A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Ryan to Rubio: ´Know Any Good Diners
in Iowa or New Hampshire?´

Weekly Standard, by Staff

Original Article

Posted By:Oblio, 12/5/2012 6:21:25 AM

At an event in Washington, D.C. this evening, Paul Ryan asked Marco Rubio, "Know any good diners in Iowa or New Hampshire?" The reference, of course, is to the first state to hold a primary contest (the Iowa Caucus) and the first to in the nation to hold a primary election (New Hampshire). Both men are said to be contenders for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination.Ryan, the Wisconsin congressman, is the House Budget Committee chair, and was the Republican vice presidential nominee last election. Rubio is the junior senator from Florida, and a rising Republican star.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Spidey, 12/5/2012 7:33:52 AM     (No. 9049381)

There´s things to like about Rubio but if going to win it´ll have to be on conservative bedrock issues,not bringing latino voters in. 2nd,3rd generation Cubans are throwing in with the mainstream anti-republican latino crowd.Castro and communist hating of the 50´s and 60´s is fading from these people´s heritage.

Being Catholic isn´t a big winner either as liberal Catholics have overtaken the religion.Latinos are supposedly mostly Catholics but somehow they got a different version of the 10 commandments than everybody else.Thou shall not covet thy neighbor´s goods? Does that include welfare benefits?

Rubio´s dream act light isn´t a winner when Obama´s for whole hog amnesty under any conditions.How is going to college make you a better candidate for citizenship when they´re studying useless college courses while student loan debt passes a trillion dollars?

You have people in other countries waiting for years to come in here legitimately,when all these people have to do is walk across the border.Yet republicans seem to be saying there´s nothing wrong with this.

The biggest reason republicans are stuck right now is they keep applying Reagan era solutions to modern day problems.In the absence of new solutions,we´re going to keep getting ran over by the left.














































































  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: dadofboys, 12/5/2012 7:53:13 AM     (No. 9049412)

Why anyone would waste 4 years of their life attempting to become president on the republican ticket is a mystery to me. There is no way that you can beat the Dem machine. Please, politicians, just GO AWAY and leave me alone for many, many years!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Mrs. Obelix, 12/5/2012 7:58:15 AM     (No. 9049421)

So-- who will it be? Ryan, Rubio, Jindal, Santorum, Palin, or someone else-- you have four years to make your case, fellas. Oppose Obama daily, vigorously, with brains and principles for the base and folksy emotional connections for the non-base. Show us you are a leader.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 4 - Posted by: Johnny Angle, 12/5/2012 8:05:48 AM     (No. 9049433)

Gowdy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Daisymay, 12/5/2012 8:10:47 AM     (No. 9049439)

I don´t think Immigration is going to be an issue in 2016. I think by then Obama will have let all the Illegals in and given those who are already here some kind of legal status. I like Rubio, always have. I think he´s very smart and would do a good job as President. I´m not sure Ryan could win, but I do like him a lot. I guess we should just sit back and watch what unfolds in the next three plus years. Our world is definitely going to change...big time!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 12/5/2012 8:19:50 AM     (No. 9049456)

Let´s not forget that in 2006, hardly anyone knew who Barack Obama was. He started his rise in 2007, and by November of 2008, he had won the biggest prize this country awards.

The point is that there could likely be someone out there, not on our horizon yet. What´s important is to stick to our nerve, stay cohesive, and the right person will rise up for us.

(Or go underground, like the pro-regressives have done, and infiltrate the opposition ranks and sabotage everything they do and believe in from within. I´m thinking of reregistering as a Democrat, and let the games begin.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: StormCnter, 12/5/2012 8:27:16 AM     (No. 9049474)

We won´t win in 2016 or any year if we cannot find a way to not only welcome, but to celebrate many of the groups who are afraid of our rhetoric. Hispanics, single women, Catholics, young people are groups who can be part of us. Ryan and Rubio are off to a good start. President George W. Bush has gone public with a lot of the right ideas, too. We don´t have to destroy what we stand for, but we certainly have to retool and focus our message.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: LZK, 12/5/2012 8:41:10 AM     (No. 9049489)

I really don´t care -- right now....

For NOW -- I´m going to practice my traditional conservative values -- enjoy my family -- go to Mass -- and enjoy my life....

Sooooooo --- all you DC pundits can razzle/dazzle your reporting -- I´m unplugging....

Merry Christmas everyone.....

LZK

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: bogeegolf, 12/5/2012 8:50:22 AM     (No. 9049500)

We haven´t even made it through Obamas first term yet.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Felixcat, 12/5/2012 9:11:30 AM     (No. 9049534)

So how do we appeal to those groups who are afraid of our rhetoric? So two Senate
candidates say stupid things and we all are to suffer?

Immigration - well, according to Haley Barbour - we or rather Colonel Sanders needs those illegals...The only reason George W Bush and Congress caved a few years back (the good ol days) is becuase the we the people voiced our opinion. "Cause this country needs more people to mow our lawns, slaughter our farm food animals, clean our houses. Let´s not reform our immigration system to allow more professional and skilled people in - no let´s cave in to an ethnic mix hyped as one large homogenous group who we are always being told are "natural Republicans."

If the only way the Republican party is going to win is to become even more Democrat (out bribe the bribers) than the Democrats, then count me out.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: nina584, 12/5/2012 9:31:57 AM     (No. 9049575)

#7 we will never get those groups.How about why 3 million people stayed home? This 3 mill would have given the reps a sweep. Stop pushing moderate weird religion guys and the full rep electorate will show up.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 12 - Posted by: Holeymoses, 12/5/2012 9:33:34 AM     (No. 9049580)

Maybe it´s this: You can´t win if you´re part of the white minority.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: OregonBoomerGirl, 12/5/2012 9:41:23 AM     (No. 9049599)

I listen to Mark Levin all the time, and I think he has it right. Stick to bedrock conservative values, but MAKE THE CASE. We need a candidate who can explain about these values, why they are important, and why they work for everyone. I never hear this!

Even now, with this fiscal cliff mess, I never hear Republicans in power explaining why they don´t want taxes raised on the rich. I hear on the news they won´t, but the impression people get is Republicans protecting their rich buddies.

Why can´t they, as Mark says, puy some TV time, and every month or so, have a half hour where they explain conservative views? Or have their own cable channel, run it over and over. Advertise it on billboards so people will know it´s there. Try more creative things, for pete´s sake!

They don´t want to win badly enough, that´s obvious. Just watch Boehner. The establishment ones are too much like Dems.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: gesundheit, 12/5/2012 10:10:31 AM     (No. 9049677)

If taxing and spending is the road to ruin, as Conservatives believe, then the U.S., after another four years under the destructive policies of Obama and Harry Reid, will be ruined, and there will be no problem electing a Republican president in 2016.

The reason our economy hasn´t collapsed yet is because Obama and the Democrats postponed eliminating the Bush tax cuts when the Democrats controlled both houses of Congress, and then were unable to do so after the Republicans won the House in 2010.

But now, thanks to the 2011 debt-ceiling agreement´s expiration on January 1st, taxes will be raised, and the private sector will inevitably suffer.

The Democrats also postponed the implementation of ObamaCare until next year, which means that the dire economic consequences for employers of complying with it will further cripple our economy.

By 2016, we´ll be in extremely serious trouble, primarily because the Democrats have adamantly refused to support the Simpson-Bowles-Ryan budget proposals.

So who would make a better Republican spokesperson to explain to Americans why their country is collapsing than Paul Ryan himself? Let´s hope he continues to speak out as often as possible.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: lalo, 12/5/2012 10:13:44 AM     (No. 9049689)

#13 is right, and excuse my obsession with this, but the Republicans need to get across, constantly and clearly, why they don´t want to tax the rich. It is insane that they have not done this and apparently don´t even have a clue that they need to do it. Forget about candidates for now (certainly forget about Ryan; as he has ´accountant´ written all over him will never win) -- the Republicans need to launch a campaign to educate the public on the principles.

We need to turn around the association of the Republicans with the rich. And this may need to start by being willing to tax at least the top one percent.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: lalo, 12/5/2012 10:15:19 AM     (No. 9049695)

To ´raise the taxes´ on the top one percent, that is....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: ScarletPimpernel, 12/5/2012 10:43:33 AM     (No. 9049772)

"We won´t win in 2016 or any year if we cannot find a way to not only welcome, but to celebrate many of the groups who are afraid of our rhetoric."

And what "rhetoric" would that be? That America is the greatest country in the history of the world? That we believe in hard work and not hand-outs? That you must transfer your loyalties when you become an American citizen? That if you come to live here your new country is now the United States of America and not Mexico, El Salvador, Egypt, Iraq, or Pakistan? That once you become an American citizen your "heritage" becomes that of the Pilgrims and Puritans?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Cleanhousein2012, 12/5/2012 10:50:35 AM     (No. 9049794)

Neither of Rubio´s parents was an American citizen at birth- he is not a Natural Born Citizen. You can be sure this would be used against him. Ryan´s brand is ruined both by being Romney´s second, and because Boehner is going full Republicat on us. As we are now seeing, the Rebups are racing to the left. They are confused how large parts of their base sat out? Maybe it´s because everyday they look and act more like Dems while doing everything to disintermediation their base. 2016 will be the birth of a third party.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Nan, 12/5/2012 10:59:26 AM     (No. 9049825)

Part of ´Spidey´s´ comment nailed it

"Being Catholic isn´t a big winner either as liberal Catholics have overtaken the religion.Latinos are supposedly mostly Catholics but somehow they got a different version of the 10 commandments than everybody else.Thou shall not covet thy neighbor´s goods? Does that include welfare benefits?"


  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 20 - Posted by: RancherJack, 12/5/2012 11:02:08 AM     (No. 9049832)

What happens when you insist on continuing to do what has always been done, but it doesn´t work?

Yeah.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: tisHimself, 12/5/2012 11:06:33 AM     (No. 9049850)

Butts in the pews Catholics (BIP)s, came out at almost 80% for Romney.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: fayebeck, 12/5/2012 11:25:38 AM     (No. 9049920)

Onliest advice to the Republicans. Do not have press conferences called debates. Do not permit more than 3 candidates on stage together in a press conference called a debate.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Pluperfect, 12/5/2012 11:59:21 AM     (No. 9050003)

#23, I don´t think anyone said a thing about "standing with illegals". But we should reach out to those legal Hispanics who are our friends and neighbors and who don´t understand why the GOP speaks of them in the same breath as the river-swimmers. The words have to be softened so that those good folks know we want them on our side. Rick Perry says that Hispanics become Republicans as they move from lower income to middle and upper income. He gets about 45 percent of the Texas Hispanic vote.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: KimoSaavy, 12/5/2012 12:34:13 PM     (No. 9050063)

Wow #7, I thought I was alone. For the longest I have been sharing with Ldotters on the need to bring in more minorities into the party. I knew this before the 2012 elections and knew we were going to get hammered for allowing the marxist re-define Republicans.

Instead, Romney failed to capitalized and refused to fight BO the way he did Paul and Gingrich. There is also a prevalent attitude that Hispanics are dirty and some come to this very site to express it. Assuming this is a tiny winy microcosm of conservatives/republicans, I predicted the Hispanic vote for BO. In fact, this attitude is one of the reason they voted for BO. The sad truth is that BO could care less for Hispanics.

As a Conservative and Independent, I am done with the Republicans. I see them only as a means to the end of a dem´s run to a seat anywhere. But the future lays in the Constitutional Party (yea, my dream) which I hope guys like Rubio and Ryan can make happen. The repubs have no use for conservatives and in 2014 Boehner will get fire for being an ingrate. I predict no more wins for the R´s unless a substantial political chage happens.

Hint: There are lots of disenfranchise people from unexpected places, minorities, even dems. I think the reps have become too stupid to find them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 25 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 12/5/2012 1:39:24 PM     (No. 9050175)

Rubio is up for reelection in the senate in 2016. He can`t run for both offices.

Will he risk his senate seat?

At this point, I`m with #2. The Dems have cheating and fraud down to a science. With no GOP voter fraud opposition how can a republican ever win back the WH. A GOP candidate would have to have a 65-35 lead going into election day to even have a longshot chance of winning.

Good luck with that. It`s probably Hillary in 2016.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: starboard, 12/5/2012 1:54:40 PM     (No. 9050210)

I agree with #7 and #25. If we don´t try to be more attractive to all people, the GOP will become extinct. We need to be the party of those who pay taxes and want to leave their children a bright and exciting future.

When Bush ran in 2004, they knew in order to win he had to get 40% of the Hispanic vote. He got 43% and he won. They had their strategy figured out and it worked.

Right now the Republicans should focus on rebranding and retooling themselves, but also, developing a strategy of doing whatever it takes to win. The good news is we have a bevy of shining stars coming up the pike. The Dems have Hillary.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 12/5/2012 6:50:40 PM     (No. 9050574)

We may actually have faced the crossing of the break even point in the fight to preserve freedom. The battle was lost in the class rooms of public schools. The left took over the elections no one thought mattered; the elections of our School Board members. That was begun only 40 years ago- we lost those elections in setting our sights constantly too high in the national elections. Now, the left has raised up their crop of useful little idiots in the useful adult voting idiots. That´s where the battle for the nations future was lost- in the hearts and minds of our very own children.

It will not matter one whit what candidte we choose to run for President. It will matter who we chose to run in the communities and towns of our smallest elections- and now, even that battle front may be too left oriented to even try.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 28 - Posted by: armywife85, 12/5/2012 7:12:09 PM     (No. 9050600)

Until we have voters that actually use the brains the good lord provided them with and even an ounce of common sense....we will continue to lose. Until the GOP gets it´s crap together in all of the states and we have voter ID in every state,closed primaries and put a stop to this early voting nonsense we will continue to lose. Until the RNC and the teaparty figure out a way to work together instead of attacking each other we will continue to lose. Until we as a party learn to rally around our candidate and quit throwing fits because our ideal isn´t the nominee and stop all this 3rd party nonsense we will continue to lose.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 12/5/2012 9:43:34 PM     (No. 9050740)

The only trouble (for Rubio and Ryan et al) now...the dim presidential candidate continue to define their republican opponent before the repub opponent is smart enough to do it first, the msm parrots the dim talking points and manufactures the reasons to marginalize the repub candidate, the repub candidates destroy each other in the primary process, the sheep get politically informed via their community organizers and the msm,the religious right sits out future presidential elections to make their statement (nope, couldn´t wake up and vote for a mormon last month), then women, hispanics, and the illegals lapping up their government handouts and goodies so Obie-like presidents are good for them.

Now that the dims know how to steal elections, how do we break from this ugly picture?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 714477




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"



The Secrets of Princeton
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Piercing the secrecy of
offshore tax havens
Washington Post, by Scott Higham, Michael Hudson*    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 7:06:15 AM     Post Reply
A New York hedge fund manager allegedly swindles $12 million from a prominent Baltimore family. An Indiana couple is accused of bilking hundreds of customers by charging for free trials of cosmetic products. A financial manager in Texas promises 23-percent returns but absconds with $33.5 million of his investors’ money in a classic Ponzi scheme.All three cases have one thing in common: money that ended up in offshore accounts and trusts set up in tax havens around the world.

Former News Corp President
Chernin bids $500 million for Hulu
Reuters, by Ronald Grover and Jennifer Saba    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:49:03 AM     Post Reply
Former News Corp president Peter Chernin has bid around $500 million for Hulu, the online video streaming service he helped create in 2007, according to two sources with knowledge of Hulu´s sale process. The website, jointly controlled by News Corp and Walt Disney Co, reached out to potential buyers in March after initially contemplating a deal in which one would buy out the other. It is not clear whether that transaction is still being contemplated.

After Pentagon investigations, three
Army generals censured for misconduct
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:08:11 AM     Post Reply
After lengthy investigations, the Pentagon has determined that three Army generals committed misconduct in separate incidents, adding to an unusually long list of senior military commanders who have been censured over the past year.On Friday, defense officials confirmed that Army Maj. Gen. Ralph O. Baker, the commander of a strategic counterterrorism force on the Horn of Africa, was fired March 28 on charges of sexual misconduct. Two officials familiar with the case said Baker was investigated for allegedly groping a female civilian employee after he had been drinking.

Diplomacy downplay: Obama administration
minimizes latest North Korean nuke threat
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor and Shaun Waterman    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 7:02:06 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration appeared eager Thursday to downplay the North Korean military’s latest threat that it has the final authority to carry out “cutting-edge, smaller, lighter and diversified” nuclear strikes on the United States.“This is just the latest in a long line of aggressive statements,” (Snip)the recent tension between Washington and Pyongyang “does not need to get hotter.”The remarks were the first public reaction from the Obama administration since Wednesday’s claim by the North Korean military that the “moment of explosion is approaching fast” with the possibility of war breaking out “today or tomorrow.”

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Charles Murray´s Gay-Marriage Surprise
New Yorker, by Jane Mayer    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/17/2013 5:00:38 PM     Post Reply
Political scientist Charles Murray has never backed away from controversy, but usually his opponents have been liberals. Friday, however, he managed to upset conservatives at the annual conference known as CPAC, where thousands of bewildered Republicans gathered to figure out the way forward after their party’s 2012 electoral defeat. Murray ditched his prepared remarks on “America Coming Apart” in favor of an impromptu admonition to fellow conservatives to accept the legalization of both gay marriage and abortion.

With a Speech, Cardinal
Set Path to Papacy
Wall Street Journal, by Stacy Meichtry    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/16/2013 7:48:58 AM     Post Reply
VATICAN CITY—It took Jorge Mario Bergoglio four minutes to convince fellow cardinals he was their leader. Speaking in the Paul VI grand hall of the Vatican, the Argentine cardinal warned the Catholic Church against focusing too much on matters close to home—advice that came against the backdrop of a papacy that had been consumed by infighting among Vatican officials, a dwindling flock in Europe and secular trends in the West. The 76-year-old Father Jorge, as he is known back home, said Roman Catholicism needed to shift its focus outward, to the world beyond Rome—rather than being "self-referential," he said.

Obama in Jerusalem
New York Sun, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/16/2013 7:43:15 AM     Post Reply
When President Obama gets to Jerusalem next week, one of the signals to listen for is an indication of what country he thinks he’s in. Normally this is clear when the President — any president — goes to the capital of a foreign country. He’s in whatever country the capital is capital of. But Mr. Obama has been refusing to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Not only that, but he has been refusing to admit that Jerusalem is even in Israel.

President Obama bombs in
comments about a nuclear Iran
New York Daily News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/16/2013 7:28:35 AM     Post Reply
Approaching his first presidential trip to Israel, President Obama offered a fresh and foolish — if not feckless — assessment of the Iranian nuclear threat. "Right now, we think it would take over a year or so for Iran to actually deliver a nuclear weapon, but obviously we don’t want to cut it too close,” the President told an Israeli television interviewer, in the process cutting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu off at the knees and giving the mullahs breathing room to keep enriching uranium.

What Rand Paul got right
Los Angeles Times, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/12/2013 7:28:03 AM     Post Reply
I hope I´m not too late to the fight.Last week, freshman Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) held an old-fashioned filibuster against the nomination of John Brennan to head the CIA. Paul´s stated reason for taking to the floor and talking for 13 hours was that the Obama administration wouldn´t give him a straight answer on the question of whether the president can unilaterally order the killing of American citizens on American soil with "lethal force, such as a drone strike … and without trial."

No, 80 Percent of NYC High School
Graduates Are Not Illiterate
New York Magazine, by Adam Martin    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/9/2013 1:10:10 PM     Post Reply
An unfortunate story on CBS New York Thursday carried this headline: "Officials: 80 Percent Of Recent NYC High School Graduates Cannot Read." It´s a shocker, but it´s also untrue. And to make things worse, the story that followed was riddled with typos. According to the New York Post, which reported the same story earlier on Thursday, "79.3 percent of city public-school grads who went to CUNY’s six two-year colleges arrived without having mastered the basics" of reading, writing, and math, and had to take non-credit remedial classes to catch up.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Controversy as Donald Rumsfeld says
a ´trained ape´ would manage the
troop withdrawal in Afghanistan
better than Obama

72 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Meghan Keneally    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/26/2014 6:17:18 AM     Post Reply
Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has said that ´a trained ape´ could do a better job managing American interests in Afghanistan than President Obama. The retired Republican made the insult while doing a phone-in interview for Greta Van Susteren´s Fox News show on Tuesday. He argued that the President made a serious error by failing to negotiate a status forces agreement with Afghan President Hamid Karzai. Gawker points out that such an agreement would effectively commit the United States to having a certain number of troops in the country for a number of years beyond the already-agreed-upon plan which

Secret Service agents in Obama’s
detail sent home from Netherlands
after night of drinking

50 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Carol D. Leonnig & David Nakamura    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 3/25/2014 10:34:51 PM     Post Reply
Three Secret Service agents responsible for protecting President Obama in Amsterdam this week were sent home and put on administrative leave Sunday after going out for a night of drinking, according to three people familiar with the incident. One of them was found drunk and passed out in a hotel hallway, the people said. The hotel staff alerted the U.S. Embassy in the Netherlands after finding the unconscious agent Sunday morning, a day before Obama arrived in the country, according to two of the people. The embassy then alerted Secret Service managers on the presidential trip, which included Secret Service

At the Supreme Court, a potential
catastrophe for women’s rights

42 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Sandra Fluke    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/25/2014 11:58:55 AM     Post Reply
A pair of potentially catastrophic cases will be argued before the Supreme Court on Tuesday. These cases are brought by privately held, for-profit corporations that are arguing their religious convictions should preclude them from offering employees the health insurance required by law. Specifically, these private employers don’t want to allow their employees’ insurance to cover some forms of birth control because, contrary to medicaland scientific evidence, they believe some birth control causes abortions. Corporations are not people. Corporations cannot have religious views. If religious rights are extended to corporations, it puts us on a slippery slope where any private company

Michelle: ´There Were Actually Laws in
America that Allowed Discrimination
Against Black People Like Me´

38 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 3/25/2014 12:12:59 PM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama talked about America as she visited a school today in China. She talked about the American dream: And my story isn’t unusual in America. Some of our most famous athletes, like LeBron James, and artists, like the singer Janelle Monae, came from struggling families like mine, as do many business leaders -- like Howard Schultz. He’s the head of a company called Starbucks, which many of you may have heard of. When Mr. Schultz was a boy his father lost his job, leaving their family destitute. But Mr. Schultz worked hard. He got a scholarship to a

Democratic pollster predicts ´huge
turnout disadvantage´ in 2014

35 replie(s)
CNN, by Peter Hamby    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/26/2014 4:57:49 AM     Post Reply
Washington - A leading Democratic pollster predicted a "sobering" turnout disadvantage for her party in this year´s midterm elections and called on Democrats to articulate "a bigger economic agenda" this fall. "There is a huge turnout disadvantage and challenge," Democratic pollster Celinda Lake said Tuesday at a breakfast with reporters. "There is always a challenge in turnout in an off year, but it´s really dramatic this time." Lake was speaking a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor. Lake and Republican pollster Ed Goeas revealed results of a new George Washington University poll that showed GOP voter intensity in 2014 outpacing

Busted! After promising ´no delay´ in
final Obamacare sign-up deadline, Obama
administration unveils new ´honor system´ *

31 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 3/26/2014 12:51:26 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is prepared to give prospective Obamacare enrollees another half-month to signup for insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act website, healthcare.gov, treating the law´s March 31 regulatory deadline as a formality for Americans who claim they tried in earnest to sign up in time. During a March 12 congressional hearing, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told Texas Republican Rep. Kevin Brady that there would be no such extensions. ´Are you going to delay the open enrollment beyond March 31?´ Brady asked. ´No, sir,´ she replied. On the same day, Julie Bataille, a spokeswoman for the

It´s time for White House to start sweating
over legal challenge to Obamacare subsidies

29 replie(s)
Washington Examiner [DC], by Philip Klein    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/26/2014 5:25:58 AM     Post Reply
As the U.S. Supreme Court weighed the constitutionality of a contraception coverage mandate Tuesday morning, a federal appeals court heard a separate legal challenge that could have much more sweeping implications for the future of President Obama´s health care law. And if the oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit are any indication, it’s time for the White House to start sweating over a lawsuit that up until now has flown relatively below the radar. At issue in the case are the subsidies that the federal government provides for individuals purchasing insurance through Obamacare. Though the text

Harry Reid: Obamacare Delayed
Because ‘People Are Not Educated
About How to Use the Internet’

28 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Noah Rothman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 3/26/2014 1:47:46 PM     Post Reply
On Wednesday, Obama administration officials announced a two week extension in the deadline to enroll in the Affordable Care Act or face a penalty defined as a tax. Asked about this “delay” in the implementation of the ACA on Wednesday, Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) said that there has been no delay. He added that some of the users who experienced problems with the website early on need more time, partially because “people are not educated about how to use the internet.” “There’s no hiccup or delay,” Reid insisted. “We had hundreds of thousands of people who tried to sign up and

Andrea Mitchell Slams Hobby
Lobby: ´What Right Do They Have
to Interfere With Medical
Decisions by Women?´

28 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 3/25/2014 10:21:26 PM     Post Reply
On her 12 p.m. ET hour MSNBC show on Tuesday, host Andrea Mitchell interrogated attorney Mark Rienzi for representing Hobby Lobby in the Supreme Court case against the ObamaCare contraception mandate: "What right do they have, again, to interfere with medical decisions by women?...I mean, this gets to the whole issue of women´s health and why should women be discriminated against in ways that other medical beneficiaries are not?" [Listen to the audio or watch the video after the jump] Rienzi pushed back: "No one´s discriminating against women, Andrea, all they´re saying is that, you´re right, these are personal decisions,

President Obama got elected
on competency. Now people
are starting to wonder.

27 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Chris Cillizza    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 3/26/2014 4:57:05 PM     Post Reply
On Tuesday night two things happened. 1. A trio of Secret Service agents were sent home from Amsterdam after one was found passed out drunk in a hotel hallway. 2. The Obama Administration announced (another) extension of the enrollment deadline for Obamacare signups. At first glance, these two events have little in common with one another. But, modern politics is all about narratives and storylines. And, both of these events confirm a growing concern from the public about President Obama: That he´s just not up to governing his administration and, by extension, the country, effectively.

Sotomayor, Kagan: Hobby Lobby Should
Drop Insurance, Pay Penalty and Let
Employees Use Exchange

27 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Penny Starr    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 3/25/2014 3:43:04 PM     Post Reply
During oral arguments in the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday which focused on whether the contraceptive mandate in the Affordable Care Act violates the free exercise of religion, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan suggested employers who have moral objections to birth control should not provide health care coverage for their employees. “But isn´t there another choice nobody talks about, which is paying the tax, which is a lot less than a penalty and a lot less than -- than the cost of health insurance at all?” Sotomayor said during the presentation by attorney Paul Clement, who represents Hobby Lobby Stores

Northwestern University football players
can unionize, federal agency says

25 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 3/26/2014 3:40:31 PM     Post Reply
Chicago - In a ruling that could revolutionize college sports, a federal agency has given football players at Northwestern University the green light to unionize. Wednesday´s landmark ruling by a regional director of National Labor Relations Board means the players are deemed employees under federal law and so can create the nation´s first college athletes´ union. Union lawyers argued the Big Ten school´s football players are part of a commercial enterprise that generates hefty profits through their labor. The NCAA, Big Ten Conference and the private school vehemently opposed the union drive. Northwestern argued that college athletes are


Post Reply   Close thread 714477





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS