Outgoing Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) appeared on Fox News Sunday where he was asked about the mass shooting in his home state and what kind of legislative solutions that lawmakers in Washington could pursue to make sure this situation never occurs again. Lieberman said that producers of violent movies and video games must be asked to “tone it down,” because violence in entertainment is “a causative factor” leading to incidences of violence. Chris Wallace noted that children are exposed to thousands of acts of violence in video games and television in their youth and wondered if policy makers Staff has corrected headline.
Anyone who has ever played or even examined closely one of the immensely popular(and lucrative) "shooter" video games will wonder why such horrible massacres are not more common than they actually are(so far). The media would do Americans a service by showing short clips of these games so that those who are unaware of them can see for themselves what they are like.
The graphic, pornographic violence, of course, is everywhere in the entertainment media today. Besides political correctness, one of the great attractions of zombie shows and games is that the gruesome, graphic murder of figures that resemble, but in theory are not human beings can be practiced with joyous and even meritorious abandon.
Then there is rap. White teenagers have always been the biggest market. A Google search for "violent rap lyrics" will enlighten those who do not yet know just how bad such trash actually is.
Gun control cultists will never admit that these factors are as important as they are. For the gun control cultist, guns are a kind of synecdoche. They fix their gaze on the tool to avoid the truly disturbing things, not least of which is the innate human capacity for absolute evil. The latter, being ineradicable, should not be encouraged nor rationalized by make-believe stories and "shooter" games. Those whose only solution is the reflex to control guns are really in a state of denial. The situation is far worse than they are willing to allow.
Unlike guns, violent video games have no essential purpose. I´d never advocate that government should step in and ban these ultraviolent games. Instead, there needs to be social pressure placed on the so-called entertainment industry to stop making them. What we are seeing is a manifestation of ´garbage in, garbage out´.
Having watched my son play some of these games, I get it. You shoot other people. It´s actually pretty fun, and no one gets hurt. But normal people don´t blur the line from video games to reality and start shooting up schools.
I actually think the horror movies are way more graphic and disturbing. Can anyone sit through one of the Saw movies and not lose a tiny bit of their humanity?
Every year the games and movies become ever more violent and depraved. Do they influence behavior? Of course they do. They probably don´t affect well-adjusted people but you can bet that the mentally unstable are affected in plenty of undesirable ways.
Hollywood will never admit this. They will just keep trying to outdo each other in the violence and porn race to the bottom.
Bans of something by government just tend to create a large underground market for it. See ´prohibition´ for an example. What we got from that was the mafia.
Social pressure on producers of all the extreme violence would work better because then we are hitting them in the pocketbook. Isn´t that the way the market is supposed to work?
I am absolutely not for all the extreme violence in our nation´s entertainment. It offends me deeply as a Christian. But I am not confident that enough of our society has the morals necessary to put the pressure needed on these producers. Too many people are enjoying this sick garbage as their ´guilty little pleasure´ and see no need to give it up. Very sad for them.
Though I understand and fully agree with the choices made by #8, I am afraid it is not possible to avoid exposure to a depraved and violent popular culture, no more than it is possible for someone living on a toxic waste dump nor in a dangerous radioactive zone to escape exposure to their poisonous effects. There are naturally different modes of exposure and a variety of harmful effects. The murdered mother, teachers and children, as well as the suicide of the shooter represent one form of exposure and negative -in this case, lethal- effects. It is most unlikely that any of the victims was a direct consumer of violent pop culture - unless, as one undoubtedly should, they regard the shooter himself as a victim of that culture.
Media isn´t pulling off this ´increase in violence´ on it´s own. Earlier today, a story informs us the Federal DOE is upset over ´discipline, suspensions and arrests´ of *minority* or ´otherwise disenfranchised´ youth, claiming the schools are disciplining too many boys. These would be the same schools that display zero tolerance for something like possession of an aspirin, but are now so politically correct and over-administrated - that any *meaningful* discipline of kids in the public schools is anathema.
There was a time in the US when children were actually disciplined in a sensible fashion - now, the teacher or parent who disciplines a child is likely to face some discipline on their own.
Media doesn´t operate in a vacuum - but it certainly starts the ball rolling downhill at an early age these days - and Lieberman - in mentioning ´games and movies´ leaves out the most damaging of all - the culture fostered via the music industry. The explosion of rap and youth gangs is a pretty solidly linked timeline, and nowhere is this more evident than the President´s ´home town´ of Chicago - which now has an annual body count exceeding Afghanistan.
It seems we are now - as a nation - more concerned with the ´self esteem´ of children, rather than any actual adult or societal responsibility in raising them.
We watched Lieberman this morning with Chris Wallace. Lieberman´s first comments were about ´gunshows´ and ´loopholes´. Joe, Joe.... The maniac stole his mother´s weapons. He did not go to a gunshow and take advantage of those fabled leftist loopholes. Joe, please knock it off.
#3. Here is the problem with your statement above: ´´ ´´shooter´´ video games will wonder why such horrible massacres are not more common than they actually are(so far).´´
You write (so far). It seems that this same conversations about violent games and movies has been discussed for decades. Millions upon millions of people have watched and/or played them. Rarely (fortunately) one of these tragedies occurs and people blame guns and violent media. If the influence was that great, you would think it would occur more often. Some people are just tormented sick people. Nothing anyone can do will ever change that. I am not defending the violence in media, I am also quite disturbed by it. I just don´t see the correlation.
The senator has no credibility with me, but heck, even a broken clock is correct twice a day. I once saw a little boy playing video games. He squealed with delight at the decapitation and disembowelment of the characters. I asked the parents why they allow their child to play this game. They thought I was being judgemental and reminded me it´s only make believe.
If this kid grows up with mental issues, at least, he has the techniques right for killing someone. The CT killer´s (don´t ever use his name) mental state probably upgraded to schizophrenia, so its quite possible he was reliving a videogame.
Expect the video game industry to come out swinging ´not their fault.´
Went to a crowded theater last night and saw The Hobbit. Of course, the place was filled with kids. There were unbelievably violent, disgusting previews of coming attractions that preceded this movie. It started with one about zombies getting shot and also falling in love. Then there were the monster alien movies and the new Tom Cruise movie. They also featured a preview of a film in which a young girl has to decide if she wants to join the dark side of witchcraft or not. All of these previews were introduced by saying that they are intended for "appropriate audiences." Ours was certainly not an "appropriate audience" for that attack on values. Then some Jimmy Kimmel fake commercial about a rapper who suddenly became awakened to family values came on making a mockery of parenting. And Hollywood says that Christian conservatives are preaching to the nation and ruining it?
I have to agree, both the hyper-violent movies and video games, are far worse threats than actual guns. Even the constant diet of perverts and super-criminals on tv shows, much milder than the movies, I think a bad influence.
Maybe most people can draw the lines between these things and reality, but maybe even that is a bad influence, because it makes you think there really IS something between the realities of violence and living peacefully. And then some maniac shows up on your doorstep and you were not wise enough to have a gun, you drew that line but you drew it wrong.
No easy answers here, but I share the senator´s concerns.
I disagree. I think parents should step in and determine whether or not their son or daughter should be exposed. There are already recommended ages for these games. If parents allow their children to play them and they´re kids aren´t mature enough to handle it, then don´t expose them to it.
Go away government. Don´t go away mad. Just go away.
Not this again. Both the left and the right raise this every time something horrible happens, but no link has ever been conclusively proven. The studies are either inconclusive or open to methodological criticism. And no, I don´t play video games or own a video game company or whatever.
I also wonder how much the news media plays into this, with their non-stop coverage. Does that give some with personality problems a reason to do this? Someone looking for some coverage? Who knows what causes someone to go off the deep end and kill others. What about gang violence why is that not covered to the extent this is, what about the innocents killed by gang violence, someone in the wrong place at the time of the killing?
Every problem as a simple solution that won´t work. For some reason, Americans believe that some magic bean can be found to end horrors like mass killings. No such bean exists. In this nation of over 313 million people a few are evil and/or mentally crazed. Gun control, video game control, Hollywood control, TV contol, "improved" school security...none of these will work. Bad things happen...
Aristotle says that it is the mark of an educated man to expect just such precision in demonstration as the subject itself permits(Nicomachean Ethics). Mathematics and politics involve different modes and levels of proof. Certitude is possible in one, probable or likely truth in the other.
Here in a nutshell is my reasoning about the contributory relation of pop culture to calculated and malicious spree killings by young males:
1. Gun availability is not new. If anything, it is less than in former times.
2. Evil is not new - at least to those who think there is such a thing as evil. It is, of course, the denial of evil that is new.
3. Mental illness is not new. For all the complaints about the rules and services available, more attention and effective treatment is available than ever.
4. What is new -besides spree killings of strangers by young males- is a massively depraved, violence and sex-saturated mass pop culture. Anyone can verify this for themselves by reviewing the top songs, movies and TV shows over the decades on Wikipedia.
5. THEREFORE it would appear that there is connection, possibly in some degree causal, between the two things that ARE new: (1) spree killings by young males, and (2) a depraved pop culture.
This is by no means a conclusive demonstration. It could well be mistaken. It is susceptible to analysis of all kinds of logical fallacies, e.g. post hoc propter hoc, petitio princinpii, etc. etc. etc.
Millions of people play these games & watch the movies......and......how many of them become killers..........HUH?
Millions of people are gun owners........and .....how many of them commit crimes.....HUH?
Society has become an enabler by interfering with the natural order of things. Make excuses for weird behavior in children, or better yet, put a label on the kid for life. There´s a place in the world for a swat on the butt, & if a teacher had spanked me in school, when I got home I would have been sitting on a pillow for days after my Dad got thru with me.
Don´t even get me started on the new buzz word.........bullying..!!! There has been bullying since the beginning of time. We use to know who was going to fight after school & where, off school grounds of course, wasn´t any of their business. The boys fought & usually left the area walking together, till next time. There´s a natural pecking order in all animals, including people, until "edikated" people get involved & have to justify their silly ideas.
Kids are not allowed to grow up as normal human beings. I can´t imagine how "damaged" kids are by being kept in a cocoon or "car seat" until they are almost old enough to drive, at least by my standards. I could drive stick shift before I could reach the pedal & see out the windshield at the same time. My son grew up standing in the middle of the back seat watching the world go by & I threw my arm out to stop him becoming a projectile, when necessary. Kids today will never grow up watching the outside world go by, because they´ve been stuck in a stupid seat, "so they´ll be safe".
I am not a lab rat of the progressives & neither is my family.
To note one contributory factor, e.g. a depraved pop culture, is not to negate the possibility of others. There can be little doubt, for example, that the classic problem of the Herostratic criminal outrage(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herostratus for details)has been magnified many times by the technology and use of modern mass communications. This could be a far bigger factor than we presently realize, one that could conceivably dwarf all others. (The crime of Herostratus, of course, is an example of evil in the form of human pride.)
"Shooter" video games keep score. So do potential mass murderers. It would probably be better not to devote as much attention to these horrible rampages as we are naturally inclined to do. Had every one of the Sandy Hook massacre victims died in a more conventional fashion, e.g. airplane crash or school bus accident, the loss would be just as great, but the publicity and its duration much less.
Thank you #22 and #25. This is again indeed. People have a need after such a tragedy to find a cause so they can prevent it. Guns for dems and video games for Republicans?
There are millions upon millions of gamers. The majority of them young men. I guess it´s as easy a correlation as guns.
Does anyone recall the young man a few years ago who was a life-long gamer before he began a career making violent war video games? He was driving one night, his pregnant wife at his side, when a non-gamer driver, high as a kite, drove head-on into his car. In a split-second this man decided to turn his car to take the brunt of the collision to spare his wife and unborn baby. They survived. He died. Many of our military are gamers...and they play violent games. My sons are gamers. They all have jobs, are gentlemen, and help others in need. They never got into drugs, drinking or trouble and they´ve been playing for years. Halo, Call of Duty, Black Ops, Assassin´s Creed...all violent, first-person shooter games. Even I learned to play them so I could be in their gaming world with them (which tickled my boys to death. They thought it was cool to have a mom to play a zombie match with). The lines I drew for them were no sex and no cursing.
If homicidal tendencies could be linked to gaming...then why don´t we hear about terrorists playing violent video games? What about internet porn? That´s a much more likely connection. These psychopaths are, after all, isolated young men.
Again...I understand the need to find a solution, but the solution is to eradicate evil. Please don´t give the government the go-ahead to try that one. God will take care of it when the time comes.
Increase in population might have a lot to do with it also. People live like rats in some places. My father tells of riding the bus to school in his youth carrying his shotgun to hunt with after school.
Young people today have no conflict resolution skills. Anything resembling conflict of any kind is quickly handled, (usually poorly), and there are few teachable moments for them to learn from. It is no wonder they have little chance of resolving problems within themselves ar with others.
The educational system calling for medicating of mostly boys is also a big problem in my mind. Some children do actually need meds to function in school, but many are put on drugs for classroom management reasons.
It would probably be better to think in terms of risk factors rather than simple causation. There is no reason there cannot be more than one risk factor for spree murders - which, according to experts and statistics, are not really on the rise on a per event basis. (I am not sure about the number of fatalities per event, however).
The vast majority of smokers do NOT develop lung cancer - but it is conclusively established that smoking is a huge risk factor for developing lung cancer. The vast majority of drunk drivers do not cause accidents and injure or kill people - but drunk driving is a major risk factor for such things. Countless additional examples might be cited.
Thus, that the vast majority of violent video game players, mentally ill persons, and consumers of violent entertainment do not go on killing rampages by no means eliminates such things as risk factors. The same can be said of those who own or have access to firearms. It may be that massacres like the one at Sandy Hook involve a "perfect storm" of known and possibly unknown risk factors best understood, if understandable at all, by something like chaos theory.
The level of risk a society is prepared to accept is a political matter, as the example of annual automobile fatalities shows. And the approach to auto fatalities involves reducing risk rather than eliminating automobiles.
World War II in Britain. Children grew up in London and other cities surrounded by the carnage and destruction of the war. Their house might have survived a bomb but the rest of the street was obliterated, close friends vaporized in a second. Incendiary bombs were used too, infernos consuming huge office buildings, department stores, factories, the docks, neighborhoods.
Bombers were shot out of the sky and fell in huge explosions, fighter planes duelling in the air, kids rooting for the ones with the red, white and blue rondels on their wings.
Many children were sent to the countryside and even Canada for survival. Often, they became orphans as parents died in the Blitz.
Men and women, military or not, were crippled and scarred, often more horribly than you can imagine. Kids grew up with those sights. I know, I was one of them. It was normal to play in a fire-bombed shell of a building or a huge crater. After the war the debris might have been cleared from bomb sites but there was always the twinkling evidence--glass sparkling like diamond dust in the sun.
Did the generation witnessing such dreadful sights grow up to be violent? No. Perhaps a very small percentage did, but I have to guess they would have been violent anyway. So why would video games cause people to be violent? I have to think it´s some other cause(s) and a big part of the whole could very well be the "everybody in class gets a gold star" mindset. Kids as victims of "society." We need more conservative psychologists!
That incredibly realistic life-like violence in the entertainment media, including what are called first person shooter video games, multiplayer games like World of Warcraft and many others are a significant risk factor for spree killings can in fact neither be proved nor disproved conclusively. What is certain is that spree killings by young males, like the violent entertainment that is pervasive today, are a relatively recent phenomenon. Perhaps only those who can personally compare the entertainment milieu of half a century ago with that of today, or those who have themselves seen and played shooter video games are likely to be persuaded of a connection.
The Lone Ranger, we might remember, always shot his silver bullets at the malefactor´s weapon, knocking it out of his hand without, one assumes, seriously wounding him. Popular Western movies and TV shows never, ever displayed the graphic and gruesome violence that is routine today. When people were shot shot, they just fell down. No blood, no splatter, no mess. And it was always perfectly clear who the good guys and the bad guys were. The good guys only shot in self-defense, and those they shot always deserved shooting. There was a moral to the story. The moral was always the same: good triumphs over evil. Marshal Dillon opened every episode of Gunsmoke by shooting, or shooting at someone. Ditto for The Rifleman, Lucas McCain. All the rest followed the same pattern. Violence was downplayed and always a last resort. These shows were highly moralistic, not nihilistic like much modern mass entertainment.
If you really truly think this way, how about you NOT let your kids play the bloody, nasty games or watch the violent, graphic movies?? Gee, now there is a thought. Just because you need a night off and junior seems perfectly happy blowing make believe people to bits or watching people dismembered via Netflix, maybe just maybe YOU should take responsibility you signed up for when you had that baby. Our 11 yo son has never played one of these games, never watched one of those movies, doesn´t have a cell phone, doesn´t listen to crap music, and doesn´t behave like a little wild hoodlum. We just DON´T LET HIM. So don´t tell me it is not possible.
As it is, we do this not to prevent him from becoming a mass murderer but to keep his childhood pure and intact as long as we can manage. Children are forced by our twisted culture to grow up far to fast because mommy and daddy just can´t be bothered to do the hard work of parenting and shift the responsibility over to electronic devices and public media.
...And then there is the popular, ´music,´ de jeur, filled withdisrespect, brutality, violence and rebellion. The tainted toon venue is more prevalant in most youth´s world than any other influence!
The fact is today´s PC world of LIEberalISM, (which currently dominates the statist´s media!), increasingly ´´tolerates,´´ and even urges the irresponsible, the unaccountable, the negative, -even evil, influences throughout the USA and beyond, through every venue imaginable while, at the same time, targeting people of faith, ethical principles and good will, for scorn. Such lefty/lib, ´´Political Correctness,´´ holds the public microphone in 2012 and is polluting American society every-which-way.
Come on, it is time to be honest. Violence in itself (war movies, cowboys, crime/drama) will not send people over the edge. But we are bombarded by the most grotesque, depraved, perverted, sick and twisted kind of gore with disturbing psychological aspects (slicing off of skin, chopping body parts and eating them, ritual dismemberment, bloody rape, etc.) than gives the hardest person continuous nightmares nowadays. This is stuff that makes Tarantino movies look like they are G-rated Disney films from the 50´s!! That kind of horrific stuff is what is sending unstable minds over the edge. Plus it desensitizes the rest of us. Add that to the fact that God is now mocked, we live in an anything-goes selfish society with NO moral compass where pornography and perversion are celebrated as well as the thug culture. And heroes now are people you wouldn´t want picking up garbage in a prison. Now tell me again Leiberman is wrong?? We need standards again. I don´t want to infringe on free speech, but there are ways to clean up this mess without making more laws.
The army had a problem. They can send someone through boot camp training but so many of the soldiars just could not aim a gun at another human being and actualy kill them when the time came. Morality and ethics would cause them to hesitate. The army now uses a behavior modification technique called desensitization. Soldiars in training are given non-lethal ammunition to shoot eachother with in training exercises. It´s a game, like paintball, no consequence, no moral dilema. Repetition reinforces the behaviour change. Blink the light, the dog salivates. It is not a theory, it is accepted scientific principle. It is "scientific concensus".
Hollywood, violent games makers and rap music are creating societal risks greater than the threat that the tobacco industry was super taxed, cluster class action suit and demonized for. Change the narrative the liberals want to use, make the liberals live up to their own rules. Make the liberals demonize and economicaly crush their hollywood propoganda arm. Make obama punish the rap music hate mongers. It won´t be hard, progressives happily eat their own.
Majority Leader Harry Reid says the Senate will not extend current farm law if Congress can´t agree on a new farm bill before adjourning next week. House leaders have reserved space on their agenda this week for extending the current law until the end of January. Lawmakers fear that milk prices might rise sharply if dairy subsidies expire Jan. 1. The House and Senate have passed separate versions, but with widespread differences over crop subsidies and how much to cut food stamps. House Speaker John Boehner said last week that the House should extend the current law while negotiators seek
WASHINGTON — Majority Democrats in the Senate won approval Tuesday for one of President Barack Obama´s key judicial nominees, the first of his picks to win confirmation since they weakened the chamber´s filibuster rules. Senators voted 56-38 to approve Washington lawyer Patricia Millett to join the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, the nation´s second most powerful court. Both sides saw Millett´s appointment as pivotal. It will give Democratic-appointed judges a 5-4 majority over those chosen by Republican presidents for that court, which rules on the legality of White House actions and federal agency regulations. Obama praised
In response to Dylan Byers: MSNBC Is Everything the Left Accuses Fox News of Being: The Byers criticism of MSNBC was interesting and significant because it exists at all, but he´s still praising them with faint damn. He goes out of his way to drag Fox down to their level over and over again; he´s willing to concede that MSNBC might be as bad as Fox, when to any objective observer, there is simply no comparison. MSNBC is a gutter-dwelling performance-art interpretation of a shrieking-loon far left website, not a news channel with a high percentage of left-leaning opinion.
Environmental Protection Agency employees received light punishments for “employee integrity” violations and avoided prosecution when crimes allegedly occurred, according to the agency’s inspector general. The IG revealed a list of employee integrity violations that included assault, illegal possession of a weapon, and efforts to solicit improper personal payments from agency contractors, among other violations. Many received light punishments for the offenses, including ethics counseling, short leaves of absence, and informal discussions with supervisors. One employee was sentenced to 18 months of probation for attempting to carry a knife, stashed in one of his shoes, onto a plane. Despite the criminal prosecution, the
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is spending an additional $55 million to “bolster” the healthcare workforce, as Obamacare contributes to shortages in the industry. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced last week that her agency will provide over 270 grants “from diversity to dentistry” to address worker shortages in the healthcare industry. The funding includes $45.4 million to support the nursing workforce, $5.2 million of which will go towards “improving nursing diversity.” The grants also provide $2.4 million for training of doctoral-level psychologists to “address the behavioral health needs of vulnerable and underserved populations,” and $3 million to support
Office Depot said Tuesday it has chosen Boca Raton, Fla. for its new headquarters over Naperville. Office Depot completed its merger with Naperville-based OfficeMax last month, but the pair hadn´t yet announced where the combined company would be based. The companies asked for tax breaks from both states. Illinois lawmakers adjourned last week before making a decision. Last month, the company named Roland Smith, the former head of the U.S. unit of supermarkets operator Delhaize Group, as its new CEO, hoping to tap into his turnaround and integration background. The company said the evaluation of its headquarters selection was based
The most influential think tank in Washington is getting a new address: 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Metaphorically speaking, of course. But The Center for American Progress has so many contributors, fellows, and staffers who already work there they may as well make it offical and change the address on their business cards. This is especially true now that the founder and chairman of the board of CAP, John Podesta, is going to work for Obama. New York Times: President Obama, after a rocky year that leaves him at the lowest ebb of his presidency, is bringing into his White House circle the longtime
WASHINGTON- Democratic Representative Mel Watt´s nomination to lead the agency that regulates taxpayer-owned mortgage financiers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac cleared a procedural hurdle in the U.S. Senate, putting it on course for final approval likely later on Tuesday. President Barack Obama nominated Watt in May to head the Federal Housing Finance Agency, but Republicans had blocked a final vote. Last month, however, Senate Democrats changed the rules to allow nominees like Watt to overcome filibusters with a simple majority in the 100-seat chamber. Previously, it took 60 votes.
The generous mystery tipper who has been leaving waiters and waitresses across the country thousands of dollars in "Tips for Jesus" — and stamped with the @tipsforjesus handle — was identified by a New York City waiter as Jack Selby, former PayPal vice president. Aruj Dhawan, a waiter at Bo´s Kitchen, told the New York Post that Selby and two other patrons gave him a $1,000 tip on a $111.05 bill. "As I was about to drop the check off, one of the men said they would ‘make my night.’ They called me over, gave me the check," Dhawan told
General Motors GM -0.22% CEO Dan Akerson and the GM board have selected product chief Mary Barra to succeed him, the company said today, and Akerson is retiring in January. The move will make 33-year GM veteran Barra the first woman to lead a global automaker. Arguably, it will make her the highest-profile female CEO in the world. It also set in motion a cascade of other management changes in the biggest re-set of the automaker’s leadership since the 2009 U.S.-government bailout. But all the moves were internal. Akerson accelerated the timing of his exit by several months because of
Democrats have blamed much of the gridlock on Capitol Hill on a number of GOP extremists who won’t accept legislation that is not perfect in their minds. Asked by Kenneth G. Langone, the co-founder of Home Depot, whether there are any extremists in the Democratic ranks, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer said no. “I don’t think there are any extremists in my party,” the Maryland Democrat said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” Mr. Langone expressed disbelief at the comment. “What more can I say,” he said. “The other guys are the bad guys, you are the good guys.” Mr. Hoyer said
“Netflix is casting its vote for Mitt Romney,” quipped The Hollywood Reporter. The video streaming service has acquired a Greg Whiteley documentary titled “Mitt” that will debut January 24. The behind-the-scenes documentary on Romney’s campaigns for president from 2006 to 2012 with a “surprising level of access” to the candidate will premiere at the Sundance Film Festival on January 17. Lisa Nishimura, Netflix vice president of original documentary and comedy, declared "This rare inside look at Mitt Romney and his family as he runs for president showcases a unique kind of storytelling, one which takes the viewer well beyond the
On his way to the podium at the memorial ceremony for former South African president Nelson Mandela, President Obama walked down the line of dignitaries, greeting other leaders there to pay their respects. Among the hands shaken: that of Cuban leader Raul Castro. Obama neither made a special effort to shake Castro’s hand nor to avoid him. A snub might have been awkward: In his speech, Obama praised Mandela’s “greatest gift” as “his recognition that we are all bound together in ways that can be invisible to the eye; that there is a oneness to humanity; that we achieve ourselves by
The Obama State Department has finally released a second round of photos revealing the harrowing devastation wrought by a terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012. The new photographs depict rampant damage to the consulate. They show charred walls, smoldering fires, Arabic graffiti defacing exterior walls, and scattered debris throughout. The extent of the damage would lead any reasonably serious person to conclude that this was a cold, calculated attack, carefully coordinated to mark the 11th anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001. Unfortunately for the American people, the Obama-Clinton-Rice cabal that led to the Benghazi cover-up was
A “presidential selfie” featuring President Barack Obama, British Prime Minister David Cameron, and Denmark’s Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt at Nelson Mandela’s memorial service began making the rounds this morning, but it’s the person not included in the frame who caught everyone’s attention: As anyone with two eyes and a Twitter account has noticed, Michelle Obama does not appear amused. Of course, though a picture says a thousand words, not all of those words are necessarily true. FLOTUS might not have even known the photo was taking place. Or she could disapprove of funeral selfies. Either way.
A black fashion student says he was brutally attacked by a gang of Hasidic men who shouted anti-gay slurs at him while he was walking through Williamsburg after a night of partying, the Daily News has learned. Taj Patterson, 22, was headed home to Fort Greene around 4:30 a.m. on Dec. 1 when he says more than a dozen ultra-Orthodox Jewish men began assaulting him on Flushing Ave. and yelling, “Stay down, f----t!”
Just how much do many Hollywood liberals hate conservatives? In an interview with Playboy, Ben Affleck said, "When I watch a guy [on film] I know is a big Republican, part of me thinks, I probably wouldn’t like this person if I met him": PLAYBOY: You developed a political profile campaigning for presidential candidates Al Gore, John Kerry and Barack Obama. How did that come about? AFFLECK: I grew up in a house with a mother who was a teacher and a Freedom Rider—very left-wing Democrats living in a heterogeneous working-class neighborhood. I picked up a lot of those values there, and I
MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry opened her program over the weekend with a commentary about the Affordable Care Act’s colloquial moniker: “Obamacare.” She said that the word was originally created as a “derogatory term,” designed by white men as a way to delegitimize President Barack Obama and his achievement. However, she said that the term will soon be synonymous with all of Obama’s accomplishments and she urged her audience to use the term with pride. “I want to talk today about a controversial word. It’s a word that has been with us for years, and like it or not, it’s indelibly
President Obama, former president George W. Bush and their wives departed Washington Monday morning on Air Force One on their way to a memorial service in South Africa for Nelson Mandela. The president and first lady Michelle Obama are being accompanied by Mr. Bush, former first lady Laura Bush and former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on the flight to Johannesburg. A four-hour memorial service will be held on Tuesday for South Africa’s first black president. Mr. Mandela, the anti-apartheid revolutionary, died on Thursday at age 95. Former President Bill Clinton and daughter Chelsea are traveling separately to South Africa. Former President
President Obama will make remarks on Nelson Mandela´s legacy during a memorial service Tuesday for the late South African freedom fighter, officials said Monday. "We do expect President Obama to speak as part of the program," said Ben Rhodes, deputy national security adviser for strategic communications. The president and first lady Michelle Obama departed Monday for Johannesburg, where a Mandela memorial service will be held in a soccer stadium. Obama, who will also spend time with the Mandela family, is not scheduled to hold any bilateral meetings with foreign leaders while in South Africa, Rhodes said. Rhodes also said the
Barack Obama has arrived in South Africa to lead the American delegation at a memorial service for former South African President Nelson Mandela in Johannesburg. But his party is reportedly stuck in traffic and he is said to have arrived late at the stadium for the ceremony. [Snip] But Mr Clinton, Mr Carter and his wife Rosalynn have all traveled separately to the event. According to reports, Mr Obama and his delegation are stuck in a lines of traffic caused by tens of thousands of people making their way to the event. Mr Obama is among the foreign leaders who
All three networks on Monday morning highlighted the appearance of the Obamas at the Kennedy Center Honors, but only ABC fawned over "fashion win" of First Lady. Lara Spencer enthused that " one of the stars of the show was Michelle Obama." An excited Spencer explained that Mrs. Obama looked "absolutely ravishing in a flowing teal gown as she accompanied President Obama." The co-host declared, "Another big fashion win for the First Lady. CBS This Morning offered a full report on the various performers who were honored, but co-anchor Charlie Rose avoided ABC´s superlatives.
Former Secretary of State Colin Powell believes the United States should have a socialized, single-payer healthcare system similar to those in Canada and Europe. “I think universal health care is one of the things we should really be focused on, and I hope that will happen,” Powell reportedly said last week. “Whether it’s Obamacare, or son of Obamacare, I don’t care. As long as we get it done.” The Puget Sound Business Journal reported Powell´s remarks at the Prostate Cancer Survivors Celebration Breakfast at the University of Washington´s Cancer Research Center. Powell, the Republican who supported Barack Obama during the last two presidential
Say goodbye to the 60-watt incandescent bulb. This year manufacturers started phasing out 100w and 75w bulbs. On January 1 it will become illegal to import or manufacture traditional 60w and 40w bulbs too. Time to stock up? Not so fast. First, check out Cree’s energy-sipping new 75-watt replacement bulb. I used to be outraged over the federal government’s draconian moves to outlaw traditional lightbulbs. For 100 years we’ve lived and thrived under the warm glow of incandescent lightbulbs. Aside from the fact that 90% of the electricity used by the bulbs is radiated in the form of heat rather than