A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Mark Levin on Lessons Learned
in Presidential Election: ‘We
Ought to Nominate a Conservative’

Cybercast News Service, by Penny Starr

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/15/2012 9:58:25 AM

Speaking at an event at the conservative Heritage Foundation on Wednesday, Mark Levin said conservatism is the key to winning the presidential race. “Well, first of all, the lesson we’ve learned is from time to time we ought to nominate a conservative,” said Levin, author, radio host and president of Landmark Legal Foundation. Levin was interviewed by Ed Meese, who named Levin chief of staff when he was serving as attorney general during the Reagan administration. “What lessons should we draw from (the election) as conservatives and what reasons do we

Comments:
When will the Republicans finally figure that out? The question is will the establishment RINO´s ever allow that to happen. The Tea Partiers are now considered "insurgents" and extremists because they support all the right things. It´s very discouraging.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: rational, 11/15/2012 10:02:39 AM     (No. 9015853)

Yes,
and Newt ,Michelle and Rick warned us we needed a conservative to fight.... as the elites like Karl Rove and idiot Kristol circled the wagons for Mitt.


Reply 2 - Posted by: supersid, 11/15/2012 10:06:40 AM     (No. 9015866)

Michelle (who barely won her house seat!) and Rick? Yeah, Akin and Mourdock on a 50-state scale. Gingrich? Donald Trump? That 9-9-9 whatshisname? Yep, the darlings of conservatives would have done better than Romney.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: yuban, 11/15/2012 10:08:32 AM     (No. 9015873)

The GOP hates Conservatives more than they hate the Left. The elites would rather run a losing Party than to be followers in a winning Party.


Reply 4 - Posted by: bella, 11/15/2012 10:16:58 AM     (No. 9015893)

Dittos # 3


Reply 5 - Posted by: mgwitt, 11/15/2012 10:18:52 AM     (No. 9015901)

The give to me folks in large cities out number the working class. Plain and simple.


Reply 6 - Posted by: CEP, 11/15/2012 10:22:45 AM     (No. 9015914)

Yes we do need Conservatives, start answering those who are calling Conservatives extremists, start fighting back.


Reply 7 - Posted by: hoosiergirl71, 11/15/2012 10:22:52 AM     (No. 9015915)

NO ONE as a GOP candidate could have won this election. I believe Romney won if the votes had been fairly counted. This election was in the bag before the ballots were cast. The people voted for Romney but the machines voted for Obama.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: hector67, 11/15/2012 10:24:57 AM     (No. 9015920)

If we can´t win the elections anymore it is time for atlas to shrug. It won´t be easier, but it would be the most effective way. When we stop pulling the wagon it will stop.


Reply 9 - Posted by: 68BattleofBealeVet, 11/15/2012 10:26:58 AM     (No. 9015924)

I have been saying this for years. They always run the most liberal rat they can find so why don´t we run the most conservative of our lot.

Romney is a fine man and would have made a great leader. However, I´m not going along with a moderate next time. I´m not kidding this time.


Reply 10 - Posted by: tisHimself, 11/15/2012 10:27:19 AM     (No. 9015925)

But it was his turn.

Now, I´m sure its Jeb´s turn.

The future belongs to Palin, Ryan and Jindal. And Susana Martinez.


Reply 11 - Posted by: tangerinedream, 11/15/2012 10:28:14 AM     (No. 9015929)

Ditto #2. No one, not one of the Republicans who ran in the primaries, stood a chance against THIS administration.
By all means, let´s eat our own once again, shall we?
Before the election was even over, Democrats were gleeful in their predictions that the Republican Party would be at each other´s throats on 11/7. (Kinda makes one wonder what made them so sure Obama would win.) All the same, in this case they were right. Sad.


Reply 12 - Posted by: rational, 11/15/2012 10:31:22 AM     (No. 9015940)

#2
Neat trick bringing up sideshow issues the media hounded day in and day out.
On the national stage, Newt would have eviscerated Obama in debate #1 2 AND 3 and choke Obama with Benghazi and place his corrupt administration around his neck....and then he would have made sure the voting apparatus wasn´t sabotaged....and then he would have....
it goes on forever. Mitt waited around to be annointed and was shocked as he!! when he wasn´t.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: beancounter, 11/15/2012 10:32:46 AM     (No. 9015945)

This reminds me of the professional football or basketball drafts. Do you choose based on the position where you have a need or do you choose the best overall player available.

We didn´t have very good conservatives available in this draft. Next time we´ll have a whole lot of good conservatives available (write it down now: Kasich will be on the ticket in 2016).


Reply 14 - Posted by: beancounter, 11/15/2012 10:34:22 AM     (No. 9015949)

One more thing:

Wouldn´t you have loved to have seen Gingrich in the debates with Obama?


Reply 15 - Posted by: 6ironejd, 11/15/2012 10:34:43 AM     (No. 9015951)

When conservative Republican candidates talk social issues, they lose. When they don´t, they win.


Reply 16 - Posted by: coldoc, 11/15/2012 10:35:08 AM     (No. 9015953)

The republicans like mccain,boehner and mcconnel have more in common with democrats like pelosi than conservatives. Considering who is "running" the country now, I fear it will become a moot point in the next 12-18 months. There may not be much left to govern. In the long run, we may be happy that we lost and removed ourselves from economic ground zero.


Reply 17 - Posted by: JAN, 11/15/2012 10:45:19 AM     (No. 9015999)

His rantings are getting boring.

Go away, stop hawking your books, and stop telling us how brilliant you are.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Country Boy, 11/15/2012 10:50:14 AM     (No. 9016017)

Have to disagree. If this was a legal election (not massive voter fraud), my dog could have beat obema.

I do not believe that, with this much fraud, ANYBODY in the country could have beaten obeme.


Reply 19 - Posted by: gesundheit, 11/15/2012 10:59:34 AM     (No. 9016048)

What the Republicans need is a presidential candidate with the courage to declare BEFORE Election Day that unless the decent hard-working, taxpaying citizens of America vote Republican, Obama will win the election because of the trillions of dollars of ´gifts´ he´s made to low-income voters, the unions, etc., etc., during his first term.

Instead, Republicans had a candidate this year who waited until AFTER the election to opine, ´´Obama won the election with ´gifts´ to low-income voters,´´ etc.

It would probably help if Republicans, whether in office or the media, stopped using the euphemism ´´spending´´ when accusing Democrats of ´´taxing and spending,´´ when what they are really doing morning, noon, and night is taxing and BRIBING.


Reply 20 - Posted by: caddyjak, 11/15/2012 11:11:33 AM     (No. 9016101)

As usual Levin is on the right track. Priebus was totally inept. But the main problem is that an immoral, totally fraudlent, anti-American (probably muslim), cocaine user and seller, gay, poorly educated, forced to surrender his law license, totally unvetted by the RNC even though 900 mil was spent in mostly silly ads, greedily spending over 500 mil in lush vacations and parties was NEVER exposed to an ignorant electorate which would have probably reacted and either stayed home or voted Republican.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Freeloader, 11/15/2012 11:32:29 AM     (No. 9016168)

Nominate a conservative Professor Levin? What the GOP really needs to counteract the leftist, heathen Dark Siders, who now have a stranglehold on American Civilization, is a modern day Attila The Hun!


Reply 22 - Posted by: TexaTucky, 11/15/2012 11:51:14 AM     (No. 9016219)

#15, the problem with that oft-repeated line of logic . . .

Mitt DIDN´T talk social issues.

He lost anyway.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: chumley, 11/15/2012 11:58:13 AM     (No. 9016256)

The more I look back on my lifetime, the more I see the Republicans were NEVER conservative. They were just less liberal than the Democrats. Even when we got Republican victories, we rarely got the civil liberties or our money returned. Usually they just took more, differently.
Now they have lost to the most corrupt and inept Communist in the history of the nation. Even with the massive voter fraud, it should have been a slam dunk. It wasn´t.
Its past time to unload that dead weight and see if we cant get a coalition of conservatives and libertarians together, and really sell our ideas. What can it hurt? All we do is lose now anyway.


Reply 24 - Posted by: absalom, 11/15/2012 12:32:53 PM     (No. 9016368)

#23 is correct. Since WH Taft, the party rank and file have remained true to conservative principles; while the GOP elites have been in the pocket of ´big business´ whose interests have absolutely nothing to do w/these principles. The GOP is a carcass who has had many funerals but badly needs a burial.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Wetlandz, 11/15/2012 12:33:57 PM     (No. 9016371)

Ronald Reagan couldn´t have won this election. True conservative, fake conservative, rino, Wake up! It was the obAma Claus effect. The get out the vote ground game and the unions who lied saying they weren´t helping Obama and did the most damage.


Reply 26 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 11/15/2012 12:44:18 PM     (No. 9016395)

Like Rick Santorum? Or Akin? Christine O´Donnell? Mourdock? Sharon Angle? Chris Christie? Hang up the phone, ya big dope!


Reply 27 - Posted by: absalom, 11/15/2012 1:09:25 PM     (No. 9016461)

#25, a vociferous demurral. The likes of Disraeli, von Bismarck, TR, Lady Thacher, Ronald Reagan, among others; were instinctive politicians anchored in core principle which translated into their politicial genius. Willard Romney, a trendy lefty squish w/o any core principles will never, ever be confused with any of them. He stood for anything, everything and nothing; all in the same sentence and the voters grasped this in their bones. This was a very winnable election against arguably the worst POTUS in our history. But doofus Romney, the worst possible choice, was the nominee w/decisive defeat predictible.


Reply 28 - Posted by: stopstoreload, 11/15/2012 5:25:22 PM     (No. 9016960)

Nonsense. Anybody who is not a Democrat or Dem suppoter should vote for whoever the Repubs nominate. This is us versus them. If you don´t show up to vote no matter who the Republican candidate is, the evil Dems win.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Malia2012, 11/15/2012 7:56:45 PM     (No. 9017173)

I agree with #2 and #17. IMO it´s past time to stop beating up on fellow Republicans and work TOGETHER! What a concept!


Reply 30 - Posted by: 49 Ford, 11/15/2012 9:17:40 PM     (No. 9017274)

I wish that one of the "true" conservatives on this thread who so joyously trashes Mitt Romney could explain how any one of his primary opponents could have done a better job?

And anyone who thinks that one of the other GOP hopefuls could have beaten Obama is living in a fantasy world. An old, snarly white guy with [bleep]loads of personal baggage like Gingrich? Good Grief, just take an honest look at the coalition of idiots, moochers, libertines and clueless wonders who gave Obama his majority, and you have to conclude that Mitt did the best anyone could to bring people over.

Romney would have been a fine president, a principled leader for the world we live in today. It is unfortunate that some on our side don´t realize that. But that´s OK with them - they´ll continue to live in an alternative comic book universe in which some imaginary conservative superhero swoops in to save the day.



Post Reply   Close thread 712108




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Krauthammer: Obama "Essence Of Exactly
The System That He Denounced And He
Promised He Would Messianically Redeem"
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 11:37:06 AM     Post Reply
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: There´s a larger issue here, which I think you´re overlooking. CHRIS WALLACE: No doubt. KRAUTHAMMER: I just have to get that in. I mean, Obama runs in 2008 as the man who is going to change our politics. You know, he is only going to implement new ideas, he is going to change the way Washington works. And the essence of the corruption he was attacking was the money. So, number one, in ´08, he is the first who refuses public financing for his campaign, he raises a billion dollars. And now what he is doing,

Obama: ‘We Still Waste Money in
All Kinds of Things That Don´t Work’
Weekly Standard, by Jeryl Bier    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 11:11:44 AM     Post Reply
At a Democratic National Committee fund raising event in Atherton, California Thursday morning, President Obama declared that the United States government still needs to get its fiscal house in order: We still waste money in all kinds of things that don´t work, and we have the capacity to shift those dollars into things that do work and that will grow our economy. And we can reduce our deficit, stabilize our debt, and do so without sacrificing the kinds of investments that are going to be required to grow. During his remarks, the president spoke of the

Controversial Preacher Removed
from Diversity Day Program
Fox News, by Todd Starnes    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 11:08:11 AM     Post Reply
Michael Pfleger, the controversial Catholic priest who made racial remarks about Hillary Clinton and defended Louis Farrakhan, has been removed as a keynote speaker at a diversity day event sponsored by a federal government agency. A spokesperson for the Broadcasting Board of Governors told Fox News that Pfleger’s office has been notified that his invitation to address the group has been rescinded. “This is an event that is meant to celebrate inclusiveness and diversity,” spokesperson Lynne Weil told Fox News. “It was deemed by our senior management that it was not appropriate to have him as a speaker.”

Students Want Anti-Gay Priest
Removed from University
Fox News, by Todd Starnes    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 11:04:03 AM     Post Reply
Religious liberty groups are mobilizing to defend the chaplain of George Washington University’s Newman Center after gay students launched an effort to have the priest fired because he preaches against homosexuality and abortion. “It’s discrimination against Catholics,” said Patrick Reilly, president of the Cardinal Newman Society. “Secular colleges are fast becoming a very unsafe place for Catholics who hold true to their faith. This is a very, very sad situation.” Two gay students at George Washington told the GW Hatchet student newspaper that they want Father Greg Shaffer removed from campus

Carney: Obama´s fundraising push for
Pelosi in Calif. a ´traditional exercise´
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Justin Sink    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 10:43:22 AM     Post Reply
White House press secretary Jay Carney on Thursday defended President Obama´s fundraising swing through California, saying that despite "rhetoric from the other side" critical of the president, his push on behalf of Democratic Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was "a traditional exercise." "I think it’s important to note that -- because you’ve seen a lot of rhetoric from the other side suggesting that there is something wrong with that -- that Republican leaders in the House and the Senate have been out raising money for Republican candidates;

First key fight in immigration battle
is what to name the reform bill
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Molly K. Hooper    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 10:39:00 AM     Post Reply
One of the first political issues negotiators must tackle in crafting an immigration reform bill is among the most important: what to name it. It’s a decision that will bruise egos, create legacies and deeply affect subsequent messaging battles. “Every time the bill is mentioned in the press, you either have a brand that´s positive or a brand that doesn´t mean anything or even hurts you,” said Frank Sharry, the executive director of the pro-immigration reform group America’s Voice. The wrong name, he warned, could doom a good bill. “If there´s not a

Psychiatrist warned campus
police about Aurora shooter
a month before mass murder
Hot Air, by Ed Morrissey    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 10:05:18 AM     Post Reply
In a revelation that may have Colorado voters rethinking their state’s push on gun control, court documents revealed that the mass shooting in Aurora that killed 12 and injured 70 more could have been prevented by law enforcement. The psychiatrist for suspect, James Holmes, had warned campus police that Holmes was dangerous and homicidal a month before the shooting took place. Lynne Fenton even told the police that Holmes had begun to stalk and threaten her, and yet no action was apparently taken: A University of Colorado psychiatrist told campus police a month before the Aurora

Rep. Peter King attacks Sen.
Marco Rubio for voting against
Sandy funding
Washington Times, by Seth McLaughlin    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:58:55 AM     Post Reply
Rep. Peter King of New York on Friday cast Sen. Marco Rubio as a hypocrite for voting against the the Hurricane Sandy relief package and expressed disbelief that the Florida senator would then turn around and try to raise campaign money in the region. Mr. King questioned how Mr. Rubio could vote against the $60 million in relief for New York and New Jersey when Florida has received loads of federal money for Hurricane victims. “Guys like Marco Rubio of Florida, with all the money that you people have gotten in Florida over the years, with every hurricane

Attorney General Eric Holder:
Jail time for blacks is too long
Washington Times, by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:53:14 AM     Post Reply
Attorney General Eric Holder expressed “concern” Thursday evening that black men are unfairly served with longer prison sentences than white men and that America’s prison system demands overhaul. “Too many people go to too many prisons for far too long for no good law enforcement reason,” Mr. Holder said, in remarks to the Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network in New York, Politico reported. “It is time to ask ourselves some fundamental questions about our criminal justice system. … It is time to examine our systems and determine what truly works.” Mr. Holder said in the Politico report

TV news ´lies´ about
Obama, ex-speechwriter says
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:48:55 AM     Post Reply
President Obama and other Washington politicians are getting a bum rap on TV news as money-grubbers and power-grabbers, views the president´s former top speechwriter calls lies, especially those aimed at his former boss. Jon Favreau told students at Harvard University´s Institute of Politics that TV portrays political leaders wrongly, and that the public ends up with a bad view of those in power. "I think that a lot of people turn on the news today, a lot of young people, and they hear people tell them that every motivation of every politician on either

Obama has “no coherent
message” for the Arab world
Washington Examiner, by Sean Higgins    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:42:23 AM     Post Reply
Joyce Karam, Washington correspondent for pan-Arabic daily Al-Hayat, offers a sobering assessment on the Al-Arabiya website of the current administrations efforts in the post-”Arab Spring” Middle East. She begins by noting a how a minor recent diplomatic walkback highlights the White House’s contradictory policy: It was only fitting that the U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry announces another traditional trip to the Middle East on the same day that the U.S. embassy in Cairo withdraws its tweet advancing the case for Egyptian Comedian Bassem Youssef as he faces intimidation from the Mursi government.

Democrats have doubts
about Obamacare too
Washington Examiner, by Brian Hughes    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/5/2013 9:38:46 AM     Post Reply
President Obama is eager to build public support for his health care overhaul in the few months remaining before its implementation, but waning enthusiasm from Democrats threatens his effort right out of the gate. Two-thirds of Democrats now believe Obama´s health care reforms will either hurt them personally or have no effect on their daily lives, a Quinnipiac University poll released Thursday shows. In comparison, just 27 percent of Democratic respondents said the reforms would help them. The president has long struggled to convince independent and Republican-leaning voters that his health care blueprint would lower premiums and expand insurance coverage.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We Are Living in
a Dying Country

92 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 4:53:10 PM     Post Reply
RUSH: Folks, I don´t know how else to categorize this. We are living in a dying country. I don´t know how else to categorize what´s happening -- 88,000 new jobs. The unemployment rate, because of a terrible statistic, is down to 7.6%. The number of people in this country who are not working is shameful. Ninety million Americans are no longer in the workforce. Ninety million. People not in the labor force grew by 663,000, and now 90 million. That´s the labor force participation rate. This is 1979 levels.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
54 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

53 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

Hillary Clinton: The clock is turning
back for women in America

38 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:25:20 PM     Post Reply
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explained to the Women in the World summit in New York today that the clock is turning back for women in America. Clinton praised her own mother for helping empower her to success and marveled at the opportunities that her own daughter Chelsea has pursued. But Clinton warned that there is still so much to do to promote women´s rights in America. "As I look at all these young women that I am privileged to work with, or know through Chelsea, and its hard to imagine turning the clock on them," Clinton said.

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

38 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

37 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

37 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

White House Blames Jobs
Numbers on Sequester

36 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM     Post Reply
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look

Trayvon Martin´s parents
settle wrongful death claim

32 replie(s)
Orlando Sentinel, by Rene Stutzman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:15:25 PM     Post Reply
SANFORD - Trayvon Martin´s parents have settled a wrongful death claim for an amount believed to be more than $1 million against the homeowners association of the Sanford subdivision where their teenage son was killed. Their attorney, Benjamin Crump, filed that paperwork at the Seminole County Courthouse, a portion of which was made public today. In the five pages of the settlement that were available for public review, the settlement amount had been marked out. Lower in the agreement, the parties specified that they would keep that amount confidential. When asked during an earlier interview whether the amount was


Post Reply   Close thread 712108





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS