party. Steve Schmidt, McCain’s strategist in 2008, insists that in the end Republicans usually settle on the most electable candidate. To get by, this Bush may be forced to trim his positions, although the cautionary tale of Romney suggests that he would have to tack artfully and carefully for the sake of the general election. Certainly he will have the resources to outlast, discredit, and disqualify his rivals.

Benghazi attack could have been prevented if
US hadn´t ´switched sides in the War on Terror´
and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach
al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report

41 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 7:02:40 PM     Post Reply
The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn´t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier. ´The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,´ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline. She blamed the Obama administration

Michelle Obama:
´splurging is the key to life´

40 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/21/2014 9:31:25 PM     Post Reply
Washington - Michelle Obama said "splurging is the key to life" if you regularly eat right and stay active. Her biggest guilty pleasure: French fries. "How would you appreciate vegetables if you never had chocolate?" she asked. "You couldn´t live without a little chocolate, a little French fries." The first lady took questions from children reporters Monday after appearing at the White House Easter Egg Roll. She told the children that if they eat right the majority of the time, then a splurge or snack is not going to hurt them. "I still splurge when I can, but that's why I try to exercise almost every day," she said.

Fraud runs rampant in Census Bureau
37 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Crudele    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 5:03:20 AM     Post Reply
There’s a pattern of falsifying statistics throughout the entire Census Bureau. And anyone who attempts to blow the whistle on the fraud is either retaliated against or ignored, according to two new sources who have experienced the process firsthand. As I’ve been writing for more than six months, the Census Bureau office in Philadelphia uncovered a case of fraud in 2010, did nothing about it and allowed the practice to continue. In that instance, a data collector named Julius Buckmon was faking reports that went into the nation’s all-important jobless tally and consumer-inflation survey. Because the Census Bureau’s surveys are scientific — meaning

Professor: ‘Colleges Will Start Closing Up’ if
‘Racist, Misogynist, Money-Grubbing’ GOP Wins

36 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/22/2014 4:42:50 PM     Post Reply
New audio reveals an Eastern Connecticut State University professor warning that Republicans will “want things to go back — not to to 1955, but to 1855? if they win control of Congress in November. Republican victories could also put him out of a job, he cautioned. “We will live in a very, very, very different kind of country if that happens,” Professor Brent Terry told students in his Introduction to Creative Writing course, according to audio obtained by Campus Reform. “I mean, colleges will start closing up if these people have their way.” Over the course of his rant, Terry characterized conservatives

Why Does Nation Tolerate A
Habitual Liar As President?

34 replie(s)
Investors Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/22/2014 2:10:54 PM     Post Reply
Public Trust: Sixty-one percent polled say President Obama lies "some of the time" or "most of the time" on matters of national importance. Americans have to ask: Why do we let him get away with it? It´s no surprise that a Fox News poll of 1,012 registered voters last week found immense distrust of a president whose main domestic initiative was based on a lie. The shock is that the same poll found his disapproval level down to its lowest since last fall. Asked, "How often do you think Barack Obama lies to the country on important matters?" 37% replied "most of

Would YOU be underwater if the
polar caps melted? Map reveals
what our planet would look like
if sea levels rose by 260ft

33 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Ellie Zolfagharifard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/21/2014 5:20:21 PM     Post Reply
Global sea levels have risen by 8 inches (20cm) since 1880 and scientists predict they could rise up to 3ft (98cm) by 2100. But despite the UN’s recent threats of war, famine and extreme weather, such a dramatically different world caused by sea level rise can be hard to imagine. To help picture the future, Martin Vargic, an amateur graphic designer from Slovakia, has created a map depicting the planet with sea levels around 260ft (79m) higher than they are today. He imagines what Earth would look like if the ice sheets surrounding the North and South poles melted, releasing

Reid: ´We Are a Nation of Laws,
Not of Men and Women´

33 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Susan Jones    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/22/2014 10:53:27 AM     Post Reply
It may not be tomorrow, but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) says "something will happen" to force a Nevada rancher to obey a court order to stop grazing his cattle on federal land and pay his grazing fees. "It´s obvious that you can´t just walk away from this," Reid said in an April 18 interview with a Nevada´s KSNV-TV News 3 program “What’s Your Point?” "You can´t have a law that is -- we´re a nation of laws, not of men and women," he said. (Video) Reid noted that most cattlemen pay their taxes, pay their fees, and follow

38 Republican lawmakers put aside differences
for lawsuit challenging legality of Obamacare

30 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Dave Boyer    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/22/2014 5:20:31 AM     Post Reply
Thirty-eight Republican lawmakers, including such unlikely bedfellows as John McCain of Arizona and Ted Cruz of Texas, have joined to support a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Affordable Care Act and accusing the president of repeatedly ignoring the law he signed for political reasons. The lawmakers have signed onto a legal brief in support of a lawsuit filed by Sen. Ron Johnson, the Wisconsin Republican who is asking a federal court to overturn Obamacare’s special treatment for members of Congress and their staffs. “The unlawful executive action at issue in this case is not an isolated incident,” the brief

A Marine´s story: Women set up
to fail USMC’s most grueling test

29 replie(s)
ABC News, by Martha Raddatz*    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/21/2014 11:13:10 AM     Post Reply
At a petite 5’3’’, Sage Santangelo may not look like a combat fighter at first glance. But the female second lieutenant has never let that hold her back from pursuing her dream of becoming an infantry officer in the Marine Corps. Growing up, Santangelo found she was always able to keep up with the guys and enjoyed playing hockey on all boys’ teams. But when she joined the Marines, Santangelo found the playing field changed; she was segregated into female-only training units and as a woman, was relegated to less strenuous physical training than her male counterparts. And that’s why,


Post Reply   Close thread 716249





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

NQ