A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Where Do Republicans Go
From Here? The Social Issues

Power Line, by John Hinderaker

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 11/11/2012 6:09:38 PM

Do Democrats engage in soul-searching after they lose an election? Maybe I miss it because I’m not a Democrat, but it doesn’t seem that they do. After John Kerry lost in 2004, did Democrats agonize over whether they should stop opposing the war in Iraq, or become pro-abortion? When Democrats were “shellacked,” as President Obama put it, in 2010, did they debate whether they should come up with a coherent plan to deal with the debt and start adopting budgets? Not that I recall. We Republicans are different. Whenever we lose an election, you can be sure two things

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Spidey, 11/11/2012 6:20:02 PM     (No. 9007835)

Republican need to stay who they are for the most part.Keep your mouth shut about rape.We didn´t lose this election on issues but personality cult and massive government giveaways and the MSM being 100% in the tank for Obama.You also have an education system that´s rewriting history to make our founders look like villains.

People like Soros knew exactly what to do to destroy this country,all he needed was a willing stooge like Obama.A white Obama would never have gotten re-elected.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Susannah, 11/11/2012 6:28:54 PM     (No. 9007848)

This article is brilliant. I hope more people read it.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: dadofboys, 11/11/2012 6:39:51 PM     (No. 9007862)

I despise my country and what it has become. Where can I go to escape. Please, where can I go and be a white, male physician, veteran, never arrested, never cheated on taxes, never on the dole, paid for everything I ever had and raising some very decent law abiding kids. Is there a country that wants me?? Willing to travel!


Reply 4 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 11/11/2012 6:46:01 PM     (No. 9007868)

Reply 3, you must not despise your country. Despise its leaders. I understand and share your misery. It is a bitter pill to swallow that the Republic is lost. America, 1620 to 2012, RSP.


Reply 5 - Posted by: sunsong, 11/11/2012 6:46:12 PM     (No. 9007869)

This is excellent. Take heed all you know-it-alls and purists :-) A big tent wins more elections than a holier-than-thou tent.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Muguy, 11/11/2012 6:48:56 PM     (No. 9007871)

How about trying some [r]epublicanism as advocated by the founders....


Reply 7 - Posted by: dolphin, 11/11/2012 6:50:34 PM     (No. 9007874)

Everybody should be able to love whichever consenting adult he or she wishes to love.

Marriage is a religious rite. It violates the separation of church and state for the state to marry people. The state can recognize a civil union. (What next, atheist baptism?)

Abortion is murder. Period.

If we don´t stop sending our children to state run schools we will all die in concentration camps.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 11/11/2012 6:51:51 PM     (No. 9007875)

I don´t despise my country but I do hate what it has become.

I don´t know much, I´m just a guy but I say fight the dems and let them have what they want now, when the the crash comes, I mean the catastrophic crash comes, we will be the savior of the country with clarity and fiscal sanity.

Right now the population wants Santa Claus, let them have it in spades but be against it all the way.

When people find themselves selling apples on the street corner it will clarify their minds like nothing else... let it come, sooner rather than later, get it over with.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Mike PHX, 11/11/2012 7:00:43 PM     (No. 9007887)

There should be a list of faux Conservatives, even Republicans. Whenever the MSM tries to trot them out as "conservatives", or even "Republicans", we can nip them in the bud.
Lets begin with the Stupid Media´s favorites:
David Brooks
David Frum
Peggy Noonan
Steve "Dumbass fat bald MF" Schmidt

This is just a starting list...


Reply 10 - Posted by: Yephora, 11/11/2012 7:19:53 PM     (No. 9007923)

My core values come from the Bible -- period.
Hollowed-out politicians on both sides of the aisle with their eye fixed on society´s moral weathervane will inevitably wind up pandering to the sewer.
Christians must resolutely stand with the unchanging word of God.


Reply 11 - Posted by: sgtfox of the jarhead clan, 11/11/2012 7:26:20 PM     (No. 9007931)

Will we ask ourselves that same question when the brown shirts come to take us away...where do we go from here ? I look at my neighbors with deep suspicion now. More than half of them are plotting an end to my America .


Reply 12 - Posted by: GreatPlains, 11/11/2012 7:32:37 PM     (No. 9007937)

The author makes valid points .
Somewhere along the way ,
the attitude towards a big tent party was deemed
to be heresy.
Republicans will be looking at a pup tent if they don´t take
Hinderaker´s sage advice.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Lt.Mom, 11/11/2012 7:42:55 PM     (No. 9007953)

Amen, #10, Amen!


Reply 14 - Posted by: rabbit, 11/11/2012 7:49:24 PM     (No. 9007959)

I agree with the author´s approach on abortion and gay marriage. But I think the welfare issue needs more fundamental thinking.

Running against ´welfare´ is a non-starter, for it depends on what one means by ´welfare´. Seniors don´t think of their Social Security payments as ´welfare´, but once they have received back what they and their employers put in, plus interest...it is welfare, plain and simple. And Republicans don´t intend to run against Social Security.

I think we would all agree to government payments to people who are unable to work due to severe disabilities. Millions of families have a disabled loved one. When Republicans talk about the fat, lazy nonworkers on welfare, it drives away these families who have responsibility for a severely disabled adult who would love to work...if he could.


Reply 15 - Posted by: lakerman1, 11/11/2012 7:59:19 PM     (No. 9007966)

I respectfully disagree with you, #14. I collect social security, after I and my various employers paid into the fund for 60 years!
And I also paid both sides of ss for my self employment for 31 years.
If I had been able to invest the money put into my account over 60 years, I would be much better off than I am now, with the mandated monthly benefit. So I don´t consider my monthly check to be welfare, but a relatively low rate of return on my investment.


Reply 16 - Posted by: bluehouse, 11/11/2012 8:00:56 PM     (No. 9007970)

The worry of gay marriage isn´t just gay marriage per se. Many are concerned of the slippery slope. If gay marriage is allowed why not polygamy? Gay marriage will of course be advocated in the schools and if it conflicts with your religion you and your children will be bigots.


Reply 17 - Posted by: mominNoCA, 11/11/2012 8:00:57 PM     (No. 9007971)

Good points, #14, but many of us who have adult children with disabilities on SSI know the GOP isn´t referring to our kids when they speak of the Gimme Crowd. It´s not always articulated well by our party´s candidates, that´s true.

I was touched when Mitt Romney mentioned his sister, who has an adult son with Down syndrome, at one of his last campaign stops. He should have made his position on government assistance for this group clearer much earlier in his campaign.

However, I think Republicans should also study and learn strategies to combat election fraud. That was also a factor in Obama´s win, and it has nothing to do with the parties´ positions on various issues.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Coy860, 11/11/2012 8:10:35 PM     (No. 9007987)

For starters, how about going back to the Constitution?
Explain to the People what the government is and is NOT in place to do.


Reply 19 - Posted by: octrojan, 11/11/2012 8:18:25 PM     (No. 9007993)

No, #15, you haven´t "paid" into SS. FICA taxes are general budgetary revenues and are used for current expenditures--war, welfare, foreign aid, interest on the debt--it goes into the general pot. There is no trust fund or "lock box." You haven´t paid a penny into SS.

You´re also taking out far more in benefits that was supposedly "paid" in on your behalf. You´re collecting welfare, period. Not saying we junk SS, but let´s at least be honest. But no one is going to take SS away, so it´s a bit of a red herring. Your comment, however, shows how hard it is to talk honestly about "welfare," corporate or otherwise.


Reply 20 - Posted by: FormerDem, 11/11/2012 8:24:05 PM     (No. 9007998)

Try this advice and I will abandon you for a third party. Here is a warning: I´m a sledgehammer.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Katie Corrupt, 11/11/2012 8:34:01 PM     (No. 9008014)

When families were strong, before skyrocketing divorce rates and out-of-wedlock births, people never needed government to be the answer to all their problems. Families cared for their own. The government is a poor substitute and as government attempts to be Mommy and Daddy to 50 million or so people, they are destroying the future of the other 250 million people.


Reply 22 - Posted by: ramona, 11/11/2012 10:11:18 PM     (No. 9008114)

I do not see how we can separate out social issues from fiscal issues. Why? Because the bar keeps getting pushed, by the left, further and further towards the absurd.

For example, my liberty is threatened when I am told that I must play along with some poor deluded soul who was born with male parts and DNA but who now wants to be a female - even if he wants to share the restroom with me. In the workplace or school, notices are posted that promise state sanctions against anyone who shares a differing opinion.

I understand Hinderaker´s view here, but life is not so simple any longer.
Ramona (the Pest)


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: TXknitter, 11/12/2012 12:30:30 AM     (No. 9008219)

Amen #10 - and we are going to do just that.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Japanorama, 11/12/2012 1:17:50 AM     (No. 9008240)

Certainly not to another Bush, Dole, McCain, or Romney.


Reply 25 - Posted by: StormCnter, 11/12/2012 7:03:12 AM     (No. 9008370)

Yup, we lost a crucial election. Nope, we are not doomed, done for, killed off or moving to Canada. Not if we retain our love for country and everything it has stood for all these years. I was as depressed as anyone else, but I refuse to allow Barack Obama´s victory to reprogram my confidence that my party can learn from our missteps (perceived or real). And, I will not be defeated by the media and David Axelrod. Those of you who are lying down in surrender should be ashamed.

Thank you, John Hinderaker. I agree with almost everything you said.


Reply 26 - Posted by: dadofboys, 11/12/2012 8:21:43 AM     (No. 9008475)

I guess I will be fine with a government that is fully socialised, as long as we all pull the cart and I dont get treated like a pack mule because Im white. Hence, I will not be living in the US, because when the US goes full socialist, it will be Venezuela, not Sweden. When I do move, it will be to an all white, no mexican hispanic country, wherever that may be.


Reply 27 - Posted by: MDConservative, 11/12/2012 10:42:29 AM     (No. 9008822)

Great advice to politicians, ignoring the fact that many hold deep concerns about social issues, including marriage, abortion and "welfare". So, the best strategy is to expect those with "nowhere else to go" to show up along with a number of lightly-principled-centrists to vote for conservatism, if not exactly buy into it. Genius...?



Post Reply   Close thread 711613




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Maryland girl is armed with
arguments against gun control
Washington Times, by David Sherfinski    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:26:36 PM     Post Reply
A three-minute video of Sarah Merkle’s testimony about Maryland’s new gun legislation has drawn more than 2 million views on YouTube, won her praise from gun rights advocates across the country and even scored her an interview on national television last week. But the 15-year-old from Baltimore said she cares more about her message. “The biggest part of this is that the pro-gun, Second Amendment argument is getting publicity,” she said. “I like that it actually got out there, and not just because it’s me, but because it’s the argument.”

Filibuster gains support to
delay gun control vote
Washington Times, by David Sherfinski    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:25:18 PM     Post Reply
A growing number of senators are trying to quash gun legislation before it even hits the chamber floor as Democrats hold out hope for a compromise and the White House gears up for a weeklong offensive to pressure Congress to act. Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, said as many as 13 senators now publicly support a filibuster on the motion to proceed on pending gun legislation, which effectively would block debate on the bill. “When you’re in a snake pit, you kill a snake any time and chance that you get,”

White House looks to salvage
gun-control legislation
Washington Times, by Tim Devaney    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:22:42 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration took to the airwaves Sunday morning to call on Republicans to back the president’s plan for gun control. In interviews on “Fox News Sunday” and ABC’s “This Week,”Dan Pfeiffer, a senior White House adviser, pointed out that 90 percent of Americans support President Obama’s plan to expand background checks on citizens who purchase guns, and he pressured Republicans to get on board with what he said where “common-sense measures.” “You can’t get 90 percent of Americans to agree on the weather,” Mr. Pfeiffer said on “Fox News Sunday.” Mr. Pfeiffer warned that a potential Republican filibuster

Bipartisan unity on North Korea:
Republicans praise Obama’s
handling of threat
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:20:32 PM     Post Reply
President Obama won rare foreign policy praise from Republicans for his administration’s handling of the North Korea crisis, as China signaled a possible readiness to play a more active role in pressuring Pyongyang away from provoking a military conflict. Two influential Republicans commended the White House on separate news talk shows Sunday for striking an effective balance by allowing senior Cabinet members to issue cautionary remarks in response to North Korea, while also strategically adjusting the U.S. military posture in the region. “This administration’s acted responsibly,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham

Senate has become more
partisan, less collegial —
more like the House
Washington Post, by Chris Cillizza    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:17:33 PM     Post Reply
The world’s greatest deliberative body has started to look a lot like its legislative little brother over the past few years. The Senate was once regarded as the home of the great political orators of the time — not to mention the body where true dealmaking actually took place. Its members prided themselves on their cool approach to legislating, in contrast with the more brawling nature of the House. Senators, generally, liked one another — no matter their party — and weren’t afraid to show it, either personally or politically. No longer. The Senate has undergone a marked transformation

Gun legislation’s prospects improve
Washington Post, by Ed O´Keefe and Philip Rucker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:14:37 PM     Post Reply
Prospects for a bipartisan deal to expand federal background checks for gun purchases are improving with the emergence of fresh Republican support, according to top Senate aides. The possibility that after weeks of stalled negotiations senators might be on the cusp of a breakthrough comes as President Obama and his top surrogates will begin on Monday their most aggressive push yet to rally Americans around his gun-control agenda. Even though polls show that a universal background-check system is supported by nine in 10 Americans, the president has been unable to translate popular support

An act of political malpractice
Washington Post, by Ruth Marcus    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/7/2013 11:12:28 PM     Post Reply
On the matter of the president and Kamala Harris, I could go either way. I could write a column — call it Classic Feminist High Dudgeon — lamenting the president’s comments about the California attorney general’s good looks. This column would discuss the continuing, albeit more subtle, discrimination against women in the workplace. It would explain how, even if unintentionally, Obama’s reference to Harris’s attractiveness is demeaning — that it serves, in the apologetic words of White House press secretary Jay Carney, “to diminish the attorney general’s professional accomplishments and her capabilities.” It would, inevitably, invoke the president’s daughters

Democrats push problem
solvers in House contests
Washington Post, by Paul Kane    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:38:26 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Party officials believe that Kevin Strouse is exactly the kind of candidate who can help them retake the House next year. He’s a smart, young former Army Ranger — good qualities for any aspiring politician. But what party leaders really like is that Strouse doesn’t have particularly strong views on the country’s hottest issues. Immigration? Tax policy? “Certainly I have a lot of research to do,” Strouse acknowledged in an interview Thursday as he announced his candidacy in a suburban Philadelphia House district. Strouse’s candidacy reflects an emerging

Texas prosecutors’ slayings
unnerve rural Kaufman County
Washington Post, by Stephanie McCrummen    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:33:08 PM     Post Reply
KAUFMAN, Tex. — The judge was on the phone. “Yep, I said I’ll do anything,” Bruce Wood told the person on the other end, rubbing his forehead. “They asked me to do a eulogy. I don’t know what I’m going to say.” Elsewhere in the Kaufman County Courthouse, a sheriff’s deputy was handing out bulletproof vests. “I brought the smallest one,” he said to a secretary, who stared at the khaki armor as he explained how to adjust the side straps should the need arise. “These have the neck for a female.” Outside, two armed guards

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

A Reporter Explains Why
Gun Coverage Is So Biased
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:13:14 PM     Post Reply
Well, not intentionally. But Jim Ragsdale of the Minneapolis Star Tribune attended a conference in Chicago on covering gun issues, which he describes this way: “Covering Guns” brought reporters with front-line experience covering mass shootings in Tucson, Ariz.; Aurora, Colo.; Newtown, Conn., and Red Lake, Minn., to meet with gun experts and advocates and gun trainers. Sponsored by the Poynter journalism center and funded by the McCormick Foundation of Chicago, we gathered in a city that witnessed 506 homicides last year. The idea, I take it

Report: Carbon Emissions
in US Lowest Since 1994
PJ Media, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:03:02 PM     Post Reply
Carbon emissions in the US were at their lowest level in 2012 since 1994, according to figures released by the US Energy Information Administration. We did it without carbon trading scams, the EPA making carbon dioxide a poison, or obeying the dictates of the Kyoto climate Treaty. We did it partly because of decreased economic activity as a result of the Obama recovery-that-isn’t, but mostly because of good old fashioned market forces; competition between natural gas and coal: Energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2012 were the lowest in the United States since 1994



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
70 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

65 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

63 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Broadcasters worry
about ´Zero TV´ homes

43 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM     Post Reply
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from

Christians, here´s why we´re
losing our religion

43 replie(s)
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM     Post Reply
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

42 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

41 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

The Secrets of Princeton
39 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for


Post Reply   Close thread 711613





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS