A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Rep. King: Petraeus testified
Al-Qaeda Element Removed
From Rice´s Cia Talking Points

Breitbart's Big Peace, by John Nolte

Original Article

Posted By:drive, 11/16/2012 11:13:01 AM

Republican Congressman Peter King just exited the closed-door hearing with David Petraeus to update the media, and his description of the ex-CIA Chief´s testimony contained more than one bombshell. For starters, King said Petraeus told them that the CIA talking points meant for U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice´s Sept. 16 round robin of five Sunday network news shows, originally contained the information that there was evidence al-Qaeda elements were involved in the attack. These talking points were then altered through "an inter-agency process."

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: ohioTom, 11/16/2012 11:28:17 AM     (No. 9018443)

"Inter-agency process"??? Sounds like garbage to me that he and others can hide behind. Someone, somewhere evidently CHANGED the text. No PROCESS did anything. An actual person or persons did.

It´s OBama who is responsible whether he wants to say so or not. It is OBAMA who OWNS the f*cking processes!!!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: God of Irony, 11/16/2012 11:34:27 AM     (No. 9018455)

Of course it never occured to these senate idiots to ask WHY Petreaus changed his story and WHO is the inter=agency process.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: jimmyfoxhound, 11/16/2012 11:36:30 AM     (No. 9018460)

And he proves to be a coward after all, hiding behind washington-speak.. shameful, go have another extramarital affair mr. honorable..

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: gobushcheneygo, 11/16/2012 11:37:12 AM     (No. 9018461)

This is a salon, not a saloon.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: bmw50, 11/16/2012 11:40:43 AM     (No. 9018471)

Find the people on this "inter-agency" and you´ll find who´s pulling Obama´s strings and who is actually running this country.

And wouldn´t you like to know??!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 6 - Posted by: John318, 11/16/2012 11:47:40 AM     (No. 9018493)

So much for military honor.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: happy conservative, 11/16/2012 11:53:01 AM     (No. 9018500)

I could hear him falling on his sword all the way in CA. What a sad end to an estimable military career.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: mythman, 11/16/2012 11:56:30 AM     (No. 9018514)

"Inter-agency Process" = Obama´s creatures decide what truth is.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: TXknitter, 11/16/2012 11:59:34 AM     (No. 9018525)

It seems to me, hearing Peter King on FOX this morning that they got a whole bunch of nothing in that "hearing." Clinton and Obama still off the hook day after day.....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: grambo, 11/16/2012 11:59:53 AM     (No. 9018528)

Who would stand to benefit from the video myth? Answer: Barack Hussein Obama. His Arab Spring/Osama-is-dead narrative has to be protected. It’s obvious that the WH hatched the myth, and leaned on Petraeus to fudge his original testimony, almost certainly by blackmailing him with exposure of his affair.

Because that is crime, and one that involves an act of war against America, it rises to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors.

The house must impeach.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 11 - Posted by: Haskell, 11/16/2012 11:59:54 AM     (No. 9018529)

Valerie Jarrett edited the talking points while O was packing for his fundraising trip to Las Vegas

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 12 - Posted by: Bettysez, 11/16/2012 12:01:30 PM     (No. 9018542)

It may not have changed the election. People I talked to about it did not think Benghazi was important, they don´t understand how it could impact them, it didn´t interfere with their TMZ.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: lakerman1, 11/16/2012 12:12:08 PM     (No. 9018566)

-

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Kurto, 11/16/2012 12:16:03 PM     (No. 9018572)

Inter-agency Process = Who is in charge of this process? If we are to believe this is a compilation of reports from all intelligence departments, then which dept originated the video narrative that was included in Rice´s talking points?



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: preciosodrogas, 11/16/2012 12:16:38 PM     (No. 9018573)

Mr. Honorable or not, if they don´t ask the questions they can´t get the answers. It appears they weren´t asking the hard questions just providing a forum for the Administration (which Petraeus seems to still be a part of, at least in his heart)to layout their story.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: lakerman1, 11/16/2012 12:17:28 PM     (No. 9018578)

Unfortunately, #13 is correct. We have a kardashian electorate, and once the Fat Bast*rd implicitly endorsed president zero, the election was decided.
I have been around since FDR was president, lived through Nixon´s presidency, Ford´s ineptitude, bill clinton´s perversions, and this is the first time in my life that I hold little hope that our republic as a constitutional democracy will stand.
I say that in all seriousness. We are doomed.
President Zero´s campaign has found the formula for bringing out the minority and lower class vote - the 47%, if you will, and that will be the template for future elections, presidential and congressional.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: fireman28, 11/16/2012 12:20:19 PM     (No. 9018584)

# 13 - is totally correct.

Eric Erickson on his talk show mentioned it also. Four people dead did not change any DemoRat minds enough to go vote Romney.

The number of Obama votes was down, so we really do not know why they stayed home. Not many changed their votes to Romney.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: MMC, 11/16/2012 12:21:09 PM     (No. 9018588)

My uber liberal npr listening sister said to me " there is something wrong with the timeline in Benghazi".

"it smells like a cover up"

Sex may sell papers, but murder and cover up are easily understood as well.

I still want to know who ordered the Stand Down.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: fireman28, 11/16/2012 12:21:18 PM     (No. 9018589)

And where are the Survivors who flew out the next morning.

Has anyone seen / heard??

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 20 - Posted by: Edgelady, 11/16/2012 12:24:16 PM     (No. 9018595)

Petraeus resigned so he could tell the truth without fear.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: zzzghy, 11/16/2012 12:24:53 PM     (No. 9018596)

Easy there, #1.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 22 - Posted by: Judith, 11/16/2012 12:25:58 PM     (No. 9018602)

So, does liberal, super brilliant rice enjoy being used as a stupid tool of the dem party? Is she hitting the bottle as hard as hillary is in order to tolerate their supine position under king obama´s foot?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: alloysteel, 11/16/2012 12:28:05 PM     (No. 9018609)

"an inter-agency process"

Translation: Herself, the Cold and Joyless, had put her not-so-inconsiderable thumb on the scale.

And with that much shift in priorities, Susan Rice had to have known beforehand the actual involvement of al-Qaeda and its parent organization, the Muslim Brotherhood.

Yet she repeated the patent fabrication.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: shurnuff, 11/16/2012 12:34:22 PM     (No. 9018626)

Petraeus benefactor in the White House ain´t gonna be happy about this testimony. Can´t wait to hear more....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: gam, 11/16/2012 12:43:43 PM     (No. 9018647)

I already knew that anything out of Susan Rice´s mouth would be a lie. Who ordered the STAND DOWN???? That´s the most important question. Who let these 4 brave Americans die??? President Jarrett or Obama????

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: redwhite&blue2, 11/16/2012 12:45:31 PM     (No. 9018652)

So many LIARS!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Gloating, 11/16/2012 12:46:42 PM     (No. 9018656)

Now what happens? Please don´t tell me the Congress is goingto let this pass. Soldiers, sailors , Marines, Ambassadors and consul staff must be wondering what about if it was me? This does not generate a feeling of confidence. Call Val Jar in to testify under oath. Leave her Secret Service guard outside.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 28 - Posted by: rplat, 11/16/2012 12:47:23 PM     (No. 9018659)

Don´t hold your breath while waiting for the pseudo-communsit main stream media to support the thesis that Obama´s goons removed the line. They´ll just keep on lying, and lying, and lying, and lying and being the Obama propaganda arm. As for Rice, she´s the modern day "Manchurian Candidate" and will continue to spew her mindless babble forever.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: pixie1942, 11/16/2012 12:47:47 PM     (No. 9018661)



  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 30 - Posted by: pixie1942, 11/16/2012 12:49:10 PM     (No. 9018665)

#1 and #26 the answer is spelled SOROS

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: GreatPlains, 11/16/2012 12:54:10 PM     (No. 9018679)

# 13 I can´t tell you how many educated , professional people I have encountered
that don´t have a clue about Benghazi.
Rove and Sheldon Adelson and the other Super PACS should have spent their millions
trying to buy one of the tv networks.
That might have done more good.
So...are we to believe that the Director of the CIA never told the President ????
Or that Obama never asked Petraeus ? -Oh wait, I can buy that.
Was Petraeus under oath ?
The Democrats and the media continue to focus on the video and ignore the bigger story.
That someone in the Oval Office decided that an
entire consulate of 34 " folks " should burn to death.
Now.. if they were NBA players or rappers in danger , I absolutely believe Barry would have leapt into action and ordered
every asset possible immediately
deployed to save them.
Barry took Jay- Z and Beyonce into the Situation Room , but,
he wouldn´t enter it to save the folks in danger at Benghazi .
Some Americans are obviously more expendable than others.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 11/16/2012 12:58:15 PM     (No. 9018685)

The talking points were altered because Susan is a black woman - - who is also pro-abortion.

Hmmmm? Black? Woman? Pro-abortion? OK. Nothing to see here, folks.

NEXT!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: M Stuart, 11/16/2012 1:14:28 PM     (No. 9018718)

It´s like evolution. All of the pieces magically rearranged themselves and formed a talking point without any possible intelligent input.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 34 - Posted by: zbogwan2, 11/16/2012 1:20:42 PM     (No. 9018734)

Petraeus,started the ball rolling, by his testimony today. Now Congress has to build on it and see where it goes. Hopefully the Pres. and his Mob will be nailed for changing the CIA´s original report on Benghazi?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: trombo, 11/16/2012 1:27:22 PM     (No. 9018749)

The truth about Bengazi would not have altered the election results. This election was determined by the greedy, the frightened, and the dumb. These voters do not love their country enough to do the right thing in the voting booth and put their country first.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: grampstosix, 11/16/2012 1:28:03 PM     (No. 9018751)

I don´t think most people ever bought into the idea that it was the video that started things in Benghazi.Certainly not the regulars at this forum.A question that I wonder about is why was it U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice that was asked to go on the talk shows with the fabricated "talking points"?
As far as who was the final authority on what was to be said I agree with those who say Obama because he did not want the Al Qaeda connection made because it would contradict his claim that we had Al Qaeda on the run.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: Arizona Chief, 11/16/2012 1:28:03 PM     (No. 9018752)

This things smells a lot like Axelrod and that ain´t good.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: jt26, 11/16/2012 1:29:20 PM     (No. 9018754)

Bet Jarrett and Axelrod´s fingerprints are all over those edited talking points. And Susan Rice is a fool to be setup to go on TV and flat out lie. I think that Rice like Obama are at best middling talents who have ridden the affirmative action train to fat city.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: harper, 11/16/2012 1:29:37 PM     (No. 9018756)

Can´t expect the Democrats or their supporters to care about the Benghazi terrorist attack. None of the victims were of gender or race.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: earlybird, 11/16/2012 1:49:06 PM     (No. 9018800)

How about Tom Donilon, National Security Adviser, and the person charged with keeping eruptions down during the last critical months of Obie´s close race for reelection?

Read on:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/us/politics/tom-donilon-a-manager-of-overseas-crises.html?pagewanted=all

Perhaps he tinkered with the wording in the CIA intel before they became Susan Rice´s public talking points....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: ohioTom, 11/16/2012 1:54:26 PM     (No. 9018817)

If in the course of attacking the embassy, the terrorists would have somehow disabled all Obamaphones, there would have been hell to pay.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: trackman999, 11/16/2012 2:02:49 PM     (No. 9018838)

The news is whatever the press makes it to be. if they dont print it , it never happened. AND, if nothing happened , and they say it did,......well it did !. The media stopped reporting truth a long time ago, what drives them is agenda.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 43 - Posted by: horacer, 11/16/2012 2:15:55 PM     (No. 9018868)

Read the link at #41. After reading I agree, Tom Donilon changed the talking points and briefed Rice.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 44 - Posted by: fed-up, 11/16/2012 2:26:29 PM     (No. 9018893)

This paves the way for a Special Select Committee in investigate and have PUBLIC hearings. McCain has said as much. There are too many different branches of this administration that have given conflicting testimony and then we have the statements from Rice and the testimony of the others already. Too bad for Obama that we were paying attention when they lied. Now we just have to sort out who it was that told Rice what to say. Shouldnt be too complicated.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 45 - Posted by: LZK, 11/16/2012 3:27:04 PM     (No. 9019044)

I like Rep. King´s gutsy approach -- usually...

BUT -- me thinks thou doth DC/speak too much....

He´s the one who called the president a liar at the first state of the union speech obama made. Remember?

LZK

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 46 - Posted by: TXknitter, 11/16/2012 3:38:40 PM     (No. 9019072)

Rice is a far left hack, #23, who knows her path to a lifetime of cozy top government jobs. She happily does as he is told by her masters.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 47 - Posted by: lancelink1, 11/16/2012 3:45:42 PM     (No. 9019098)

I see you´re all enjoying "Survivor- Mordor On The Potomac". So Petraeus is kicked off the island. Who will it be next week? Oooo can´t wait to watch........

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 48 - Posted by: bighambone, 11/16/2012 3:53:55 PM     (No. 9019111)

It should be no secret to the morons in Congress that it was the Obama crew who changed the talking points, as Obama has been removing all references to Muslims and terrorists from just about everything that happens. Remember what happened at Fort Hood when a Muslim yelling "gos is great" murdered a group of US soldiers, the Obama crew called it an instance of workplace violence!

After the smoke clears, and if he plays the game, Petraeus could well get another job with the Obama crew, he does not want to mess that up, and besides his spouse still holds down a $178,000.00 a year job with the Obama crew in Washington, DC and he does not want any "revenge" to be taken against her.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 49 - Posted by: xcenturion, 11/16/2012 4:56:31 PM     (No. 9019227)

Susan Rice, even being considered for the position if Secretart if State is laughable. But under this corrupt administration, probable.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 50 - Posted by: Browneyes, 11/16/2012 4:57:22 PM     (No. 9019228)

# 46, Yes, I wish Mr. King would cease so many tv appearances. Perhaps, he has been appointed the "designated" speaker by the House, but....

I still believe Hillary has a lot of dirt under her fingernails and just maybe it was she who recommended Amb.Rice.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 51 - Posted by: BetseyRoss, 11/16/2012 5:10:59 PM     (No. 9019249)

I am sure that Peter King did not tell everything that was said in that committee hearing. We can start to figure this out ourselves. All we need is a smoking gun to prove that the Preezy is the guilty one. The question remains why he ordered the stand down because it could have only been him. What was happening in Benghazi that he didn´t want to be known. The more events unfold with Israel, it becomes clear that this was planned if Obama won. The fix was on. This is just plain ugly and frightening.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 52 - Posted by: Emerson, 11/16/2012 5:12:30 PM     (No. 9019255)

Re #46, Rep. Peter King is the chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, which I believe is one of the committees holding these hearings.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 53 - Posted by: JoElla Bee, 11/16/2012 5:17:08 PM     (No. 9019265)

No, #46, Joe Wilson shouted "you lie",
not Peter King.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 54 - Posted by: ann, 11/16/2012 5:28:26 PM     (No. 9019280)

#26....That´s the real question!!!...WHO ordered the stand-down.....WHO....When will we have the answer!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 55 - Posted by: Ida Lil, 11/16/2012 5:29:52 PM     (No. 9019283)

has it yet sunk in that closed door testimony is used to keep the suspects from knowing what is going to hit them and prevents them from twisting the facts?
kept in the dark the targets often panics and destroys their own selves.
For all anyone knows waiting was protecting lives such as family and opposing candidate.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 56 - Posted by: Emerson, 11/16/2012 5:33:35 PM     (No. 9019288)

Re #53, in addition to his chairmanship of the House Homeland Security Committee, King also sits on the House Intelligence Committee before which Petraeus appeared today. He is very involved in the Benghazi investigation and an excellent spokesperson.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 57 - Posted by: geoguy, 11/16/2012 6:03:19 PM     (No. 9019334)

The real issue is who told our troops to stand down. You and I know who, but getting it pinned on Zippy will be impossible.

Next, no one altered anything. It is a made-up lie. Think about it. By blaming an unknown person, it allows Petraeus to provide distance for Zippy in this whole mess and provides cover for Rice, who Zippy has a grand designs for her career.

Also, FTA:

"The original talking points were much more specific about al-Qaeda involvement and yet the finals ones just said´ indications of extremists."

Apparently from the article, the CIA didn´t mention anything about a video. OK, then who instilled the idea of a video causing the riot that was espoused by Rice et al (including Zippy)?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 58 - Posted by: walcb, 11/16/2012 6:03:33 PM     (No. 9019335)

With what authority does the UN ambassador speak on attacks of our consulate in Libya? She should have no superior knowledge of what took place over there so why did she make the rounds on Sunday? Obviously she was serving as the spokesperon for Obama who chose to hide behind the skirt of a black woman for cover. What a cowardly piece of work he is. Winnow through the possible candidates to speak on the Libyan attack and you can easily see why she was chosen.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 59 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 11/16/2012 6:11:40 PM     (No. 9019349)

The Dems and Zero will politicize your grandmother, the weather, large sodas, McDonalds´s - and four dead Americans.
Is anyone surprised?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 60 - Posted by: trapper, 11/16/2012 6:20:39 PM     (No. 9019369)

By Petraeus´s own admission today he knew at the time of his testimony on 9/14 that the video story was at best a deliberate misdirection, and at worst an outright lie. So at the time of his original testimony on 9/14 his integrity had already been compromised. He had already been brought into and was an active part of the coverup conspiracy, so he would not have been surprised by the story Rice was spreading on her 9/16 talk show tour. We aren´t going to get the full truth out of these people short of a full-on CIA interrogation. You get the bucket, I´ll get the towel.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 61 - Posted by: Holeymoses, 11/16/2012 6:25:30 PM     (No. 9019373)

Did they happen to ask you General P, why you originally said the video did it? This little factoid says more to me about you than romancing the Spider woman.

Since you are off the White House Christmas list, does wife Holly get to keep her big salaried job? (Is she as qualified for the post as much as Moochelle was back in Chicago?)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 62 - Posted by: OhMy, 11/16/2012 6:53:31 PM     (No. 9019431)

Obama has said publicly that he ordered that all necessary measures (or some such wording) be taken to protect americans in Libya. Obviously it was Valerie Jarrett who overruled him and sent out the orders to stand down. If anyone comes after Valerie Jarrett the chivalrous Obama will come to her defence reminding everyone to come after him and leave the lady alone.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 63 - Posted by: rplat, 11/16/2012 7:18:27 PM     (No. 9019485)

nobody cares . . . they´ll just continue to stumble along in total confusion and nothing, absolutely nothing will be done.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 64 - Posted by: O.G.´s Mom, 11/16/2012 7:43:28 PM     (No. 9019525)

Okay so Petraeus testified and did a 180. Big deal. Now what? I agree with above posters. A corrupt press that is still carrying Zero´s water, a totally non-engaged majority electorate, another 4 years of "I Won", and a castrated Republican leadership and this story gets out how? Nothing to see here. Move on.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 65 - Posted by: ragu, 11/16/2012 7:53:23 PM     (No. 9019541)

Re #65 Unfortunately, I think it is up to us to get the story out. Tell everyone you know.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 66 - Posted by: larryp, 11/16/2012 8:18:14 PM     (No. 9019573)

If Obama gets another couple of Justices as he might, the succession amendment will go the way of the dodo. Thus Obama will run again in 2016 and win,
and we will be stuck with these hacks for yet anoter term

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 67 - Posted by: Aria, 11/16/2012 9:18:03 PM     (No. 9019636)

#17

Listening to the Mark Levin show on the way home tonight I heard a story about a young man who knows an illegal who voted Obama. The illegal said "sucks to be you, great to be me". This illegal works, votes himself benefits, and thinks it´s funny.

The bus loads of Somalians - who can´t even read but were helped to vote - all the illegals for whom "providing ID would just be too terrifying", and all the others who vote themselves other people´s money just prove that our ancestors were correct: the republic will last until people figure out they can vote themselves money.

Romney would have been a great POTUS for those of us who believe in paying our way - and we were outvoted ergo the republic will not last.

There will be a revolution and I believe that is what Obama wants. And my personal opinion is he wants to convert the US to Muslim rule. I think Obama believes that Allah has parted the waters for him to enact this. And with what he´s gotten away with so far I can understand why he thinks this.

These are desperate times.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 68 - Posted by: ArtieC, 11/16/2012 9:59:10 PM     (No. 9019703)

"an inter-agency process."
That´s like saying a "computer error". Or "the dog ate my homework. " Somewhere in all three of those, a human was involved.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 69 - Posted by: lil dotty, 11/16/2012 10:00:39 PM     (No. 9019707)

The Gen did good. His agenda might have been to lay a trap for the DC demorats...the high ones, catch them ALL (the high placed commies) and then spring the latch to leave them with their pants down. If so, he has succeeded getting them down to their briefs..or boxers as the case me be. ´Betraeus´, not so fast Mr Chan.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 712317




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "drive"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "drive"



Why The Feds Chickened Out
On A Nevada Ranch
Townhall, by Kevin McCullough    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/13/2014 11:55:18 AM     Post Reply
Let me obliterate a bit of confusion here: the Obama administration attempted to go to war with a rancher in Nevada. Let me amplify a little bit of truth: They tucked tail and have returned home. And let me add a bit of clarity: they had no choice! As the nation began to become familiar with the plight of the family of Cliven Bundy, many of us harkened back to another standoff in which the Federal government attempted to bully it´s outcome: Waco, Texas and the Branch Davidian massacre. It is telling that in the Nevada case the feds pulled out so

The man who says he gave the Internet
‘Heartbleed’ talks about his mistake
Washington Post, by Gail Sullivan    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/11/2014 2:25:09 PM     Post Reply
On New Year’s Eve in 2011, software developer Robin Seggelmann was in front of his computer trying to work out some kinks in the security software most of the Internet uses. That’s when he made a mistake, which led to one of the worst bugs ever in the Internet known as “Heartbleed,” a flaw in the security infrastructure (OpenSSL) for a large swath of the Web. Nowadays, it’s unusual for someone to step up and take responsibility, But Seggelmann, a German developer, did just that.

Obamacare exit strategy brings
endless waits on hold
Washington Times, by Drew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/11/2014 8:29:43 AM     Post Reply
I never wanted to be a pawn in President Obama’s absurd and irresponsible attempt to mandate, regulate and complicate the American health care system. Unfortunately, there wasn’t much of a choice. I was a casualty of Mr. Obama’s Big Lie. You know the one: “If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.” By the time my plan vanished, the only individual health insurance plans available had been captured by the tentacles of Obamacare. Signing up for insurance under Obamacare was harder than making sense of Donald Trump’s hair. It took more than 20 attempts over

What is the ´Heartbleed´ bug? Understanding
the major Internet security breakdown
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/11/2014 8:27:04 AM     Post Reply
NEW YORK — Millions of passwords, credit card numbers and other personal information may be at risk as a result of a major breakdown in Internet security revealed earlier this week. The damage caused by the "Heartbleed" bug is currently unknown. The security hole exists on a vast number of the Internet´s Web servers and went undetected for more than two years. While it´s conceivable that the flaw was never discovered by hackers, it´s nearly impossible to tell. There isn´t much that people can do to protect themselves until the affected websites implement a fix. Here are answers to some common questions about

HHS Secy Sebelius Resigns; Pres
Obama Discusses Live at 11am
Fox News, by Clint Henderson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/11/2014 8:25:05 AM     Post Reply
Embattled Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has resigned. The President will formally announce the resignation during our show today. He will nominate budget director Sylvia Mathews Burwell to replace the controversial HHS Secy. Sebelius has been the face of Healthcare.gov and the botched rollout and has survived withering criticism.. until now. We´ll have analysis plus we´ve put together a panel to discuss what changes we´ve seen to health care as a result of the ACA so far. A House committee voted yesterday to hold former Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner in contempt for refusing to answer its questions about

Rupert Murdoch on his divorce,
succession, and his empire´s future
CNN, by Patricia Sellers    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/11/2014 8:22:20 AM     Post Reply
Fortune-"I had a very bad month in January and February. I had a fall in San Francisco. I fell on my head," says Rupert Murdoch in an exclusive interview with Fortune Magazine that covers the gamut of the media titan´s latest challenges. In the Q&A, released today and featured in Fortune´s April 28 issue, Murdoch talks about splitting his global media conglomerate into two public companies, struggling to repair frayed relationships with his grown children, luring eldest son Lachlan back into the business, and enduring a high-profile divorce from Wendi Deng, after a 14-year marriage. And even as he´s coped

Social Security, Treasury target taxpayers
for their parents’ decades-old debts
Washington Post, by Marc Fisher    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/11/2014 8:18:40 AM     Post Reply
few weeks ago, with no notice, the U.S. government intercepted Mary Grice’s tax refunds from both the IRS and the state of Maryland. Grice had no idea that Uncle Sam had seized her money until some days later, when she got a letter saying that her refund had gone to satisfy an old debt to the government — a very old debt. When Grice was 4, back in 1960, her father died, leaving her mother with five children to raise. Until the kids turned 18, Sadie Grice got survivor benefits from Social Security to help feed and clothe them.Now, Social Security

Short on accomplishments, Hillary leans
on Bill and Barack to sell candidacy
Washington Examiner, by Byron York    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/11/2014 8:15:53 AM     Post Reply
Last week Hillary Clinton gave what appeared at first to be a rambling and unfocused answer when asked to name the proudest achievement of her four years as Secretary of State. The short version is, she doesn´t have one. But Clinton´s words make a lot more sense when seen not as a non-answer to a specific question but as an effort to lay the foundation and establish a theme for a presidential campaign. The occasion was her appearance on a panel discussion at the "Women in the World" meeting in Manhattan. It was pretty easy going; the moderator, New York

Budget Chief Is Obama’s Choice
as New Health Secretary
New York Times, by Michael D. Shear    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/11/2014 8:13:19 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Even when Sylvia Mathews Burwell was in her early 30s, friends speculated that she might return to her native Hinton, W.Va., and run for governor someday. After all, she had been a Rhodes scholar, and her mother — who later became mayor of Hinton, population 2,600 — had driven her daughter’s interest in politics. So far that has not happened, but plenty of other things under two presidents have. On Friday, President Obama is to nominate Ms. Burwell, currently director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, to take over one of the largest and most unwieldy

Stephen Colbert to replace Letterman
Entertainment Magazine, by James Hibbard    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 4/10/2014 12:10:39 PM     Post Reply
Official: Stephen Colbert is the new host of CBS’ Late Show. Release: The CBS Television Network today announced that Stephen Colbert, the host, writer and executive producer of the Emmy and Peabody Award-winning “The Colbert Report,” will succeed David Letterman as the host of THE LATE SHOW, effective when Mr. Letterman retires from the broadcast. The five-year agreement between CBS and Colbert was announced by Leslie Moonves, President and CEO, CBS Corporation, and Nina Tassler, Chairman of CBS Entertainment. Letterman, the legendary, critically acclaimed host of the CBS late night series for 21 years, announced his retirement on his April 3 broadcast. Colbert’s

Some upset with upcoming change to
messages on Facebook mobile app
Los Angeles Times, by Salvador Rodriguez    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 4/10/2014 11:38:42 AM     Post Reply
Facebook began notifying users of its mobile app Wednesday that it will soon disable the app´s messaging feature. The Menlo Park, Calif., tech giant is instructing users to download the Facebook Messenger app -- a distinct entity from its main app -- if they wish to continue messaging friends from their smartphones. The Facebook Messenger app has been available for a number of years, and users who have both apps installed already can only message others through the separate app. But soon, all users will be forced to download the second app if they want to be able to message friends. VIDEO: Unboxing

NY health boss resigning after agency
failed to inspect abortion clinics
New York Post, by Pat Bailey and Carl Campanile    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/10/2014 7:37:01 AM     Post Reply
State Health Commissioner Dr. Nirav Shah is stepping down amid criticism over his agency’s failure to conduct regular inspections of abortion clinics and for delays in releasing a long-awaited fracking study. Word of Shah’s resignation late Wednesday came as the Health Department announced it was scrambling to inspect 25 abortion clinics ”within the coming days” — after The Post reported that it hadn’t visited many of them in more than a decade. The abortion clinic controversy also became a political hot potato for Gov. Cuomo when GOP gubernatorial



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Meet the Clinton shoe-thrower
65 replie(s)
NBC Universal, by Emma Margolin    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 4/12/2014 5:03:17 PM     Post Reply
Who throws a shoe? Honestly! That would be 36-year-old Alison Ernst of Phoenix, Arizona, who was charged Thursday night with disorderly conduct by the Las Vegas Police Department after allegedly throwing a shoe at former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. According to NBC News, who spoke with a Secret Service official, the U.S. Attorney’s office has declined federal prosecution. Ernst was wearing shoes on Thursday night when she attended a speech Clinton was giving in Las Vegas, but apparently brought an extra one specifically to throw at the former secretary of state. The official said the incident appeared to be “premeditated.”

Bundy Ranch, the Federal Government,
and the Nevada Water Tipping Point

61 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Monica Morrill    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 4/12/2014 7:29:42 AM     Post Reply
Many Americans have been watching with great consternation the ongoing struggle between the Federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Marshals against Cliven Bundy and his family. There are no signs of either side relinquishing their position. Many onlookers have been informed that this dispute is over protecting the desert tortoise. But it is nothing of the sort. In fact, the reality of the dispute goes far underneath what is being talked about. The more appropriate source of the dispute is ground water as well as surface water -- this is a war over water. Cliven Bundy and his

Nevada Cattle Rancher Wins
´Range War´ With Feds

42 replie(s)
ABC News, by Liz Fields    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/12/2014 3:33:27 PM     Post Reply
A Nevada cattle rancher appears to have won his week-long battle with the federal government over a controversial cattle roundup that had led to the arrest of several protesters. Cliven Bundy went head to head with the Bureau of Land Management over the removal of hundreds of his cattle from federal land, where the government said they were grazing illegally. Bundy claims his herd of roughly 900 cattle have grazed on the land along the riverbed near Bunkerville, 80 miles northeast of Las Vegas, since 1870 and threatened a "range war" against the BLM on the Bundy Ranch website after one of

Barbara Boxer Says Keystone
Pipeline a Cancer Risk

38 replie(s)
Breitbart California, by William Bigelow    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/12/2014 6:54:45 PM     Post Reply
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) is now accusing the Keystone pipeline of being a cancer risk. Her first point was that the pipeline “will bring 830,000 barrels of dirty tar sands oil into our nation every day.” She then segued to point #2 by asserting that the heavy tar sands oil will put people who live near refineries at risk for cancer: Significantly higher levels of dangerous air pollutants and carcinogens have been documented downwind from tar sands refineries, and in these areas people are suffering higher rates of the types of cancers linked to these toxic chemicals, including leukemia and

Why The Feds Chickened Out
On A Nevada Ranch

36 replie(s)
Townhall, by Kevin McCullough    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/13/2014 11:55:18 AM     Post Reply
Let me obliterate a bit of confusion here: the Obama administration attempted to go to war with a rancher in Nevada. Let me amplify a little bit of truth: They tucked tail and have returned home. And let me add a bit of clarity: they had no choice! As the nation began to become familiar with the plight of the family of Cliven Bundy, many of us harkened back to another standoff in which the Federal government attempted to bully it´s outcome: Waco, Texas and the Branch Davidian massacre. It is telling that in the Nevada case the feds pulled out so

President Obama stands by Rev. Al Sharpton
while accusing Republicans of trying
to restrict the right to vote

35 replie(s)
New York Daily News, by Celeste Katz & Annie Karni    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 4/12/2014 7:02:39 AM     Post Reply
President Obama stood Friday with the Rev. Al Sharpton and accused Republicans of trying to keep millions of Americans from voting, in a fiery speech days after new revelations about Sharpton’s past as an FBI informant. “The right to vote is threatened today in a way that it has not been since the Voting Rights Act became law nearly five decades ago,” Obama told the annual convention of Sharpton’s National Action Network in Manhattan. Obama’s appearance represented a presidential seal of approval of Sharpton’s role as a civil rights activist, amid the new revelations about how Sharpton used a wire to record

Why Hillary v. Jeb Would
Be Great for America

34 replie(s)
Daily Beast, by Mark McKinnon    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/13/2014 6:11:32 PM     Post Reply
They’re both qualified, respectful of each other (shocker!), and represent the vast majority of middle America. So what’s not to like about another Clinton/Bush race for 2016? When you mention the prospect of Clinton vs. Bush 2016 a funny thing happens. First, there is the reflexive response: "Oh no, not again. We don´t need more dynastic politics in this country." But upon further reflection, you realize Jeb Bush vs. Hillary Clinton would be a great race and actually good for the country. Let´s review. QUALIFICATIONS—THEY’VE BOTH GOT THEM. Barack Obama won the presidency because in an election where the premium was on change, it mattered little

The world must shift to solar and wind
power rapidly to avoid catastrophic global
warming, say UN scientists in major report

31 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Ben Spencer    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/13/2014 7:15:31 PM     Post Reply
A rapid shift to wind and solar power is needed if the world is to avoid catastrophic global warming, the United Nations warns in a crucial report today. Emissions of greenhouse gases need to be cut by up to 70 per cent before 2050 to control climate change, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says. ‘Large-scale changes in energy systems’ are required, with coal power stations to be switched off and replaced by wind and solar. And the transformation needs to be made in the next 15 years or controlling climate change will become increasingly harder and more expensive. The report was published

Nevada GOP removes social issues from platform,
moves ahead with pre-primary endorsements

29 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Sandra Chereb    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/13/2014 3:48:58 PM     Post Reply
LAS VEGAS — The Nevada Republican Party stripped opposition to abortion and gay marriage from its platform Saturday as state convention delegates instead focused on judging fellow Republicans on their worthiness to serve in office and adherence to GOP values. The platform, with few changes, was adopted overwhelmingly as the Las Vegas convention stretched late into the evening. The vote mirrors that of the Clark County GOP, which voted earlier to remove platform language defining marriage as between a man and a woman and statements opposing abortion. Many Republicans are re-evaluating their strong stances on conservative social issues as public

Goodbye tea party, hello big tent
28 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/13/2014 5:08:01 AM     Post Reply
Say what you will about Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), but they know a train wreck when they see it. They also know when to separate themselves from the cranks and the losers on the right. Although both supported the shutdown and were heartily supported by tea party groups in their own Senate races, neither one has endorsed Matt Bevin in Kentucky, Milton Wolf in Kansas or Chris McDaniel in Mississippi. In fact, Cruz’s office confirms he hasn’t endorsed anyone in the primaries. He may weigh in after the primaries. Rand Paul has endorsed two very establishment

Video: Flash mob of women steal
$20,000 worth of sunglasses
from California store

27 replie(s)
New York Daily News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/13/2014 10:50:38 AM     Post Reply
A brazen flash mob has been caught on camera storming a California store and making off with $20,000 worth of sunglasses. Surveillance footage shows eight women piling into a Sunglass Hut and crowding around display cases. Shielding workers from what they´re doing, they quickly stuff dozens of fashion specs into their bags. A store clerk pleads with them to stop, before running out of the shot to get help and dial 911. The thieves then all bolt outside and escape in a waiting SUV. The incident occurred at the Valencia Town Center mall, in Santa Clarita, at 3 p.m. on

Democrat Center Folds
25 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: real fifi- 4/13/2014 7:44:30 AM     Post Reply
It’s hardly been a secret that in recent years the moderate center of the Democrat party has been driven away and what remains is a conglomeration of disparate blocs which, to date, the party has been able to treat as if there were no conflicting interests between them. As the midterm elections approach and the administration’s incompetence, along with the distaste for the president’s signature ObamaCare legislation, drive the party’s chances down further, the make-believe coalition of opposites may well crumble if the opposition doesn’t blow it. Democrats hope to retain control of the Senate and recapture the House by driving


Post Reply   Close thread 712317





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS