A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


The Mandate To Raise
Taxes on the “Rich”

Creators Syndicate, Inc., by Susan Estrich

Original Article

Posted By:garnet, 11/20/2012 3:06:51 PM

Within days of winning the election, President Obama announced that his victory gave him a mandate to raise taxes on the "rich." Come again? This was a two-and-a-half-point election. It reflected a painfully divided electorate. The only mandate I saw was to unite a divided country. I voted for Obama. I voted for him because I know how hard it is to buy health insurance for a single person with even a minor pre-existing condition. In the case of my nanny/housekeeper/dear friend, it was gastritis. Thank God for Kaiser, which sold me the insurance that some years later saved

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Scribelus, 11/20/2012 3:11:33 PM     (No. 9026072)

I will never give credence to a self-confessed Obama voter!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Attila DiMedici, 11/20/2012 3:15:41 PM     (No. 9026079)

Good grief, she voted for Obama and is surprised that he takes his election as a mandate to raise taxes? That is what he said he was going to do if re-elected.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: youngtexan, 11/20/2012 3:15:49 PM     (No. 9026080)

OK, let me get this straight, Susan. You voted for Obamacare but that´s it. Sorry, but when you voted for him, you voted for him to tax the rich(you), you voted for him to do whatever he wants. And he´s gonna do it. Thanks, Susan. NOT.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: civilservant, 11/20/2012 3:20:37 PM     (No. 9026089)

Susan, Susan......please see my post on the Warren Buffet thread and KNOW that I hope he is holding YOU in his arms as my dream plays out........

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: JLoophole, 11/20/2012 3:22:17 PM     (No. 9026096)

I don´t even know what to say about this. That she could have voted for Barry for all of her reasons given; and yet somehow not connect the dots that those very programs must lead to higher taxes, just boggles my mind.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 6 - Posted by: Psalm91:11, 11/20/2012 3:25:21 PM     (No. 9026099)

She said she voted for obama because of obamacare, and in the same sentence thanks Kaiser for the insurance policy she was able to purchase for her nanny.

That was not Susan´s most brilliant statement.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: msjena, 11/20/2012 3:25:24 PM     (No. 9026100)

Sorry, Susan. Barry was the whole package. You voted for him; you voted for higher taxes.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: TheMom, 11/20/2012 3:28:04 PM     (No. 9026106)

We as voters should have a line item veto. /s


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: pearlyjo, 11/20/2012 3:33:56 PM     (No. 9026115)

Buyers remorse?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: MattMusson, 11/20/2012 3:43:02 PM     (No. 9026132)

Guess what? When the Bush tax cuts expire - it will raise taxes on the MIDDLE CLASS. It won´t just be the RICH.

Obama want all taxpayers to pay more for more goodies for non-taxpayers.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: EQKimball, 11/20/2012 3:47:09 PM     (No. 9026142)

Prof. Susan Estrich (USC Law School) was the manager of the Dukakis presidential campaign and a frequent contributor on Fox News. She has likely never voted for a Republican, and doubtless would have voted for Barack Obama if he had strolled naked in high heels through the streets of Washington. That said, her comments are interesting.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: janjan, 11/20/2012 3:52:31 PM     (No. 9026148)

Well isn´t she special. She loves all things liberal except when they try to reach into her pocket. That´s the whole point of liberalism sunshine. Suck it up.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 11/20/2012 3:56:01 PM     (No. 9026155)

The impulse to soak the rich is as old as politics. I imagine our Stone Age ancestors practiced their own primitive version of it with the same gusto modern liberals and Democrats do. It is a perennial feature of the human mind, a manifestation of, among other things, emotional immaturity. Whenever one hears people preaching about "fairness" in politics there is a better than even chance that the speaker is arrested at the infantile stage of development, is resentful, envious, and brimming with malice. Liberals disguise their disowned and quite unpleasant feelings and hide behind claims of altruism and concern for social justice, but 99 times out of a hundred the actual motives are simple malice and moral vanity. Obama is typical of those who think that some people have enough, indeed too much money. How much money is enough, how much is enough? He did not say. But he wants to play Robin Hood to steal from the rich and give to the poor. If he would take a Saturday special and mug rich people in dark alleys and immediately hand over the proceeds to people who are genuinely in dire need through no fault of their own, I might have a little sympathy for him. But no, he wants to use the government´s monopoly of force to confiscate the property of others and depot it into the vast maw of the U.S. Treasury where, as everybody knows, the vast majority of it will be wasted, misappropriated, used for corrupt deals, and wind up disappearing and doing very little good to anyone.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Mass Minority, 11/20/2012 4:00:08 PM     (No. 9026159)

#6 it is more palatable because it is in fact already the law of the land. Raising rates will take money from everyone. Period. It also leaves a lot of room for future tinkering to "close loopholes" to increase revenues.

I would rather see deductions cut way back and rates lowered so our system approaches a flat tax than see deductions tinkered with while base rates are raised through the roof.

Deductions are alreeady limited for many of us. Its called the Alternative minimum tax and it basically states that above a certain income threshold you only get X dollars of deductions and you lose all of your exemptions. It was enacted to punish 11 taxpayers in 1969 (Bill of entendre anyone?) and now hits millions. Oh, and it carries a HUGE (read about $6,000 added tax) Marriage penalty as well.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Namma, 11/20/2012 4:00:15 PM     (No. 9026160)

wht a ditz...but then she has always been one

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: 4Justice, 11/20/2012 4:00:49 PM     (No. 9026161)

Susan, you really are dumber than a box of rocks. You voted for Obama because you were concerned about how hard it is for a person to get insurance with a pre-existing condition but then you are happy because Kaiser was able to sell you the insurance anyway??? Ugh...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Vaquero45, 11/20/2012 4:01:58 PM     (No. 9026164)

Well, I see Susan is still as dumb as a sack of hammers.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: M2, 11/20/2012 4:06:36 PM     (No. 9026168)

Exactly, #5. She´s not very good at connecting the dots, is she?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: droopydog, 11/20/2012 4:13:04 PM     (No. 9026174)

I think Estrich was Dukakis´ campaign manager.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: shamus, 11/20/2012 4:17:18 PM     (No. 9026179)

Susan must pay her fair share.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: trapper, 11/20/2012 4:22:55 PM     (No. 9026191)

The Congressmen in the House have a mandate to NOT raise taxes. So there.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 11/20/2012 4:35:09 PM     (No. 9026221)

If I had to listen to her whiney voice for longer than about ten minutes, one of us would decease...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: craige, 11/20/2012 4:39:14 PM     (No. 9026231)

Something to think about.

Dividend tax is increasing to 43%. After Tax Yields on dividends will decrease, thus causing the price of stocks to go down. That makes other financial instruments more desirable.

Debt instruments will not have to yield as much, to compete. Their prices should go up.

More of ´the rich´ could start looking overseas...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: FL_Absentee_Voter, 11/20/2012 4:41:30 PM     (No. 9026235)

Michael Dukakis. ´Nough said.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 25 - Posted by: mickturn, 11/20/2012 4:44:25 PM     (No. 9026242)

This is nothing but class warfare...the takers taking from the makers!

This will come around ´in spades´ when the takers are identified by the makers and the makers fire all of them...How´s that class warfare working out for ya now?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: WMP1952, 11/20/2012 4:56:57 PM     (No. 9026261)

Ms. Estrich makes some good points but she also shows her emotional side. We´ve been told time and again that women are more inclined to vote emotionally. I am a woman and that is not how I vote but it is very common. There is a comment at the end of her article by someone who tries to justify why Ms. Estrich should have her taxes raised. They talk about never having made more than $107,000 (she and her husband) and they managed to live in nice neighborhood, send their children to nice private institutions, etc. and about who really suffers. The whining is incredible. Just for a moment, throw out the discussions about who can afford what, deductions, etc. We all have different ideas along those lines and what may or may not be a good idea. Bottom line - I am a middle class married female - however, I DO NOT think ANYONE - and I don´t care how rich you are, should ever have to pay 39.6% of their wealth for federal income tax. Add to that whatever state taxes they are paying (depending where they live) and they may well be paying over 50% in income taxes. That is criminal. I also think EVERYONE should pay something - even if it is a mere $25.00 a year. No skin in the game - no reason for you to see why tax increases are not the answer.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: geekrunner, 11/20/2012 5:42:14 PM     (No. 9026326)

FTA: But beginning a new term with what will look to many like a class war is not the way to fulfill the real mandate of this election, which is to bring us together, not turn us against each other.

What cave have you been living in Miss Susan??? He´s been fanning the flames of class warfare for the last two years! Geez


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Mai Bad, 11/20/2012 5:47:45 PM     (No. 9026339)

Yo..yo...Well...at least Susan doesn´t have SNAGGLE TEETH like. DWS!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 11/20/2012 5:54:18 PM     (No. 9026359)

I´ve got an idea, Susan, let´s just raise taxes on registered Democrats!
That way they can practice what they preach.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Hamrman, 11/20/2012 5:57:22 PM     (No. 9026370)

He has no mandate!!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: gagolfer, 11/20/2012 6:01:50 PM     (No. 9026376)

#15- I think you mean "Bill of Attainder", entendre.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 32 - Posted by: gagolfer, 11/20/2012 6:17:54 PM     (No. 9026395)

"Bill of Attainder", NOT entendre, I meant to say.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: kono, 11/20/2012 6:50:46 PM     (No. 9026440)

"I voted for Obama. I voted for him because I know how hard it is to buy health insurance for a single person with even a minor pre-existing condition."

Thanks, Susan. Thanks alot. "Romneycare" was much like "Obamacare" in how it was claimed to handle pre-existing conditions.

Regardless of any ´conservative credentials´ she might have, S.E. is a bona fide bitsy ditch, as far as I´m concerned. (Lucky for her she has her looks and singing voice to fall back on....)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 34 - Posted by: skywarrior, 11/20/2012 7:00:14 PM     (No. 9026461)

Thanks a lot #34. I just spewed wine all over my keyboard. Oh well, it was cheap wine. I´m trying to sample what the future holds for us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: strike3, 11/20/2012 7:35:41 PM     (No. 9026538)

Susan you´re a dummass. Anybody who would vote for a criminal dictator, an unqualified child, a hate-filled moron for such a selfish reason does not have the right to call herself an American. Here´s a finger salute to you and to the millions of other sheep who stupidly rationalized their vote for an illegal president.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: god of irony, 11/20/2012 9:29:07 PM     (No. 9026707)

Susan and the obamaphiles should put their money where their mouths are and pony up and pay extra taxes voluntarily.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 712782




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"



No, The Obamacare Debate
Isn’t Over
American Spectator, by David Catron    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 4/7/2014 7:03:29 AM     Post Reply
Last Tuesday, our President swaggered into the Rose Garden to announce that 7.1 million people have signed up for health coverage through Obamacare’s exchanges and that all further argument about the future of his “signature domestic achievement” was pointless: “The debate over repealing this law is over. The Affordable Care Act is here to stay.” The problem with this claim is that no one with a basic grasp of arithmetic believes Obama’s enrollment figures, only about a quarter of the electorate supports his “reform” law, and it is still the target of multiple lawsuits challenging its constitutionality.

Obamacare:They Shoot Horses
Don´t They?
American Spectator, by David Catron    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/31/2014 7:31:12 AM     Post Reply
A new survey reveals that public esteem for Obamacare is continuing to plummet, hitting yet another historic low. (snip) The AP survey shows that a mere “26 percent of Americans support the Affordable Care Act.” (snip) When the law was passed, 39 percent of the public supported it. But the President, along with his accomplices in Congress and the media, assured us that this percentage would rise once “reform” was implemented. In other words, Obama and his minions are no better at prognostication than they are at managing websites, insurance exchanges or anything else relating to health care.

Hobby Lobby Has Its
Day in Court
American Spectator, by David Catron    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/26/2014 8:13:39 AM     Post Reply
One of the reasons Clarence Thomas gives for the studious silence he maintains during Supreme Court hearings is that his fellow justices have shown an increasing tendency to talk too much during oral arguments, thus preventing advocates from presenting their arguments coherently. Yesterday’s Supreme Court hearing in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. Sebelius suggest that Thomas is right. Paul D. Clement, who appeared on behalf of the two companies challenging the Obamacare contraception mandate, was repeatedly interrupted and badgered by justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Ginsburg.

Why Obama Scares Me
Creators Syndicate, by Mona Charen    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/21/2014 8:32:16 AM     Post Reply
The most febrile of George W. Bush haters liked to claim during his tenure that the former president "scared" them. There is far more reason to be frightened by President Barack Obama, because fecklessness and inconstancy trigger wars. The outstanding example of weakness inviting aggression was the conduct of the democracies toward Adolf Hitler in the 1930s. Though it has been retroactively tainted as shameful cowardice, the policy of appeasement grew out of a "war weariness" that was far more understandable than our own. Britain and France suffered millions of dead and wounded in World War I and were desperate to

Kos Folds Up the Big Tent
Politico, by Matt Bennett and Jim Kessler    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/21/2014 8:25:35 AM     Post Reply
If Markos Moulitsas had his way there’d be no Affordable Care Act, no Dodd-Frank, no economic stimulus package. That’s the price when purity tests are applied to Democrats. In a remarkable post yesterday, Moulitsas, founder and publisher of the progressive community site DailyKos, celebrates the departure from the Senate of 10 moderate Democrats over the last decade, and makes clear his hope that Senators Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) and Mary Landrieu (D-La.) lose their tough reelection battles this year. He doesn’t name some other moderates in tight races, like Mark Begich (D-Alaska) and Kay Hagan (D-N.C.), but his logic suggests that he’d

Closing in on No. 1
New York Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/21/2014 8:19:10 AM     Post Reply
Mayor de Blasio took great pride Thursday in signing the first piece of legislation of his mayoralty: the paid-sick-leave bill. But the move only illustrates why a personal-finance Web site has just ranked the city one of the worst places for finding a job. Under the new law, come April 1 companies with as few as five workers must offer at least five paid sick days a year. But April 1 is likely to turn out to be April Fool’s for New York workers. Because the consequence of this law is likely to be .?.?. fewer jobs. Businesses that can’t afford to

RNC Chairman: Obamacare still stinks
USA Today, by Reince Priebus    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/21/2014 8:07:32 AM     Post Reply
Obamacare turns four this Sunday, and it´s never looked worse. For months, the news has not been kind. A broken promise, a broken website. Lost plans, lost doctors. Rising prices, rising frustration. Shrinking paychecks, a shrinking workforce. Unsecure data, insecure Democrats. The few Democrats willing to talk about Obamacare publicly struggle to defend the law on merits. So they´ve resorted to one last defense. They insist Republicans don´t have any ideas. Or as DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz phrased it on CNN´s Crossfire a couple months ago, "What is the Republican solution? … What is the solution to ensuring that everybody in

Is This Illinois’s Scott Walker?
National Review, by Eliana Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/20/2014 8:25:38 AM     Post Reply
Public-sector unions took a big hit in Illinois Tuesday evening as a gubernatorial candidate they have poured millions of dollars into defeating seized victory in the state’s Republican primary. And now, in one of the few governor’s races Republicans see as a pickup opportunity this year, private-equity millionaire Bruce Rauner is poised to give Illinois governor Pat Quinn a run for his money and has a real shot at becoming the state’s first Republican governor in over a decade. Rauner set unions on edge during the primary campaign, criticizing their leaders and pledging to reform the state’s bankrupt pension system.

A Special Prosecutor for the IRS
Wall Street Journal, by Jim Jordan    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/20/2014 8:21:06 AM     Post Reply
The House Oversight Committee´s investigation of the IRS is at an inflection point. The president´s congressional supporters realize that the administration´s version of the agency´s targeting of conservative nonprofits seeking tax-exempt status—such as blaming local officials in the Cincinnati office or claiming that liberal groups were victimized along with conservative groups—is nonsense. Instead of debating the substance, they have resorted to procedural antics and misleading rhetoric. I have spent a considerable amount of time and energy on the investigation—which included 38 daylong interviews of IRS and Treasury employees ranging from line employees in Cincinnati to the IRS commissioner to the chief

Cuomo’s grasp of public opinion
leaves de Blasio looking dumb
New York Post, by Bob McManus    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/19/2014 8:59:45 AM     Post Reply
Is anybody looking dumber than Bill de Blasio right about now? Tuesday’s Quinnipiac University poll gave him a 45 percent public-approval rating, down from 53 percent in January. This is consistent with earlier surveys, and it is astonishingly low for a new mayor. But de Blasio has been stepping in cow pies since he took his hand off the Bible on Inauguration Day. The consequences have ranged from minor embarrassments to the humiliating drubbing he’s now taking from Gov. Cuomo on education reform.

Throw the lead to November
The Hill, by James Carville    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/19/2014 8:50:02 AM     Post Reply
In early February this year, I wrote a column for The Hill in which I tried to talk Democrats off the cliff. I warned them against having such a gloomy outlook for November. To tell you the truth, though, when I saw the result from the Florida special election last Tuesday, I asked myself where my straight razor was because I thought I might need it. But before we succumb to 1994 and 2010 syndrome, I’d like to say that a lot of the things that I said in the February column remain true. The fundamental consideration is this: if

Hobby Lobby Hysteria Hits New High
American Spectator, by David Catron    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/19/2014 6:52:51 AM     Post Reply
Next Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments concerning constitutional challenges to Obamacare’s contraception mandate brought by Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties. (snip) Neither company objects to birth control, per se. Indeed, both provide coverage to their employees for most types of contraception. Yet civilization as we know it will collapse if the justices rule in their favor, according to the increasingly shrill prognostications of panicky liberals. Such a decision, progressives shriek, would constitute a victory for the dark forces behind the “war on women,” erode employee protections against discrimination, and dramatically reduce access to health care



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Darrell Issa: Emails suggest Elijah Cummings
prompted IRS targeting of True the Vote

63 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Susan Ferrechio    Original Article
Posted By: BaseballFan- 4/9/2014 5:13:32 PM     Post Reply
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., has accused the panel´s top Democrat of prompting the Internal Revenue Service in 2012 to target a conservative organization applying for nonprofit status. Issa said records obtained last week from the IRS show communications from the office of ranking member Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., about True the Vote, a Texas-based, nonprofit conservative group that aims to prevent voter fraud. The communications at one point involved Lois Lerner, the ex-IRS official who Issa´s panel is poised to hold in contempt of Congress on Thursday for refusing to provide testimony about her

Hank Aaron Compares Republicans
That Oppose Obama To KKK

56 replie(s)
CBS, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: FelineFine- 4/9/2014 11:02:02 AM     Post Reply
Baseball Hall of Famer Hank Aaron compared Republicans that oppose President Barack Obama to the Ku Klux Klan. Speaking to USA Today Tuesday on the 40th anniversary of his then record-breaking 715th home run, the 80-year-old Aaron said that Republicans are hindering Obama’s job performance. “Sure, this country has a black president, but when you look at a black president, President Obama is left with his foot stuck in the mud from all of the Republicans with the way he’s treated,” Aaron told USA Today Sports.

Eric Holder strays from planned remarks
42 replie(s)
Politico, by Tal Kopan    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/10/2014 7:33:24 AM     Post Reply
Attorney General Eric Holder strayed from prepared remarks to slam the way he was “treated” by a House committee the day before, calling it evidence of “ugly and divisive” civil rights challenges facing him and President Barack Obama. Speaking to the Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network at its annual convention in New York on Wednesday, Holder talked about the state of civil rights today and brought up a House committee hearing Tuesday that grew contentious, according to video from Mediaite and reports from outlets including Capital New York. “The last five years have been defined by significant strides and

Meet the 2016 Republican Nominee
37 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Daren Jonescu    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/9/2014 6:45:01 AM     Post Reply
How does the Republican Party establishment choose its presidential candidate? Typically, constitutionalists accuse their establishment rivals of being moderate, risk-averse, stubborn old fools who lack faith in conservative principles. This is a soothing interpretation, as it begins from the hypothesis that the contest between conservatives and the GOP elite is a family feud. But there is another hypothesis -- less soothing, but, at least from an outsider´s bird´s-eye view, more reconcilable with the facts. This hypothesis is that America has reached a stage of progressive soft despotism in which the only important family feud in national politics is between the fundamentally

RAND study: By our estimate, 3.9 million
people signed up for ObamaCare, not
7.1 million like the White House says

32 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Allahpundit    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/9/2014 4:25:19 AM     Post Reply
A caveat right off the bat: RAND’s estimate only runs through March 28 whereas the actual deadline for signing up was March 31st. Given the crush of traffic on Healthcare.gov in late March, many more people could have signed up over those last three days than were captured by these numbers. On the other hand, the White House was claiming six million sign-ups as of March 27. There’s no way to reconcile that with RAND’s data. One of them is wrong. Maybe both, in fact. There’s a big spike in Medicaid, just as everyone expected. There’s a less big but

Researchers raise
questions about flu drugs

32 replie(s)
USA Today, by Michelle Healy    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/10/2014 1:17:52 AM     Post Reply
A new review is questioning the effectiveness of two key drugs enlisted in the fight against influenza and in turn the investments by governments to stockpile the drugs in the event of a global flu outbreak. The antiviral drugs Tamiflu (oseltamivir) and Relenza (zanamivir ) are commonly used to treat influenza in healthy adults and children. In the case of Tamiflu, the drug does shorten symptoms of influenza by about half a day - as the manufacturer suggests - but there is insufficient evidence to support claims that it reduces hospital admissions or serious complications, such as confirmed pneumonia or

Holder on Gohmert exchange: ‘What
attorney general has ever had to
deal with that kind of treatment?’

29 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Chuck Ross    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/9/2014 7:08:41 PM     Post Reply
Eric Holder ventured off script in a speech Wednesday to the National Action Network, the organization led by MSNBC host and recently-exposed FBI informant Al Sharpton. “I’m pleased to note that the last five years have been defined by significant strides and by lasting reforms,” said Holder at the conference of black activists, before improvising “even in the face, even in the face, of unprecedented, unwarranted, ugly, and divisive adversity.” “If you don’t believe that, if you look at the way, forget about me, forget about me, if you look at the way the attorney general of the United States was treated

Democrat Elijah Cummings Faces
Up to Five Years in Federal Prison

29 replie(s)
Gateway Pundit, by Jim Hoft    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/10/2014 5:20:42 AM     Post Reply
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) could face up to five years in federal prison for obstructing a Congressional proceeding. On Wednesday, Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) and five Subcommittee Chairmen on the committee sent a letter to Ranking Member Cummings demanding an explanation for his staff’s queries from the IRS, why the Minority hid these efforts from the Majority, and why the Ranking Member denied such actions by his staff at a February Subcommittee hearing: “Although you have previously denied that your staff made inquiries to the IRS about conservative organization True the Vote that may have led to additional

George Bush´s paintings
are ´copied off Google images
and Wikipedia´ art critic claims

27 replie(s)
Independent [UK], by Rob Williams    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 4/9/2014 10:47:55 AM     Post Reply
As a former President of The Most Powerful Country In The World, George W Bush has significantly greater access to world leaders than most budding artists. (Snip) Art critics have pointed out that a number of the 30 portraits in the exhibition appear to be based on images thrown up by a cursory search of the person´s name in Google Images. In some cases the portrait seems to have been based on the very first image result on the search engine. Rather remarkably, even the portrait of his own father, someone who he surely could have asked to sit for him, appears to be based on an Associated Press portrait which appears on the first page of

Hercules Actor Kevin Sorbo:
Hollywood, Media Ignoring
‘The Crime of the Century’

27 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Michael W. Chapman    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/9/2014 6:57:56 PM     Post Reply
Although the news media and Hollywood relish telling stories about horrific crimes and serial killers, they are strangely silent about Dr. Kermit Gosnell, an abortionist who killed living, viable babies by snipping their spinal cords with scissors, and who is “America’s most prolific serial killer,” said actor Kevin Sorbo and his wife Sam Jenkins in a video to promote funding for a movie about Gosnell. “Kermit Gosnell is America’s most prolific serial killer,” says Kevin Sorbo, who starred in the TV series Hercules: The Legendary Journeys. “For more than three decades he was an abortion doctor in Philadelphia, where he

Firefox Expands Into Censorship
26 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Jack Kemp    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/9/2014 9:10:58 AM     Post Reply
This morning I clicked on a link to a Red State website article concerning “The War on Women” and “Paycheck Equality” and got quite a surprise (the same thing happens when a Firefox user goes directly to the article). Nanny Firefox posted a political opinion on my screen before allowing me to proceed to read the article. This message didn’t appear when I accessed a second article which met with Firefox’s political commissar’s approval. Here’s what Firefox said: Careful Now! (shouldn’t they have said “Achtung! or “Verboten!” or something similar?). This website could not be displayed by Firefox because it is not

Stephen Colbert to replace Letterman
26 replie(s)
Entertainment Magazine, by James Hibbard    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 4/10/2014 12:10:39 PM     Post Reply
Official: Stephen Colbert is the new host of CBS’ Late Show. Release: The CBS Television Network today announced that Stephen Colbert, the host, writer and executive producer of the Emmy and Peabody Award-winning “The Colbert Report,” will succeed David Letterman as the host of THE LATE SHOW, effective when Mr. Letterman retires from the broadcast. The five-year agreement between CBS and Colbert was announced by Leslie Moonves, President and CEO, CBS Corporation, and Nina Tassler, Chairman of CBS Entertainment. Letterman, the legendary, critically acclaimed host of the CBS late night series for 21 years, announced his retirement on his April 3 broadcast. Colbert’s


Post Reply   Close thread 712782





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS