 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham debate how Romney lost the election
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:sparky86, 11/7/2012 12:49:08 PM
|
| The shock of last night’s electoral outcome in the presidential race is setting in for some conservatives. But just how it was lost seems to be up for the debate. On Laura Ingraham’s Wednesday radio show, conservative commentator Ann Coulter and Ingraham debated who is to blame. Coulter, author of “Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama,” was less willing to fault the candidate Mitt Romney, while Ingraham put the loss mostly on the shoulders of those running the Romney campaign. COULTER: I think Romney ran just on his own force of will, a magnificent campaign.
|
Comments: This is an instructive discussion on what went wrong --- whether it was a tactical or strategic shortcoming, or was it ideological in that the country has given up on conservative government.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
bobgray2, 11/7/2012 12:54:12 PM (No. 8996729)
Romney didn't lose the election, the American people did. They just don't know it yet.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
ivehadit, 11/7/2012 12:57:53 PM (No. 8996739)
THANK YOU MITT ROMNEY FOR TRYING TO SAVE OUR COUNTRY. Thank you Ann and all your family for trying so hard. We TRULY appreciate all your efforts. You are a wonderful family and if half of this country can't see that, then so be it. It is THEIR LOSS. G-d's blessings eternally to you all.
What the nattering nabobs of negativity don't understand is MONEY(read unions) BOUGHT THIS ELECTION, imho, pure and simple.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
crill, 11/7/2012 1:00:10 PM (No. 8996751)
In complete agreement with Coulter's analysis. Romney was as good a candidate as you can get, but this isn't America anymore and it isn't coming back.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Italiano, 11/7/2012 1:02:53 PM (No. 8996764)
Ann is right, as is #1. Mitt wasn't the problem. I'd be willing to bet that he exceeded a lot of our early expectations. We misread the American electorate. It's much further gone than we thought.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
dman, 11/7/2012 1:07:33 PM (No. 8996791)
Coulter and the rest of the GOP Establishment - and even Rush as I hear him - are blaming the electorate. No, no, no. It is the fault of the GOP campaign, not the electorate. They had the money, they had an army of Tea Partiers that they ignored, and they stuck to a prevent, economy-only, defense. The GOP lost because their in-house experts, not the public, are morons. They did nothing to counter the corrupt LSM. They did nothing to stop election fraud. They just played it safe. After all, they had this one "in the bag".
Morons.
Yes, there are the selfish among us, but they are not the majority. The problem is that too many decent citizens believed the Democrat/LSM/entertainment media lies. That happened because the GOP did not effectively employ the resources and issues it had at its disposal.
Time for Coulter, "Charlie Crist" Christie, Romney, Boehner, McConnell, Rove, Morris, and the rest of the apologists and conservative posers to go away. Time for Palin, West, Love, Cain, Gingrich, Hannity, and others including old-style Dems like Caddell and Shoen to start leading. We need a new political party.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
octrojan, 11/7/2012 1:10:02 PM (No. 8996799)
Yes, Mitt was the problem. As Dukakis learned, elections aren't about "competence," they're about ideology. Running as a fixer-type was a poor decision, particularly when the economy made noises that could be spun as a recovery.
He should have made it more about ideology, what kind of country we want to be, etc. Did you hear anything about ObamaCare in the last month or two? The EPA? Specific examples of regulations killing jobs instead of vague platitudes?
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
agility, 11/7/2012 1:10:31 PM (No. 8996801)
Romney did not run a good compaign. He didn't respond to the negatives early on and they feastured. He played not to lose instead of trying to win and he lost. Got to be someone who can articulate the concepts. Frustratingly, never had Ryan out doing that.
And the Repulican Party with all of their unspent money. just unbelievable.
Chris Christie is beyond comtempt. No excuse for his behavior.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Pepper Tree, 11/7/2012 1:14:47 PM (No. 8996815)
Mitt was perfect for 1965 America. He's clearly too good for today's America.
He's too good for women who think abortion and birth control are our most pressing issue. He's too good for gays insisting they need more rights than everyone else. He's too good for every 'gimmedat' voter, and person who voted skin color. He's too good for illegal occupants clogging up our emergency wards. And he is clearly too good for white guilt fools and Occupy dirtbags anarchists.
Too bad we have to share the same country with such people. And I'm ready to hear any ideas about splitting away from them.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Moritz55, 11/7/2012 1:18:10 PM (No. 8996826)
I understand the temptation to blame the loser for losing, but when you look at what Romney was up against, it's amazing how well he did. Romney went through a bruising primary, endured a multimillion dollar character assassination campaign, faced a press corps that not only opposed him but covered for his opponent, and on top of all that got the momentum blown out of his sails by "Sandy" -- yet in spite of all that, he still came very close to winning. I think he deserves a little more credit and a lot more appreciation for a hard fought campaign.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Italiano, 11/7/2012 1:18:10 PM (No. 8996825)
I really thought that America, even post-Scott Brown Massachusetts, would draw the line at Elizabeth Warren. Guess not. Oh well...
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Cleanhousein2012, 11/7/2012 1:18:40 PM (No. 8996829)
It's smile, they brought milquetoast to a street brawl. Gov. Romney may be a god and competent guy, but he clearly is only a brawny in his own house.
To bad he didn't use his elbows.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
log cabin preacher, 11/7/2012 1:19:14 PM (No. 8996832)
Of course Ann will say that. She told us Romney was the only person who could win. Either she was wrong or there's some "other factor".
Personally, and many of you know this, I never liked Romney. There were so many more actual conservatives who could have given Obama a run for his money, who would have energized the tea party and who would have called a spade a spade. I'm shocked that Romney used a scorched earth campaign to get the nominaion and then went soft against Obama.
Aren't there any Pubbies who have a set of stones who don't play dead in a general election?
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
ivehadit, 11/7/2012 1:21:06 PM (No. 8996843)
Yes, 8, exactly. Which is why all those you mentioned need to experience the consequences of their actions...
I remember the 70's and 80's. I had a 13% mortgage. THIRTEEN PER CENT. CD's were 18% BUT had NO purchasing power. Makes you not want to go back there again BUT WE ARE HEADED RIGHT THERE. A very vicious cycle.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
FWgrandma, 11/7/2012 1:24:27 PM (No. 8996858)
I say it's the voters fault. It is OUR RESPONSIBILTY to get and vote, NO ONE should have to inspire us to, beg us to, or bribe us to we should vote as our civic duty, the results lie on our collective heads. We the voters are to blame for being lazy and irreponsible in not voting. American citizens should hang their heads in shame at OUR voting records!!!!! no excuses and quit blaming everyone else. we the citizens are to blame!!!
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Fireball27, 11/7/2012 1:24:31 PM (No. 8996860)
The stupid Republican party lost this election. Did they point out how lowering taxes bring in more revenue? No! Did they show how on January 3rd, 2007 the Democrat party took over the government? No! Did they point out that the Democrats, with Chris Dodd, and Barney Frank, in the lead, ruined the housing market and thus the total economy? No!
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
M Stuart, 11/7/2012 1:27:14 PM (No. 8996877)
If Ann had great ideas to get her guy into the White House, she should have said so. I'm sure there was a dedicated line in to her office.
I don't know what to do with the way I feel today. I listened to two radio programs: Rush made me more upset. Beck has a plan.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
excalgalcg, 11/7/2012 1:27:45 PM (No. 8996882)
I couldn't listen to Laura Ingraham for long as she was so negative this morning. I turned the radio off and it will stay that way today. Another article I read today referred to why Romney lost and the author pointed directly to the biased media. How does anyone win an election fighting a corrupt party and a corrupt media? That's the major problem in this country, the media. Wait til 2016, the Rep. candidate will be torn to shreds before he/she ever gets to a primary.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
planetgeo, 11/7/2012 1:29:38 PM (No. 8996891)
My observation, aside from the previously expressed tipping point being reached, is that the Republicans have not yet learned what the Democrats now clearly understand...you have to nominate a charismatic leader. It's not enough to get the last geezer standing (Dole, McCain) or the least worst nice competent guy that doesn't offend too many (Romney). You need a charismatic leader that people connect with and believe will be "the strong horse". Women in particular instinctively gravitate to that type of candidate, and no amount of bad news or scandals seem to shake them away from such candidates.
Repeat after me...learn it...love it...practice it, RNC...CHARISMATIC LEADER.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
steveracer, 11/7/2012 1:32:48 PM (No. 8996904)
I am leaning in agreement wih #5. I don't know where I'll hitch my wagon, but I am done with this bunch.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
St. Pitbull, 11/7/2012 1:33:48 PM (No. 8996911)
Agree with #7 - and additionally: - I'm afraid this was the last chance that the R's had of winning a presidential election. Look at the demographics. We've got a bunch of liberal, single-parent kids coming of age that are used to sucking at the gov't teet. - Our country is NOT getting better. Just look at the generational changes. And we have denied immigration to productive people and opened the door for the 3rd world miscreants. This is not the same country we were raised in. - I am TIRED of the R's bending over backward to "fight fair" and not hurt feelings. We are in a street fight and they want to use some effeminate fighting style. - Watch the emergence of a "ruling royalty". They have already voted themselves "special" privileges. Here come lots more! - This is not our country any longer. I hate anyone who voted for the Øtard. - Until the Catholic Church gets unified on certain concepts (e.g., vote for a murderer, you are a murderer), I'm gone. I don't need wood and stones to define my faith. - I'm not paying my taxes to support the Øtard and his cronies. Read into that what you will. - In all seriousness, do people have some good ideas on alternative places to live? I'm partial to St. Thomas Island.
I have a couple of hundred more thoughts but will can them.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
idahospanky, 11/7/2012 1:34:10 PM (No. 8996912)
Why are wasting time debating why Romney lost the election? Why aren't we instead starting impeachment proceedings? GLenn Beck created the Blaze because he wouldn't be muzzled by Zero. The rest of the media and Congress are culpible for allowing this traitor to remain in office. The FBI has said that if Zero had to have a basic security clearance at any classification level in any secure federal facility, they couldn't give him one because he can't meet the minimum requirements. So how can he be POTUS? Think how easy it would be for a foreign power to insert a real Manchurian Candidate in the most powerful position in the world when the POTUS doesn't have to have a security clearance. The Russian and Chinese intellince agencies must be laughing themselves silly if it weren't for the fact that they're too busy making plans to overthrow the US.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
TrueBlueWfan, 11/7/2012 1:35:59 PM (No. 8996918)
#16 - it is funny how Beck's plans all end up being about HIM.
We have obviously reached the point of there being more takers than makers. This was Barry's plan all along and it happened alot faster than I thought it would. I think we have to fall over that fiscal cliff and turn in to Greece before any of them might consider voting for a Republican.
Romney was not my first choice, but I don't think anyone else could have done as well as he did. Part of the problem was that his solutions were not explained on a personal level - how a tax cut for a rich person might get an unemployed person a job, how higher energy prices affect the entire economy, etc..
I am scared for our future, be it Obamacare, the fiscal cliff, energy prices/fracking, the general dependency - all of it will change America irreparably.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Feebie, 11/7/2012 1:36:02 PM (No. 8996919)
rigged.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
starboard, 11/7/2012 1:37:43 PM (No. 8996928)
I totally agree with Ann. I heard Laura this morning on the way to work and it was like throwing salt on the wound especially early in the day. Ann is much more reasoned.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
hoopsfan, 11/7/2012 1:40:19 PM (No. 8996940)
I'll side with Ann in this discussion. Romney is a good man, ran a good campaign, and would have made a fine President. He is so superior to Obama in so many ways, it's ridiculous.
I'm really not sure how the Republicans can overcome demographic issues like minority voting patterns, ever greater numbers of recipients of welfare and entitlements, and single women who are stuck on abortion.
Beating an incumbent is not easy, and that single woman Sandy the hurricane didn't help either.
Don't over-react and trash the nominee.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
GreatPlains, 11/7/2012 1:40:32 PM (No. 8996941)
Ingraham is a bitter woman and she only recently toned down her constant harping against Romney. Coulter is right , Romney ran a terrific campaign , I can't see a Santorum or a Cain or Bachmann getting as far as Romney did. Romney also had to deal with the unrelenting beat down from the talkers on the right in addition to a long and bruising primary. Ingraham's anti Romney campaign , while offensive and unhelpful , didn't affect the outcome . The sobering reality is that the electorate has changed and not for the better . Robert Stacy McCain at the AmSpec described it this way- " The cretins and dimwits have become an effective governing majority, .." The virulent and corrupt MSM is stronger than ever. Conservative talk radio took a beating last night. Conservatism took a beating last night. The bigger story is not that Romney lost the election , in fact , Ronald Reagan could not have won with this new electorate. The bigger story is that the America we used to know , is gone.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Conservativegirl, 11/7/2012 1:41:45 PM (No. 8996946)
This was not Romney's fault or Obama's. Neither of them are a factor and are unimportant. This was a referandum on the american people, and they failed miserably. They will most certainly suffer the consequences of their folly and greed when the money runs out, as it most assuredly will no matter what anyone does. Wishing the cliff were not there will not make it go away. Reality will not be mocked.
Girl's Hubby
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
firsty, 11/7/2012 1:43:36 PM (No. 8996953)
The reason that Romney lost is a no brainer. The country has turned the corner to an entitlement country with over 50% of its citizens collecting entitlements and Obama is the share the wealth entitler-in-chief.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
yuban, 11/7/2012 1:56:56 PM (No. 8996989)
When you have more takers than workers you are doomed. RR would lose today. Even when the money runs out, the Govt will just print more. I fully expect American women will now stop shaving their arm pits.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
msjena, 11/7/2012 1:57:57 PM (No. 8996992)
I am done with Ann Coulter. It doesn't matter who wins--she just keeps on enriching herself. Her twitter page says she lives in LA/NYC. That says it all to me. She was and is dead wrong about Christie and, while I don't fault her for supporting Romney, who was the best of the poor alternatives, she failed to make the case for him. I guess she liked him because he had two Harvard degrees. She is just a flamethrower and really, an embarrassment to conservatives and certainly, to Christians (which she claims to be).
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
god of irony, 11/7/2012 2:27:16 PM (No. 8997078)
15% said Sandy was the most important thing when they voted. It was Coulter's boy Christie that handed that to Obama.
Also given the lower turnout that McCain I suspect the closet anti-Mormon "Christians" stayed at home as they have a tendancy to do when they don't get everything their way.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
skedaddle, 11/7/2012 2:33:26 PM (No. 8997097)
I agree with #12. We need Republicans who can fight against Democrats, not just their fellow Republicans. Everyone knows the media is almost entirely hard left so it's time to act that way. Be ready for the trick questions and blow those idiots out of the water - the electorate would stand up and cheer to see those pompous blowhards get taken down a peg. Chamberlain and the rest of the world learned the hard way what appeasement with a determined enemy gets you. Why oh why can't Republicans learn?
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Malia2012, 11/7/2012 2:37:21 PM (No. 8997111)
What #26 said. I agree with Ann Coulter..Stopped listening to Laura Ingraham months ago. She was a little late to the party in supporting Mitt Romney, who IMHO, would have been a GREAT President, and I can see by some comments today, a lot of other so-called "conservatives" were dragged kicking and screaming to vote for Mitt, if they actually did. I guess the loss of the Presidential election gives them some thoughts of "I told you so"...Whatever gets them through the night....During the next four years, obama himself, will prove HE told you so. Looks like the slings and arrows from the usual Mitt Romney haters is not going to go away. Disappointing, , but totally not unexpected.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
log cabin preacher, 11/7/2012 2:44:23 PM (No. 8997133)
#33 - In all due respect, maybe we did "tell you so". I held my nose to vote for Mitt (and my vote didn't matter because I'm in Texas). I was told by Coulter and so many others that Mitt was the only one who could do it, even though I felt putting him up was a rotten idea.
So, yes, maybe we did tell you so. We're still screwed, but at least give us this moment of vindication.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
ebuilder, 11/7/2012 2:45:03 PM (No. 8997135)
It appears that the White Horse Prophecy from 1843 was not fulfilled prophecy after all.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 11/7/2012 2:52:36 PM (No. 8997152)
The GOP establishment ALWAYS blames someone/something other than themselves. Yes, it's ALL the Tea Party. Boehner has the Tea Party to THANK for being called Mr. Speaker.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 11/7/2012 3:01:31 PM (No. 8997187)
@#21: Do you really think impeachment hearings will help? That would be the most sure fire way for the GOP to lose the House in 2014 - that is if they don`t lose it compromising with the dems beforehand. Obama is very popular and the MSM will cover his behind no matter what. We have become a one-party nation.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
Thos Weatherby, 11/7/2012 3:19:33 PM (No. 8997266)
Next time the liberal media and the Republican elite tell us which candidate we need to support, we stand up to them and say no. This election we heard of groups like single moms, blacks, Hispanics and women. But we didn't even sense the TEA Party. Palin was zeroed out at the convention. Cain was just used for the endorsement then dumped. Coulter and others jumped on the Romney bandwagon. If it was the women, blacks and hispanics that helped Obama win, why weren't they included on the GOP team.
The current GOP elite has got to go. We need to be verbal on getting rid of the Coulters and Roves. Quit supporting these people and let Fox know.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 11/7/2012 4:03:49 PM (No. 8997421)
#38, I asked someone last night "what happened to the Tea Party?" They were such an important part of the victory in 2010, and they seem to have evaporated.
I cannot get over the feeling that we are living with the results of a gimme culture and a stolen election. All that needs to be done is steal a few key state elections, because of the exaggerated importance of swing states under the Electoral College system.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
stjohnswood, 11/7/2012 4:11:18 PM (No. 8997449)
Money, and fraud #2. Carefully laid in place well before election day. That was the real Obama &Co. ground game. And unless serious election reform is untaken state by state it will only expand. And what are the chances of reform under this administration!? Is there a large segment of low-intelligence voters who were accurately represented by Obamaphone woman? Oh, hell yes! But I don't believe for one minute they comprised a majority by themselves or even enough when added to skewed thinkers comprising the rest of the Dem/Left.
This election is about as authentic as the last one won by Saddam Hussein in 2002. Remember CNN on the ground over there clucking away about how popular Hussein was? How great a victory it was? It was mindboggling to watch them utter that kind of crap with straight faces, and never once challenge it -- not even back in Atlanta.
Ingraham is seriously dishonest in her arguments.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 11/7/2012 8:21:19 PM (No. 8998176)
Mitt was too nice and didn't stand a chance against a liar and cheat.
The real problem is the voters, many a second generation of dumbed down lemmings drinking KoolAid.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
yorkiemom, 11/7/2012 9:01:31 PM (No. 8998243)
Agree with every word in #26. Laura Ingraham was taken out of our Las Vegas market a couple of years ago, so I don't have to listen to her negativity. Bought two of her books, stood in line to see her one time, but will not give her the time of day ever again. I keep wondering why she hasn't run for an office since she seems to have all the answers. Ann Coulter is right.
Not one Republican that I can think of could have won against Our Leader and the media. Too many greedy people wanting their freebies.
Mitt Romney is a class act, a decent, honest person. Too bad America doesn't seem to want that now.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
OhMy, 11/8/2012 6:12:34 AM (No. 8998698)
Sorry everyone I heard the interview and I think Ingraham had the best take. I like them both and Ingraham likes Coulter and had her on the show so this is not war. Romney was a good person who doesn't deserve any of the slurs he got any more than Bush did but you gotta fight this stuff. The electorate is different and they both said so. Too many people are brainwashed. Many times I was screeming at the TV during debates hoping Mitt would answer the class warfare demagoguery with the facts about the short time it would pay for the govt spending at the present rate if all the "rich" were cleaned out and left penniless. This could only be done once and there would be no private sector and nothing but Obama picking loosers. Capitalism is slimed but Romneys record of achievement at Bain capitol shines compared to Obamas record squandering stimulus money. He just said " I can get the economy going, I know how" but he could have and should have debunked the class warfare pandering which was the core of Obama's campaign at every turn. A few history lessons on Communism and the failure it always produces were needed. The electorate does not know these things. I liked the ad produced privatly by the hungarian immigrant reminding all the people that the handouts will innevitably end when the nation collapses. Obama left the idiots thinking this can go on forever and the dependent takers vote for that. For them government is life or death.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
Crashnburn, 12/3/2012 12:24:40 AM (No. 9045213)
Romney could have run a better campaign, the media is biased against the Right, the nation is full of takers, elementar, junior high, high schools and colleges and universities are the breeding grounds of liberals, and the Democrats cheated the Hell out of the election.
I think we all agree about the above. Now, what the He11 are we going to do about it?
Its always been, those that can, do, and those that can´t teach. Well, the teachers are teaching Johnny and Jane that its OK to bleed the doers dry. We need doers, maybe after retirement, to become teachers; to inspire Johnny and Jane to become doers instead of takers.
We need to infiltrate the media; it might take years to get to a secure enough position to criticize liberal policies, but it can be done.
In the meantime, we should be able to start a conservative newspaper that doesn´t cost a mint in subscription fees. The current newspapers are going broke because they aren´t popular with the consumers.
Cheating is investigated at the county level. We need people to run for office at the county level so we can: 1) stop the cheating, and 2) investigate cheating. It would also be good to win Secretary of State positions.
CA is now essentially a one party state, so any candidate would have to change parties to Democrat, then run as a moderate. Same for any other one party state.
Finally, pass and enforce voter ID laws. They tend to reduce cheating, more than 100 % of registered voter turnouts, and dead people voting.
In other words, we need to start at the grass roots and work our way up.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "sparky86"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "sparky86"
|
Welfare concerns persist as Gang of Eight prepares to roll out immigration bill
|
|
Daily Caller, by Caroline May
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 4/3/2013 5:08:29 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As the Gang of Eight negotiates and prepares to roll out a comprehensive immigration reform bill, members of the “gang” have not publicly addressed concerns that remain about policies surrounding law already on the books — specifically one relating to immigrant dependence on welfare. Section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act prohibits individuals likely to become primarily reliant on the government for survival: “An alien who, in the opinion of the consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of the Attorney General at the time of application for
|
Krauthammer: Gay marriage cases may presage ´assault on religion´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 3/30/2013 2:38:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On this weekend’s broadcast of “Inside Washington,” Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer said the two gay marriage cases currently before the Supreme Court could lead to an all-out assault on religion in the United States. “It gets really sticky,” Krauthammer said. “If the court were to decide that to deny same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, then you got Georgetown University – a Jesuit university [that offers] married student housing. It’s a Catholic University. So [when] it says it’s only going to allow heterosexuals, it will get sued. This will become an assault on religion.
|
Alabama state representative launches into race-fueled rant over Second Amendment rights
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 3/27/2013 3:07:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In Alabama, no state legislator, Republican or Democrat, would ever question gun rights, given the state’s conservative leanings and rural setting. But Democratic Alabama State Rep. Joseph Mitchell of Mobile, Ala. has a curious take on why his constituents in his majority African-American district should appreciate their Second Amendment rights. In emails sent from Mitchell’s official state legislature account obtained by the blog Yellow Hammer Politics and published Wednesday morning, Mitchell had a heated exchange with a constituent identified as Eddie Maxwell and provided his own defense of the Second Amendment.
|
Rand Paul goes on the offensive against Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 3/21/2013 4:53:27 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In an appearance on Fox News Channel’s “America Live” on Thursday, Kentucky Republican Sen. Paul told host Bill Hemmer that Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh are wrong to criticize him for working to provide legal status to illegal immigrants. Paul, fresh off his win in the Conservative Political Action Conference presidential straw poll, specifically disagreed with the suggestion he is being “suckered” into an agreement with Democrats. “I’ve got a news flash for those who want to call people names on amnesty: What we have now is de facto amnesty,” Paul replied. “We have 11 million people here
|
Ted Cruz hits back at Joe Scarborough for ‘willfully ignorant’ remarks
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 3/16/2013 1:53:16 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On his Friday program, MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough ranted against junior Texas Sen. Ted Cruz for questioning the constitutional merits of California Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s gun control proposals. “I don’t mean to go on and on here, but I am so shocked that he would continue to use his seat in the judiciary committee to just mislead millions of Americans and put forward a willfully ignorant position on what the Constitution says and what it does not say,” Scarborough said.
|
Mark Levin ´convinced´ GOP leadership ´has a Republican death wish´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 3/13/2013 8:22:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On his Tuesday radio show, conservative talk show host Mark Levin said House majority whip Kevin McCarthy, who this weekend claimed Congress could soon pass a comprehensive immigration bill, has a political death wish. “Ladies and gentlemen, I’m convinced the Republican leadership — particularly in the House — has a Republican death wish,” Levin said. “When you put these Mickey Mouse types in charge of the Republican Party in the House, what do you get, Mr. Producer? You get mice turds. And that’s what we have here: mice turds from the likes of [Rep.] Kevin McCarthy.” McCarthy had told CNN
|
George Will: ´I will do many things for my country and my profession. I won´t take seriously [Jay] Carney´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 3/1/2013 12:13:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Laura Ingraham’s radio show on Friday, Washington Post columnist George Will took a few digs at the Obama White House for the way it has handled the so-called sequestration crisis. According to Will, the process has shown the public just where President Barack Obama and other liberals are on government and how any reduction is “intolerable.” “I think the sequester argument is extremely useful because it’s very educational for the American public,” Will said. “When the Obama administration increases on average 17 percent the budgets of the domestic agencies that are now facing a 5 percent cut
|
Laura Ingraham: Joe Scarborough’s disdain for talk radio may stem from his own 2010 radio ´cancellation´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 2/21/2013 4:48:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On her Thursday program, conservative talker Laura Ingraham struck back at MSNBC “Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough and others who want to blame talk radio for 2012 Republican nominee Mitt Romney’s presidential election loss, suggesting that Scarborough’s anger may be linked to his radio show getting cancelled in 2010. “You got to have leaders that will turn out against the crazies in your own party,” Scarborough said Thursday morning, “and if you do — you start winning those middle, those swing voters.” Scarborough, along with others on his program Thursday, attacked certain elements in the conservative movement, including talk radio
|
Krauthammer: Expect an ´extremely aggressive and partisan´ State of the Union speech
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 2/11/2013 9:01:37 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Monday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “Special Report,” Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer predicted that tomorrow night’s State of the Union address will be the political counterpart to President Barack Obama’s fundamentally “ideological” inaugural speech. “Well, I’m not sure it will be a speech about ideas or programs,” Krauthammer said. “In fact, if the inaugural address was this sort of extraordinarily ideological address, I think the State of the Union is going to be extremely aggressive and partisan. Obama is still campaigning. He hasn’t stopped.
|
Mark Levin: ´Who the hell died and made Karl Rove queen for the day?´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 2/5/2013 1:49:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On his Monday program, syndicated conservative talker Mark Levin was irate at the news that former Bush administration deputy chief of staff Karl Rove is launching a political action committee to help electable Republicans win primaries. “I just love the way these crony capitalist Republicans — these big government Republicans, these establishment Republicans — I love the way they invoke William Buckley,” Levin said. “They invoke Ronald Reagan. Sometimes they like Obama; they invoke the Founding Fathers. And to what ends? To trash us? See, we can’t win, but the problem is we do win. Yeah, we have our losses
|
Krauthammer: We have ´a Statue of Liberty — it’s not a Statue of Equality´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 1/28/2013 2:45:25 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Over the weekend, Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer spoke at the National Review Institute Summit in Washington, D.C. During a question-and-answer session, he was asked if he thought President Barack Obama would attempt to hand-pick his successor in order to help guide the country down a path to “socialism.” Krauthammer began his response by advising against using that term. “I would just caution you about using the word, ‘socialism,’” Krauthammer said. “The reason is it is too broad a term. It encompasses all kinds of socialism, including the nasty totalitarian examples — the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic, Cuba, Korea.”
|
Levin: If Obama sidesteps Congress on debt ceiling, ´no choice´ but impeachment
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 1/15/2013 2:22:48 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On his Monday radio show, conservative talker Mark Levin said that if President Barack Obama sidesteps Congress on the debt ceiling fight and attacks the Congress’ constitutionally enumerated “core power” – that is control over spending and taxing — through executive action, Congress will have “no choice” but impeachment. Levin explained that if unilateral action by the White House — which White House spokesman Jay Carney ruled out — were to happen, it would infringe on Congress’ “core power” and should be punished with impeachment. “Now, if Obama unilaterally acts — and I think there’s a fan-dance going on here
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
We Are Living in a Dying Country
|
|
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 4:53:10 PM
Post Reply
|
|
RUSH: Folks, I don´t know how else to categorize this. We are living in a dying country. I don´t know how else to categorize what´s happening -- 88,000 new jobs. The unemployment rate, because of a terrible statistic, is down to 7.6%. The number of people in this country who are not working is shameful. Ninety million Americans are no longer in the workforce. Ninety million. People not in the labor force grew by 663,000, and now 90 million. That´s the labor force participation rate. This is 1979 levels.
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
Hillary Clinton Would Not ´Clear the Field´ for 2016
|
|
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
Hillary Clinton: The clock is turning back for women in America
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:25:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explained to the Women in the World summit in New York today that the clock is turning back for women in America. Clinton praised her own mother for helping empower her to success and marveled at the opportunities that her own daughter Chelsea has pursued. But Clinton warned that there is still so much to do to promote women´s rights in America. "As I look at all these young women that I am privileged to work with, or know through Chelsea, and its hard to imagine turning the clock on them," Clinton said.
|
White House Blames Jobs Numbers on Sequester
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
Trayvon Martin´s parents settle wrongful death claim
|
|
Orlando Sentinel, by Rene Stutzman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:15:25 PM
Post Reply
|
|
SANFORD - Trayvon Martin´s parents have settled a wrongful death claim for an amount believed to be more than $1 million against the homeowners association of the Sanford subdivision where their teenage son was killed. Their attorney, Benjamin Crump, filed that paperwork at the Seminole County Courthouse, a portion of which was made public today. In the five pages of the settlement that were available for public review, the settlement amount had been marked out. Lower in the agreement, the parties specified that they would keep that amount confidential. When asked during an earlier interview whether the amount was
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|