A Message From Lucianne  



Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

Why did Obama broker
a victory for Hamas?

Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 11/25/2012 5:46:43 PM

With unusual candor, the Washington Post declares in its top headline that “Hamas’ tactics garner support” and that “Palestinians see path to victory through fighting.” This strengthening of Hamas is the entirely predictable consequence of the cease fire that the Obama administration worked to impose on Israel. Because Hamas waged war against Israel and the Israelis backed down, it is (to quote) the Post “the commonly held view in both territories (the West Bank and Gaza) that the Islamist militants of Hamas — who refuse to recognize Israel — defeated their enemy, and that they did it with weapons


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: vrb8m, 11/25/2012 5:55:42 PM     (No. 9033496)

“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

This quote comes from page 261 of the paperback edition of The Audacity of Hope.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 2 - Posted by: Cat Ballou, 11/25/2012 5:57:06 PM     (No. 9033497)

Judging from his behavior since becoming our leader, that´s a rather stupid question.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 3 - Posted by: ruready?, 11/25/2012 6:00:14 PM     (No. 9033504)

No doubt that Obama pals around with terrorists and does all that he can to orchestrate their victory. That said, having Muslim #1 make a rocket for Muslim #2 to fire off, places the odds strongly in Israel´s favor.

Netanyahu´s highest priority is finding the homes of the next set of Hamas´ leadership. Guess this is the Israeli form of affirmative action. I think Netanyahu should get the credit for this latest round of Hamas promotions.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 4 - Posted by: Grant Hodges, 11/25/2012 6:01:08 PM     (No. 9033507)

Hamas got their rear end handed to them on a stick. If that´s victory, then many happy returns.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 5 - Posted by: Judith, 11/25/2012 6:17:14 PM     (No. 9033529)

Look at his record. You won´t have to ask the question when you look at his record and listen to his words.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 6 - Posted by: woofwoofwoof, 11/25/2012 6:39:33 PM     (No. 9033558)

I´m with #4, I usually like Mirengoff but he´s way off on this one.

The Arabs always declare victory, no matter what happens. I´m sure Saddam is still celebrating in Hades.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 7 - Posted by: clayusmcret, 11/25/2012 6:44:25 PM     (No. 9033562)

obama´s muslim upbringing makes him sympathetic to Hamas. Less so to democracy and our republic.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 8 - Posted by: glcinpdx, 11/25/2012 6:51:32 PM     (No. 9033568)

To paraphrase Flip Wilson´s ´Geraldine´, "The Devil/Mohammad made him do it"...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 9 - Posted by: jeffreyabigail, 11/25/2012 8:01:56 PM     (No. 9033621)

#4 is correct, Israel shot down their missiles, destroyed the Hamas headquarters, killed a couple of key thugs, and hit other targets. Hamas killed I believe five Israelis. This was a victory for Israel, but they should have kept bombing for another week.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 10 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 11/25/2012 8:06:49 PM     (No. 9033626)

Because he -Obama- has absolutely no idea, none whatsoever of what he is doing, that´s why. It´s not mysterious and it is not especially sinister. There are no secrets, no malevolent agendas, no sophisticated schemes to work evil. Not at all. It is incredibly simple. Obama and people who think like him are utter, militant, incorrigible fools. That´s all there is to it. I know it is tempting to construct more interesting and elaborate theories to explain their irrational and destructive behaviors and their bizarre theories. I have spent much time dwelling upon such complexities myself, before concluding that, as usual, the simplest explanation is the best. Those people -Obama and his faithful followers- are hopeless fools. Our best hope is that the inevitable consequences of their militant folly will awaken enough American sleepers and dreamers to prevent the re-election of such ridiculously incompetent people. It will hurt, but it may perhaps be instructive. For as Aeschylus noted long ago, "We suffer into truth."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 11 - Posted by: JAN, 11/25/2012 8:32:35 PM     (No. 9033648)


I´m with #4

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 12 - Posted by: Rubinski, 11/25/2012 8:38:42 PM     (No. 9033657)

Why did Obama do it? Because, as #10 states, Obama is clueless.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 13 - Posted by: horacer, 11/25/2012 8:47:03 PM     (No. 9033663)

If Hamas isn´t defeated and forced to capitulate they win. Bibi handed Hamas victory. If you leave the smuggling routes open you lose. Netanyahu should have told Hillary that electricity, fuel, food and medicine shipments to Gaza would cease until the tunnels were shut and the Sinai - Gaza border was secured in a way that no weapons could enter. He stopped nothing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 14 - Posted by: Udanja99, 11/25/2012 10:57:39 PM     (No. 9033750)

Because 0bama is EVIL.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 15 - Posted by: Garage Logician, 11/25/2012 11:42:29 PM     (No. 9033773)

Oh! Oh! I know this one! It´s because Baby Doc Obama is an anticolonialist just like Daddy, and a Muslim just like StepDaddy! He has so many daddy issues, one would think he earned his living upside down on a stripper pole.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 16 - Posted by: bumbleshorts, 11/26/2012 4:49:12 AM     (No. 9033862)

"Why did obama broker a victory for Hamas?"

Hundreds of rockets slam into Israel and obama says not one single word. Israel mobilizes to attack Hamas, obama goes into overdrive to broker a ceasefire...plus give Hamas even more of American´s money.

You do the math.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 17 - Posted by: Grambo, 11/26/2012 8:04:18 AM     (No. 9033984)

Ask the Egyptians and Libyans how well it worked out for them when Obama stepped in to help. With a friend like Obama…

  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 18 - Posted by: Rinktum, 11/26/2012 8:04:48 AM     (No. 9033985)

Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood have been emboldened by Obama´s reelection. They know they have a friend in Obama and Mrs. Clinton. Israel also knows that Obama is not to be trusted. Obama´s policies have created chaos in the Middle East. It is more volatile and the bad guys seem to have the upper hand. Some may believe that Obama is incompotent, but I believe he knows exactly what he is doing. He is on a mission to destroy us economically, militarily, and so weaken our influence on the world stage that we will not be able to support our ally Israel. The die is cast and this will not end well for anyone.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 19 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 11/26/2012 8:33:43 AM     (No. 9034019)

Because Obama doesn´t want to help Israel against Iran.

Israel escalates toward Hamas, and Iran gets involved. Then Barcky is stuck, obligated to Israel but without his heart in it.

He could have handled Iran years ago, and CHOSE NOT TO. Pressure now keeps up aligned with Israel, but not because he wants to be. Full-blown out war between Israel and Iran would necessarily bring us in, and in Barcky´s mind, on the wrong side.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 20 - Posted by: M2, 11/26/2012 8:34:36 AM     (No. 9034022)

#10, respectfully, you underestimate them. They know precisely what they are doing and are not "fools". The agenda is nothing less than the Islamization of America (and the world), and efforts toward that end are remarkably successful so far.

People understimate Obama and his puppeteers at their own peril. The outrageousness of their actions against America in the past 4 years will get even more outrageous. This IS a "sinister" plan. Many writers and others have warned us about it and if we ignore creeping Sharia Law, we deserve what we get.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 21 - Posted by: Holeymoses, 11/26/2012 8:40:25 AM     (No. 9034030)

An article in Pravda notes that Obama won the illiterate vote.
interesting how the Russians can see it so plainly.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 22 - Posted by: LZK, 11/26/2012 9:01:33 AM     (No. 9034051)

Ahhhhh --- I wouldn´t count BiBi out -- yet....

He got an improved defense shield from the deal. I suspect that´s what he wanted all along....

Go -- Moosad!!


  Click Here if you Like this Comment



Reply 23 - Posted by: planetgeo, 11/26/2012 9:11:18 AM     (No. 9034065)

I´m sorry but the argument that it´s all due to incompetence and cluelessness just doesn´t hold up. Just look at the evidence. If it were simple incompetence, you would expect some random positive results every now and then. That never has happened. In every single case, his actions help our enemies (Hamas, Iran, Syria, etc.) and damage both us and our allies. Such consistency would not be the case with simple incompetence.

No. Based on all the evidence it´s indisputably willful and deliberate.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 24 - Posted by: pineledger, 11/26/2012 9:17:30 AM     (No. 9034070)

24, and if we doubt your theory, just have a look at the stellar "investments" Zippy made with the stimulus $$. Name one winner.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 25 - Posted by: Flyball dogs, 11/26/2012 9:29:47 AM     (No. 9034089)

M2 and planetgeo speak for me.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 26 - Posted by: Aegedius, 11/26/2012 9:29:58 AM     (No. 9034090)

Nobody won, but perhaps Israel is winning. Hamas ran out of rockets and bombs and agreed to a "truce" until Iran can re-supply them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 27 - Posted by: caddyjak, 11/26/2012 9:42:03 AM     (No. 9034108)

The Republican Party owes it to American to invoke the 12th Amendment rule and elect Romney.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 28 - Posted by: shurnuff, 11/26/2012 9:43:38 AM     (No. 9034111)

Has anyone else noticed that wherever obama and hillary stick their noses in, the place goes to pieces fast?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 29 - Posted by: larryp, 11/26/2012 10:09:20 AM     (No. 9034156)

I hnk Obama wants Netanyahu out. First the war and then all the screeds abour how Israel lost. Next will be a small party pulling out of Netanyahu coalition.
Prob Code Pink is over there now. code Pink and the Goog ex VP spent months in Egypt undermining Mubarak

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 30 - Posted by: RancherJack, 11/26/2012 10:49:27 AM     (No. 9034217)

Obama is the anti-Christ

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 31 - Posted by: peterfleming, 11/26/2012 11:23:09 AM     (No. 9034282)

Gambling wih your money, unlicensed broker with no legitimate documents proving his qualifications to lose your money. Add to that craziness, his adherence to several totalitarian ideologies. More like a witch doctor; the flavor of the day is what you get. With the largest promise of freebies since Hitler, he has people stumbling over themselves to hand over to him their once precious votes. And his Himler is telling the people they don´t even have to be qualified for voting either. It feels like Mel Brooks wrote and composed all of this crazed garbage, and he´s trying to top his earlier PRODUCERS smash hit show-within-a--show...remember ? SPRINGTIME FOR HITLER !

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 32 - Posted by: paulfromTexas, 11/26/2012 11:26:40 AM     (No. 9034293)

He, like all good muhammedans, does as the Mullah says to do.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 33 - Posted by: trapper, 11/26/2012 1:29:43 PM     (No. 9034502)

Why did Obama broker this?

Elsewhere Dr. Krauthammer asks a similar question: "Why was there war in Gaza?" See:


Perhaps the answer is in this article in the Tribune:


"Hamas will seek $1 billion in reconstruction aid from the Arab world and international community to help rebuild the Gaza Strip,"

Whenever we are left scratching our heads trying to figure out why in the world someone did something that made no sense, had no apparent purpose, and yielded no identifiable benefit to anyone, the answer invariably is that they made money from it. Does anyone really think anything will be rebuilt once Hamas gets the cash? Seriously? Was the whole thing just an elaborate ruse to set up a money grab afterward? Was Obama in on the charade, just like the youtube video fairy tale?

I´ve gotten SO cynical.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 34 - Posted by: stealthy, 11/26/2012 1:35:52 PM     (No. 9034517)

I know whose side God is on so it doesn´t matter what Obama does, maybe he is the anti-christ?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 35 - Posted by: JustCause, 11/26/2012 1:37:44 PM     (No. 9034521)

The correct answer is a liberal quantity of ´Pass the Doobie´...

Has anyone ever seen the pResident eat with his left hand? Just wondering...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Post Reply   Close thread 713272

Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

House GOP sets first vote
to hold Lois Lerner in
contempt over IRS targeting
Washington Times, by Stephen Dinan    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/3/2014 10:25:39 PM     Post Reply
House Republicans have scheduled a vote next week to hold Lois G. Lerner in contempt of Congress for refusing to testify about her role in the Internal Revenue Service’s tea party targeting scandal, setting up a major battle over constitutional rights versus Congress‘ ability to oversee the government. Rep. Darrell E. Issa, the House’s top investigator, said Thursday that as a senior official at the center of the IRS targeting, Ms. Lerner will either talk or face penalties for refusing to help the committee get to the bottom of who orchestrated the targeting and what the motives were. “Ms. Lerner’s

Kerry’s folly, Chapter 3
Washington Post, by Charles Krauthammer    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/3/2014 10:10:14 PM     Post Reply
When has a secretary of state been involved in so many disastrous, self-initiated negotiations? First, John Kerry convenes — against all advice and holding no cards — Geneva negotiations to resolve the Syria conflict and supposedly remove Bashar al-Assad from power. The talks collapse in acrimony and confusion. Kerry’s response? A second Geneva conference that — surprise! — breaks up in acrimony and confusion. Then, even as Russian special forces are taking over Crimea, Kerry goes chasing after Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov — first to Paris, then Rome, then London — offering a diplomatic “offramp.” Lavrov shrugs him off.

With Israeli-Palestinian peace
talks faltering, Kerry must
decide how to proceed
Washington Post, by Karen DeYoung and Anne Gearan    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/3/2014 10:07:22 PM     Post Reply
When his aides get discouraged about the prospects for Middle East peace, Secretary of State John F. Kerry often bucks them up with a phrase: “Don’t be afraid to be caught trying.” But as his tireless efforts to broker Israeli-Palestinian negotiations hit bottom Thursday, with Israel’s cancellation of prisoner releases that were considered crucial to keeping the talks alive, there are some around Kerry — including on his senior staff and inside the White House — who believe the time is approaching for him to say, “Enough.” Kerry risks being seen as trying too hard at the expense of a

Leftists apoplectic over SCOTUS
free speech ruling in McCutcheon
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/3/2014 7:41:38 AM     Post Reply
The American left is outraged that the Supreme Court has voted 5 to 4 that limits to the aggregate amount of donations to federal campaigns have been found unconstitutional. Prior to the ruling, there was a 123,200 limit ($48,600 for candidates and $74,600 in contributions to PACs) on the total amount a single donor could contribute in a two year federal campaign cycle. The ruling did not affect the existing $2,600 limit on the maximum donation to any Congressional campaign. As you might have already guessed, Harry Reid had the most predictable reaction, invoking the Koch Brothers. “The Supreme Court today

Obama shifts focus back to
minimum wage increase
in Michigan visit
Washington Times, by Ben Wolfgang and Dave Boyer    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/2/2014 10:12:15 PM     Post Reply
ANN ARBOR, Mich. — Trying to put Obamacare’s problems behind him, President Obama renewed his election-year push for an increase in the minimum wage Wednesday and the White House urged fellow Democrats to latch on to the issue for their own political gain. Speaking at the University of Michigan, the president again fiercely advocated for a rise in the nation’s minimum wage, trying to keep the issue front and center as the November midterm elections creep closer. “In America, we don’t believe in opportunity for a few — we believe that everybody should have a chance at success,” Mr. Obama

Compromise on smaller minimum
wage hike is nonstarter
Washington Post, by Greg Sargent    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/2/2014 10:09:11 PM     Post Reply
President Obama campaigned in Michigan with Dem Senate candidate Gary Peters, making the case for a hike in the federal minimum wage to $10.10. Unfortunately, the wrangling in the Senate today suggests the idea is going to die. Senator Susan Collins has said she’s trying to craft a bipartisan compromise on the minimum wage that could win Republican support — a compromise that would require hiking the minimum wage to an unspecified point below the $10.10 per hour that Obama and Democrats want. Today Harry Reid ruled out the idea, insisting that Dems won’t agree to anything below $10.10. In

Congress must stem the
flow of campaign cash in
wake of ‘McCutcheon’
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/2/2014 10:04:55 PM     Post Reply
THE SUPREME Court on Wednesday overturned yet another federal law meant to check corruption and influence-peddling in national politics. The ruling shows two things: The Roberts Court’s destructive view on these matters wasn’t changed by the backlash to its Citizens United holding, and Congress must respond by designing new rules that can pass the court’s overly skeptical review. If lawmakers tackle the issue forthrightly, they have some workable options. The court eliminated an overall limit on how much donors could give to candidates, parties and various other committees over the course of an election cycle. The idea had been to

Obama jabs press:
Future HealthCare.gov
outages ‘won’t be news’
The Hill [Washington DC], by Jonathan Easley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/2/2014 7:57:09 AM     Post Reply
President Obama expressed the White House’s frustration with news coverage of the Affordable Care Act’s rocky rollout by taking a jab at the press on Tuesday. During his ObamaCare enrollment victory lap speech in the Rose Garden, the president swiped at reporters, who the White House believes were too eager to spotlight every incremental development associated with the site´s botched launch. “I want to make sure everybody understands – in the months, years ahead, I guarantee you there will be additional challenges to implementing this law,” Obama said. “There will be days when the website stumbles. I guarantee it. So

Obama TD Dance a
Poor Strategy for Dems
Commentary Magazine, by Jonathan S.Tobin    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/1/2014 9:05:57 PM     Post Reply
The White House is claiming that President Obama’s celebratory speech this afternoon in the Rose Garden was not a “victory lap” but it was clear to everyone who watched the address that it was more of a touchdown dance than a sober evaluation of the implementation of his signature health care law. Given the mistake-filled rollout of ObamaCare, the fact that the numbers reported by the government indicated that it had exceeded the seven million goal that had been set as the goal for the open enrollment period, the administration felt it had good reason to spike the ball and

The Most Un-American Speech
Barack Obama Has Ever Delivered
PJ Media, by Bryan Preston    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/1/2014 8:18:49 PM     Post Reply
Before getting to the speech itself, it’s worth noting a few things. When the Democrats passed and Barack Obama signed Obamacare, the majority opposed it. About 56%, in fact. A majority have consistently opposed that law ever since. The Obama administration touted 7 million sign-ups by March 31 as “success.” When that goal appeared to be unreachable, the administration suggested that maybe 5 or 6 million would be enough. Now, as if by magic, they have their number. Somehow. All along, the administration has touted false numbers of enrollees. All along, the administration has neglected to admit that Obamacare is

CIA officer confirmed no
protests before misleading
Benghazi account given
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 3/31/2014 10:07:09 PM     Post Reply
Before the Obama administration gave an inaccurate narrative on national television that the Benghazi attacks grew from an anti-American protest, the CIA’s station chief in Libya pointedly told his superiors in Washington that no such demonstration occurred, documents and interviews with current and former intelligence officials show. The attack was “not an escalation of protests,” the station chief wrote to then-Deputy CIA Director Michael J. Morell in an email dated Sept. 15, 2012 — a full day before the White House sent Susan E. Rice to several Sunday talk shows to disseminate talking points claiming that the Benghazi attack began

Social conservatives are
mobilizing in France, leading
to talk of a tea party
Washington Post, by Anthony Faiola    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 3/31/2014 10:02:04 PM     Post Reply
PARIS — Steeped in conservative rage and tasting of grass roots, a political backlash has traditional politicians and the news media asking the once-unthinkable: Is le tea party brewing in France? If it were, it would be populated by the likes of Catherine Mas-Mezeran, a Parisian mother of three who wrinkles her nose at the mention of President François Hollande. She calls him “the Socialist,” which, technically, he is. But if President Obama had the birthers, Hollande now has the baptismists. Like others in a growing movement here, she firmly believes an unsubstantiated rumor emanating from conservative circles that Hollande

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Obama calls GOP budget plan
a ‘stinkburger’

55 replie(s)
Washington Post, by David Nakamura    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 4/2/2014 5:30:08 PM     Post Reply
ANN ARBOR, Mich. – President Obama compared the Republican budget plan to a "stinkburger" or "meanwich" during a speech here Wednesday, using a series of zingers in an attempt to strike a contrast with the GOP on economic issues in an election year. In a speech to an enthusiastic crowd of 1,400 at the University of Michigan, Obama repeatedly mocked Republican ideas about how to improve the economy, as he touted his own proposal to raise the minimum wage. Obama, who visited the local Zingerman´s deli before the speech, said that Republican proposals to cut taxes for wealthier Americans and

CEO of Firefox maker Mozilla steps down
36 replie(s)
USA Today, by Brett Molina    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 4/3/2014 4:06:40 PM     Post Reply
Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich will step down following uproar over his apparent opposition to gay marriage. In a statement released Thursday, Mozilla -- which makes the Firefox Web browser -- apologized for not reacting more quickly to the controversy surrounding Eich, who made a 2008 donation supporting California´s plan on gay marriage, The Guardian reports. "We know why people are hurt and angry, and they are right: it´s because we haven´t stayed true to ourselves," said Mozilla executive chairwoman Mitchell Baker in a statement. Last week, Eich attempted to dispel fears on whether he would support equality as the head

Massive Voter Fraud Discovered
in North Carolina’s 2012 Election

34 replie(s)
PJ Media, by Bryan Preston    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/2/2014 7:17:55 PM     Post Reply
The North Carolina State Board of Elections has found thousands of instances of voter fraud in the state, thanks to a 28-state crosscheck of voter rolls. Initial findings suggest widespread election fraud. 765 voters with an exact match of first and last name, DOB and last four digits of SSN were registered in N.C. and another state and voted in N.C. and the other state in the 2012 general election. 35,750 voters with the same first and last name and DOB were registered in N.C. and another state and voted in both states in the 2012 general election. 155,692 voters

Sources on ground during
Benghazi attack slam ex-CIA
boss Morell’s testimony

29 replie(s)
Fox News, by Adam Housley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/2/2014 9:19:40 PM     Post Reply
Sources on the ground in Benghazi during the 2012 terror attack are pushing back hard on former CIA acting director Mike Morell´s testimony on Capitol Hill, where he defended his role in shaping the administration´s narrative and claimed politics were not involved. As part of Morell´s testimony on Wednesday, the former acting and deputy CIA director acknowledged that he overruled the guidance of the top CIA officer in Libya at the time. That official told Morell the attack was not an "escalation of protests," but Morell said he had to weigh that against analysts who concluded the opposite. He ultimately went

North Carolina drivers to
be charged by the mile?

29 replie(s)
WTVD-TV [Raleigh-Durham, NC], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/3/2014 6:40:07 AM     Post Reply
Big changes could be just down the road for North Carolina drivers. A proposal is in the works that would change the state tax system to charge drivers by the mile, instead of at the gas pump.The proposal would be to charge a half cent per mile for cars, which would generate almost $500 million in annual state revenue. A driver who travelled 15,000 miles in a year would pay about $75. "Basically you pay per the mile. It´s treating transportation as a utility, much like your water and sewer," said Larry Goode, with the Institute of Transportation Research and
Source corrected by Staff

David Letterman makes big announcement
27 replie(s)
CBS News, by Lauren Moraski    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 4/3/2014 5:00:45 PM     Post Reply
It´s the end of an era: David Letterman announced Thursday that he´s retiring from CBS´ "Late Show" sometime next year. He made that announcement during the taping of his program this afternoon. The late-night talk show host, who will celebrate his 67th birthday next week, made his debut on the "Late Show" on Aug. 30, 1993. Letterman got his television start in 1978 on the CBS variety series "Mary," starring Mary Tyler Moore. Months later, he paid his first visit to "The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson" -- marking the first of 22 appearances. He also guest-hosted "Tonight" numerous times.

Dem Rep.: ‘Members of Congress
Are Underpaid,’ Can’t Afford
to ‘Live Decently’

27 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Josh Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/3/2014 7:15:42 PM     Post Reply
Do you think members of Congress are overpaid or underpaid? Most likely you’d go with the former, but Democratic congressman Jim Moran argues it’s actually the latter. In an interview with CQ Roll Call, Moran says, “I think the American people should know that the members of Congress are underpaid.” The House recently took up a bill to freeze members’ paychecks, placing another halt on the annual cost-of-living pay increases they would normally get and keeping annual salary at $174,000. Moran believes that this is the wrong way to go, not necessarily talking about himself in particular, but saying there

5 Reasons Why Republicans
Should Say No to Jeb 2016

25 replie(s)
Daily Beast, by Myra Adams    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 4/2/2014 6:39:16 AM     Post Reply
With Chris Christie in deep trouble, Republican poobahs are reportedly looking to Jeb Bush to save their party in 2016. The former two-term governor of Florida speaks fluent Spanish, is a convert to Catholicism, and has high name recognition. Jeb could raise millions of dollars over night by just saying “yes” to running. Despite all this, there are strong reasons Republicans should say no to him. 1. His last name is poison. Let’s face it, if Jeb Bush had the last name of Something Else he would have already run for president in 2008 or 2012. According to a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll registered voters were asked if they would definitely NOT vote for Jeb Bush and 50 percent said they would not.

The GOP faithful should
give Jeb Bush a hearing

25 replie(s)
Washington Post, by George F. Will    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 4/2/2014 11:20:56 PM     Post Reply
The human kindling that makes up the flammable Republican base may soon burst into flames, again. Portions of that excitable cohort are looking — some with fawn-like eyes filled with hurt, others with sparks shooting from eyes narrowed like gun slits — askance at other Republicans urging Jeb Bush to seek the 2016 presidential nomination. A candidacy by Florida’s former governor would be desirable. But if Republicans want to avoid intra-party carnage, they should be very careful about doing what The Post recently reported: “Many of the Republican Party’s most powerful insiders and financiers have begun a behind-the-scenes campaign to draft

Defense Secretary ´Looking´ at Banning
Tobacco Sales at Military Installations

24 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/2/2014 5:23:20 AM     Post Reply
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is "looking" at banning the sale of tobacco at military installations. According to one military publication, Hagel appears to support it. "As the Navy considers banning tobacco sales on all bases and ships, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel gave a strong endorsement of the review Monday, and suggested that he would be in favor of a ban," reports Stars and Stripes. “I don’t know if there’s anybody in America who still thinks that tobacco is good for you,” Stars and Stripes quotes Hagel as saying. “We don’t allow smoking in any of our government buildings. Restaurants, states, [and]

Sarah Palin Continues to Discredit Herself
24 replie(s)
Commentary Magazine, by Peter Wehner    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/2/2014 2:45:34 PM     Post Reply
Sarah Palin continues to act in ways that confirm some of the more negative things said about her. For example, she’s taken to Facebook to attack the most recent budget plan by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan.(Snip)Whatever differences Ms. Palin may have with the Ryan plan–and perhaps she’ll take the time to offer an actual critique of if rather than a Facebook entry with lots of upper case words–it’s hardly a joke. But what might elicit a roll of the eyes is comparing Ms. Palin’s views now versus what they were nearly four years ago. Consider this: On December

Harry Reid on Koch Brothers:
‘Shadow Billionaires’ Spending
to ‘Rig Our Political System’

24 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Penny Starr    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/3/2014 6:02:21 PM     Post Reply
At a press conference to push legislation to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 an hour, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) criticized industrialists David and Charles Koch, calling them “shadow billionaires” who use their wealth to “rig our political system.” Reid’s sharp comments come on a day when the Wall Street Journal published a commentary written by Charles Koch, in which he described the brothers’ decision to get involved in politics to preserve the individual freedom and free markets that he said are the pillars of the American republic. “These two men are a pair of shadow billionaires spending

Post Reply   Close thread 713272

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.