 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Jonah Goldberg To Fox Panel: Republicans Are In A Shocking Amount Of Disarray
Mediaite, by Andrew Kirell
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Drive, 11/27/2012 7:13:30 AM
|
| Appearing on Special Report this evening, conservative columnist Jonah Goldberg had a pretty harsh assessment of the Republican Party at this current moment. “The Republicans are in a shocking amount of disarray right now,” Goldberg told host Bret Baier. “I think the House Republicans are slightly more disciplined, which is why you’re not hearing a lot of House Republicans out there talking.” He took a swipe at congressmen like Rep. Peter King (R-NY) who “wasn’t part of the [fiscal cliff] conversation” talking about the party’s potential tax plans despite not holding much actual weight in the actual negotiations.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Wetlandz, 11/27/2012 7:18:53 AM (No. 9035481)
Well duh
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
noproblems, 11/27/2012 7:24:29 AM (No. 9035487)
thanks for the laugh #1
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
gator, 11/27/2012 7:50:57 AM (No. 9035519)
Anyone who´s been waiting around for the GOP or elections to fix the sad and declining state of America, are as stupid as an Obama voter. We get the country our forefathers died for back by being willing to do the same, and time and hope are fleeting.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
MDConservative, 11/27/2012 7:55:45 AM (No. 9035527)
They´re politicians...
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
dman, 11/27/2012 7:57:36 AM (No. 9035529)
Remember when the party nominee was considered the defacto party leader until the next convention? Not that I want to hear any more from him, but the silence from Mitt is deafening.
The GOP is broken beyond repair. What is their goal and strategy going forward? This "house divided" needs to fall. We need a new party with some purpose and some cajones.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
altoona, 11/27/2012 8:08:29 AM (No. 9035547)
Jonah nails it.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Maybeth, 11/27/2012 8:19:42 AM (No. 9035575)
But wait, Jonah! Elsewhere this morning, we read that the GOP is tossing the name of Jeb Bush against the wall to see if it sticks. .... I find that to be a little much.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
JLoophole, 11/27/2012 8:38:24 AM (No. 9035610)
Right now the Republican Party reminds me of those little churches all over the map, each consisting of a group of people who fought over a jot or tittle and splintered away in righteous indignation, started their own First Church of the Jot, and then splintered again when the Tittles got offended....and on and on.
What do we agree on? What do we want to achieve? What top 5 issues should be paramount? What will make or break America?
I believe that without a business-friendly country, an easier tax code, freedom to explore for our own oil, an expectation of personal responsibility from all Americans, and politicians who get the same health care and pensions as any other public SERVANT, nothing else is going to be achieved. And maybe that´s why we´re fractured. Who except the average non-politician Republican would want that?
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Melody, 11/27/2012 8:42:42 AM (No. 9035621)
It´s always a nice surprise to see Jonah on that panel. He should have had Charles´ seat.
I would love to see a new conservative party. They needn´t bother, though, if it´s just the old one reheated. It needs to be one that has room for God at the top.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Gretchen, 11/27/2012 8:43:42 AM (No. 9035622)
Sadly the Republican Party has become a joke.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
ColoWapiti, 11/27/2012 9:09:59 AM (No. 9035667)
When I attended our caucus this year, I made the comment that the GOP was in trouble. People snickered and laughed at me. It sucks to be right because it shows how clueless the members of the party really are. They are at home licking their wounds. Me? I am done with the GOP. It is gutless and leaderless. Bush? Really?? Stupid is as stupid does.
I am preparing my family to survive the coming collapse of the Dollar, and the takeover of the socialist statists.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Lust For Justice, 11/27/2012 9:10:36 AM (No. 9035669)
I concur with reply #9. Jonah is like a breath of fresh air, and SHOULD have had Charles´ seat. Of a truth though, the vast majority of "pubbies" I wouldn´t give a plug nickle for. Maybe they can stick their finger in the air wet and figure out what to do......
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Eheu Fugaces, 11/27/2012 9:13:12 AM (No. 9035675)
The GOP is stomping down the path laid out by its predecessor, the Whig Party. A new, vigorous, principled party cannot be formed until the GOP "leadership" has finished retracting into a small, exclusive, increasingly ineffective "me too" clique -- at process begun in 1932 and only briefly interrupted during 1981 - 1988. They apparently believe that country needs another Democrat party, only one that´s a lot smoother and sleeker, and wants to be a little less brutal in guiding the country into socialism.
Jonah is too kind. "Disarray" hardly describes the havoc and disillusionment being wrought by this gaggle of placemen, cowards, appeasers and grandees devoid of any political principle except that of saving their own careers at any cost.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
sickened, 11/27/2012 9:15:08 AM (No. 9035682)
Time for Tea. The Tea Party, that is. The Republican Party is too full of conformists who "just want to be loved" by the liberal denizens of DC.
Does anyone know what the leadership vote was for Boehner on the first day back? Is that a secret vote? Are we not allowed to know the level of his non-support? If I saw that number going up, I might have some hope left.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
montanabound, 11/27/2012 9:16:50 AM (No. 9035686)
Well said, #13.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
WAN2, 11/27/2012 9:17:28 AM (No. 9035687)
Republicans are in disarray only until they figure out which stuff THEY want to give away.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Rubinski, 11/27/2012 9:21:27 AM (No. 9035696)
What preparations are you making, #11?
I agree, bad times are coming.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
lillehuset, 11/27/2012 9:26:02 AM (No. 9035707)
I saw Jonah on Fox yesterday......I agree he made some important points however I have seen him go negative on Republicans before and it bothers me ......and Jonah forget the comb over it looks silly.........
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
artman1746, 11/27/2012 9:39:57 AM (No. 9035731)
Republicans will continually lose in both politics and world conflict. It seems they never will accept that to go into battle they must get down on the level of the opposition. In politics they stand by and watch themselves vilified, lied about, personally insulted and slapped around even from the House and Senate floors. Then they claim they must be cordial and respectful to those who do it even as they see such vitriol win elections.
It is frustrating to see the hardball tactics used successfully by liberals be rejected by the conservatives as an unfair way to fight even as they go down in flames come election time.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
bob913, 11/27/2012 9:39:58 AM (No. 9035733)
The rinos are taking advantage. I have never read so many negative whoa is me articles before. The republicans did alright in this and in 2010 elections.
Get rid of the rinos who are promoting - get this Jeb Bush as the next nominee!
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Judith, 11/27/2012 9:43:28 AM (No. 9035743)
This is what happens when you have no core. The dems have a core...rape and pillage.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Felixcat, 11/27/2012 9:55:29 AM (No. 9035771)
Well said #13, 19 and 21.
The Republican Party is trying to do the Sally Fields thing of they like me, they really like me by trying to be compassionate conservatices. Who is going to vote for a party that will only give you some free stuff when the other party will give you all free stuff? And in the meantime, those of us who make the free stuff possible are attacked by our own party.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
aposematic, 11/27/2012 9:59:58 AM (No. 9035778)
The GOP is allowed to exist simply because the D´s must have an ogre to beat up on to hide the D´s constant Policy failures.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
JAN, 11/27/2012 10:05:40 AM (No. 9035793)
Jonah spending too much time inside the beltway???
Thanks for nothing, dear.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
RightShoe, 11/27/2012 10:05:42 AM (No. 9035794)
I don´t feel as though I or my conservative friends are in disarray. I do believe that Republican leadership is in disarray. The back-stabbing and bloody Republican Primary made that clear. I think a lot of us were disgusted by how negative that was. And, honestly, IMHO Romney was the most negative of all and he was the party leadership favorite - just like McCain and Dole.
I must concede that Republicans have also become the party of "No." Although Romney may have had some very sound ideas, he never effectively articulated any of them (except maybe Israel.) There was no clear positive message. I think this was out of fear that he would have to explain their detail to the presstitutes. He was simply not prepared or willing to deal with them. Very sad.
I don´t think that disarray is our problem. We need to stop being cowards. Brietbart was correct in his premise that we must engage at a cultural level. No more debates run by liberal moderators. Absolutely no more!! Darrell Issa can demand documents all he wants (it´s his job) but we need to start showing pictures and interviews of the Mexican families whose lives have been destroyed by Eric Holder´s gun running. We need to start producing documentaries like "Roger and Me" to bring home the incredible loss that this country has experienced since Pelosi and Reid took over.
Finish up licking our wounds, but let´s move on at take the fight against Liberals for a change.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
RedWhiteBlue, 11/27/2012 10:11:36 AM (No. 9035808)
#17 ´´What preparations are you making, #11?
I agree, bad times are coming.´´
I´d LOVE to know also how to prepare for it. I left my homeland many years ago to get AWAY from the mess we are about to face here but I can´t think of a country to escape to at this point. Give us some clues.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
coldborezero, 11/27/2012 10:15:53 AM (No. 9035817)
I firmly believe the National Socialist Democrats are in the service of evil and the Republicans try to be in the service of good.
The difference is that the National Socialist Democrats pursue there evil goals with the relentless intensity of a rabid dog.
The Republicans just "reach across the aisle".
Perpetual losers.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
coldborezero, 11/27/2012 10:18:23 AM (No. 9035818)
"their" evil goals.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
kanphil, 11/27/2012 10:20:42 AM (No. 9035825)
As a lifelong conservative, I have given up on ever getting any true representation. I would settle for a Republican party that had PRINCIPLES and would stick with them.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 11/27/2012 10:27:42 AM (No. 9035841)
Jonah of course is 100% correct
Now here´s the $64,000 Question ... why?
Following four years of Democrats being as Communist as can be, the Republicans had the best chance they´ll ever have to gut the Dems like festering fish. Instead they floundered and fell on their pikes like callow fools.
Why?
I submit to you the Democrats recognized the first rule of winning a war is to Put Your Mind Into The Mind Of The Enemy
The Dems have won. The Republicans are now as much Dem as the Dems are.
Game over.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
capt scurvey, 11/27/2012 10:42:29 AM (No. 9035873)
They´re ringers who only pretend to oppose the democrats, so voters will at least have the illusion of an opposition party.
Been watching them for half a century or so and this is the only theory that makes all the pieces fit...
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Italiano, 11/27/2012 10:48:13 AM (No. 9035881)
Without a doubt the Democrats are the Traitor Party, the Racist Party, the Appeasing Party, the Infanticide Party, the anti-Constitution Party and every other pejorative you care to name.
The Republicans, at least in their current composition, will always and forever be the Stupid Party.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
tomishere, 11/27/2012 10:51:42 AM (No. 9035888)
I think it´s unreasonable to expect politicians to always act on principal, it goes against human nature. We have traitors to the cause in our own ranks,these who stayed home rather then vote for Romney. We mock democrats as stupid, but at least they go out and vote, there smart enough for that. I believe the it was the intellectually and emotionally challenged people in our own party that gave the election to Obama.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Lindatrippismyhero, 11/27/2012 10:57:41 AM (No. 9035900)
I cast my last vote for the Republicrats this month. Whether they are a D or a R, politicians are self-serving, power-hungry and opportunistic. Meanwhile, the propagandist media has fooled us into thinking there is a binary choice during the elections. It´s all a cynical, divisive power game and I won´t vote for either side anymore.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
cadillaqjaq, 11/27/2012 11:07:54 AM (No. 9035927)
Jonah is ´´spot on´´ regarding the fact that Republican Senators have nothing to do with any so-called bipartisan deliberations on the ´´Fiscal Cliff´´ crisis; it´s the responsibility of the Republicans who control the House of Representatives and President Obama.
The only voices I´ve heard thus far are Speaker Boehner, Obama and too many Senators of both parties who feel the apparent need to been visible.
To them I respectfully suggest; go sit quietly and await your turn. You are doing nothing but adding more confusion to an already perplexing situation.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
enemyofthestate, 11/27/2012 11:08:53 AM (No. 9035928)
Republicans should take a break, regroup and above all shut up-- until they have their act together. This is not the time for a public circular firing squad of criticism. Of course Republicans are in disarray. After the election of 2010, weren´t the Democrats in disarray?
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
planetgeo, 11/27/2012 11:12:15 AM (No. 9035935)
I have an even more basic observation: are the Republicans even a real party any more? To be a real party they need to have a real platform. Exactly what is that platform? What are the core principles around which they will coalesce? And who is the party´s "charismatic leader," the one who stands before the country as the champion of those principles?
Answer: nobody. They all waffle, waver, and weasel what they believe and what they will espouse. None of them will champion the core principles that our founders risked their lives for. They all are scrambling to "move to the middle" (which now is very left of center).
Ergo, there is no "party."
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
berlin, 11/27/2012 11:56:50 AM (No. 9036032)
Jonah, you stated the obvious quite well, thanks – tell me something I don’t know.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Sinatra5, 11/27/2012 11:57:21 AM (No. 9036035)
You have to give the b%%$%^&*^% credit - they are united in their treachery. No one circles the wagons than democraps- period. The party of the weak has been assimilated into the demoscum/Borg collective. I have been looking for options as well, and have come up empty - which doubles down on my frustration. Fine tuning the "me to - me to" repub org. is akin reorganizing the deck chair on the Titanic....
I can´t ever remember feeling this bad for soooo long now...
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
doctorfixit, 11/27/2012 12:14:55 PM (No. 9036068)
Military interventionism turns off a lot of people who really want smaller government. Rick Santorum´s Sunday School preaching turns off a lot of people. GOP politicians are incapable of handling the pro-life movement. Politicians need to be kept out of it, they do more harm than good. Politics won´t win the culture wars. If only the GOP could have stuck to simple principles: cut taxes, stop spending, stop borrowing, shrink government. On top of that they failed to stand up against the constant smears from the left about the "evil rich racist white male". Forget "the country", forget politics. Concentrate on saving our own.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
gwmcclintok, 11/27/2012 12:34:39 PM (No. 9036098)
In 2016 the Dems will find another minority to run as Pres. Can´t lose, they have it figured out now. The Republican party can go to the bottom of the ocean feed on whale excrement as far as I am concerned.
The Dems get control and they put a bulldog in as majority leader(Reid/Pelosi)...the smarmy repubs put in Trent Lott and Mitch Mconnell with John Boehner.
What a complete joke you moderate scum Republican leaders.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
Stopstoreload, 11/27/2012 12:39:48 PM (No. 9036109)
´Getting rid of Rino´s" is the opposite of understanding the problem. The party needs to work at expanding its base instead of indulging in ankle biting. The Rino suggestion reminds me of "ten miles up the Big Muddy and the Big Fool says to move on."
We have a two party system; after all of the sound and fury of the primaries, it is us against them, and if you don´t go vote for the person on the ticket who most nearly represents your views - even if he isn´t the perfect (Rino) candidate)- the other side wins.
Don´t make me have to say this again.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
GreatPlains, 11/27/2012 12:41:41 PM (No. 9036115)
# 8 has a great analysis. The Republican Party is comprised of many splintered groups , each one offended and angry and accusing the other factions. The reality is that no single faction can survive on it´s own. The issues highlighted by # 8 should be the unifying factor for all groups. Until a single leader appears who can unify the factions into a Big Tent , with every faction having to give a little to get a lot , the party will remain in disarray and be easy pickings for 2014. Some of the Republicans publicly talking about the fiscal cliff are being purposefully misquoted or half quoted by the media specifically to foment dissent. And it´s working perfectly.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
EagleJim, 11/27/2012 1:21:19 PM (No. 9036214)
Here´s what I view as conservative core principles: 1. Small gov´t 2. Small taxes 3. Small gov´t intrusion into people´s lives 4. The superiority of the individual over the collective
These principles cannot and shouldn´t be compromised. Everything else, all other issues, e.g., abortion, illegal immigration, etc., are not sacred cows. They can be worked into being used to our advantage.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
WIBadger, 11/27/2012 1:31:38 PM (No. 9036225)
There´s a reason we call them the Stupid Party.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
absalom, 11/27/2012 1:48:22 PM (No. 9036245)
#13, Eheu is on the mark but the problem began in 1912 not 1932. TR observed that ´The R Party does not belong to the Corporations; it is the Party of Lincoln and plain people...´. TR, a political visionary like Disraeli, grasped that post Civil War wealth creation, was empowering the middle class so he envisioned Labor as a natural R constituency. But his loss to Taft labled the GOP as the party of Big Business. Then when FDR gave Labor a big seat at the D table, the fate of the GOP was sealed. The nation will survive but the R carcass will not. No tears as its fossilized establishment has long outlived any useful function.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
belwhatter, 11/27/2012 3:35:17 PM (No. 9036430)
The high percentage of disatisfied ad disillusioned voters commenting on this thread are finally venting en masse how useless the two parties are, especially the one called republican. How very disappointing that all the things that are being so eagerly espoused by this goverment and its impostor in charge are what I hoped to leave behind when I immigrated legally iover forty years ago. Pravda seems to have a good handle on what´s amiss in the once great USA and I would suggest we might even consider a dacha on the Black Sea as some where to find refuge.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
Gr8Shiphandler, 11/27/2012 3:52:17 PM (No. 9036455)
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
Gr8Shiphandler, 11/27/2012 4:09:03 PM (No. 9036473)
Wow! Where did all these bed-wetters come from? Move-on? This is a conservative website, not a Republican site. Having said that, all this sobbing and carrying on in, well, unmanly. The Republicans didn´t get blown out. Do you not remember 2010? That was a blow-out. This election was relatively close. The candidate wasn´t a true blue conservative, but the issues he ran on were pretty damn close to all the policies stated here. We conservatives lost because we didn´t get the vote out against Obama. Simple as that. Too many thumb-suckers stayed at home. So, now we have four more years of Marxist goings on in the White House. So, we damn well need to support the horses we have. We have lots of good conservatives in the house and the senate. Support them. Give them some encouragement. Support some new conservative candidates. Get off your butt. Good grief man, lace up your boots and pick up your rifle and go our to face the enemy. The Great Shiphandler
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
ocjim, 11/27/2012 9:31:02 PM (No. 9036788)
And the clever bad guys continue to pound the dumb, and now disarrayed guys... America, increasingly the home of the Red, White and buy a clue.
Obama´s same old game is to take no position, but wait until the Republicans take a position, and then chip away. The Republicans continue to fall for this game playing over and over, like Charlie Brown trying to kick the football. If I were Boehner, I´d call a Full Stop, and call Obama on his game and demand to see his opening position. And even if the Republicans think they´ve got a good deal, it will still be same-o same-o... Tax increases will go into effect immediately and the cuts the Dems agreed to will vaporize. Twas ever thus, even in the days of Reagan and Tip O´Neill. ´Bout time for a Republican with stones to stop this non-sense... [crickets chirping...]
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
noddy, 11/27/2012 11:15:54 PM (No. 9036907)
#11, 17, 26. Me too. Must be a place with excellent affordable health care. For me, I need warmth as the cold makes my wounds from surgery ache. A place that is affordable, a place we would be welcomed. A place that has good water and healthy food. Access to places in the world where your money will be secure. And, not necessary for my well-being, but necessary for a good and safe community - a place where the people are moral and religious. Look to South and Central America. Seriously, check it out. I have for the last two years. Another surgery under Medicare and I should be out of here before summer. Good luck. I feel I have done my part, I have not been shy when others needed help. This government will not turn around in my lifetime. And just in case, I want to find a place where my children can follow. It´s not a case of running; it´s a case of looking for a decent future.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
Stopstoreload, 11/28/2012 9:03:32 PM (No. 9038498)
Blah, blah, blah! How many people who did not want Obama to win failed to go vote for Romney, who was the major party candidate opposing him? If that failure describes you, have yourself committed to an institution.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"
|
The Deafening Silence that Signals Our Demise
|
|
Townhall, by Diana West
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/5/2013 11:56:32 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Get ready for the last straw. First, though, I´d like to suggest that anyone reading this column in a local newspaper or news site pat the editor on the back for publishing what in our neo-medieval world of fear amounts to a forbidden column. Yup, I am about to say something about the Great Barack Obama Identity/Eligibility Scandal again. I know that this is one rich and urgent topic that doesn´t see the light of day in certain so-called news outlets -- and I say that from the experience of watching my own syndicated columns
|
9/11 Remains Still Found, and Still Sought
|
|
New York Times, by Jim Dwyer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/5/2013 9:48:01 AM
Post Reply
|
|
You could hear the deep breath, the pause before a conversational plunge. On the phone were Monica Gabrielle and Kristen Breitweiser. Their husbands died at the World Trade Center in the Sept. 11 attack. This week, a new effort to find remains from the site uncovered 39 pieces of what appeared to be human bones. That was the yield from the first three days of work in a process that is expected to go on for at least two months.
|
Obama Budget to Include Cuts to Programs in Hopes of Deal
|
|
New York Times, by Jackie Calmes
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/5/2013 9:00:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — President Obama next week will take the political risk of formally proposing cuts to Social Security and Medicare in his annual budget in an effort to demonstrate his willingness to compromise with Republicans and revive prospects for a long-term deficit-reduction deal, administration officials say. In a significant shift in fiscal strategy, Mr. Obama on Wednesday will send a budget plan to Capitol Hill that departs from the usual presidential wish list that Republicans typically declare dead on arrival.
|
Obama´s Gambit Raises Pressure on Boehner, Edges Washington Toward Budget Deal
|
|
National Journal, by Ron Fournier
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/5/2013 8:29:33 AM
Post Reply
|
Washington is edging closer to a budget deal, thanks to a gutsy change in strategy at the White House. Next week, President Obama will propose specific cuts to Social Security and Medicare in his annual budget, according to senior White House officials. That will put the onus on House Speaker John Boehner to show some leadership, too. He needs to push Republicans toward accepting tax increases beyond the $600 billion approved in December. It can be done. As I reported last month, Washington’s biggest myth is that a budget deal is out of reach
|
Do North Korea’s threats mask power struggle behind the scenes?
|
|
McClatchy News, by Matthew Schofield and Tom Lasseter
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/4/2013 8:08:25 AM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — The North Korean army warned the United States on Wednesday it has been cleared to wage nuclear war using “smaller, lighter and diversified weapons.” In a speech earlier in the day, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel noted that North Korea has both the nuclear weapons and the delivery system “now.” It’s the latest round in an escalation of rhetoric and actions that began with a North Korean nuclear test in February. Still, military officials and experts don’t expect North Korea to launch an attack on the United States.
|
What´s really happening in North Korea?
|
|
Politico, by Dylan Byers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/3/2013 3:29:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Two breaking news alerts came through the wire this afternoon: First, the AP sent word that Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel has called North Korea´s latest rhetoric a real, clear danger and threat to the U.S. and its allies. Within minutes, CNBC announced that the Pentagon has sent a new missile defense to Guam. The reports that followed those alerts added some meat to the storty -- "Hagel´s comments come as tensions continue to rise between North and South Korea," etc. -- but they are notably lacking in context. How serious is the threat, really? Are the North and South on the verge of war, or is this yet another bluff?
|
Menendez allies now accusing FBI of kidnapping, harassment
|
|
Daily Caller, by Charles C. Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/3/2013 3:26:29 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In a bizarre new twist to the saga of Sen. Bob Menendez and his donor-friend Salomon Melgen, members of Melgen’s circle are now hurling accusations at FBI agents investigating the pair’s relationship. During an appearance on the weekly Dominican TV show La Respuesta last week, Melgen’s uncle Vincho Castillo accused the FBI of threatening and kidnapping two of Melgen’s maids. In addition to being the Dominican Republic’s top drug cop and founder of a far right-wing political party, Vincho Castillo is also the father of Vinicito Castillo, a lawyer who allegedly participated in sex parties organized by Melgen.
|
From Lincoln to Obama, Presidents as Propagandists
|
|
National Journal, by Ron Fournier
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/2/2013 3:47:21 PM
Post Reply
|
|
My nephew’s high school government class is studying propaganda, a word most students associated with Hitler, Goebbels, and the like. “I deal with propagandists every day,” I told the class in the Detroit area last week. “They work in the White House and in Congress--Republicans and Democrats alike.” The kids were a bit surprised. “Are you calling them Nazis?” one asked. Of course not, I replied, but politicians today are using new communications tools to spread their version of the truth, much of it misleading. A smart piece by Nancy Benac of the Associated Press describes how the Obama White House “image machine” works--“serving up a stream of words, images, and videos that invariably cast the president as commanding, compassionate, and on the ball.
|
|
Will Obama’s Majority Survive?
|
|
New York Magazine, by Jonathan Chait
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/1/2013 3:11:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Since November, the prospective death of the Republican coalition has hovered over American politics, and the autopsy has gained renewed attention in light of the debates over gay marriage and immigration, both of which split the GOP from rising chunks of the electorate. I’m an advocate of the theory, first put forward a decade ago by Ruy Teixeira and John Judis, that the electorate is forming a natural Democratic majority. The Republican Party appears to be caught in a double bind, in which the electorate is growingly progressively less white, and even younger white voters hold less conservative views than older ones. What’s more, evidence suggests that voters maintain the partisan allegiances they form at a young age. The picture looks grim for the GOP.
|
West Wing Spared From Sequester Cuts, So Far
|
|
Roll Call, by Steven T. Dennis
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/1/2013 3:06:32 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The sequester doesn’t appear to have hit the West Wing of the White House particularly hard. Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters — after more than a month of dodging questions on White House effects — that 480 employees of the White House Office of Management and Budget have received furlough notices. Even that tidbit is weeks old. After Congress let the March 1 deadline pass without replacing automatic across-the-board spending cuts, executive branch agencies have been scrambling to cut their budgets and furlough employees.
|
A-Rod shows at Yankee Stadium, not worried about drug probe
|
|
New York Post, by Dan Martin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/1/2013 2:42:40 PM
Post Reply
|
Alex Rodriguez said Monday he’s not worried about a potential suspension regarding his ties to performance enhancing drugs and still intends to play for the Yankees this season.“No, I’m not,” Rodriguez said when asked if he was concerned about being targeted by MLB or a possible suspension. “But I’m not gonna further discuss this. At some point, I feel that everything will be good.”That point has not arrived. The third baseman acknowledged meeting with the league about their investigation into Biogenesis, the anti-aging clinic whose records contained Rodriguez’s name. He declined to go into details, though.
|
Betraying one of the CIA’s ‘Band of Sisters’?
|
|
Washington Post, by Marc A. Thiessen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/1/2013 2:20:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Former CIA director Mike Hayden credits “an incredible band of sisters” for the success of the operation that found and brought down Osama bin Laden. Now one of those sisters has been appointed acting chief of the CIA’s National Clandestine service. It is a major milestone for women at the CIA, the first time in the agency’s history that a female officer has headed the clandestine service. But The Post reports that CIA Director John Brennan is “hesitating” at giving her the position on a permanent basis, because of her past association with the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation (RDI) program. This is an outrage. According to several former senior CIA officials I spoke with, the officer is highly respected and unquestionably qualified for this post.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
McCain: ´I don´t understand´ GOP filibuster on guns
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Hillary Clinton Would Not ´Clear the Field´ for 2016
|
|
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Broadcasters worry about ´Zero TV´ homes
|
|
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from
|
Christians, here´s why we´re losing our religion
|
|
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|