A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Costly Toll for Republicans Who
Voted for Gay Marriage

New York Times, by Thomas Kaplan

Original Article

Posted By:Oblio, 12/15/2012 7:22:49 AM

As four Republican state senators, one by one, agreed to break with their party and cast a politically risky vote to legalize same-sex marriage last year, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and gay-rights advocates vowed to do everything in their power to protect them against political retribution. State Senator Stephen M. Saland, one of four Republicans to vote to legalize same-sex marriage, conceded to his Democratic opponent on Thursday.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Keekng, 12/15/2012 7:30:59 AM     (No. 9066857)

It is not smart to kiss off your main constituency for any special interest group.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: buckeye1, 12/15/2012 7:32:39 AM     (No. 9066861)

It is especially costly when your political opponents (in both parties) will sharpen their knives to take you out at your next election.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: trapper, 12/15/2012 7:36:57 AM     (No. 9066869)

It continues to amaze me that the lessons of the 2010 elections were lost on so many Republicans. No sympahy for those who simply refuse to learn.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 12/15/2012 7:37:02 AM     (No. 9066870)

Such is the political cesspool that is New York.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: miceal, 12/15/2012 8:01:57 AM     (No. 9066902)

Such is the political cesspool known as the democrat party....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: WhamDBambam, 12/15/2012 8:14:57 AM     (No. 9066919)

"Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and gay-rights advocates vowed to do everything in their power to protect them against political retribution. State Senator Stephen M. Saland, one of four Republicans to vote to legalize same-sex marriage, conceded to his Democratic opponent on Thursday."

Suckers! Didn´t you learn anything from Lucy and the football?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: WimeTarmerFable, 12/15/2012 8:15:50 AM     (No. 9066922)

This will all soon be moot as the SCOTUS will make law this June and declare Same Sex Marriage the law of the land by Fiat with Johnny Roberts, Chief Judgie, leading the charge...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Nimby, 12/15/2012 8:20:40 AM     (No. 9066932)

And they believed the democrats!,

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: nevernaught, 12/15/2012 8:24:29 AM     (No. 9066937)

A survey in 2012 indicated that only 2% of the population is gay and only 75,000 gay marriages have been performed since allowed is several states. Their political voting power is actually less than liberals would have you believe. Of course, they do attract the democrat vote, but probably not enough to be significant. It is a wedge issue, and republican candidates shouldn´t be hasty in believing the exaggerated numbers.

To put this all in perspective, an average of 2.3 million marriages are performed in the US each year. I don´t know what this all means, except maybe the noisy wheel gets the grease.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Udanja99, 12/15/2012 8:35:50 AM     (No. 9066963)

Never ever ever ever trust a democrat.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Laurie, 12/15/2012 8:37:33 AM     (No. 9066968)

We conservatives give all these issues credibility by fighting about them. I don´t give a rip about Jack marrying John. It´s God´s job to sort out people´s choices, not mine.

If we claim to be a free country with our rights endowed by our Creator, this should be none of the government´s, or my, business. In fact, if we start treating each person as an individual for tax and "benefits" bestowed by the government none of this would matter to anyone.

I think we need to start ignoring government and all these divisive issues just like we ignore a child throwing a tantrum. Sooner or later they´ll just give up because no one´s paying attention to them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Crosscut, 12/15/2012 8:44:16 AM     (No. 9066978)

The country has bigger fish to fry than worrying about what homosexuals are doing with one another. Perhaps it´s time to move on and let this leftist diversion go.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: heartlandconservative, 12/15/2012 8:53:15 AM     (No. 9067004)

The cure for this type of garbage is easily available to each and everyone in this country. The problem is the vast majority of people, including those in the so called Patriot groups, refuse to take the cure. Until such time as Liberty lovers quit making excuses and seize control of the classrooms, city hall, the courts and last but not least State Legislatures, all your complaining is wasted bandwidth.
Remember this, DC is not a party to the Constitution, it is a creation of the Constitution, as such it has no say about what the Constitution means, it cannot Lawfully add to, take away from, or change the Lawfully delegated authority given to it. You delegate, it complies, that´s the TRUE LAW.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Jethro bo, 12/15/2012 8:59:38 AM     (No. 9067021)

These four RINOs have done more damage to New York than Sandy. Sandy´s damage can be repaired, destroying millenniums worth of human dignity in the sanctity of marriage can´t. Marriage isn´t a political institution. It is a procreation of the species successful strategy. But then again, homosexual copulation was never about the children, its about the hedonistic desires of adults.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: fritzilou, 12/15/2012 9:16:49 AM     (No. 9067059)

It is another issue that the Democrats exploit. The social coercion that the left wing media conducts puts such pressure on one´s psyche to socially conform. It takes great strength of principles to not conform.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: balogreene, 12/15/2012 9:30:36 AM     (No. 9067101)

What numbers 11 and 12 said. Who cares who marries whom, it is between them and God. Lets worry about budgets, national defense, and the Constitution and let God sort out the social issues individually.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: mitzi, 12/15/2012 9:43:16 AM     (No. 9067141)

They [gay rights advocates] helped provide financial support for the New York senators;

That´s what happens when you sell your soul to the highest bidder and ignore the wishes of your constituents.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Maybeth, 12/15/2012 9:44:28 AM     (No. 9067145)

Cuomo and Bloomberg vowed to protect them?
And they BELIEVED that?
Oooops.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: TexasRose, 12/15/2012 9:52:06 AM     (No. 9067172)

I must have read it wrong. I thought it said that 3 of the 4 Repubs who voted FOR "gay marriage" lost.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: PeoplesRepublikNY, 12/15/2012 10:10:16 AM     (No. 9067215)

Grisanti (who turned his party affiliation from D-Rat into a RINO) campaigned for election in 2010 saying he´d vote against same-sex marriage, flip-flopped on the eve of the vote. He won re-election in 2012 due to redistricting in his favor.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: jlw509, 12/15/2012 10:50:09 AM     (No. 9067303)

#11, #12, this issue is not, and never was, about what two males or two females could do together "in their own bedrooms." Every conservative person I know says "That´s a matter of privacy. I´ll keep out of yours, you keep out of mine."

The issue is that legal pseudogamy is no longer private, because it leads by a short, fast route to a huge tangle of public issues, most related to the financial subsidy, and the forcible suppression of normal, traditional, and ethical disagreement.

That´s not something from my paranoid imagination. It´s already happening in every venue that has legalized this unfortunate parody of marriage.

Our decayed public culture can´t even affirm a child´s right to a mom and a dad. Legal pseudogamy opens all the avenues to the cultural penetration of our children with this troubling, disordered sexual ideology.

It´s also a question of democracy: we don´t want this. We don´t have to have it.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 12/15/2012 11:19:03 AM     (No. 9067371)

This is not a kumbaya, love, and fairness thing, this is an issue about condoning a degenerate sin that destroys the moral and social fabric of a nation. God is not mocked.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: athina, 12/15/2012 11:20:06 AM     (No. 9067372)

It´s not an ´awkward side effect´ to have Democrats replace these republicans. We understood what we were doing and think the state deserves what they voted for. Cuomo and Bloomberg can ´lament´ all they want. They haven´t lost anything, politically; they´ve gained 3 seats in the senate and they get to marry homosexuals and force the rest of us to live with it.

I am leaving this state as soon as my last two children are out of high school, God willing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Fitzroy, 12/15/2012 11:22:08 AM     (No. 9067377)

A culture that can´t defend marriage can´t defend anything.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: beth, 12/15/2012 12:14:38 PM     (No. 9067476)

This is about religious freedom. Once these relationships receive the country´s seal of approval, religious organizations will be sued for not going along. It is for that reason that so many are fighting this. It is all about protecting the first amendment.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: NotaBene, 12/15/2012 12:36:38 PM     (No. 9067505)

The will keep on pushing forward. Soon it will be the right to have gay religious wedding in Catholic Churches. These will be eventually be closed down in the name of equality.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 12/15/2012 1:17:02 PM     (No. 9067588)

@#9: The Democrats eventually amke everyone a special interest group. They captured the black vote with welfare in 1965. They captured the gay vote with gay marriage, they captured the women`s vote with contraceptives and `women`s health issues` and they`re capturing the ignorant vote with free everything else. Meanwhile, the hapless GOP continue to twiddle their thumbs, tug on Superman`s cape and spit into the wind.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: tomishere, 12/15/2012 1:41:52 PM     (No. 9067665)

#14 has it right about social conservatives helping to elect socialist candidates, never worrying about the consequences. this is the problem with one issue voters, their emotionally driven much like children, cut off their nose to spite there face. I´m not trying to disparage people private views, but the demand the republican party be the anti sexual party goes against take government off my backs. The exception to this is pro life, as it´s really a life and death issue.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Marzon, 12/15/2012 1:45:46 PM     (No. 9067676)

Another NYT article hyping the stereotype that Republican voters are all a bunch of homophobic bigots. In other news the sun is expected to rise in the east tomorrow.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: NYbob, 12/15/2012 2:23:36 PM     (No. 9067750)

Who cares, right? Well make way for ´close´ inner family marriages, polygamy and bestiality. Oh that´s crazy. Over the top. Could never happen. Gee, this sham ´marriage´ thing is OK, because they are harmless and again, who cares? Well I just read an article about some of our new immigrants from the militant Arab world. They have a tendency to marry first cousins and the resulting genetic defects are just part of that deal. Anyone want to guess if they will be ordered to stop that? If first cousins aren´t a big deal what about within the immediate biological family. Advocates like Singer and others are serious about arguing FOR it. The group marriage crowd already has a media presence, so accept them! I´m not ruling anything else out because we are in a world where anything and everything is justified and if you object, YOU are the problem.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Trigger2, 12/16/2012 5:07:00 AM     (No. 9068596)

Stupid Republicans. They never learn that to go against their base, they end up the loser. Good riddance. Boehner, you listening?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 715693




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"



The Secrets of Princeton
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Piercing the secrecy of
offshore tax havens
Washington Post, by Scott Higham, Michael Hudson*    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 7:06:15 AM     Post Reply
A New York hedge fund manager allegedly swindles $12 million from a prominent Baltimore family. An Indiana couple is accused of bilking hundreds of customers by charging for free trials of cosmetic products. A financial manager in Texas promises 23-percent returns but absconds with $33.5 million of his investors’ money in a classic Ponzi scheme.All three cases have one thing in common: money that ended up in offshore accounts and trusts set up in tax havens around the world.

Former News Corp President
Chernin bids $500 million for Hulu
Reuters, by Ronald Grover and Jennifer Saba    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:49:03 AM     Post Reply
Former News Corp president Peter Chernin has bid around $500 million for Hulu, the online video streaming service he helped create in 2007, according to two sources with knowledge of Hulu´s sale process. The website, jointly controlled by News Corp and Walt Disney Co, reached out to potential buyers in March after initially contemplating a deal in which one would buy out the other. It is not clear whether that transaction is still being contemplated.

After Pentagon investigations, three
Army generals censured for misconduct
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:08:11 AM     Post Reply
After lengthy investigations, the Pentagon has determined that three Army generals committed misconduct in separate incidents, adding to an unusually long list of senior military commanders who have been censured over the past year.On Friday, defense officials confirmed that Army Maj. Gen. Ralph O. Baker, the commander of a strategic counterterrorism force on the Horn of Africa, was fired March 28 on charges of sexual misconduct. Two officials familiar with the case said Baker was investigated for allegedly groping a female civilian employee after he had been drinking.

Diplomacy downplay: Obama administration
minimizes latest North Korean nuke threat
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor and Shaun Waterman    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 7:02:06 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration appeared eager Thursday to downplay the North Korean military’s latest threat that it has the final authority to carry out “cutting-edge, smaller, lighter and diversified” nuclear strikes on the United States.“This is just the latest in a long line of aggressive statements,” (Snip)the recent tension between Washington and Pyongyang “does not need to get hotter.”The remarks were the first public reaction from the Obama administration since Wednesday’s claim by the North Korean military that the “moment of explosion is approaching fast” with the possibility of war breaking out “today or tomorrow.”

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Charles Murray´s Gay-Marriage Surprise
New Yorker, by Jane Mayer    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/17/2013 5:00:38 PM     Post Reply
Political scientist Charles Murray has never backed away from controversy, but usually his opponents have been liberals. Friday, however, he managed to upset conservatives at the annual conference known as CPAC, where thousands of bewildered Republicans gathered to figure out the way forward after their party’s 2012 electoral defeat. Murray ditched his prepared remarks on “America Coming Apart” in favor of an impromptu admonition to fellow conservatives to accept the legalization of both gay marriage and abortion.

With a Speech, Cardinal
Set Path to Papacy
Wall Street Journal, by Stacy Meichtry    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/16/2013 7:48:58 AM     Post Reply
VATICAN CITY—It took Jorge Mario Bergoglio four minutes to convince fellow cardinals he was their leader. Speaking in the Paul VI grand hall of the Vatican, the Argentine cardinal warned the Catholic Church against focusing too much on matters close to home—advice that came against the backdrop of a papacy that had been consumed by infighting among Vatican officials, a dwindling flock in Europe and secular trends in the West. The 76-year-old Father Jorge, as he is known back home, said Roman Catholicism needed to shift its focus outward, to the world beyond Rome—rather than being "self-referential," he said.

Obama in Jerusalem
New York Sun, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/16/2013 7:43:15 AM     Post Reply
When President Obama gets to Jerusalem next week, one of the signals to listen for is an indication of what country he thinks he’s in. Normally this is clear when the President — any president — goes to the capital of a foreign country. He’s in whatever country the capital is capital of. But Mr. Obama has been refusing to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Not only that, but he has been refusing to admit that Jerusalem is even in Israel.

President Obama bombs in
comments about a nuclear Iran
New York Daily News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/16/2013 7:28:35 AM     Post Reply
Approaching his first presidential trip to Israel, President Obama offered a fresh and foolish — if not feckless — assessment of the Iranian nuclear threat. "Right now, we think it would take over a year or so for Iran to actually deliver a nuclear weapon, but obviously we don’t want to cut it too close,” the President told an Israeli television interviewer, in the process cutting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu off at the knees and giving the mullahs breathing room to keep enriching uranium.

What Rand Paul got right
Los Angeles Times, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/12/2013 7:28:03 AM     Post Reply
I hope I´m not too late to the fight.Last week, freshman Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) held an old-fashioned filibuster against the nomination of John Brennan to head the CIA. Paul´s stated reason for taking to the floor and talking for 13 hours was that the Obama administration wouldn´t give him a straight answer on the question of whether the president can unilaterally order the killing of American citizens on American soil with "lethal force, such as a drone strike … and without trial."

No, 80 Percent of NYC High School
Graduates Are Not Illiterate
New York Magazine, by Adam Martin    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/9/2013 1:10:10 PM     Post Reply
An unfortunate story on CBS New York Thursday carried this headline: "Officials: 80 Percent Of Recent NYC High School Graduates Cannot Read." It´s a shocker, but it´s also untrue. And to make things worse, the story that followed was riddled with typos. According to the New York Post, which reported the same story earlier on Thursday, "79.3 percent of city public-school grads who went to CUNY’s six two-year colleges arrived without having mastered the basics" of reading, writing, and math, and had to take non-credit remedial classes to catch up.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

54 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

46 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Megyn Kelly and the
Sandberg Head Shaker

38 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Richard F. Miniter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:16:05 AM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly’s "Kelly File" is a great news show. She’s incisive, informed and customarily handles the toughest guest with aplomb. But her lengthy interview of Facebook C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg about her second book in the Lean In series Lean In: For Graduates was a head shaker. Amazing that she of all people allowed Sandberg to restring the same old, same old, shamed, and shopworn feminist myths about women and girls and then jangle it in front of her viewing audience like something new out of the box. Indeed Kelly all but genuflected in front of this woman. Kept her on thru

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

34 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

White is not right: Campus admins ask
for help weeding out white people

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 7:47:18 PM     Post Reply
Western Washington University sent a questionnaire to students asking them for advice on how the administration could succeed at making sure that in future years, “we are not as white as we are today.” The question notes that WWU’s racial make up does not perfectly reflect the nation at large, and asks students to consider strategies that other universities have used to focus on skin color as the paramount indicator of a student-applicant’s worth. The president of WWU has stated that his explicit goal is to reduce the white population on campus, according to Campus Reform. “I’ve said before and I’ll say it

Atlanta Braves flooded with Hank
Aaron hate mail: He’s a ‘s*****g’

30 replie(s)
Washington Times (D.C.), by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/15/2014 3:23:19 PM     Post Reply
Hank Aaron’s recent comments about the need for America to realize that racism is still very much alive and thriving — only now due to those who wear “neckties and starched shirts” rather than KKK hoods — has sparked an angry backlash and many fans are turning the tables, calling the baseball legend himself a racist. “Hank Aaron is a s*****g piece of [expletive] [racial slur],” one man said in an email to the Atlanta Braves’ front office, one of the teams Mr. Aaron used to play for, CBS News reported. “My old man instilled in my mind from a

If a nuclear bomb exploded in downtown
Washington, what should you do?

29 replie(s)
The Week, by Marc Ambinder    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/15/2014 4:51:46 AM     Post Reply
Funny question in the headline, yes? But since President Obama worries more about the threat of terrorists´ improvised nuclear device going off in a major American city than anything Russia can throw at us, I was wondering if the government had deigned to share with us citizens any tips for, you know, surviving something their own intelligence points to as the likeliest unlikely Black Swan event. Well, no. And yes. No — very few people in Washington, D.C., who work for the government have any idea what they would do if a 10-kiloton nuclear device exploded at the intersection of 16th and K

Obama taps gay bishop to wrap Easter
Prayer Breakfast with invocation

29 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 4/15/2014 9:25:28 AM     Post Reply
When President Obama needed a preacher to fulfill the closing prayer duties at the annual White House Easter Prayer Breakfast, he turned to none other than the Episcopal Church’s first openly gay bishop — who said he was as shocked as anyone at the appointment. The Right Rev. Gene Robinson said in a tweet, accompanied by a photo of Mr. Obama behind a podium at the event: “POTUS ‘preaches’ at the Easter prayer breakfast. Then, out of the blue, asks ME to close with prayer. OMG!” Newsmax said he also emphasized that the words he chose to close the breakfast

White babies just 15 months old show racial
bias when picking playmates, study found

29 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/15/2014 10:23:35 PM     Post Reply
Toddlers show racial bias when picking playmates, a study reveals. They also take account of how fairly others behave. Researchers tested the reaction of white 15-month-olds as toys were distributed. Two white adults divided the toys, one equally and the other unequally. Seventy per cent of the toddlers chose to play with the researcher who distributed the toys fairly. But in a second test, when one researcher favoured a white recipient over an Asian one, they picked the ‘fair’ researcher less often, the journal Frontiers in Psychology reports. And the babies are more likely to help those who share the same ethnicity, which is known as

Obama Selects First Openly Gay
Episcopal Bishop to Lead Easter Prayer

27 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Andrew Kirell    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 12:46:05 PM     Post Reply
President Obama pulled a surprise move Monday at the White House’s Easter Prayer Breakfast when he selected Gene Robinson to lead the closing prayer. Robinson is famously known as the first openly gay Episcopal bishop. Talking Points Memo’s Tom Kludt spotted the following tweet from Robinson, who was in attendance: (Tweet) Robinson, 66, became diocesan bishop of New Hampshire in March 2004. He retired in January 2013 and is currently a senior fellow at the progressive


Post Reply   Close thread 715693





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS