A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Obama won the election with ´gifts´
to low-income voters, young Americans
and minorities, says Romney in explosive
post-mortem of the GOP 2012 campaign

Daily Express [UK], by Hayley Peterson

Original Article

Posted By:Attercliffe, 11/15/2012 1:33:43 AM

Republican Mitt Romney attributes his election loss to President Obama´s ´gifts´ that he bestowed on minorities and young people during his first term. In a conference call with his national finance committee on Wednesday, Romney said Obama´s win was buoyed in large part by loyal Democratic constituencies including the poor that he had promised ´free health care,´ the immigrants that he had protected from deportation and the college-aged women that he had offered free contraceptives. ´You can imagine for somebody making $25,000 or $30,000 or $35,000 a year, being told you’re now going to get free health

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Country Boy, 11/15/2012 1:50:11 AM     (No. 9015280)

And I think he hired the guy who photoshopped his Birth Certificate to re-write the software that counts the votes.


Reply 2 - Posted by: question_complexity, 11/15/2012 2:43:47 AM     (No. 9015295)

It is not the free contraceptives. What do they cost? $15/month?

The Democrats talk about the aftermath of sex all the time because it implies to a young (single) woman that she needs to worry about this a lot.

"Obama is really concerned about my having sex. He must think I have a lot of sex. He must think that men find me very attractive. Obama thinks I´m sexy. I feel sexy when I think about Obama and the Democrats. I know what Lena Dunham is talking about. I´m going to vote now."

Why do you think Obama won the single woman demographic so handily? He made them feel sexy.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: ccyr, 11/15/2012 3:05:12 AM     (No. 9015302)

why is this "explosive?" Every President buys votes by showering their constituencies with taxpayer money. French political philospher Bestiat said it best in his work "The Law"(very short, wise and readable work). Once people can tax others and distribute it to themselves, elections are just contests to see which side´s cronies get the loot.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Spidey, 11/15/2012 3:06:40 AM     (No. 9015304)

Obama also bought a lot of votes by taking over the student loan industry and doling out billions in living expense money to students.There´s a big chunk of these people that don´t even belong in college but are there just to get the extra money on top of the tuition costs.

Their only way out of the massive debt they´re piling up is loan forgiveness. The left has dreamed of free college for decades because of their indoctrination techniques and creating a farm system for future government workers..

Now, on top of this Obama wants to raise taxes $1.6 trillion (for starters)to create thin air jobs for these grads.


Reply 5 - Posted by: TruthandJustice, 11/15/2012 3:09:08 AM     (No. 9015305)

There is something you can do...

THERE IS SOMETHING YOU CAN DO...THE ELECTION HAS NOT YET BEEN CERTIFIED...

SO OBAMA HAS NOT WON YET....

make the calls....Donate to Allen West...the only guy standing with a pair...he is our David vs. Goliath....exposing the theft of his votes...will expose the rampant national vote theft...the theft of a presidential election by an evil cabal of communists...

SPEAK NOW ...OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE

http://thecompetentconservative.com/elections-have-not-yet-been-certified-heres-what-you-can-do/


November 12, 2012 | 2 Comments
Elections Have Not Yet Been Certified, Here’s What You Can Do

If you´re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!





These elections are NOT certified yet. The only way to get this investigated, much less recounted or overturned, is through the Secretary of State of each of the five key states: Florida, Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. EVEN IF YOU ARE IN ANOTHER STATE you can help. But it won’t do any good to dilute our effort to challenge California or Michigan or other states. Until a major group gets involved to do more, here is the plan:
Contact the Secretary of State of the state in question. (See contact information below. Please provide others in COMMENTS.)
Send them the press clippings, or personal testimonials of clear vote fraud witnessed. (Statistical aberrations are helpful too like a historical 50% turnout in 2004, 2008 but a 90% turnout in a specific precinct despite an overall LOWER state turnout.)
Demand a public recount AND investigation, with a commitment to fight to replace THEM in the next election if they do not do so.
Email/Phone/Visit EVERY WEEK if not EVERY DAY. This will take weeks of steady pressure to get them to move.



Reply 6 - Posted by: Mike PHX, 11/15/2012 3:54:28 AM     (No. 9015316)

Here´s some "walkin´ around" money. ´N heres some true true slide.
Rahm Emanuel


Reply 7 - Posted by: pineledger, 11/15/2012 4:02:02 AM     (No. 9015320)

6, would you translate that second gift?


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: stopstoreload, 11/15/2012 4:47:43 AM     (No. 9015342)

This could be seen coming when the federal government effectively cut banks out of the college fund lending process. It provided funds the government could use to buy votes, and stuck the taxpayers to pay the cost of sloth, miscalculation, and improvidence.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Trigger2, 11/15/2012 4:56:48 AM     (No. 9015345)

That´s exactly why my granddaughter voted for the jerk. She bought into his promise to pay off her college loan so she wouldn´t have to.


Reply 10 - Posted by: AGGW, 11/15/2012 5:21:58 AM     (No. 9015357)

Paying off student loans is not fair to those who have already paid theirs. Maybe they should ask for a refund.


Reply 11 - Posted by: tisHimself, 11/15/2012 5:27:30 AM     (No. 9015367)

For a guy who earned the nomination by drowning his opponents in negative ops whispering, negative advertising and purchased caucuses, there is a certain karma in not being able to buy what the other guy already bought.

Let´s not let this happen again.


Reply 12 - Posted by: wordstress, 11/15/2012 5:57:06 AM     (No. 9015391)

Romney is merely speaking the truth here. And it´s not "explosive" but commonly known.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: clayusmcret, 11/15/2012 6:07:16 AM     (No. 9015401)

23 March 1775, Patrick Henry said "Give me liberty or give me death." Fundamentally reversing that position on 6 November 2012, the American people said "Give me welfare, government managed healthcare and free cell phones. I´m entitled!"


Reply 14 - Posted by: Muguy, 11/15/2012 6:29:28 AM     (No. 9015416)

I participated in an election and all got were lies, give-a-ways, higher taxes, the promise of lower valued retirement dollars on money I´ve saved....

and I didn´t even get a lousy t-shirt!


The graft and corruption and bait and switch pandering to the lowest interests of divided groups worked--to out detriment.


Reply 15 - Posted by: raphaela, 11/15/2012 6:53:20 AM     (No. 9015444)

Romney needs to demand a recount. I´m more and more convinced that Romney won the election by both popular and electoral standards. All the Democrats had to do was ensure the votes for certain cities and they did that by cheating. We need to ask for a recount not for secession.


Reply 16 - Posted by: HotRodLincoln, 11/15/2012 6:54:22 AM     (No. 9015446)

And we laughed at the Indians who sold Manhattan to the Dutch for 60 Guilders?


Reply 17 - Posted by: bpl40, 11/15/2012 6:55:07 AM     (No. 9015450)

Not knowing why you lost is the best indicator of why you lost. Every Democrat gives these gifts. Romney and his advisers deliberately alienated the conservative grass roots and Tea Party to curry favor with liberals. Any future Republican nominee who does that will also lose. When will they learn and admit it.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: M2, 11/15/2012 6:58:10 AM     (No. 9015453)

If Romney won 59% of the white vote, that means Obama won 41% of the white vote.

Please tell me what Obama offered to that many white voters when he distinctly wrote them off by ignoring them during the campaign and in fact, disdaining them.

This is making massive voter fraud a more and more likely scenario.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Kitty Myers, 11/15/2012 6:59:46 AM     (No. 9015457)

We fall into that "$25,000 or $30,000 or $35,000 a year." But we can´t be bought because we consider our freedom to be priceless.

Btw, remember when $25K was a great salary?


Reply 20 - Posted by: Janjan, 11/15/2012 7:28:49 AM     (No. 9015492)

The Democrats have spent years finely honing their ability to create victims and them offer them taxpayer booty. It works. Young college students are inundated with political correctness, socialism and class warfare hatred that started in kindergarten because we have let the leftists and teachers unions take over the education of our children. That works too. Throw in some targeted voter fraud that the Republicans refuse to even acknowledge and you have the perfect recipe for a permanent Democrat majority. The only way out is for the country to hit bottom, all social programs to be wiped out financially, and a couple of suitcase bombs detonated by terrorists in urban areas. And this will all likely come to pass.


Reply 21 - Posted by: LZK, 11/15/2012 7:32:38 AM     (No. 9015495)

I agree -- donate to Allen West -- he´s the only one pushing back on an illegal election count....

I had to change my obama vote on the computer screen twice before it registered President Romney....

LZK


Reply 22 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 11/15/2012 7:42:01 AM     (No. 9015513)

Dear Mr. Franklin:

You were right. We have become a greedy lot. We (some of us, but less than half of us) are sorry.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: joeyinempirestate, 11/15/2012 7:44:11 AM     (No. 9015516)

What do these sex-obsessed young single women see in a limp-wristed fop like o?


Reply 24 - Posted by: rabbit, 11/15/2012 7:45:55 AM     (No. 9015520)

#18, while I voted for Romney, I know a lot of white voters who voted for Obama. Most are very concerned about their fellow citizens who don´t have access to health insurance, who care for a loved with a disability, who are homeless, etc. The Republican disdain for those who truly need a hand doesn´t sit well with a lot of people. When you pack a school backpack with food on Friday afternoon so a young child will have something to eat over the weekend, Republican words about "moochers" and "drifters" seem rather callous.

No, this isn´t a perfect world. Yes, there are some people getting something for nothing when they shouldn´t. But there are also plenty of people right now truly in need. During the Great Depression, neighbor helped neighbor. Now, most people expect government to supply. If more Republicans got involved with food banks, programs to help the jobless find jobs, etc. we could make true in-roads.


Reply 25 - Posted by: DadOf4, 11/15/2012 7:55:21 AM     (No. 9015537)

#24 - With all due respect, it is individuals such as yourself who greatly contribute to the "evil" conservative meme.

You state, "The Republican disdain for those who truly need a hand ..." Please provide precise examples of such.

By implying Republicans do not volunteer at Food Banks or help the unemployed is beyond disgusting. Every single study that has been done shows that conservatives, by a very huge margin, donate more of their time and money to charitable causes than do the liberals.

Perhaps, if folks like you spread the truth to their fellow voters, we wouldn´t be where we are as a country.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Aunt Agnes, 11/15/2012 7:56:45 AM     (No. 9015540)

Re: No. 18´s post - I know where some of that white vote came from. I know a few losers who actually blame REAGAN for their lives going off the rails. They like striking back at anyone who has more than they do. They feel small & powerless & BO is their "advocate" bully who will put their enemies in "their place!" I know a hypochondriac who allegedly has a bad back. She spends most of her time in a wheelchair & tells everyone sad stories about how those "mean doctors" tell her NOT to sit in the wheelchair, get more exercise & won´t GIVE her the back surgery she needs! She thinks BO is going to MAKE the doctors operate. Start calling BO voters what they really are = Thieves & BEGGARS!


Reply 27 - Posted by: nimby, 11/15/2012 7:57:38 AM     (No. 9015542)

How cheap are American lives ( umm votes)!


Reply 28 - Posted by: rplat, 11/15/2012 7:57:51 AM     (No. 9015543)

That´s precisely what Obama did. He bought the social parasites with our money and won the election. Sad but true.


Reply 29 - Posted by: LAW428, 11/15/2012 8:06:58 AM     (No. 9015568)

Don´t discount voter fraud. When O gets more votes than there are registered voters, there´s something "rotten in Denmark."

All Marxist/Socialists are perpetuated by fraud at the ballot box. The Occupier in the WH is a thief; what he is not is a valid President. Remember, he congratulated and admires Hugo Chavez.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Passion, 11/15/2012 8:11:14 AM     (No. 9015573)

#9, I hope you tell your grand daughter about reality when you explain she is now out of the will.

#24, go away troll.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Daisymay, 11/15/2012 8:15:52 AM     (No. 9015581)

Romney is exactly right. Problem is, nothing is going to change. Look for EVERY election to go Democrat because Democrats will increase the free stuff every election year. The fact that 40% of Whites voting for Obama is stunning. Not sure I believe that happened! I think there was a lot of voter fraud in the Urban areas. It doesn´t matter WHO Republicans run, the Democrats will win. They baked that cake 20 years ago when they began to let the Illegals in by the thousands. Those Illegals now have ADULT children who are Legal and they VOTE!


Reply 32 - Posted by: TexaTucky, 11/15/2012 8:23:54 AM     (No. 9015596)

#24, the disdain you attribute TO Republicans is a misunderstanding. Yours. The disdain is FOR Republicans.

You know, the ones who actually provide the food at the food banks that liberals only staff at holidays for a day or two to make themselves feel better.

The ones who tithe to their churches which not only run food banks but also give clothing to the poor and run job finder programs for the jobless and build houses for the homeless and provide a whole host of other services through their Christian charities.

Don´t give us this sanctimonious slander about callous Republican disdain when it is the Republican Atlas who is holding the world on his shoulders. When WE shrug, let´s see how long the compassionate but phony altruism of the Left keeps this world spinning.


Reply 33 - Posted by: Catherine, 11/15/2012 8:24:41 AM     (No. 9015601)

He also won because the GOP insisted on Romney as our candidate. They ignored the way people were voting during the primary. They knew best. All here who even mentioned Palin or any other Republican were scorned by some. And from what I hear, they still haven´t figure it out. I blame them more than Obama for what´s going on today because they sat and let it happen.


Reply 34 - Posted by: chillijilli, 11/15/2012 8:25:39 AM     (No. 9015603)

#4 and others: Watch for the Student Loan Bubble to collapse in 3-5 yrs, EXACTLY like the housing bubble did.
Having lived as an expat for +10 yrs, I know from experience that once socialism gets it´s ugly toe in the door, it´s impossible to stop. Denmark tried to stop it once and immediately socialists were reelected bc the voters demanded all their free stuff again. Never mind that people couldn´t afford cars bc of the high taxes (>60% I think) or that a cup of coffee was $8---they demanded their entitlements be returned.
One of our kids lives in the UK, and needed a basic endoscopic exam last year. Free, of course, but the wait time? 2 YEARS! He had private insurance so could have it done the next day.
Euro socialism has crept in, and America will never be the same again.


Reply 35 - Posted by: lifelonghuman, 11/15/2012 8:31:47 AM     (No. 9015620)

Mitt is right, but it was not presidential for him to say it.


Reply 36 - Posted by: John c, 11/15/2012 8:35:34 AM     (No. 9015629)

Mitt, go public. Any money left over from the campaign, use for a regular radio monthly report. Go on Beck, Levin and other programs. Give obama heartburn.
Take an opposition role against this Marxist.
Give some leadership.


Reply 37 - Posted by: Eheu Fugaces, 11/15/2012 8:35:54 AM     (No. 9015631)

#24 - It is beliefs like yours that have created a permanent, dependent underclass sunk in self-pity and sloth. Contrary to what you want to believe, we conservatives are in favor of RELIEF -- most people run into crises in their lives where a helping hand is needed. We are willing to help out till the crisis is over, but not permanently, where the recipient wants living off our charity to become a permanent lifestyle. We are also in favor of helping those who are so mentally and/or physically defective that they cannot support themselves.

What you are advocating, however, is that anyone who presents a piiful enough front has a permanent license to pick my pocket any time they think they need something -- like a free cell phone with cell phone service paid up.

You, and most Democrats, have spent the last 80 years in a frenzy of nostalgia for the Great Depression, when supposedly everyone pulled together and was joyous in mutual want and misery, and people let the Democrats have unlimited control. This "memory" of the Idyllic Depression is as phoney as accounts of happy slaves singing as they chopped cotton on the ole plantation.


Reply 38 - Posted by: Judith, 11/15/2012 8:36:42 AM     (No. 9015634)

Sadly, for us all, I think the postmortem is that the USA is no longer. The country we THOUGHT existed, voted on nov. 6 and showed that it had cast away the Constitution, free enterprise, independence and any connection to what originally made this country great.


Reply 39 - Posted by: Pros7767, 11/15/2012 8:37:17 AM     (No. 9015636)

#17, shame on any Tea Party member who didn´t vote this year. This election was too important.

Even if you didn´t like Romney, this was an ABO vote. Too late now.


Reply 40 - Posted by: dolphin, 11/15/2012 8:42:14 AM     (No. 9015650)

Now that no one buys our votes,
the public has long since cast off its cares;
for the people that once bestowed commands, consulships,
legions, and all else, now meddles no more and
longs eagerly for just two things -- bread and circuses. --Juvenal (c.55-c.128 AD), Satire


Reply 41 - Posted by: owl, 11/15/2012 8:56:15 AM     (No. 9015681)

Read Dr. Sowell and our comments at Am Spec today if you´re wondering why Romney failed , or it is at least another take . I must agree with Uncle Rush again that you can´t compete with Santa Claus or Haniity´s take : a spoiling parent wins out over a disciplining one .


Reply 42 - Posted by: southernboy, 11/15/2012 8:56:39 AM     (No. 9015685)

#4 "...Obama also bought a lot of votes by taking over the student loan industry and doling out billions in living expense money to students.There´s a big chunk of these people that don´t even belong in college but are there just to get the extra money on top of the tuition costs…."

Right on the money! What´s the first thing some 25-40ish person does when they lose their job? ´Go back to school…´ This gives them a ´student loan´ to buy a car, sign an apartment lease, buy a flat screen and Playstation, living expenses.. in return they have to pretend to attend college taking a few hours of sop courses with little to no supervision as to how the money is spent. A way of marking time in their lives while they ´get back on their feet.´ All the while feeling noble because they are ´furthering their education.´


Reply 43 - Posted by: pigop, 11/15/2012 9:02:08 AM     (No. 9015703)

Man, Benjamin Franklin must be turning in his grave! "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." ~ BF


Reply 44 - Posted by: buckhorn_cortez, 11/15/2012 9:23:42 AM     (No. 9015757)

If voter fraud is such a big deal - why is the GOP virtually ignoring it? Oh yeah - they don´t want to "make waves."

There´s not enough "eck" in the word feckless to describe my disgust for the GOP and their lack of fight for what their supposed to believe. No more donations for you...


Reply 45 - Posted by: NancyBee, 11/15/2012 9:43:29 AM     (No. 9015816)

Whose bread I eat,his song I sing.


Reply 46 - Posted by: BetseyRoss, 11/15/2012 9:45:25 AM     (No. 9015820)

Romney knew what he had to face, why didn´t he do more about it? Heck, we all knew what he had to face. I thought he was OK until I worked the polls that day. We acquired new territory to our precinct about 3 years ago. We have had at least 4 elections since then and since I signed up to work there. We had almost a 70% turn out that day. We also had every handicapped person in our precinct turn out . Our chief was busy all day helping them vote which involved taking the voting machine over to a table so that they could get to it easier and not have to lean on the voting machine. We had young people voting for the first time. Mostly those kids come in with their families, but not this time. Young single women showed up, too. Some very old people showed up(FDR types that were old enough to remember him and how much he gave away) and they happily voted for Obama. Except for the very young women that voted their lady parts all of the others think they are going to be saved by Obamacare. Yet, they didn´t understand that they will be the ones that will be given the pill and told to go home. It broke my heart to see this. They didn´t get it that they will receive less care than they do now.
Even with all of these new voters, Romney won 2-1.


Reply 47 - Posted by: JAN, 11/15/2012 9:57:38 AM     (No. 9015842)

The morons were fooled once and they happily went to the polls to be fooled twice.

Romney is right but didn´t go far enough.

He forgot to mention the voter fraud.

Even with that he nearly won the election.


Reply 48 - Posted by: wwsweet, 11/15/2012 10:00:15 AM     (No. 9015844)

This is the problem in glaring clarity -- stop bashing the people whose votes you want. Until Republicans learn that, they lose.

Students, young voters, minorities -- need to be lured by what´s reall good for them as in a vibrant economy and jobs so that that far outweighs the appeal of free phones and birth control. Rather than insulting big voter blocs by sneering at them, draw them in with beter ´freebies´ as in freedom vs. authoritarianism, jobs vs. stagnation, substnace vs. style.

And WOMEN are the biggest voter bloc of all -- as long as there are Todd Akins and Richard Mourdocks in the Republican party --the party will lose, not just those individual candidates. WOMEN are 52% of the electorate and Obama won their vote by 12%. Hispanics ecmprise only 10% so Republican men need to learn that even conservative women don´t want to be told they must have a baby that´s the result of rape because that´s what God wants.

As long as that comment is associated with Republicans, no matter how remote the utterance - it will contaminate the entire party. It courses through the collective female conscious and unconscious, and causes women to revolt. Women who have been lifelong Republicans recoil from that one comment in huge numbers.

Mitch Daniels suggested at the beginning of the elction to leave the social issues aside and focus on the other core conservative issues -- economy, taxes, jobs, growth, etc. Figure out how to do that -- get the right hip PR and ad people, not the trolls who thunder on about abortion and gay issues.

And Evangelicals and other arch arch arch conservatives: ZIP IT.


Reply 49 - Posted by: arkfamily, 11/15/2012 10:08:24 AM     (No. 9015872)

I read the comments from #24 and I am disgusted. Giving is not something that should be supplied by the government. Charity comes from the heart and that is why we have churches and organizations to help with people who are less fortunate. Cheerful giver? That isn´t going to happen when you have government mandating that you have to hand over your earnings that you worked hard for. The earnings that you had to get up at 5am to work for.

It is also disgusting that #24 generalized Republicans in that manner. Did you take a look at Mitt Romney´s charitable giving in comparison to Barack Obama´s giving. Apply your comments to Democrats as well.


Reply 50 - Posted by: Proud American, 11/15/2012 10:18:30 AM     (No. 9015899)

It dawned on me this morning ....

1 nitwit, 535 knuckle heads and a handful of army brass with the inability to control their baser instincts ...all who live in a swamp in a small area of this great nation are making the decisions for the rest of the 330 million strong populous - half of whom are on the take which leaves about 115 million actual contributers and law abiding citizenry.

Have I got that right? Is this the BEST we can do my fellow Americans?

Really when you consider the sheer ridiculousness of my figuring it is mind boggling isn´t it? But if I am correct, these are the facts on the ground as the nation lurches toward oblivion and the world is on the verge of WWIII.

I think that is it in a nutshell.....tut tut who knew our end would be at the hands of 1 nitwit, 535 knuckle heads and a few army brass who can´t manage a zipper....


Reply 51 - Posted by: 4LadyK, 11/15/2012 10:20:46 AM     (No. 9015910)

#5, 15, 21 & 29 get it. He did win. There is massive, documented, proven voter fraud in every swing state. Votes are STILL being counted. Romney lost many key states. By only tens of thousands if votes where there was over 100% turn-out.
To me, the most demoralizing thing is Romney just rolling over and conceding to Obama in the face of proven voter fraud. I´m shocked & disappointed he isn´t fighting for the presidency and our country. He has failed himself, us, and the country. He ended up being no better than McCain in that aspect.


Reply 52 - Posted by: artlover, 11/15/2012 10:37:55 AM     (No. 9015965)

We knew before he was elecion, that Obama would win any way it took. Now, we know that he is going to turn this country into a communist country to where we have no say into who governs us or how they govern. We are no longer a free country and you will see that the people who voted for Obama will be yelling the loudest because there will be no free goodies for them to have - we will not have any - anymore. We are doomed. We are doomed!!!!!


Reply 53 - Posted by: RancherJack, 11/15/2012 10:43:59 AM     (No. 9015994)

OMG

Romney even more delusional than I thought

Folks, you will never see another counter-Party President. It will be all Dems fom now on.

If, this is the way top level Republicans think.

Wow. Wowowowowow.


Reply 54 - Posted by: dbdiva, 11/15/2012 11:00:51 AM     (No. 9016051)

Ditto: #49 & #51

I am more than happy to support others who are TEMPORARILY down on their luck and need a boost to see them through a rough patch. But I have no Christian duty to provide a cradle to grave living for those who won´t do anything for themselves; those who would´t take a job even if one was offered to them on the proverbial silver platter.
I saw a poll taken in Great Britain where in 300,000 households not one person had ever held a job. When they were asked about that, they just said they received their government checks and they were content enough with that. There was no real reason for them to work. If GB has 300,000 such households you have got to know we also have that many or most likely many more.
The Lord does not like the word ´idle´ no matter how it is spelled. I´m fed up with the socialists who run around yelling ´WWJD´ asserting that HE would want us to pay for everything for everyone.
I wish they would tell me where in scripture Jesus told the people to go back to their villages, sit in their doorsteps, and wait for Rome to deliver their supplies.
I´ve been searching the Bible for some time and have yet to find that verse(s).



Reply 55 - Posted by: dman, 11/15/2012 11:03:07 AM     (No. 9016058)

I´m with the other posters who say it was simple voter fraud. Chicago politics taken to a new level.

Mitt and the RNC are still clueless. Allen West is among those who have it right.

W.A.S.S.


Reply 56 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 11/15/2012 11:31:05 AM     (No. 9016167)

I nominate #24 for sainthood! s/o


Reply 57 - Posted by: NotaBene, 11/15/2012 11:33:45 AM     (No. 9016169)

Demagoguery is an ancient practice. Hussein gave gifts right form the beginning. The undeserving 47% appreciated their Food Stamps plus free telephone, free Obamacare, StudentLoans and Amnesty for illegal Mexicans.

General Juan Peron in Argentina did a similar thing. Seventy years later Argentinians keep electing Peronista governments. Obama understood this and did not care for the future of our country because at heart he is not an American. The 47% knew this but did not care. They just want their freebies.


Reply 58 - Posted by: tehtriggerman, 11/15/2012 11:34:10 AM     (No. 9016170)

in 2012 telling you what you dont want to hear AKA THE TRUTH. Is ´explosive´


Reply 59 - Posted by: TakeBackAmerica, 11/15/2012 11:41:35 AM     (No. 9016193)

Personality puss also did it by...

Appealing to progressives who hate and fear Republicans more than they value the future of their own country and who don´t know--or care--that Obama’s campaign slogan "Forward" is a traditional Marxist term.

Buying union votes with the $447 billion American jobs act that adds a half-trillion dollars in new debt for American taxpayers while reducing our Gross Domestic Product output and pushing our unemployment rate even higher.

Concealing the terrorist murder of four Americans at our diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya—and leveraging the Petraeus Affair--as a political expedience, and by

Stealing the election with traitorous levels of corruption that may never be fully known.

Also, Lab tech I spoke with yesterday and the Dentist I go to--both white--did not seem to care about the election results meaning the take over of the USSA by a Dictator-in-Chief, and what that means to us all.


Reply 60 - Posted by: a man over thirty, 11/15/2012 11:58:43 AM     (No. 9016263)

Democrats have been buying the votes of special interest and victim-groups for decades. Obama´s just carrying on a time-honored tradition.
We have officially become a nation of takers instead of makers - it´s all downhill from here.


Reply 61 - Posted by: bmw50, 11/15/2012 12:11:46 PM     (No. 9016310)

Charity should begin at the individual level, from the bottom up, not top down; kept at the lowest level possible.

But Democrats are not into church or charity or anything else that requires PERSONAL contributions or time. Just look at what Democrats give PERSONALLY to charitable groups and it is mere pittance compared to what Conservatives give. They are always busy telling everyone how THEY should be more charitable. Hypocrites!

Democrats are great as spending other people´s money but never their own, and showing up for a photo op at every opportunity, taking credit for any good deeds done. Democrats are Marxist and Marxist are on a quest for a multi-class society, where they are the leaders, the "ruling class"; where they have their supporters, the "entitlement class" that are totally dependent on the ruling class; and the "working class" they care nothing about, trying to fund it all.

So which are you?


Reply 62 - Posted by: drbulb, 11/15/2012 12:52:54 PM     (No. 9016417)

Republican "disdain" is for the people who believe (and the political party that insists) that welfare is a career choice rather than a safety net. And for the democrat socialist party types that enjoy hurling "WWJD?" in my face all the time I would ask them this: "WWMD?" (what would MARX do?) ´cause the answer is EXACTLY what their party and Øbama is doing...


Reply 63 - Posted by: wtm, 11/15/2012 1:04:46 PM     (No. 9016448)

If you think Obama phones are great, FREE internet service is on it´s way !!!!!

Another "FREEBIE" courtesy of the Obama USF fund !!!!


Reply 64 - Posted by: wexfordcounty, 11/15/2012 1:07:28 PM     (No. 9016454)

Give ´em hell, Mitt. Or, as Truman said, it´s the truth and they think it´s hell.


Reply 65 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 11/15/2012 1:12:30 PM     (No. 9016467)

I did not laugh at the free Obamaphone.I did not necessarily see that enough votes would be bought with stuff to swing the election but I knew it would help. I viewed it with worry.


Reply 66 - Posted by: O.G.´s Mom, 11/15/2012 1:18:39 PM     (No. 9016482)

#24 do you really think that this country is better off now with all of the welfare type programs that were expanded under Lyndon Johnson as his War on Poverty? What has started as a hand up has turned into a hand out and that´s what Republicans are wary of. Mitt Romney and his family donated more money to charity and spent more time volunteering than all the Dems put together. And that was when no one was looking. And he is typical of Republicans. Romney´s take on his loss, is right on the money. Rush calls it Santa Claus policies, and Mitt was more circumspect.

Now that the Santa Claus genie, so to speak, is out of the box, I don´t see how Republicans win again, unless we compromise everything we believe in, big time. It is very, very troubling.


Reply 67 - Posted by: arkfamily, 11/15/2012 1:38:07 PM     (No. 9016524)

Sorry for posting again but I wish we didn´t have to hear so often, "how are Republican´s going to win again." We will NEVER win if we keep believing that.


Reply 68 - Posted by: pixie1942, 11/15/2012 2:07:04 PM     (No. 9016581)

votes were prostituted and the cost was an obama phone. I´d rather have to use carrier pigeons than to prostitute my vote...


Reply 69 - Posted by: RightShoe, 11/15/2012 2:54:28 PM     (No. 9016679)

Wasn´t this obvious all along? Shouldn´t we have presented a constructive counter argument to the danger of this posture instead of just highlighting liberal ploy and assuming that everyone would clearly see how dangerous this is for our country?

Perhaps it´s because I´m from Arizona and I wasn´t bombarded with Mitt Romney ads, but I never heard Mitt Romney present any kind of positive message for the future blacks, Hispanics or young people. I can see why they don´t think we care about them.

They are wrong, but I can understand why they don´s see it.

Like him or not, Mr. Electable blew it on message.


Reply 70 - Posted by: Kismet, 11/15/2012 3:06:20 PM     (No. 9016709)

What #48 said, but sad to say, it will fall on deaf ears.


Reply 71 - Posted by: ChazzPalm, 11/15/2012 4:12:56 PM     (No. 9016860)

#13..."Give me...!" would suffice. Just "Give me!"


Reply 72 - Posted by: yorkiemom, 11/15/2012 5:55:58 PM     (No. 9016998)

Romney was right. And, here we are eating our own again. Just heard Dana Perino on The Five telling Romney to shut up and go away. Then, Bobby Jindal jumps on Romney for telling the truth. I´ve got news for Jindal. If he thinks he is going to win in four years, he will be smeared and lose even worse than Romney did. That´s what Dems do.


Reply 73 - Posted by: Jakester2344, 11/15/2012 6:08:25 PM     (No. 9017010)

Refusing to speak out about drilling holes in babys heads and sucking their brains.... Yeah thats the ticket to winning.


Reply 74 - Posted by: Quaestio, 11/15/2012 6:56:49 PM     (No. 9017079)

RR lost because the leftists have been planning this for decades and now control education, the media, and the bureaucracies. Voters are ignorantrant and fed lies. Ask around and see for yourself how many women voted for Obama because Romney was going to take away their birth control.



Post Reply   Close thread 712060




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"



How did a high school drop-out
become entrusted with the
government´s biggest secrets?
Daily Mail [UK], by Lydia Warren    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/10/2013 7:07:29 PM     Post Reply
The man behind one of the most significant leaks in U.S. history has revealed himself as a high school drop-out who turned against his government when he realized it was ´doing far more harm than good´. As Edward Snowden steps from the shadows to explain his reasons for leaking information from the National Security Agency, questions are emerging over how the failed student rose up the ranks to become gatekeeper of the government´s biggest secrets. Snowden, 29, spoke to The Guardian from a hotel room in Hong Kong where he is on the run after leaking sensitive documents on

Obama celebrates 50th anniversary
of the 1963 Equal Pay Act while
his White House pays women
employees LESS than men
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/10/2013 6:59:33 PM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama marked the 50th anniversary of the Kennedy-era Equal Pay Act on Monday with an energetic celebration, but women in his administration continue to earn significantly less than men. An analysis of his administration´s 2012 Annual Report to Congress on White House Staff shows that the median wage for female professionals in the Executive Office of the President was $9,000 less last year than for their male counterparts. Congress passed the law in 1963. ´The day that the bill was signed into law,´ Obama said, ´women earned 59 cents for every dollar a man earned on average

Mark Sanford, Lindsey Graham
disagree on data mining
Post & Courier [Charleston, SC], by Brendan Kearney, Robert Behre    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/10/2013 6:38:28 PM     Post Reply
News of two expansive U.S. surveillance programs has sparked a national discussion on security versus privacy and civil liberties. [Snip] U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, who serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the programs "very helpful for us when it comes to national security." U.S. Rep. Mark Sanford’s reaction was almost exactly the oppose. He said the data mining is "out of control" and has "no regard for constitutional rights." "I think that they’ve crossed a tripwire," Sanford said. "As a conservative, it’s more than alarming. And frankly, it’s very disturbing."

Vandals turn Prince Charles’s
dream village of Poundbury
into ‘Ugly Buildings’
Telegraph [UK], by Hayley Dixon    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/10/2013 8:48:59 AM     Post Reply
Now some practical jokers have made their view of the sustainable town clear, by altering a road sign to direct drivers heading to the development to the “Ugly Buildings”. Poundbury, an extension of Dorchester, the former county town, has polarised opinion since work began in the mid 1990s. The estate is famous for mixing different continental styles and for using non-local building materials, which has led to derision from many, including those in the architectural community who have criticised its toy-town style. Now one vandal with an eye for aesthetics has used the very public forum to express

´Crazy ants´ that feast on electronics
and are invading the U.S.CANNOT
be killed with normal insecticide
Daily Mail [UK], by Jessica Montoya Coggins & Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/10/2013 6:59:56 AM     Post Reply
A new and annoying species of ant is terrorizing the U.S. and chemicals that kill off other types of the insect are proving ineffective against it. The ´crazy´ ant, named for the erratic trail it leaves as it makes its way across the country, originated in Argentina and Brazil. But since it was first spotted in Houston in 2002, it has spread to some 21 counties in Texas, 20 counties in Florida and a few locations in Mississippi and Louisiana. University of Texas researcher and co-author of a study on the creatures Ed LeBrun said the omnivorous ants attack and

Could Hong Kong shelter
Edward Snowden?
BBC News [UK], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/10/2013 6:53:35 AM     Post Reply
Edward Snowden, who has identified himself as the source of leaks about US surveillance programmes, is believed to be holed up in a hotel in Hong Kong. Mr Snowden told The Guardian he flew to Hong Kong on 20 May, after leaking information about the National Security Agency´s surveillance programme. He said that he chose Hong Kong because the city has "a spirited commitment to free speech and the right of political dissent". Mr Snowden´s current whereabouts cannot be confirmed, and the Hong Kong government has not publicly commented on his case, although journalists are staking out various hotels in

The proud moment when I
realised I was worth hacking
Telegraph [UK], by Boris Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/10/2013 6:49:33 AM     Post Reply
Shock horror! Hold the front page. It turns out the internet is a gigantic snooperama, a sinister governmental periscope inside your most personal electronic possession--by which THEY can keep a watch on YOU. [Snip] My only question is: what on earth did you expect? I have never trusted the security of the internet, or emails, or indeed texts--because it was obvious from the very dawn of what was once called the information superhighway that any data you sent to some server or database or gizmo could no longer be in any sense private. It was no longer shared between

Prism: now we´re seeing the
dark side of Silicon Valley
and its authoritarian geeks
Telegraph [UK], by Mic Wright    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/10/2013 6:41:18 AM     Post Reply
When we talk about Orwell and 1984, it’s usually Winston Smith we’re focused on: the guy who realises things have gone terribly wrong, that he’s working for a corrupt and corrupting system. But what about the apparatchiks of Airstrip One who are entirely comfortable with the way things are, happy just to fit in, to prostrate themselves before the Telescreen? Those nameless functionaries sprang to mind when I read the thoughts of American technology evangelist Robert Scoble on the NSA Prism leaks. Unsurprisingly, the man who posted a picture of himself showering wearing Google Glass and recently rhapsodised

Edward Snowden has exposed
both the ambition and
the incompetence of
Obama´s security state
Telegraph [UK], by Tim Stanley    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/9/2013 9:28:17 PM     Post Reply
They said that if you vote Romney you’ll get a return to George W Bush. Well, Romney may have lost in 2012 but people got Bush all the same – Obama has cheerfully continued and expanded the authoritarian policies of Dubya. That’s the opinion of Michael Hayden, the former director of the US National Security Agency, who says that the state is bigger and more furtive than it was when Bush was in charge. It’s the kind of Right-wing talking point that would’ve been dismissed as a Right-wing talking point a month ago. But, in the light of the

Edward Snowden has blown
the whistle on this presidency.
You have to wonder: Will
Obama see out his full term?
Telegraph [UK], by Damian Thompson    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/9/2013 9:23:19 PM     Post Reply
"They could pay off the Triads," says Edward Snowden, the NSA whistleblower interviewed by the Guardian in his Hong Kong hideout. Meaning: the CIA could use a proxy to kill him for revealing that Barack Obama has presided over an unimaginable – to the ordinary citizen – expansion of the Federal government´s powers of surveillance over anyone. Libertarians and conspiracy theorists of both Left and Right will never forget this moment. Already we have Glenn Beck hailing Snowden on Twitter: Courage finally. Real. Steady. Thoughtful. Transparent. Willing to accept the consequences. Inspire w/Malice toward none.#edwardsnowden Snowden will be a Right-wing

Revealed: Google and Facebook DID
allow NSA access to data and were
in talks to set up ´spying rooms´
despite denials by Zuckerberg
and Page over PRISM project
Daily Mail [UK], by Steve Nolan & Daily Mail Reporter    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/9/2013 9:11:33 AM     Post Reply
Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook and Larry Page of Google both strongly denied giving unfettered access to user data to U.S. officials, but it turns out both companies have, in fact, cooperated with governments requests. Zuckerberg denied his company´s link to secret government data-sharing scheme PRISM on Friday in a blustery posted message that described allegations that Facebook gave ´US or any other government direct access to our servers´ as ´outrageous.´ Now, sources tell the New York Times that both Facebook and Google discussed plans to create secure portals for the government ´like a digital version of the secure physical rooms

Obama draws up plans for
cyber attacks on China as he
meets leader in California
Daily Mail [UK], by Associated Press & Rosemarie Lentini    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/9/2013 9:05:22 AM     Post Reply
Barack Obama has ordered senior intelligence officials to compile an overseas target list for U.S. cyber attacks. An unpublished presidential directive obtained by the Guardian reveals America plans to step up its cyber offensive capability in a bid to ´advance US national objectives around the world´. The news comes as Obama prepares to tackle the contentious issue of cybersecurity with China President Xi Jinping at day two of a summit in California today. The top secret Presidential Policy Directive 20, issued in October, outlines Offensive Cyber Effects Operations (OCEO) which can have ´subtle to severely damaging´ impacts on adversaries.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Edward Snowden has blown
the whistle on this presidency.
You have to wonder: Will
Obama see out his full term?

101 replie(s)
Telegraph [UK], by Damian Thompson    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/9/2013 9:23:19 PM     Post Reply
"They could pay off the Triads," says Edward Snowden, the NSA whistleblower interviewed by the Guardian in his Hong Kong hideout. Meaning: the CIA could use a proxy to kill him for revealing that Barack Obama has presided over an unimaginable – to the ordinary citizen – expansion of the Federal government´s powers of surveillance over anyone. Libertarians and conspiracy theorists of both Left and Right will never forget this moment. Already we have Glenn Beck hailing Snowden on Twitter: Courage finally. Real. Steady. Thoughtful. Transparent. Willing to accept the consequences. Inspire w/Malice toward none.#edwardsnowden Snowden will be a Right-wing

Rubio: In immigration reform,
legalization comes first.
‘It is not conditional.’

52 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Byron York    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/10/2013 1:07:52 PM     Post Reply
In a Spanish-language interview Sunday with the network Univision, Sen. Marco Rubio, the leading Republican on the Gang of Eight comprehensive immigration reform group, made his strongest statement yet that legalization of the nation’s 11 million currently illegal immigrants must happen before any new border security or internal enforcement measures are in place, and will in no way be conditional on any security requirements. “Let’s be clear,” Rubio said. “Nobody is talking about preventing the legalization. The legalization is going to happen. That means the following will happen: First comes the legalization.

NSA Leaker Is No Hero
42 replie(s)
Commentary Magazine, by Max Boot    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 6/9/2013 4:01:21 PM     Post Reply
That didn’t take long. The official who leaked top-secret information about the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs to fight terrorism has now come forward in the pages of the Guardian to revel in his role “as one of America’s most consequential whistleblowers, alongside Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley Manning.” Edward Snowden is described as a 29-year-old high school dropout who worked (ironically) on computer security for the CIA before becoming a highly paid contractor at Booz Allen, making a reported $200,000 a year working for the National Security Agency in Hawaii. The Guardian story presents him as a martyr

Bolton: NSA leaker Edward
Snowden is guilty of treason

42 replie(s)
WLSAM.com, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/10/2013 11:55:04 AM     Post Reply
(CHICAGO) There is a lot of reaction on WLS this morning to the identification of the man who leaked information last week, about the U.S. Government’s secret surveillance program, which allows the National Security Agency to monitor the phone calls and emails of Americans. Former U.S. Ambassador John Bolton told Bruce Wolf and Dan Proft on WLS that he thinks admitted leaker Edward Snowden, is guilty of treason: "Number one, this man is a liar. He took an oath to keep the secrets that were shared with him so he could do his job.

Why Schumer-Rubio is a Fraud-
The Nutshell Version

41 replie(s)
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 6/10/2013 6:09:57 AM     Post Reply
Mickey Kaus has produced an excellent, easy-to-use “pocket guide” to the reasons why the Schumer-Rubio immigration reform bill (S.744) is fraudulent. Kaus catalogues the provisions of the bill that promise tough future enforcement, etc. but don’t do what they pretend to do: “Multiple triggers” — Legalization is immediate. DHS just has to write border “plan.” The most any “triggers” can possibly do is delay green cards and citizenship. “90% effectiveness” — If not reached, triggers only toothless commission “Pay back taxes” — Only if already “assessed” by IRS (unlikely). Newly legalized may instead get refunds. “Learn English” — Only need to sign up

Sources: Pats to sign Tim Tebow
41 replie(s)
ESPN.com, by Ed Werder    Original Article
Posted By: Kingbubo- 6/10/2013 5:39:04 PM     Post Reply
The New England Patriots will sign Tim Tebow, league sources told ESPN. The Patriots are signing Tebow, who is expected to participate in the team´s mandatory minicamp Tuesday, as a quarterback, according to sources. The move reunites Tebow with Patriots offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels, who was the Broncos' head coach when Denver traded into the first round to draft the Heisman Trophy winner in 2010. Patriots head coach Bill Belichick often has spoken with admiration for Tebow's versatility, intelligence and character. Belichick covets what he has described as tough, smart, versatile football players.

The Scandal Dump is a Smokescreen.
40 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Philip Cowan    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 6/9/2013 10:40:03 AM     Post Reply
For several months, the Benghazi scandal lay dormant, apparently forgiven and forgotten. Then, inexplicably, it reared its ugly head when Congressmen Ron Johnson and Jason Chaffetz smelled Obama´s blood in the water. After feigning affliction with the flu, and then ostensibly tumbling down a carpeted stairwell resulting in an unconfirmed concussion, then-Secretary of State Clinton was finally forced to testify before Congress. Clinton´s desperate attempt to put the Benghazi scandal to rest with her now-infamous impassioned declaration -- "What difference, at this point, does it make?"

IRS manager: White House
not involved in reviews

37 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Philip Elliott    Original Article
Posted By: john56- 6/9/2013 4:12:39 PM     Post Reply
Washington - A self-described conservative Republican who is a manager in the Internal Revenue Service office that targeted tea party groups told investigators that he, not the White House, set the review in motion, the top Democrat on the House watchdog committee said Sunday. Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., released a partial transcript of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform interview with the unnamed manager in the IRS' Cincinnati office. In it, the employee said the extra scrutiny for tea party groups' tax exempt status was an effort to be consistent

In nation´s breadbasket,
Latinos stuck in poverty

36 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Gosia Wozniacka    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 6/9/2013 10:46:44 AM     Post Reply
FRESNO, Calif. — On a warm spring day, farmworker Cristina Melendez was bedridden and unable to make her way back into the asparagus fields of central California for the kind of backbreaking work she´s done since childhood. The 36-year-old mother of seven was desperate. Her bank account had been at zero for months, the refrigerator was nearly empty, and she didn´t have enough to cover the rent. Lacking health insurance, Melendez couldn´t see a doctor or afford medication, so her illness dragged on — and another day came and went without work or pay. A native of Mexico

Prosecute Snowden
35 replie(s)
National Review Online, by John Yoo    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 6/10/2013 8:13:20 PM     Post Reply
Edward Snowden should go to jail, as quickly and for as long as possible. This is a leak case that should be difficult for even Eric Holder to bungle. Snowden has already confessed in public to the crime of leaking classified information. He has said in public how he did it, that he did it with intent, and that he knowingly harmed our national security. Holder will finally find a leaker that he can prosecute. But given the Holder Justice Department’s record on the other leak cases, who wants to take a bet

Getting The IRS Out of Obamacare
34 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by David Bossie    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 6/9/2013 5:07:54 AM     Post Reply
As the IRS scandal continues to take shape and the massive overreach of one of the most powerful agencies in Big Government becomes even more apparent, it becomes frightening to think this same agency will soon be heavily involved in your personal healthcare situation. Remember folks, as the United States Supreme Court said nearly a year ago, Obamacare is a tax and thus falls under the jurisdiction of the IRS. (Snip) Georgia Congressman Tom Price has introduced the Keep The IRS Off Your Health Care Act of 2013 (H.R. 2009). The recently introduced legislation already has

China and Hong Kong Hold
Edward Snowden´s Fate

34 replie(s)
Atlantic, by Connor Simpson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/10/2013 5:36:00 AM     Post Reply
What happens next with the man responsible for leaking a trove of National Security Agency documents to the Guardian rests in the hands of two countries who could decide to send him back to the U.S. with express shipping, or to keep him as a global bargaining chip. Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old American defense contractor, revealed himself as the man responsible for the Guardian´s string of NSA leaks Sunday afternoon. Booz Allen confirmed he was an employee for the last three months. But, for now, he´s in a hotel in Hong Kong ordering room service and covering up


Post Reply   Close thread 712060





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS