 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
How the Implementation of Obamacare Will Make the GOP a Majority Party
PJ Media, by Rick Moran
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 11/24/2012 3:04:59 PM
|
| As we get closer to the day when Obamacare moves from threat to reality, it seems probable that the resulting catastrophe for tens of thousands of businesses, as well as the massive increase in premiums for many families, will propel Republicans to majority status in 2014. How many businesses will be forced to close shop? How many will cut back on the number of employees to stay in business? How many will refuse to expand, unable to handle the increased costs? How many jobs will Obamacare cost? Michael Tanner, senior fellow at the Cato Institute,
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 11/24/2012 3:09:52 PM (No. 9032131)
`Will Make the GOP a Majority Party`. Not sure if that is supposed to be a good thing....
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
youngtexan, 11/24/2012 3:13:55 PM (No. 9032133)
The problem is that the GOP caves in with the Dems all the time. Since they can´t stand their grounds, they won´t be a Majority Party anytime soon or ever.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
enuf8, 11/24/2012 3:19:15 PM (No. 9032139)
Some of those shrilling for universal heath care with a substantial income from either one of two contributing were actually believing they would get FREE heath care and be able to eliminate health care from their personal budget. Some of these bragged about their college degrees. Like Gen. Honoree said, "Stuck on Stupid".
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 11/24/2012 3:24:39 PM (No. 9032143)
Let the Dims loose on the American public. They voted for it and they deserve it.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Ranger Applejack Dawson, 11/24/2012 3:26:30 PM (No. 9032146)
YUP #1
The only difference between the Republican Party and the Democrats is that when the Republicans run the country the decline is a steep downward slope.
When Democrats are in control the country is in free fall.
Under Bush, the NATIONAL DEBT increased by $5Trillion in 8 years. Under Obama, the NATIONAL DEBT increased $6Trilion in 4 years.
They are both just politicians.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 11/24/2012 3:46:45 PM (No. 9032163)
Some of you don´t believe that the loss of 800,000 jobs will convince voters that there is a difference between Democrats and Republicans? Want to bet? I think that will convince even you.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 11/24/2012 3:59:24 PM (No. 9032183)
Let ´em own it !
Let´s get out of the way and just let ´em do it.
Let´s not get blamed for the whole failure for holding out on the last 2%.
They must have NO CHANCE to blame the coming crash on us.
Make ´em smoke the whole damn pack.
Vote "Present".
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Cat Ballou, 11/24/2012 3:59:50 PM (No. 9032184)
If you are already feeding at the trough why would you care if 800,000 jobs are lost? One of the stupid women picketing Hostess said she was glad they were going out of business, you can´t talk to someone that ignorant & get anything accomplished.
Until the hyperinflation hits & a trailer load of Obama money won´t buy a nail wrap or pack of cigarettes, you´re not going to get the masses to pay attention. And the masses are at "tipping" point of 50%....!! Scary.... & very very sad!!
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
DJ51, 11/24/2012 4:03:31 PM (No. 9032190)
#6 I Do not think so. A dumbed down electorate that easily responded to slick liberal campaign marketing, during a disastorous presidency, will still not notice the devastation. Even if they did, the Dems will successfully blame republicans.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
harleynyc, 11/24/2012 4:05:13 PM (No. 9032193)
Won´t happen. The GOP hasn´t got the spine to stop democrat voter fraud. Civil war is the only option, and it´s up to us.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
dr.lakerman, 11/24/2012 4:06:04 PM (No. 9032197)
#5, I respect president george w. bush alot, and believe the historians, a few decades out, will rate him highly. But he did spend too much money, with no child left behind, and with rx coverage in medicare. both of those were passed with the best of intentions. Neither should have been passed in the form each took. But 9/11/01 put incredible burdens on the president, who had to put protecting Americans at the top of his ´to do´ list. And in the process of protecting us, spending went kind of crazy. But he protected us.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Pearson365, 11/24/2012 4:16:28 PM (No. 9032214)
The more ObamaCare fails, the more Obama and Dems will blame the health care insurers, physicians and employers who provide coverage for their employees. Assuming that Obama does not ignore Constitution, he will have Michelle run in order to complete his illusionary plan to provide every American coverage, "We can´t let the wealthy get the good care. We gotta make sure that the poor black kid in Harlem gets the same care as those fat cats on Wall Street." He & she will call for nationalizing health insurers and putting all doctors in federal civil service. The two grifters will advocate making things worse in order to presumably make it better.
In 2015-16, Michelle and Hillary will be locked in a vicious Democratic primary battle centered on who can best provide nationalized health, dental and long-term care. The GOP will hopefully have a candidate who can counter this madness, but at the moment, I do not know who.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Daisymay, 11/24/2012 4:17:45 PM (No. 9032215)
The "Takers" won´t even notice if 800,000 workers get laid off. The "Takers" will still get all their Freebies. It won´t affect their lifestyle at all. Until the Free Phones, Food Stamps, Rent Subsidies, Free heat, and whatever else the government is giving out these days, stops...and we all know that won´t happen because Democrats do not want to upset their BASE...UNTIL it stops...nothing will upset the "Takers". They are growing by the day and by 2016, they will once again grow in numbers and they WILL VOTE to protect their FREEBIES! I don´t see how Republicans will EVER be able to fight their way back to being the Majority unless they come up with Bus loads of Illegals from some foreign country who would agree to vote Republican on election day because we provided them each with a $100 Bill after they vote!
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Spidey, 11/24/2012 4:37:10 PM (No. 9032232)
The reason liberalism has continued so long in this country is they more or less left the golden goose alone while they found ways to nickle and dime it while thriving themselves. Then along comes Obama intent on destroying the golden goose,blowing $800 billion in stimulus and passing health that will cost $500 billion a year in totality with no way to pay for it.
People have conditioned themselves to survive without a job the past 4 years which is incredible in itself. I can´t think of a way to survive without a job,what´s the secret?
Obamacare is a disincentive to work if you can get free healthcare while doing nothing.If you file taxes,you´ll be paying a fine or premium you can´t afford. This means people will stop filing tax returns.If you have a $600 refund coming and the fine is $1200,then why file and fork out an additional $600?
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
chumley, 11/24/2012 4:40:30 PM (No. 9032238)
They may get their majority. What will they do with it? If the past is any indication (and it always is), they will do nothing useful with it. They will appease their good friends across the aisle, they will shudder in fear at threatened but never carried out filibusters, and they will continue our decline. Fool me once.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Cat Ballou, 11/24/2012 4:41:01 PM (No. 9032240)
"We can´t let the wealthy get the good care. We gotta make sure that the poor black kid in Harlem gets the same care as those fat cats on Wall Street." He & she will call for nationalizing health insurers and putting all doctors in federal civil service.
If this happens, how does this part of Obamacare pertain? Are we to assume those poor Congressman are not wealthy? If they weren´t when they got to Washington I would imagine most of them are by the time they leave, that is if they ever do leave. Then they can become a lobbyist.......!!!
> "Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members > of Congress."
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Pinchem, 11/24/2012 4:47:05 PM (No. 9032247)
Sometimes, when I´m sittin round doin nuthin, just doin nuthin while sittin round, I sometimes ponder....we killed communist in Korea. We killed communist in Vietnam. We killed communist in Bosnia.
Why do those same Rules of Engagement not apply here? Just wonderin.
Maybe we should make THEM wonder about that.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
gesundheit, 11/24/2012 5:15:01 PM (No. 9032282)
If Obama and the Democrats thought ObamaCare would benefit the economy and make everyone happy, they wouldn´t have postponed its implementation until after the 2012 election.
And if they had thought raising taxes on the rich would also help the economy, they could have done so when the Democrats had a majority in Congress during Obama´s first two years in office.
So it isn´t only Republicans who believe ObamaCare and the repeal of the Bush tax cuts will hurt the economy, the Democrats have shown that they believe it, too.
In order to win the presidency and then re-election, Obama had to energize the Democrats´ liberal base with promises of free universal health care, etc., while stirring up class-warfare anger with promises of taxing the rich.
That´s why ObamaCare and the repeal of the Bush tax cuts will soon be upon us -- NOT because Obama and the Democrats thought they would be good for the country.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
rabbit, 11/24/2012 5:18:02 PM (No. 9032285)
The GOP fools itself if it believes people will turn back to them just because of problems with Obamacare. Those who voted for Obama want to see some sort of coverage for those who can´t afford any type of insurance and those who have pre-existing conditions and have thus been forced out of the insurance market.
Medical pricing is horribly distorted by the current medical insurance system in the US. Those with good insurance get discount pricing because the insurance companies have negotiated large-scale discounts. The most expensive medical care is reserved for those who have no choice but to pay 100% out-of-pocket without access to those discounts. That causes people to avoid medical services until the situation is dire, at which time ER´s and hospitals are forced to care for much sicker individuals.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
jalo1951, 11/24/2012 5:19:11 PM (No. 9032287)
Thanks to obamacare I will be losing my health insurance on Jan, 1. My premiums were to double which would have been a third of my salary. One third going to taxes and another third going to taxes doesn´t leave much when you really don´t have a big paycheck to begin with. No raises for the past two years and probably none in the future.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
LadyHen, 11/24/2012 5:19:26 PM (No. 9032288)
The people that voted for Obama DON´T WANT JOBS. They want free stuff from the government because the world owes them.
No amount of job loss will do any good. I repeat, they don´t want jobs. They want to live in the projects having baby after baby and getting Obamaphones and groceries and healthcare from Uncle Sam OR living in their boomer parent´s basement forever playing games and watching TV and having mommy and daddy buy them everything from underwear to iPhones. They have no motivation, no incentive, no need to improve, no nothing. They are a generation of perpetual adolescent nothings hell bent on staying nothing and they see nothing wrong with being nothing. THESE nothings are the empty suit´s constituency and he is more than happy to drain us all dry to support these nothings for their votes until they and we die.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Coy860, 11/24/2012 5:20:59 PM (No. 9032289)
Why is there no court challenge to the Obamacare "waivers"? What happened to Equal Protection Under the Law?
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
bpl40, 11/24/2012 5:31:39 PM (No. 9032301)
Unless the current GOP cleans up or is forced to do so, I am not interested in it becoming the majority party anymore. the #1 clean up issue is to get leadership that is totally loyal to the Constitution and is in resonance with the conservative grassroots and their ideology. Currently I don´t see anyone but Sarah.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
bighambone, 11/24/2012 5:32:03 PM (No. 9032302)
The majority of the people out there who re-elected Obama believe that he is going to provide them with "free" health care and a lot of other taxpayer provided benefits and services.
As long as Obama tells them that he is doing "the best that he can" in the face of Republican intransigence, those people will come out again and vote for an Obama clone, or whoever Obama directs them to vote for in 2014-2016.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 11/24/2012 5:38:14 PM (No. 9032306)
If these masses wanted more and more babies we wouldn´t be facing free abortions for all and more for the 47.5%. They want to revisit the free love for all era and no responsibility as taught them by the originals of the 60´s generation. perhaps when that group has passed on sanity may be back in style.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
snakeoil, 11/24/2012 5:39:17 PM (No. 9032307)
Just another 800,000 on Food Stamps and playing with their ØDumbø phones. We aren´t going to get back to majority party until only taxpayers are allowed to vote. And that could only happen with a revolution.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
pickle1, 11/24/2012 6:07:25 PM (No. 9032328)
Is this a joke?
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Straitpath, 11/24/2012 6:36:31 PM (No. 9032364)
The comments under the original post are very interesting and educational.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
killerbee, 11/24/2012 6:49:00 PM (No. 9032373)
Yeah, right. And the leftist media has no power. We´ll get ´em next time.
I´m sick of it. We saw blatant fraud this time along with outrageous bias in the media and in the debate system. Has anyone in the GOP done a thing to combat it? Nope.
So, yeah, this is the thing that´s going to wake the Obama electorate up. Are you kidding? They´re stupid. They´re thralls to the Democrat party. They believe the Republicans brought up contraception and abortion and such in the election.
Until we get serious about exposing and combating/shaming fraud, we will never win another election they don´t want us to win.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
suedotsue, 11/24/2012 7:10:35 PM (No. 9032396)
Mr. Moran is disingenuous at best. When we gave the GOP the people to defund ObamaCare Moran was describing us as dirty fingernailed hicks who would never be accepted by GOP establishment. Moran is just filler between so-called elections.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Quigley, 11/24/2012 8:41:57 PM (No. 9032457)
Back during hillarycare, Phil Graham said if it got implemented people would be hunting dimocrats with dogs.
It may still be the case. While it seems nothing matters to the electorate, if it turns out teleprompter care inconveniences them then they will hate it.
Death of an ambassador, no big deal. Inconvenienced or charged $2.00 for an ATM transaction, moral outrage!!
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
KTWO, 11/24/2012 8:50:14 PM (No. 9032461)
I expect ObamaCare will be as effective as gun control and drug control and border control. And the thousand entitlement programs at every level, city, county, state, and federal.
And like the millions of shovel ready jobs the stimulus has produced.
And the tremendous benefits we have enjoyed from wind power and solar and electric cars because our government subsidized them with billions of dollars, trillions over the years.
And our public schools, the most expensive on Earth, whose graduates amaze us all.
Government does not run things well. Being government means they don´t have too.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
montanabound, 11/24/2012 9:15:24 PM (No. 9032481)
#21 is right. My son sees that attitude in his middle school students. No ambition.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
KimoSaavy, 11/24/2012 10:40:50 PM (No. 9032558)
Obamacare was a perjorative against the law. Now BO and the dems have stolen the term which is clearly out of context from what it was intended to mean. Does he care? It is obamaNOcare.
Besides, I want to read more on the portion of the law that includes RFID. No RFID, no care. See the kid in Texas going at it alone. But the sheep will allow RFID for a free bandaid.
Scientist no doubt will design and program chips to permanently turn off the expensive eaters and looters. Either that or tax all at 90% to cover costs.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 11/25/2012 4:31:06 AM (No. 9032691)
The Death Bill will cost 800,000 jobs and $2+ trillion. These things are always, always underestimated. The numbers should be doubled or quadrupled.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Adam, 11/25/2012 8:08:30 AM (No. 9032797)
implementation of Obamacare will hurt the Democrats, I agree but that isn´t the exact same thing as helping the Republicans. First, the Republicans will have to denounce Obamacare but with it becoming an entitlement, they won´t. And that leads me to Second, you can´t beat something with nothing. If the Republicans are not for Obamacare, what are they for?
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Cooling Saucer, 11/25/2012 8:32:41 AM (No. 9032816)
I´m just so sick in my heart of reading and wanting to believe predictions that voters are capable of smartening up and changing the political direction of this country.
If Toby Harden´s piece in correct and GOP luminaries are stabbing Romney in the back, then the GOP is as rotten a political party as anything coming from the left. Gingrich and Santorium did an enormous amount of damage to Romney during the GOP primaries. There comes a point where a contender needs to put country before self and step aside. Too many GOP candidates don´t have the sense to do that. Todd Atkins was another one ...
Anyway, the point is that Obamacare was never meant to be a permanent system -- it is a segue to single-payer. The plan was always for a huge part of the population to pay nothing for "free" health care. For the remainder who pay taxes, a sizable percentage are poised to be dropped from their employers´ coverage. That will throw more people into the exchange system, thereby overwhelming it. Its pure Cloward-Pliven. With less employer-participation, independent employer health insurance systems will not be able to survive. As more people get thrown into the exchanges, the exchange system cannot provide the necessary volume of care. Before you know it, the only remedy is for single-payer. Mission accomplished.
The Congress has already foreseen this and made sure that they will never need to compete with the masses for their healthcare. The Congress also made exempt all federal judges and the upper echelon of the Executive branch.
Some words and phrases can best be defined by giving an example. The Yiddish word chutzpah is one -- what the Congress did in exempting itself and other blessed ones is the definition of "insult to injury."
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
LZK, 11/25/2012 9:01:02 AM (No. 9032850)
Have faith everyone....
Somewhere there´s a clever attorney. He/she will read the whoooooooole bill and find one little option out for each citizen....
Trust me -- I feel it happening -- just as the conservatives opted out from busing in Chicago and dropped the public school system here to last place.....The conservatives left and saved the private school system overnight.
WE opted out of that goooooberment debacle -- WE´ll opt out of this mess.
Just wait and see....
LZK
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
bassman, 11/25/2012 9:04:38 AM (No. 9032854)
It´s time for a new party! I say call it The Free Party. The people who are for liberty will think it stands for freedom and the people who want free stuff will think it is for free stuff. Can´t lose!!
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Grambo, 11/25/2012 9:07:29 AM (No. 9032857)
Before the next four years are out, we will witness the manifestation of two laws, Stein’s and Thatcher’s.
Stein’s: (paraphrased) “Things that can’t go on forever won’t.”
Thatcher’s (paraphrased) “Socialists eventually run out of other people’s money.”
Obama is soon going to demonstrate both of the above.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
gone2pot, 11/25/2012 9:18:06 AM (No. 9032871)
The bottom line is mass confusion. Please read Rules for Radicals and read the Port Huron Statement. Confusion is not the bottom line, it´s the goal and it worked beautifully November 6th. The GOP will remain blithering idiots about it even in 2014. The GOP will be blameless in this fiasco.
and
It’s hard to see how the elections of 2014-16 won’t severely damage the Democrats and make them a minority party for the foreseeable future. Really? It´s hard to see? Do you really think the blue electoral districts will be smarter with facts then than they were between 2008 and 2012? The GOP couldn´t open a bag of reality dust if it was opened for them, and it has been opened for them. Google Penn and Teller, cups and balls trick with clear cups and you have the American voter in a "nutshell" who will pick the empty clear cup knowing and seeing the ball in the other cup. Yes, they´re that stupid and they´ll willingly only get worse.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
artman1746, 11/25/2012 9:28:46 AM (No. 9032881)
Don´t count on it. The liberals always come up with some crazy reason that its not their fault. They may just go back to blaming it on Bush. Hell, they fell for it before.
The Dems will just throw something out there, the MSM will get the high sign and start pounding it into the ignorant and gullible. The comedians will start making fun of the Rrpublicans for blaming the Dems and academia will be brainwashing the kids who cast their blind vote. Before its all over the jobless, the takers and the gullible will be convinced that another vote for the Dems will be in their best interests.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 11/25/2012 9:29:23 AM (No. 9032883)
What is that sound I hear? Ah yes, tis the whistling in the dark.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
Mrs. Obelix, 11/25/2012 9:35:32 AM (No. 9032891)
The real question is: who is our A team? Rubio? Rand Paul? Guiliani? Palin? Gingrich? Santorum? Will they tear each other apart? will competition force the best to rise to the top? And what about the fact that the people in power are already using our tax dollars to promote What Your Country Can do for You to the 47%.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
Cdunnrun, 11/25/2012 9:54:16 AM (No. 9032915)
We got rid of slavery.
We WILL get rid of Obamacare.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
Cleanhousein2012, 11/25/2012 10:42:30 AM (No. 9032975)
A third party is more likely going to be the next majority party. The GOP has lost so much support after this past election from their base and everyone they disinter mediated in ensuring Romney was their candidate, and are unlikely to regain it.
If it votes like a Dem, we might as well elect a Dem.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
caddyjak, 11/25/2012 10:47:41 AM (No. 9032981)
RNC, please wake up. If 17 states don´t show for the electoral voting, the House can elect Romney. Am I the only one in this country who knows constitutional law?
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 11/25/2012 11:07:16 AM (No. 9033003)
Doctor-to-patient prescription prior to January 1, 2013:
“Take two aspirin and call me in the morning!”
Doctor-to-patient prescription on or after January 1, 2013:
“Take two cyanide pills! Wait! I think I’ll join you.”
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
ketchuplover, 11/25/2012 11:22:17 AM (No. 9033023)
FTA: "The Democrats will be forced to defend a law that caused a recession, significantly increased insurance costs to families, and brought many businesses to their knees. It’s hard to see how the elections of 2014-16 won’t severely damage the Democrats and make them a minority party for the foreseeable future." Yeah? How did that work for pinning the housing/banking crisis on the Dems, who were by far responsible for it? How did that work in defeating Dem senators this month who voted in favor of Obamacare as well as keeping their own Cadillac plan?
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 11/25/2012 11:25:13 AM (No. 9033027)
Bwa-hahahahaha
Moran is smoking some fine chronic if he actually believes this
Wow
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
bhkat, 11/25/2012 11:49:28 AM (No. 9033068)
People that voted for Obama in 2012 because they still blamed W for the economy are too stupid to connect the failure of Obamacare to the dems.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
planetgeo, 11/25/2012 12:25:59 PM (No. 9033123)
The history of all such massive government programs is that once they are in, they never go away. They just get bigger and more expensive. Think Social Security. Think Medicare. Now Obamacare.
Politicians come and go, but bureaucracies go on forever...until, that is, they ultimately consume their host.
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
WIBadger, 11/25/2012 12:35:42 PM (No. 9033137)
Right. And for the last 3 years we also heard how the looming threat of Obamacare´s implementation would make the GOP a majority party this year. How did that work out again ?
I´m tired of all these pontificating pundit types who claim to see the future. They can go pound sand.
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 11/25/2012 1:04:05 PM (No. 9033186)
That is a question I have been asking too #22. Why did Congress exempt itself an all federal workers from Ocare? How is that equal protection under the 14th Amendment? Also, I believe one day when the full effects of Ocare begin to show themselves, a case can be made that Ocare is unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment`s `cruel and unusual punishment` clause.
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
agrippa123, 11/25/2012 1:08:58 PM (No. 9033190)
Need we remind ourselves that Republican nominee this year promised to keep key parts of Obamacare intact, including the individual mandate and the prohibition of pre-existing condition denials? Or that his political career embraced big govt policies including massive bailouts and gun control? The article describes the Republican strategy: retaining power through perpetual opposition to another perpetual govt program. That´s how the two parties (actually a single great two-winged party) maintain hegemony.
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
agrippa123, 11/25/2012 1:18:08 PM (No. 9033208)
As for the Constitutional analyses, don´tcha know? The Constitution doesn´t mean what it says; it means what the last Republican President´s Chief Justice says it says. Or did we all forget the role Republicans played in passing and affirming this law?
Pull the scales from your eyes.
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua, 11/25/2012 2:12:07 PM (No. 9033269)
Far from certain as long as the liberal media continues to control the narrative. If the Dems mobilize in off year elections like they do during presidential elections...
Listen to the liberal media and: - The economy will be the result of the Republicans. - The Republicans are too conservative. - The Republicans are too moderate. - The Republicans don´t care about black rights, hispanic rights, women´s rights, and gay rights. - The Republicans will take away your free stuff.
Also add in the number of moderates that won´t vote conservative and vice versa.
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
Attercliffe, 11/25/2012 2:23:10 PM (No. 9033286)
For obvious copyright reasons I have to summarize what I read today in a forum which is basically run and populated by a number of Duke University faculty and staff who live in a neighborhood not far from the school.
One said Blue Cross/Blue Shield is about to raise their rates by 30%. Wanted to know if anyone in the group knew of an alternative with cheaper rates.
Another one basically said ditto and that those with BC/BS would have an expensive year until things change in 2014 when AFCA takes effect.
Seems they´re under the impression that Obamacare is going to be "free"or at least less expensive than BC/BS. These are definitely the well-paid liberal elites we know and loathe so well. If they all think this way--and I believe they do--then they´re in for a huge surprise. I don´t see them voting for anyone but another Democrat, though. They´re hard-core.
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
GreatPlains, 11/25/2012 3:06:48 PM (No. 9033331)
# 6 If 23 million un and underemployed ( plus the promise of the creation of 12 million new jobs ) couldn´t convince the Moron -Americans to vote Republican , the loss of another 800, 000 jobs won´t mean a thing.
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
SteelTurman, 11/25/2012 3:28:48 PM (No. 9033356)
Wait until they turn all the VA hospitals into ´community health care centers´ ...
... all those old vets (and their families) will get off their duffs and vote.
Take a look at the nearest VA hospital to you ...
... see all the recent renovations?
Better to serve the public than vets.
I expect it´ll happen in about 18 months.
Mark my words.
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
PageTurner, 11/25/2012 11:33:47 PM (No. 9033770)
Moran overestimates the intelligence of the average low-information Obama voter. They won´t make any connection between who they voted for and their skyrocketing health care costs. It doesn´t compute.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Gun-rights testimony from a communism survivor: “You don’t know what freedom is, because you’ve never lost it”
|
|
Hot Air, by Erika Johnsen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 3:14:37 PM
Post Reply
|
|
I am always amazed — amazed — when anyone has the gall to dismiss, even laugh off, the suggestion that the right to keep and bear arms is a smart and necessary provision for a free society. Human history (not to mention current events!) is too chock-full of examples of nefarious regimes violently abusing and controlling their people, and the freedoms enjoyed by American citizens are the exception, not the rule. During a committee hearing of the Oregon state senate in considering their own state package of gun-control legislation last week, one testifier reminded the assembled lawmakers of one
|
|
Suffering from ´tattoo regret´
|
|
CNN, by Dr. Anthony Youn
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 3:11:15 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A few years ago I interviewed a handyman to do some work on my house. I noticed a teardrop tattoo at the top of his left cheek. Prior to hiring him, I searched online for what this design signified. My mouth dropped when I found out. A teardrop tattoo can mean he murdered someone. So I hired someone else. Plastic surgeons and dermatologists are seeing more and more people who want their tattoos removed, often because they worry that the tattoos could cause problems with employment. According to the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS),
|
Is a Breitbart.com vs. RedState feud brewing?
|
|
Daily Caller, by Matt K. Lewis
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 2:29:32 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Andrew Breitbart has become an iconic and beloved figure on the right, so it’s hard to imagine his eponymous empire could be in danger of losing conservative support just one year after his passing. But if recent events are a harbinger of things to come, that’s at least a possibility. It all started last October, when BuzzFeed’s McKay Coppins penned a controversial piece, arguing the outlet was “plagued by an unusual degree of disorganization and rampant infighting…” The report might have been easily dismissed, had it not been soon revealed that Breitbart.com’s Dana Loesch was suing Breitbart.com
|
|
Three Who Saved the West
|
|
Weekly Standard, by William Kristol
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 2:22:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
And now the last of them is gone. Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, and Pope John Paul II—three who won the Cold War and, it isn´t too much to say, saved the West (at least for a while!)—are no longer with us. Their examples remain. They knew what they believed but also knew they had to justify their beliefs, and that one could adjust prudently to circumstances without yielding on principle. They stood firm when in power, and they took risks to get there, challenging the conventional wisdom and the respective establishments of their nations or institutions.
|
FBI foils massacre plan at Northamptonshire school
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Nick Britten
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 10:46:18 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The 16-year-old drew up detailed plans to massacre his classmates in Northamptonshire using handguns and home-made bombs. He created intricate classroom plans and a hit-list of fellow students and where they sat, and said he would carry on shooting until the police arrived, at which point he would take his own life. But after warning users on a forum that he would be armed and ready "20 minutes from now", one user called the FBI, who alerted police in England. On Monday the boy, who cannot be named because of his age,
|
|
Guns Responsible for Global Warming
|
|
American Spectator, by Jed Babbin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 6:14:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Frustration is taking its toll in the liberals’ war against guns. President Obama, pushing his broad gun control agenda, said we should be ashamed if we’ve forgotten the Newtown shooting so soon. The New York Times opined that Obama is being shouted down by the “gun lobby,” even though he and Biden had been crisscrossing the country “…making a forceful case for a package of laws that would reduce gun violence.” That, of course, is the media narrative on gun control. For every issue there is a narrative: a set of assumptions and boundaries of thought
|
Complex Napoleon Rivalry Heads for Its Waterloo
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Max Colchester
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:52:11 AM
Post Reply
|
|
GOLFE-JUAN, France—Frank Samson has prepared for a long time to meet his Waterloo. The French lawyer impersonates Napoleon Bonaparte at re-enactment battles, but it is no idle hobby. Mr. Samson has found what he says are perfect replicas of the French general´s gray overcoat, he has studied Napoleon´s native Corsican tongue and he has had himself crowned emperor of France, in a cathedral yet. In 2015, he wants to lead thousands of military enthusiasts into the ultimate re-enactment: the 200th anniversary of the battle of Waterloo in Belgium. But an American rival stands in his way. Mark Schneider, an actor in Virginia
|
|
Repeal, Replace, Still
|
|
National Review Online, by Ramesh Ponnuru & Yuval Levin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:42:18 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Is it time to give up the fight against Obamacare? That’s a question some conservative health-care experts, pundits, and — more quietly — politicians are asking. In the first years after its passage, opponents had hoped that the Supreme Court would strike down the law or that a new president would sign its repeal before most of it took effect. But the Supreme Court decided to modify a few of its provisions instead of striking it down, and President Obama was reelected. Repeal is almost certainly off the table for four years. Obamacare will continue to be implemented.
|
Division among Republicans on Gang of Eight?
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Byron York
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:37:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
As the bipartisan Gang of Eight works to complete a comprehensive immigration reform bill, there has been a growing consensus among Senate Republicans that the bill — so far seen by no one outside the Gang — should be the subject of multiple hearings and extended consideration inside the Senate Judiciary Committee. But on Sunday there were signs that consensus does not extend to the Republicans inside the Gang. Appearing on CBS, longtime immigration reform advocate and Gang member Sen. John McCain suggested the immigration issue is so familiar to lawmakers that multiple hearings will not be necessary.
|
Liars! Illegal Immigration Surging While Obama Administration Claims it is Declining
|
|
Gateway Pundit, by Mike LaRoche
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:25:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Via Fox Nation, newly released statistics show that illegal immigrant infiltration along the U.S.-Mexico border is increasing markedly despite recent statements to the contrary by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano: “I can tell you having worked that border for 20 years, it is more secure now than it has ever been. Illegal apprehensions are at 40-year lows,” Napolitano told reporters this week in Houston. But figures released Thursday by Customs and Border Protection to Fox News tell a different story. Arrests are actually up 13 percent
|
|
Obama´s Dangerous Nuclear Dance
|
|
Daily Beast, by Leslie H. Gelb
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:11:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The White House press corps should ask President Obama this question: You’ve told Iran’s leaders that if they come close to marrying a nuclear warhead with a missile that can hit the United States or our allies, they should expect a U.S. military attack on their soil. (Snip)Administration officials would never admit it, but the main reason for their being tougher on Iran than North Korea seems tied to American domestic politics as much or more than anything else, specifically the standing of Israel and oil versus Korea and Japan.
|
How Texas Became Texas and Why It Matters
|
|
New York Times, by Bryan Burrough
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/8/2013 5:04:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
AS a Texas-raised journalist, I can tell you two things with confidence about my native state. One, its economy has been humming nicely for years. Two, this appears to greatly offend a certain breed of Northern writer, several of whom have descended on the state in an attempt to rebut stories of a “Texas miracle.” (Snip) “Texas has a long tradition of looking outside the government for support — and often finding it. That predates the Texas revolution and was reinforced by the rise of the cattle kingdom and the oil booms.”
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
McCain: ´I don´t understand´ GOP filibuster on guns
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
Former British prime minister Baroness Thatcher dies peacefully at the age of 87 after suffering a massive stroke
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by James Nye
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/8/2013 8:55:39 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Margaret Thatcher, the first female British Prime Minister who gained worldwide renown as the Iron Lady has died aged 87. Developing a formidable partnership with President Ronald Reagan during the 1980s, Mrs. Thatcher stood up to the ´Evil Empire´ of the Soviet Union, eventually witnessing its collapse. [Snip] Responding to her death, Buckingham Palace said, ´The Queen is sad to hear the news of the death of Baroness Thatcher and Her Majesty will be sending a private message of sympathy to the family, Buckingham Palace said today.´ British Prime Minster David Cameron said on hearing of her passing, ´It was
|
Christians, here´s why we´re losing our religion
|
|
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”
|
Kim Jong-un Wants Phone Call from Obama - report
|
|
Korea Broadcast Service, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/8/2013 6:56:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
North Korea’s young leader Kim Jong-un is waiting for United States President Barack Obama to make a phone call to Pyongyang to discuss easing tensions on the Korean peninsula, according to Russia’s news agency Itar-Tass. The report cited United Kingdom diplomats, saying Pyongyang was demanding the U.S. president personally call Kim Jong-un as one of the conditions to relieve the current conflict at hand. Itar-Tass also quoted the U.K.’s Sky News as saying North Korea currently has eight nuclear warheads.
|
Broadcasters worry about ´Zero TV´ homes
|
|
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from
|
´Mickey Mouse Club´ star Annette Funicello dies at 70
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Dennis McLellan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/8/2013 1:18:00 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Annette Funicello, the dark-haired darling of TV´s “The Mickey Mouse Club” in the 1950s who further cemented her status as a pop-culture icon in the ´60s by teaming with Frankie Avalon in a popular series of “beach” movies, died Monday. She was 70. Funicello, who was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 1987 and became a spokeswoman for treatment of the chronic, often-debilitating disease of the central nervous system, died at Mercy Southwest Hospital in Bakersfield, Walt Disney Co. spokesman Howard Green said. Funicello and her husband, Glen Holt, had moved from
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Chelsea Clinton doesn´t close door to public office
|
|
USA Today, by Catalina Camia
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: jackson- 4/8/2013 10:23:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Chelsea Clinton has raised her profile in the last few days, which sparked the inevitable question about the former first daughter´s future: Will she ever be like Mom and Dad and run for office? Clinton, 33, essentially said "maybe" in an interview that aired Monday on NBC´s Today show. "Right now I´m grateful to live in a city, a state and a country where I strongly support my mayor, my governor, my president and my senators and my representative," said Clinton, whose father, Bill, was president from 1993-2001 and her mother, Hillary
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|