 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Krauthammer: White House ´Held Affair Over Petraeus´s Head´ For Favorable Testimony On Benghazi
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 11/13/2012 10:36:40 PM
|
| Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer on Tuesday said the White House used David Petraeus’s affair to get the CIA director to give testimony about the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that was in line with the administration’s position on the matter. Appearing on Fox News´s Special Report, Krauthammer said, "The sword was lowered on Election Day" (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: I think the really shocking news today was that General Petraeus thought and hoped he could keep his job. He thought that it might
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Urgent Fury, 11/13/2012 10:39:02 PM (No. 9012644)
When did these idiots have time to do their jobs?
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
greg1a, 11/13/2012 10:42:13 PM (No. 9012647)
Chuck has it right!! It will ALL eventually come out and we can hope it leads to impeachment.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
CEP, 11/13/2012 10:46:55 PM (No. 9012656)
I thnk that Krauthammer is on to something.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
wepeople, 11/13/2012 10:47:05 PM (No. 9012657)
Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
JoElla Bee, 11/13/2012 11:08:17 PM (No. 9012693)
FTA: "I think the really shocking news today was that General Petraeus thought and hoped he could keep his job. He thought that it might and it would be kept secret, and that he could stay in his position."
That would make him worse than the people he lied to protect.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
sgtfox of the jarhead clan, 11/13/2012 11:09:14 PM (No. 9012696)
If a peasant tried something like that it would be called blackmailing a witness and lead to jail time. At some point high up on the government ladder crimes stop being crimes.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Moonspinner, 11/13/2012 11:13:13 PM (No. 9012701)
Would not surprise me if this woman and others like her are plants by the Obama Administration to "neuter" certain generals, admirals, etc. I believe Obama needs to get the military under control so they do not pull a coup when Obama goes for total control. Nothing would surprise me anymore. I never thought the US would have such a president. I never thought my rights as a US citizen would be in jeopardy. So why not a president who believes he can take complete control and he must get the military under his control before he can make his move? Just a thought. Sex is always the weapon of choice to bring a man with power down or to get control of him.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Kurto, 11/13/2012 11:28:23 PM (No. 9012732)
Krauthammer is a genius, and he is probably correct on this. I am looking one step beyond this to the DiFi and House hearings. If Petraeus was pressured to lie or face exposure he could be ready to turn on those who turned on him. He was in the situation room and monitored the attack in real time. He also went to Benghazi, himself, to investigate. He has already been exposed, His original testimony was not under oath, so not much to lose in telling the truth.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
RussVet, 11/13/2012 11:35:10 PM (No. 9012743)
Krauthammer: "White House Held Affair Over Petraeus´s Head For Favorable Testimony On Benghazi"
Guess that Chicago style blackmail backfired on Obozo didn´t it.. Petraeus step up and told the story himself instead of being force to be a liar for voting fraud usurper Obozo .... Petraeus/West for President when Obozo is arrested for fraud, which he has already done with his forged Barf certificate ...
Benghazi=Obozo TREASON
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
noddy, 11/13/2012 11:37:13 PM (No. 9012746)
I don´t believe that telling the truth under oath is any different from simply telling the truth. You´re either honest or you´re not.
And I too think that Krauthammer has pounced right in the middle on this one. Keep it up Doctor, we need you voice out there to be heard.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
LadyVet, 11/14/2012 12:15:04 AM (No. 9012785)
#9, I´d say that he succeeded. It delayed until after the election, which was the whole point.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
JimS, 11/14/2012 1:22:13 AM (No. 9012837)
And now that Petraeus has neutralized the blackmail by going public, does anyone believe he will testify at all?
Certainly not, with the possibility of trumped-up charges (conduct unbecoming...) against him and the threat of losing his military pension.
Well played, Valerie Jarrett.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
OhMy, 11/14/2012 1:46:36 AM (No. 9012854)
A lesson for all. Don´t lie to protect the one. The one has no honour and only a man of honour can really go up against him. Petraeus is much better than Obama and should never have allowed himself to be in that den of thieves. Wrestle with pigs in the mud and you will get dirty.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
OhMy, 11/14/2012 3:16:45 AM (No. 9012879)
Another thought on this: David Petraeus should take a lesson from his name sake King David. He had a time of weakness ( Bathsheba ) and bad judgement but he followed up with true sorrow for this episode with the beautiful penitential psalms… David was truly sorry and God forgives such a person. David Petraeus now sees where it is getting him lying for the one and trying to cover his own lack of honour and judgement. Now is the time to show true sorrow and do things right. Testify about what really happened in Benghazi. Obama will pull your pension etc. That is inevitable - you see what happens when you lie to save yourself by saving Obama - he throws you under the bus anyway. Just do the right thing starting now. Things will work out for the better as they did for King David.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
M2, 11/14/2012 6:51:19 AM (No. 9013032)
#7, I agree. President Jarrett, this Administration and its Agencies are far too sinister to ever have been contemplated here in America only 4 years ago.
The Marxists have waited patiently and have planned for this very moment for decades, when they knew the populace was ignorant, uneducated, too caught up in their entitlements and their hedonism to care and that the military was weakened by political correctness.
I hope I´m not around to watch the rest of this horror show.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
heneverlies, 11/14/2012 6:52:19 AM (No. 9013035)
Princeton Petraeus has certainly gotten himself in quite a pickle, so smart in the head, so dumb in his pants!
Anyone see a pattern with Obama and his clan? How neat of them to play this game of political hardball. Even Alan Colmes stands strong with Obama-Mao as this ship of evil slowly but certainly begins to drift and attract the icebergs just waiting beyond the horizon.
However, we American citizens will and are going to pay a very dear price for "our foolishness" in electing these people, starting with the "realities" of the health care bill of 2700 pages plus, which Nancy Pelosi made her soon to be famous remark.
How many will fall by the wayside like our soldiers in the Bataan death march?
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
ebgodard, 11/14/2012 7:04:46 AM (No. 9013055)
Obama, Biden, Mueller, Clapper, Holder, Clinton, Panetta, Axelrod and Jarrett all knew and all need to go.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
O.S. Banker, 11/14/2012 7:16:01 AM (No. 9013067)
I wish I shared the optimism of others that this would lead to Impeachment. But impeachment requires Congressmen and Senators who will uphold the Constitution despite the risk to their personal popularity. This Congress is not capable of leading a parade down MainStreet, USA in Disney world. To expect them to actually do their duty is the height of Hope over Experience.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
pineledger, 11/14/2012 7:21:24 AM (No. 9013078)
And when Petraeus went to Benghazi at the end of October to see for himself, he essentially cooked his own goose, because the Admn. could see that he might not stay in his box.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
cake crumb, 11/14/2012 7:23:32 AM (No. 9013086)
FTA:"If Krauthammer is correct, it´s going to be very interesting to see if and how the Obama-loving media reports it."
Simple: they won´t.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Judith, 11/14/2012 7:29:45 AM (No. 9013096)
Remember that old tale about the scorpion and, how in the end, due to its nature, it stung the victim? And old story but how true today. Obama´s nature is to destroy everyone and anything else to protect himself. And I believe that is the nature of ALL liberals. Destroy this country as long as they get the free stuff.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Really?, 11/14/2012 7:31:24 AM (No. 9013102)
I am very worried for Petraeus. He´s now expendable and his silence would be valuable to the regime. Keep an eye on him. If something happens it will be easy to "blame" the right wing as "angry over his betrayal".
The guy is in big trouble.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 11/14/2012 7:46:51 AM (No. 9013147)
DP is lucky to be vertical right now, I agree...
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Catherine, 11/14/2012 7:48:45 AM (No. 9013152)
Big surprise. Should have known Obama would find a fall guy. As for impeaching him, never happen. Too many scared of this guy - and with good reason. I don´t think we have brave patriots in Washington anymore.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
sorosisbehindit, 11/14/2012 7:51:32 AM (No. 9013164)
The admission of guilt was neither planned by the administration nor Petraeus. The administration was happily going along with a blackmailed general in their pocket to say and do what they told him to say and do. Petraeus was glad to participate, in an effort to protect his legacy and his marriage. Their hand was forced when a "right wing" whistle blower in the FBI went around his boss and let Rep. Cantor find out about this mess. Had it not been for Cantor, Petraeus would have dug in his heels and blackmailed them right back, refusing to go. Near the end the discussion and decision was about whether they could manage to time "the big reveal" to be post election and yet beat the republicans to the microphone with the news. I am sure they were holding their breath as the final days of the election approached, waiting for the shoe to drop. Which may explain some of the defeated/panicked look we saw in Obama´s eyes near the end.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
MOBeef4u, 11/14/2012 7:51:44 AM (No. 9013167)
While this evil cabal could have trumped up something to neutralize Petraeus, he made it easier by leaping into the honey trap. Are there no men or women in power with integrity or morals? And yes, I blame the women as much as the men. I know there are, but some days... (sigh)
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 11/14/2012 7:56:11 AM (No. 9013179)
They are ALL in on it. They ALL knew before the election. They ALL know that if the truth comes out over Benghazi and the cover-up Obama will be impeached, if only by the House. Obama deserves to be stained with the disgrace of impeachment. He is a lousy president. He has lied to the American people just like Nixon and Clinton. He does not deserve better treatment just because of his skin color.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
tappin52, 11/14/2012 7:57:02 AM (No. 9013181)
As to the argument that a man in his position opens himself to the danger of blackmail, who would have believed that the blackmail would have come from his own boss?
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Mermaid1, 11/14/2012 7:58:05 AM (No. 9013183)
The good news is that now that there is sex involved in the Benghazi massacre the media will actually pay attention.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Really?, 11/14/2012 7:58:22 AM (No. 9013185)
The first "rule´ for Congressional Republicans is to NOT put the cart before the horse, that is, do NOT talk about "impeaching" anyone before there is an investigation.
This situation ABSOLUTELY is worthy of an investigation or "audit" by the Congress and whatever is revealed can be taken from there.
It would be completely improper to leave the public wondering if we can trust our Government to be honest with us. Right now, the inconsistencies of the statements made by our President MUST be clarified. We MUST know that we can trust our Commander in Chief.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Danceman, 11/14/2012 8:03:39 AM (No. 9013194)
What happened to their West Point Cadet Honor Code, Patraeus Class of ´74, Broadwell Class of ´95, that "A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal or tolerate those that do?" Wasn´t that oath supposed to hold for life?
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Hugh Akston, 11/14/2012 8:06:02 AM (No. 9013201)
#30 - If we are going to put TRUST and Commander-in-Chief in the same sentence, it will have to be someone other than this FRAUD currently in office or anyone else associated with the current crop of criminals in and abetting this administration.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
suziannr, 11/14/2012 8:10:30 AM (No. 9013211)
We cannot trust the cic. He will not be "stained" by impeachment, were anyone to have the guts to impeach him, anymore than bill clinton is "stained" by his impeachment. I am a normally optimistic, peaceful through faith in my Lord, person who is looking at the landscape of this great country and wondering where do we go from here?
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
MattMusson, 11/14/2012 8:19:24 AM (No. 9013232)
SPECIAL PROSECUTOR!!
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
krause, 11/14/2012 8:30:40 AM (No. 9013257)
If Petraeus can secure his military retirement, he can be free to tell the whole story.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
LZK, 11/14/2012 8:33:16 AM (No. 9013270)
I think impeachment is a bit "much" to hope for -- but -- the "giggle" factor is starting. Each time DC opens it´s mouth the citizens "giggle".....
No one believes DC anymore..... Each citizen is shoring up his/her assets and moving to republican held states. The governors of these states will surely put up a line of defense...
The reality is -- the "gooooberment spongers" need someone to "sponge" from -- and WE the taxpayers are very clever. WE ´re moving our assets and packing up for friendlier states....
Good-bye Illinois....
LZK
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino, 11/14/2012 8:45:36 AM (No. 9013300)
#27 hits the bull´s-eye - - they´re all in on it - - including those valiant warriors, the Pubbies.
Sen. Dine Fine Stein is in full coverup mode - - despite her wide-eyed protestations of innocence - - and the Pubbies will be dragged along on the usual leash.
Anyone expecting consequences from these multiple acts of treason is delusional. All of the perpetrators are pro-abortion - - so all of them will skate away.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
Libertygal, 11/14/2012 9:03:37 AM (No. 9013353)
Breaking just now! He is going to voluntarily testify! This is going to be good.
I am more worried than ever for his life, now...
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
walcb, 11/14/2012 9:14:07 AM (No. 9013387)
So if this is true, Petraeus´s honor was compromised due to a sexual fling, not by foreign agents but by our own administration. What a sorry state of affairs we have come to.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
10chuckarnold65, 11/14/2012 9:16:05 AM (No. 9013392)
ok, is there anybody walking around upright, and breathing, who didnt already know this.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 11/14/2012 9:18:55 AM (No. 9013399)
Don´t get too excited, DP may fall on his sword to save 0´s disgusting azz.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 11/14/2012 9:18:56 AM (No. 9013401)
Women seeking importance and self regard by having affairs with powerful men- a la Lewinsky. They usually end up destroying the object.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
AutumnJoy, 11/14/2012 9:20:32 AM (No. 9013408)
In the future, depending upon what comes out, I don´t care whether impeachment is successful or not. I just want to have that option go before congress. I want this guy´s official history to be blemished. Of course an impeachment threat and then resignation would be a dream come true, but I am not that optimistic.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
nonsense, 11/14/2012 9:21:39 AM (No. 9013416)
I think this is absolutely stunning from the man who said very clearly that he does not believe in Conspiracy Theories. Proves that the inside the Beltway types know more about the truth of the corruption than they have been telling us.
Chrissy Mathews has commented that he was shocked at the interplay at the W.H. It seems as if he was referring to the cat fights that go on between ValJar and other females and males in the Obama administration.
The rats truly are sailing the ship of state.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
carolina blue, 11/14/2012 9:26:16 AM (No. 9013431)
First i dont want to say i condone what the god general did concerning the girl. but who amoung us have not lust after the opposite sex. who has not maybe fallen. but I believe the man will do what is right and honorable for the troops and I hope he blows the might O and his gang out of the water with his upcoming testomony before the special committee and I hope he has some good Body Guards as i dont put nothing past this Chicago GANG OF THUGS.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
gobushcheneygo, 11/14/2012 9:32:36 AM (No. 9013457)
The timing of all this "affair" business is just too perfect. What a distraction for the state-run media. No time to investigate the stolen Presidential election, the rampant voter fraud. No sir. That´s all history now. No time to investigate what really happened in Benghazi and who knew what and when. No siree. More important things to uncover. Have to find out all the salacious tidbits for the sex obsessed masses. Priorities, folks!
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
Eheu Fugaces, 11/14/2012 9:44:03 AM (No. 9013478)
These are Democrats (or collaborators.) Why is anyone surprised by any of this?
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
jrldev, 11/14/2012 9:54:42 AM (No. 9013501)
Sad but True: The Sad Part: Every comment made here is 99.9% accurate. The True and Real-LIfe Part: The entire congress: Representatives and Senators are worthless when it comes to do what is right for the country. They do what is right for THEM as individuals. That goes for Republicans as well as Democrats.The old saying "TALK IS CHEAP" should be inscribed at the entrance of both houses.
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 11/14/2012 10:00:23 AM (No. 9013521)
Gen. DP has always been an ´academic´ style General. This does not bode well for his ´unvarnished´ testimony.
He may decide to deliver a huge, steaming pile of nuance.
Val-Rod is unlikely to fumble the ball at this critical juncture.
DP, like Ryan & Romney, is crippled by the fact of having a conscience.
Libs play this game unfettered by such silliness.
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
trapper, 11/14/2012 10:12:23 AM (No. 9013563)
My gut tells me not to expect much. While my first thought upon hearing of this scandal was also "blackmail," upon reflection I doubt he needed much coaxing to be persuaded to go along with the Obama fairy tale about demonstrations over a youtube video. He has described himself as a "Rockefeller Republican," so he views conservatives as the enemy and Obama and his crew as just fellow liberals, not as radical leftists. My money says he won´t give them up. My money also says he won´t be asked any useful questions anyway.
They just cut Petraeus´s throat and threw him out of the life raft to attract the sharks while Obama and crew paddle for safer waters. The election was only a WEEK ago and it has been erased from the news in favor of a sex scandal. We are SO easy.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
Pepper Tree, 11/14/2012 10:22:11 AM (No. 9013598)
There is every reason and a good chance for an Obama impeachment. But with a Senate majority of dullards and blowhards led by sociopaths, how does he get removed from office?
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
roger h. cook,MD, 11/14/2012 10:29:10 AM (No. 9013632)
Gee No.2 I wish that could be true, but I don´t beleve it will happen. I can only dream.
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 11/14/2012 10:29:33 AM (No. 9013633)
Bwa-hahahaha
I can´t believe how easily "Conservatives" are suckered
It matters not at all if Petraeus "testifies"
Haven´t you figured out what matters are the Questions members of the Congressional committee ask???
The real and everlasting problem will be sitting in front of Petraeus.
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
OhMy, 11/14/2012 10:30:44 AM (No. 9013635)
Petraeus needs to kiss his military retirement good bye #35 - He has already experienced what hoping for loyalty from Obama brings you. His retirement is gone baby gone. If he wants to rebuild his honour and integrity he must start now with telling the truth. Better late than never with a winning strategy!
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
starboard, 11/14/2012 10:31:50 AM (No. 9013639)
I totally agree with Krauthmmer´s assessment. Now that Obama is no longer the CIC of General Petraeu, he needs to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. This is the only redeaming factor to this mess. My only fear is a Vince Foster or Ron Brown type of situation. Do the right thing general and tell the truth. the American people will stand behind you.
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
OperaBuff, 11/14/2012 10:41:24 AM (No. 9013673)
Quite a twist of fate, to know that General Petraeus was blackmailed for his adulterous affair by none other than the President of the United States.
I love the smell of impeaches in the morning...
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
Browneyes, 11/14/2012 10:46:35 AM (No. 9013695)
To my mind,there is one component to this Bengazi story and that is the absence of the name SOS Clinton. She held the "cards" re: all jurisdictions over which she presided. I recall she and her hubby were on a "mini" vacation earlier this year, after which came her decision to resign after the election.
The General, as CIA chief was truly between a rock and a hard place when he echoed HER pronouncement that it was the "mob" meme. His dalliance, not withstanding and his statement that "no one in his department told any one to step down"
We´ll see.
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
Aunt Agnes, 11/14/2012 10:49:50 AM (No. 9013708)
Two thoughts - dictators are always brought down BECAUSE of their innate ruthlessness. The people whom they trust to protect their secrets can´t themesleves trust the guy at the top to protect them. Anyone in BO´s cabal knows that he cold-bloodedly turned his back on Amb. Stevens - why would anyone really trust him with their careers or LIVES after that? Also, is the real story here making the generals look foolish & weak so that BO can easily install more moslem-sympathizing generals in their places? Look at how the mid-east is now dominated by the moslem brotherhood. Think the NASA moslem "outreach" program. And one more thing -there has been a lot of excited talk about seccession by more and more states. IF this is for real - it is at the very least, a way to keeps up the pressure on our Feds. They know, now, that they are not so well-loved or trusted & the states might just do something about it. If nothing else, the movement is a bargaining chip - a threat of action - to get states rights back.
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
Trust No One, 11/14/2012 10:59:56 AM (No. 9013734)
What would make one think he´ll begin to tell the truth next week?
Under Oath??? Humfffffffff
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
M Stuart, 11/14/2012 11:00:19 AM (No. 9013736)
How about testifying to AMERICA, not a closed session of Congress?
I´m tired of recycled, regurgitated almost-truth.
|
Reply 62 - Posted by:
EQKimball, 11/14/2012 11:03:04 AM (No. 9013745)
For now he should avoid walks in Ft. Marcy Park.
|
Reply 63 - Posted by:
Papa27, 11/14/2012 11:04:29 AM (No. 9013748)
Advice to the General - don´t accept the invitation to meet at Ft. Marcy Park.
|
Reply 64 - Posted by:
thatsomewhereplace, 11/14/2012 11:45:11 AM (No. 9013854)
I´m becoming more cynical. Had a feeling the admin was screwing around with the general. As for the general. As head of the CIA he should have known the consequences. Like black mail, like giving away secrets to protect his arse. And what to you suppose will become of Barack "Hugo Chavez" 0bama? Not a damn thing will happen. Swept under the persian carpet. Deny deny deny until no one gives a flying you-know-what. Always remember Chris Stevens. Tyrone Jones. Sean Smith. Glenn Dorherty.
|
Reply 65 - Posted by:
little guy, 11/14/2012 11:53:21 AM (No. 9013884)
Seriously, think about this. Could it be the good general is pulling a Samson on Obammy? You destroyed me by playing on my weakness for women --- I lost my strength & I was blinded by it all --- but now I will pull the temple down with you in it!
David P. WAS being blackmailed by none other than people he worked with but he knew it was Obammy himself who was behind it. So what does a real soldier do when he let´s down his own troops? He doesn´t just fall on his own sword if he can kill himself by killing the traitor too. Maybe ... just maybe ... the good general wanted Obammy to win as the only way to really get him.
By resigning the day of the election, and now agreeing to voluntarily testify, the General is sending the message that I am dead ... but so are you! You´re coming with me over the cliff because that is the only way to make things right.
If the General pulls Obama down, he will be a hero again and may realize that it is the only way back into the light from out of his personal darkness. Beware, General, your life many be in danger but I think you know that and now no longer care. Obama destroyed everything you love & hold dear so what do you have to loose now? HOWEVER --- Obama´s entire presidency may be hanging now. This is much more serious than most realize about what is really going on behind the scenes.
|
Reply 66 - Posted by:
Slimepuppy, 11/14/2012 11:56:14 AM (No. 9013889)
...as an avid runner, Petraeus is ALWAYS a potential ´sudden heart attack´ risk....
....much less suspicious than a puffy-pink Breitbarting....
|
Reply 67 - Posted by:
Nevadadad46, 11/14/2012 12:43:40 PM (No. 9014026)
When will the sitting Democrats in the Senate get a belly full? Are they that owned by Øbama? Can they possibly remain men and women of America and go on accepting their status as only kissers of the Charlatan in chief´s posterior? The world wonders.
|
Reply 68 - Posted by:
miceal, 11/14/2012 1:17:38 PM (No. 9014135)
Where I on that Committee, my FIRST question would be "do you remember your West Point oath?" If so, repeat it here and now....
|
Reply 69 - Posted by:
donnaclaire, 11/14/2012 8:45:06 PM (No. 9015015)
Back in the olden days when I worked for a PD in Texas, the gals who liked to hang around the cops were called ´fender lizards´. I guess the women who follow the rock stars are called ´groupies´ and probably worse. Wonder what we should call those who hang around and cultivate the attention of generals? They may be well-educated, well-married and high profile but, in my humble opinion, they still fall into a somewhat dubious category.
|
Reply 70 - Posted by:
get er done, 11/14/2012 10:05:01 PM (No. 9015107)
Thankfully, despite his affair, David Petraeus has many more friends in the military than Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro. Petraeus friends will have his back now that they know BHO/BS was behind the blackmail. The old say, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." Do names like Reggie, Donald come to mind?
David Petraeus is a trained killer. One would think twice about trying to take Petraeus out in the way Brietbart left us. This would lead to a military coup -- those generals have access to big guns and troops. They should seize the billions of rounds of ammo purchased by Homeland Security, Social Security and other agencies.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
|
One Word on the Boston Massacre
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/15/2013 10:18:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It is too early to say much about today’s terrorist attack on the Boston Marathon, but one thing struck me when I watched this video, which Steve posted earlier today, as well as other videos and photos of the aftermath of the explosions: The response to the bombs by the crowd at the finish line was, I think, exemplary. Sure, many people fled from the explosions, and reasonably so. But a remarkable number ran, as they say, to the sound of the guns, even though when two bombs go off, one might well expect more. Many of these were professionals. The finish line of a marathon is a fortuitous spot to bomb,
|
|
U.S. Folding on North Korea?
|
|
Commentary Magazine, by Max Boot
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/15/2013 10:14:30 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It was too good to last. For the last few weeks, the Obama administration has been showing more fortitude in confronting a belligerent North Korea than either the Bush or Clinton administrations had done. But last week, as I previously noted, there was a worrisome leak in the New York Times which quoted administration officials as saying that any response to a North Korean attack would be strictly proportional—which can only encourage Kim Jong-un to act, safe in the knowledge that the U.S. and South Korea will not “over-react” and bring down his criminal regime in response.
|
Republicans embrace Obama’s offer to trim Social Security benefits
|
|
Washington Post, by Lori Montgomery
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/15/2013 9:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s offer to trim Social Security benefits has perplexed and angered Democrats, but GOP leaders are embracing the proposal and rushing to jump-start a debate that will delve even more deeply into the touchy topic of federal spending on the elderly. This week, two House subcommittees plan to hold hearings on “reforms to protect and preserve” programs for retirees, starting with Obama’s proposal to apply a less generous measure of inflation to annual increases in Social Security benefits. Also on the table are higher Medicare premiums and reduced benefits for better-off seniors,
|
Reid warns of ‘unreasonable extremists’ in gun debate
|
|
Washington Times, by David Sherfinski
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/15/2013 9:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, kicked off Monday’s session by saying the victims of December’s Connecticut shooting rampage deserve a vote on gun legislation and warning of “unreasonable extremists” who may try to derail or delay the process. Mr. Reid said protecting citizens’ Second Amendment rights and working to prevent gun violence are “both worthy goals, and they should not be mutually exclusive goals.” The Senate on Monday begins debate on a gun-control bill, the expected centerpiece of which is a amendment that would expand gun-purchase background
|
Obama following Philadelphia abortionist´s trial
|
|
Washington Times, by Dave Boyer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/15/2013 9:49:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama is following the murder trial of a Philadelphia abortionist, but the White House wouldn’t say Monday whether he’s drawn any conclusions from the gruesome testimony. “The president is aware of this,” White House press secretary Jay Carney said in response to a reporter’s question of whether Mr. Obama is paying attention to the trial of Kermit Gosnell. But asked if Mr. Obama had reached any public policy lessons from the trial, Mr. Carney said, “The president does not and cannot take a position on an ongoing trial.” Dr. Gosnell is on trial on murder
|
Tragedy in Boston: One Photographer’s Eyewitness Account
|
|
Time Magazine, by John Tlumacki
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/15/2013 9:46:46 PM
Post Reply
|
|
LightBox spoke with Boston Globe photographer John Tlumacki, who photographed the explosions at the finish line of the Boston Marathon. Tlumacki, who has photographed more than 20 marathons in his 30 years at the Globe, describes the sheer chaos of the scene: I was covering the finish line at the ground level at the marathon. Everything was going on as usual. It was jovial — people were happy, clapping — and getting to a point where it gets a little boring as a photographer. And then we heard this explosion. It was sort of like, ok, what’s that all about?
|
Boehner Plans Lengthy Review of Senate Gun Bill
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Elizabeth Sheld
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/15/2013 7:26:10 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Congressional sources say that GOP lawmakers and strategists are urging Speaker Boehner to kill any gun control legislation that comes to the House by refusing to act on it. The Speaker is planning "what could be a months-long review of the bill that likely would involve chipping away at gun-related measures" and instead encourage options that focus on the mental health aspect of gun violence. "I fully expect that the House will act on (gun) legislation in the coming months," Boehner said. "But ... I want the (House) Judiciary Committee to take the time to look
|
GOP super donor Bob Perry of Texas dies at 80
|
|
Associated Press, by Paul J. Weber and Will Wissert
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/15/2013 7:21:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
AUSTIN, Texas — Republican mega-donor Bob Perry never cared for the spotlight. But writing big checks and financing one of the most famous television ads ever in a presidential campaign made the Texas millionaire famous nonetheless. A wealthy Houston homebuilder who shunned publicity while generously bankrolling GOP candidates — and becoming a force in a new era of lavish spending in American politics — Perry died over the weekend, said former Texas state Rep. Neal Jones, a close family friend. Jones said late Sunday that Perry died "peacefully in his sleep" Saturday night. He did not offer further details.
|
Perry, backer of GOP causes and Houston builder, dies at 80
|
|
Houston Chronicle, by Jayme Fraser
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/15/2013 7:17:39 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Houston homebuilder, philanthropist and major political contributor Bob Jack Perry died Saturday night at his Nassau Bay home. He was 80. "He´s one of the finest human beings I have ever known in life. A true patriot and inspiration," said spokesman Anthony Holm, who worked with Perry for a decade. Perry was best known for his top contributions to primarily conservative candidates and political action committees within the past decade. U.S. District Judge David Hittner, a friend of Perry´s, said he felt
|
Gun-rights leader: ‘We snookered the other side’ on Toomey-Manchin
|
|
Washington Times, by David Sherfinski
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/14/2013 10:22:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A prominent gun-rights advocate claims his group’s staff was in the room during the drafting of the recently unveiled proposal to expand gun-purchase background checks and said that “we snookered the other side — they haven’t figured it out yet.” Alan Gottlieb, executive vice president of the Second Amendment Foundation, made the remarks at a speech in Portland, Ore., on Friday, according to video captured by the group Daylight Disinfectant. The remarks came shortly before the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA)
|
Gun rights group endorses Manchin- Toomey background-check bill
|
|
Washington Post, by Tom Hamburger and Ed O´Keefe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/14/2013 10:22:17 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In anticipation of Senate votes this week on a proposed expansion of criminal background checks for firearms sales, one gun rights organization broke with the powerful National Rifle Association on Sunday to urge support for a compromise drafted by Sens. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) and Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pa.). The endorsement by the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms — which calls itself the second-largest gun rights organization in the country, behind the NRA, claiming 650,000 members and supporters — is one of several moves over the past few
|
The Palestinian Authority blows off John Kerry
|
|
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/14/2013 12:01:34 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has accepted the resignation of his Prime Minister Salam Fayyad despite pleas from the U.S. and the EU that he retain Fayyad. Actually, I am wrong to say “despite.” According to Fatah officials, U.S. pressure on Abbas to keep Fayyad in power proved counterproductive. Let us not probe the merits of Abbas’ decision to accept Fayyad’s resignation or explore the demerits of Fayyad’s tenure as prime minister. PA politics is a cesspool of corruption and ineptitude — always has been and probably always will be. Let us instead
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House snub to Thatcher: Obama won´t send envoy - and leaves it to her old allies from the Reagan era
|
|
Daily Mail (U.K.), by James Chapman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/15/2013 9:50:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Friends and allies of Baroness Thatcher expressed ‘surprise and disappointment’ last night as it emerged President Obama is not planning to send any serving member of his administration to her funeral. Whitehall sources have revealed that the U.S. delegation at tomorrow’s service in St Paul’s Cathedral will be led by two Reagan era secretaries of state: James Baker and George Shultz. Though President Obama himself had not been expected to attend, there had been speculation that he would be represented either by Vice President Joe Biden or wife Michelle. The Queen’s decision to attend
|
Are We Being Compromised by Barack Obama´s Murky Past?
|
|
American Thinker, by James A. Lyons
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/15/2013 6:18:58 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Since he first became a presidential candidate, President Obama must have spent millions of dollars in legal expenses to combat dozens of so-called "birther" challenges seeking the original documents pertaining to his birth. As president, he famously issued an electronic document on the White House website in 2011; the document purported to be his long-form birth certificate, though it is apparently a forgery. In addition, he has taken great pains to hide the paper trail of passport records, college transcripts, and other data -- all of which a prospective employer might require of a job applicant.
|
Gitmo Is Killing Me
|
|
New York Times, by Samir Naji al Hasan Moqbel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/15/2013 8:29:32 AM
Post Reply
|
|
ONE man here weighs just 77 pounds. Another, 98. Last thing I knew, I weighed 132, but that was a month ago. I’ve been on a hunger strike since Feb. 10 and have lost well over 30 pounds. I will not eat until they restore my dignity. I’ve been detained at Guantánamo for 11 years and three months. I have never been charged with any crime. I have never received a trial.
|
NBC Reporter Luke Russert Speculates On Boston Explosions’ Link To 1993 Waco Siege
|
|
Mediaite, by Andrew Kirell
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/15/2013 5:18:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In light of the explosions that have rocked Boston on Patriots’ Day, during the city’s annual marathon, NBC reporter Luke Russert took to Twitter to speculate that today’s horrific events could possibly be related to the 1993 government siege on the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas — an incident often attached to conversations about “right-wing terrorism” and anti-government violence. “I was at Fenway Park w my dad and @mikebarnicle during Waco which was on Patriots Day in 1993. Speculating on possible link,” Russert tweeted following the explosions.
|
Obama: ‘People shouldn’t jump to conclusions’ about Boston Marathon bombing
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Joel Gehrke
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2013 9:45:50 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama pledged that the United States would punish anyone responsible for the explosions at the Boston Marathon today, but he said that “people shouldn’t jump to conclusions” about the tragedy. “We still do not know who did this or why and people shouldn’t jump to conclusions before they have all the facts,” Obama told reporters during a statement from the White House. “Any responsible individuals, any responsible groups, will feel the full weight of justice,” he added. Two explosions occurred today near the finish line of the Boston Marathon,
|
Breaking: Obama to make statement from White House
|
|
CNN, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 4/15/2013 5:58:09 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Barack Obama will deliver a statement Monday at 6:10 p.m. ET from the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House. As seen in the photo, President Barack Obama spoke Monday on the phone with FBI Director Robert Mueller to receive an update on the Boston explosions. Seated with the President are Lisa Monaco, assistant to the president for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, and Chief of Staff Denis McDonough. A White House official said earlier the president has been notified of the explosions. "His administration is in contact with state and local authorities.
|
Rubio Offers Full-Throated Support for Immigration Bill
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 4/14/2013 5:33:09 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The impending introduction of legislation to overhaul the country’s badly strained immigration system received an extraordinary endorsement on Sunday from Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida, who, after holding back for weeks, appeared on no fewer than seven television talk shows to explain and defend a plan that he said would be “a net positive for the country, now and in the future.” It was a striking show of confidence from Mr. Rubio, one of eight members of a bipartisan Senate group that has been crafting a plan to provide a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants;
|
Is media bias to blame for lack of Gosnell coverage? Or something far more banal?
|
|
Washington Post, by Paul Farhi
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 4/14/2013 10:03:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Is media bias to blame for lack of Gosnell coverage? Or something far more banal? The trial of Philadelphia doctor Kermit Gosnell would seem to have all the elements of a spectacular news story: shocking allegations, horrifying visuals, sympathetic victims. Yet until late last week, much of the national media was silent as testimony about Gosnell’s alleged “house of horrors” abortion clinic rolled out. Much of the media attention outside Philadelphia, in fact, centered on how little media attention the story was receiving outside Philadelphia.
|
Meredith Baxter, Patty Duke to Play Lesbian Couple on Upcoming ´Glee´
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Hollywood, by Breitbart News
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2013 11:12:19 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Two veteran TV actresses may join the cast of Fox´s Glee after their upcoming appearance as a kindly lesbian couple. Meredith Baxter, known for being the All-American Mom on Family Ties, and Patty Duke who soared to fame in her self-titled series, will offer guidance to a gay character considering popping the question to his partner. According to a Friday report at E!, Oscar winner Patty Duke and longtime television star Meredith Baxter will play a lesbian couple. Not only that, regular character Blaine played by Darren Criss will propose to
|
Feds seek suspects, motive in Boston bombings
|
|
Associated Press, by Jimmy Golen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/16/2013 6:53:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
BOSTON -- The bombs that blew up seconds apart at the finish line of one of the world´s most storied races left the streets spattered with blood and glass, three dead, including an 8-year-old boy, more than 140 wounded and gaping questions of who chose to attack at the Boston Marathon and why. Federal investigators said no one had claimed responsibility for the bombings one of the city´s most famous civic holidays, Patriots Day. But the blasts among the throngs of spectators raised fears of a terrorist attack. President Barack Obama was careful not to use the
|
Obama’s plan hatched at Columbia University
|
|
Human Events, by Wayne Root
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: EnsignO- 4/14/2013 12:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama and I were college classmate at Columbia University, class of ’83. I know all too well how mindlessly liberal the students and faculty of that institution can be, and Barack Obama is certainly no exception. My time at Columbia made it crystal clear: liberals always believe they are morally superior. [Snip] It is in this cesspool of intolerance that Obama and his Marxist cronies hatched a secret plan to destroy our country. There are two things you need to know about Obama at Columbia University. First, he was Pre Law and a Political Science major- just like me.
|
CBS: Saudi Man In Custody Was Tackled By Bystanders At Boston Marathon
|
|
Business Insider, by Jim Edwards
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 4/15/2013 8:16:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Saudi Arabian man who is reportedly in police custody following the Boston Marathon bombing was chased and tackled by bystanders shortly after the blast, according to CBS. Senior correspondent John Miller, a former assistant director of the FBI, reported this: There is an individual in custody … he is not free to go. There is an individual in custody … he is not free to go. He is a Saudi national who was near the scene of the blast. When the blast happened he began to run. Now, in context, a lot of people began to run.
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|