A Message From Lucianne
 Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy
|
|
RNC May Try to Limit
Number, Format of GOP
Debates in 2016
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 12/12/2012 2:36:51 PM
|
| Over on the home page, I have an interview with Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, mostly discussing the RNC”s new Growth and Opportunity Project, which is led by a five-member panel that will review their operations and strategies and those of the Republican party as a whole. Perhaps most intriguing and newsworthy was Priebus’s comment about an effort to limit the number of GOP presidential-primary debates and the format in 2016. GERAGHTY: One of the intriguing points I saw raised in the discussions that this group has had is the recommendation of
|
Comments:
The last paragraph of the article mentions in passing the leftist moderators. They need to grow a spine and refuse to allow only radical leftists to moderate these debates. I´m not holding my breath.
|
 
Reply 1 - Posted by:
ebuilder, 12/12/2012 2:39:24 PM (No. 9061946)
The real story is they are at work trying to rule out 3rd parties.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
privateer, 12/12/2012 2:42:38 PM (No. 9061951)
RNC´s Master Ostlers thinking about maybe closing the barn door. It won´t matter how many debates, where they´re held, nor even who participates. Debates 2016!...This Time it´s Potemkin! I won´t be watching, even if they do hold them. Autocrats don´t debate.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
absalom, 12/12/2012 2:47:18 PM (No. 9061959)
The headline, and from a friendly source, says volumes. Why is the GOP engaged in the debate fandango at all, since its rigged against them? Good reason they´re called the stupid party.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
zzzghy, 12/12/2012 2:47:38 PM (No. 9061960)
The RNC will be hopelessly lost in the taillights by 2016 if they don´t have some sort of legit come-to-Jesus moment, and that´s doubtful.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 12/12/2012 2:53:17 PM (No. 9061966)
No,no,no. Wrong.
Flood the airwaves with open,honest ´debate-forums´ where the genius and importance of conservative principles are both discussed and explained. Use the primary season as a tool for winning the greater election. Bring in the Trey Gowdies and the Marco Rubios and all the new and talented practitioners of liberty.
We have the better case.
The opposition must resort to trickery.
We can and must tell the simple truth about conservatism in every forum and as often as possible.
Hiding in the corner is not the answer.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
texsupreme, 12/12/2012 2:53:28 PM (No. 9061967)
Just say no!
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
voxpopuli, 12/12/2012 2:56:44 PM (No. 9061972)
have all they want..
as long as they are moderated by Hannity or Rush..
get some practice ones in for the 2014 elections..
they can use empty chairs when the communists refuse a REAL debate..
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Gallo3, 12/12/2012 3:11:59 PM (No. 9061997)
How about they play Trivia instead of debate?
Then everyone will be able to see just how stupid all Democrats are.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
crimea river, 12/12/2012 3:12:21 PM (No. 9061998)
Perhaps the RNC will contemplate a stipulation that no former Democratic lawmakers’ staffers may moderate one of the debates.
To even have to make this request shows how out of touch the RNC is. Mark Steyn, Dinesh D´Souza, Laura Ingraham, Brit Hume and Tammy Bruce should all be high on the list of moderators.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
MisterDickens, 12/12/2012 3:14:39 PM (No. 9062002)
I´m trying to remember any conservative journalists, if there are any, moderating any democrat debates. Not in 2012 because they didn´t have any, but anytime ever before that.
Why would Republicans ever have debates moderated by democrats? You don´t let democrats up on the stage to debate, except McCain, so why let them ask the questions?
If a little snit like Steffie wants to hold a debate among Pubs, just don´t go.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
AnnG, 12/12/2012 3:16:19 PM (No. 9062004)
I would like to see less debates. There were way too many debates last time and suffered from debate fatigue. I do agree that the next debates need to be moderated by conservatives only.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
LanieLou, 12/12/2012 3:30:42 PM (No. 9062024)
Now that the old guard GOP progressives have dumped our Tea Partiers from committees, they´re afraid we may form a new party.
The Heritage Party? Formed by DeMint? I can only wish at this point.... and pray he does.
Also, after Candy´s trick last debate... No MSM miscreants should moderate... Just put an issue on a screen, and let each candidate state their position. period.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
schnapps, 12/12/2012 3:34:43 PM (No. 9062029)
Add Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity and Walter Williams to the debate moderator short-list.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 12/12/2012 3:52:58 PM (No. 9062061)
Aren´t there already too few of us? How would dividing ourselves up into two parties help us win an election? Until you can explain that, don´t start a thirt party.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
snapper451, 12/12/2012 3:55:02 PM (No. 9062064)
Actually why waste your time, Newt has already conceded to Hillary. Unless we defeat the MSM no one will be able to beat her since they have already crowned her, ask the governor of NY who they are chiding for not endorsing her yet.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
frenesi1, 12/12/2012 3:56:21 PM (No. 9062069)
Tammy Bruce....wow, she would be great.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
ok state mom, 12/12/2012 4:03:46 PM (No. 9062079)
Put a stop to cross-over party affiliated voters. That is what got us McCain. Negotiate knowing the dems are so much "smarter" than the republicans in getting what they want.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Coy860, 12/12/2012 4:12:48 PM (No. 9062091)
May Try ??? ..oh please, may I?
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
msjena, 12/12/2012 4:18:16 PM (No. 9062101)
Certainly, for the primary debates, they can have whoever they want moderate the debates. Why do they let liberals do it? Have Bret Baier and other from Fox do it.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
steveW, 12/12/2012 4:24:24 PM (No. 9062115)
The Enemedia - moderators of choice for the primary debates. The Enemedia - moderators of choice for the presidential debates.
Kind of tells you all you need to know about the current state of the GOP.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
reilly, 12/12/2012 5:02:25 PM (No. 9062175)
Nice work on those 2012 debates and moderators. Find some conservative adult next time.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Dixie, 12/12/2012 5:07:01 PM (No. 9062182)
Why did the Republicans accept such pro-Left moderators?
They have to face this and decide to fix it, because if they don´t, they will lose to the Tea Party candidate....who won´t need debates.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
happywarrior, 12/12/2012 5:56:17 PM (No. 9062251)
Haha, "may". The lefty moderators "will" be even more extreme in 2016. No one stopped them this year and it worked. The GOP won´t grow nads by then, no way no how!
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Wendybird, 12/12/2012 6:19:27 PM (No. 9062280)
Why make such a radical change? If we keep the same type of policy makers, they will study the question for several more election cycles.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
cincinnati whig, 12/12/2012 7:22:13 PM (No. 9062341)
Rick Santorum would have beat Obama by a landslide. Thanks, Newt!
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
OperaBuff, 12/12/2012 7:41:40 PM (No. 9062367)
In other words, the RNC may try to limit the number and format of political ambushes by the DNC in 2016. Deciding to maybe try - hey, that takes some guts!
Hey RNC, why not send out some more fundraising letters so you can give yourselves a raise? All that "maybe try" stuff is harrowing work.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Common Core GED textbook: "9/11
hijackers were poor Afghanis"
|
|
Washington Times, by Oleg Atbashian
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/11/2013 1:55:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON ? Adult basic education and GED programs, with about 800,000 students taking GED tests each year, serve a segment of society that escaped government schools, including many homeschoolers. But the national propaganda effort called the Common Core Curriculum is spreading its tentacles to them. While many may not take the GED seriously, calling it the “Good Enough Diploma,” consider that quite a few homeschoolers take GED tests as a way to cancel out high school attendance requirements and lessen the record-keeping burden on home educators caused by compulsory attendance laws in every state. 2014 GED
|
Newseum Honors Hamas
Terrorists Alongside Daniel Pearl
|
|
FrontPage Magazine, by Daniel Greenfield
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/11/2013 1:34:57 PM
Post Reply
|
|
You may be wondering what the Newseum is; besides a really stupid portmanteau with a suspicious resemblance to Nauseam. The Newseum is three things. It’s big. It’s ugly. And it’s in D.C. With The New York Times–Ochs-Sulzberger Family Great Hall of News, the Bloomberg Internet, TV and Radio Gallery and the NBC News Interactive Newsroom… the Newseum exists to honor itself. It’s an example of the corporate media doing its own hagiography. It’s a Rock and Roll Hall of Fame for the teleprompter crowd. Despite costing nearly half-a-billion dollars, most people, who weren’t stuck in D.C. for four hours
|
What Did Obama Know and
When Did He Know It?
|
|
FrontPage Magazine, by Matthew Vadum
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/11/2013 12:57:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Congressional testimony this week showed the appalling lengths to which the Obama administration went to cover-up its mishandling of last fall’s terrorist attack at the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, but President Obama’s precise role in the cynical operation remains hidden. Americans still don’t know what President Obama knew and when he knew it. We don’t know what exactly he did when he learned on Sept. 11, 2012 that U.S. officials in Benghazi were under attack. Obama may have gone to bed while the attack was in progress, leaving
|
Former Nixon aide claims he
has evidence Lyndon B. Johnson
arranged John F. Kennedy´s
assassination in new book
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/11/2013 12:33:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Esteemed Republican strategist and lobbyist Roger Stone writes in his upcoming book that former president Lyndon B. Johnson set up John F. Kennedy’s assassination. Stone also writes that Richard Nixon and Johnson had a documented relationship with Jack Ruby, Lee Harvey Oswald’s killer, years before he shot Oswald in the basement of Dallas police headquarters in 1963. Stone, who worked for Richard Nixon’s Committee to Re-elect the President in 1972 and later served in the Nixon administration, writes that Johnson, a congressman at the time, instructed Richard Nixon, also a congressman at the time, to hire Ruby onto
|
Smoke forces evacuation
of White House press room
|
|
Fox News/Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/11/2013 12:21:10 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Reporters and photographers were evacuated briefly from the West Wing of the White House early Saturday because of smoke from an overheated transformer in a mechanical room. U.S. Secret Service spokesman Max Milien said that at about 7 a.m., smoke was seen coming from a mechanical room closet on the first floor. "Early this morning, an electrical transformer near the West Wing malfunctioned and set off a smoke alarm in the West Wing," a White House official said in a statement. "The transformer problem was quickly resolved. Electricity and personnel access to
|
Biometric Database of All Adult
Americans Hidden in Immigration Reform
|
|
Wired News, by David Kravets
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/11/2013 11:40:07 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The immigration reform measure the Senate began debating yesterday would create a national biometric database of virtually every adult in the U.S., in what privacy groups fear could be the first step to a ubiquitous national identification system. Buried in the more than 800 pages of the bipartisan legislation (.pdf) is language mandating the creation of the innocuously-named “photo tool,” a massive federal database administered by the Department of Homeland Security and containing names, ages, Social Security numbers and photographs of everyone in the country with a driver’s license or other state-issued photo ID.
|
|
Cruz crosses Schumer on border
|
|
Daily Caller, by Neil Munro
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/11/2013 11:30:25 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Texas Sen. Ted Cruz says the Senate’s immigration rewrite will fail because it rejects the popular bipartisan demand for tougher border security. “The American people want Congress to be serious on border security,” said Cruz, a Harvard-trained lawyer who has earned bitter complaints from progressives since his 2010 election. “That is true among Republicans and among Democrats, it is true in red states and blue states, that there is a bipartisan consensus [that] we need to get serious on securing the border,” he told Senators gathered
|
Sleeping With The Enemy: Media,
Politicos, Once Adversaries, Now
One Big Incestuous Circle
|
|
Mediaite, by Joe Concha
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/11/2013 11:22:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A long time ago in an America far, far away (some call it “the seventies”), there were only six channels to choose from on your television dial. So in terms of actually getting on the air at one of these stations, the competition was obviously fierce due to the limited options presented to aspiring anchors and reporters looking to break in. It basically went like this: Either someone had to die or embarrass themselves on the level of going streaking through the quad in order for a position to open up in the national news media.
|
|
Playing politics with tax records
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/11/2013 11:10:55 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A BEDROCK principle of U.S. democracy is that the coercive powers of government are never used for partisan purpose. The law is blind to political viewpoint, and so are its enforcers, most especially the FBI and the Internal Revenue Service. Any violation of this principle threatens the trust and the voluntary cooperation of citizens upon which this democracy depends. So it was appalling to learn Friday that the IRS had improperly targeted conservative groups for scrutiny. It was almost as disturbing that President Obama and Treasury Secretary Jack Lew have not personally apologized to the
|
Top Obama official’s brother is
president of CBS News, may drop
reporter over Benghazi coverage
|
|
Daily Caller, by Patrick Howley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/11/2013 10:59:05 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The brother of a top Obama administration official is also the president of CBS News, and the network may be days away from dropping one of its top investigative reporters for covering the administration’s scandals too aggressively. CBS News executives have reportedly expressed frustration with their own reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, who has steadily covered the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi terrorist attack in Libya since late last year. “Network sources” told Politico Wednesday that CBS executives feel Attkisson’s Benghazi coverage is bordering on advocacy,
|
Benghazi Whistleblower Attorney:
Congress Must Subpoena Hillary
Clinton to Testify Again
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/10/2013 10:05:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Earlier today, we learned about a bombshell report that said the CIA´s Benghazi talking points were changed 12 times, with extensive input from the State Department. It comes after State Department whistleblower Gregory Hicks testified Wednesday that he was shocked when he saw Susan Rice blaming a protest for the attack on numerous talk shows. Martha MacCallum discussed the next steps in the investigation of what happened in Benghazi with Hicks´ attorney, Victoria Toensing. At this point, she thinks "it´s about time" that House Republicans start issuing subpoenas,
|
Prince Harry Visits America, But
ABC Proclaims the Obamas to be
´Washington´s Royalty?´
|
|
NewsBusters, by Scott Whitlock
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/10/2013 9:57:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Britain´s Prince Harry arrived in Washington on Thursday, but ABC declared the Obamas to be "Washington´s royalty." On Friday´s Good Morning America, reporter Lama Hasan recounted the prince´s visit to the White House and an event with Michelle Obama. She hyped, "And then there was this: A clandestine visit with the First Lady that brought a little British glamour to Washington´s royalty. " The segment then cut to a clip of the First Lady. [See video below. MP3 audio here.] If the Obama´s are "Washington´s royalty," what does that make the Kennedys? On February 15, 2010, GMA´s George
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Obama´s Demeaning
Commencement Address
|
|
American Thinker, by Janice Shaw Crouse
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/10/2013 6:54:38 AM
Post Reply
|
|
As a presidential speech writer for the first Bush White House, I am always very interested in what presidents say in their formal speeches. They know, of course, that their remarks will be widely covered by the press, studied by analysts, and influential in contemporary political debates. For that reason, presidents rarely speak off-the-cuff, and their every word is carefully chosen for exactly the message the White House wants to convey to the public. Their graduation speeches, like all presidential addresses, go through many drafts and are reviewed by high-level administration officials
|
Earthquake: Did Carney
Presser End MSM Monolith?
|
|
PJ Media, by David Steinberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/10/2013 8:54:15 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The most notable takeaway from Jay Carney’s incomprehensible Friday appearance had little to do with his Klingon grammar. Carney does not represent the historical value of the event – you should be wise to forget his performance, and instead take note that he was flanked by the entire room, without exception. Do not underestimate the significance: the Obama administration has not faced such an onslaught of truth-seeking since he took office in 2008, and further, no Democratic administration has been charged from all sides like this in recent memory. That press conference was unthinkable just days ago
|
Carney Blames Romney for
Politicizing Benghazi
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Ben Shapiro
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/10/2013 9:49:16 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Friday, White House press secretary Jay Carney blamed Mitt Romney and Republicans for “politicizing” the Benghazi terrorist attacks. Harkening back to a Mitt Romney press conference on September 12, 2012, which addressed the Benghazi attacks only in passing while focusing instead on the assault on the American embassy in Cairo, Egypt, Carney suggested that Romney had tried to target the innocent Obama administration for telling the truth about Benghazi. “Republicans, again, in this ongoing effort that began in the hours after the attack when Mitt Romney put out a press release to try to take political
|
Latino student group says eating
tacos is offensive to Mexicans
|
|
Daily Caller [Washington DC], by Robby Soave
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/9/2013 6:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Northwestern University continued to stumble over diversity issues this week as Mexican students voiced disagreement with a campuswide letter that advised students not to celebrate Cinco de Mayo by engaging in racially-offensive activities, such as eating tacos and drinking tequila. The letter was sent to students via e-mail, and published in The Daily Northwestern last week. Leaders of Alianza, a Latino student group, and the Associated Student Government called on students to remember that Cinco de Mayo commemorates Mexico’s victory over France in the Battle of Puebla. It is not a day to throw a sombrero-themed party, they said.
|
Exclusive: Benghazi Talking
Points Underwent 12 Revisions,
Scrubbed of Terror Reference
|
|
ABC News, by Jonathan Karl
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/10/2013 6:54:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When it became clear last fall that the CIA’s now discredited Benghazi talking points were flawed, the White House said repeatedly the document were put together almost entirely by the intelligence community, but White House documents reviewed by Congress suggest a different story. ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they were extensive edited as they evolved from the drafts first written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before she appeared on five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.
|
White House hopes under fire
|
|
Boston Herald, by Joe Battenfeld
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/10/2013 5:37:55 AM
Post Reply
|
|
She weathered Whitewater. She made it past Monica ?Lewinsky. Now Hillary Clinton is hoping to beat the rap on Benghazi and make it to the White House. The Clinton political machine is in full campaign mode already, preparing for 2016 and hoping voters forget by then that she had a key role in the Obama administration’s handling of the terror attack. But that’s becoming more difficult as the GOP appears to be laying the groundwork for tying Clinton to Benghazi and making sure it stays front and center in the next campaign.Some of the testimony from State Department whistleblowers
|
Pelosi: Sequestration Preventing Me
from Visiting Troops on Mother´s Day
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/10/2013 5:55:08 AM
Post Reply
|
|
"Every year for the past few years, on Mother´s Day, I´ve gone--I´ve taken a delegation--into Afghanistan or Iraq, we´re alternating now, now Afghanistan--for Mother´s Day to say thank you to our moms and, by the way, our grandmothers, who are serving there. Some young grandmothers. But, nonetheless, grandmothers. To also thank all of our troops for what they do to protect America´s families. I won´t be going this particular weekend because we don´t have--you know, under sequestration, we don´t have codels."
|
Benghazi Whistleblower Attorney:
Congress Must Subpoena Hillary
Clinton to Testify Again
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/10/2013 10:05:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Earlier today, we learned about a bombshell report that said the CIA´s Benghazi talking points were changed 12 times, with extensive input from the State Department. It comes after State Department whistleblower Gregory Hicks testified Wednesday that he was shocked when he saw Susan Rice blaming a protest for the attack on numerous talk shows. Martha MacCallum discussed the next steps in the investigation of what happened in Benghazi with Hicks´ attorney, Victoria Toensing. At this point, she thinks "it´s about time" that House Republicans start issuing subpoenas,
|
The Benghazi Lie
|
|
National Review Online, by Mark Steyn
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/10/2013 5:16:17 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Shortly before last November’s election I took part in a Fox News documentary on Benghazi, whose other participants included the former governor of New Hampshire John Sununu. Making chit-chat while the camera crew were setting up, Governor Sununu said to me that in his view Benghazi mattered because it was “a question of character.” That’s correct. On a question of foreign policy or counterterrorism strategy, men of good faith can make the wrong decisions. But a failure of character corrodes the integrity of the state. That’s why career diplomat Gregory Hicks’s testimony
|
Report: Muslim cleric invited
to pray over fallen SEALs
damns them during service
|
|
Washington Times, by Jessica Chasmar
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ScarletPimpernel- 5/9/2013 6:23:57 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The families of Navy SEALs killed in an August 2011 shoot-down of a helicopter in Afghanistan spoke at a press conference Thursday morning, citing a number of grievances, including an allegation that the Pentagon invited a Muslim cleric who “disparaged in Arabic the memory of these servicemen.” In addition to blasting the Obama administration for the mission and for an official investigation they deemed a cover-up, the families complained that “military brass, while prohibiting any mention of a Judeo-Christian God, invited a Muslim cleric to the funeral for the fallen
|
IRS Apologizes for Targeting
Conservative Groups
|
|
Associated Press, by Stephen Ohlemacher
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/10/2013 11:14:39 AM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service is apologizing for inappropriately flagging conservative political groups for additional reviews during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status. Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS unit that oversees tax-exempt groups, said organizations that included the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their applications for tax-exempt status were singled out for additional reviews. Lerner said the practice, initiated by low-level workers in Cincinnati, was wrong and she apologized while speaking at a conference in Washington. Many conservative groups complained during the election
|
Report: Patriots coach Bill Belichick
´hates´ Tim Tebow as a player
|
|
CBS News, by Ryan Wilson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: NorthernDog- 5/10/2013 10:10:49 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It´s been 11 days and counting since the Jets cut ties with Tim Tebow and 13 months since they traded for him. Much of the conversation in the past week and a half has been about which teams -- if any -- would be interested in the former Heisman Trophy winner. The usual suspects include Tebow´s hometown Jacksonville Jaguars, but new general manager David Caldwell has said in no uncertain terms that Tebow isn´t an option (laudatory commercials from local lawyers notwithstanding). The other, less conventional landing spot: New England. Coach Bill Belichick sees value where other talent evaluators don´t
|
|
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|
