A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Hurricane Sandy:
Could it push back the election?

Politico, by Alex Guillen

Original Article

Posted By:BillboardBabe, 10/30/2012 1:11:40 PM

The Federal Emergency Management Agency is preparing for Hurricane Sandy to disrupt next week’s elections, agency Administrator Craig Fugate said Monday afternoon. “We are anticipating that, based on the storm, there could be impacts that would linger into next week and have impacts on the federal election,” Fugate said on a conference call with reporters. But any potential tinkering with Election Day would bring a bevy of legal issues. “Our chief counsel’s been working on making sure that we have the proper guidance,” he added. “We’re going through the regulatory policy and

Comments:
Be sure to read the last two paragraphs on the second page outlining how POTUS can issue an executive order or congress can give POTUS "authority" to postpone or delay elections indefinitely.

Prepare for war.

Please post source to site style & article to word limit as shown. LCom Staff.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: awen, 10/30/2012 1:14:21 PM     (No. 8974782)

Congress can change the date, but the President does not have the power to postpone the election - legally.

Buckle down everyone. Prepare to vote early or on Tuesday.


Reply 2 - Posted by: RosietheObserver, 10/30/2012 1:14:32 PM     (No. 8974784)

Obama would love to delay the election for about ten or twenty years.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: pigop, 10/30/2012 1:17:35 PM     (No. 8974798)

It's not a Federal election, it is 50 separate state elections and FEMA has no standing to postpone elctions whatsoever!


Reply 4 - Posted by: sardonic, 10/30/2012 1:18:02 PM     (No. 8974799)

Saw this coming a mile away


Reply 5 - Posted by: Davids918, 10/30/2012 1:20:21 PM     (No. 8974800)

Remember NJ elections and the shame they pulled with Lautenberg?

They don't care about dates, legalities, or any such thing, except winning.

Funny thing though, if they've had the ability to vote early, then there is NO reason to have delay in the actual election date.

Michelle implored people to vote early because "your sink might be backed up", remember?


Reply 6 - Posted by: lakerman1, 10/30/2012 1:21:11 PM     (No. 8974802)

my bet would be on extending voting days due to the storm. That would give missie barack kardashian plenty of time to perpetrate even more voter fraud in selected places.
Don't forget that the democrats almost proposed a re-vote in the 4 florida counties....in 2000.


Reply 7 - Posted by: cartcart, 10/30/2012 1:22:06 PM     (No. 8974805)

Hold the elections and let the chips fall.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: pgvoisin, 10/30/2012 1:27:53 PM     (No. 8974824)

Just let them try to do this. I double-dog dare you!

The Romney Campaign, the massive conservative ground game, and the Tea Party will be all over this with video and challenges. As soon as that is known, the cheaters will think twice about risking their identity just to cheat for the One!

The motivation to SAVE America is GREATER than the motivation to CHEAT America!

Romney/Ryan!


Reply 9 - Posted by: dman, 10/30/2012 1:29:13 PM     (No. 8974828)

The main damage was in NJ and NY, rock-solid blue states. Simply concede those electors or extend voting in those states only and proceed with the election in the rest of the country. While we sympathize with the Herculean clean-up task facing the impacted areas, most in the rest of the country have been through disasters of similar intensity, albeit over smaller geographic extent. We're a big country with over 300-million people and a land area over 3-million square miles. As a nation, we can walk and chew gum at the same time. The import of conducting this election in a timely manner supersedes the problems imposed by the Frankenstorm. Extend voting in NY and NJ only? Fine. It won't affect the electoral college outcome anyway. Extend voting nationwide? No way, NerØbama. Legal, Presidental end-around, whatever: no way.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Chillijilli, 10/30/2012 1:29:40 PM     (No. 8974831)

He won't DELAY the election, he'll EXTEND the election.
Just until, of course, he gets enough votes to win.


Reply 11 - Posted by: plex, 10/30/2012 1:29:50 PM     (No. 8974832)

The Federal election is Dec 17th when the Electoral college votes are taken. Congress can change this date. The electors are chosen by State elections and Congress has designated a day for all State elections. I guess that Congress can change that. The President cannot.

That is not to say he won't try. After all New York and New Jersey is where he expects a lot of votes. Upstate NY might outvote NYC and end up giving the State to Obama. Can't have that!

Not FEMA's call though US code 2 and 3 set the election dates.


Reply 12 - Posted by: redmom, 10/30/2012 1:34:50 PM     (No. 8974847)

Absolutely not. It wasn't postponed during the Civil War, are you telling me have become so incompetent, we can't manage to vote a week after a storm?

Why didn't these cities, in a hurricane prone area, use the week's worth of warning, advertise alternative polling locations and early voting?

This is just another 'wag the dog' option for a corrupt Chicago run, election.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: skillsss, 10/30/2012 1:46:50 PM     (No. 8974873)

Pushing it back till after some heavy duty Benghazi Hearings won't help much. Talk about a Catch- 22-tables-got-turned Game changing event. Have your political party deny GOD three times...Have Obama deny three times our courageous patriots on the front lines of Libya asking for aid and support...and watch and learn...Liberals will attribute the storm to "Romney's Global Warming." Lets call it "An Act of God." ROFLAO...heard the Huffington Post was taken down as well...and that crane bent over looks like somebody is flipping the bird to NY...Blue states seem to have been disproportionately given a shower from above ;-( ...seems to me when 15% already voted...the cat is already out of the bag.


Reply 14 - Posted by: FormerDem, 10/30/2012 1:48:42 PM     (No. 8974877)

That will be the end of Zippy if he tries it.


Reply 15 - Posted by: horacer, 10/30/2012 1:49:41 PM     (No. 8974880)

Stock exchange will be up and running tomorrow. Mustn't keep those hedge funds idle. I don't see how the election can be delayed. We're not yet a third world nation.


Reply 16 - Posted by: californiadude, 10/30/2012 1:50:43 PM     (No. 8974885)

#2 you could write one-liner for Letterman or Leno.
#9 I dream California goes red next Tuesday.
Keep the faith!


Reply 17 - Posted by: Hairy Eyeball, 10/30/2012 1:51:39 PM     (No. 8974889)

NJ/NY is not a Hurricane prone area, and this storm was unprecedented, a hurricane wrapped in a nor'easter. There were tropical storm force winds from The NH/Mass border to the NC/VA border at the same time, storm was that big. That said, NO vote delay! (Although two weeks may allow Benghazi facts to bubble up)


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: oh-heck, 10/30/2012 2:03:19 PM     (No. 8974903)

Our tin-ear president surely can't be stupid enough to try this. And why should he after Michelle warned the People to get out and vote because there might be a thunderstorm on election day? Keep in mind all the shoes in the air that will start to fall: Taxageddon, laid off defense workers, Medicare Advantage members who will lose their coverage, etc. It will only get worse if he waits.


Reply 19 - Posted by: biggun, 10/30/2012 2:04:54 PM     (No. 8974904)

I believe that election date is written into the Constitution: 1st Tuesday in November. Neither Congress nor Obama can change it. It would require a Constitutional amendment.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Photoonist, 10/30/2012 2:08:07 PM     (No. 8974916)

As noted this will mainly affect areas that are already assumed to be going for 0bama in a big way. So the worst that happens is that 0bama drops even more in the popular vote. Others who aren't excited about voting just needed another excuse NOT to vote and even any (illegal) extension won't get them out.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Chillijilli, 10/30/2012 2:08:43 PM     (No. 8974918)

QUOTE:
The bottom line here is that many folks who were countin on votin simply can't get to their pollin places. The subways won't be runnin and its my duty to make sure ALL folks get a chance to exercise their constitutional rights. And so, in the face of this disaster. I am therefore EXTENDING, not changing, the deadline to vote...We Americans are united in our belief that ALL Americans must be treated equally...


Reply 22 - Posted by: Chillijilli, 10/30/2012 2:11:46 PM     (No. 8974925)

Oops. I meant future quote. Sorry


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: mabelkitty, 10/30/2012 2:11:56 PM     (No. 8974927)

It is not necessary.
You've had the chance to vote absentee and early for weeks now. If you lost your window to vote, tough.

We don't need Democrats manufacturing absentee ballots with hanging chads in the basement of Precinct committeemen.


Reply 24 - Posted by: mabelkitty, 10/30/2012 2:14:28 PM     (No. 8974931)

Folks have a pencil.
Folks have a mailbox.
If folks didn't pre-plan, too bad.
Nobody, but nobody will support this power grab.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Muncsdad, 10/30/2012 2:15:07 PM     (No. 8974933)

Sadly, there will be rioting in the streets no matter what. But if Zero tries this, it won't be the usual suspects taking up arms. We will to defend this nation from tyranny.


Reply 26 - Posted by: thelmalou, 10/30/2012 2:20:17 PM     (No. 8974938)

Whatever. I'm with #20...this can only hurt him.


Reply 27 - Posted by: kennedylaw, 10/30/2012 2:51:12 PM     (No. 8974993)

Art. I, Sec. 1 of the Constitution requires that all of the electoral college electors vote on the same day, but does not require that they all be selected on the same day.

How electoral college electors are selected is expressly left up to each of the State legislatures; however, the Constitution is silent about when the electors have to be selected by the States. So federal statute spells out when the electors need to be selected.

Under 3 U.S.C. § 1, each State is required to appoint its electors (whether by direct election or otherwise) on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November.

3 U.S.C. § 1: "Time of appointing electors. The electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed, in each State, on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November, in every fourth year succeeding every election of a President and Vice President."

Under 3 U.S.C. § 2, if a State legislature decides to select the State's electors by direct election (which all 50 states have elected to do) and the State is unable to choose them on election day (which would apply if the state had to cancel elections because of weather), then it is up to the state legislature to determine how to and when to appoint the State's electors.

3 U.S.C. § 2: "Failure to make choice on prescribed day. Whenever any
State has held an election for the purpose of choosing electors, and
has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors
may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the
legislature of such State may direct."

So the simple answer is if a natural disaster hits on election day, then the affected states can cancel or postpone their elections without affecting the elections in any other states.


Reply 28 - Posted by: EQKimball, 10/30/2012 2:52:45 PM     (No. 8974998)

My guess is that he will publicly appeal to Romney to join him in going to Congress or the courts to extend the election on the east coast--ironically in the same way John McCain appealed to him to join him back at the Senate in the wake of the meltdown of the economy in October of 2008. Then, according to the press McCain was the drama queen compared to "no-Drama Obama." Now, the press will put maximum pressure on Romney to put country over politics.


Reply 29 - Posted by: bobgray2, 10/30/2012 3:04:23 PM     (No. 8975022)

There is no reason for the rest of the country to change the date of the election. So let the rest of the country vote as scheduled, and let the affected states delay their elections as needed, within reason. These particular states may not even matter in this presidential election, since I don't think anyone expects any surprises in the outcome.


Reply 30 - Posted by: ocho reales, 10/30/2012 3:31:07 PM     (No. 8975065)

I may be mistaken but I do not believe that presidential elections have ever been cancelled or postponed in the history of our nation. If they have please correct me and cite the occasion.


Reply 31 - Posted by: bighambone, 10/30/2012 10:34:47 PM     (No. 8975866)

Pushing back the election could well backfire on the Obama crew, as this was a massive storm that caused a huge amount of damage, the further out they go from the date of the storm, the more chance they have of a lot of things going wrong in the relief and reconstruction efforts and the blame being put on the federal government.

The election across the country should go forward next Tuesday, if New York and New Jersey want to wait so be it, but the voting results from all the other States would be known by the time New York and New Jersey vote, and that fact could serve to suppress the Democrat vote in those two States.



Post Reply   Close thread 709627




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "BillboardBabe"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "BillboardBabe"



Hurricane Sandy:
Could it push back the election?
Politico, by Alex Guillen    Original Article
Posted By: BillboardBabe- 10/30/2012 1:11:40 PM     Post Reply
The Federal Emergency Management Agency is preparing for Hurricane Sandy to disrupt next week’s elections, agency Administrator Craig Fugate said Monday afternoon. “We are anticipating that, based on the storm, there could be impacts that would linger into next week and have impacts on the federal election,” Fugate said on a conference call with reporters. But any potential tinkering with Election Day would bring a bevy of legal issues. “Our chief counsel’s been working on making sure that we have the proper guidance,” he added. “We’re going through the regulatory policy and



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



The most shocking news
you won´t see in the MSM today

62 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/9/2013 11:49:09 AM     Post Reply
The murder trial of abortionist Kermit Gosnell largely is being ignored by the mainstream media, even in the face of grisly testimony, such as what we heard yesterday. Life News reports: ...a former employee described how she heard a baby scream during a live-birth abortion. Abortion clinic employee Sherry West described an incident which "really freaked (her) out" and related to the jury how she heard a child who was born alive following an abortion scream.

Obama says he´s ´determined
as ever´ for gun bill

60 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Nedra Pickler    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/8/2013 10:27:49 PM     Post Reply
HARTFORD, Conn. -- With time running out on the chance to pass gun control legislation, President Barack Obama on Monday warned Congress not to use delaying tactics against tighter regulations and told families of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting victims that he´s "determined as ever" to honor their children with tougher laws. Obama´s gun control proposals have run into resistance on Capitol Hill, leaving their fate in doubt. Efforts by Senate Democrats to reach compromise with Republicans over expanding required federal background checks have yet to yield an agreement, and conservatives were promising to try

White House: Planned GOP
gun filibuster cowardly

48 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Dave Boyer    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/8/2013 11:08:31 PM     Post Reply
Beginning a week of high pressure on gun control, the White House on Monday accused some Republican senators of cowardice for planning to filibuster gun legislation without allowing the full Senate to vote on President Obama’s initiatives. “If they oppose this legislation, have the courage to say so on the floor and vote no,” said White House press secretary Jay Carney. “Don’t block it. Don’t hide behind a procedural action to prevent a vote. That’s the wrong thing to do, and that’s how the president clearly feels.”

Obama enjoys ´sequester soul concert´
at White House amid massive budget
cuts and government worker furloughs

46 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/10/2013 4:24:28 AM     Post Reply
The sequester may have many across the country singing the blues, but for President Obama, it was all about Memphis Soul. Even with the threat of furloughs and government cuts sparked by the sequester, Obama took the time to enjoy a star-studded concert at the White House tonight. The White House celebration of Memphis Soul music in the East Room--which included special guest appearances by Queen Latifah and Justin Timberlake--is likely to rile Obama´s Republican foes. Some conservatives have called on Obama to give up golf, especially since popular public tours of the White House have been canceled because of

Obamacare architect Rockefeller:
It´s ´beyond comprehension´

46 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/10/2013 7:17:19 AM     Post Reply
West Virginia Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller, one of the towering architects of Obamacare, on Tuesday openly criticized program managers for not moving quickly enough to build the system, warning that if it gets off to a bumpy start it will just get worse. Decrying the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as way too complex, he warned the acting Medicare director that Obamacare is "so complicated and if it isn´t done right the first time, it will just simply get worse."

Obama: Put Nation´s 4-Year-Olds
in ‘Public Preschool;´ Will
Save on ‘Child-Care Costs´

41 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/10/2013 1:18:38 PM     Post Reply
In the message he issued along with his budget proposal on Wednesday morning, President Barack Obama said he wants to see 4-year-old children in the United States enrolled in public schools. Obama said America needs to start enrolling 4-year-olds to make sure the children are “better prepared for the demands of the global economy” and to help parents save on "child-care costs." After saying the United States needs to “equip our citizens with the skills and training” to fill jobs in manufacturing, energy and infrastructure, Obama said, “And that has to start at the earliest possible age.”

Obama´s Army Outmaneuvered by the NRA
37 replie(s)
NationalJournal, by Beth Rinehard    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 4/10/2013 7:18:37 AM     Post Reply
Although the first votes on gun -control legislation have yet to be cast, by some measures the National Rifle Association has already won. Obama’s ambitious plans to ban assault weapons and limit magazine capacities are off the table, while the NRA suggested it could support the most likely outcome -- expanded background checks -- as recently as 1999. The NRA claims that the president’s efforts have triggered a fundraising surge and boosted its membership from 4 million to nearly 5 million.

Poll: Obama underwater on
guns, immigration, deficit

30 replie(s)
Politico, by Donovan Slack    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/8/2013 10:17:29 PM     Post Reply
A new CNN/ORC International poll found President Obama´s overall approval rating has ticked up to 51 percent but ratings have fallen on his handling of the key issues on his agenda: immigration, guns, and the deficit. On immigration, 44 percent approve of the way he is handling the issue, down from 51 percent in January. At the same time, disapproval has jumped to 50 percent, up from 43 percent in January. On guns, 45 percent approve and 52 percent disapprove, the poll found. In January, 46 percent approved and 49 percent dispproved. And on the deficit, 38 percent approve

Outraged Liberals Say Obama Is
About To Screw Over The Very
People Who Got Him Elected

30 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Grace Wyler    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/10/2013 6:35:42 AM     Post Reply
Liberals descended on Pennsylvania Avenue Tuesday to protest President Barack Obama´s decision to include entitlement cuts in his upcoming budget, delivering 2 million petitions demanding the White House back off its support for the chained CPI. As we reported this weekend, liberals have been seething over the inclusion of the chained CPI in Obama´s budget, which they see as a huge betrayal by the Democratic president. This week, progressive groups, including MoveOn, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, and Democracy for America, have mounted "emergency" online campaigns against the proposal, accusing Obama of

Sebelius: Implementing Obamacare
More ´Difficult´ Than Anticipated

30 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/10/2013 7:21:14 AM     Post Reply
Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius conceded Monday that implementing the Affordable Care Act has been more complicated and frustrating than the Obama administration expected, largely due to Republicans who have opposed the law´s state-based exchanges and Medicaid expansion. "The politics has been relentless and that continues," Sebelius said. "There was some hope that once the Supreme Court ruled in July, and then once an election occurred there would be a sense that, ´This is the law of the land, let´s get on board, let´s make this work.´"

AG sues florist who refused
flowers to gay wedding

30 replie(s)
Seattle Post-Intelligencer [WA], by Joel Connelly    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/10/2013 2:28:46 PM     Post Reply
State Attorney General Bob Ferguson on Tuesday filed a consumer protection lawsuit against Arlene’s Flowers & Gifts, a Richland florist that refused to supply flowers to the same-sex marriage of a longtime customer. Ferguson said he sent a March 28 letter to owner Barronelle Stutzman asking her to reconsider and supply flowers to customer Robert Ingersoll. Through an attorney, Stutzman declined to change her position.“As Attorney General, it is my job to enforce the laws of the state of Washington,” said Ferguson. “Under the Consumer Protection Act, it is unlawful to discriminate

Ron Johnson’s JCPenney:
Anatomy of a Retail Failure

29 replie(s)
Yahoo! Finance, by Jeff Macke    Original Article
Posted By: athina- 4/9/2013 9:45:34 AM     Post Reply
In a stunning end to one of the most aggressively unsuccessful tenures in retail history, JCPenney (JCP) last night announced that CEO Ron Johnson would be leaving effective immediately. Myron Ullman, Johnson´s predecessor at JCPenney, takes office as CEO. When Johnson was initially wooed by JCPenney, it was to serve as CEO with Ullman as Chairman. In January 2012, Ullman was unceremoniously removed from the board. Gone with Ullman was any control the Board of Directors had over Ron Johnson and his control of JCPenney resources.
Headline corrected by Staff


Post Reply   Close thread 709627





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS