 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Legal Pot Could Be Contagious
Reason, by Jacob Sullum
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:zoidberg, 11/14/2012 2:09:02 PM
|
| Shortly before the House of Representatives approved a federal ban on marijuana in 1937, the Republican minority leader, Bertrand Snell of New York, confessed, "I do not know anything about the bill." The Democratic majority leader, Sam Rayburn of Texas, educated him. "It has something to do with something that is called marihuana," Rayburn said. "I believe it is a narcotic of some kind." Seventy-five years, millions of arrests, and billions of dollars later, we are still living with the consequences of that ignorant, ill-considered decision, which nationalized a policy that punishes peaceful people and squanders taxpayer money in a
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
suziesuburbanite, 11/14/2012 2:30:42 PM (No. 9014288)
Legalize it, regulate it, tax it.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
4Justice, 11/14/2012 2:35:01 PM (No. 9014299)
All drugs were made illegal or heavily controlled because of one reason only...the alcohol lobby. Ironically, alcohol is much worse than most of the other drugs. It certainly causes more deaths, violence, family break-ups and other such problems than marijuana, or even heroin!
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Rafter, 11/14/2012 2:36:08 PM (No. 9014301)
Rocky Mountain High...
What about the revenue stream? Could next mebbe save State of Cowabunga from underwater status? "Zowie! It´s Maui Wowie! We´re saved!" "It´s... like... Acapulco... GOLD... man... We´re... GOLDEN... staters... again... Dude!"
Or not. But at least as Cowabunga drifts off into the Pacific... they´d have a peaceful easy feeling about it.
ShaZammm!
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
thethirdruffian, 11/14/2012 2:38:36 PM (No. 9014308)
What #1 said.
We lost the war on drugs. It´s a lot of money that can be moved on top of the table and taxed, and should be.
(And, no, I don´t use drugs and think people who do are idiots.)
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
rocco49, 11/14/2012 2:46:01 PM (No. 9014331)
A 21-year old student just died here in Butte County (Chico State) from alcohol poisoning after drinking 21 shots on his 21st birthday! Do you think 21 joints would have killed him? I dont. Alcohol is POISON!
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Rumblehog, 11/14/2012 2:53:37 PM (No. 9014355)
Kill the people who sell it.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Videodrone, 11/14/2012 2:56:16 PM (No. 9014363)
the proposal to legalize, regulate and tax overlooks one important factor, its a weed! anyone can grow it!
Sure, there will be some "Hi End" brands that will command top dollar but once the illegality is removed the "price support" is also gone, what is $2,000/lb will drop to a fraction and so will any tax revenue
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
chumley, 11/14/2012 3:11:04 PM (No. 9014386)
I dont like the stuff. I wont allow it in my house and I dont much care for the people who use it. Another thing I dont like is taxation. If people want to fry their brains and become worthless dead weight on their mother´s couch, thats between them and their mother. Like most human activities (good and bad) its none of the government´s business.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
LadyHen, 11/14/2012 3:18:56 PM (No. 9014401)
Yep #1... and stop spending billions on pointless irradiation programs and the incarceration of thousands.
When will the fools on left and right learn it is not the government´s job to save people from themselves!! That only leads to bigger government.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
thegare, 11/14/2012 3:33:23 PM (No. 9014428)
Make all drugs legal and free. The only condition is when the government agency passing out drugs they must make sure that every freebie is an over dose amount.
Pot has made my two sons totally lazy and if they hit even other more harm full drugs and OD, the world would not be losing anything.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
tivadoc, 11/14/2012 3:57:48 PM (No. 9014479)
There´s the rub # 10. Pot is a dream crusher. Nothing bad happens, but then again nothing good happens either. No dates, no advancing in school, nothing. You just hang out in your comfy chair and the world slips by.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Kowgirl, 11/14/2012 4:00:00 PM (No. 9014482)
How long will it be before users are considered victims of a "disease" and not simply potheads?
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
BaseballFan, 11/14/2012 4:04:37 PM (No. 9014496)
Yes, the sellers will be just RUSHING to happily pay the taxes on it. /s off/
Here´s a hint: the projected revenues from this won´t be a drop in the ocean compared to the real costs of legalizing it.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
forward, 11/14/2012 4:23:30 PM (No. 9014547)
Prison and a felony record is a far worse dream-crusher than pot. I say keep the war on drugs focused on the hard stuff like meth and heroin. I agree, and I think any cop would agree, that a room full of stoned people is much easier to deal with than a room full of drunk people. We would still have an added problem with DUI though, heavily stoned drivers on the road are just as unsafe as drunk ones. So it is a mixed bag, but still seems unjust to me that if a 19 year old gets drunk on whiskey, no legal recourse happens but if he gets stoned on pot, he could see his whole life ruined due to mandatory minimum sentencing in some states.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Liberal like Jefferson, 11/14/2012 4:26:23 PM (No. 9014557)
#7 you can also make your own legal wine and beer. It hasn´t hurt the beer/wine producers, has it? I home brewed for several years myself. When (not if) it´s legal again, most people will just stop by the 7-11 ln the way home to buy a blunt or two. It´s easier to slip over to the store and buy some weed than to cultivate it and cure it.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
xcenturion, 11/14/2012 5:17:32 PM (No. 9014662)
Legalize it everywhere and tax the hell out of it. However, every employer should still maintain policies that require random drug/alcohol testing for their employees. Fail once and you´re out the door.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
JHHolliday, 11/14/2012 5:30:26 PM (No. 9014692)
I am still torn about this question. One part of my brain says to legalize it, tax it and earmark the money for drug rehab facilities. Billions of dollars saved and no more gunfights over drug turf. It might even save some Mexican lives although the cartels would still bring in meth and the other hard stuff.
Then again I wouldn´t trust the politicians to keep their hands off the money and not start diverting it for vote-buying schemes.
And what if they keep raising the tax? Make the tax too high and people start growing their own and the homeboys in the hood go back in business and undercut the legal sales with lower prices.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Douglas DC, 11/14/2012 5:49:12 PM (No. 9014728)
I am not torn about this at all. Pot should be illegal as per the Fed law. It truly is like alcohol a gateway drug. It will not stop the Cartels. It will destroy lives.. Been Shot at by Potheads. The problem does not go away with legalization. It gets worse...
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
stymie82, 11/14/2012 10:58:43 PM (No. 9015162)
Are you a free man #18, or a ward of the state?
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "zoidberg"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "zoidberg"
|
|
Will the Right Come Around on Pot?
|
|
Reason, by A. Barton Hinkle
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 3/11/2013 10:52:26 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Advocates of treating marijuana more like alcohol gained another ally recently: the United Nations. The U.N. would claim otherwise. In fact, the U.N.’s International Narcotics Control Board would hotly deny it. The agency’s latest report laments the legalization of pot in Colorado and Washington, declaring the approval of recreational marijuana use “in contravention to” the 1961 U.N. Convention on Narcotics.(Snip)Here in the U.S., United Nations disapproval can only help the cause of legalization where it needs help the most: on the right.(Snip)The syllogism is easy enough to follow: The U.N. should not tell Washington what it can do
|
The Right to Self Defense Isn´t Negotiable
|
|
Reason, by Andrew Napolitano
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 3/7/2013 11:03:51 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In all the noise caused by the Obama administration´s direct assault on the right of every person to keep and bear arms, the essence of the issue has been drowned out. The president and his big-government colleagues want you to believe that only the government can keep you free and safe, so to them, the essence of this debate is about obedience to law. To those who have killed innocents among us, obedience to law is the last of their thoughts. And to those who believe that the Constitution means what it says
|
| |
|
Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul Join Forces to Legalize Hemp
|
|
Reason, by Matthew Hurtt
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 3/4/2013 2:27:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Supporters of industrial hemp gained a powerful ally in Washington several weeks ago when Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) joined fellow Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul and Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) as a co-sponsor of S.359, the Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2013. The House companion, sponsored by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), has 28 co-sponsors. The bills would amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp, the domestic production of which has been illegal since 1970. Though manufacturing hemp is currently just as illegal as growing smokable pot, 10 states already have frameworks
|
|
Broken Justice
|
|
National Review Online, by Conrad Black
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 2/28/2013 3:27:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
I observed Washington’s birthday by participating in a Federalist Society telephone forum on the American justice system with two other panelists.(Snip)These are, in the briefest synopsis, that American prosecutors win 99.5 percent of their cases, a much higher percentage than those in other civilized countries; that 97 percent of them are won without trial, because of the plea-bargain system in which inculpatory evidence is extorted from witnesses in exchange for immunity from prosecution, including for perjury; that the U.S. has six to twelve times as many incarcerated people per capita as do Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan
|
State of the Union: Rand Paul Brings Libertarianism to the GOP
|
|
Reason, by Brian Doherty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 2/14/2013 1:31:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The official Republican response to President Obama’s State of the Union address last night was from Florida Sen. Marco Rubio. But the Republican Party is a house (partially) divided now, with a self-conscious rebel wing, and the semi-official “Tea Party” response came from Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul. Paul won his Senate seat on a Tea Party anti-establishment wave in 2010, defeating establishment favorite Trey Grayson for the GOP nomination. (He wrote about it in his campaign memoir The Tea Party Goes to Washington.)
|
Mitch McConnell, That Old Hippie, Pushes Legal Hemp
|
|
Reason, by Jacob Sullum
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 2/13/2013 1:39:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) recently came out in favor of legalizing hemp cultivation, thanks to the persuasive talents of fellow Kentucky senator Rand Paul and the state´s agriculture commssioner, James Comer, both Republicans. The New York Times cites McConnell´s conversion as evidence that the cause, long identified with hippies and stoners, has gained respectability among conservatives. The fact that it has taken so long is testimony to the plant´s powerful symbolism, because there is no logical reason to stop farmers from growing industrial hemp, a version of cannabis with negligible THC, even if you support marijuana prohibition.
|
|
Everything Fun Is Illegal in Virginia
|
|
Reason, by A. Barton Hinkle
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 2/4/2013 12:27:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Only one or two centuries late, Virginia lawmakers have decided it is none of their business if unmarried couples share a roof. So the legislators are now working diligently to repeal the state’s law against “lewd and lascivious cohabitation.” Huzzahs all ’round for that. But do not unclutch thy bodice yet. Virginia law is riddled with antiquated provisions meant to govern the “morals and decency” of the fair people of the commonwealth. And while the law against shacking up apparently never gets enforced, others do.(Snip)Fornication remains forbidden under the Code of Virginia, Section 18.2-344.
|
|
The War on Pot: Not a Safe Bet
|
|
Reason, by Steve Chapman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 1/22/2013 2:22:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As recreational drugs go, marijuana is relatively benign. Unlike alcohol, it doesn´t stimulate violence or destroy livers. Unlike tobacco, it doesn´t cause lung cancer and heart disease. The worst you can say is that it produces intense, unreasoning panic. Not in users, but in critics. Those critics have less influence all the time. Some 18 states permit medical use of marijuana, and in November, Colorado and Washington voted to allow recreational use. Nationally, support for legalization is steadily rising. A decade ago, one of every three Americans favored the idea. Today, nearly half do—and among those under 50, a large
|
Hemp legalization effort gathers steam
|
|
Washington Post, by Juliet Eilperin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 1/14/2013 8:42:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the cannabis plant family, hemp is the good seed. Marijuana, the evil weed. Michael Bowman, a gregarious Colorado farmer who grows corn and wheat, has been working his contacts in Congress in an attempt to persuade lawmakers that hemp has been framed, unfairly lumped with the stuff people smoke to get high.(Snip)Bowman’s message is simple: Be sensible. “Can we just stop being stupid? Can we just talk about how things need to change?”
|
|
Who’s Attacking the Constitution Now?
|
|
Reason, by A. Barton Hinkle
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 12/31/2012 10:33:01 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Many ardent supporters of the Second Amendment are not quite so ardent about the First. And vice versa. A few days ago CNN host Piers Morgan got into it with the head of a gun-rights group. Now more than 87,000 people have signed an online petition demanding that Morgan, who is British, be deported for his “hostile attack against the U.S. Constitution.” But the First Amendment does not exempt British nationals, which means those signing the petition are also committing a hostile attack against the Constitution. The irony is probably lost on them.
|
Gay Participation Hurts Neither Military Nor Marriage
|
|
Reason, by A. Barton Hinkle
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 12/17/2012 2:32:25 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Did you catch the big story out of Afghanistan the other day—the one about how a U.S. platoon was decimated in a nighttime raid? The soldiers couldn’t fight effectively because their unit cohesion had disintegrated after one of them mentioned he is gay. How about the recent study showing it is now impossible to train new jarheads at Parris Island? Marine recruits are so afraid a gay bunkmate might be eyeballing them in the shower that they can’t follow even basic commands.(Snip)You didn’t hear about those developments? Don’t be alarmed. Nobody did—because they never happened. Yet they certainly should have
|
|
Government Spying Out of Control
|
|
Reason, by Andrew Napolitano
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: zoidberg- 12/13/2012 8:47:10 AM
Post Reply
|
|
After President Richard Nixon was forced from office in 1974, congressional investigators discovered what they believed was the full extent of his use of the FBI and the CIA to engage in domestic spying. In that pre-digital era, the spying consisted of listening to telephone calls, opening mail, and using undercover agents to infiltrate political organizations and, as we know, break into their offices. (Snip) But many Americans did complain to Congress, which in 1978 enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, commonly called FISA. FISA provided that all domestic surveillance be subject to the search warrant requirement of the
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
The most shocking news you won´t see in the MSM today
|
|
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 4/9/2013 11:49:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The murder trial of abortionist Kermit Gosnell largely is being ignored by the mainstream media, even in the face of grisly testimony, such as what we heard yesterday. Life News reports: ...a former employee described how she heard a baby scream during a live-birth abortion. Abortion clinic employee Sherry West described an incident which "really freaked (her) out" and related to the jury how she heard a child who was born alive following an abortion scream.
|
Obamacare architect Rockefeller: It´s ´beyond comprehension´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/10/2013 7:17:19 AM
Post Reply
|
|
West Virginia Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller, one of the towering architects of Obamacare, on Tuesday openly criticized program managers for not moving quickly enough to build the system, warning that if it gets off to a bumpy start it will just get worse. Decrying the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as way too complex, he warned the acting Medicare director that Obamacare is "so complicated and if it isn´t done right the first time, it will just simply get worse."
|
Obama enjoys ´sequester soul concert´ at White House amid massive budget cuts and government worker furloughs
|
|
Business Insider, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/10/2013 4:24:28 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The sequester may have many across the country singing the blues, but for President Obama, it was all about Memphis Soul. Even with the threat of furloughs and government cuts sparked by the sequester, Obama took the time to enjoy a star-studded concert at the White House tonight. The White House celebration of Memphis Soul music in the East Room--which included special guest appearances by Queen Latifah and Justin Timberlake--is likely to rile Obama´s Republican foes. Some conservatives have called on Obama to give up golf, especially since popular public tours of the White House have been canceled because of
|
Obama: Put Nation´s 4-Year-Olds in ‘Public Preschool;´ Will Save on ‘Child-Care Costs´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/10/2013 1:18:38 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In the message he issued along with his budget proposal on Wednesday morning, President Barack Obama said he wants to see 4-year-old children in the United States enrolled in public schools. Obama said America needs to start enrolling 4-year-olds to make sure the children are “better prepared for the demands of the global economy” and to help parents save on "child-care costs." After saying the United States needs to “equip our citizens with the skills and training” to fill jobs in manufacturing, energy and infrastructure, Obama said, “And that has to start at the earliest possible age.”
|
Obama´s Army Outmaneuvered by the NRA
|
|
NationalJournal, by Beth Rinehard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 4/10/2013 7:18:37 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Although the first votes on gun -control legislation have yet to be cast, by some measures the National Rifle Association has already won. Obama’s ambitious plans to ban assault weapons and limit magazine capacities are off the table, while the NRA suggested it could support the most likely outcome -- expanded background checks -- as recently as 1999. The NRA claims that the president’s efforts have triggered a fundraising surge and boosted its membership from 4 million to nearly 5 million.
|
4 annoying ways climate change will make your life a bummer
|
|
The Week, by Chris Gayomali
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/10/2013 7:30:26 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Within the next few decades, carbon emissions could cause global temperatures to rise between 4 and 11 degrees Fahrenheit, melting ice caps and causing sea levels to rise. The price of crops like coffee and chocolate will skyrocket, and countless cuddly animals around the globe could be wiped out. And yet, a lot of people find it hard to really care about climate change. But don´t be fooled: Climate change will affect you. Here´s a brief sampling of ways that warmer temperatures will suck the fun out of your life: 1. Your flights will be more turbulent
|
Sebelius: Implementing Obamacare More ´Difficult´ Than Anticipated
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/10/2013 7:21:14 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius conceded Monday that implementing the Affordable Care Act has been more complicated and frustrating than the Obama administration expected, largely due to Republicans who have opposed the law´s state-based exchanges and Medicaid expansion. "The politics has been relentless and that continues," Sebelius said. "There was some hope that once the Supreme Court ruled in July, and then once an election occurred there would be a sense that, ´This is the law of the land, let´s get on board, let´s make this work.´"
|
Student to Rand Paul: I don´t want government to leave me alone
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Maryland_Patriot- 4/10/2013 12:45:12 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During the Q and A session after Sen. Rand Paul’s speech at Howard University, one student explained that he was not a fan of his view of government. “You say you want to provide a government that leaves us alone, quite frankly, I don’t want that,” the student said. “I want a government that is going to help me.” The student insisted that he wanted assistance for his college education and asked if Rand Paul supported a culture change within the nation. “Do you Sen. Rand Paul have a formulated solution to come up with new American values
|
AG sues florist who refused flowers to gay wedding
|
|
Seattle Post-Intelligencer [WA], by Joel Connelly
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/10/2013 2:28:46 PM
Post Reply
|
|
State Attorney General Bob Ferguson on Tuesday filed a consumer protection lawsuit against Arlene’s Flowers & Gifts, a Richland florist that refused to supply flowers to the same-sex marriage of a longtime customer. Ferguson said he sent a March 28 letter to owner Barronelle Stutzman asking her to reconsider and supply flowers to customer Robert Ingersoll. Through an attorney, Stutzman declined to change her position.“As Attorney General, it is my job to enforce the laws of the state of Washington,” said Ferguson. “Under the Consumer Protection Act, it is unlawful to discriminate
|
Outraged Liberals Say Obama Is About To Screw Over The Very People Who Got Him Elected
|
|
Business Insider, by Grace Wyler
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/10/2013 6:35:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Liberals descended on Pennsylvania Avenue Tuesday to protest President Barack Obama´s decision to include entitlement cuts in his upcoming budget, delivering 2 million petitions demanding the White House back off its support for the chained CPI. As we reported this weekend, liberals have been seething over the inclusion of the chained CPI in Obama´s budget, which they see as a huge betrayal by the Democratic president. This week, progressive groups, including MoveOn, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, and Democracy for America, have mounted "emergency" online campaigns against the proposal, accusing Obama of
|
Ron Johnson’s JCPenney: Anatomy of a Retail Failure
|
|
Yahoo! Finance, by Jeff Macke
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: athina- 4/9/2013 9:45:34 AM
Post Reply
|
In a stunning end to one of the most aggressively unsuccessful tenures in retail history, JCPenney (JCP) last night announced that CEO Ron Johnson would be leaving effective immediately. Myron Ullman, Johnson´s predecessor at JCPenney, takes office as CEO. When Johnson was initially wooed by JCPenney, it was to serve as CEO with Ullman as Chairman. In January 2012, Ullman was unceremoniously removed from the board. Gone with Ullman was any control the Board of Directors had over Ron Johnson and his control of JCPenney resources. Headline corrected by Staff
|
CA Proposes Law to Force Insurance to Cover Homosexual ´Infertility´
|
|
Breibart´s Big Government, by Breitbart News
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: athina- 4/9/2013 10:00:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The state of California is reportedly considering legislation that would force group insurance policies to provide infertility treatment for gay and lesbian couples. Two men who have sex with each other for a year and do not produce a baby would be considered “infertile” under the proposed legislation. So would two women having sex. Since biology does not allow those without a uterus to conceive or those without a penis to impregnate, every year-long gay couple in California would potentially be covered by this new provision of California law.
|
| | |
|